The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-09-11-1000AM-RegularOG BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN. TEXAS AGENDA z FILED F02 PrLO RD DATE AT 0 c•lo~M1 rn FRtitiK GGRIc%iE R;10~ BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COURT MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1989, 10:00 A.M. 1. Invocation. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Request from Mr. Jim Mazurkewicz to address Commissioners Court. 4. Request from Mr. Jeff Haislet to address Commissioners Court in regard to 9-1-1. 5. Consider and take action on the approval of the minutes of the meeting held on August 21, 1989. 6. Consider and take action on budget amendments. 7. Consider and take action on exemption from competitive bidding requirements of local government code, Section 262.024(a)(1) in regard to low bidder no longer being in operation. 8. Consider and take action on proposal for a County Traffic/ Litter Enforcement Program. 9. Consider and take action on telephone service contract with TELINK for the Brazos County Jail. 10. Acknowledge receipt of Extension Service, County and Pre- cinct Office Reports. 11. Consider and take action on personnel change of status. 12. Consider and take action on payment of claims. 13. Adjourn. • VOL PAGE ~.3 COMMISSIONERS' COURT REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1989 A regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court of Brazos County, Texas was held in the Commissioners' Courtroom in the ~jCourthouse in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas, beginning at 10.00 I'a.m. on Monday, September 11, 1989, with the following members of ~I ,the Court present: R. J. Holmgreen, County Judge, Presiding; Gary Norton, Commissioner of Precinct 1; Walter Wilcox, Commissioner of Precinct 2; ~I Randy Sims, Commissioner of Precinct 3; Milton Turner, Commissioner of Precinct 4; Frank Boriskie, County Clerk. li The following citizens and officials were in attendance: Ruth McLeod it Carol Palmer Bea Green Rosalie Todaro A. H. Winder Travis Nelson Sandie Walker I; Jim Mazurkiewicz Rick Jahn Bill Thornal W. E. Pittman { Ron Miller Elizabeth Sharp Alice Brown Kathy Young 1+ Ramiro Quintero ii Jeff Haislet Executive Assistant Admin. Asst. to County Judge Secretary to Commissioners Auditor's Office County Engineer District Clerk Treasurer County Extension Agent County Extension Agent Pct. 7 Constable Office Constable Pct. 7 Sheriff Bryan/College Station Eagle KBTX-TV KBTX-TV Brazos County Resident 9-1-1 League of Women Voters Texas Ag. Extension Service TELINK Communications 'I Commissioner Sims gave the invocation and led the pledge of ,allegiance. ;I The County Judge recognized Jim Mazurkiewicz, County li Judy Greer Kyle Smith Maurice Mascorro iExtension Agent, who introduced the newest Brazos County Extension Agent, Rick Jahn who replaces Monty Dozier. Kyle !Smith, Texas Agricultural Extension Service District Supervisor, ; 11 1 (,informed the Court that Mr. Jahn's effective date of employment 11will be October 1, 1989. The County Judge welcomed Mr. Jahn to Ilthe community, then on motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by IiCommissioner Norton, the Court voted unanimously to authorize his I 1!appointment to the position. • ~icommissioners' Court meeting September 11, 1989 1 ~i The Court next considered approval of the minutes of the ,Commissioners' Court meeting held August 21, 1989. On motion by ff;iCommissioner Sims, seconded by Commissioner Norton, the Court 1! ;voted unanimously to approve the minutes as submitted. ~I The Court next considered Budget Amendment #10, which would reallocate funds budgeted for the Sheriff's Department and Tax Office. It will also increase the budget for fire protection and ' ~ i ;increase the General Fund budget by $31,124.00. On motion by I ' Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Sims, the Court voted unanimously to approve the budget amendment as submitted, a .copy of which is attached hereto. The Court next considered a Wavier of Competitive Bidding Requirements as provided in Section 262.024(a)(1) of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes for the purchase of hauling services from SST Transport, Inc. for the Road and Bridge Department. This was necessitated due to the notification that J&H Truck Service who was awarded bidder of the County's annual hauling !contract #89-494 is no longer in operation. On motion by • ';Commissioner Wilcox, seconded by Commissioner Sims, the Court !'voted unanimously to approve the Waiver of Competitive Bidding -Requirements and authorized the payment of $26,755.94 to SST Transport, Inc. for the necessary haulinq services. Commissioner Norton read a proposal for a County I ' .Traffic/Litter Enforcement Program. He stated the purpose of the j'pilot program was the enforcement of Vernon's Civil statutes I ;article 4477-9a Litter Abatement Act and aggressive enforcement of county traffic laws throughout Brazos County. In the Proposal I'Constable Winfred Pittman and two of his full time staff will be ;appointed Traffic/Litter Enforcement Officers. Implementation of ,the "Pilot Program' will be September 15, 1989 with the ;;understanding that it is to be monitored for a one year period. ;I JRamiro Quintero, Brazos County resident, stated there was too • !much bad in this proposal because of selective law enforcement and that it would only benefit Precinct 1. He asked that the citizens be given the opportunity to speak out on the issue. Mr. VO PAG 1jCommissioners' Court meeting September 11, 1989 IlQuintero was advised that the laws would be enforced through out i Ithe County with no one precinct benefiting more than any other. (Richard Rosas, owner of Rosas Trucking objected to the proposal on the grounds that this action would affect his trucking !:business on Rock Prairie Road. He informed the Court that he had Ito comply with the State Railroad Commission, effective October ~1, 1989 he would have to comply with the Federal ICC and that (,this was one more organization with a set of rules with which to comply. He stated that in the past he has helped the County 'repair damage done to Rock Prairie Road and that the Sheriff was doing a good job. The Sheriff asked if his department will ;retain responsibility for the license and weight officer. Commissioner Wilcox stated it will not affect whatever he does at the present time. Commissioner Wilcox responded to Mr. Rosas by saying that no more laws will be enforced than are currently on the books. Commissioner Norton stated that the Sheriff does have one deputy that performs the license and weights duties. The Sheriff often works short handed in criminal investigation and has to pull the license and weights deputy off at times, thus keeping him from functioning fully in this area. On motion by Commissioner Wilcox, seconded by Commissioner Sims, the Court voted unanimously to implement the program and appoint Winfred i Pittman and two of his deputies as Traffic/Litter Enforcement i Officers. A full copy of the County Traffice/Litter Engorcement Program is attached hereto. On motion by Commissioner Sims, seconded by Commissioner I ',Wilcox, the Court voted unanimously to enter into contract with IiTELINK for the installation of a new telephone system in the :,jail. TELINK will install at its own expense whatever equipment !As necessary to complete the inmate calls, arrange for the it ►necessary billing of the completed calls and distribute the ;I Jproceeds according to paragraph 4 of the contract. A copy of ithe contract is attached hereto. 1j The Court acknowledged receipt of the Extension Service Ilreports for August 1989 and receipt of reports from County and VOL I V PAG i •~1 Commissioners' Court meeting September 11, 1989 !Precinct Offices showing revenues collected and remitted to the !County Treasurer. An excerpt from those reports is attached (hereto. { The Court proceeded to consider'the change of status of the • (following employees. NAME ,I Yeager, Megan I Hunter, Freddie Jackson, Lance Brown, Ken I Alonzo, Lorenzo Martin, Patricia Anderson, Rodney Rockett, Tedi Parker, Margaret Mobley, Holly f Montemayor, Sonia I~ Lozano, Deborah ' Boyles, Wanda Scofield, Stacy Wentrcek, E. Jr. Jackson, Tamara Holzfaster, Bessie Jackson, Lance DEPARTMENT Tax Office Juvenile Serv. Juvenile Serv. Juvenile Serv. Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Anti DWI Grant Juvenile Serv. Juvenile Serv. Juvenile Serv. Juvenile Serv. REASON Resignation Resignation Resignation Lateral Tran. To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept To Reg. Dept Chg. Dept. # Chg. Dept. # Chg. Dept. # Chg. Dept. # On motion by Commissioner Sims, seconded by Commissioner Norton, • ;!the Court voted unanimously to approve the changes as submitted. ' The Court next considered the following Claims as submitted l'by the County Treasurer for payment: ~i 10 General Fund----------------Claims 141527 thru 141741 20 Road & Bridge---------------Claims 141814 thru 141921 21 Boonville Cemetery----------Claims 141742 thru I~ 22 Road & Bridge II------------Claims 141743 thru 141759 I~ 40 Law Library-----------------Claims 141760 thru 171761 43 Oil & Gas Fund--------------Claims 141762 thru 171765 53 Voter Registration----------Claims 141780 thru 141781 54 Health Department-----------Claims 141782 thru 141790 60 Payroll---------------------Claims 141791 thru 141803 61 Health & Life Ins-----------Claims 141804 thru 141805 i~ 90 Community Services Off------Claims 141806 thru 141807 91 Juvenile Comm. Grant--------Claims 141808 thru 97 Narc. Traf. Task Force------Claims 141809 thru 141813 On motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner -:Norton, the Court voted unanimously to approve the Claims as ;submitted. it The County Judge recognized Jeff Haislett, Executive I . 'Director of the 9-1-1 Brazos County Emergency Communications ,i !:District. Mr. Haislet gave a lengthy history of the 9-1-1 ~1District and brought the Court up to the current events. The 1 County Judge explained that since the City of College Station had V Q'~ PAG Y ~ V ommissioners' Court meeting September 11, 1989 11 decided it wanted its own Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP), Brazos County proposed to join with the City of Bryan for one centralized PSAP for the two entities. The Sheriff voiced his ,approval of the proposal. Mr. Haislet indicated the proposal would be considered at the next 9-1-1 meeting. The County Judge !thanked Mr. Haislet for the presentation. There being no further business to come before the Court, the meeting was adjourned. I . I I~ i I i ~I ~I I~ I((II II II it I 2 y I PAG 4 -?R I The foregoing minutts have been ,,examined and approved in open Court this the day of 19, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas. R. J 11o1mgreen County Judge I Walter Wilcox Commissioner, Precinct 2 Milton Turner Commissioner, Precinct 4 • 0 ~ N Commis er, Precinct 3 ran Bor s County Clerk V%'.n.oL PAG ,9Gary twttah ~e4-" D Comm Vioner, Precinct 1 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENT(S) FOR THE 1989 BUDGET YEAR NO. 10 On this the 11th day of September 1989 at a special meetings of the Commissioners' Court, the following members were present: R. J. Holmgreen, County Judge, Presiding Gary Norton, Commissioner, Precinct 1; Walter Wilcox, Commissioner, Precinct 2; Randy Sims, Commissioner, Precinct 3; Milton Turner, Commissioner, Precinct 4; Frank Boriskie, County Clerk. The following proceedings were held: THAT WHEREAS, on September 11, 1989, the Court heard and approved a budget amendment for the 1989 budget year for Brazos County, Texas. WHEREAS, an emergency expenditure is necessary due to grave public necessity to meet unusual and unforeseen conditions which could not be reasonably included in the original budget adopted September 29, 1988, the following amendment(s) to the original are hereby authorized, as described on the attached 1 page(s). ADOPTED AND APPROVED this the llth day of September 1989 THE COMMISSIONERS' COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. By: Z:A: r^ f R. J. Holmgreen, County Judge Original: County Clerk's Office and attached to the original budget Copies: County Auditor County Treasurer Commissioners' Court Minutes Budget Amendment File A ` 0 V-P O f t 1-~ \ ' _ } .may Budget Amendment # 10 9-11-89 • 0 Account No Department Reason Increase (Decrease) 10-29-5421 Fire Prot. Increase to Millican VFD Budget 3,890.50 10-29-5422 Increase to Precinct 1 Budget 3,890.50 10-29-5423 Increase to Precinct 2 Budget 7,781.00 10-29-5424 Increase to Precinct 3 Budget 7,781.00 '10-29-5425 Increase to Precinct 4 Budget 7,781.00 INCREASE TO DEPARTMENT BUDGET $31,124 10-31-6210 Sheriff Reallocation Off Furn/Equip of funds 4,500 10-31-5511 Reallocation Print/Film of funds (4,500) NO INCREASE TO DEPARTMENT BUDGET 10-26-6210 Tax Reallocation Off Furn/Equip Office of funds 800 10-26-5210 Reallocation Off Supplies of funds (800) NO INCREASE TO DEPARTMENT BUDGET INCREASE TO GENERAL FUND BUDG ET $31,124 Y I t 1 MEMO To: Sharon Fairchild, County Auditor From: R. J. Holmgreen, County Judge RE: KIDIPTTON FROM COMPETITIVE BIDDING T WIREM TPS OF YDCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, SECTION 262.024(a)(1) Please be advised that on this 11th day of September, 1989, at a Regular Session of Commissioners' Court on which the following members were present: R. J. Holm reen P- ounty Judge A/12--~ Gar Norton 'tr A' Commissioner, Pct. 1 Walter Wilcox Commissioner, Pct. 2 Rand Sims d Commissioner, Pct. 3 Milton Turner Commissioner, Pct. 4 Due to notification that J & H Truck Service, Inc. who was the awarded bidder of the County's Annual Hauling Contract #89-494 is no longer in operation, the Commissioners' Court has determined that there is a need to purchase hauling services from SST Transport, Inc., and hereby approves payment and grants an exemption from the competitive bidding requirement as an item that must be purchased promptly to preserve the property of the County, as provided in the Local Government Code, Section 262.024(a)(1). 1 1 PROPOSAL COUNTY TRAFFIC/LITTER ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM • • PROPOSAL: I propose the Brazos County Commissioners Court adopt a resolution appointing Constable Winfred Pittman and two of his full time staff (all state certified peace officers) as County Traffic/Litter Enforcement Officers. PURPOSE: To address the problems previously stated by aggressive enforcement of county traffic laws as prescribed by Court approved regulatory signs and state laws where applicable on county roads and to enforce Vernon's Civil Statutes Article 4477- 9a LITTER ABATEMENT ACT in the rural portion of Brazos County. SCOPE: It will be the intent of the Court that only Constable Pittman and two of his full time deputies be named the County's Traffic/Litter Enforcement Officers. This program is to be implemented September 15, 1989 with the understanding that it is a "pilot" project and is to be monitored for a one year period. The duties of the Traffic & Litter Enforcement Officer are to function in conjunction with the Constable's current duties. Any servies or current duties are not to be compromised for any reason. k111101 L- V P At G rg -Z 0 ~ P 7 A need for litter and traffic enforcement in the county proper has been identified. There is virtually no traffic or litter enforcement on our county roads and aS a result blatant violations are occurring that are adversely affecting all taxpayers. By this I mean that speed limits, weight limits and other traffic regulatory signs and devices are ignored by motorists on our county roads. This results in the ultimate i premature destruction of our rural roads and costs us all in precious tax dollars to repair them. Because of the limited tax dollars budgeted to our road and bridge department, many of these prematurely damaged roads cannot be repaired in a timely manner. This results in costly auto repairs and creates i dangerous situations for users of these roads. Litter is yet another area that not only costs tax dollars to ' deal with but also hurts our ecology. It reflects poorly on Brazos County. Nothing is more distracting to a resident of ' Brazos County or a potential resident than the unsightly appearance of trash and garbage littering our right of way. It is because of theses previously stated reasons that I make the following proposal. T _ Y All traffic and litter enforcement will be performed by any one or all three of said persons only while operating a fully marked and equipped police vehicle. TFie vehicle must clearly indicate by an insignia on the doors and other markings as deemed necessary, that it is a Brazos County CONSTABLE'S emergency vehicle. This includes overhead emergency lighting equipment and siren. These officers must be wearing proper uniforms that clearly indicate that they are a Constable or Constable Deputy at the time contact with the violator is made. To eliminate confusion, citations issued to offenders shall indicate which enforcement agency is responsible for the issuance of said citation, the name and office of the Constable and phone number to call for further information. By order of the Court, Precinct 7 Constable Pittman and two of his full time deputies only, will be designated as County Traffic/Litter Enforcement officers and will have county wide responsibility. The express purpose being to reduce confusion by the general public by having only one contact office to contend with should there be any questions. This is in no way intended to interfere with the Sheriff's Department's authority tG enforce said laws or impede the desires of any Sheriff's Deputy to do so. It is however, an attempt by the Commissioner's Court to utilize already existing resources to help in the area of Traffic/Litter Enforcement for the rural portion of the County. Job descriptions and work schedules for this program will be the responsibility of Constable Pittman. Express authority for the enforcement of these laws by the Constable's office is derived from Article 6701d, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6702-1 Sec. 2.301 and Article 4477-9a. {i V°`1 E TELIK THE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE SPECIALISTS TELINK INMATE TELEPHONE SERVICE AGREEMENT • This Agreement is made and erikered into this 11th day of September _ 1989 by and between TELINK, a Texas Corporation, with its principal office at 3000 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 555, Bryan, Brazos County, Texas 77802 and Brazos County Jail with its principal office at 300 East 26th Street Bryan, Texas 77803 (hereinafter referred to as "Customer°). BACKGROUND • TELINK is in the business of providing telephone services for inmate calls for the Customer ana desires to act as the Company for complation a<<d hill iug of such calls from the Customer's location set forth in this Agreement at no cost to the Customer and Customer desires to obtain TELINK to perform said services. THEREFORE, the parties agree to be legally bound as follows: 1. Representations of Customer. Customer hereby represents to TEL-INK that it owns o; ccntrols the facilities referred to in thia Agreement and ha the unrestrictcd right, power, and aut4ority to enter int this Agreement with TELINK. a4. 3000 BRIARCREST DRIVE, SUITE 555 • BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 • (409) 776.0270 I V ' 2. Services of TELINK. TELINK will arrange for the necessary facilities from the local exchange company and inter-exchange carrier to terminate the inmate calls. TELINK, at its expense, will install whatever equipment is necessary to screen and complete the inmate calls. TELINK will arrange for the necessary billing of the completed calls and distribute the proceeds in accordance with Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. 3. Service Agreement. (a) Installation. All work will be done in a profes- sional, workman-like manner by fully qualified and trained personnel. The number of telephones installed will be determined by mutual consent and agreement between TELINK and the Customer. All equipment provided by TELINK shall remain the property of TELINK and will be installed at no cost to the Customer. (b) Maintenance. TELINK will respond to a maintenance or repair request from the Customer within 24 hours for minor outages and within 6 hours for major outages. A minor outage is defined as the inability to originate calls from less than 258 of the stations served by TELINK. A major outage is defined as the inability to originate calls from more than 258 of the stations served by TELINK. 1 4. Distribution of Collected Proceeds by TELINK. TELINK agrees to provide for the Customer distribution of revenues actually billed and collected as follows: a. 15% of flat rate billed collect calls gross • revenue. b. 0% of flat rate revenue for calls billed to an inmate's account. C. 30% of surcharge revenue added to long dist- ance collect calls. d. 15% of gross revenue on long distance collect calls. Distribution will be made sixty (60) days following the end of the month in which the call giving rise to the revenue f is generated. All distribution of revenue will be final and binding on the Customer unless written objection thereto is provided to TELINK within sixty (60) days of Customer's l receipt of distribution. 5. Term. I (a) Subject to the provisions of (b) and (c) below, the term of this Agreement shall be for a period of 5 Years commencing on the date of this Agreement, and shall renew . automatically for like successive renewal periods, unless either party terminates this Agreement by giving written notice of termination to the other party at least sixty (60) days prior to the effective date of any such renewal period. i V r f t ,f (b) During the period beginning with the 31st month after the commencement of service under this Agreement, the Customer has the right to cancel this Agreement by giving a sixty (60) day written notice of cancellation to TELINK. (c) TELINK shall be entitled to cancel this Agreement on a sixty (60) day written notice to the Customer in the event that a significant number of calls prove to be unbillable or if the Customer manages the facility such that the inmates are not allowed reasonable access to the telephones. 6. Indemnification. TELINK hereby indemnifies and holds Customer harmless from and against all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, and expenses suffered or incurred by Customer arising out of any gross negligence of TELINK in performing its services under this Agreement. Customer hereby indemnifies and holds TELINK harmless from and against all claims, liabilities, losses, damages, and expenses suffered or incurred by TELINK arising from the use of the service that results in a jail break and/or injuries, or the use of installed TELINK equipment by one inmate to injure another, unless installation was faulty. T ,~1 7. Access. The Customer agrees to provide TELINK reasonable access to the premises and the telephone facilities as required by TELINK to perform the services outlined in this Agreement. In the event TELINK installs any equipment on the Customer's premise as part of this Agreement, such equipment will remain the property of TELINK. 8. Notices. Any and all notices given hereunder shall be deemed properly given if in writing and either hand delivered or sent by registered or certified United States mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to a party at its address set forth above or at such other address as a party may hereafter specify by written notice to the other. v• 9. Assignment. This Agreement may be assigned by TELINK to any Parent or Affiliate of TELINK upon written notice to Customer. 10. Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their permitted successors and assigns. %.0 -V PAGE 63 0I T i 11. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. 12. Entire Agreement. This represents the entire agreement between the parties and no representations have been made or relied upon by either party except as contained herein. 13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counter- parts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement on the date first above written. "CUSTOMER" TELINK GL~O~j By: By: (,V\ Maurice Mascorro Title: County Judge Title: Director of Sales I BRAZOS COUNTY I Rev. 5/89 VOA PO E 10 T THE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE SPECIALISTS LETTER OF AGENCY To Whom It May Concern: • On this 11th day of September , 19 89 , we have entered into a contractual Agreement with TELINK for them to act as our agent for the installation of a new telephone system, including the installation, rearrangement, and/or the subscription of existinU or additional central office lines. Under the terms of this Agreement and by this letter, we do hereby authorize TELINK to handle all nagctiations for this alteration or addition on our behalf. We further agree that the telephone company shall be relieved of any liability for following TELINK's instructions with respect to this order from your company. This authorization does not preclude our ability to act on our behalf when we deem it necessary. CUSTOMER INFORMATION: Name: Brazos County Jail Address: 300 East 26th Street Bryan Texas 77803 City State Zip Code Phone-Main: (4091 361-4100 Coulity: Brazos Contact: John Godfrey Phone: 361-4100 % • Title: Location (if different): Aut orize- Sig a ate THANK YOU ('\ICl.,. _%.j A (`-\4__aZ.S.,_ TELINK Representative -pn 3000 BRIARCREST DRIVE, SUITE 555 - BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 - (409) 776.0270 • T i OFFICERS REPORTS AUGUST 1989 FRANK BORISKIE, COUNTY CLERK Fees Trial Fee County Judge Fees County Attorney Fees Sheriff's Fees Arrest Fees Bond Service Fees Judge's Education Fees Committment Fees Fees-Bryan/College Station Criminal Justice Planning Law Enforcement Fees Victims of Crime Judicial Court Training Operators Chauf. License Law Library Fees Road and Bridge Fines Appellate Court Fees Other/Jury Fee Probate Interest/Bail Bond Account TOTAL TRAVIS NELSON, DISTRICT CLERK Fees Trial & Jury Fee Sheriff's Fees Sheriff's Jury Fees District Attorney Fees DPS Arrest Fees Criminal Justice Planning Law Enforcement Fund Victims of Crime Fund Judicial Court Training Road and Bridge Fines Law Library Fees Appellate Court Fees Interest/Bail Bond Account TOTAL B.H. DEWEY, JR., JUSTICE OF PEACE PRECINCT 4, PLACE 1 Fines Small Claims Civil Claims Sheriff's Fees Constable Fees-Pct. 4 ,Copies/Abstracts of Judgement Jury. Fee Transcript Fees Vii,t -Fees -Execution Fees Citation Fees Other TOTAL $34,835.10 545.00 181.50 4,404.70 1,473.35 1,299.00 654.00 81.00 140.00 0.00 1,085.00 109.00 1,623.00 109.00 225.00 225.00 22,149.60 15.00 0.00 1,128.31 $70,282.56 $13,198.00 150.00 2,163.00 560.00 242.00 0.00 250.00 13.00 245.00 10.00 1,520.00 840.00 560.00 0.00 $19,751.00 $0.00 70.00 180.00 0.00 810.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 2.00 7.42 $1,119.42 vo~~L-PAG ya- • • OFFICERS REPORTS AUGUST 1989 CAROLYN M. HENSARLING, JUSTICE OF PEACE, PRECINCT 4, PLACE 2 Fines (County Share) $9,578.85 Sheriff Fees 48.00 Constable Fees Pct. 4 0.00 Constable Fees Pct. 7 0.00 Brazos County - Arrest Fee 0.00 TABC - Arrest Fee 84.00 DPS-Arrest Fee '417.00 i Parks & Wildlife-Arrest Fee 3.00 Sp. Exp. Deferred Adjudication 111.50 Bail Bond Interest 0.00 Driving Safety/Insurance Fees 180.00 Certified Copies/Abstracts 37.00 Checking Account Interest 78.28 Criminal Justice Planning 870.00 Law Enforcement Fees 259.00 Crime Victims Compensation 531.00 Judicial Court Training 173.00 Operators/Chauf. License Fund 450.00 TOTAL $12,820.63 GEORGE BOYETT,. JUSTICE OF PEACE PRECINCT 7, PLACE 1 Fines (County Share) $3,523.50 Constable Fees - Pct. 7 70.00 TABC-Arrest Fee 123.00 College Station PD Arrest Fee 0.00 TAMU Arrest Fee 102.00 DPS Arrest Fee 42.00 Small Claims/Civil Fees 36.00 Certified Copies/Abstracts 0.00 Jury/Citation Fees 5.00 Driving Safety/Insurance Fees 80.00 Checking Account Interest 34.37 Criminal Justice Planning 450.00 Law Enforcement Fees 133.50 Crime Victims Compensation 279.00 Judicial Court Training 89.00 Operators/Chauf. License Fund 150.00 Deferred Fees 36.50 TOTAL $5,153.87 WES HALL, JUSTICE OF PEACE, PRECINCT 7, PLACE 2 Fines (County Share) $1,555.50 Constable Fees - Pct. 7 285.00 TABC Arrest Fee 9.00 Parks & Wildlife-Arrest Fee 0.00 TAMU-Arrest Fee 84.00 DPS-Arrest Fee 3.00 Small Claims/Civil Fees 118.00 Certified Copies/Abstracts 15.00 Jury/Citation Fees 0.00 Driving Safety/Insurance Fees 60.00 Deferred Adjudication Admin. Fee 10.00 Checking Account Interest 25.45 Criminal Justice Planning 160.00 Law Enforcement Fees 46.00 Crime Victims Compensation 96.00 Judicial Court Training 32.00 Operators/Chauf. License Fund 150.00 TOTAL $2,648.95 F'i VOL OFFICERS REPORTS AUGUST 1989 MARY HORN, JUSTICE OF PEACE, PRECINCT 2 V Fines (County Share) $5,075.00 Sheriff Fees 0.00 Constable Fees 35.00 DPS-Arrest Fee 288.00 Parks & Wildlife-Arrest Fee 0.00 TABC-Arrest Fee 0.00 Civil Fees/Small Claims 15.00 Certified Copies/Abstracts 9.50 Jury/Citation Fees 5.00 Driving Safety/Insurance Fees 390.00 Checking Account Interest 32.48 Court Fee 0.00 Criminal Justice Planning 480.00 Law Enforcement Fees 141.50 Crime Victims Compensation 288.00 Judicial Court Training 96.00 Operators/Chauf. License Fund 225.00 TOTAL $7,080.48 TOMMY LYONS, JUSTICE OF PEACE, PRECINCT 1 Fines (County Share) $2,776.00 Sheriff Fees 0.00 Constable Fees 0.00 DPS-Arrest Fee 165.00 Parks & Wildlife-Arrest Fee 3.00 Civil Fees/Small Claims 0.00 Certified Copies/Abstracts 0.00 Jury/Citation Fees 0.00 Driving Safety/Insurance Fees 160.00 Checking Account Interest 16.24 Criminal Justice Planning 285.00 Law Enforcement Fees 83.50 Crime Victims Compensation 180.00 Judicial Court Training 56.00 Operators/Chauf. License Fund 225.00 TOTAL $3,949.74 RAY TRUELOVE, JUSTICE OF PEACE, PRECINCT 3 Fines (County Share) $2,732.50 Sheriff Fees 0.00 Constable Fees Pct. 3 0.00 DPS-Arrest Fee 150.00 Parks & Wildlife-Arrest Fee 0.00 TABC Arrest Fees 0.00 Civil Fees/Small Claims 0.00 Certified Copies/Abstracts 0.00 Jury/Citation Fees/TABC 0.00 Driving Safety/Insurance Fees 100.00 Checking Account Interest 15.72 Criminal Justice Planning 250.00 Law Enforcement Fees 73.00 Crime Victims Compensation 150.00 Judicial Court Training 50.00 Operators/Chauf. License Fund 300.00 TOTAL $3,821.22 va1._-PAGE / Y r - i OFFICERS REPORTS AUGUST 1989 r ANTONE DOBROVOLNY, JUSTICE OF PEACE, PRECINCT 5 Fines (County Share) Sheriff Fees Constable Fees-Pct. 5 DPS-Arrest Fee Parks & Wildlife-Arrest Fee TABC Arrest Fees Civil Fees/Small Claims Certified Copies/Abstracts Jury/Citation Fees Driving Safety/Insurance Fees Deferred Adjudication Admin. Fees Checking Account Interest Criminal Justice Planning Law Enforcement Fees Crime Victims Compensation Judicial Court Training Operators/Chauf. License Fund TOTAL RAYMOND DAY, CONSTABLE, PRECINCT 1 Fees JOHNNY BURKHALTER, CONSTABLE, PRECINCT 2 Fees D£RIK MATEJKA, CONSTABLE, PRECINC Fees LOUIS GARCIA, CONSTABLE, PRECINCT 4 Fees FRANKIE NEMEC, JR., CONSTABLE PRECINCT 5 Fees 4 WINFRED PITTMAN, CONSTABLE, PRECINCT 7 Fees BRAZOS CENTER Fees Interest Deposits Retained ! TOTAL RONNIE MILLER, SHERIFF Work Release Fees Bail Bond Fees Civil Fees Meal Reimbursement Bail Bond Board Interest TOTAL ■ $11,120.16 3.00 35,00 633.00 21,00 15.00 22.00 0.00 5.00 400.00 0.00 77.73 1,155.00 333.00 756.00 224.00 600.00 $15,399.89 NO REPORT NO REPORT NO REPORT NO REPORT $35.00 NO REPORT $5,295.50 117.84 75.00 $5,488.34 $388.00 260.00 680.00 120.00 171.35 $1,619.35 OFFICERS REPORTS AUGUST 1989 E. A. WENTRCEK, JUVENILE PROBATION Fees DAN BETO, ADULT PROBATION Fines Restitution Court Costs TOTAL JIM KUBOVIAK, COUNTY ATTORNEY Check Collection Fees Check Subcription Fees Investigator Fees TOTAL GERALD L. WINN, TAX ASSESSOR/ COLLECTOR Ad Valorem Fees TOTAL OVERSIZE/OVERWEIGHT PERMITS ESTRAY FEES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT $520.08 $24,158.70 $17,808.98 $7,500.83 $49,468.51 NO REPORT $0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $56,230.95 16,281.63 $72,512.58 $0.00 $0.00 VO V PACE- tp-V6-