Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1958-10-13-1000AM-Regular220 i .y r i ~ - • 1 R y i 'i r r~ r, • asetL• Neat ir~ -October ?4a 19SB0 A regular sw4bg of the Commissioners Court of Bramoe Comity, Twee, we held in the Caseissionwe Courtroom is the courthouse, at Bryan, beStanimg at IWO older s a. m., an Nooday, October 13, 1958, with the *lloring presents A. 8. Mare, County Judge, prssi+diogi Raymond A. Nolen, Commissioner of Precinct Number 11 Osorge Atop, Commissioner of Precinct Number 21 Clyde J. Porterfield, Commissioner of Precinct Number 31 Newton Burlier, Commissioner of Precinct Number 41 and A. B. 9yptak, County Clerk. The Court received, approved and ordered filed as Submitted the follotsiag rsparter Brazos County Welfare Bawd by M. D. Burley, Chairman, for the month of September, 1958 M. D. Burley, County Veterans Service Officer, for the month of September, 1958 Bernard J. Vogalgeaang, Probation Officer, for the month of September, 1958 Bryan4krasoe County Health Unit, for the month of August, 1958 Fannie J. Tqlor, Negro County Now Demonstration Agent, for the month of September, 1958 Z. 0. Pace, Negro County Agricultural Agent, for the month of September, 1958. The Court received, considered and approved the fol3oving rspsrte fm aomty and precinct officers showing official fees of office collected and remitted to the County Treasurer according to duplicate copies of Treasurer's offiaial receipts attached thsrstos A. S. Were, County Judge . . . . . . . . . . . . J".50 A. D. Syptak, County Clerk . . . . . . . . . •2,044.15 J. M. Hamilton, Sheriff . . . . . . . . . . 831.00 John M. Barron, County Attorney . . . ...2,083.80 Raymond S. Buchanan, Tax Aseessor-Collector . . . 188.35 B. L. Graham, Justice of Peace of Precinct 4, Place Is Pees collected and remitted to Brazos County. . . . .1,574.05 Pees to be paid by County for 170 cases • $4.00 each. • 680.00 Virgil Setill, Constable of Precinct No. 4t Fees collected and remitted to Brame County. . . . . . . 8.00. The County Judge laid before the Court the contract received by his on October ~ 1,"1958, after its initial approval on May 6, 19582 cfor cooperative wort udth the Brasov County office of the Agricultural Conservation Program Service. On motion dully seconded and unanimously adopted, this contract was approved and ordered recorded In the minutes, Y follower r •Fors ACP-230 (Revised 10-9-56) UNITED STATES DEPARTYW OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Conservation Program Service AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FUSHISHING OF WNSERVATION MATERIALS AND SERVICES UNDER THS PURCHASE ORDER PUN To Chairman Brazos Committee, Box 706, Bryan, Texas a Sirs I, sometimes referred to herein as the vendor, desire to participate In the furnishing under purchase orders of approved conservation materials and/or y Services to farmers in the county for their use in carrying out practices 11 I c 1 1 ~ t 1 221 airier the Agricultural Conservation Program and/or the Conservation Reserve Program and hereby request approval as an eligible vendor for ouch purposes. , The following information is supplied fbr your guidance in considering my applications F Brazos County Bryan, Texas • The following are the principal owners of the firms • f Raymond A. Nolan, Commissioner, Precinct No. 1, Wellborn, Tessa George R. Dann, Commissioner, Precinct No. 2, Wheelock, Texas , ' Clyde Porterfield, Coml sioner, Precinct No. 30 Rt. 1, Banchls y, Texas ` Newton Burlin Commissioner Precinct No. 4 1907 Nuche's Lane r , , , Bryan, Seas. " A. In consideration of the approval of this application the ` vendor represents and agrees as follower t t .a y 1. That he will acquaint himself with the regulations and + instructions issued by the applicable State and County committees for the furnishing of materials and services under purchase orders ° and he will act only in conformity therewith. a 2. That no employees of this firm, except as disclosed herein, ` a receives any remuneration as an employee of the Federal Government or as State, County, or camremlty committeemen or employees of the County ~ 4= committee. •t 3. That he will not seek to secure any advantage w preferred consideration in the obtaining of purchase orders by the offer of or the ? giving of any valuable consideration to any officer or employes of the State or County office or any other Government employee. C is. That, upon request of a duly authorised representative of the U. S. Department of Agriculture to examine pertinent records of the firm, be will permit such examination of all such records and will maintain adequate records to permit verification of purchase order transactions. S. That he will not assign to a bank, trn et company, Federal lendlog „ agency, or other recognized lending institution, any amount payable for , materials or services delivered an a purchase order. • B. In conneation with the filling of purchase orders the vendor further agreess ~F 6. That he will furnish under purchase orders only materials and services which meet the specifications set out on each purchase orders, ' and that he will comply with all Federal and State laws governing the sale and distribution of the material or service so furnished pursuant to such purchase orders. ° 7. That title to any material or service furnished to farmers under purchase orders shall vest in the United States Government, and the vendor r shall not exact from the farmer to whom such material or service is furnished w any conditional sales contract or other agreement having the effect of retention of title or right of repossession in the vendor. S. That he will deliver the material or service specified In each purchase order to the person who is named therein or his authorised agent, and to no other. 9. That he will not collect from the farmer any mount for furnishing ` the material or service in excess of the arm specified on the purchase order, if a maximum fair price is applicable, and that if a lesser quantity or grade Is furnished than authorized on the purchase order he will refer the porch" rh order to the County Bffice for a determination of the payment to be made by the farmer and the Government for such material or service. t'•- c} 10. That he will not request or permit the farmer to receipt 1br the { material or service authorized to be furnished on the pr chase order before actual physical delivery thereof in entirety to the farmer or his authorised ' agent is completed. i 11. That he will not affix or permit any one other than the farmer • or his authorized representative to affix the signature of the farmer an the , purchase order or other form or statement evidencing receipt, of the material or service. 12. That he will not permit or contribute to the substitution of any r t k • other material or service in lieu of that specified on such purchase order. s 13. That he will not deliver any lesser quantity or quality of asterlal or service than authorized on a purchase order in order to permit the farmer thereby to reduce his contribution. 1b. That he will not deliver the material or service after the final date specified on the purchase order for completion of delivery. i is. That in the delivery of materials and services authorized on a purchase order he will not deliver material or service of an inferior quality or deliver lees than authorised thereon and claim payment for the greater quantity or quality authorised to be furnished an mob parches ti at a sh'y' Sti . F *`tt 4.T °er w . 211 k~ } I i I ' I ~ _t , a 1 order. It Is understood that should a lesser quantity or quality be delivered than is authorised an the purchase order, the vendor will enter the actual quantity and quality delivered and refer the purchase order to the county office for am rection in the payment by the farmer and Government. It is further understood that it it is found that a looser grade of material or service is furnished than authorised on the purchase order, such material or service may be rejected and the vendor shall not be entitled to payment therefor by the Government. At the option of the State committee such materials or services may be accepted and payment made therefor subject to a deduction equal to the difference between the fair price, if applicable, or the going commercial price, if a fair price is not applicable, of the material or service of the quality specified and the value of the material or service furnished. Where it is determined by the State committee that the purchase order was wilfully misused, any material or service authorised an the purchase order may be rejected and the vendor shall not be entitled to payment therefor by the Government] provided, that where it is accepted$ the credit to which the vendor is entitled from the Government shall not exceed the amount of the Government's share of the cost of such materials or services accepted by the Government under the purchase order. In no case will payment be made for a material or service furnished on purchase order which does not meet the minimum specifications for carrying out the practice as set out In the State program bandbook. It is understood and agreed that in the event the vendee shall wilfully use any purchase order contrary to the foregoing, the actual damage to the Government for such misuse will be impossible to determine, particularly since the vendor Is also furnishing materials and services on other pur- chase orders which could also have been misused, the vendor in lieu of actual damages shall be liable to the Government fbr fixed, agreed, and liquidated damages in the amount of the fair price, if one is applicable, or the going commercial price, if a fair price is not applicable, of the total quantity of the material or service authorised to be furnished on each purchase order misused, and the vendor shall pay the amount thereof. Such damages shall be assessed and collected by the State committee only after the vendor has been given an opportunity to be heard by the committee and to present ouch facts as may explain the circumstances, and the decision of the State committee as to whether there was a misuse and whether it was wilful shall be final and conclusive. It is understood that the assessment and collection of liquidated damages shall in no way bar or mitigate any other remedies the Government may have for breach of any other provisions of this agreement or for any violations of the Federal statutes. It is further understood that if the vendor intentionally misuses purchase orders contrary to the foregoing, the State committee may declare him in. eligible to fill purchase orders for a specified period, the period to be determined by the nature and gravity of the unauthorised or otherwise improper activities to which he was a party. No member of or delegate to Congress, or resident commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of this agreement, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom= but this provision shall not be construed to extend to this agreement if made with a corporation for its general benefit. { r ^ Brazos County, Tamers Signed Byr e A S. Ware -6- B . S. Wars Vendor County Judge Date ' Approved /s/ H. C. Seale For County Committee eta).- Commissioner Burlfn presented his claim for reimbursement for cash spent In commotion with the annual conference of the County Judges and Commissioners Association at Dallas, on October 6 through 9, 1958, amounting to $68.00, as shown by itemized statement. On motion duly seconded and unanimously adopted, the Court ordered this account paid. In connection with the acquisition of rights-of-W for State farm-to-wrist highways heretofore approved and surveyed by the State Highway Fagineers, on motion defy seconded and unanimously adopted, the Court voted to authorise the filing and prosecution of condemnation proceedings, as follower For extension of Farm-to-Market Highway No. 60, from College Station to intersect with Farm-te-tlarket Highway No. 158 In the vicinity of Har►eyr Arnold Schultz and wife Maydell Sahultsi Joe Daminik and wife Antonia Doednikf Albert Dominik and wife Louts DoednUl and Victor Dumlaik. 1[ K[ 11L 11E ' - r<.-r....T~ :;c., y.,oPa'=s,E~!la;«.;.L'2~., :ue.wrs=R1Q ~L ~vk 7~'l .r.+tcz «w. 222 October 13- November 3-6, 1958. • 1-11 • • r~ On motion duly seconded and unanimously adopted, the Court toted to pay all bills Y which have been properly filed. - ; Whereupon the Court adjourned. Special Meeting - November 9. 1958. A special meeting of the Commissioners Court of Brazes County, Tony was held in the office of the County Judge in the courthouse, at Bryan, beginning aA 8t30 o'clock a. 84, on lleaday, November 3, 1958, with the following presents A. S. Mare, County Judge, presiding] Raymond A. Nolan, Commissioner of Precinct No. 11 Clyde J. Porterfield, Commissioner of Precinct No. 3i sad j Newton Barlin, Commissioner of Precinct No. 4. ..1 Ths Court received the following resignation submitted by M. A. Lawless, Justice of the Peace of Justice Precinct No. 3, of Brazos County, Te=as, an October 13, 1958, after the regular meeting of the Commissioners Courtt uxurten, Texas, Oct.- 13 - 1958 To County Judge k Com edealoners , oft Brazos County Please accept my resignation as Justice of Peace oft Pre't i3 effective Oct. - 15 - 1958. /s/ M. A. Lawless J. P. Prc't $3 Brazos Co. Twms.e On motion duly seconded and unanimously adopted, the Court accepted the resignation as submitted to be effective from October 15, 1958. On motion duly seconded and unanimously adopted, the Court voted to authorise condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of the neoessary fats-to-market stab higtrweq rightaf-way as surveyed and staked out by highway engineers, as followes For State Para-to-Market Highway No. 2513, locally known as the Turkey Creek Roadt M. L. Boyett, H. T. Rolland and wife Clara L. Holland. The Court received and approved the report of the Brazos County Health Unit far the mouth of September, 1958. Whereupon the Court adjouanpd. e+cr• a•e+a+rae+awe,e, e+e Special Meeting - November 6. 1958Moeting - November 6. 1958. A special meeting of the Commissioners Court was held in the office of the Ccunty Judge, beginning at 8s3o a* not on Thursday, Nonaber 6, 19580 with all members of the Court present, who proceeded to canvass the returns of the General Election held on Shesday, November 4, 1958. These returns were carefully chocked, tabulated and recorded in Volume •Cs, an Pages 62 to 71, inolusive, of the Official Election Returns of Brazos County, on file In the office of the Court Clerk. t - Whereupon the Court a4jonrned. E ' r -