HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-02-10-1000AM-Regular' ~ ~ A . •w'..""+.~3K. Wks-J.lTl 'rr'..:.:.~._.." ...~.1:~-: ~.c:ai.~.Y.i..r
d t 1
COMMISSIONERS' COURT
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 10, 1975
A regular meeting of•the Commissioners' Court of Brazos
County, Texas, was held in the Commissioner's' Courtroom in the
Courthouse in Bryan,'•Brazos County, Texas, beginning at 10:00
A. M. on Monday, February 10, 1975, with the following present:
William R. Vance,,County Judge, presiding;
Bill J. Cooley, Commissioner of Precinct 1;
Walter Wilcox, Commissioner of Precinct 2;
Randy Sims, Commissioner of Precinct 3;
W. A. Stasny, Commissioner of Precinct 4;
Frank Boriskie, County Clerk.
The minutes of the previously 'held meetings were examined
and approved without change.-
The Court received, approved and orderd filed as submitted
the folowing reports for January, 1975:,
B. V. Elkins, County Welfare Officer;
W. T. Sistrunk, County Extension Agent;
Curtis Taylor, Jr., County Extension Agent;
Douglas Presley, County Extension Agent;
Mable Walker, County Extension ',gent;
Linda McCormack, County'Extension'Agent,
The Court received, considered and approved the following
reports from County and Precinct Officers showing official fees
of office collected and remitted to the County Treasurer according
to duplicate copies of the Treasurer's official receipts attached
thereto:
J
_V _ -
v "
1
I •
a aiLp BBL Ibk1c, CUUL«y Clerk:
Fees
County Judge's Fees
.$.4,,.8.88.80
Sheriff's Fees
363.00
547
10
Coun-ty Attorney's Fees
.
1,162.40
Law Library
69.00
Fines. . . . . .
Criminial Justice Fees ( 50
3,759.20
250.00
Total.
'
039
50
$11
.
J. W. Hamilton, Sheriff
.
,
2
494.60
Raymond B. Buchanan,,Tax Assessor-Collector.........
,
W. D. Burley, District Clerk:
Fees.
1,753.75
Sheriff's Fees..,
258.50
District Attorney's Fees...
209.00
Constable, Precinct 4
4.00
Constable, Precinct 7
12.00
Fines
520.00
Trial & Jury Fee's
40.00
Law Library.....
~
198.00
Criminal Justice
Fees
60.00
Total.
3,055.25
John Godfrey, Probation Officer.
2,337.00
B'. H. Dewey, Jr., Justice of Peace,
Precinct,4, Place 1:
.Fines.
7,286.20
Sheriff's Fees.......
75.00
Constable, Precinct 4......
58.00
Small Claims
"
.
37.75
( Cher)
Civil Fees...
Criminal Justice Fees 0395)........
987.50
Total... .
~
8,447.95
Jess B. McGee, Justiceof
Peace,
• Precinct 4, Place 2:
Fines.
~
1,777.00
Sheriff's
Fees...............
Constable, Precinct 4 .
Criminal Justice Fees (42)........
105.00
Total.. .
1,882.00
Joe Daniel Novosad, Justice of
Peace,
Precinct 5:...
Fines.............
Criminal
Total. . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Michael B. Calliham, Justice of Peace,
Precinct;7, Place 1:
Fines.
~
3,087.50
Sheriff's
Fees.
Constable, Precinct 7
136.00
Small Claims Fees
12.00
Civil Fees...... .
.
Criminal Justice Fees (
238)••••••••
405.00
Total. .
~
3
640
50
A. P. Boyett,Jr., Justice of
Peace,
,
.
Precinct 7, Place 2:
Fines...........................
~
45.00
Sheriff's
Fees.
~
Constable, Precinct
7.
~
~
Criminal Justice Fees (
3
7.50
Total
52.50
The Court received bids from the City National Bank of Bryan,,
First Bank And Trust of Bryan,-First National Bank of Bryan and the
University National Bank of College Station, to act as Depository
for Brazos County for the 1975-76 Biennium. After opening all bids
the Court unanimously agreed to defer further consideration of such
bids until Monday, February 24, 1975, at 10:00 A. M.
The Court next considered the adoption of a Resolution opposing
'.the proposed County Court At Law for Brazos County. Commissioner
Sims moved that such Resolution be adopted by the Court, with Comm-
issioner Wilcox seconding the motion. After a discussion, Commissioner
Sims withdrew the motion to adopt the Resolution, pending the results
of the questionaire distributed to members of the Bar Association
for their feelings on additonal Courts in Brazos County. Commissioner
Wilcox withdrew his second to the motion.
B. V. Elkins, County Treasurer appeared before the Court
-requesting.a clerk for his office on a half time basis. After some
discussion, Commissioner Cooley moved that the Treasurer be allowed
to hire such employee at a salary of $2.00 per hour. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Sims and carried unanimously.
The nekt item for consideration was the second year application
of the Troubled Youth Program. After considerable discussion Comm-
issioner,Sims moved that such application be approved at a cost to
Brazos County not to exceed $4,268.00. Motion was seconded by Comm-
issioner Cooley and carried unanimously.
The Troubled Youth Program had a second request, that Brazos
County advance their share of the funding for operating expense for
the program until the final approval of the application by the
Criminal Justice Council. Commissioner Sims moved that such advance
be made. Commissioner Cooley seconded the motion which carried un-
animously.
G
I
S I
_
The Court next considered the appointment of four (4) additional
members to the Brazos-County Bicentennial Committee. On motion by
Commissioner Stasny, seconded by Commissioner Cooley, the Court
voted unanimously to appoint the following four people:
Mr. Donald Borgeson Mrs. Sherry Bradshaw
405 Olive, Bryan 1601 Holleman, Apt. R-1, Col. Sta.
Mrs. Doris Watson Ms..Emily Pickett
1307 Angelina Court, Col. Sta. 1314-A Barak Lane, Bryan
The Court next considered bids for three (3) five drawer legal
file cabinets for the District Clerk's Office. On motion by Commiss-
ioner Cooley, seconded by Commissioner Stasny, the Court voted unan-
imously to accept the low bid of Hart Office Centers in the amount of
$792.00. The other bid being from Hill Printing And Stationery Co.
in the amount of $948.00.
Consideration was next given to bids for office furniture and
a file cabinet for various offices in the Courthouse. On motion by
Commissioner Stasny, seconded by Commissioner Cooley, the Court voted
unanimously to accept the low bid of News Office Supply in the amount
of $460.00 for two (2) metal secretarial desks (one for the District
Clerk's Office and one for the Office of the Justice of the Peace,
Precinct 4, place 2) and $110.00 fora four drawer file cabinet for
the Office of Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4, Place 1. Other bids
received were from Advanced Business Equipment, Inc., Kraft Furniture
Co.. A bid was received from Engineering And Office Supply, too late
to be opened.
The Court gave further consideration to bids for typewriters for
the Courthouse. On motion by Commissioner Cooley, seconded by Comm-
issioner Sims, the Court voted unanimously to accept the low bid of
IBM in the total amount of $1,107.00 for two (2) model D typewriters
with a 160 carriage.
SAE•E15y
14 T
l
v N AGE 6 n
. I
The next item for consideration was bids for two (2) new auto-
mobiles for the Sheriff's Department. On motion by Commissioner j
Stasny, seconded by Commissioners,Cooley, the Court voted unanimously
to accept the low bid of Corbusier Chevrolet Co. in the amount of
$9,318.00, less trade in of $950.00 for a 1972 Pontiac and $1,500.00
j
trade in on a 1973 Pontiac for a total price to the County of $6,868.00:,-",
other bids received were from Beal Ford in the amount of $7,943.64,
Allen Oldsmobile Cadillac, Inc. in the amount of $8,066.62. A "no
bid" was received from Halsell Motor Co., Inc. along with a letter
requesting a two week advance notice of bids.
On motion by Commissioner Stasny, seconded by Commissioner
Wilcox, the Court voted unanimously to pay the expenses of Foster
Care in the amount of $1,172.40 with a.reimbursement from the State
Department of Public Welfare in the amount of $1,528.77.
On motion by Commissioner Cooley, seconded by Commissioner
Stasny, the Court voted unanimously to pay the annual dues of Brazos
County to the County Judges And Commissioners Associaton of Texas in
the amount of $100.00
The County Judge informed the Court of three (3) vacancies on
the Brazos County,Child Welfare Board, and that a letter had been
received from Mrs. Thelma vanOverbeek, Chairman suggesting the
following persons be appointed:- Rev. Hubert Beck, Mr. Jesse Vivero,
and Dr. Larry Keeley. On motion by Commissioner Stasny, seconded by
Commissioner Wilcox, the Court voted unanimously to appoint Mr. Jesse
Vivero for a one year term ending December 31, 1975 to fill the vac-
ancy created by the death of Betty Taylor and Rev. Hubert Beck and
Dr-: Larry Keeley for three year terms each, ending December 31, 1977.
1 w.
r` S1
The next matter for consideration was the proposal by South/West
Planning Associates for services in the preparation of the County's
Community Development pre-application as required by HUD. On motion
by Commissioner Cooley, seconded by Commissioner Sims, the Court
voted unanimously to accept such proposal. A copy of such proposal
is attached to and made a part of these minutes.
District Attorney, W. T. McDonald, Jr., president of the Bar
Association of Brazos County presented the Court with the tabulation
of the survey of the Bar Associaton on the creation of additional
Courts in Brazos County. After consideration of the survey, Commissioner
Sims moved that Brazos County adopt a Resolution opposing the proposed
County Court At Law. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Wilcox
and carried unanimously. A copy of such Resolution is attached to
and made a part of these minutes.
The Court having hereto for requested that the County Attorney
advise the Court whether or not authority exisits for the payment of
a car allowance to the District Judger the County Attorney reported
that in his opinion, supported by prior opinion of the Attorney
General H 96 and H 152, no authority exists under present law for
such car allowance when not related to the number of miles actually
trav6l•dd Commissioner Wilcox therefore moved that the County Auditor
be instructed to discontinue such payment. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Cooley, and carried unanimously.
The Tax Assessor Collector next presented for approval, Certificates
of Cancellation numbers 8130 and 8131. On motion by Commissioner
Sims, seconded by Commissioner Wilcox, the Court voted unanimously to
approve such cancellations.
pAG~161
VOLN-
VOLK' , I
On montion by Commissioner Sims, seconded by Commissioner J
• I,
Wilcox, the Court voted unanimously to approve claims 242 through
379 presented by the'County Auditor for payment.
t
. 1
On motion by Commissioner Sims, seconded by Commissioner
Cooley, the Court voted unanimously to approve cliams 12 through
25 for Precinct 1, claims 16 through 27 for Precinct 3 and j
' I
claims 28 through 58 for Precinct 2,-presented by the County i'
Auditor for payment. I i
s
There being no further business, the Court adjourned.
J
The foregoing minutes were examined in open Court and approved on '
the 1U day of March 197 5
• J
i am R. Vance -Bill J oo ey ;
County Judge Commissioner, Pct. 1 ,
a ter 1 cox an, y iu~e
Commissioner, Pct. 2 C_ommiss ner, Pct. 3 {
ATT
I
asn •
ran or4 ie
Commissioner, Pct. County Clerk
• ~ f
I 1 ,
}
-77 -F,r
~ . ~ ~ 4` ,t : h r , C jr.... wr• . • 7 •-'.7 _ i.. :mgr. n.~.~~.~_._--~.-.._.
, I
RESOLUTION
T.1LIT+n ~ A n .•1...f%- , -r r n _ •
•••••+•..aav vvuaua+u.~l i.Val~r$ v~/uL 1.. 1101 LCCII advlSed Lh.&L 1C9lb1d L.1ULL
has been introduced which would create a County Court At Law of Brazos
County and would terminate the existing Civil and Criminal jurisdiction
of the County Court of Brazos County, and
WHEREAS such legislation provides that such County Court At Law
would have jurisdiction over juvenile matters in spite of the fact that
present law vests exclusive jurisdition of juvenile matters in the
District Court of Brazos County, and
WHEREAS the creation of a County Court At Law is usually requested
by County Officials for the purpose of (1) providing a Court in which
the Judge is required to be a practicing Attorney or (2)handling a case
load which is too great for the constitutional County Judge to handle
in addition to his administrative duties as presiding officer of the
Commissioners' Court, and
WHEREAS the Commissioners' Court has determined that neither of the
problems stated in the foregoing paragraph exist in Brazos County at the
present time, and
WHEREAS the Commissioners' Court has agreed with the present County
Judge to pay a salary comensurate with full time service effective
January 1, 1976, in order to insure that both the administrative duties
and judicial duties of the present County Judge can be properly discharged
through full time service, and
WHEREAS the Commissioners Court has determined that the creation of
a County Court At Law would result in an increase in the budget of
approximately $75,000.00 for the first year and $60,000.00 per year for
each year thereafter, to provide for salaries, clerical help, court
reporting services and office space and equipment, which expenditures
the Commissioners' Court feel are both unnecessary and unwarranted in
light of the present caseload which would be handled by such a County
Court at law, and
WHEREAS the Commissioners' Court is desirous of advising the tax i
paying public and our elected representatives of the foregoing facts
and of'its opposition to the enactment'of such legislation, now, therefore i
. i
BE IT RESOLVED by the Commissioners' Court as follows:
• i
(1) That the Commissioners' Court is opposed to the
enactment of Senate Bill No. 87 by the Legislature
as•an unnecessary and unwarranted creation of a
County Court At Law and expenditures of funds, and i
(2) That the Commissioners' Court calls upon all inter-
ested tay paying citizens of Brazos County to oppose ti
this legislation, and
(3) That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to our ~
elected officials with a request that such legislation
not be enacted at this time.
ADOPTED THIS THE 10th day of Februar -1 75. /ast-c •L.
i iam R. Vance, County Judge
i
Bill J'. ooley, omm'ss oner o Pct. I I]
Waite- r Wilcox, Commissioner of M7 72-
V7'7-)
Ran y Sibs, Commissioner o Pct.
W. A. S tasny, Commis loner o ct...
IJ
• '1 i"•.:;t- , ',y.'C , .!•.`i :b ,-%nv'Kyyn„.~•.~}P.'_-r'.'~'..~T,.r•~,yT ,c.• .-.r .y+ '+y
y113.Y~~{, /~~~(,.YW a,~A'jf, ..I'rlf.. t{~~~t(~.`.J~r tiSJ~ • ~
,t
~ It.. j4 •~i~ nFr ~r•TT rJ. 1 .
. 1
•
s®uth/West planning associates inc.
.
planning-architectureeengineering•program management
6o1ea sulphur springs road.bryan,texas 77801.713/823.0368
Februcry 5, 1975
Judge W. R. Vance, County Judge
Brazos County Commissioners
County Courthouse
Bryan, Texas 77801
Re: Proposal for Professional Services
Community Development Program
Brazos County, Texas
Dear Judge Vance:
Austin County, Texas
Bastrop, Texas
Burnet, Texas
Coll, Colombia S.A.
Cameron, Texas
'Corri-o Springs, Texas
C. E. Ball Properties, Bryan,
Texas
Clyde, Texas
College Station, Texas
Eagle Pass, Texas
Eagle Pass Boys' Clvb
Eagle Pcss
Chamber of Commerce
Eagle Pass
Model Cities Agency
fdinburg, Texas
Fort Duncan Restoration,
Eagle Pass, Texas
Gronbury, Texas
Gregory, Texas
Hereford, Texas
Houston County, Texas
Houston Model Cities
Agency
League City, Texas
Lester Properties
Bryan, Teaos
Livingston, texas
Lockhart, Texas
LRGVDC, McAllen, Texas
tAexia, Texas
tA.RGDC, Del Rio, Texas
Nosh Phillips{opus,
Austin, Texas
Natchitoches. Louisiana
New Iberia, Louisiana
Nixon, Texas
Onolosko, Texas
Pharr, Texas
Polk County, Texas
Ponger, Texas
R;churd Smith Company,
Bryan, Texas
San Benito, Texas
Sealy, Texas
Seguin, Texas
Snyder, Texas
WCTCOG, Abilene, Texas
Willis, Texas
JOSEPH J. McGRAW, MTPIC, AIP
RAY E. ABBOTT, AIP
FPvf%r'A 1 ~1it 7111 Irr Mi•~r •f.
KENNETH L. AUSTIN, ARCHITECT
NIKKI A. TUCKER, FINANCE OFFICER
ROBERT W. WIMBISH, ASSOCIATE AIP
CALVIN WOODS, PE.
Thank you for the opportunity to visit with the Court in regard to Brazos County's
participation in the Community Development Program. We appreciate this chance
to work with you for the improvement and growth of Brazos County.
Approach
It is an understandable and common goal of County officials that a capable,
experienced staff be developed so that effective and directed administration of
programs can be realized. This is no less the case with your Community Development
Program. We recommend, therefore, and are prepared to provide services which
will actually supplement staff and commissioners court action. In this relationship
we will provide both general and specific services as they are needed, to prepare
the County's Community Development pre-application. We also understand that
this pre-application serves as the preliminary step utilized by HUD in determining
funding priorities for discretionary grant applicants.
Scope of Consultant Participation
It is our intention trr'provide Brazos County with professional services necessary
to prepare the County's Community Development pre-application based on
available information and forms in such a manner as to be acceptable to HUD,
Dallas area office. We will be working with County staff and commissioners
in order to provide HUD with required documents. Our firm is prepared to work
with HUD officials as necessary to obtain their recommendation that the County
prepare and submit an application for Community Development discretionary
funds.
vo ~
_ , . _ ..1-.- a.T..l~usecy._w.:.rcal.+:L ..,pL . ._i ~C _ z... :,w.. - _ _ .
• Proposal '
Brazos County------page 2------Fe bruary b, 1975
• f X66
- ilOULPpGE~ .I
Upon this favorable recommendation by HUD we are prepared to renegotiate this
agreement so as to provide the services necessary for preparing all required r
o•ro ~nnlmo 'nn.. i~n~t~.. t....l_
P.IAr11PI1tc of r1 rnMm1,ni t, n ' n t ~~1. • tr... SMS
r••"iJ.'1
1 dl ci..•w1w1, 1V11MIA ,
under the Housing and Community De velopment Act of 1974, f
}
r
f
Overall Direction of Work
R. W. Wimbish, Vice President, who is State-certified as a qualified Planner-in- I
Charge for HUD-assisted planning and management programs will be assisted by i
Cindy Reinhardt, Program Director of South/West Planning Associates. Mr. Wimbish
will be responsible for overall coordination and application of the firm's personnel i.
and resources in this project. Ms. Reinhardt brings to this project-her invaluable {
experience in HUD's various community development programs. (See attached
brochure).
I i
Cost Estimate, Schedule of Work, and Billing Procedure I t
I
i
We propose to bill Brazos County for work accomplished according to the attached
standard fee schedule. Based on our past experience and the existing Federal I
requirements as of February 5, 1975, the cost to the County for our firm performing {
all of the services outlined above for the pre-application will not exceed $500.00
up to the point of submitting the required pre-application to HUD no later than
March 1, 1975.
We trust this proposal and Letter of Agreement meets with the Commissioner's court
approval. If this agreement form is acceptable to you (it is to us) please sign both
copies and return one for our files, c
f
We are prepared to begin work immediately.
Sincerely, ,
SOUTH EST PLANNING ASSOCIATES, `l
7 • r
Robert im is , ssoc. P Cindy Li Rein ardt, Assoc. AIP
Planner-in4Charge Program Director , j
F /Brazo/County ,
R. Vance, County Judge Date `
Attachment: Standard Fee Schedule f II
Brochure
' - _ _ ' . ~ -
r ~ i 1_ r. •s,
{,,1 ~~'P, f^__(.
f~' : ~ ~e_•'_"`'_S;f'
,i; ^~_.._,.~~-~,n _ I•r-. -
,
.
1
t
1,0
STANDARD FEE SCHEDULE
'`the compensation of SOUTHWEST PLANNING ASSOCIATES for work done on the basis of
salary costs times a factor, plus incurred expenses (which may be referred to as "time and
materials", or "standard billing") will be sum of all the items set forth below: '
A. CONSULTATION & SALARY:
For services rendered outside our offices, the following daily fees shall apply:
Staff Classification, Daily Fees
Principal $180.00 i
Staff Associates $140.00
Para Professionals $100.00
These daily fees apply only to time in the field away from our offices. Working time
in excess of 8 hours per day or 40 hours per week, such overtime will be billed of
115% of the above rates.
For services rendered in ot►r offices, the following hourly fees apply:
Staff Classification Hourly Fees
Principal $22.50/hr.
Staff Associates $17.50/hr.
Statistical Analyst $15.00/hr.
REseorch Staff $15.00/hr.
Technical Writers $15.00/hr.
Draftsmen $12.50 /hr. i
Clerical $ 9.00/hr.
B. TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION EXPENSES f
1. Reimbursement for actual travel and subsistence expenses paid to or on behalf of employees.
2. 16 cents per mile for use of SOUTHWEST PLANNING ASSOCIATES' vehicles.
C. OUTSIDE SERVICES
Invoice costs of services and expenses charged to SOUTHWEST PLANNING ASSOCIATES
by outside consultants, professional or technical firms engaged in connection with the
order, plus 10% overheod,costs.
D. REPRODUCTION AND PRINTING SERVICES
The invoice costs of reproduction and printing services done for SOUTH/MEST PLANNING
ASSOCIATES clients plus handling charge.
E.' MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
The invoice cost of materials, supplies and services, including communication expenses,
procured by SOUTHWEST PLANNING ASSOCIATES from outside sources. All
out-of-pocket expenses not included in items A, B, C, or D will be included in this
category.
F. METHOD OF BILLING
Unless otherwise provided, billings will be made monthly as the work progresses. All
invoices are payable when submitted. SOUTHWEST PLANNING ASSOCIATES reserves
the right to charge interest at 10% per year on balances unpaid after 30 days, plus
reasonable attorney fees in the event some are incurred in making collections.
~v®