Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025/05/06 Regular Session 10:00 AM x��tiE c?fiA t r qq cok 0 MAY 1�1 f9 i� -�� � g 5� y BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION ON MAY 6, 2025 AT 10:00 AM IN THE COMMISSIONERS COURTROOM OF THE BRAZOS COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 200 S. TEXAS AVENUE, SUITE 106, BRYAN, TX 77803 THE PUBLIC MAY WATCH THE MEETING LIVE ON THE BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT YOUTUBE CHANNEL AT: HTT PS://WWW.YOUT U BE.COM/@BRAZOSCOU NTY3227. • 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 0 U.S. and Texas Flag - Commissioner Bentley 2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns Consider and take action on agenda items: 3 -19 3. Approval of Proclamation 25-022 proclaiming May 4-10, 2025 as National Correctional Officers and Employees Week. 4. Approval of Proclamation 25-023 proclaiming May 6-12, 2025 as National Nurses Recognition Week. 5. Approval requested from Human Resources for acceptance of two (2)$100 Walmart gift cards from Wilton's Office Works to be used for purchases for the Health& Safety Expo on June 5, 2025 benefiting employees of Brazos County, City of College Station, and City of Bryan. 6. Approval requested from Human Resources for acceptance of a monetary donation in the amount of$300.00 from I nsurors of Texas to be used for purchases for the Health& Safety Expo on June 5, 2025 benefiting employees of Brazos County, City of College Station, and City of Bryan. 7. Approval of Agreement#25-111 with The LaSalle Hotel for Brazos County. 8. Approval of#25-123 BuildingReports.com Membership Agreement. 9. Award of RFQ#CIP 25-529 Architect for Ashford Hills Warehouse & Office Suites. Recommended Award: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. 10. Approval of No Award for RFP#CIP 25-562 Construction Manager at Risk for Ashford Hills Warehouse & Office Suites due to changing the project to a design-bid-build bidding process. 11. Approval of No Award for RFP#CI P 25-571 Compensation& Benefits Study due to lack of qualified proposal responses. 12. Permission to Re-Advertise CI P 25-571 Compensation& Benefits Study. 13. Approval of CIP#25-599 Commissioning Services for Ashford Hills warehouse and office suites with Tom Green& Company Engineers, Inc.for$81,430.00. 14. Consider and take action on the Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU)cost estimate of$6,224.66 to relocate existing pole and guy wire. This work is needed in order to accommodate the proposed widening of Koppe Bridge Road. Site is located in Precinct 1. 15. Consider and take action on the Frontier Communications utility permit to install 3,800 feet of fiber optic conduits within the right-of-way of Shirley Road. Project also includes road bores of Shirley Road, Bourbon Lane and Whiskey River Road. Site is located in Precinct 2. 16. Approval of the Treasurer's Report for February 2025. 17. Budget Amendments. o FY 24/25 Budget Amendments 29.01 -29.06 18. Personnel Change of Status. O Approval of Personnel Change of Status 19. Payment of Claims. Approval of Payment of Claims: • a. 8209437-8209543 • b. 9204246-9204322 20. Acknowledgement of the Brazos County Sheriff's Office SB22 Rural Law Enforcement Grant expenditures in the amount of$212,000 for the following, Commercial Motor Vehicle Enforcement Truck, Safety Grill Guards and Firearms. 21. Acknowledgement of the Monthly Report from the County Auditor for February 2025. 22. Acknowledgement of the State Inspector's Reports for the November 2024 General Election. 23. Acknowledgement of the FY 2024-2025 Budget to Actuals by Fund as of April 30, 2025. Acknowledgement of the FY 2024-2025 Contingency Budget to Actuals by Fund as of April 30, 2025. 24. Juvenile director's report on detention population. 25. Sheriff's report on inmate population. 26. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics. 27. Adjourn. PUBLIC COMMENTS Public Comment during the Commission Meeting may be for all matters,both on and off the agenda,and be limited to four minutes per person. Public participation sign-up sheets must be submitted at least five(5)minutes prior to the start of the posted meeting time. Persons are invited to submit comments in writing on the agenda items and/or attend and make comment at the Commission meeting. Members of the public are reminded that the Brazos County Commissioners Court is a Constitutional Court,with both judicial and legislative powers,created under Article V,Section 1 and Section 18 of the Texas Constitution.As a Constitutional Court,the Brazos County Commissioners Court also possesses the power to issue a Contempt of Court Citation under Section 81.023 of the Texas Local Government Code.Accordingly,members of the public in attendance at any Regular,Special and/or Emergency meeting of the Court shall conduct themselves with proper respect and decorum in speaking to,and/or addressing the Court;in participating in public discussions before the Court;and in all actions in the presence of the Court.Those members of the public wtio are inappropriately attired and/or who do not conduct themselves in an orderly and appropriate manner will be ordered to leave the meeting. Refusal to abide by the Court's Order and/or continued disruption of the meeting may result in a Contempt of Court Citation. It is not the intention of the Brazos County Commissioners Court to provide a public forum for the demeaning of any individual or group.Neither is it the intention of the Court to allow a member(or members)of the public to insult the honesty and/or integrity of the Court,as a body,or any member or members of the Court,or County employees,individually or collectively.Accordingly, profane,insulting or threatening language directed toward the Court and/or any person in the Court's presence and/or racial, ethnic or gender slurs or epithets will not be tolerated.Violation of these rules may result in the following sanctions: 1.cancellation of a speaker's time; 2.removal from the Commissioners Court; 3.a Contempt Citation;and/or 4.such other and/or criminal sanctions as may be authorized under the Constitution,Statutes and Codes of the State of Texas. The County Commissioners Court can deliberate or take action only if a matter has been listed on an agenda properly posted prior to the meeting. During the public comment period,speakers may address matters not listed on the published agenda.The Open Meeting Law does not expressly prohibit responses to public comments by the Commissioners Court. However,responses from the County Judge or Commissioners to unlisted public comment topics could become deliberation on a matter without notice to the public.To ensure the public has notice of all matters the Commissioners Court will consider,the County Judge and/or Commissioners may choose not to respond to public comments,except to correct factual inaccuracies,recite existing policy in response to an inquiry or to ask that a matter be listed on a future agenda.See Texas Open Meetings Act Section 551.042. INVOCA11ON Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Court meeting shall be to and for the benefit of the Court.The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Court and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Court in part or as a whole.No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Court. The Commissioners Courtroom of the Brazos County Administration Building,200 S.Texas Avenue,Suite 106, Bryan,TX77803 is wheelchair accessible.Handicap parking spaces are available.Any request for sign interpretive services must be made two working days before the meeting.To make arrangements, please call(979)361-4102. )riiiit The foregoing minutes of the Commissioners Court Meeting held May 6, 2025, have been examined and are approved in open Court this 10th day of June 2025, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas. IA "SW , Duane Peters Bentley Ne tl County Judge - Commissioner, Precinct 1 Chuck Konderla red Brown Commissioner, Precinct 2 Commissioner, Precinct 3 • f1 IkAiNt_ ii, Wanda J. W, tson Commissio -r, P -cinct 4 f Go. 1-�of' P 9-0 Th Attest: q(01/4J...0_—___AYI CaLsb,----- Karen McQueen 9L0 County Clerk ." .e . p 5 MINUTES MAY 6, 2025 BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT REGULAR MEETING A regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court of Brazos County, Texas was held in the Brazos County Commissioners Courtroom in the Administration Building, 200 South Texas Avenue, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas, beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 6, 2025 with the following members of the Court present: Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding; Bentley Nettles, Commissioner of Precinct 1; Chuck Konderla, Commissioner of Precinct 2; Fred Brown, Commissioner of Precinct 3; Wanda J. Watson, Commissioner of Precinct 4; Karen McQueen, County Clerk,Absent The attached sheets contain the names of the citizens and officials that were in attendance. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance • U.S. and Texas Flag - Commissioner Nettles 2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns Wyllys Cooper expressed his continued opposition to the East Loop Project. Mr. Cooper requested traffic studies that show the need for the East Loop. Bobby Rosier is protesting the East Loop Project due to lack of necessity. Mr. Rosier stated his disappointment in the Court's support of the project. Robert Johnson expressed his continued opposition to the East Loop Project and concerns of a lack of transparency from the Court. Charles Mancuso thanked the former Commissioners for their service and welcomed the new Commissioners. Mr. Mancuso then stated his opposition to the East Loop Project and requested the Court's support in resolving a sewage issue and excessive trash burning that is directly affecting his property. He thanked the first responders that assisted with the matter. Sabryna Brown advocated for management of the community cat population. She reminded the public about the Dine to Donate fundraiser for the Bryan Animal Center on May 6, 2025 at Texas Roadhouse. Cathie Viens requested that the Budget workshops be live streamed and that the County website include a list of the various boards and committees that the Court members serve on.Additionally, Ms. Viens explained the reason for her involvement in County government and then questioned when the new voting precincts will go into effect. Cherise Ratliff discussed the impact the East Loop will have on her family's rural and agricultural lifestyle. Ms. Ratliff questioned the necessity of the project. Kyle Greenwood expressed continued opposition to the East Loop Project and concerns of lack of transparency. Mr. Greenwood formally requested that the public comment period be extended to allow the community more time to discuss the matter and have their voices heard. Mr. Greenwood provided an official letter with his request, it is attached hereto. General Counsel Bruce Era provided clarification for a statement made during a previous Commissioners Court meeting in response to a citizen's comments regarding the East Loop Project. Consider and take action on agenda items: 3 -19 3. Approval of Proclamation 25-022 proclaiming May 4-10, 2025 as National Correctional Officers and Employees Week. The County Judge read aloud Proclamation 25-022 designating the week of May 4 - May 10, 2025, National Correctional Officers and Employees week. Sheriff Wayne Dicky, thanked the Correctional Officers for their service and commitment. Dr. Tanisha Hall, Warden of Federal Prison Camp Bryan, congratulated and thanked all of our Correctional Officers on a job well done. Dr. Hall shared her gratitude saying, "if you don't work within the wall of a correctional facility you don't know what they go through. It is because of them that you and I can sleep well at night." Juvenile Detention Center Superintendent Chris Coffey also shared his gratitude to all the staff for their service and dedication. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Chuck Konderla, Seconded by Commissioner Bentley Nettles. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 4. Approval of Proclamation 25-023 proclaiming May 6-12, 2025 as National Nurses Recognition Week. The County Judge read aloud Proclamation 25-023 designating the week of May 6 - May 12, 2025, National Nurses Week. Brazos County wants to recognize all Nurses in the Community as well as in Corrections for their acts of heroism, compassion, dedication to duty and commitment to our community. Julie Anderson from the Brazos County Health and Wellness Clinic,thanked her team for their service and dedication. She also thanked Sheriff Dicky and the Court for their support. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Chuck Konderla, Seconded by Commissioner Fred Brown. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 5. Approval requested from Human Resources for acceptance of two (2)$100 Walmart gift cards from Wilton's Office Works to be used for purchases for the Health& Safety Expo on June 5, 2025 benefiting employees of Brazos County, City of College Station, and City of Bryan. A copy of the donation form is attached. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Chuck Konderla, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 6. Approval requested from Human Resources for acceptance of a monetary donation in the amount of$300.00 from I nsurors of Texas to be used for purchases for the Health& Safety Expo on June 5, 2025 benefiting employees of Brazos County,City of College Station, and City of Bryan. A copy of the donation form is attached. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Chuck Konderla, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 7. Approval of Agreement#25-111 with The LaSalle Hotel for Brazos County. A copy of the agreement is attached. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 8. Approval of#25-123 BuildingReports.com Membership Agreement. A copy of the agreement is attached. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson, Seconded by Commissioner Bentley Nettles. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 9. Award of RFQ#CI P 25-529 Architect for Ashford Hills Warehouse & Office Suites. Recommended Award: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. Cathie Viens requested a brief review of the purpose and funding of the project. Judge Peters stated that an explanation would be provided. Jody Quimby questioned why the County is contracting with an Architect and not a Construction Manager at Risk. Purchasing Agent Charles Wendt explained that the plan is to just do the design of the building at this time. The building would not be constructed until a later date when funding is in place. Commissioner Brown expressed concerns about moving forward with this project. Mr. Wendt shared that the purpose of the project is to be a central receiving location for the County. Commissioner Nettles requested additional information on the scope and cost of the project. Mr. Wendt provided clarification on the contract and Project Manager Trevor Lansdown detailed the purpose of the building. Mr.Wendt then listed the Court's options should they decide to not approve the item. Commissioner Brown requested a workshop to better explore the County's options. On motion by Commissioner Brown and second by Commissioner Konderla, the Court voted to table the item until further notice with four members in favor of tabling and Commissioner Watson against. Motion: Table, Moved by Commissioner Fred Brown, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed.4-1. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters. Nays: Watson. 10. Approval of No Award for RFP#CI P 25-562 Construction Manager at Risk for Ashford Hills Warehouse & Office Suites due to changing the project to a design-bid-build bidding process. Jody Quimby made a recommendation that the Court consider revising the wording on this agenda item. Purchasing Agent Charles Wendt clarified the intent of the language. In light of the previous discussion on item number 9,the Court voted to table this item until the scope of this project could be addressed.The motion to table passed with four in favor and Commissioner Watson opposed. Motion: Table, Moved by Commissioner Bentley Nettles, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 4-1. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters. Nays: Watson. 11. Approval of No Award for RFP#CI P 25-571 Compensation& Benefits Study due to lack of qualified proposal responses. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Bentley Nettles, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 12. Permission to Re-Advertise CI P 25-571 Compensation& Benefits Study. Commissioner Konderla asked if this study could be done in-house. Budget Officer Nina Payne explained that the County does not have the resources to perform a compensation and benefits study in-house and by bringing in a third party to perform the study, the Court will receive a more objective evaluation. Human Resources Director Jennifer Salazar agreed with Ms. Payne and stated that a third party will be able to better assist in creating a new job classification system. Commissioner Brown expressed his desire that this be done in-house and Commissioner Watson stated that her preference is to have a third party come in to perform the study. Assistant District Attorney Brian Baker stated his concerns regarding the County losing valuable employees to other agencies due to not being competitive. Mr. Baker added that by bringing in a third party expert, the County will receive a much more accurate picture of comparative pay and benefits across other Texas counties. On motion by Commissioner Watson and second by Commissioner Konderla, the Court voted to approve the re-advertisement of the Compensation and Benefits Study, with 3 members in favor and two opposed. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 3-2. Ayes: Brown, Peters, Watson. Nays: Konderla, Nettles. 13. Approval of CI P#25-599 Commissioning Services for Ashford Hills warehouse and office suites with Tom Green & Company Engineers, Inc.for$81,430.00. In light of the previous discussion on item number 9,the Court voted to table this item until the scope of this project could be addressed. The motion to table passed with four in favor and Commissioner Watson opposed. Motion: Table, Moved by Commissioner Bentley Nettles, Seconded by Commissioner Fred Brown. Passed.4-1. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters. Nays: Watson. 14. Consider and take action on the Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU)cost estimate of$6,224.66 to relocate existing pole and guy wire. This work is needed in order to accommodate the proposed widening of Koppe Bridge Road. Site is located in Precinct 1. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Fred Brown, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Abstain: Nettles. 15. Consider and take action on the Frontier Communications utility permit to install 3,800 feet of fiber optic conduits within the right-of-way of Shirley Road. Project also includes road bores of Shirley Road, Bourbon Lane and Whiskey River Road. Site is located in Precinct 2. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Chuck Konderla, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 16. Approval of the Treasurer's Report for February 2025. The Court voted unanimously to receive, approve and order filed as submitted the Treasurer's report for February 2025.A copy is attached and made a part of these minutes. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 17. Budget Amendments. • FY 24/25 Budget Amendments 29.01 -29.06 29.01 - Reallocate funds for Health and Life Insurance. 29.02 -Transfer of funds from Contingency to Jail Medical Services. 29.03 - Reallocate funds for Road and Bridge. 29.04 Transfer of funds from Road and;Bridge to Environmental Protection. 29.05 - Reallocate funds for 2020 Certificates of Obligation. 29.06 - Reallocate funds County Judge -Administration. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Bentley Nettles, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J.Watson. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 18. Personnel Change of Status. • Approval of Personnel Change of Status A copy of the Personnel Change of Status is attached. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 19. Payment of Claims. Approval of Payment of Claims: • a. 8209437 -8209543 • b. 9204246 -9204322 Karen Simpson asked for clarification on the payments to Hart concerning election equipment. Elections Administrator Trudy Hancock provided clarification stating that the bar code referred to by Ms. Simpson is only used to number ballots and the voting system used by Brazos County is certified by the State of Texas. Motion:Approve, Moved by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson, Seconded by Commissioner Fred Brown. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Brown, Konderla, Nettles, Peters, Watson. 20. Acknowledgement of the Brazos County Sheriff's Office SB22 Rural Law Enforcement Grant expenditures in the amount of$212,000 for the following, Commercial Motor Vehicle Enforcement Truck, Safety Grill Guards and Firearms. The Court acknowledged receipt of Brazos County Sheriff's Office SB22 Rural Law Enforcement Grant expenditures. 21. Acknowledgement of the Monthly Report from the County Auditor for February 2025. The Court acknowledged receipt of the County Auditor Report for February 2025. 22. Acknowledgement of the State Inspector's Reports for the November 2024 General Election. Cynde Wiley questioned whether the Court would take action to approve the State Inspector's Report due to an incorrect selection of the voting equipment used by the County on the report. Judge Peters stated that no action would be taken, as this item is an acknowledgement. Elections Administrator Trudy Hancock explained that the purpose of this report is just for the County's benefit and an incorrect selection of the voting equipment used is inconsequential. The Court acknowledged receipt of the State Inspector's Reports for the November 2024 General Election. 23. Acknowledgement of the FY 2024-2025 Budget to Actuals by Fund as of April 30, 2025. Acknowledgement of the FY 2024-2025 Contingency Budget to Actuals by Fund as of April 30, 2025. The Court acknowledged receipt of the 2024-2025 Budget to Actuals by Fund and Contingency Fund Budget to Actuals as of April 30, 2025. 24. Juvenile director's report on detention population. Juvenile Director Linda Ricketson reported there are 34 juveniles in the detention center, 19 are male, 15 are female, and 34 have electronic monitors. 25. Sheriff's report on inmate population. Chief Deputy Kevin Stuart reported for Sheriff Wayne Dicky, there were 743 inmates in jail, 638 inmates are male, 105 are female, and 49 have electronic monitors. 26. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics. Commissioner Konderla announced the May 6, 2025 Inner Loop East Study public meeting from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at Legends Event Center. Commissioner Nettles announced that he will not be in Court on May 13, 2025 due to the Chamber of Commerce trip to Washington D.C. Commissioner Brown commended Purchasing Agent Charles Wendt and his team for all their efforts put into the Vendor Fair on May 1, 2025. He stated there was a great turnout, and the Chamber is looking at doing it again next year. Commissioner Brown also announced the Precinct 3 Townhall meeting scheduled for June 10, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. at the Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3 Office. Judge Peters addressed comments concerning a lack of transparency about the East Loop Project. He walked through the sequence of events leading up to the November 2022 Bond Election including a public workshop on July 28, 2022 and two mailers sent to every registered voter in Brazos County. He stated that the results from the November 8, 2022 Election reflect overwhelming support of the Bond. Judge Peters added that it is the responsibility of the Court to respect the will of the people and he promised to do so with integrity and transparency. Announcements 27. Adjourn. Pg I_of BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S COURT DAY OF , 20 to `.-O3 0 PM, Nc ,r- Name Organization (PLEASE PRINT) (PLEASE PRINT) skA)M:\AW2 00 C 000/1 0_iadtf\- Aoki---9\c (lockpe. c_amni cc,r\-- cs\v,c,, a(\ao(b-ca c C4 v1 C,cu -,k- sir l o P 12-e-1-evs- wroa, Ob al-kirks Of \LA „I , itA't , 1 ,, „ ;di r‘JaN () , I t _i__.) 4--- S e�c r- a 5 f 5 c� 9e'+. e141e7e 14t rA 141)61A4 CV 7NY OR Coe 9i r A/k/ s"/21)1V_ot — ezA-4--b, -J--;,-z,,, ,i/Ez__ ProOtea i 1 TA-xlifiz-lt-- ,Its ar Al-‘a 4(JJ N) O k) . ,. , ,lie e / Cc -S7LiV Pg 0' of BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S COURT DAY OF J, AA 20, � 0 1 C6L-WiM, Name Organization (PLEASE PRINT) (PLEASE PRINT) CA /� �- /4 d ceds &/1//afg 1 '( j P Ci. ` 1, 13(4 c-e. (if& / c-fcrwisi s iDA ef(41 ,9 to, 4,(ic ,k(D 10,6(e-- „Kt?v(9 S- t' VS° -rvhDr be*, A 6'1fiz , ,,L Pg,of* BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S COURT DAY OF a , 20025 , o PM, 2e ,,I, / 1 i Name Organization (PLEASE PRINT) (PLEASE PRINT) Oce r-tf Ira 2e„2.40 IOW gl\n R6,--ccst, 'II T qk)ii A (0049kAlc tut,„44- 13),,,,ktci-i witmAA wt.", 1 Pth'o 11k1111 Tb6J-thratill Ln.\-L S/2/q P Po /(,c/ �J +L,-r• 1�, i/Tart (),J/7 \ \ Ai \ C�`-Cri 5 [{ e__-s kinciirlivil ut,44 Y D LJiMI5 Y ieli.0___911 1 .--ybe, ' "bC MS, OP(i) \ Xr- ' C Pg of T BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S COURT (4v DAY O Ma. , 20 35 I 01, 00 V/PM, 'Re j u (c( Name Organization (PLEASE PRINT) (PLEASE PRINT) rc, r ne-7 Ctito�1- Aroun &:cadi 600(L ese/W_ £!,itke l� Eck C3-4 ppy5f 't/y L ? ( JC �C - aaro- /40..v R(sc) A7A .zr\ g c_,k a-+s o 1 ) 1 e- osaAADot) ? � ke Fc Cvuu &c EcT e0s)_ )a) PuRdruw\i3 Pg of 1( BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S COURT Co'"/1/4 DAY OF V\ , 20 g-5 10 OD A /PM, RnU\cluir Name Organization (PLEASE PRINT) (PLEASE PRINT) Tzar 7), OP Joik5bit) 1417-)7if \r„,2), (v � . n C_ ?6.6 A1JDt-o / e�J (I oic 1, OffifPirr-0-401). • SOYD1461.. Pgle_of BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S COURT Li, DAY OF RN 20 \0 :,0° PM, Name Organization (PLEASE PRINT)Q (PLEASE PRINT) �GLry u P� (S-VM_S. 0 A• d-r r/ce_ r t/d2 Z. 1A00 ,,-1 U(.Pin J. 'R-cactAAA Mc_Conaciful `—;41v ewYvCAL- , Aic .i , woo/04, i-tyP 'Ell/1(k • le :119LU: TY- C- At, foarJe RYAN, ,(Onitr-eiro1/4f _taS /Pi: 644.c / OA. 7 ics 4bGAA,CVT) TS b i ) Asa S fir' Pg`k of'y BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S COURT 6 DAY OF P4 , 20 . 5� � Name Organization (PLEASE PRINT) (PLEASE PRINT) vz ji u S j3 e,S O ( A4'c\ \I,k .1 14 5ttf r IP:61Z—• r (eJk +A— - A;2 f cok S Q;)tT Ori-ka I. Kyle Greenwood 10000 Steep Hollow Road Bryan,Texas 77808 May 6, 2025 Judge Duane Peters County of Brazos 300 E 26th Street Bryan,Texas 77803 RE: Inner East Loop Proposed Alignment Comment Period Dear Judge Peters, Because of the county's reluctance to conduct this process in a fully transparent manner and because so many new families will be affected, my neighbors and I request the comment period be extended from 17 to 90 days to give us time to make sure that as many of our fellow citizens as possible can be made aware of the situation and not lose their right to express their opinions. Sincerely, Kyle Greenwood www.noeastloop,com :. .• �'{ BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Brazos County Office of the NUMBER: Sheriff-Detention Ctr. DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of Proclamation 25-022 proclaiming May 4-10, 2025 as National Correctional Officers and Employees Week. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Chief Kevin Stuart, CJM DATE: 04/09/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 REQUIREMENTS: Approval and signature NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: This Proclamation for National Correctional Officers and Employees week is to raise awareness of Correctional Officers and employee in the Brazos County. ACTION REQUESTED OR Approval and Signature ALTERNATIVES: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type 2025 National Correctional Officers and Employees Week Proclamation.pdf 2025 National Correctional Officers and Cover Memo Employees Week Proclamation Ronald Reagan proclamation letter.docx Ronald Regan Proclamation Cover Memo oG Loy �p'Y O E•9� PROCLAMATION National Correctional Officers and Employees Week WHEREAS,National Correctional Officers and Employees Week was first proclaimed on May 5, 1984,by President Ronald Reagan when he signed Proclamation 5187 creating"National Correctional Officers Week,"to recognize the men and women who work in jails,prisons,and community corrections across the country; and WHEREAS, National Correctional Officers and Employees Week became the official name the first week in May when,in 1986,the U.S. Senate officially changed the name from "National Correctional Officers Week"; and WHEREAS,National Correctional Officers and Employees Week has been designated as the week of May 4 through May 10,2025,by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Prisons; and WHEREAS,National Correctional Officers and Employee Week honors the work of Correctional Officers and Correctional Personnel for their service with honor,respect,and integrity; and raises the awareness of the duties, hazards,and sacrifices made by the Correctional employees; and WHEREAS,National Correctional Officers and Employees week in Brazos County recognizes Correctional officers and employees for their role in safeguarding the citizens of Brazos County by providing safe,secure,and humane incarceration of offenders within their custody. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County,does hereby proclaim the week of May 04,2025,through May 10,2025,as"National Correctional Officers and Employees Week." All citizens are encouraged to pay tribute to all the many Correctional Employees working in Brazos County for the vital public service they provide. PROCLAIMED this day of M Pr'{ 2025. Duane Peters, County Judge ,/ Commissioner'Be ffle'v Nettles,fPrecinct 1 mmissio Chuc nderla, Preci a,teytt./3 Commissioner Fred Brown, Precinct 3 Commissione ands J. Watson,Precinct 4 Y = RONALD l GAN XL President of t ie United States: 1981-1989 Proclamation 5187—National Correctional Officers Week, 1984 May 5,1984 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation Correctional officers have the difficult and often dangerous assignment of ensuring the custody, safety and well-being of the over 600,000 inmates in our Nation's prisons and jails. Their position is essential to the day-to-day operations of these institutions;without them it would be impossible to achieve the foremost institutional goals of security and control. Historically, correctional officers have been viewed as "guards," occupying isolated and misunderstood positions in prisons and jails. In recent years,the duties of these officers have become increasingly complex and demanding. They are called upon to fill, simultaneously, custodial, supervisory and counseling roles. The professionalism, dedication and courage exhibited by these officers throughout the performance of these demanding and often conflicting roles deserve our utmost respect. The important work of correctional Officers often does not receive the recognition from the public it deserves. It is appropriate that we honor the many contributions and accomplishments of these men and women who are a vital component of the field of corrections. In recognition of the contributions of correctional officers to our Nation,the Congress,by Senate Joint Resolution 132,has designated the week beginning May 6, 1984, as "National Correctional Officers Week," and authorized and requested the President to issue an appropriate proclamation. Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim the week beginning May 6, 1984, as National Correctional Officers Week. I call upon officials of State and local governments and the people of the United States to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies and activities. In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand this fifth day of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and eighth. bw RONALD REAGAN W; aax+r .t.i 7 . BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Brazos County Office of the NUMBER: Sheriff-Detention Ctr. DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of Proclamation 25-023 proclaiming May 6-12, 2025 as National Nurses Recognition Week. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Chief Kevin Stuart, CJM DATE: 04/09/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 REQUIREMENTS: Approval and signature of the Proclamation NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: This Proclamation for National Nurses week is to raise awareness for the Nurses in the Brazos County. ACTION REQUESTED OR approval and signature ALTERNATIVES: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type 2025 National Nurses Recognition Proclamation.pdf 2025 National Nurses Recognition Proclamation Cover Memo 2025 Ronald Reagan proclamation letter.docx Ronald Regan Proclamation Cover Memo 'S��S�E OrTP" Z' 9. - • PROCLAMATION National Nurses Week May 6 — 12, 2025 WHEREAS National Nurses Day is a day we celebrate nurses and raise awareness of the importance in their contributions to society. This day,May 6th is part of National Nurses Week—a week that ends on May 12th and marks the birthday of Florence Nightingale; and WHEREAS President Ronald Reagan signed Proclamation 4913 on March 25, 1982 proclaiming"National Recognition Day for Nurses" to be May 6; and WHEREAS Nursing has a variety of different level of skills as well as areas in which they contribute with each playing an important role which facilities to maintain doctor-patient care; and WHEREAS Nurses are one of the most integral parts of a medical team, fulfilling a crucial role in providing patients and their families the highest level of care, as well as a key means of emotional support, significantly contributing to improved patient and family outcomes; and WHEREAS Brazos County wants to recognize all Nurses in the Community as well as in Corrections for their acts of heroism, compassion, dedication to duty and commitment to our community. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Brazos County Commissioners Court does hereby proclaim May 6,2025,through May 12, 2025,as National Nursing Recognition Week in Brazos County to increase the public's awareness of the importance the role Nurses play to improve and promote health and wellness to their patients. PROCLAIMED this day of ryl 44y 2025. CemltDuane Peters )341.4 County Judge Commissions Bentl y ettle Commissioner uck Konder Pr inct 1 Precinct 2 (7.441..0-1_,4„) Commissioner Fred Brown Commissioner nda J. atson Precinct 3 Precii c 4 4 rr '; R ONALD REAGAN XL President of the United States: 1981-1989 Proclamation 4913—National Recognition Day for Nurses, 1982 March 24, 1982 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation Scientific advancements in recent years have dramatically expanded the role of nurses in our health care system, and their knowledge and skills have increased to keep pace with new technologies and methods of treatments. Yet,the very core of nursing—caring for patients at the bedside—remains unchanged. Nurses bring a special compassion and concern for the patient and for the patient's family. Nurses play a vital role in educating people in how to avoid illness and promote good health. Nurses are essential to every health care setting—in hospitals, nursing homes, ambulatory care centers,and patients' homes. Cardiac, post-surgical,trauma,and burn units require intensive nursing care around the clock. Community health nurses enable the elderly to receive needed care in their own homes. Nurses trained in maternal and child health provide much of the care in urban and rural clinics. Nurses with specialized training treat cancer patients,stroke victims, and psychiatric patients. Nurse researchers are developing new and better ways to improve nursing practice, reduce patient stress, and help patients and their families cope with illness. The nurses of this country deserve our gratitude for their personal and professional contributions to the improved health of American citizens. The Congress has, by House Joint Resolution 263, Public Law 97-57, demonstrated its commitment by requesting me to designate May 6, 1982,as National Recognition Day for Nurses. Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, President of the United States of America,do hereby proclaim May 6, 1982, as National Recognition Day for Nurses. In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of March, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and sixth. (Z1Z,V6-X1-- 1247544°— RONALD REAGAN G BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Human Resources NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval requested from Human Resources for acceptance of two (2) $100 Walmart gift cards from Wilton's Office Works to be used for purchases for the Health &Safety Expo on June 5, 2025 benefiting employees of Brazos County, City of College Station, and City of Bryan. TO: Commissioners Court DATE: 05/01/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 The Human Resources Department is requesting approval to accept a donation that will be used for purchases related to the upcoming Health and Safety Expo.This donation is not NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: included in the current year's budget, as it does not impact county funds.Approval of this agenda item will allow the department to enhance the quality and scope of the expo without additional cost to the County. Failure to approve this item may limit the department's ability to organize this event. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Acceptance of Donation Form - Wilton s 5.1.2025.pdf Acceptance of Donation Form Backup Material Donation Letter - Wilton s 5.1.2025.pdf Donation Letter Backup Material BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS 1�' ACCEPTANCE OF DONATED/AWARDED PROPERTY *�ts'~ ,IN ,;,°* DONATION OF COUNTY PROPERTY Date: 05/0IP025 Acceptance of Donated/Awarded Property Donation of County Property (Awarded property requires signed court documentation) Acceptance of Donated Inmate Property (Requires signed inmate documentation-NO VALUE ASSESSED) Item Description:Two(2) Walmart Gift Cards -$100 each(totaling$200) Please provide all information requested below as applicable to the property being accepted or donated. Forms containing any blank fields will be returned for completion. Make: NA Model: NA Year: NA SN/VIN#:NA Functional III Non-Functional. Explain if Non-Functional NA Additional Description/Information: Donation of two(2) Walmart Gift cards ($100 each) for the Health& Safety Expo. Estimated Value: $ 200,00 Check box if the donated property is in possession of the County department. Acceptance of Donated Property Donation of County Property Check the appropriate account based on Check the appropriate entity property being estimated value of property being accepted: donated to: ❑61235000(Donation-Other)* Government Entity: Li 60010000(Minor Property-SI -$4999) Organization Name Other(Due to Statuatory ❑80010000(Capital Property-Over S5000) requirements prior approval is required by Purchasing: Organization Name For Budget use only *Donations-Other account 61235000 is to be used ONLY for cash/check funds donated to Brazos County. I certify that the above-mentioned item has been donated or awarded to Brazos County. This item has been received in good faith and upon approval by Commissioner's Court will become a part of the General Fixed Asset Account of Brazos County. The determination to accept or reject the donation will be made at the sole discretion of Commissioners Court based upon such things as usefulness, projected operating, maintenance,and insurance costs. i Requesting Department: 15000100 Human Resources Division Department Name Authorize Signature Organization Receiving Donated Property: Authorized Signature Approved by Commissioners Court on this lan day of ' O . For Treasurer's Use Only Division: 15000100 .... /C:= '• Account: 46023000 Commissioners Court Approval WILTON'S OFFICE WORKS 181 N. Earl Rudder Freeway Bryan,Texas 77802 April 15,2025 Brazos County Risk Management 200 S.Texas Avenue,Suite 264 Bryan,Texas 77803 This letter is to confirm the donation of two(2)Walmart gift cards in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00)each,totaling Two Hundred dollars($200.00),to Brazos County for the Brazos County Health and Safety Expo which will be held the first week of June 2025. Thank you, / ) / it L�1 fl 1111 Scott Bishop Wilton's Office Works 1 E o .off 4114 1)*i civ BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Human Resources NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval requested from Human Resources for acceptance of a monetary donation in the amount of$300.00 from Insurors of Texas to be used for purchases for the Health & Safety Expo on June 5, 2025 benefiting employees of Brazos County, City of College Station, and City of Bryan. TO: Commissioners Court DATE: 05/01/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 The Human Resources Department is requesting approval to accept a donation that will be used for purchases related to the upcoming Health and Safety Expo. This donation is not NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: included in the current year's budget, as it does not impact county funds.Approval of this agenda item will allow the department to enhance the quality and scope of the expo without additional cost to the County. Failure to approve this item may limit the department's ability to organize this event. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Acceptance of Donation Form Insurors of TX final.pdf Acceptance of Donated Form-Insurors of TX Cover Memo ..1•,`ma`s , BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS • 4:"f=4,-`•F1, ACCEPTANCE OF DONATED/AWARDED PROPERTY 't , N. , `-''` DONATION OF COUNTY PROPERTY Date: 05/0 I P0?5 Acceptance of Donated/Awarded Property nDonation of County Property (Awarded property requires signed court documentation) Jcceptance of Donated Inmate Property (Requires signed inmate documentation—NO VALUE ASSESSED) Item Description: Monetary donation from Insurors of Texas in the amount of$300.00. Please provide all information requested below as applicable to the property being accepted or donated. Forms containing any blank fields will be returned for completion. Make: NA Model: NA Year: NA SN/VIN#:NA Functional L__.d Non-Functional. Explain if Non-Functional NA Additional Description/Information: Monetary donation from Insurors of Texas in the amount of$300.00 for the Health & Safety Expo Estimated Value: $ 3Q0,00 Check box if the donated property is in possession of the County department. Acceptance of Donated Property Donation of County Property Check the appropriate account based on Check the appropriate entity property being estimated value of property being accepted: donated to: �61235000(Donation-Other)* Government Entity: ❑60010000(Minor Property Si -$4999) Organization Name p' Y- Other(Due to Statuatory ❑80010000(Capital Property-Over S5000) requirements prior approval is required by Purchasing: Organization Name For Budget use only *Donation—Other account 61235000 is to be used ONLY for cash/check funds donated to Brazos County. I certify that the above-mentioned item has been donated or awarded to Brazos County. This item has been received in good faith and upon approval by Commissioner's Court will become a part of the General Fixed Asset Account of Brazos County. The determination to accept or reject the donation will be made at the sole discretion of Commissioners Court based upon such things as usefulness, projected operating, maintenance,and insurance costs. ,,pper� ����, /� Requesting Department: 15000 100 t lA w e�.i I2-"'a" c3 i3O-- r `'f Division Department Name , Author zed Signature Organization Receiving Donated Property: Authorized Signature C.- SNc"\....j Approved by Commissioners Court on this 6. day of ga For Treasurer's Use Only Division: 15000100 Account: 46023000 Commiss oners Court Approval :.a TyAtjF�y�,. BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Purchasing NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of Agreement#25-111 with The LaSalle Hotel for Brazos County. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Presley Nelson DATE: 04/29/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 The preferred rate agreement with The LaSalle Hotel will be primarily used for sequestered jurors, benefitting the District Attorney and various courts.This will be in addition to our NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: existing agreement with Best Western to allow for more availability.All hotel expenses are fully budgeted by the departments. Brazos County is getting the"Prevailing Government Per Diem"that is stipulated by the federal GSA, currently$110 per night. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Rate Agreement.pdf Rate Agreement Backup Material THE LASALLEHOTEL PREFERRED RATE AGREEMENT PREPARED FOR: Brazos County Purchasing Department CONTACT: Presley Nelson ADDRESS: 200 S.Texas Ave, Ste 240 Bryan,TX 77803 EMAIL: pnelson@brazoscountytx.gov TERMS: April 17, 2025—December 31, 2025 RATE: The LaSalle Hotel ("Hotel")is pleased to extend the following, non- commissionable guestroom rate options to Company("Company"): Prevailing Government Per Diem These rates are subject to availability. Should the preferred rate not be available for your requested dates of stay, the best available house rate will prevail. Guest room rates are offered on a net, non-commissionable basis and are subject to our occupancy tax of 15.75%. For comparison, our rack rate range is$189-$449 per night. Preferred rates are applicable to single or double occupancy and will be confirmed based on the specific room inventory available at the time a reservation is made. The Hotel commits to honor this rate and your Company agrees to communicate with its frequent travelers, naming the Hotel as a preferred hotel vendor in the area. In addition, it is agreed that the Hotel will be prominently positioned in any printed or electronic rate directories published by your Company. PRODUCTION: This rate is based on an estimated 50 rooms nights per year. This agreement shall be subject to quarterly reviews, at which time production will be evaluated. CANCELLATION: Group is allowed to cancel reservation day of arrival without penalty if Hotel is less than 95% occupancy. RESERVATIONS: Individual reservations can be made by contacting the sales department at 979.822.2000 or through online booking at Marriott.com/CLLHB. TRACKING: Tracking will be coordinated by the Hotel. Callers must request the preferred company rate at time of booking. 1 MEETINGS: Due to the difference in nature of individual and group bookings,we are unable to guarantee that the preferred rate will be offered for groups. Group rates will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis according to market conditions and the meeting's specifications. The proposed rates are for individual travelers and may or may not be available for group or convention attendees. We will work with group meetings on an individual basis to establish the best rate possible for the group. REQUEST FOR SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: Requests for specific rooms, suites or bed types will be accommodated whenever possible. We consider it part of our standard of service to arrange for any necessities your valued associates may require while staying with us. GUARANTEE: Reservations can be guaranteed for late arrival with a credit card or deposit. In the event that a reservation is guaranteed for late arrival and the guest"no-shows", the appropriate room and tax charges will be charged against the form of payment used to guarantee the room for late arrival. Reservations can be cancelled without penalty 48 hours prior to arrival. A cancellation number should be obtained from the reservations agent for reference. BILLING PROCEDURES: All guestroom charges including room, tax and/or incidentals will be the responsibility of the individual traveler. If a traveler does not have a credit card, a cash deposit will be required upon check in at the front desk. If charges are to be direct billed to the Company prior credit arrangements and notification to our reservations office is required. In addition to a completed credit application,we require a letter on company letterhead authorizing billing. This information must be updated annually. All direct billing authorized by your company is guaranteed for payment and payment is due upon receipt of invoice, but no later than ten days after the Hotel's billing date. The Hotel reserves the right to institute an early departure charge at any time based upon our local needs. Traveler has up until and including check-in to change departure without a penalty. Check in time is 4:00 pm, however in our continuing effort to provide a pleasant stay, guests will be able to check in as early as rooms are available. TRAVELER BENEFITS: As a Preferred Account your travelers will receive the following amenities and services: Travel Program: Any business traveler can become a member of our Marriott Bonvoy program at no cost and with no required minimum stay. Marriott Bonvoy is our frequent guest program designed to provide awards and benefits to the individuals that frequent our family of hotels. Some of the benefits that member's may receive are: Airline Miles, 7 Points to be used towards Free Nights, Vacation Packages, Express Check in and out, and a complimentary Newspaper and In-Room Amenities. Membership applications may be obtained at our Front Desk upon check in. TERMS OF USE: Terms of this agreement are subject to a quarterly review at which time room night production will be measured and evaluated.The Hotel reserves the right to cancel or alter terms of this arrangement with thirty days written notice if volume is not on pace to meet the annual room night commitment. Likewise, Company may request renegotiation if room night production exceeds original expectation. Please sign and return a copy of this agreement by Thursday,April 17,2025 so we may load your special rates. ACCEPTED BY: Dl.AA 114 PG t e-71 5 10 (Q 5 Print Authorized Name Date: Signature Authorized Name HOTEL CONTACT: Wilma De La Cruz Date: Task Force Director of Sales The LaSalle Hotel, a Tribute Portfolio Hotel 120 S. Main St Bryan,TX 77803 Phone:979.822.2000 Email: wdelacruz@newcastlehotels.com 3 1 03. OG j Pao BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Purchasing NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of#25-123 BuildingReports.com Membership Agreement. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Presley Nelson DATE: 04/29/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: True BUDGETED: True DOLLAR AMOUNT: $2,085.80 BuildingReports.com is used to organize and schedule annual inspections of fire safety and NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: security systems in all county buildings.The program is primarily used by Facility Services but benefits all county departments.This membership is fully budgeted by Facility Services. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Membership Agreement.pdf Membership Agreement Backup Material (FlikBuildingReports.com Membership Agreement 1325 Satellite Blvd. r Bldg. 1600, Suite 1607 Suwanee, GA 30024 Date 4/24/2025 BUILDING REPORTS Proposal# 14498 Account# 4771 Terms Net 30 Applicant&Company Details Ship To Brazos County Facilities Services 200 S Texas Ave Ste 352 PO Box 914 Bryan.TX 77803-3999 Bryan.TX 77806-0914 US US Item Program Descriptions Qty Total Facility Facility Membership(Annual 5/1/2025-4/30/2026) 5,000 1,250.00T PDA-MO Monthly Inspector User ID-$19.95 per User-2 users 24 478.80T Facility Scans 5,000 Included Scans for duration of term. 0 0.00T Included Scans Used To-Date»» Monthly Scan Monthly Scan Usage>>» 0 0.00T ECSFAC Embedded Codes and Standards for Facilities 12 240.00T DD250MB DocDrive for Online Storage of Documents(Monthly up to 12 117.00T 250MB) FireScan Licensing Member is licensed to use FireScan 1 0.00T HVAC Licensing Member is licensed to use HVAC 1 0.00T SafetyScan Licensing Member is licensed to use SafetyScan 1 0.00T SecurityScan Licen... Member is licensed to use SecurityScan 1 0.00T SuppressionScan Li... Member is licensed to use SuppressionScan . 1 0.00T SprinklerScan Licen... Member is licensed to use SprinklerScan 1 0.00T Sales Tax 0.00 0.00 Total USD 2,085.80 THIS SERVICE AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this date as indicated by the signature below(the"Effective Date"), by and between BuildingReports.com,Inc.,a Georgia corporation("BuildingReports"),and Customer,whose principal place of business is set forth above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties ha caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the date set forth below.Membership will becom ach pon signing and dating this Membership Agreement,and forwarding a copy to BuildingReports.com via any one of the thods indicated in -foote f is form. Signature Date I i`' /„.1 5 fi Name D API E Pt;Tee--S Title 1.O -i Tv,0c'€ Pay By n Credit Card ri Invoice PO No. If choosing Credit Card option,include completed 20-day Payment Term If using a Purchase Order,please include a copy with Credit Card Authorization Form the Membership Agreement. Notice regarding Sales&Use Tax: Purchaser is responsible for all applicable sales&use tax. If the quote and/or invoice does not reflect that BuildingReports is collecting such tax,Purchaser agrees to self-assess and remit any tax due on its purchases,according to the Terms&Conditions agreement All tax exemption documents issued by Purchaser must be issued to"BuildingReports.com,Inc."according to state guidelines and specify which products/services are being claimed as exempt by Purchaser. Send completed form to BuildingReports.com via one of the following methods: Email-return to your BuildingReports Account Executive or sales@buildingreports.com Fax-(770)495-9331 Mail- BuildingReports, 1325 Satellite Boulevard, Suite 1607,Suwanee, GA 30024 Sty- o�•'�R� ,}�N . « ti AI 4 G E BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Purchasing NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Award of RFQ#CIP 25-529 Architect for Ashford Hills Warehouse &Office Suites. Recommended Award: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Kaitlyn Battles DATE: 04/29/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: True BUDGETED: True DOLLAR AMOUNT: $715,000.00 BUDGET DETAIL: Fund 45000 -General Capital Improvement Fund The evaluation committee evaluated, interviewed, and re-evaluated multiple architect firms and found that The Arkitex Studio, Inc. is the most qualified design firm for the Ashford Hills NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: Warehouse and Office Suites. This project is to house a Purchasing Warehouse with covered parking for new vehicles and surplus, Records Management, District Clerk Storage, and Election Storage. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type, Partly Executed Contract - Arkitex Studio.pdf Contract Backup Material Exhibit A - Arkitex Studio Proposal.pdf Proposal Backup Material RFQ - Arkitex Studio.pdf RFQ Backup Material Tabulation - CIP 25-529.pdf Tabulation Backup Material AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY AND THE ARKITEX STUDIO,INC. (ARCHITECT) THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. THIS AGREEMENT is made on the day of , 2025, Between the COUNTY: BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS do Brazos County Commissioners' Court Attention: County Judge 200 South Texas Ave., Ste. 332 Bryan, Texas 77803 and the ARCHITECT: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. 308 N. Bryan Avenue Bryan, TX 77803 for the following SCOPE OF WORK: This Requests for Qualifications (RFQs) is for an architect to design facilities and this project as a whole to include,but not limited to the following: • Approximately 10,000 square feet of unconditioned warehouse storage. • Approximately 10,000 square feet of conditioned warehouse storage. • Individual, secure office spaces for four (4) independent depaitiuents, including storefront,public counter, and office space. • Shared back-of-house amenities, including restrooms, breakroom, IT/Mechanical and copy.room. • Loading dock for multiple 18-wheelers and ramp for ground level deliveries. • Covered parking for new vehicles, surplus vehicles, surplus heavy equipment, container units,trailers, etc. • Site security fencing and screening. • Required landscaping. • Site development build-out including sanitary sewer, stormwater capture and detention, electrical, telecom, fire loop, site lighting, employee parking,public parking, etc. Commissioning services will be performed by the county's contracted vendor, Tom Green & Company Engineers throughout the project. The County will also provide the project management software, Procore, for all design and construction team members to use as a requirement. The COUNTY and ARCHITECT agree as set forth below. Agreement Between County and Architect Page 1 of 10 ARTICLE I ARCHITECT RESPONSIBILITY 1.1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICE 1.1.1 The ARCHITECT'S services consist of those services performed by the ARCHITECT, ARCHITECT'S employees and the ARCHITECT'S consultants as enumerated in Articles 2 and 3 of this Agreement. 1.1.2 The ARCHITECT'S services shall be performed as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work. The ARCHITECT shall submit for the COUNTY'S approval a schedule for the performance of the ARCHITECT'S services which may be adjusted as the Project proceeds and shall include allowances for periods of time required for the COUNTY'S review and for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. Time limits established by this schedule approved by the COUNTY shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the ARCHITECT or the COUNTY. ARTICLE II SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES 2.1 DEFINITION 2.1.1 The ARCHITECT'S Basic Services consist of those described in attached Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference hereto— SCOPE OF BASIC SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED TO BRAZOS COUNTY. ARTICLE III ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.1 GENERAL 3.1.1 The services described in attached Exhibit"A" as Additional Services are not included in the Basic Services. It is expressly understood and agreed that ARCHITECT shall not furnish any of the additional services without the prior written authorization of the COUNTY or the COUNTY'S designee. The COUNTY shall have no obligation to pay for such additional services, which have been performed without the prior written authorization of the COUNTY as herein above provided. 3.1.2 Services which could possibly be required, but at the time of this Agreement were yet to be determined and which are not included in the Basic Services or Additional Services as identified and described in EXHIBIT "A", shall be considered Contingent Additional Services. A list of possible Contingent Additional Services that could be needed as the Project proceeds is included at the end of Exhibit"A." 3.1.3 It is expressly understood and agreed that the ARCHITECT shall not furnish any of the Contingent Additional Services without the prior written authorization of the COUNTY or the COUNTY'S designee. The COUNTY shall have no obligation to pay for such Contingent Additional Services, which have been performed without the prior written authorization of the COUNTY as herein above provided. Agreement Between County and Architect Page 2 of 10 ARTICLE IV COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY 4.1 The COUNTY shall provide full information regarding requirements for the Project, including a program, which shall set forth the COUNTY's objective, schedules, constraints and criteria. 4.2 The COUNTY shall establish and update an overall budget for the Project, including the Construction Cost, the COUNTY'S other costs and reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. 4.3 The COUNTY shall designate a representative authorized to act on the COUNTY'S behalf with respect to the Project. The COUNTY, or such authorized representative, shall render decisions in a timely manner pertaining to documents submitted by the ARCHITECT in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the ARCHITECT'S service. 4.4 The COUNTY shall give prompt written notice to the ARCHITECT if the COUNTY becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project or non-conformance with the contract documents. Any delay by the COUNTY in providing said notice shall not constitute a waiver, a bar or act to estop the COUNTY from exercising any of its rights under this contract. 4.5 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents presented by the ARCHITECT, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as the COUNTY deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of the ARCHITECT. 4.6 The proposed language of certificates or certifications requested of the ARCHITECT or the ARCHITECT'S consultants shall be submitted to the ARCHITECT for review and approval at least 14 days prior to execution. The COUNTY shall not request certifications that would require knowledge or services beyond the scope of this Agreement. 4.7 The COUNTY shall also provide those specific items identified in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by reference hereto —ITEMS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY TO THE ARCHITECT. ARTICLE V PROJECT COST 5.1 DEFINITION 5.1.1 The Project Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the COUNTY of all elements of the Project designed or specified by the ARCHITECT. 5.1.2 The Project Cost shall include the cost at current market rates of labor and materials furnished by the COUNTY and equipment designed, specified, selected or specially provided by the ARCHITECT, plus a reasonable allowance for the Contractor's overhead and profit. In addition, a reasonable allowance for contingencies shall be included for market conditions at the time of bidding and for changes in the work during construction. Agreement Between County and Architect Page 3 of 10 5.1.3 Project Cost does not include the compensation of the ARCHITECT and the ARCHITECT'S consultants, financing or other costs which are the responsibility of the COUNTY. 5.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROJECT COSTS 5.2.1 Evaluations of the COUNTY'S Project budget,preliminary estimates of Project Cost and detailed estimates of Project Cost, if any, prepared by the ARCHITECT, represent the ARCHITECT'S best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that neither the ARCHITECT nor the COUNTY has control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor's methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the ARCHITECT cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the COUNTY'S Project budget or from any estimate of Construction Cost or evaluation prepared or agreed to by the ARCHITECT. ARTICLE VI USE OF ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS 6.1 The COUNTY shall be the absolute and unqualified owner of all drawings, preliminary layouts, record drawings, sketches and other documents prepared pursuant to this Agreement by the ARCHITECT with the same force and effect as if the COUNTY prepared same. Copies of complete or partially completed mylar reproducible, preliminary layouts, record drawings, sketches and other documents prepared pursuant to this Agreement shall be delivered to the COUNTY when and if this Agreement is terminated or upon completion of this Agreement, whichever occurs first. The ARCHITECT may retain one set of reproducible copies of the documents and these copies shall be for the ARCHITECT'S sole use in preparation of studies or reports for the COUNTY. The ARCHITECT is expressly prohibited from selling, licensing, or otherwise marketing or donating these documents, or using the documents in preparation of other work for any other client,without the prior express written permission of the COUNTY. 6.2 All documents including reports, drawings and specifications prepared by the ARCHITECT pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the COUNTY or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by the ARCHITECT for the specific purposes intended will be at the COUNTY'S sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to the ARCHITECT. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle the ARCHITECT to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by the COUNTY and the ARCHITECT. 6.3 Submission or distribution of documents to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the ARCHITECT'S reserved rights. • ARTICLE VII TERMINATION, SUSPENSION OR ABANDONMENT 7.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon not less than fourteen (14) days written notice should the other party fail to substantially perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. Agreement Between County and Architect Page 4 of 10 7.2 If the COUNTY suspends the Project for more than thirty (30) consecutive days, the ARCHITECT shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension. 7.3 This Agreement may be terminated by the COUNTY upon not less than fourteen (14) days written notice to the ARCHITECT in the event that the Project is permanently abandoned. If the COUNTY abandons the Project for more than ninety (90) consecutive days, the ARCHITECT may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice. 7.4 If the COUNTY fails to give prompt written authorization to proceed with any phase of services after completion of the immediately preceding phase, the ARCHITECT may, after giving seven(7) days written notice to the COUNTY, suspend services under this Agreement. 7.5 Failure of the COUNTY to make payments to the ARCHITECT in accordance with this Agreement shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination. 7.6 If the COUNTY fails to make payment when due to the ARCHITECT for services and expenses, the ARCHITECT may, upon seven (7) days written notice to the COUNTY, suspend performance of services under this Agreement. Unless the ARCHITECT receives payment in full within seven (7) days of the date of the notice, the suspension shall take effect without further notice. In the event of a suspension of services, the ARCHITECT shall have no liability to the COUNTY for delay or damage caused by the COUNTY because of suspension of services. 7.7 In the event of termination that is not the fault of the ARCHITECT, the ARCHITECT shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination, together with Reimbursable Expenses, if any, then due. ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 8.1 Unless otherwise provided, this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the COUNTY. Venue for any dispute or disagreement regarding the terms of this Agreement shall be in Brazos County,Texas. 8.2 Causes of action between the parties to this Agreement pertaining to acts or failures to act shall be deemed to have accrued and the applicable statutes of limitation shall commence to run not later than either the date of Substantial Completion, or the date of issuance of the final Certificate for Payment for acts or failures to act occurring after Substantial Completion. 8.3 The COUNTY and the ARCHITECT, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors,.assigns and legal representative of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the COUNTY nor the ARCHITECT shall assign this Agreement without the express written consent of the other party. 8.4 This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between the COUNTY and the ARCHITECT and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the COUNTY and the ARCHITECT. Agreement Between County and Architect Page 5 of 10 8.5 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the COUNTY or the ARCHITECT. 8.6 Unless otherwise provided for in this Agreement, the ARCHITECT and the ARCHITECT'S consultants have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to, hazardous materials in any form at the Project site, including but not limited to asbestos, asbestos products, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) or other toxic substances. 8.7 The ARCHITECT shall have the right to include representations of the design of the Project, including photographs, among the ARCHITECT'S promotional professional materials. The ARCHITECT'S materials shall not include the COUNTY'S confidential or proprietary information, if the COUNTY has previously advised the ARCHITECT in writing of the specific information considered by the COUNTY to be confidential or proprietary. 8.8 COMPLIANCE AND STANDARDS. The ARCHITECT agrees to perform the work hereunder in accordance with generally accepted standards applicable thereto, and shall use that degree of care and skill commensurate with the architectural profession to comply with all applicable state, federal and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the work to. be performed hereunder and the ARCHITECT'S performance. 8.9 INDEMNIFICATION: ARCHITECT shall save and hold harmless the COUNTY from and against any and all claims and liability due to activities of the ARCHITECT, its agents or employees, performed under this Agreement and which result from any negligent act, error, or omission of the ARCHITECT, or of .any person employed by the ARCHITECT. The ARCHITECT shall also save harmless the COUNTY from and against any and all expenses, including attomey's fees which might be incurred by the COUNTY in litigation, or otherwise, resisting said claims or liabilities which might be imposed on the COUNTY as the result of such activities by the ARCHITECT,its agents or employees. 8.10 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: It is acknowledged that the ARCHITECT's failure to achieve substantial completion of the Work within the Contract Time provided by the Contract Documents will cause the COUNTY to incur substantial economic damages and losses of types and in amounts which are impossible to compute and ascertain with certainty as a basis for recovery by the COUNTY of actual damages, and that liquidated damages represent a fair, reasonable and appropriate estimate thereof. Accordingly, in lieu of actual damages for such delay, the ARCHITECT agrees that liquidated damages may be assessed and recovered by the COUNTY as against ARCHITECT and its Surety, in the event of delayed completion and without the COUNTY being required to present any evidence of the amount or character of actual damages sustained by reason thereof; therefore ARCHITECT shall be liable to the COUNTY for payment of liquidated damages in the amount of $1,000.00 for each day that Substantial Completion is delayed beyond the Contract Time as adjusted for time extensions provided by the Contract Documents. Such liquidated damages are intended to represent estimated actual damages and are not intended as a penalty, and ARCHITECT shall pay them to COUNTY without limiting COUNTY's right to terminate this agreement for default as provided elsewhere herein. Agreement Between County and Architect Page 6 of 10 ARTICLE IX PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT 9.1 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF BASIC SERVICES 9.1.1 Upon approval by the COUNTY, or the COUNTY'S designee, payment for Basic Services shall be made monthly and shall be in proportion to services performed that month within each phase of service. 9.2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES 9.2.1 Upon approval by the COUNTY or the COUNTY'S designee of the ARCHITECT'S statement of services rendered or expenses incurred, payment on account of the ARCHITECT'S Additional Services and for Reimbursable Expenses shall be made monthly. 9.3 PAYMENTS WITHHELD 9.3.1 No deductions shall be made from the ARCHITECT'S compensation on account of penalty, liquidated damages or other sums withheld from payments to Contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the Work other than those for which the ARCHITECT has been found to be liable. 9.4 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 9.4.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses pertaining to Additional Services and services performed on an hourly basis shall be available to the COUNTY or the COUNTY'S authorized representative at mutually convenient times. 9.5 LIMIT OF APROPRIATION 9.5.1 Prior to the execution of this Agreement, the ARCHITECT has been advised by the COUNTY and the ARCHITECT fully understand and agrees, such understanding and agreement being of the absolute essence to this Agreement, that the total maximum compensation that ARCHITECT may become entitled to hereunder, and the total maximum sum that the COUNTY shall become liable to pay to the ARCHITECT hereunder, shall not, under any conditions, circumstances or interpretations hereof, exceed the sum certified as available by the County Auditor in the Auditor's Certificate attached hereto. ARTICLE X BASIS OF COMPENSATION The COUNTY shall compensate the ARCHITECT from funds obtained through current revenue of Brazos County as follows: 10.1 BASIC COMPENSATION 10.1.1 For Basic Services, as described in Article 2, Basic Compensation shall be computed as follows: Agreement Between County and Architect Page 7 of 10 In accordance with the attached Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference hereto, SCHEDULE OF FEES. 10.2 COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES 10.2.1 For Additional Services of the ARCHITECT, as described in Article 3, compensation shall be computed as follows: In accordance with the attached Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference hereto, SCHEDULE OF FEES. 10.3 COMPENSATION FOR CONTINGENT ADDITIONAL SERVICES 10.3.1 For Contingent Additional Services of the ARCHITECT, as described in Article 3, compensation shall be computed as follows: In accordance with the attached Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference hereto, SCHEDULE OF FEES. 10.3.2 Payments shall be made by the COUNTY in accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 2251. The COUNTY shall pay the ARCHITECT'S invoice as approved by the COUNTY's designee within thirty (30) days after the COUNTY'S designee's approval of the same, provided that the approval or payment of any such invoice shall not be considered to be evidence of performance by the ARCHITECT to the point indicated by such invoice or of receipt or acceptance by the COUNTY of the work covered by such invoice. ARTICLE XI OTHER CONDITIONS OR SERVICES 11.1 INSURANCE 11.1.1 The ARCHITECT shall file with the COUNTY a Certificate of Errors and Omissions Insurance having minimum limits of One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence and annual One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) aggregate. Such Errors and Omissions Insurance shall have a deductible not in excess of Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($200,000.00) self-insured. Such Certificate shall bear the endorsement "Not to be canceled without thirty (30) days prior notice to BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS." The ARCHITECT shall maintain the Errors and Omissions Insurance at all times this Agreement is in effect and for a period of five (5) years after completion of the Project. Failure to maintain the required insurance shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Agreement. 11.1.2 The ARCHITECT shall also provide Worker's Compensation, automobile and comprehensive general liability policies. The ARCHITECT shall deliver the insurance certificates to the COUNTY. The coverage provided herein shall contain an endorsement providing thirty (30) days notice to the COUNTY prior to any cancellation of coverage. Said coverage shall be written by an insurer acceptable to the COUNTY and shall be in a form acceptable to the COUNTY. If the ARCHITECT has canceled or allowed to lapse any of these insurance policies then the COUNTY may pay for such insurance and may hold the amount of such payment out of the ARCHITECT's fees or be otherwise reimbursed. Failure to maintain the required insurance shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Agreement. Agreement Between County and Architect Page 8 of 10 11.2 PERIODS OF SERVICE 11.2.1 The ARCHITECT shall begin work immediately upon receipt of the Notice-to-Proceed in writing by the COUNTY or the COUNTY's designee. The project will proceed according to the schedule shown in Exhibit "A." The schedule makes certain assumptions regarding review processes and other activities that are beyond the control of the ARCHITECT. 11.2.2 Working days shall be defined as standard workdays between Monday and Friday, exclusive of holidays. 11.2.3 This schedule assumes an orderly progression of the ARCHITECT'S services. Delays beyond the control of the ARCHITECT may be cause for extension of this period of service, in which case the ARCHITECT shall submit in writing to the COUNTY its request for such extensions a minimum of thirty(30) calendar days prior to the end of the affected service period. 11.2.4 If the COUNTY has requested significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project, the time or performance of the ARCHITECT'S services shall be adjusted equitably. Agreement Between County and Architect Page 9 of 10 This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above. The undersigned officers and/or agents of the parties hereto are the properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolution extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in force and effect. BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS THE ARKITEX STUDIO,INC. Duane Peters, County Judge by: Principal Acting by and through the authority of the Brazos County Commissioners Court Attest: County Clerk Approved as to Form: General Council Agreement Between County and Architect Page 10 of 10 PROPOSAL PROJECT:Brazos County Ashford Hills Warehouse and Office Suites April 21 2025 Arkitex A p I Studio The Arkitex Studio,Inc.is pleased to offer this proposal for Architectural&Engineering services for this project. Based on our observations and discussions,the following information is provided for your review: Owner Architect Brazos County Purchasing Department The Arkitex Studio,Inc. 200 S.Texas Avenue,Suite 352 308 North Bryan Avenue Bryan,Texas 77803 Bryan,Texas 77803 Phone#979-361-4290 Project Description Brazos County will be developing a vacant property on Ashford Hills Road for a new warehouse and office suite building. The warehouse portion will include approximately 10,000 sf of unconditioned warehouse and approximately 10,000 sf of conditioned warehouse,both with pallet rack storage systems up to 3 levels high. The pallet rack storage system will be included with the building design. Additional conditioned office space is needed for Central Receiving,Records Management,District Clerk Storage,and Voter Records. These 4 departments will share building services such as restrooms, mechanical room and break room. There will be approximately 12 occupants in the building. The building will have a loading dock for multiple semi-truck and trailers and will have a ramp for ground level deliveries. The site will include covered parking for new and surplus vehicles, surplus heavy equipment,trailers,and container units. This space is anticipated to park approximately 40 vehicles. The site and building are to have video surveillance. Security fencing around the perimeter of the site will be required as will a required landscaping/buffer zone. A construction budget was not provided;however,we anticipate the construction cost to be around $8,000,000. The County would like the project design completed by October 1, 2025. The documents are to be prepared for Competitive Sealed Proposals. Scope of Services The Architect shall provide Architectural, Structural, Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing/Fire Sprinkler Engineering, Civil Engineering, Data/IT Consulting, and Cost Estimating services. This includes Programming, Schematic Design, Design Development, Construction Documents, Bidding/Negotiation/Permit, and Construction Administration Services per the standard AIA definition of "Scope of Architect's Basic Services" (AIA B101). Specifications will be provided to accompany the construction drawings,for use in defining the nature of materials and quality. Interim progress sets will be provided for Owner review and approval at the end of each phase. After each phase review,written approval of the work will be required prior to proceeding to the next phase. A cost estimate will be provided at SD,DD,50%CD,and 100%CD phases. Fire sprinkler design is included in the scope of work. A Building Information Model(BIM)will be produced as part of the design services and will be available to the Owner and Contractor. Requirements&Exclusions Furniture and equipment selection services are not included. Life Cycle Cost analysis is also excluded from our scope of work. A survey and geotechnical report are required for our services and are not included in this scope. The Owner is responsible for providing the survey and geotechnical investigation/report for the project. Terms and Conditions Contract Architectural/Engineering Services will be provided in accordance with the Brazos County Professional Services Contract. 308 N.Bryan Avenue,Bryan,TX 77803 I www.arkitex.com 1979.821.2635 Standard of Care The standard of care for architectural services provided under this agreement will be performed with the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession under similar circumstances,at the same time and in the same or a similar locale. Fee and Schedule Proposal We propose to provide architectural services for a fixed fee of$715,000. The fee includes mechanical,electrical, plumbing engineering services by Cleary Zimmerman,structural engineering services by Dudley,civil engineering services by Kimley Horn,Data/IT services by DataCom,and cost estimating by AGICM. The fee is divided into the following percentages by phases: Programming 1% $8,000 Schematic Design 22% $155,000 Design Development 17% $122,000 Construction Documents 38% $271,000 DESIGN FEE TOTAL 78% $556,000 Bidding/Negotiation/Permit 5% $34,000 Construction Administration 17% $125,000 BN/CA TOTAL 22% $159,000 Reimbursable expenses are not included in this amount and will be invoiced as a separate amount at 1.15 times their actual expense incurred. All expenses will be justified by provision of records or receipts. Reimbursable expenses may include prints/copies,Texas Accessibility Review/Inspection fees,mileage costs,and other items as approved by the Owner. Additional Services, for work beyond the original scope, shall be based on the hourly rates as set forth in the attached rate sheets for each discipline. Additional Services will not be performed without written approval between the Owner and Architect. Invoices will be sent monthly,proportionate to the work accomplished,and are payable within 30 days of the date of invoice. If not paid within 30 days,unpaid balances will accrue interest at a rate of 10%per annum or 0.833 per month. We are excited about the project and are prepared to begin the work immediately,upon your acceptance of the terms of this Proposal by signature below. If these services of this agreement have not been completed within 48 months from the date of this agreement,through no fault of the Architect,extension of the Architect's services beyond that time shall be renegotiated. Signed, Approved Michael S.Record,AIA Duane Peters Principal County Judge The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners has jurisdiction over individuals licensed under the Architect's Registration Law, Texas Civil Statutes,Article 249A. The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners may be contacted using the following information: P.O.Box 12337,Austin,TX 78711-7337,or 333 Guadalupe,Suite 2-350,Austin TX 78701-3942,phone 512-305- 9000 or on the web at www.tbae.state.tx.us. 2 308 N.Bryan Avenue,Bryan TX 77803 I www.arkitex.coml 979.821.2635 HOURLY RATES ~ PROJECT:Brazos County Ashford Hill Warehouse and Office Suites 2025 Arki`ex Date: April Studio The Arkitex Studio,Inc.hourly rates are as follows: Principal $250.00 Architect $200.00 Project Manager $165.00 Project Staff $110.00 Project Intern $ 90.00 Administrative Staff $ 90.00 Dudley Engineering hourly rates are as follows: Principal $295.00 Project Manager $245.00 Project Engineer $220.00 Technician/Drafter $190.00 Clerical $140.00 Clear Zimmerman Engineering hourly rates are as follows: Principal $305.00 Electrical Engineer $235.00 Mechanical Engineer $230.00 Mechanical Designer $185.00 Electrical Designer $195.00 Plumbing Designer $180.00 Construction Inspector $180.00 Technology Designer $185.00 Modeling Technician $145.00 Clerical $125.00 Accounting $185.00 Kimley Horn hourly rates are as follows: Analyst $160-$245 Professional $230-$295 Senior Professional I $255-$350 Senior Professional II $335-$370 Senior Technical Support $155-$280 Support Staff $110-$145 Technical Support $125-$150 AGICM hourly rates are as follows: Cheif Estimator-QA/QC $200.00 Senior Estimator-MEP Systems and Utilities $150.00 308 N.Bryan Avenue,Bryan,TX 77803 I www.arkitex.com 1979.821.2635 Senior Estimator-Structural and Site $125.00 Senior Estimator-Architectural $125.00 DATACOM hourly rates are as follows: Principal $218.00 Project/Program Manager $192.00 Senior Technology Consultant $184.00 Technology Consultant $152.00 Contract Administration $108.00 BIM/Revit Support $86.00 Technology Support $74.00 Administrative/Accounting $64.00 308 N.Bryan Avenue,Bryan,TX 77803 I www.arkitex.com 1979.821.2635 _, • 'I-, ; 308 N. Bryan Ave. Bryan,TX 77803 j P(979) 821-2635 F (979) 775-8224 ,- www.arkitex.com Improving Lives. (" Building Community. r I , . 10 , ..ij ... .-.-..,.. -----,t:24:7-._ ,,,,m,....,,.47._ eases- '. �� R Inl a o' f� !J I L • f1� 1■■7II1I ti • Fr! IV . ii " ir' sae' r I -� ,, ". _Rl� li<: 91 S� Pi - IV ... _ : - /1 // .\----3. ::) - 1.7 � r . 1 r' ,:• • • 1,,[, - 1 - i lir f !, . : ,,,.._-. •::,,06-4 , ... ... , -.-„•,;..,.. .. ,..„-u.. ,,,, ,.., ,-.... .,..,___ , , . • ,.... ; ., Lk' . — r-7--.,.r.---�.fir- ,.7 r -.-_sue.. -i -, _ p ,I.0. .::.� v,.R ,7., . S ,.. , t- Statement of Qualifications `- BRAZOS COUNTY , " REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Cl` ASHFORD HILLS WAREHOUSE RFQ No. CIP 25-529 1 .28.2025 9 0 0 f Arkitex 5mdlu * p, � 'Q REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS RFQ NO. CIP 25-529 I ARCHITECT FOR ASHFORD HILLS WAREHOUSE & OFFICE SUITES SEALED STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATION TO BE ' SUBMITTED BEFORE: Tuesday, January 21, 2025, 2:00pm CST L TO THE: BRAZOS COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 200 S. Texas Ave. Suite 352 • Bryan,TX 77803 Phone: (979) 361-4290 () Fax: (979) 361-4293 Respondents, their employees and/or representatives are prohibited from contacting any official or femployee of Brazos County, except the Purchasing Agent, regarding this solicitation from the issuing date of the solicitation until scheduled oral presentations or the date the Brazos County Commissioners Court meets to consider award of the Request for Qualifications(RFQ).Any such contact will be grounds for rejection of the respondent's proposal. In compliance with this solicitation, the undersigned respondent having examined the solicitation and specifications and being familiar with the conditions to be met, hereby submits the following RFQ for furnishing the services listed on the attached bid form and agrees to deliver said items at the locations and for the prices set forth on the bid form. Company Name: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. By(Print): Mike Record,AIA Title: Principal-In-Charge 308 N. Bryan Bryan,TX 77803 Physical Address: ry Ave., ry `- Mailing Address: 308 N. Bryan Ave., Bryan,TX 77803 Telephone: 979.821.2635 Fax:979.775.8224 E-Mail: msr@arkitex.com u Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 2 U U U U January 28,2025 Arkitex (U Brazos County Purchasing Department t' 10 Attn:Selection Committee 308 N.Bryan Ave. 200 S.Texas Ave.,Suite 352 Bryan,TX 77803 C Bryan,TX 77803 P(979)821-2635 F(979)775-8224 U Dear Selection Committee Members, www.arkitex.com At Arkitex Studio,we recognize that the Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites represents more than just a building—it's a key investment in the future of Brazos County,designed to enhance accessibility,foster growth,and serve the community.As a long-time partner to the County with a deep understanding of your U goals,we are uniquely positioned to bring this project to fruition,leveraging our proximity,relationships, Ul and a proven ability to deliver complex,high-stakes facilities with the support of our trusted consultants. With our extensive experience in designing warehouse and office spaces for both publicly and privately funded projects,we are confident that we can deliver a facility that meets both your functional and aesthetic aspirations. U U We believe Arkitex Studio is the ideal architectural partner for this project for several key reasons: u A Proven Partner with Brazos County Arkitex has had the privilege of working with Brazos County for the past six years,during which we have consistently demonstrated our commitment to delivering thoughtful,results-oriented solutions that align U; with the County's long-term objectives.Our history with the County reflects a foundation of trust,built on , our ability to offer strategic recommendations that prioritize your best interests.This strong partnership has U enabled us to collaborate seamlessly on a variety of projects,ensuring successful outcomes at every stage. We are confident that this experience positions us uniquely to continue providing the high level of service and expertise you deserve.We look forward to the opportunity to support your upcoming design project and to furthering our successful partnership. Expert Team,Comprehensive Capability U For this project,we have assembled a talented team with deep expertise in designing secure,functional,and visually appealing warehouse and office spaces.Our trusted partners include civil engineer Kimley-Horn, U who brings specialized experience in civic projects and can address traffic and parking as-needed,as well as structural engineers from DUDLEY and MEP consultants from Cleary Zimmermann,all'of whom have de- • cades of experience working on civic projects.Having worked together as a cohesive team for many years, Ui we have developed an efficient,collaborative process that is essential to delivering complex projects on time and within budget. V Commitment to Excellence in Design and Delivery With a design studio just down the street from the project site,we can provide hands-on attention and fos- O ter strong communication with the County's stakeholders.Our project management framework emphasizes schedule adherence,budget control,and meticulous quality assurance.Brazos County has been our partner, C.` our neighbor,and our priority.We are honored by the opportunity to continue this relationship and to con- - tribute meaningfully to the future of our shared community. Thank you for considering our qualifications.We look forward to the opportunity to collaborate and further discuss how Arkitex Studio can contribute to realizing the vision for the Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites. Sincerely, • U / U` O Mike Record,AIA Principal U Arkitex Studio 308 N.Bryan Ave.Bryan,TX 77803 979.821-2635 O msr@arkitex.com CREATIVITY 1 INTELLIGENCE I PASSION 1 SERVICE I INTEGRITY U C 0 `J TABLE OF CONTENTS Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 Arkitex C; Stud to Requirements for Statement of Qualifications LJ • SECTION Pages • Section 0 Part 1 -General Information 6 C Section 0 Part 2-Organization 8 Section 0 Part 3-Experience of Firms.Proposed Personnel 14 Section 0 Part 4-Process of Planning and Project Management 24 } Section 0 Part 5-Firms Proposed Subcontractors 31 -• ' Section 0 Part 6-Schedule and Budget Control 65 C Section 0 Part 7-Uniqueness 70 rt U Sections P,Q,R,S.&T 71 ..` re: h4�r ../4 "-s-s, ,,),\ 01- .6 r. 1 , t 3 r Y�� Yx'f 5� Y i A. @ lh r 1�,yx a a s 5 t.a ts't*`4 Il V{ 1`♦ �- j 5t' a! _a -- - —1 —____A—_—__I, —— --=;1 �1 - • --=- GfF1 r ! Y r { Yam"".-"....,s, .� - • ;t` P �., `. ;'Fa �1 �,.-F--- r t, . F ,%4: .,� -'-'ifa s, '1` r•. wl ,-.w. ;tr e 3�,�;;a" _�'-r c, t �".,;a- � ''• ��y rU�.-:� �..-.�,-'.. „�,..q i1 r .� �'i�'�'�''•a"� A -Q.0 �S ,��'_. x h 'bJ."- '.�at v*.._. a,�'" ."�y'9£'li �T • ,..'� • �.• r M' '3�,a�;f r�' *ram; r`r r.�u �" -a ;A N;. -'- `k Y., i ` -4. us 4' •M' f .al,. '�' ?it /3,; • re -'". -. tr r,'i",v ,"S ,x a, } >tiA t - ,,sa'PYw `',` yam=` .i ..... . �• `' -} "4 ' `� ''" :,..41 � i.."-.M;d r r .. A 44 X 41. -�`�s� -Y % 4,.}`,b -pi g* ,� *� y no&• 3' 3R$} yam 4 ' • "v- rytyr - Fti -4 �. �" `t ? G-rr•-� '� r.- M'- r s \ •.t-Zt1 4 i � ''✓,sE ':$ xa 'o�+i it --'44 '�t� �z kr' 2."- `�,f ,. -`" ;'��i' ..�'.aF c.; w-v^ - ' :_ o Sk •0`" y."l�"� . r' �*. ;� .@ ]�..'K-' it l G � '\ Imo, (/1�+�',, �'/��'�`Jl �i r f r r . •w ^3y� •��.�`� Cit'""t"t"y°T.a,�'i.C"� .'.� t �:�,r�'-' � °� `�''`y�'y�''y -y5 �" v a!'-v-•''' SD.v. .i -",-;&..'- -'lex.'tJ`s �--”e4 r.- 7 . e'N?,44.'"-,:* a"`"Pa'a b}.. .T" ._�..•� •--o �A • 4 •'Se`{.»u.. • L •,,n mars. .:r�'c A.z`i �, Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 3 U •-ei,\'`. , \-ok'•••„z,•\:, - , ..„. r-, ,..... .. ,_. :,., '''z----'---- -.A . , . . . . s„.. ,.,.,:.,,. .. ---,- . N. _ . , :.:\-\\ \ „x \ • SECTION O -PAR r�1 '- GENERAL INFOR—MATlON �,. ,4 ?,, � a_ ---- y7 eve. :] "N .:.40.0i0,1110iultikf . 1 - \ 5 - r�_ . e , II fopy Y• - _ n — - _-_ _ _- l4ii+v.�wV^-.+µv�dd,-llll4 '��nq:. i, Li �- , � QI `'^ . '© CCU ,� h _ q , �� °© � . i s v00 C� JciC �% :i r © Q❑ , I I_ta- '.•--- ft: - iJQ❑ ;�ZC®i_ _S_ , \ -_.f�, ......_ q-, - ..-4, ti, , / Iii=i17/41 44 A t ., cif, a :'ti 4' ` r_i ✓mot�_ „ F a };t� ; , \ v , • ,k v T • 4, A _ f r \� • ht 4.�k rat Y �, . ! SY. • r \ ♦ sr s . .\ p ' ,- , ' U 0 U SECTION 0 PART 1 -GENERAL INFORMATION ,0jArkoltex a GENERAL INFORMATION U U Section la-f U — Arkitex Studio- Prime Firm Arkitex Studio is an alliance combining the personal and project experience of Eva Read-Warden,AIA,Mike U Record,AIA,and Paul Martinez,AIA.Founded in 1995 and incorporated in 1996,the Arkitex Studio team has , been serving our Texas region for 29 years with unique design solutions for a wide variety of project types. v Looking to immerse ourselves in the community,we acquired a 1927 former dry goods store in Historic `� Downtown Bryan and adapted it to serve as our offices. With our locally-based staff of 14,we have completed numerous projects across the Brazos Valley and beyond.Arkitex Studio has built relationships across the area,including local consultants,contractors, � ) subcontractors,and suppliers.We have intimate knowledge of the local processes,design criteria,and requirements. U As architectural leaders,the Arkitex Studio staff is what makes the customer experience different from any . other architectural firm.As a result,the processes and project approaches are different and the solutions U Arkitex Studio provides make a difference in our community.Arkitex Studio is a boutique firm by design. We don't work everywhere.We work here in Texas.We live here in Texas.We play here in Texas.We have a U' vested interest in the projects we pursue because often,we get to enjoy them ourselves as members of the - community. The Arkitex Studio is a woman and minority owned firm holding a HUB certification with the State of Texas. v a Name of Firm:The Arkitex Studio, Inc. Address:308 N. Bryan Ave.,Bryan,TX 77803 C, Phone:979.821..2635 Ownership:Corporation k- Established: 1995,incorporated 1996, C. Primary Contact:Mike Record,AIA Umsrftarkitex.com a'' "A d i� 0 Arkitex Quic6t facts: U f - - �.• �� ;{, �'''- , - _ - -i ��;::" Founded 1995 I 14 staff members. . i• i�� �— _lima.L ., �' !Average staff tenure 10+years ,- , , 14 nk I } = I ICountries/territories represented in our - 'i�i�, il - office:Argentina,Iran,South Africa,Puerto U '..)a1 l , t 411 .< I ,i.1 1, - Rico;.and the United States 4. 6 i V., ,fi,j { '' i a Q o r L,- �` , . n, 75%of our work is for repeat clients C '--i �8.0+number of publicly funded':projects in the' (_) l._ - qi P - - _ last 5 years ;r'� J �_ _ _ l� Served the Brazos 1/alley for 30 years 4 - - - �`�` [Woman&minorityowned firm with a HUB Certification with e State of Texas Arkitex Studio Office,Tremont Building,Downtown Bryan,TX U 0 Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 6 U (1 . ' ' ;40011,: SECTION 0 PART TWO ORGANIZATION Y -. . AArrkitex ...:::. r �s 9�l j J Ff h. i ny v . P at': w n�4 s • :a'�S r Y•: ;- _ -om i • aY 's __ , . i ..om .. �,, - s' ,yf it, . ...._ -,,, •''• Vitt, , 44 . ..- -_ _:-. d Y • r �M � `lam ../•'• ' a �• ie FS I• ..vxF �. .', two �� y' T t a ' ., �.r J. 0 • C L; SECTION O PART 2-ORGANIZATION ,,-- - - • " - Arkitex W.G L; ORGANIZATION ARKITEX STUDIO -. 2a-d. c_ju Arkitex Studio C) 2a.How many years has your organization been in business in its current capacity? 30 years. L 2b.How many years has your organization been in business under its present name?Under what former names has you organization operated? , 30 years.Arkitex Studio has not operated under any other name(s). \--/ 2c.Organizational Chart An organizational chart detailing the entire project team is shown on the following page. 2d.If your organization is a corporation,answer the following:Date of incorporation,State of incorporation,President's name,Nice President's name(s),Secretary's name,Treasure's name. L'' Date of incorporation: December 9, 1996 C; State of incorporation:Texas President's name:Eva Read-Warden,AIA-Principal In Charge Vice President's name(s):Mike Record,AIA-Principal In Charge Secretary's name:Paul Martinez,AIA-Associate Principal `-' Treasure's name:N/A U V "`a,, �` 1 t; ' :a 1 rt .,F • tom• fr : A -,i L� .i4 4' .,. • ,, i i•.„, h `.. i y� f'V.,- ' ..4b .. , A k 9Ta '� 101 ' y( • 9 ,may rvj o i Ixe 0. i' 9 ♦• w,,0i %L ..,a Y • 1 i •a ~ ' t - r•St c&'t t�' '}� r IL .p` ia,,.y . m.-$.4..�' ..r :. � y"6:• I 4 \. ,, , ,k..,, ,, ,',..,:4„, . ,....„:„...„1%,...4.....7.,i tote,„:6„.,_..J.,.,„..,3,..1:10.4r..,;. loop„:„..„... „,...,..1.,„7,,,,,,,,,:...„.„,.7„:,., :1,1..1.4,, ,„:,,,,,„,,,Hrtm„.:1::::,.. ._.N., it., ___ , .„... ,,,c_...• • ......, „. . ...;.....4.,,,z,,,, .,..„.„1,7_,.._.4,...:, _ ..) , . , .7, i_ . — ,4.1-, :-..vrt, 4-1-v. ,-4- ... .,---,. _ .3 . --ri.v-0,-y?„ 7,-. - - ._-- - ‘1 , .,. 1 ... .., - k.\ v ., _ 'A4ri, , .&.. • .4 . ..;; p... f •,t 1-- • •v!,: 4•. C 0. �,d-,/;7 i 44`.. ni, :,, o 2'f? i3- „ i1 1 41+ ,, 3, - g :A • -,.,,at;:".?;.e..'llegig'll ,.‘'. at 1 ;: ''..1", :-.V ktil6;7 •-&,..` ,5.--'-'3' ' 'r"' • .1 -.'t.' ‘ "' ' 't V-'1,',k ..., . ',:',' (‘.'t ..1- .,.' . -./1 .1 '''.-. ''.,...'. .' -. . N,4 • d v,1, 1! ; 7 E 1, \ 4 ,t- 4...•• t Q•4? ; `,. :l I fey a4 \ �,�f' �' 1 i • lC 1 f' M ` / :- 1 1 5 •'- 1+' t •_ i o .' p , - • --1,1sr y • ,r. „ - 0 Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 8 LJ n\. _ .. SECTION 0 PART 2-ORGANIZATION 1 r--\ Arkitex ,----., ( , •10 C ASHFORD HILLS WAREHOUSE & OFFICE SUITES PROJECT n ORGANIZATIONAL CHART rs-s, ,_ , 2c.Organizational Chart /--- n BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS ,---, - • " r; Arkitex Studio Arkitex Studio C Mike Record,.AIA , . . Paul Martinez, AIA n, Principal-In-Charge Project Architect!Project - QA/C1C, Manager (-- rTh . . _. . Arkitex Studio n Pamela da Graca, Al.A n Project Designer n -- n ,----) Cleary Zimmerman '..,„ Kimley-Horn .• 'DataCorn ..,---, t , AilEP.Enqiekeering', .‘ Civil Emjineering • '.`..,DatalIT/Secirity .. . , .....• . .•.-. . r.. - , ,Zac Stevenson,PE . 2, Annie Briscoe, PE i Dan Walker (-) ' . Michael Dapiel,PhD;PE - , (--) . ._ Hunter Ridiii Cek,PE , • - • rm . , . . . r", I _ . . .. . -. ... ( 0 . r•\, • ,.: .. , • DUDLEY AG'ICM ', n Structural Engineering Cost Estimating . ., r•-•-•- Drew•budley,PE Lorenzo Ma. . rtinez,CPE n Rickflobertson,PE , • Caleb Ray,PE - . . Taylor Stinson,PE n n r-, ,---, ,. • Km. • / r--.. ._,I , Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 ( . ._., 9 c Mike Record, AlA ' ci, Principal-In-Charge Arkitex-; � Background: 0.' 1 Mike joined The Arkitex Studio in 1997 after working in Reston,Virginia and Houston.Mike has been the Principal-In-Charge responsible for many publicly funded projects across Texas.He is well versed in L% ' �\ working on campuses and in occupied buildings.Mike is an excellent / practitioner,with keen attention to detail and 35 years of experience. His design work for the 120 Main Street Renovation project received 0tid ` the 2005 Excellence in Architecture Merit award from AlA Brazos. O BRAZOS COUNTY TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE EXTENSION OFFICE U Bryan,TX I Principal-In-Charge This nearly 10,000 SF building houses offices,meeting and conference U space,and storage facilities.Special considerations included the Experience: provision of a multi-use conference room with a teaching kitchen and 36 years experience future ability to subdivide the space when needed. C) 26 years with Arkitex Studio COLLEGE STATION FACILITY MAINTENANCE BUILDING C• Education: College Station,TX I Principal-In-Charge • -, Bachelor of Environmental Design This two-story 10,600 sq ft pre-engineered metal building,with u Tau Sigma Delta Honors a metal panel siding exterior,serves as the new College Station C Texas A&M University, 1987 Facility Maintenance Building.It includes 3 drive through bays, work area,office space,restrooms,break room,site,and parking lot O Registration: improvements.Working closely with the City Project Manager and Architect,Texas General Contractor allowed us to avoid issues with long lead times on ' Registration#14376 materials and products Location: .TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AGRILIFE PHEOTYPING GREENHOUSE V Bryan,TX i.College Station,TX I Principal-In-Charge O This Texas A&M University AgriLife Phenotyping Greenhouse includes Memberships&Leadership: two greenhouses connected to a head house by an enclosed link as L Texas Society of Architects well as outdoor space for soil processing, storage, and root washing. American of Architects The head house includes not only the typical support work spaces, but BrazosU raChapter Institute of Architects et also an instrument lab, a wet lab,and an imaging station.The facilities U p provide flexibility for multidisciplinary research, including investigators 2001 from agriculture,life science,and engineering backgrounds. 0 O BRAZOS COUNTY ESD 4 FIRE STATION 2 Snook,TX I Principal-In-Charge U - - - Addition and renovation of an existing 1970's pre-engineered metal - building fire station.The addition includes two new apparatus bays on C the West end of the building.The renovation includes the replacement a of the building façade,all windows,as well as site improvements such. as new concrete parking lot,pre-engineered metal building canopy, O _ and brick street sign. a • TDI BROOKS C College Station,TX I Principal-In-Charge ''-� After preparing a master plan for their 53-acre property, The Arkitex "�j� I I 1 Studio designed 3 buildings forTDl-Brooks. The first building was 0 ', a large warehouse/shop structure. A second phase included office and laboratory buildings. The office has a modern architectural 0 • character rooted in Texas vernacular. The exteriors feature clean lines, P z, .coUNrr. simple le massing,and wide overhangs protecting soft green glazing. Moll p,mc P, U . I i_ Exterior finishes are a textural contrast of limestone,dark wood,and I 'll ' 1 Y a galvanized metal roof. Leaning timber support posts and a scissor- -:: truss covered entry add dynamism to the composition.The prominent L . cross-gable entry element extends through the entire building to a rear - • . covered entertainment pavilion. Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 10 (-, Paul Martinez, AM I ,- Project Architect/Project Manager Arkitex r-, ,- IO ` ' fl .� 1, Background• , Paul joined The Arkitex Studio in August of 2009,after working several �..0 y-----') ears for a firm based out of Fort Worth,Texas.He graduated from (') Prairie View A&M University with a Bachelor of Architecture in 2003 and r a Master of Architecture in 2004. Being a native to the Bryan/College ,\,,b 111 Station area,Paul and his family wanted to return to the community i with a desire to witness and be involved with the future growth of his hometown..Paul's experience includes higher education,commercial fl office,retail,single-family residential,and multifamily residential , architecture with projects throughout Texas,Louisiana,and Oklahoma; Experience: as well as projects in Missouri,Kansas,Alabama,and South Carolina. 20 years experience Paul is a member of the Brazos Chapter of the American Institute of ; .. 15 years with Arkitex Studio Architects.He served as a program coordinator and instructor for the Architecture in Schools Program,introducing Architecture to 4th n Education: graders. Bachelor of Architecture,Magna Cum Laude, TEXAS A&M COMPUTING SERVICES CENTER fl Prairie View A&M University,2003 College Station,TX I Project Manager This renovation of the first floor of a 1959 building with a 1993 i _ Master of Architecture, addition is now a one-stop-shop for IT services.The square footage Prairie View A&M University,2004 on the renovation area is approximately 14,600 sf. The renovation Registration: includes some exterior work,including a new canopy and new window Architect,Texas openings.The interior work includes new walls,doors,ceilings, Registration#23204 . restrooms, HVAC,electrical and plumbing systems.Converting an existing office space into a modern computing services center with Location: a more efficient flow and cutting-edge technology to better serve Bryan,TX customers. . BLINN DINING HALL RENOVATIONS Memberships&Leadership: Brenham,TX I Project Manager (Th Texas Society of Architects As the number of on-campus residential students increased,Blinn r, American Institute of Architects College in Brenham needed to expand the capabilities of their Brazos an InsChapttitute AIA,f Architects Presid et dining services. Arkitex Studio and their consultants studied ways to increase seating capacity within the existing dining services area. By 2019 reconfiguring the space and changing the way in which food service is 1-- provided,the project increased the serving capacity from 1300 to 1700 ,,_, meal plans. Neutral colors with blue accents updated the existing early • . ! __ ;_` �� � panels draw 1990s appearance while modern light fixtures and graphic pan draw (- 4, ' attention u ,taking advantage of the space's volume. Design services -. Al c,/�' were completed in time to order food service equipment in the spring ' ' .)- . '.._ \� I. It, to expedite summer construction. -� Ph• _ --billl i' • BRENHAM WORKFORCE TRAINING CENTER 4 Brenham,TX I Project Manager ' '�� ''1 II' '!.., The clients needed additional space for their technical training r= _ ,d �°a'� - programs that includes a classroom,welding lab,and construction lab." ''`- ' '' y�" I�° new annex buildin was situated next to an existin buildin that F f, 1 r.,; serves the same purpose and are linked together by a wide sidewalk. f' c — _ . ."'`4 Color patterning was also used on the interior flooringto provide ' .�� ` yP ' d design tothe space on a limited budget. In the labortoris,special � ' � I re' exhausting was designed to alleviate harmful fumes from the building. �. "" Prior to construction,it became apparent that the limited budget :.l f��� � ; would impact the owner's desired scope.Reductions were made to stay '', `— • ,. within budget,yet allow for future expansion. x 1 Construction phase services included careful attention to submitted • materials.Several cases occurred where materials deviated from r"--, specifications,requiring extra attention to ensure the end product met design requirements. ) Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 ' 11 ,Th U 0 k Pamela da Graca, AIA � Project Designer Arki ite x I lilt 0 E' } 1 Background: t1 i = ' Pamela joined The Arkitex Studio in 2010 after a year working in L% ` �__. 1� historic site documentation.Her project experience with The Arkitex `� Studio includes institutional,municipal, and private sector work. Pamela's background in English and writing instilled a deep respect for the importance of communication. She brings creativity,critical thinking,and a commitment to excellence to her work,promoting sustainable design,preservation,and architecture as a means to U benefit both her clients and the community overall. .-) Pamela was the 2021 President of the Brazos Chapter of the.American ` Experience: Institute of Architects. She led the chapter's effort to procure and () 14 years experience coordinate study materials for local architecture licensure candidates %�\ 14 years with Arkitex Studio and has served as editor for the AIA Brazos newsletter,Archivoltum. She currently serves as Brazos Chapter Director on the Board for the -• Education: Texas Society of Architects. U Bachelor of Environmental Design BRAZOS COUNTY AGRILIFE EXTENSION OFFICE •� Tau Sigma Delta Honors Project Manager TX • Texas A&M University,2007 Bryan, u This nearly 10,000 SF building houses offices,meeting and conference Master of Architecture Graduate space,and storage facilities.Special considerations included the '7' Certificates in Sustainable provision of a multi-use conference room with a teaching kitchen '3 Urbanism&Historic Preservation and future ability to subdivide the space when needed.We provided - Texas A&M University,2009 a feasibility study of the existing building and used it as the basis of , design for programming. Registration: u Re g CITY OF COLLEGE STATION NORTHGATE PARK _ Architect,Texas College Station,TX I Project Manager Registration#27431 The park includes a pavilion,drinking fountains,picnic facilities, NCARB Cert.Holder#92621 new lighting,sidewalks,and landscape improvements. Primary current/not expired considerations in the design included minimizing maintenance Location: requirements,developing details which would both fit into the u Bryan,TX .rapidly modernizing aesthetic of the area and stand up to use in close proximity to the bar district frequented by students of the �--' Memberships&Leadership: university,and controlling costs while still working within the design 0Texas Society of Architects requirements of the Northgate District. American Institute of Architects CITY OF COLLEGE STATION VETERANS PARK COMPLEX College Station,TX I Pro ect Manager U Brazos Chapter AIA,President This project,currently in design,is to develop a master-plan for repairs, 2021 enhancements,and new signage/way-finding at Veterans Park.Arkitex Studio has designed two other projects at Veterans Park;the 9/11 U - - y Memorial and the War Memorial. U � ,' CITY OF BRYAN RENOVATION OF TEMPLE FREDA i= - ' Bryan,TX I Project Manager =---_--� — 4- Built in the early 1910's to serve as the area's first dedicated Jewish V v.i.:.a'-I ��o .-, q; synagogue,this 1,500 SF temple in downtown Bryan fell into disrepair i BOO .Z -' and is no longer safe for use.As part of an effort by various local U `I� ' I groups,including the City of Bryan and members of the Jewish v ®1 - community, Arkitex Studio performed a facility assessment and 1ri-3 developed an outline of required work to submit with the grant `:; s application.This outline included the identification of problem areas on t, the building and recommendations of what work would be necessary U - 1 to save Tem le Freda and return it to a condition where it could once J� )'� again serve as a place of worship.The grant funds were received and a the repairs are currently in-progress. • u . 1 v Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 12 -..`4 x Year.`; I il' e .•S 5 �A ` • u `'pi a yt A `,: • f. k � � y .a4J^s 7 ._ *t t I`u. C z .` yyy x P� s 1 { le. 4,4 .. ',„-: r #t x . l x, +ram d-,;•, - - use, ' °fi; ; �r ;$EdIHON 0 PART THREE •EXPERIENCjE ®1FIRM/S PROPOSED PERSONNEL Arkitexv • m£ # »t j•L`ks=, laj-1. [ . . . • ! LJ i __ ,off" . 1 I_ *� I 1 - ','..:711111 . Ei I. I' i r I, J [ L7L fins't' ti *: i l , '[, bi = % I Y �: -- 1. - . C SECTION 0 PART 3-EXPERIENCE,OF FIRM'S.PROPOSED PERSONNEL r•. Arkitex 0 BRAZOS COUNTY AGRILIFE EXTENSION OFFICE C BRYAN,TEXAS `' ARKITEX STUDIO,DUDLEY Type: J New Construction ) Proje!ron get: Cost: - !I _ $2,169,339 --- • I ® =r rl®® �• Size: �_��`p p' 1:. :. .lei x:1, Nile 10,000 SF '-• ') �o_ ,i ,,A,it •: '_iS �- - `' `# �. _ ' L-',_ 'Y Project Completion 1Ii; i I l _�` Anticipated/Actual: , ti ' j _ I - January 2021 /August fir, �� 2021 ' _; i —�_ - - - '- - Number&Amount of Change Orders: �; •• -! 1 Owner Credit/$60,000 Services Provided: Prime Architect: Wit. '` \'' , ;-p:✓ - The Arkitex Studio, Inc • < � Arkitex Team: ._,,IC ,I` Mike Record,AIA --rz.1"::.'*.“`: _ - Pamela da Graca,AIA .IWOW • ,._s! Yr '- �� ', yl- '`" Consultants from I .-`' �- 1= , Proposed Project Team: -.�;\ ', P - J �� b a9ap �I�--.-z ,'>•") J/ (.N-..-• Structural DUDLEY Client Reference: • The Extension Office had occupied of the same building for decades and,in Charles Wendt that time,outgrown the space.Needing a new facility to better house their Brazos County current services and curricula,they hired us to help them develop a program of 979-361-4292 requirements and design for a new building. cwendt@brazoscountytx. gov • This nearly 10,000sf building includes offices,meeting and conference space,and storage facilities.Special considerations included the provision of a subdivide-able multi-use conference room with a teaching kitchen;security planning to keep ,_J parts of the facility locked while allowing after hours public access to others;high visibility to the exterior from the entrance area;and minimizing modifications to U the existing parking facilities while providing a protected drop off and outdoor • storage area. �; In addition to meeting the specified programmatic and functional needs of the County,this facility's design balanced the facility's security needs with an aspect -' which welcomes visitors and signals to the ublic valued placed in both the N programs offered and the community itself. _Jr' Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 14 /-- ---- l SECTION 0 PART 3 - EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED'PERSON;NEL / ' Arkitex %� BRAZOS COUNTY ESD 4 FIRE STATION 2 SNOOK,TEXAS r�' r`s, ARKITEX STUDIO,CLEARY-ZIMMERMANN ,-111Pr.; ' .ill Repno�&New Addition Project Budget: t - 411110-1 $780,000 �,, i - - Final Construction !� Cost: "�' • _� � - In-Progress d, ,ram . 0 _ Size: -. �-a e_ r 1,910 SF --, L d ❑ i. ,. ' - �jp , o o Project Completion �, QIOD ,l L1 too Anticipated/Actual: - [ a _ P� i is o March 2025/In-Progress . . - - —LI - _ _ Amount of � �- ;- Number �- -- - ` Change Orders: �!__' 0 to date(project in- '-i -11 - - /7/17n , . progress) Services Provided: Prime Architect: rTh Addition and renovation of an existing 1970's pre-engineered metal building The Arkitex Studio,Inc fire station.The addition includes two new apparatus bays on the West end of Arkitex Team: the building.The renovation includes the replacement of the building facade,all Mike Record,AIA -- windows,as well as site improvements such as new concrete parking lot,pre- -1 engineered metal building canopy,and brick street sign. Consultants from Proposed Project Team: ,-__,. MEP-Cleary- Zimmermann Client Reference: Ti Brazos County,TX Chief Joe Warren 979.209.5580 �. 0 fl Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 15 ,-, SECTION O'PARTS EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL ; . 3_ . . . . •...:. . .... .....4,. •. „..,. .• -,.•.__• ..,,,, U ,.. .,.. k ..,w.x,,-. ,.„... , -. .• . ... ..r„ . .�: Arkitex smaio • TDI BROOKS - WAREHOUSE/SHOP, OFFICES, • AND LABORATORY BUILDINGS __... WELLBORN,TEXAS ARKITEX STUDIO ' \;,\ l� 1:`��`A` Type: , „ - : ` ?�v,i \'� �, • New Construction • Project Budget: .., • S `` $5 Million • Nr f✓ - - ` � 11. _ ' X, Costl Construction ' ' L' ,-'11 ; '{-._-/ - '= _ ` i.11` ,x .- (` $5,065,500(3 Phases) • r v, a z . •• ;_ 3.� 1 _ 35,643 SF N s Size: ._; '= Project Completion , _ -- Anticipated/Act �. Via_, � '•I Mr---;•,---z-- Q.� � _1 July 2013/July 2013 N a _ i0- bib u w - ,e I u I.4) S .� Number&Amount of *,_ Change Orders: ''- �,r ;�-.t., r -_ — p• „ i` i x-h 6 (over3 phases).Total m � -� ' Q. -_ emshi,, i _ $65,500 or 1.3%oftotal r ears„,:- costs Services Provided: ;:� �s:• <;.,• 10': 1 Prime Architect: -„, / f_;��:x , • • '�_ f The Arkitex Studio,Inc d =' - `O Arkitex Team: er -' �� - Mike Record,AIA . Ap ® - , E_�tf Consultants from l , I• �.,i,ir r Proposed Project Team: =' .�:s.``� ''`� _ , s N/A 7 —p . l �t�` '1�, y ,... fI %. } ,, _ Owner: '1\* ,,( *,"° ` '� __-1- 7 Dr.James M.Brooks �. v 1� 0.i, • ;i ''�I i I i--= , . _..�E_ -.. President and CEO `� ! ,1®1 ,, Dr mbroo446 - o , , 1 �. ® P4m •� j @aol.com — _ ) ,:. -- - - Contractor: • After preparing a master plan for their 53-acre property, The Arkitex Studio Madison Construction • designed 3 buildings forTDI-Brooks. The first building was a large warehouse/ mrMike Jones , shop structure. A second phase included office and laboratory buildings. The onstr s@madison- c office has a modern architectural character rooted in Texas vernacular. The onstruction.com exteriors feature clean lines,simple massing,and wide overhangs protecting 979-324-9365 soft green glazing. Exterior finishes are a textural contrast of limestone,dark (no longer in business) wood,and a galvanized metal roof. Leaning timber support posts and a scissor- truss covered entry add dynamism to the composition.The prominent cross- gable entry element extends through the entire building to a rear covered entertainment pavilion. Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 16 u r�') I SECTION 0 PART 3-EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL Arkitex "', w.o _ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CENTRAL PARK NeweConstruction ,^, OPERATIONS CENTER Project Budget: COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS $5.8 Million ARKITEX STUDIO, KIMLEY-HORN,CLEARY ZIMMERMANN, & Final Construction ` DUDLEY, AGICM Cost: ---- $3,673,500 GMP "- Project in-progress . Size: _ .;A 11,500+5,000 SF - SY 4 y Project Completion `_ . Anticipated/Actual: i1 A' July 2025/In-Progress ,-, ;�, - -.— Ill , _ -- - -- - .✓ ti' Number&Amount of 12 ` I'I` _ �I Change Orders: I 0 to date(project in- a: ..�.£ ,, ro e V,p `_ 4, : ,--- °--- . _- progress) r,y �, �, ., Services Provided: ! / ., x Y _ ' h� Prime Architect i ' ` �� The Arkitex Studio, Inc -:-svik,..,;.!. ,...._,,, Arkitex Team: - -- #' - Mike Record,AIA ' a.e- .:`::.esf .- �: - rNr:a ; .,—.,,, F.R.. ,.;' , k. .:�'a ..-:z Consultants from _ COLLEGE STATION CENTRAL PARK OPERATIONS BUILDING • * i^.- . ', �.' Proposed Project Team: `--J �. Gm � � . y P� 4..�... Kimley-Horn, DUDLEY, ��>=fa � <: P ' r , Cleary Zimmermann, AG1CM • The Operations building at the City of College Station Central Park was outdated ,-) and too small to meet the current needs of the growing community.The City Owner: wanted to remove the existing building and build a new 11,500 sf 2-story Rusty Warncke building as it's replacement.They wanted to move the Forestry Department into City of College Station this building. As a result,another 5,000 sf storage building was added to the 979.764.3731 site.The larger building included offices,a conference room,restrooms,showers, rwarncke@cstx.gov ;, second floor conditioned storage,and 4 drive-thru bays.The smaller building `:_ has storage rooms and 4 drive-thru bays.The buildings are pre-engineered Contractor: , metal buildings.Site utilities were extended to complete water and electrical Kyle Mass "loops"around the site. Aggieland Construction kyle.maas@ aggielandconstruction. `--' com (-', 979.393.0080 = • _ --) t� Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIF 25-529 17 . SECTION 0 PART 3:-EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL Arkitex scram r . Type: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FACILITIES New Construction -, MAINTENANCE BUILDING Project Budget: - ' COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS GMP$1.77 Million ARKITEX STUDIO Final Construction • Cost: $1.8 Million t.,.(,it;1.9 3., '4 '' �ll�� i. \ Size* . 06 0SF « n '*.�f `' , y q..I� :,- '7' ,a Project Completion i � z ;�r ,, ,-'" �� --- AE'< •-r w. o- a Anticipated/Actual: 7-. • 1 ' l C7C _ -�-,,- -, �� , �'17 August 2021 /August _ Au us - '',' ', ' „i - ---- .. ` , 1 V.4'� 1,zr_�- 2021 -- 1 IIff i F, "1.,- --` ' }--,-. 7111'6 Number&Amount of ii II - ''. c ;....I. „ o`;o �� +i ° �? { ' °� Change Orders: "� „ o y$ � i 6 4I. "�' ; • . - 1 CO credit of$27,913 .- t ,, • , , iiI L eft`n - • ' 1 , T, Services Provided: ,calk Civil Engineering Design . t, g'I -M* i &Construction Admin. - �3.: V- ..'.. ... , .s , . �= .� ..._ f �_ Arkitex Team: Mike Record,AlA ,� , -.,� 41 Firms from Proposed .• ) 144, `1'� .. " . Project Team: "` _--�� Arkitex Studio,Cleary `'f �� `i1��4iGj;i,('�ili �t,�`!114 Zimmermann,DUDLEY �r _ ` Owner: _ ' Vile,..,,„ ` 11'; .' '�!r Jennifer Cain -, ,., ' ' City of College Station I 1; ;'',1 1,,,+,i l 979.764.3795 �_ I ;.:..:.,'..1;: jcain@cstx.gov (, l - , 0 i ill �s'' „�' + �� Contractor:o : ,I ,+� ,,�-� dyConstruction - a` }�-h's 979.774.5613 r- The Operations building at the City of College Station Central Park was outdated • and too small to meet the current needs of the growing community.The City '-'• wanted to remove the existing building and build a new 11,500 sf 2-story (--\ building as it's replacement.They wanted to move the Forestry Department into this building. As a result,another 5,000 sf storage building was added to the site.The larger building included offices,a conference room,restrooms,showers, second floor conditioned storage,and 4 drive-thru bays.The smaller building '_') has storage rooms and 4 drive-thru bays.The buildings are pre-engineered -, metal buildings.Site utilities were extended to complete water and electrical "loops"around the site. Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 18 rI SECTION 0 PART 3- EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL I Arkitex �- 5[odlo r• EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL - PROPOSED PERSONNEL:MIKE RECORD, AIA, PAUL MARTINEZ,AIA, & PAMELA DA GRAcA,AIA 3b.Provide a complete list of all projects currently in progress or completed by your firm's proposed personnel , within the last three(3)years. Arkitex Studio's Projects By Proposed Personnel Below is a comprehensive list of the projects that Arkitex's Proposed Project Personnel have worked on in `Th the last 3 years-2022,2023,&2024. (-N, Mike Record,AIA • NCTM Lab Renovations `- • Feasibility Study for Brazos County (--, • TAMU AgriLife Phenotyping Greenhouse • TAMUC Agricultural Multipurpose Education& • Varisco Spirits/Hush&Whisper Training Center s • Brazos County Extension Office • TAMU Mechanical Engineering Office Building • City of College Station Cemetery Shop Renovations • American Lumber Renovations • TAMU Heep Lab Renovation <_:' • American Lumber Pre-Design for Future • City of College Station Central Park Operations Headquarters Building • Matica Biotechnology • TAMU Langford Maker Space ( '1 • TAMU Secure America • City of College Station Carter Creek Wastewater r) • TAMU D.L.Houston Auditorium Upgrades Treatment Plan Office Remodel • City of College Station Facility Maintenance • Stone Co Climbing Company Expansion C- Building • TAMU Central Texas Warrior Hall Remodel �- • Highway 30 Office Buildings • TAMU Tarleton State Autry Building Restroom • Stone Co Climbing Company Upgrades C' • Kurten Fuel Stop • TAMU Borlaug Center for Southern Crop r- • TAMU Heep Window Replacement Improvements Greenhouses Renovation • TAMU Vivarium III • City of Bryan Signature Park r • Paddock Lane.Exterior Modifications • TAMU New Building for ENRTA • Space Plan for Oldham Goodwin • BTU Lake Bryan Master Plan • TEES Detonation Research Facility • Zoetis Office Addition • TAMU Aggie Park Garage(cancelled) • Brazos County Precinct 4 Fire Station • LSPI Lab Renovation • College Station Summit Crossing Park • CIADM Fill Finish • TEEX RELLIS Training Props C • Reed McDonald Suite 201 Renovation • Offices for Gold Stone Energy r `• • TAMU Coke Building Renovation • College Station Utilities Operations Expansion �� • LarryYoung Paving Headquarters • TEES National Hypersonic Wind Tunnel • TAMU HFS Classrooms • TVMDL Pathological Waste Incinerator (- • TAMU Lease Space at Varisco • Greens Prairie Reserve Amenities Building • Cancer Clinic Site Study • City of College Station Independence Park • TAMU HFS Classrooms • Renovation for Hyatt Place College Station CI • Hush&Whisper Barrel Storage • TAMU Reed McDonald Renovation to Suite#302 • TDI Brooks Warehouse Expansion (\' • New Building for StataCorp LLC Paul Martinez,AIA • Lease Spaces at Fitch Plaza • LSPT Feasibility Study • • City of College Station Cemetery Shop Building C-_'' • Lick Creek Park Bird Viewing Blinds • Brazos Valley Women's Center Renovation • City of College Station Veterans Memorial Master • Test-fit Design for St.Joseph's Medical Offices - Plan • TAMU Moore Communications Renovation I' • Legends Boat House - Highway 30 Office Buildings r- ti • TAMU KAMU Technical Operations Building • TAMU Heep Window Replacement • TAMU Construction Science Field Lab at RELLIS • Renovations for 511 University Drive ,) Brazos County!Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 ( - 19 (-.) L1 SECTION 0 PART 3-EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL •• Arkitex jStudio 3b.Provide a complete list of all projects currently in progress or completed by your firm's proposed personnel within the last three(3)years.(Cont.) `'' Arkitex Studio's Proposed Personnel Projects (Cont.) C` Below is a comprehensive list of the projects that Arkitex's Proposed Project Personnel have worked on in the last 3 years-2022,2023,&2024. • Remodel of 307 Boyett • Central Concession&Restroom Pavillion • LarryYoung Paving Headquarters • TAMU Mechanical Engineering Office Building '._ • Test-Fit for St Joseph's Texas Brain&Spine Center Renovations • Cancer Clinic Site Study • TAMU W.P. Luse Foundation/Stevenson TAMU KAMU Technical Operations Building Companion Animal Center Addition • NCTM Lab Renovations • Our Saviour's Lutheran Church Sanctuary ' •, • TAMU Heep Lab#320 Renovation Expansion • TAMU Tarleton State Autry Building Restroom • New Administration&Vocational Training Upgrades Building for SOS Ministries - • Zoetis Office Addition • TAMU CVMBS Equine Therapy Facility • TAMUS RELLIS Avenue D • City of College Station Veterans Memorial Park • Greens Prairie Reserve Amenities Building Master Plan • • City of College Station Utilities Operations • Feasibility Study for Brazos County Expansion • TAMUC Agricultural Multipurpose Education& • Renovations for Central Texas Orthopedics& Training Center Sports Medicine • TAMU Mechanical Engineering Office Building • Renovations for Deerland/ADM Renovations • City of Bryan Signature Park Pamela da Graca,AIA • TAMU West Campus Disability Testing Center • SHSU Conceptual Design for Presidential Library • • Varisco Spirits/Hush&Whisper Addition • Brazos County Extension Office • City of College Station Independence Park • Lease Space for Fitch Plaza • City of College Station Summit Crossing Park ��• ! — f a� I \... • r - — ~` ".' 'A rva-i'.'m`s�Jf't�{a. �'f�t'�iF :� 0.L r�'- r_ , .�1` ,tit 11 ! z �, I tr 1 J I � Jam , ' ``IIll 6.7" ',� J �mps fir' ' .--c ( — �: — —- .. 1 sal ..f t �— �,,,� I ll yt� s ; teI`` •�I r ID e) rJ I� 1. ,,' I III �, + .1, ( .. t 11 T / jI , • 1 / 1 4;', z - D10 � 1 ;samid G j7 • - 4 �' r�� �, tif_ --"\'V :=2' .*'4:',•:' ',.t.1-,--• 11.-7' '''''''._.---- 4*4 ':/ite 2 ' :i. - --.., -lilt `•, �...._ i�� _ �. f q i 0. _ �C '^_.tea:],^�Ti \_ c , r`j^. ate: �. j --,, _ 9 d ,. I 1 II .. a• r, y� ter: ,_ :. ;' 4 flil!ii�r� imillNlnttilli:a\\ ,\.i ,: Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 20 I-• ' ice\ SECTION 0 PART 3- EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL '.._ 'FArkitex ,--) Sp Cl0 .. -, 3c.List and describe work completed for public entities(schools,cities,counties,or state)in the last five(5)years Arkitex Studio's Completed work For Public Entities 2020- 2024 Below is a comprehensive list of the projects completed by Arkitex Studio for public entities for the last 5 years (2020,2021,2022,2023 &2024) rm 2020-2024 • TAMU Construction Science Field Lab at RELLIS • TAMU NCTM Lab Renovations • Feasibility Study for Brazos County • TAMUC Agricultural Multipurpose Education& ,�., • Brazos County Precinct 4 Fire Station Training Center • City of College Station Cemetery Shop • TAMU Mechanical Engineering Office Building • City of College Station Facility Maintenance Renovations %-•, Building • TAMU Heep Lab Renovation '� • City of College Station Lick Creek Park Bird • TAMU Langford Maker Space Viewing Blinds • TAMU Central Texas Warrior Hall Remodel • City of College Station Veterans Memorial Master • TAMU Tarleton State Autry Building Restroom Plan Upgrades • City of Bryan Legends Boat House • TAMU Borlaug Center for Southern Crop 1-`,, • City of College Station Central Park Operations Improvements Greenhouses Renovation :-h Building • TAMU New Building for ENRTA _- • City of College Station Carter Creek Wastewater • TEEX Training Props Facility at RELLIS Treatment Plan Office Remodel • TEES National Hypersonic Wind Tunnel • City of Bryan Signature Park • TAMU TVMDL Pathological Waste Incinerator ' • City of College Station Summit Crossing Park • TAMU Reed McDonald Renovation to Suite#302 �, • City of College Station Utilities Operations • TAMU West Campus DisabilityTesting Center �_ Expansion ' • City of College Station Independence Park • SHSU Presidential Walk • BTU Lake Bryan Restrooms (2020) • SHSU Conceptual Design for Presidential Library • BTU Lake Bryan Master Plan Addition • BTU Lake Bryan Restrooms (2024) • SHSU ML Houston Accessibility Upgrades •—, • BTU Facility Assessment of Old Armory • SHSU Administration Building VP Suites • SHSU Renovations to 1336 Windsor Drive ' • TAMU AgriLife Phenotyping Greenhouse • SHSU Renovations to Belvin Hall •") • TAMU Secure America • TAMU D.L.Houston Auditorium Upgrades • Blinn College Access Control at College Park Apts '.) • TAMU TurbomachineryAddition • Blinn College Bryan Campus Interior Renovations (-- • TAMUS Energy Systems Lab at RELLIS (multiple phases) • TAMU LASR Addition • Blinn College District Wide Fire Alarm Assessment • TAMU Heep Window Replacement • Blinn College Brenham Residence Hall Fire Alarm • TAMU Vivarium III Upgrades • TAMU CVMBS Animal Housing Facility • Blinn College Renovation for New Esports Arena • TAMU CVMBS Equine Therapy Facility • Blinn College Bryan Campus Fire Alarm Upgrades :--,_ • TEES Detonation Research Facility at RELLIS '• Blinn College Old Main Renovations • TAMU Aggie Park Garage(cancelled) • Blinn College Repairs to Bldgs D&G,Bryan • TAMU CUP Door Campus ^; • TAMU Reed McDonald Suite 201 Renovation • Blinn College Administration Bldg Stair Reglazing ' • TAMU Coke Building Renovation • Blinn College BCPA Phase 1 Roof Replacement • TAMU HFS Classrooms • Blinn College Old Main Tile Roof and Façade • TAMU Lease Space atVarisco Repairs ,.� • TAMU HFS Classrooms • Blinn College Academic Building Renovations • TAMU KAMU Technical Operations Building • Blinn College Interior Finishes for Buildings C&H • TAMU W.P.Luse Foundation/Stevenson • Blinn College BCPA Phase 3 Roof Replacement Companion Animal Center Addition • Blinn College Interior Finishes for Buildings F&H •n Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 _ 21 .-,, C jArkitex SECTION O PART 3- EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL -\ 3d.Has your organization or any of the partners,principals,officers or personnel filed lawsuits or requested arbitration regarding construction contracts within the last five(5)years?Is any litigation • currently pending?If so,describe. No. U 3e. Has your organization or any of the partners,principals,officers or personnel been in litigation or arbitration regarding construction contracts in the last five(5)years.?Is any litigation currently pending? If so,describe. No. O 3f. What percentage of your work is from repeat clients? C 75%of the planning and design work that Arkitex Studio performs is for repeat clients.Our long-standing �, relationships with our clients and project partners are one of our biggest assets.Our client-centric culture empowers our professionals to be approachable, responsive,and transparent.When challenges arise,we 0 can easily navigate tough conversations because there is established trust in the relationship.We repeatedly • do publicly-funded work for The Texas A&M University System Universities and State Agencies,The Blinn ' College District,Sam Houston State University,Brazos County,The City of College Station,and The City of o Bryan. 11 rem ,_,_ .' BLINN TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY L f COLLEGE DISTRICT. na.. ia .- i &dJjFEJfL1114 u �• J -et�'a�N,vfys,� CITY OF BRYAN 'B�VN}�.�A�, Tnrwsa��Nc A&M vP"RO COtts r .Y 7'he GoodLfre.Teas Sryle: mil �'% aA •ZQ" �;._y GIQ m COMMERCE o Texas A&M Engineering �! AIIM�vy` o * n z e o 4 b EXTENSION SERVICE U " s<. PTA: Experiment Station .k �/$ ��ti Nine Irlai TEjgS ` \ " TEXAS A&M TExns A&M. °� ft AGRILIFE AGRILIFE. hr a*ti,. c� �.% ..,-..sl• RESEARCH EXTENSION n,,7 c- 4/174Cnzvoe Czr.SrAncau A M DRELLIS U ,._� �,, L.' Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 22 • .-.. ._,. , . TTT _________,_, ,i,_ - __ _ - -----_ _ _- _ •-- —— _ — _ - — __ --- ‘- -- - -4;44'2, 1--"i"" :140*.k. "0.., _', ..-•%45:4W.V..,..,... " srlril r., ,^ ,,,,,31,.._ .; . - _of°. 1 1 :-.•••:•.-44iX., .. ../Fir_ ........,,.....e.....„..,.. _.—.i, ... • ler.....,___ . .z..4;•• ,„.• It • ' 1 1 •;' - .1 ••i ' ', . ... ...., ..erpipze,:w77,51Q1' • '1 ' . .,t, .7......:„., ,004,„ ,.. ,e+, .--.'- , 077 . 1, \ft. /--/ ...,-• ,.PART: 'Oil .- .-,,'.-/1 , ,.f„.,,,--41p h.,. . . - - ,,,ir'' ---frESS--15- .N4'.44.`,.A ..,....• ,_ : PR eiE 'T4, A i\l' ?c..:, ME ,.'!, ',-- --...._,.; _;_...;,,Le „ ,._, ........_... ..._ '. •-• ....--•••;.. --..,..."'..„....,...,..''''''..: /- •,,,..,,,, • . , \\• , ,--. 1-,Asee.L.--.,..-....,-, - .------- • . , -- r -•'. .7, N.a, ' N •• ,,,, "-- - •.-.. /..„..‘,...2.- c-ri_.....,,,,,7.7--; ... ..- --' ,,--- - . t.',L t-,_:-;'•. .:-.71:1-- .., •-----------:-._.' ' ' ''' -•, -,,,.,...;• "1 , -1'--' 1--;.-'i.':.iisitt-:•,-- ' ._.- - , -•-.),3 ,• , ,, - , _, - 1.• .:! I;r. ..I 1 1,6'..-..-•'-.-,'-'- ..., ---2------------- ,-!&., -----:- ..s '''- • ._ '. - --'"---'` , ,. - __, .!;,1 , 1- :: i 1--,-- ''''•::-.-•-!Iti'' `•71- '-----:;,,,---- .3 .., A • , - IVO- ‘ ._ , --•---________ _ ... . , •_. - .-i" 1- 11_1,•• i':' t'7. ,------ -- ...'` 0 -.0•' i....r?' .0°.-'',,..,:\ I „--------.--,„.„-• - !.. , .:. 'k ;,,!,-;-1-,•-t ..) .,,,.I --1-1-1 '' •I-,-: ,.-,-„:" , ,,,..," .,'" , _ r .. -..4 ,--t- .:1---..--1--1- --„,....-- - ' ..- ,- 414' ..' .-•••'-''•-,';',.-- --,4 ' '. , - - '. ,,,,,,.....,-, -:_-:.-i :,:- ...!..... 1-. . '-,__. ,...:,,,-,•„„..- • -, ., _ -,, 'i..;'-''.0.•.- -t...• _ • -ri-••=r•-••r-/:-,- I- ' 1..1 `-i: .• -•' .......:-',:(:-.---;,:e.•-" .,.. ' , ,-(''' ,...- r . - ,..,'N. Li '',,[1. %': N u. 1 1-,_•„ -1-• ---..1- .-' i I-,..-, • • ---- ;.•----",„•: ---- .— ,.„-..% " • .1- ;_...- _ _, •\,„\ •. .10',-7• "..••• e 'N . "-----• ------ --- . , , . , ... -, . . 1- • ••••-, . .. • 0 I , - * - t ..,' .''.-•- ••••••• • • •A.,...•, ,..., 1.__ ••,-•-..'..__ - ---_,„,`"" • ,.,,,,--,_'•••••" , e•.• "" - - .-""a- i--:•••''''• - -- ' ,----- '-:-....-‘) - '1.:. •-: . \ if I. L"1.1-t-- •••,......• -••"' •••0-'• --.•'' .-••" " t. 4' " e 4.71:1"' . , - - . ;.`• ,I.., . L.., ,, -". \ • • -- -• • • •• ..'2•4•••:In....• . ,, - . , . " • .... iTh , • \. .40' N, ".','!, • ' . 1 -L. •,- 1 • . W,r..c,.";''''.. .` :" .r.,:"... ?Ps'.: '-,:;':',.,,r 4-,,,‘"?.l'i,F.s-', " :''' %',..*'' •:-.:.-,-..''S'",,-- • "• \ '..-'1;,'T. - N. ' :; 1 ... >rf''-' ,,_.%:.;',,--,,',P:4.1„e:4!•'7.. F•,'-'-'1'.•.64ki-..` - ---.•----•=,.-----:___-•. • ' -- • , • _, -".... .-... I' ,-, .,...,.., ,.-..- i . i.,,.,-• , .„, 0 =, -1,,.. - - • ,• ' ,.- ----. --t",-: .•,4,..;',-1/2:,-,, qr ' -':', •1,3:',1..,v.1 .- • ''•. .., --', n:•,-:-;.--,:“.1. , . : .. .9..-u..t.:% . ..... . ,_• • _ ,.. I , ...-.4.'7 ,-7..1,;:,...•,' z--,•..-k,- • , . _,, -- ----- - .-• —:-.------ ,., .;:,.L.,, _ , . .. L...•• 1 - • , ,- b•-• . • - —_ , ...... _ I . ... ... ,.• „. . . — o;--- .-.. .r•-•ii.'9,,(; - -- - ----- ._ . . " —-_, .- ..N:..:, ?--- , __ : . .•:..0 .:,i2_,..-,___,_______„___________ , _.- • ....'..t-3,:K.'ts% .. ' --- • . • •-:. ....,;etio.*:,„ *. . -;(,. - -- --r., :-,,,,...1.'ns....q%, : , — ,.-. v% •L•el,.. , _ - - I ..-.... fAff)-=$•1", Z. • .., $--: f -..: ; t-:. 1 '. ."...,'••". " ' ' .i.-.‘ '--;--':!,, ' -, T . 1' gY'..• ,...--( . .. . .. _ _ --1*.A4.''' r' "i --- r I • C'r" , I 1 --- 1 — I -.c".4,, - - 1 • i tii-f: 1- • -: •' ttc..,,''. .•`: . 1 ; - .. -' --- , 4.. k ' , I - •-• ' '. tm::-Y .' " - •..-.. t Za.'. :„\''';il . f 4,•'.., .• - e - ''' -I ••-•'''''.""; ,i'?1,1)11 lij ii ,01 '--- •- -,--,Vkl'. . ':-,, ,-v-2, ::, `.1i ..ri : ' , -,,. - • ,,L... ..C. .'..,'......._e.:t.-vt_iv4., a ' -- lit5 ''. , ,, ',.". '1.. .!:ISif;',,‘I • 1?-ft ' .- r‘ .I'1:. '.-,... •-;,1,':".•.'i ...: .-...-: L_-. .- V -- ‘-- , I • ''.1 "Hiii" , ,..." ,.thi's:t , .... ' ';'...:L:r.- '' • 1.-i --------== ' 1 -k 'S '. ' I "" 111-ilt . . , =. ,:e\f''. 11111111 ii 1 ' -1::::- i',:,.,-....,;-...„....,.',,-.,:.!:1::::::::::;- .1' ..7.il ,i, ,.- - . - . .. i•-s 1111111I 1111 1 imp .4,-.,,.- .2-...;.1,..',..s.; . tir-v. _ ..,„,, ,,, ,::,s-!Li .._. i;',t 1 •......,, 7 ...,..,,,..._.„. .__ .,,..., ,,.. , .§:.,,,,.,,,,„.,,,,....,,,..:,....„, -i,,..,32.-)1,, ---- • . .., A: . ....,, 1,,„i .4 _______. _------.--- - ,,... 1.—.4.4,....,..•••:,,.)..1,..,....._11...:.---.:.:. 1 ,-7,-,,, .,..4..„,,, ,,,e"..;:;•.,,"...:4-..,.:•,_-_ ---,II „.„,,,_2...1 -.-4,---,, -4.x.!..;,.'...1. •.2..1-'1 . ..-----=7.,..,-,-,--c.;; .n.-1.:---7.7.(..7171. _.,-•..•--•‘.iz.5.,4-7. g sz TA--,...?•%. :-..., ,.,. : `..,. i i "." -- :- - .,..,.."""r, , 7•;',"srey sil-,' - 7-- -8"• .: •= 1 , 4.,1 -;‘..,, . , -7-A--,:--...' --:-- - - -- •-- ----.4W.A;,..---, ,•1`,,ati,,-C-W4., • '.1•'' 4, ' ,ta,, :-: -,.;._-;`.',.:.1 ... ":',"--.'12:,':' ' ' ''''.f-•'..44Jart-'41. -rt,::....E...: . -.,,.. , ,.. ......, A . ' :.--1-1.-i.t.":: rr"ree--" `,..--. ...• • .. - . ." • ' , . - -- , --- - ,-.... , , . . • • .- :-:'. -",...,:•".. .•'-.;. Y. -1-' •',-. -'..-_"'..-.•-,... .-.0.r.. , ; '' '' " - ':"'s .... " " - . .• '.. -. '---.... ".; "....:,.-_'•.;'..'f". .. -r,'-''...-L 4);',2,,- .. r ", , .. ."""- ' .7.,'„ ' "-.-1_, —-- — .._ . . . . ,, , _• .. - -1'L._ _ _ _• ,• . • • \_, VI SECTION 0 PART 4- PROCESS OF PLANNING&PROJECT MANAGEMENT Arkitex o PROCESS OF PLANNING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROVEN PROCESS 4a.Describe your organization's management plan and concepts for working with the owner during design and construction. Arkitex Studio Management Plan and Concepts Our process for achieving project success is well documented,and our staff follows this proven management plan for each project.This plan includes strategies for communication,coordination,and verification %' throughout the design process. r Communication and coordination are key aspects to successful project management.We see the Owner as a key member of the team and they are kept abreast of project progress.We know that it is important for the client to have one primary contact with our firm,consistently through all project phases.Our principles L- have a hands-on approach to each project,which simplifies communication and strengthens continuity of information.Our project managers are the key point of contact for consultants,which allows for ongoing i coordination of the various disciplines of the project. Verification is a technique in our management process that follows the"measure twice,cut once"approach. • Verification applies to design decisions,technical issues,and quality assurance. Design decisions are verified with the Owner;technical decisions are verified with consultants and Iocal authorities;quality of the design documents is verified through an established in-house quality review program. i Proven Process Management Plan: 01 CONNECT&LEAD lJ 01 Connect&head ,//'��t, Acquire Information Establishing good communication early in the project is critical .,,, LeadThrony hListening U to success.We see the Owner as a key member of the team and is AssembleTeam . involved throughout the process.We establish a key point of contact, `-% as we know that it is important for the Owner to have one primary contact with our firm,consistently through all project phases. - We listen to the Owner,gather information,and lead our team of , i , 02 APPLY&SHARE • professionals to focus on the project work. Set Goals Prepare Program Design Consepts 02 Apply&Share We are committed to an in-depth and robust programming phase,which includes heavyinvolvement of the owner.Gathered • information is analyzed and usedto establish needs and goals.We 03 CREATE&SOLVE • ensure the program requirements are adhered to throughout the 5Dpeesicgdny&Develop design process.The design team begins early concepts to take us Team Co lab ra ion • into the next project stage. �. 03 Create&Solve With a good program in hand and goals set,the team develops design options.We begin to solve the problem defined in the 04 MONITOR&OBSERVE L• � earlier phases. During design,options are reviewed with the Owner, — Observe Construction then selections pursued as the design develops.Our principles 40> Evaluate Quality maintain a hands-on approach,which simplifies communication Resolve Issues and strengthens continuity of information.Our project managers ---z are the key point of contact for consultants,which allows or `� ongoing coordination of the various disciplines of the project.We have in-house design reviews to get the best solutions and hold \ ' /_ 05 FOLLOW-UP&ASSESS regular meetings with consultants for coordination.This phase _ — Assist Owner Assess success U• concludes with a set of construction documents which are the Warranty Support • basis of upcoming construction.Throughout design verification is `-% a technique in our management process that follows the"measure - I • Li twice,cut once"approach.Verification applies to design decisions, 0 Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 24 U r ;Zet" I.Yn u i ,1 .t.pt,x x tp-,4 : ;'''Yk�b a Z`E �bn- '' %:".�`'rt+ 1 ''` ,;5 a, 'aF�"�--`'"M ,' �} . ,4 ,,,. .SECTION,O PART .c PROCESS a PLAN �iNG&PROJECT -- m'= -.*, • . ,.. �,4,.. . . _. Arkitex to ,T, technical issues,and quality assurance.Design decisions are verified with consultants and local authorities; - , quality of the design documents is verified through an established in-house quality review program. 04 Monitor&Observe ,-, Comprehensive construction contact administration services are an integral aspect of our services. During this phase,we provide thorough review of submittals,visit the project site to observe,and hold regular r meetings to facilitate communication and encourage orderly progress of work. We assist in solving issues that may arise during construction.The project team maintains consistent involvement throughout the , project and will provide documentation for reference.As with earlier phases of work,we have found that .- clear,open and frequent communication between the design team,Owner,and contractor is integral to project success. --` 05 Follow-up and Assess , Arkitex remains present after construction.We assist the Owner with any concerns that may arise,including addressing warranty issues with the contractor.We also assess the success of the project and gather any "lessons learned"for future work. ✓� . -' - - } 1-. Ye r •, • r v 0 -ri '•' ts✓t'-'•",�.' /-. ri p%8 a k!>. Dt Epp rA . •ri, yry fi f' :t�(`�' j _' • f l 'l;'II, 1' Il r I 1 h u ' ' • il I r t , r , •-•1_ Y lilk k '05 i.l, ‘: :-',,: ':2 _1i I ,I ice ? ^�i` . / - --- - - L \{ a al r •$ ` t ' pi' i .. , - _ -• _ .:1 t 1 - _1_.TA,: I�j 1, ''_'-..'A.'„- ...;-_°,-1 . l� / - : ____ :: :411.110" i.......... . "-..: ' -1.- .;- ...'.. _-":.-:.... .-:- ';1 .1‘11 ''.-:--iligiG i e,„.....::.:---:_.- 6 II*A14 4 I a''':---':1 y _ -VI B.R r 1, Vw�li _ • _�I,� - -� __ tea'- ..._ _ - _ - - • _� ; ' 11 l • . ' ,�} - i- `,r'x _ \ ¢ cep '"''`. ^i Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 25 ;--, SECTION 0 PART 4- PROCESS OF PLANNING&PROJECT MANAGEMENT Arkitex SD diD Our management process and concepts for working with the Owner include the following steps at each phase of the work: PRE-DESIGN'(PD) SCHEMATI�C,DESIGN(5D)' • Hold kick-off meeting with the Owner and desiign'team Goal:maximize the opportunities of the'space; • Review and confirm the Owner s goals and space needs; accommodating different department needs . � ' Gather information needed to confirm the design direction Review the-.Owners conceptual thoughts in context . -Meet with county departments ,Create initial.plan'concept options .'. Schedule determined and key dates established • Meet with county representatives to receive feedback , ` Communicate With the Owner via meeting's;email;phone • - • ••Coordinatetearmmemberwork • ,Review-local building and planning regulations - ' - ,Prepare preliminary cost'estimates of each:option , .'° - - Determine potential alternate bid items. ,-; DESIGN DEVELOPMENT(DD) CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS(CD):., . Verify design direction,with Owner's goals 'Phase kick-off meeting with•all team members, - Develop selected plan in greater-detail ,'Review the current scope,schedule,and cost-, • - Hold phase kick=off meeting with all team members - Ongoing communication and coordination via meetings, • I Communicate concerns,confirm schedule milestones ' ernails,phone calls .Establish budget management approach. Interim deadlines(50%,75%,and 95%completion). Coordination via m. eetings,emails,'and phone calls .. ' ,•.Coordination•meetings:review issues.and details • •, Interim.phase-deadline at 50%DD., . '•'Review work and resolve conflicts- Develop updated cost estimate 100%drawing and specification set,with cost,estimate County review and;approval' • Owner review,arid approval °BIDDING CONSTRUCTION'•' • Assist the county with tie process .'- ..Hold pre-construction meeting •Field:questions from bidders Communicate contract requirements to the . Issue,answers to'questions via addenda " - ' Weekly_or bi:Monthly site meetings Apprise Owner of any;issues that could impact-cost: •. 'Review•prrogress and answer contractor questions' Certify the contractor's applications for,payment ' • Determine Substantial Completion ' - , Final Completion review - - - .• '. Meetings for.Owner training:systems,maintenance - WARRANTY PHASE Assist in communications to contractor • . ' ' Arrange a 1-year warranty walk-through - -• . - - Follow-upon.warranty item'correction '.ns LLCM —__ .y, `,f:i d ., tl ^.°I I Irhtr� •il sry J a•C Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 26 r-1 SECTION 0 PART 4- PROCESS OF PLANNING& PROJECT MANAGEMENT i '' Arkitex t1 4b.Describe your organization's methods of estimating costs. (--, Accurate Cost Estimating As the design team leader,Arkitex works with and depends on the expertise of our carefully selected ;-, consultants for continued cost estimating throughout the design and construction process.AGICM is a leading cost management firm with accredited certified estimators with extensive experience in providing (T. accurate project estimates.Arkitex and,AGjCM will work hand-in-hand throughout the project to provide accurate and up-to-date cost estimates. (--- Design Phase Strict adherence to the budget is critical to the success of any project,and Arkitex Studio commits to l • keeping Brazos County's budget as a top priority.Continual communication between Brazos County,Arkitex .- and theconsultants is imperative during this process in order to provide accurate and timely information. ( In order to maintain a project budget,we must first evaluate the proposed scope relative to the budget. n This initial analysis will help the design team and the Owner understand if the two are in-line with one -° another. Beginning in the programming review phase,we calculate expected cost on a square foot basis, fl using square foot figures from recent and current relevant projects.At this early stage,we will make Brazos ,� County aware of the anticipated project cost and work with them to evaluate the desired scope of work. If the scope of work exceeds the budget,we will work with Brazos County to either adjust the budget or ,- modify the scope.We will be working with AGICM for a detailed estimate at the programing phase,and they will update the estimate at the end of each phase.Based upon this resolution,Arkitex will proceed with the development of Schematic Design (SD).After approval of the estimated costs from Brazos County, ,�.i the Design Development(DD) phase will begin during which time costs for various building systems and interior finishes will be identified.By identifying these costs at the DD phase,the Owner can make decisions, ^, with the guidance of the design team,as to which system(s)will meet their needs,design guidelines,and budget.With these critical decisions made,the design team can move to the Construction Document(CD) phase,where they will continuously monitor the evolution of the design relative to cost impacts.If any issues develop that significantly impact the budget,the design team will notify Brazos County and provide . - recommendations to realign the project to the budget.Arkitex will work closely with the Owner throughout +,:'\ the design process to identify cost saving opportunities. If any cost challenges are identified,alternate bid items can be identified to ensure the most critical aspects of the projects are prioritized in the budget. Construction Phase Once the construction phase begins,the schedule of values will be closely reviewed,followed by the review of monthly applications for payment.Should change orders arise,Arkitex will perform our own in-house detailed cost estimate to compare against the contractor's proposed cost and will work with them to . ,, reconcile any potential differences.The budget will be reviewed and discussed on a monthly basis during .� construction meetings and any time Brazos County has a concern or question. AGICM process in providing Cost Estimating ,-. AGICM's cost estimating methods mirror those employed by bidding specialty and general contractors. 1.-., In turn,to properly evaluate a project for costs,it is imperative to understand the direct costs and implied indirect costs.AGICM accomplishes this with a collaborative,interdisciplinary understanding of how a project must be constructed,trade by trade,loosely referred to in the industry as Constructibilit Review. Constructibility is integral to our estimating process—our field operations and personnel's hands-on ' experience makes this possible.AGICM has experience with RSMeans and holds multiple on-line licenses to assist in providing our cost estimating services.The RSMeans cost books have access to standard or average pricing with specific and limited amount of location adjustment factors to be applied.Additionally, ,---, it provides us guidance on typical crew members and associated labor&equipment hours for a vast, amount of work activities.Since economic conditions are not uniform throughout any one location,AGICM takes additional steps to ensure accuracy by confirming costs with local suppliers,contractors,and trade �, organizations on current material and labor trends.Rather than rely on standard Assembly and Unit Price publications,which may not account for specific project conditions,we develop quantity take-offs and our rm own unit costs specifically for each project.AGICM's unit costs are a derivative of the estimating process ,-, rather than the estimate being a derivative of assembled unit costs.This significantly improves our ability to - accurately predict the cost of a project on bid day thus falling within the range of bidders. C Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites i RFQ No.CIP 25-529 , 27 l`` L} L; SECTION 0 PART 4- PROCESS OF PLANNING&PROJECT MANAGEMENT Arldtex U 4c.Describe your plan for assuring that the project design meets the owner's requirements. The Design Process �) The Design Process is just that:a process.At Arkitex Studio,we rely on our knowledge of the design and construction process and guide our clients through discussions,providing insights and options for them to be empowered to make decisions confidently. Working with Arkitex Studio will not be a transactional relationship.We are committed to listening to our clients and guiding them through the overall creative process.We use various techniques to listen and gather information,which ultimately influences our designs.When the experience is behind us,our clients feel represented in the design process and confident in the outcome. We realize that our clients are composed of various stakeholders and interested parties that want their u voices to be heard.Our team designs projects in an approachable manner to ensure our clients feel comfortable expressing their ideas and concerns.The result is a collaborative partnership where all the project stakeholders are part of the process and a community of confidence in the design solution.Whether that includes the local community and neighborhood groups,building committees,or simply engineering and construction partners. L, We are more than designers;we are also advisors and consultants to our clients.Having a consultative nature ensures that our team will be responsive to your project,budget,timeline and most importantly,to () any concerns you may have along the way. U The Arkitex Studio believes that as architects,we have the ability to make an impact on our communities, our industry,and even the world.We can live life a little greener by employing sustainable design principles in all we do.To us,sustainable design is more than a plaque on the wall;Its about making deliberate choices that are socially,environmentally,and economically responsible. 4d.Describe your procedures and objectives for reviewing the design and construction documents for quality control/constructibility and providing feed-back to the owner. -' Quality Control 0 At The Arkitex Studio we believe that good project management is the key to quality assurance. This must start at the very beginning of the project.The Arkitex Studio is committed to an in-depth programming phase at the beginning of the project,and making sure that the program requirements are adhered to throughout the design process. The Project Manager will monitor this throughout the course of the p ro ect. After programming,there are steps that we take on every project to control the quality and thoroughness of the design process: from initial design through documentation and construction. We provide a code - review for every project and review it with governing officials when necessary,and at each phase of the project. We have in-house design reviews to get the best solutions to the program. We also go through a quality review of the construction documents prior to issuing them for bidding,construction or permit. The in-house Principal-In-Charge of quality control will provide a quality review of the project,reviewing all of the drawings and specifications.Arkitex Studio provides comprehensive construction administration services as an integral aspect of our services.During this phase,we provide a thorough review of submittals, t-' visit the project site every other week at a minimum,and hold regular meetings at the site to facilitate t : communications and encourage orderly progress of the work.The Project Manager and Project Architect maintain consistent involvement and project responsibility during the construction phase. Photo documentation is provided for reference. We have found that clear,open and frequent communication • (between the design team,owners,and contractors) is integral to successful projects at all stages of the �-' work. The Project Manager will actively seek and implement communications efforts with all parties. 4e.Describe your firm's start up and close out procedures for this project. Start Up and Close Out `�..� Start Up - � Every project begins by meeting with Owner and User representatives to establish project scope,program, o and goals.Meeting with Owners and Users to learn each team members expectations helps the project go Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 28 SECTION 0 PART 4-PROCESS OF PLANNING&PROJECT MANAGEMENT ' r-} Arkitex 1 smoothly.Consistent communication that is also clear and timely is another key element to project success. In these initial meetings,the team will set critical dates and milestones for the project team to meet.Setting up the project and project team for success is always in the forefront of our minds. C' Close Out ' The design team continues communication and coordination throughout the construction closeout to en- (Th sure the Owner receives all the applicable operation and maintenance documents for the project.We remain - ' available to the Owner through the post-occupancy period and help facilitate a walk-through with Owner and Contractor,prior to the expiration of the one year warranty,to help identify and address any items that might come up during that first year. n Our extensive experience in new construction projects,as demonstrated in other sections of this response, will contribute to the success of this project. Listening to Client goals and needs,iterative reviews,and f; remaining involved during,as well as beyond construction,are all critical elements which contribute to the ,"Th success of complex projects. I-' 4f.Describe how you will evaluate factors pertaining to the long-term durability and life cycle cost of the project. What is the owner's involvement in this process? Long Term Durability and Life Cycle Cost We are committed to sustainability and creating spaces that are socially,environmentally,and economically responsible.We seek commissions that will challenge us to better ourselves and the build environment by �. improving the lives of the occupants.Environmentally responsible building also relies on the contractor during construction,and ultimately the facilities long-term maintenance and operations. -m Another important aspect of sustainable design is Life Cycle Costing and performing a Life Cycle Cost evaluation for each project.This evaluation allows the Owner to make design decisions informed not only by first cost,but on a holistic life cycle cost basis.While performing an LCC evaluation can slightly increase up front project costs,it can create major savings over the life of the building. Arkitex Studio uses an in-house created checklist during the design of each project to insure they are fulfilling sustainability practices and achieving the Client's goals.We have utilized the following solutions to address sustainability goals on our projects: -' r-. Building orientation study Sun study Deep overhangs to block direct sunlight Installing energy efficient windows Reusing existing building materials(when applicable) Building adjacencies Minimal disturbance to the site and surrounding trees 4g.Describe the firm's contingency plan and how you will continue this project if you sustain a lost to a key member .. without compromising project quality,schedule,or budget constraints. Contingency Plan. ' \' With multiple registered architects and experienced staff members in our office,we have the depth of staff to ensure that project quality,schedule,and budget requirements will be met even if a key team member is lost.With 2 principal architects, 1 associate principal architect, l additional architect,and 5 staff members, all with multiple years of experience,all the key positions within the architectural team have back-up.The entire Arkitex office meets every Monday to review the status of each and every project.Weekly project _ management meetings also ensure broad office knowledge of the project status.Also,all our engineering consultants have multiple staff members who all have the ability and capacity to provide the services needed. Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 29 �. '" - f • r- r r-' (-- r (- , s..: ( r ( , -, .- r r (- c- t-'" ,•''' i .• r- r . ‘' ( (- ( , ,,", , ( . ,, , . , ' k, • ' • - ' • . . , . • . . • • . : 1 I I "., :i.,7`..t,''.‘.:..-r':'.u'i'•-: -.'. . * . . 's . i".'.:.;',,,,......,..<... .. ' ,-'-,;:.•:.;...:. '''. . . ''.'- _______ :,'• •. ( _..-, ,. . • \' '.. '' ' . *.,'^'.• — ' . I .::'1'... '' l ' • , ., , . . * 2 . 1 ;• ,; 'f-5.,:f',' ',',"..'i:i..-..-: 1..• -..... I.:; i;,.;::.•.'.:. ' '"`.....V.?.‘A.'51,...,.'...i.:,..4,'• ' -' / -i,.. . t'i!-,•-,:::..;;•;•-..•.;'-;•,•..,-.'-...•.;,-;:•:.•-,/,•;-•;-,..'.., •.. i4 ' .,' ...„...... _ A W .' - i . ,...4...tili7F:Y.,...c...:. •- . -.-• . i • , ,..' • -•,k,,o,..,',',.;.i-,:, -••. • - •-...;:„•,.. ..•,.".:', '. - ,..7.-r-71L-T,1,k;1/4"0--;,A.,..•: •--;.-- ,- • , ., '44topg,,;e;,-..,....:-:•.'...-...,•••-'::'. ••-. ' . , •1 r• • , . q ••-7,:4 4,-;*••-•!„;*'" ---.- — — -C" i if,' , .. ..-;•'4•',":•",.-' ,. .. --'-••-•,--•:'',; I ' •-4A-.,,,..,,-4F.-w.,:".;.-;9".-:.„. --•,. -„,-„,y• ,- ., -:, ,41.trA". 2,-t;,,•.-:.,•:.,:.... ,-3,-..r...• • - - •-•,..•,?..,:•',...,-.,.,1•.!I, • ...-,;;;!...,..,..•',,, [ -- • _. , . , ,.",i, -.t,,k-- ,,,:-.v...-•- -•--, • • . d'-•••:;•.••#?••,-!,:.-..‘,,,•,,,F . .p,,,--4,-,,„ii.,-1•:‘,-,-,:,...v.. •. - il • .•:''-,-1.,'1?..':•7 , ."... •'_). '''..0:-fi,' .• ii '"' / . , , -•'•••., " •• .-2:.0 ' i ...r tAt›.W.f.,S;.: '... r'.... .: " • . •... . . „.•.,.. •.,..... s;4141, ,1 1 i:.1 V.Itf3.:2,-.tF:,..,`•''-'l'i',.. .— , ,ii,,,,..t ,•,,,.•,,,‘...,;;;%.,,,;• •-.:•'-'%1;4::1'?'''',;i•! ...7:,..*g.Z.:1;;4;•=•;...Z ',:;:•';:‘ ' - ;'.7.,..1:114,' -' '• ..- . ...,..t4:4",,,I.:-.:',-;:!..-t.;',".,...• .•'. .1--. t • ' '•••••'•-.:,'.1=fc,..•4 i f%k;',3J.I.,:,,*'r-',.;1?:6Z.A,,,,,--,!:,'•;.':--.. .'..n u. 11 , 1 .. .. •. .,..4..'",! , -....-..„..-1, 1 ''..:1'::A.4-t:•tii`kOr, 4'..';'.4':07.-:,;.:.;:jf;'' ..:. - * . II , _ ....._ . i . ,-,: .,• •0'..- ,i 1.4 ...•- . • -, -.. , I ?...?..k.-,,`,”,1:-4...' ' “.. "' .,...f. 4 • ' •-.."1-...4.,t'ilrt.g.'10'U4i.'.,PC"? `,'•.W._ +.* C) - . ' . 4:...Z.,..,,,,..4.it;„ ,,It `iyitti..1.41"•''. ...'V...g• 1115 7.1 : .....C.'t . 11, . . .- P i 4,1.-- ! ° *P ,i'q.r.`,.-..e4.0'."«..4".P.P1.4.)..,,,Ptii,*; ....,f, •'? . *. P -•:."*.r, .:•*'''',X' Pt.Pr'.4. .4• . ..*.• .,', ''..'',. ....il!'i.L.,1::.;'',..;a . . , t:-,,-.,,,. ,,-;,-.,t•.4,.. -.:-,-, .. -a , •1, F-7" . ' i ' . • _— ,...= -' 'II ... .• -....--.1 iw.,...,.,,,:.. . v.,.. 1 --- E- p3 i i ( . V . ., 4, , . 1 . . i I , ITI I 1 - • . __ ' ,j'.:. I .. . El . ...._ ._ . cgo 7:.--1 ", timt.,...7., . •..V. . • . _ , ,, , il • ., 1 . 1, • .. .. . . -.-. .. • NVTI-.,.„.M1 .,...,lfgir,... ... :, . ,: . 1• , : -•'-s,_,-......,.... .-.-,..:.,,,. ,. -,, ..,...,.-.-:-:.,,,i.,....,3-tf,„,-,..„,,,,T,...,.4-i„., , ''•-•:,.. ,..-2', i ... k ..., C r....71 ' 1 -.,i•K..,..-.....,-4—,-;.f.,*. ..'.•*.--, — ,_•, , I -41%:4,•-• 1, _____ -•.. '','`./';''''' • 4''','.,..; '' ',., '.''''':•4''' I 1 . I I' I 41:0 . -.°,-- .1:'4. •,..i „_—e. 1, ..„ , . ...,,_. .::::: :.„....,:.1,....,.. ,,..w,,...7.1 1-..•;?--, ..4.1_ ''' ' is, ••- .....i...-•-•1' s' . I ! La ,..„- 1: 1 • .....„ _....„._ • ,,,,,A -, :,••: ..- '-. .i,,,,,,,i .•:.o ?.._• :,!y' .; ,i,„..;.: ...„.• ,.. -44., -,,,,-,), ,..,,,,,,„-. • .. . , ..., ,, I.?„ ,..mz • , ,••. 0; 1, . . ....--„-$?,;..s,..•,„!.•,4a1.'..,.,.4i.i„.,,',/z.-,Z.‘.3.,„., ,1,.','':. - :-__.•.,•',„,,.,"., .•,t.,'.i•.., ,.. c9,71! i . -,',•.'.':*--'.'..'";.'F:',..,'ti t`,1:. k i' .,.._'f.', ,„- I-,.:•.`-y%',.'4'-),.,1„,.'1,,•1-.,,:-..Z—)....,-r1..,.,.,,..'rFt,'.,-N,--,.,.:...,k-.i4.'-r.-i'...4,-••.'''.'.'.':it?'.s,','',''7.'.-.:'.•••„,,%;.'.,,...:.-•-!.,'-,:'..;,•,.•„:•: 1 4 . A -,;:',','...;,..;-,','.7;.•'...5t.i,.V..,.':".,'••ij2I.6.k,„:''S,-t *, • ,:..:: •:• 1,,. 1 3' •, 'I, ii,,.,' i,!1.i'P• 4:.-„. ri..-...••••-•P.‘ ....`.4..f.'1 .1 ,. --:...--.-i,-4 !;t1,1,-.1:',"'...-z,.....f.::.sz-..... • , .....1.'. ' SECTION 0 PART 5-PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS Arkitex urm U FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS ARKITEX PROPOSED CONSULTANTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5a.Identify,by name,the specific major consultant firms and name the personnel who will be engaging in the county's project(MEP Engineer,Structural Engineer,etc.).Prior to contracting with a firm,Brazos County reserves U the right to interview any of the projected personnel assigned to the work.Include all educational background, licenses held,and their status. �-' AND 5c.How many projects are the personnel working on that are committed to this project,if awarded? (_.) Proposed Consultant Firms (5a) &Project Load (5c) DUDLEY-Structural C, Drew Dudley,PE Rick Robertson,PE Caleb Ray,PE • U Taylor Stinson,PE In any given week,an engineer may be actively working on 5-10 projects in various phases between • schematic design through construction administration.These projects vary in size and complexity. U CLEARY ZIMMERMAN-Mechanical,Electrical,Plumbing Engineering Zac Stevenson,PE-5 Projects O Michael Daniel,PhD,PE-4 Projects Hunter Riddick,PE-4 Projects AGICM-Cost Estimating Ui Lorenzo Martinez—4 Projects Kimley-Horn-Civil Engineering Annie Briscoe, PE-3 projects ' DataCom Design Group-Data,IT,AV,Security �i Dan Walker- 15 Projects currently in design,and 20 projects currently in CA - ' Personnel Qualifications Resumes for each proposed individual are located after section 5d along with similar project examples. .) 5b.The firm shall not reassign the project personnel without prior approval of the owner. OF Arkitex and it's proposed sub-consultants will not reassign their proposed project personnel without prior approval from Brazos County.All proposed personnel will remain committed to project should the project O be awarded to our Team. U C C Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.ClP 25-529 , ,i 31 SECTION 0 PART 5-PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS / 1 Arkitex 5d.List five(5)similar new construction projects that have been designed and completed by the proposed consultant firm personnel who will be engaged on Brazos County's project.For each project,provide the name, type,and scope of project,location(city/state),anticipated completion date,actual completion time,number and amount of change orders,names,phone numbers,and email address of the owner.*(Resumes and Project Sheets • follow the firm descriptions). Kimley-Horn Engineers-Civil Engineering Founded in 1967,Kimley-Horn is a full-service,employee-owned,multidisciplinary consulting firm offering a broad range of engineering,planning,landscape architecture,parking consulting,and environmental services to private and public clients.Over the years,they have grown from a small group of engineers and planners to one of the nation's most respected consulting engineering firms—and a recognized leader in development services.Today,Kimley-Horn has 8,300+employees in 135 offices across the United States, including one in College Station,offering a full range of consulting services to local,regional,national,and r� international clients. Kimley-Horn- Extensive Municipal Experience Kimley-Horn prides itself on being a successful consultant for our local government clients.In fact,one of their largest practices is in the municipal arena.They have served cities and counties for many years and are currently serving numerous cities and counties throughout Texas.They consider themselves to be an exten • - sion of a city's staff and are committed to the success of these projects as they have many staff who live in ' municipalities for which they work.They are accessible for staff meetings and work sessions on short notice, and they can offer knowledge of local conditions because they are a local team.Additionally,many of they staff members are former municipal engineers and planners.Their team's combined municipal experience ;l in design,administration,and construction phase services gives them the specific understanding of work- ing with public works,redevelopment agencies,and other regulatory agencies,elected officials,various stakeholders,and the local community to negotiate support and buy-in,and effectively achieve your project objectives. DUDLEY-Structural and GeoTechnical Engineering DUDLEY was established in 2017 as a structural engineering firm by Drew Dudley,PE,SE out of his home - in Montgomery,Texas.As his team and client base grew,it became clear that he should return to his roots in the Brazos Valley to continue to expand the business. In early 2020,Rick Robertson's team joined Dudley Engineering,LLC to form Dudley Dunham Engineering.Rick Robertson began his own practice over 30 f years ago and has been practicing throughout the state ever since.In 2020,Anna Dudley,PE joined the firm with the focus of streamliningoperations in anticipation of continued growth and expansion.in 2021,the - firm added geotechnical and environmentalengineering to their service lines with the addition of G.Taylor Stinson,PE and simultaneously rebranded from DudleyDunham to DUDLEY.DUDLEY is a WBE and HUB Certified Firm composed of engineers with highly divrse technical backgrounds who have gathered locally .' thanks to their strong ties to the Brazos Valley. NOTE:DUDLEY currently holds a contract with Brazos County for geotechnical and CMT services as of May 2022. ' Cleary Zimmerman Engineers-MEP Engineering Cleary Zimmermann Engineers is a consulting engineering firm specializing in Building MEP,Industrial MEP,Water/Wastewater,and Commissioning services.Since 2006,they have been a high-touch,creative engineering partner for clients with complex building projects in a variety of market sectors.Cleary Zimmermann has offices in San Antonio,Bryan/College Station,Houston,and Austin and a Mentor/Protege agreement withTexas HUB firm Moose Engineers. The proposed personel for this project includes Zac Stevenson,PE,for mechanical engineering design and Michael Daniels,PhD,PE for electrical engineering desig portfolio Both Zac and Michael have an extensive of projects of a similar size and scope. ''', Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 ;m 32 • SECTION 0 PART 5-PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS Arkitex a,.,, AGICM-Cost Estimating AGFCM is a leading project and cost management consultancy firm operating since 1996.A firm based in Corpus Christi,Texas,AGICM has over 680 years of combined experience in program/project management, estimating,scheduling,constructibility review and value engineering.They deliver successful projects . through effective leadership and personnel expertise,providing our clients a well-rounded perspective • of their project that identifies potential issues and possible solutions early-on.Their core strength is knowledgeable staff,being a blended group of professionals who have experience as owner representatives, contractors,estimators,inspectors,architects and engineers.A large portion of AGICM's annual revenues come from the highly effective pre-construction services it offers in the areas of cost estimating,scheduling, constructability review and value engineering. Estimating and scheduling expertise ranges from early budgeting/programming stages through various design milestones and into construction close-out.AGICM has assembled highly skilled professionals,including registered architects,registered engineers,seasoned construction superintendents and estimators. DataCom Design Group-IT/AV/Data/Security : DataCom,founded in 1999,specializes in innovative planning and system design for technology-rich , learning environments for higher education institutions.The company is committed to providing superior services in Information Technology,Electronic Security,AudioVisual,Acoustics,and related disciplines, utilizing a fully integrated project approach.Their technology solutions are characterized by the efficient use of space and resources as well as scalability for organizational growth and flexibility to adapt to emerging technologies over the life of the building.Their custom designs allow organizations to integrate complex systems into dynamic environments,for smooth operation and a resultant return on investment. Working closely with the A/E design teams,DataCom Design Group emphasizes collaboration between the architectural and engineering engagements and brings vision,enthusiasm,and professionalism to every •ro'ect. _ •- y{•,r'''r,'J.�i -`• 'f' t.K�-�.fii"^< i-'-4+ .1':. C'-?.- 0_''''.• , " -:!v:.'7. rye.r,.. •Q. Ili'!"••fir. r .. ¢ r. '�' i t i' r +.f ''", .' , �}.!' v. t" , + ''.W... .~ " . -, HK 1i~'L}6 ,. !� �I "Y ^i•- �,4 • '. J • • ''��L•J!• . 1' e a 7 .a.� v, . c • '7 , �• n z 1f.(�.4•ti T.. °,'.'7 y ' , �rri.. a s.� 7. "1,,..' l,IT( yp1j. •`< ,�C� - ~$t_' ° ,... Y.a •/ I. e-.' I 4 lic6, ';> 'x ;• �;+ i," er 'l ....'. \'' '''''- r il i. �!7 ti Hy!1 . ,P_ti i i•a �, a5� • �A' •..' 1410,1'� Ya1r� "`\ . .jr�c: Xl Y�• - 1,•ej r ►fit gip +. Q �. ! Y •••• .y 11 `: y °,, y ,t�';r �z '= 3,'0•riv,'�� ~ "� tl -''. ;y,c�'s !, `' yiI'�� �_ Pit ,1 r ``.5�;'`r ail y . - .. '''����jjj `r1,•3' 1 '4. 2� 1 ., 4'' _fir' , 7 �' .�j1,•+ .y,,%, , t=k1itC'1 5; coo, }-,, 72� ;D "F� ,' . „ .,' • :h't; f..9, ligi ' '' - f‘ :4-...-A., ' ,- -1 • "6.,4;-,, 'fi.--.,,,, '....4., 'A‘..,;,k:.kt, - - —., ,r,1 ` ^•,•i' - - �:. } - ./ "K'.'T,. ® mot `?�' -- ^-t .la, .' I '• ;.� .�-,•. ._ •'- '4 _igi,, . M1', c "` _ -b - 'X VI i i •,y- w.2-- --- •' -an..v; ^icy_ 3L- Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 33 i Annie Briscoe, PE .-,‘� Civic Facilities Practice Lead and Project Manager Kimley»>Horn , (V \' ' Background: • '?'-", Annie is our Civic Facilities Practice Lead at Kimley-Horn,where she plays a crucial role in overseeing and managing our projects in the municipal and - - civic sector.With a career dedicated to working on various municipal projects -� throughout Texas,Annie brings a wealth of experience and expertise in designing comprehensive municipal site plans,water and sewer infrastructure, detention,and drainage plans.Her passion lies in witnessing the evolution of projects from their inception to completion,actively engaging in construction phase services to ensure their successful implementation. Having successfully Experience: contributed to more than 50 municipal-related projects across the state,Annie is '-' 6 years of experience an invaluable asset to our team,consistently delivering exceptional results and further solidifying our reputation as industry leaders in civic facilities design and Education: planning. - Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering,Texas A&M Project Experience , University Registration: • Texas A&M University Polo Road Garage,College Station,TX Texas PE No. 144104 • Texas A&M University Garage Repairs,College Station,TX current/not expired • City of College Station Police Department,College Station,TX Location: • City of College Station Facilities Maintenance Building,College Station,TX :;:; Bryan&Fort Worth,TX • City of College Station Veteran's Park Masterplan,College Station,TX • City of College Station Memorial Cemetery Maintenance Building,College Station,TX - • City of College Station 1207 Building,College Station,TX \- • City of College Station City Hall,College Station,TX • City of College Station Bee Creek Restroom Improvements,College Station, TX '~ • City of College Station Central Park Restroom and Pavilion Improvements, , College Station,TX • City of College Station Central Park Paving Renovation,College Station,TX • City of College Station Fire Station 7,College Station,TX • City of College Station Central Parks Ops Building,College Station,TX • City of College Station Rock Prairie Road Reconstruction,College Station,TX • City of College Station Rec Center Feasibility,College Station,TX • CSU Operations Facility,College Station,TX • City of Bryan 29th Street Signals,Bryan,TX • First Baptist Church,Bryan,TX ; • Twelve Oaks Reserve,Bryan,TX Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 34 ;,, SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS Kimley>>>Horn I ,T Tpe: '--`' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CENTRAL PARK New Construction OPERATIONS CENTER COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS Final Construction . � Cost: `-t KIMLEY-HORN,ARKITEX STUDIO,CLEARY ZIMMERMANN, DUDLEY, $3,673,5.00 GMP &AGICM Project in-progress Size: ,-, Mr" z 11,500+5,000 SF t , Project Completion `, , Anticipated/Actual: July 2025/In-Progress r-r .v..- Number&Amount of Change Orders: `.1 ,l a 'i �' 0 to date(project in- ,L._ j .f, � progress) � '°� -' I ! Services Provided: � 7 yy..n � - I u :<.n{�r.. > Y � �s , . ,, L� --_ Civil Engineering f Firms from Proposed `J ;1 ;, ' , s . P-7- Project Team: ti ;- �- ; Arktiex Studio, DUDLEY, } `i � 4 °7'41. ,, ` Cleary Zimmermann, - rug.:' AGICM ,. ":4 Owner: Rusty Warncke COLLEGE STATION CENTRAL PARK OPERATIONS BUILDING 0 ` City of College Station max .� �,,., ,,,. I,...,,d.,,�„-, .,m.,1 _. ._ . , �a 979.764.3731 - . � ..s. _ ..: ,. .� •:;; . ._... ..•. .. . _. ...r .. __. _,,. a- .._. . . rwarncke@cstx.gov The existing operations building at the City of College Station Central Park is Contractor: '--' dilapidated,has water leaks,and is undersized for current operations.This build- Kyle Mass l ing is being replaced with new facilities.The new facilities include two buildings. Aggieland Construction One will be 11,525 square feet(SF)and will have office space for the park rangers kyle.maas@ t and the forestry department,second-floor storage space,and four drive-through aggielandconstruction. ( storage bays.The other will be 5,000 SF and will have four drive-through storage corn bays.The project includes a large lay-down area and soil storage bins. 979.393.0080 'U C ' _1 • U .,, i1 0 Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 35 SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS Kimley>>>Horn <. (') TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM TEEX RELLIS TRAINING PROPS BRYAN,TEXAS KIMLEY-HORN ENGINEERS,ARKITEX STUDIO r- Kimley-Horn was selected as the prime consultant for the TEEX RELLIS Training Type: Props in Bryan,TX.Kimley-Horn managed all subconsultants for the design of New Construction an 86-acre facility,which includes a law enforcement driving track,multiple skill pads,a simulation suburban grid,and areas for workforce training.This project Project Budget: also includes four structures:two classroom buildings,one prop house,and one Unknown truck inspection canopy.The civil engineering scope includes parking paving, roadways,drainage,grading,water,sanitary sewer,and offsite sanitary sewer Size: spray field design.This project for TEEX will serve thousands of people who take 52 Acres the many courses offered at this facility. Project Completion About the Test-Track:TEEX has a long history of delivering training in emergency Anticipated ctCo '^ vehicle driving and provides one of the most dynamic courses available.The Sp ring pate/ Actual:-Progress , L-shaped emergency vehicle driving track consists of an all-weather,rubberized surface,park-style lighting,and 11 training stations.The precision driving track Number&Amount of helps students learn to safely respond to incidents by giving them hands-on Change Orders: practice that builds confidence in their vehicle and individual performance skills in emergency driving situations.The project sits on 52 acres of concrete and In-Progress asphalt,with a skid pad measuring 200'x 350'and a 1,300 square foot classroom Services Provided: with storage. Civil Engineering Design 0 &Construction Admin. Firms from Proposed Project Team: Arkitex Studio Owner: The Texas A&M • University System ,- Ashley Valka 979.458.7062 avalka@tamus.edu r (-", r� J ram. kY 0 Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 36 ,, 0 SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS Kimley>>>Horn - CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FACILITIES New New Construction - MAINTENANCE BUILDING Project Budget: COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS GMP$1.77 Million '. KIMLEY-HORN,ARKITEX STUDIO,CLEARY ZIMMERMANN,& Final Construction ''; DUDLEY Cost: ,-- ) $1.8 Million 11�, % = ; Size'0,600 SF -W f~ — ' op- '_?.{ �t 4; n 1`;./ �r \ Project Completion .� � Pr � " .. _�E � ` 1�7C�_r °i: - L � "ti ` Q :Al �� Anticipated/Actual: - ;a• fi I l , ,_ Q �`�� l August 2021 /August 1. �� a �1I . 2021 g&.._,::.._ __7_._ _1,____._.:_...__ .eioc.:LL_..i .,„,..: im , , ., r ` r .a ►.-�=�� ,` � ri,�� ." r Number&Amount of ..';' `:, P; br -r1 1 on'.. - L rapE 19 ". Change Orders: 1 > 'L Ti ' ., I ��. } x� . I 1 CO credit of$27,913 , r A c- ,' , - - Services Provided: s� , I �„i„si _ j" --�. 1 Civil Engineering Design L q_A:.4 AYt j • ` ` •• a :; 1' &Construction Admin. .- .„., .. 'f .. . .,. ,- " .,, w —. Arkitex Team: "" Mike Record,AIA r . ,' h, .� , i . Firms from Proposed r - Project Team: Arkitex Studio,Cleary \ , �y_� Zimmermann,DUDLEY -°' y� Owner: i ` ' Jennifer Cain . - ' City of College Station 1 979.764.3795 • ' ; '� jcain@cstx.gov +` I I ii ,t, y + ,��• II rl / o i'1' i ►;; i Contractor: --- �._. ;�s s % c JaCody Construction i''`�i j,,•� 979.774.5613 Kimley-Horn was requested to provide civil engineering and design services for the facilities maintenance building on William King Cole Drive,adjacent to `` the Municipal Court Building in College Station.Kimley-Horn provided civil engineering services for the new approximately 11,000 SF facilities maintenance ti building.The site development required modifications to the existing municipal ---•; building parking lot,both public and private utilities,and storm drainage and detention.The civil construction associated with this project is complete. 0Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.ClP 25-529 ! , 37 LJ SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS Kimley>>>Horn CITY OF COLLEGE STATION POLICE DEPARTMENT COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS KIMLEY HORN - " . . .... r i .Sr' ' -4 ' 1 r. - , 1 • 1.- - 1 - - • T; -;I 1 ;-. F1/4._ 1 1.-C• .......,_. •:-., : . . .....- t..,--..„,...7—:-.-limi,-- _r_c--..4, ,ITIV MN I,,; I till ] I IfliWil ff r :cry-.` _ r , - - - -- ( a-.,..�. --- {y� r'�— �,--., --i,?-t.:c.- rl..- =-""S"�1.t�Zi"n.. 'A 7�.: 1 T,..�i�''4-yam , u z . l4 0• - -. it \, -.-� 1_� �", -' Photo Credit:https://www.cstx.gov Kimley-Horn provided civil engineering and landscape architecture services for the new approximately 63,000 SF police station and approximately 11,000 SF SWAT Annex building. Development of the site required extensive grading and fill to eliminate a previously constructed borrow pit on the site.Site utilities, including water,sanitary,and storm drainage,were designed for the site.Improvements to the adjacent roadways,including sidewalk improvements and a left turn lane access into the site,were provided. Kimley-Horn provided construction phase services,including regular project visits,issuing addenda,and responding to requests for information. Type: Project Completion Owner: New Construction Anticipated/Actual: Jennifer Cain Spring 2019/Spring City of College Station Project Budget: 2019 979.764.3795 Approx:$33 Million jcain@cstx.gov Number&Amount of Final Construction Change Orders: Contractor: Cost: N/A Vaughn Construction Unkown to Civil Engineer Judd Blume Services Provided: .979.260.7600 . Size: Civil Engineering jblume@ 63,000 SF Police Station vaughnconstruction.com 11,000 SWAT Annex , • • Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 ' ' , 38 SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS Kimley>>>Horn -% TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY POLO GARAGE o COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS KIMLEY-HORN ENGINEERS �p �; �'• u a..yt _::, `Nh,.' �. s °� tk t �� `x *� . . . , p�,'' Type: r � f ��1 "� ��., ��x r "' New Construction P lf, 7. �i� r e �'i"' -�.ems y. s $� R c 1 r ,4- '-v2 >' • Final Construction ,«�. � u , _ w - . Cost: $58 Million •1 r •l. ,..!' — t��-•ti: Sizem -- y 1,680 Spaces,4 Ivls,9 �`-":. y K.1� acre site. Laid � �� ,,,Ax4 Project Completion Anticipated/Actual: 2020 05, , � 40, a • ; - Change Orders: Owner: • s A&M Univers y , ,- The Texas it ��. r System I Peter Lange _ • • i'1;`.4WD Y y plange@tamu.edu 1979.458.0287 `-•` The Polo Garage is a 1,680 space,four level parking garage with attached r`• dining,sports recreation,and offices.This garage is located on an existing surface parking facility and serves the growing engineering school.Kimley-Horn provided parking garage layout and traffic impact analysis support to the design team.In addition,Kim ley-Horn performed the civil engineering design for the demotion of the existing surface parking area,a new storm drainage,water and (`) sanitary sewer utilities,and grading and paving for the approximate 9-acre site. �.J • / I `, I 1 C l_.) r--•I K J Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 - y 39 (-) Zac Stevenson, P.E. — CLEARY -- Principal-In-Charge .� ZIMMERMANN �� Building MEP & Lead Mechanical Engineer ENGINEERS 1 L. i 1• Background: �' Zac Stevenson,PE,Mechanical Engineer,is a skilled communicator who can i: ''' ,--, easily convey the purpose and process of complex mechanical systems,allowing \. him to work seamlessly with owners,architects,and other consultants.He is -m as deliberate with his designs as he is with his words,putting the utmost care - into each project.Zac has completed projects across the nonprofit,K-12,higher '1 education,healthcare,and corporate sectors. ,m Experience: FEATURE PROJECTS -- 8 years of experience 8 years of experience Bexar County Public Works Building San Antonio,TX 'f with C/Z Provided mechanical design for the 35,000 SF public works facility for the l Education: County.The facility has both open and private office space,a large board room, -� Bachelor of Science, and break room,as well as staff showers and lockers,truck wash,and ample Mechanical Engineering parking. -Texas A&M University 35,000 SF I$19,403,861 ' m Registration: Texas P.E.No. 141032 Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union Administrative Service current/not expired Center Ili Live Oak,TX Provide mechanical design services for the Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union (RBFCU) Administrative Service Center Building II and are !� currentlyworking on Building III,a 5-story, 180,000 SF facility with a parking garage. - 180,000 SF I $48,000,000 ADDITIONAL PROJECTS ,'� 1 • Brazos County Feasibility Study for Renovation of BISD Building,Bryan,TX • City of College Station Central Park Operations,College Station,TX • - • Bryan Texas Utilities Administration Building,Bryan,TX ' City of College Station Cemetery Maintenance Shop,College Station,TX • City of College Station Fire Station 6 Study,College Station,TX (--\, • City of College Station New Facilities Maintenance Building,College Station, TX ' ' • City of Bryan Legends Event Center,Bryan,TX `, • Bryan Texas Utilities Administration Building,Bryan,TX ,� • City of Bryan Travis Park Fields,Bryan,TX ,-,S • Municipal Operations Consulting Office Building,Cypress,TX • Capital Farm Credit Corporate Headquarters,College Station,TX • Brazos County Plumbing Control Valves,Bryan,TX 1.- • Brazos County Detention Center Showers,Bryan,TX • Brazos County Brushy Station Addition,College Station,TX ,--- • City of Bryan Phillips Event Center Renovation,Bryan,TX - . • Hospice Brazos Valley Administration Office Renovation,Bryan,TX • City of Conroe Oscar Johnson Jr.Community Center,Conroe,TX •T, • City of San Antonio Leslie Road Service Center,San Antonio,TX n fl Brazos County[Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites j RFQ No.CIP 25-529 ;1 40 (--,, /1 0 I Michael, T. Daniel, PhD, PE - CLEARY .'` I � ��� � L; � ZIMM)rRMANN Lead Electrical Engineer ENGINEERS C ,ter '. r'- ci.�. f = " `I Background: -F I Michael Daniel,PhD,PE,has more than 16 years of experience as an electrical -• ` { '' 2 engineer and is a former U.S.Navy Lieutenant.He has previously served ..'.` _. as an adjunct professor at Western New England University. His work has `; l - , \ - ; encompassed projects such as large-scale nuclear and electric power plants, �� instrumentation,control,and electrical systems.Michael is also a member of the IEEE and has authored several peer-reviewed IEEE research publications in - ; : power systems and equipment.He consistently delivers high-quality designs for clients across various market sectors,including federal,municipal,corporate, i and higher education. �• ' Experience: FEATURE PROJECTS 0 16 yrs experience <1 of experience at C/Z Bryan Texas Utilities Administration Building—Bryan,TX �• ' Provided MEP design services for a two-story,34,600 SF facility that includes Education: office spaces,meeting spaces,and support spaces for BTU administration. _ Advanced Diploma,PhD, 37,600 SF $15,000,000 Electrical Engineering, >--, Texas A&M University Master of Science, Texas A&M University System Kleburg Office Reno.-College Station,TX L� Electrical Engineering, Providing MEP design services for the TAMU Kleburg Building.The scope of this *' Northeastern University project includes offices,a breakroom,a conference room,and reception spaces. 1,400 SF I $430,000 Bachelor of Science, • ", Electrical Engineering, ADDITIONAL New England PROJECTS -' •City of Conroe Oscar Johnson Jr.Community Center Registration: •Twin CityMission New Warehouse Texas P.REE..No.139695 (`, Current/not expired •Blinn College District New Administration Building L. •City of College Station New SCADA Permanent Building •Prairie View A&M University Teaching&Academic Student Support Services -` Facility •Prairie View A&M University Central Plant Condenser Pump 3 Replacement t� �U l_ U L) • `_.a u Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 41 C.J r; ,-., Hunter Riddick, P.E. Jr CLEARY C` mol6-�r- Lead Plumbing Engineer ZIMMERMANN ;^ ENGINEERS y1 opw �,;,ti ,. .., Background: ., Hunter Riddick has seven years of experience in the design and analysis of r' ig , :w- t.,, plumbing and fire protection systems.Hunter has worked on projects for - t-'=r`�;` , P., higher education,healthcare,research,and government facilities, including { .t. . , b ,,, ',•.A , ,,•• laboratories and medical treatment facilities. He is proficient in the design of ''J`' 4 "t \ sprinkler systems,sizing pumps,dry pipe systems,and water storage for fire �- P '; �f; systems. Th . : '. \IRA l3 m $ \\\;,..\ .:.%otth 2 tart t Experience: FEATURE PROJECTS �: 9 years of experience , � 9 years with C/Z MD Anderson Cancer Center Jones Bates Freeman Anderson Demo ;'-- Education: Houston,TX Bachelor of Science, Providing plumbing design for the rerouting,decoupling,and demolishing of Mechanical Engineering, several buildings and utilities for MD Anderson.The rerouting and decoupling ` Texas A&M University services include the utility infrastructure,hazardous material abatement,and Registration: demolition services,including the Percy and Ruth Leggett Jones Research Texas P.E. No. 146664 Building,Bates-Freeman Building,Anderson Central Building,the Houston current/not expired Endowment Inc.Park,Incinerator Control Building,Contract Work Building,and Boiler Building. Various SF I $155,000,000 r, Sam Houston State University Belvin Hall Renovations r'`I Huntsville,TX Providing plumbing design services for the renovation of Belvin Hall at Sam Cs' Houston State University.The renovation includes upgrades to bathrooms and fl public spaces,the replacement of all iron piping throughout the building,reno- ,-, vations to the lobby,laundry rooms,and outdoor patio. 60,000 SF I $10,000,000 ADDITIONAL PROJECTS •Capital Farm Credit Corporate Headquarters,College Station,TX ( , •City of San Antonio Animal Care Services,San Antonio,TX •Texas A&M University Educare,San Antonio,TX r •Prairie View A&M University Boiler Additions,Prairie View,TX ; •City of Pflugerville Public Works Complex,Pflugerville,TX ,-) •College of the Mainland Corporate and Continuing Education Center(CCEC), -' Texas City,TX • •Beta Academy,Houston,TX '; !'M II n Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites i RFQ No.CIP 25-529 () 42 Y U SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS CLEARY ,� ZIMMERMANN ENGINEERS r I JP3 FEASIBILITY STUDY BRAZOS COUNTY I COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS U Cleary Zimmermann Engineers provided the Type: Project Completion assessment of the existing Justice of the Peace Study Anticipated/Actual: --' Precinct 3 building and portions of another April 25,2023 occupied county building.The assessment included the analysis and recommendations regarding Project Budget: Number&Amount of the buildings existing mechanical,electrical, Unavailable Change Orders: and plumbing systems and their conditions.The 0 ' assessment included and order of magnitude option Final Construction , of probable MEP costs and a report summarizing the Cost: Owner: r-,_ findings. Unavailable Nathan Brandt Project Architect Size: Burditt Consultants,LLC �- Unavailable (979)977-5846 (,) nbrandt@burditt.com Type: HEADQUARTERS AND SERVICE CENTER New Construction NEW BRAUNFELS,TEXAS Final Construction - Cost: l , : $3,200,000 r -, -0000.- -1 .3:4,- --;...All •- Size: v — _ �I r—� .i t.: , y.T<F s -. 28,500 SF a .fir • I, , mm � Project Completion 'U I}1 !IV I `-- _ i, 1 • Anticipated/Actual: [ : , Ili i; °`- t •- ; I , L `� Marchp21,2025/In �- !11; e ! ,:1• • •` Progress -_ �;:i 1 nit .I _ �i I ' pp „ , � �r; ' 1 -- - Number&Amount of `� t _ H' 1. �1 ' ' ,w to,L.'x,r°� ��-C�"y - , • Change Orders: rw . L�i �:��� •>�',�.I�� �®.off � � �%x���'' caner: D of 1 t1,— ®® - \.-z- Z.• F Jy ',1': Cody McBrearty U �� �� _ -�.y --= ,A,p), Senior Associate,Senior aC" + -. J 11f Project Manager U n r d ,' ,. ,. , ,� r- - Marmon Mok F+ �� 6 A , �' f - Architecture x � codym@marmonmok. \---' Cleary Zimmerrann Engineers is providing MEP design and commissioning corn C services for the New Braunfels Utilities Headquarters and Service Center.A greenfield development on an undeveloped 48-acre tract of property,the �.;' complex will include an 85,000 SF administrative office building,an emergency - . management command center,a 12,000 SF vehicle maintenance building,a `-' 10,000 SF warehouse,a 15,000 SF equipment building,and multiple parking __, areas.This project aims to reduce water and energy use through its architectural design and MEP systems including daylight harvesting and incorporating One L' Water concepts such as maximizing available water onsite including rainwater, L gray water,black water,and air conditioner condensate. U . Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 43 -J SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS jar, CLEARY , ..M, ZIMMERMANN ENGINEERS CITY HALL RESTORATION SAN ANTONIO,TEXAS . Type: . . . —,�.� , _ Renovation • " �.• :E `t k-°•, ,, j. Delivery Method: PP; J. ,_ .�+ .4 t •® , I.1014�0 Design/Build - � t--:,.�i,= i FIB{. Pk". Final Construction LQ,t ,�,a, ar % r I .,� VW' Cost: 3:�', ... ;:_�i- , �� ..1..;- '�' -fir &y'.._ .` - 06.1" , yr. - : , : • ,�a , 1 ''� �� '''r, ,� I $40,800,000 V F ,W.s 1 r yr�. 1 ,I / d.[: �. Size: r > � _ JS n ��;s:;; ly. .. S vry.! " '::� , < d 30,353 SF , ri, ,,. ,,,,„,. . , ,_., ;' e��y', •,;s� `I°7,I'"i.*;• . (.. ProjectCompletion • � v t r Anticipated/Actual: .-- mat. aa;:r,� a dre-ti -- 1L -i f r , . r 1; ,-e.' r r• "�l" 0�Win- }������} I Jan 3,2021 /Mar 12, A � I !' , , . ,!' IU d am ;. i �6lh,,,•, 1 =h, > 1 2024 - . i Ittiri il ❑1 r--- -� -= .I III i_ b-tfei ...-, *:. _ 1 . MIP;oh:,.i; : '�'� Number&Amount of - r i')„, te- ���,,.. _ 1iffii:,11�,.,I i Change Orders: , . Cleary Zimmerman Engineers provided MEP design for the major design/build Services Provided: renovation of San Antonio's historic City Hall.Constructed in 1889,the complete MEP Design , . gut of the 46,578 SF building brought City Hall into compliance with the newest ,_ building codes.The program included offices for the City of San Antonio's Owner: leadership,including the Mayor,City Manager,City Council,City Attorney, Carol Warkoczewski and their associated staff. It also included a media room,conference sapces of City Architect various sizes,a gallery,visitor screening area,breakroom/catering area,and (210) 207-8001 restrooms.This project is seeking LEED Silver Certification/ carol.warkoczewski@ sanantonio.gov • Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 44 , U; r-, v SECTION 0 PART 5-F1'RMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS 7 ZIMMECLEARYRMANN ENGINEERS r'-1 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING C SAN ANTONIO,TEXAS Type: C; -- - New Construction Delivery Method: . , • N/A C; Final Construction { Cost: . • .. NrPr. -. °..- . .; t ':y` <., s a '.t, $19,403,861 ¶ I B, r _ pl �� i ql� 0 s Size: ar . , 111ulLvfiUsaL,,,,wu,iu _ . ,q-4...-. ' '1'A'•ie ln<,'IR{ �_; 35 000 SF 1( r; „ .. , U d -�4•' ; .. 4 1, ,� , ;i,, i ,y ea f "`s� 056 l s� ' projionM1 ?¢ , ;, .,,,� ., i 1�. ,F Anticipated/Actual: Y Dec 018 r - L =- ' - y -_ Number&Amount of :_ ��, ,� .I - Change Orders: - ,' • i - -- 24 C.) , Services Provided: .� MEP design ) Owner: Situated along the Mission Reach of the San Antonio River,the new Bexar U County Public Works Building provided the Public Works Department with much Dan Curry needed space and will accommodate for future growth.The 35,000 SF facility is Facilities Management a showplace for the county and has both open and private office space,a large Department Director 0 board room,and break room,as well as staff showers and lockers,truck wash, Bexar County and ample parking. (210) 335-2613 dcurry@bexar.org U U r' �C C.J C) 0 0 0 C U U U, Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 �' 45 U SECTION O'PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED,SUBCONTRACTORS az- CLEARY �. ZIMMERMANN '- ENGINEERS HEADQUARTERS BUILDING GEORGETOWN,TEXAS Type: , , - . New Construction ` -4r ;>• Delivery Method: , i.1• 7 � , N/A � y_MW Final Construction ‘4 _ Cost: fiF q�, $28,000,000 q � . ' . � p � Q�� Size: I , ,M a.�-i ,, ,4 ! - `" 93000SF 11.E ` j' � 91 . 'qI�� _ :'z-' • /�� `� 6' I �� '.1.',' , I Project Completion �I n'1 r ' i®fi.1 p-, ,I I, 91�8Y I!.h hII t .,i. Anticipated/Actual J ; Iint��®ena �Il�l>I - ��— �oi .?o oveowaa���l� Planned: Sept 2026 glf�f _� ___ i Et!i!t Actual:In Progress - = —• ,i 1�1 !1 In!' ,� Il.i [[[ILI� C� IiVIE B7 . 1 luou IA . I • ;lpun 111 1 1 1 I l i �,,I� J���r I', �.. 1Jo__�- _ Number&Amount of l _ .i®f e�p •. Change Orders: , _. F- ,FCHITECTUR. 23 Services Provided: MEP Design Our team is providing MEP design services for the new Williamson County headquarters building.This five-story office building will accommodate multiple Owner: Williamson County entities and will include two floors of shell space.Other Arthur Mendoza areas include workspaces and public training rooms consisting of automatic fire Senior Associate • . sprinklers designed for light and ordinary hazard classifications.The building Marmon Mok has a 1200A 480/277 volt,three phase,four wire secondary service.The main Architecture distribution board feeds the exterior mechanical equipment,the 480V building (210) 223-9492 distribution system,and normal power to the emergency power system. Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites]RFQ No.ClP 25-529 46 . U ---, U' - Drew Dudley, P.E. .c � Principal-ln-Charge - Structural Engineer i - Background: L' :, Since founding the firm,Drew has expanded the team to 20 engineers. He L. r 'ic 3. ,, continues to wear many hats while running and growing the business,although -- �• ,,�,, : his most cherished role is teaching and mentoring his employees.Teaching is L% z-. , . a persistent theme in his life,as he also works as a Professor of Practice at Texas A&M University's Department of Construction Science.Drew has earned several recognitions and awards in the engineeringcommunity in the past several '. years including most recently being named the National Society of Professional i SF., e 1. k Engineers"'Young Engineer of theYear"for the State of Texas in 2020. U Experience: OSCAR JOHNSON COMMUNITY CENTER I Conroe,Texas ( - 13 yrs experience Principal in Charge for a 94,850 square foot mass timber community Education: center,including spaces for administrative offices,meeting spaces,and Bducati s Civil athletic facilities.The foundation consisted of a crawlspace foundation Engineering,Kansas formed of concrete piers and beams with hollow core planks forming the U University,eerig,Ka floor system.The super-structure consisted of a combination of steel and cp glulam beams and columns,and a CLT second floor and roof.CMU walls Masters in Structural framed the gym space and acted as lateral support in the form of shear U Engineering,Texas A&M walls for the structure. �J University,2012 FBC BRYAN ADDITION I Bryan,Texas u Registration: Principal in Charge for a 37,446 square foot addition to an existing 2-story Professional Engineer, church.The foundation consists of a structural slab on void foundation with i Texas#123798 belled piers.The super-structure consists of a composite steel floor system currenfi/not expired with open web steel joists forming the roof.Steel braced frames were used 0to support the building laterally. Location: College Station,TX BELL COUNTY KILLEEN ANNEX I Killeen,Texas `i Civil+Structural Principal in Charge for a 28,000 square foot annex including two Lip Engineer Magazine courtrooms,constable offices,and administrative offices.The structure Rising Star 2018 consisted of structural steel framing and exterior cold formed steel framed : walls with a conventional stiffened slab on grade foundation. Aggie 12 Under 12 '� Afumni Spotlight 2021 WEST BRAZOS ANIMAL CLINIC I Bryan,Texas L} QC Manager for an approximately 20,275 square foot animal clinic including administrative offices,clinic storage and kennels.The buildings L; were two stories and consisted of a pre-engineered metal building superstructure with steel joists supported by steel wide flange beams and __,! pipe columns. BTU ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS I Bryan,Texas C' QC Manager for an approximately 35,000 square foot new administration L1facility building.The structure consists of a steel roof,floor joists,and a r� two-way structural slab on voids supported by deep foundation elements. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FACILITIES MAINTENANCE BUILDING 'College U' Station,TX C This project included a metal building with masonry facade and stiffened slab- on-ground foundation.Our scope included structural design and construction L: administration.DUDLEY also engaged as the specialty structural engineer for the contractor for a self-supporting cold-formed steel framed internal �-' mezzanine. i-, �.' L PUBLICATIONS&SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS: -Universal Specifications:A Step in the Right Direction Structure Magazine,Feb. L.` 2018 L J -Woodworks Solutions Fair Speaking Engagement,March 2020 -Structural Engineering for Architectural and Construction Professionals L, Cognella Academic Publishing,2020 U' C_.)-- Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 47 ..0 ;_ -.� Rick Robertson, PE , i :" + Advising Principal ii IP `) r ,,,� , Background: r) or Rick has been practicing in Texas for over 35 years,developing strong 7relationships with architects around the state and building a portfolio of projects .,( , ' 'l, ranging from complex auto dealerships to local civic and recreational facilities. ,l �� - Sharing his wealth of knowledge with the next generation of the design - community,Rick is known as a mentor to engineers in his firm and has served as r' ,'. -- ' a Professor of Practice in Texas A&M`s Architecture Department. Experience: HEARNE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY I Hearne,Texas 35+years of experience Principal in Charge on a new public safety building serving as headquarters for the police and fire department,municipal courts,and n Education: council chambers.Structural systems include stiffened slab-on-grade Doctor of Engineering, foundation,load bearing CMU walls with steel joists for fire station facilities (-1 Texas A&M University and structural steel moment frame with open web steel joists on police , station and municipal court facilities. , Master of Engineering, fl Civil Engineering BTU ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS Bryan,Texas ` ` Principal in Charge for an approximately 3 ,000 square foot new c Bachelor of Science,Civil administration facility building.The structure consists of a steel roof,floor (-1 Engineering,Texas A&M joists,and a two-way structural slab on voids supported by deep University foundation elements. f'` Registration: BRAZOS COUNTY EXPO CENTER I Bryan,Texas fl Texas PE No.94859 Principal-in-charge on initial buildings and expansions between 2005 and r, current/not expired 2017 which included pavilions,covered arenas,warm up arenas, connecting structures,and exhibit hall.Facilities composed of metal f. Location: buildings with deep foundations. ,-� College Station,TX TDI BROOKS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS I College Station,Texas Principal in Charge for a new 35,000 square foot office and laboratory ' facility for a research and service company specializing in environmental, 'l oceanographic and geochemical projects. ( ' C fl ' fl C �', l� ;) (\ H C) (l Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 im 48 L O • [, --7- = y" Caleb Ray, PE c '";,i,,,* ,,,,, ,�, , Project Manager ,, . Y Background: -� Caleb is a hard-working engineer with a passion for learning and helping others. ; t.. 'f His work experience includes a variety of project sizes and types from mass 3,<-- .., timber recreation centers to load-bearing cold formed metal framed storage ,_. " facilities to conventional steel and concrete framing.This has given him the `. I • opportunity to gain proficiency in analysis programs such as ETABS,RISA,and {•, •_ SAFE to optimize the design of new structures and analyze the response to .. N c - modifications in existing structures.Caleb is also known to be passionate about T. 3= • implementing programming to introduce new efficiencies into aspects of drawing production. u O Experience: OSCAR JOHNSON COMMUNITY CENTER I Conroe,Texas 5 years of experience Project Engineer for a 94,850 square foot mass timber community center, �' including spaces for administrative offices,meeting spaces,and athletic facilities. Education: The foundation consisted of a crawlspace foundation formed of concrete Bachelor of Science,Civil piers and beams with hollow core planks forming the floor system.The super- ° Engineering,Texas A&M structure consisted of a combination of steel and glulam beams and columns, University and a CLT second floor and roof.CMU walls framed the gym space and acted as U lateral support in the form of shear walls for the structure. �J Registration: Texas PE No.154223 SOS MINISTRIES CLASSROOM EXPANSION I Bryan,Texas c; current/not expired Reviewer and Designer for a 12,100 square foot two-story building to be used as classrooms and meeting space.The structure consisted of a non-stiffened L. Location: non-structural slab-on-ground with belled piers,a composite steel second floor, u College Station,TX open web steel joists to frame the roof,and steelbraced frames to support the building laterally. `J CENTRAL PARK OPERATIONS BUILDING I College Station,Texas Project Manager for an 8,300 square foot and a 5,040 square foot building. , Both structures consisted of a stiffened slab-on-grade foundation with a PEMB super-structure and interior CMU and cold formed steel stud framed mezzanines. L FBC BRYAN ADDITION I Bryan,Texas C; Project Engineer for a 37,446 square foot addition to an existing 2-story church. _., The foundation consists of a structural slab on void foundation with belled piers.The super-structure consists of a composite steel floor system with open web steel joists forming the roof.Steel braced frames were used to support the `., building laterally. V U L, L U J U 0 • '. Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 L:'. 49 U M . `'` '" Taylor Stinson, PE 11/.' Principal-ln-Charge- Geotechnical rTh '`; Background: .Waal Taylor has a wealth of experience in the Brazos Valley and Central Texas region. ' Akin He has concentrated in geotechnical engineering,environmental engineering • • „ w and construction materials testing and monitoring throughout the course of his career.Taylor's highly practical approach is recognized and valued by agencies, ' design teams and contractors alike. P BRAZOS COUNTY FLEET MAINTENANCE I Bryan,TX 1E1r yrs experience Geotechnical engineer of record for an approximately 7,200 square foot 0 3 yrs with D experience maintenance facility.The building consisted of a pre-engineered,rigid steel l` frame structure with a metal roofsystem.The building serves as office space Education: and a vehicular maintenance shop.As a result of significant topography across 1'N Bachelors in Civil the site,grading was the primary design aspect for the project. (Performed at previous firm). • Engineering, Structural Focus VETERAN'S PARK PHASE 1 BUILD OUT I College Station,TX Christian Brothers !� University,2012 Directed the geotechnical engineering investigation associated with construction of three(3) new restroom facilities,two (2) synthetic turf fields, paved areas,and the installation of a concrete box culvert beneath synthetic - Master of Engineering, Civil,Geotechnical Focus fields.(performed at previous firm). University of Memphis, PUBLICATIONS: '�` 2013 Brazos County Engineering Design Guidelines,Co-Author Pavement Design,July ,--� Registration: 2019 Professional Engineer, Texas#127726 'l current/not expired ,rTh r, C (Th C fl Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 fl 50 .� Li SECTION 0 PART 5 -FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS L, .._. __. BRAZOS COUNTY AGRILIFE EXTENSION OFFICE L, BRYAN,TEXAS ;J ��'L. -e�., Type: - New Construction ,- ,- _ Delivery Method: '`�/ - '�`\: - r�:� I Design-Bid-Build NM«:1 = - '1'•- Final Construction r ,A� aoti,dA'� $2,169,339 a - . .1;' Ins®, . `��'�`- Size: `) �� ; ! , s r o ril®®.: 10,000 5E i .,,,,zDIY tp)—' ® .�'Y� -.•- f l 1 4`, . i _ - I , •: `. ,. Anticipated �• \ !ti. --�:'/ Completion: C -. i l- January 2021 "fir' _ - Project Completed: a� 4 t �-:;- 1 i August 2021 '� , -r•� !� Professional Services: � .--' d- ." f-� , Structural Design and CA -- - - Number&Amount of ' •- Change Orders: • No structural change - orders C, Owner: C` _ . , _ - -_=- Charles Wendt I , , ,1, , , i p j - L Brazos County �- +- . 979-361-4292 or 979- �� 200 S Texas Ave,Suite r � 1 -- -- :" --='_ ---- , ,— 352 V. ` r:-- � � �' �__ _,,;r - _ Byran,TX 77803 L1 :,,� •i' � 1• ,1 �� M., cwendt@brazoscountytx. u -e. '' -�! v_1•1:` ,.. of,,ror- �} t"„`~�.-"i'� +`.- < d�s`�1 , gov ;r•. •` w°v.'.F'7°" � �.;X,{�s•x 1�4. aft=tip.. �'1%`.'.'`�2-'t%'��,.•n:`� .. -.�1..",. v e This nearly 10,000 sq ft building houses offices,meeting/conference space,and storage facilities.Special considerations included the provision of a multi-use '� conference room with a teaching kitchen and future ability to subdivide the C, space when needed.Security planning allowed for portions of the facility to be accessed after hours while locking other areas and not duplicate functions which ' would be used by both.Structural engineering scope included structural design, construction administration and construction observation for foundation and superstructure. The project was substantially complete in August 2021. u V f C Brazos County l Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites 1 RFQ No.CIP 25-529 51 �3 SECTION OPART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS: BRAZOS COUNTY EXPO r, BRYAN,TEXAS ,z-_ . - 2;1 Type: ` }� - Expansion/Renovation 4 • Final Construction .r Cost: •_.. �._ - ` �� '-,-_ 'dr;- '�1; Unknown -i - t .. i' 0.'- �t ,.-, Anticipated ✓w Y\ `•• t. 1'.. e Completion: [�t� 1 , �"''- L ' • •••'r- '•�a'-13� :_�' N/A-feasibility Study ,--} M •'-' • x `y �`1 ~ ♦#" L^ a �r ti_�rL `,.. ' e ,f `C Project Completion .� ,. , . i ::i _, - -- . __'w•�,� Anticipated/Actual: ce /�� ;i=Q - ._ Unknown to Structural " ,�- ` _ Engineer/Last phase - � . x,,s= ,1 �- � "_ - ` completed in 2017 *-4:":: �- k , ,�—, ► Tr , Number&Amount of \\\\ n �.. • L �' �' r 1. t ` •3_ : Change Orders: .-s �a ,� • Unknown , f •'• ,+ Iti`' {: , rtiti Professional Services: •r`_s "��' r f - Structural Design and CA • _ -; i - "� r Owner: ;� - ,, ,,,rfi� rl artI.` ,44.1 rl ;..,, Jim Singleton,° AlA 4- "?" e ` ,�z z., J-r SZS Architecture {f- a .., - - `\,` .. 979.779.5757 • - ,,.•y '0 `. ;'.--, - (Prime Contract)for ^� 4 Brazos County(original "1 ti � .' t,� .r� ,, owner contact no longer , ) ���������1 �}15 - �)- . with agency) y�' ,. ,i, � 's9. .g � rti - - ''- i.l �: - ,. • i, fImo:; ¢ t {^,� r'_q`/' -i'l . N nx.' -c-t • Photo Credit https://www.brazoscountyexpo.com/ Structural Engineering Design and Construction Administration for various expansions of public exposition center for Brazos County. Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 52 , r� U .) SECTION 0 PART 5 -FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES ADMIN. BUILDING FP ,,__„ BRYAN,TEXAS •� ,_ - • p . _ ��J ' � �t'r u...,'ism $ s y,;. 'k , Fs �t' M ft G � m .�..c • ` ♦ `r � ..�z- i5 am 7 tw c r- s as e1 ' `� f &, A • a 8: ` da - - +7 .1 !_. 1 ,. 4,,,,:,.„, ..,._ ; ,,,_.., ......., _ .- (: -. . •' �_.. a + „nY _� �- ' 't ey 3 • -�";'"� ,£ .=.e- Pry r 6s — �� I' n r ,S i pi, e: �y ;` ; v { f "� } ` �'�M 2. s� "?0 � -- - '5.;. , oi' " YI ' -iv., T, s , rc�a�F4.1. „,:,t,y; , , - i t.. i ,7 -t a ) • r . 9l `r;,.,•i e " ,ce - } � ' , 0 � ( X .( ,( -�z _ 'i,��r �'� �7.T . �--^ _i.�ir�i d s� \ ;. �+ ►,W• , fi1.d _ _ t. Photo Credit:https://www.bryantx.gov/ Li Structural engineering design and construction administration for a new 35,000 square foot administration ( facility. u Type: Engineer/October 2024 Owner: ' New Construction David Werley `� Number&Amount of BTU Final Construction . Change Orders: 979.821.5897 U Cost: Unknown '- Unknown `-% Professional Services: U Project Completion No structural-related Anticipated/Actual: change orders �� Unknown to Structural BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES CONTROL CENTER BRYAN,TEXAS ' Structural engineering design and construction administration for a new 4,000 square foot warehouse/office building. Type: Project Completion No structural-related Owner: --; Expansion/Renovation Anticipated/Actual: change orders David Werley `) March 2025/In-Progress BTU Final Construction Professional Services: 979.821.5897 U Cost: Number&Amount of Structural Design and CA Unknown Change Orders: STANDARD SUPPLY --; WACO,TEXAS u Structural engineering design and construction administration for a new 48,000 square foot warehouse/ office building. �-' Type: Project Completion Professional Services: Owner: New Construction Anticipated/Actual: Structural Engineering Richard Doyle Warehouse/Office Unknown to Structural and Design Standard Supply .% Engineer/February 2025 214.630.7800 Size: Anticipated Number&Amount of rdoyle@ssdhvac.com `--' 48,000 SF Change Orders: C; No structural-related change orders �t — Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 53 Lorenzo Martinez, CPE AGVP of Preconstruction Gt4. Chief Estimator INC. r' Y~_� Background: Mr.Martinez has 20+years of experience in all aspects of preconstruction/cost control services.He is responsible for leading a department of highly qualified professional estimators to collaborate with project stakeholders to provide conceptual&detailed cost estimates,constructibility review,value engineering and scheduling.Since 2003,he has participated in producing estimates for ' approximately 750 projects/programs valued at$14 billion.Many projects/ programs involved governmental agencies such as the Air Force,US Army Corp of Engineers,Air National Guard,GSA,Veteran Affairs,along with many other Experience: local and state institutions such as the Texas A&M University,University of Texas, r1 21 years of experience City of San Antonio,San Antonio River Authority,San Antonio Water System, 21 years with AGICM Port of Houston and TDCJ to name a few. �~ Education: Project Experience Bachelor of Business Administration University Health Science Center,Texas A&M University,College Station,TX A&M Co Management-Texas Texas Facilities Commission,multiple locations in TX �~ A&M Corpus Christi,TX p University Boulevard Research Building, University of Texas Galveston Associate in Applied College of Natural Sciences Space Master Plan,The University of Texas,Austin,TX Science,Architectural Combined Science Facility Renovation,University of Texas San Antonio, Technology-Del Mar College Corpus Christi, UTSA Main Campus Improvements Program,University of Texas San Antonio,TX r, TX • Center for Nano and Molecular Science and Technology,The University of Texas at Austin Registration:ASPS Certified Student Health Clinic,The University of Texas at Tyler,Tyler,Texas Professional Estimator Biological Medical Engineering Building Phase I,University of Texas,Austin (CPE) No.92 20 00-788- City of College Station Central Park Operations Building,College Station,TX 0411 Brazoria County Courthouse Campus Renovation,Angleton,TX current/not expired Hood County Jail FCA and Programming,Granbury,TX fl rn r� n r, • r't Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office.Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 ;Th. 54 () -'' C; SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORSAG EN't (. , .._...- INC C' JUSTICE CENTER EXPANSION & RENOVATION 0 ANGLETON,TEXAS Type: ems ,_ , ";,. Renovation&New . I "_ ¢.. `h Construction ow_ - I an ` ,t+� iA. Delivery ry Method: I RR € r ; CMAR �i , v - y Tr- I ;; �, A ' > . : Project Budget: $170M 11' 11 a• •; • - 'r -,� I _ ' - Final Construction \_,' .i-- _ '-, • ti_.,- - ( ' ;� j ' Cost: . -};F, _}�. _ .�' -uu- ---" Size: , •-,,rt_, ,. ,,, , vrr �, - 7 �� _ Admin: 152,270SF J - w \_, _ . —�—� Justice Center: 154,8455F 1 _. - I . EOC: 15,500SF West Annex:45,000SF j The Brazoria County Justice Center Expansion and Renovation focuses on redeveloping the 9-block area surrounding the Courthouse,addressing the Project Completion immediate space challenges and setting the stage for future surrounding Anticipated/Actual: population growth and impacts on County Operations. February 2023 - • The new campus will optimize existing space,consolidate operations,and Number&Amount of develop additional areas.Additionally,the changes will allow for more efficient Change Orders: 0 arrival,parking,mobility,and security checkpoints while mitigating existing unknown and anticipated space pressures on the public,Sheriff's office,and operational -,' departments. Services Provided: C,...).— -Cost Estimating The Justice Center will encompass renovations to the Historic Courthouse as -Project Management LI well as renovations to the existing Courthouse Expansion.A new 6-floor, 152,000 -Construction SF Administration Building will become the primary entrance point for all non- Management ' --' employee visitors to the campus.The existing West Annex building will be -Quality Assurance u renovated to convieniently house the County Development Group consisting -Inspections of Engineering,Flood Plain Administration,Permitting,Environmental Health, u Groundwater District,Fire Marshal,and Emergency Management. Owner: Matt Hanks,JD,PE u County Engineer '� Relevancy to this Project: matth@brazoria-county. o -Courthouse Expansion (979) 864-1265 -Courtroom Renovation , -County Facility L -Addresses needs from rapid population growth J C C CI ,, Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 55 (_' SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS AG cJ\ij. ,Th INC. 4 � KENDALL COUNTY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES BOERNE,TEXAS 11: w s'y� T Type: sµ � ti> New Construction } � �` • "a Final Construction `�\ .ir ;�,� � • Jail Expansion:$7.4M : \�`®`�,- ,, � a — - • EMSStation#3:$3.5M �, ,. ,� Jail Expansion:6,685 SFII1i,:._ _mil � � ,? r��,..��... -,r r. �- -_.- ,...w.._ �; ; :y-;��,- �l EMS Station#3:6,000 SF _ • jai -i"L'.'. �•' Y:ti;.j r:as - -:r 1�._� Q f 4 �, sl Project Completion • z i �;: �fi' , 4 r �.,r "- Anticipated I Actual: -•=..1, er •as: s s ,��,.. �j,r i�_.-K C iti\s � y`� I;�II°�r' April 2024 • ProfessionalServices: �� a ,gggia / ,:� �! _ -Project Management • --°-- -Cost Estimating - AGICM is providing owner's representative services for Kendall County including -Procurement and project management,procurement and contract administration,and cost Contract estimating. Administration AGICM will perform as Owner's Representative for the Jail Expansion and EMS Number&Amount of Station No.3.The Jail Expansion will expand the capacity of the county jail by 40 Change Orders: inmates including a medical space.AGICM will perform Solicitation Assistance unknown and Owner's Representation for the new EMS Station No.3 which will be capable of sleeping six, plus three vehicle bays and will include potential future Owner: expansion for Sheriffs facilities.Additionally,AGICM helped draft a template Kendall County Master Agreement with specific trade services for Surveyors,Geotechnical RickTobolka - Engineering,Material Testing,and Professional Engineering. County Engineer '1 • r (�• %1 IT) C) Brazos County Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CUP 25-529 56 �� 0 U - C SECTION 0 PART 3-EXPERIENCE OF FIRM'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL /�G Elvt. �■� 0 �: OSCAR JOHNSON COMMUNITY CENTER CONROE,TEXAS Type: . - � �� _- - ----- — - .. _ = T; -- id New Construction •`i __-_�- - - _, I. Delivery Method: • : �. ' =z . s - - .a - �,1-Ii1 Final Construction / ' ,,- zy `' ., _ � 1-<=1 Cost: ‹;:; o o Jr!' $35M -, ���y"`� -;:r;, a z;., ��:. -� Size: `� � I, `. 87,000 SF 1 ;�` - - Project Completion .-_, `-1 ``t- _--1``, '`• I. - ' . Anticipated/Actual: r In Progress ', AGICM is providing cost estimating for the 87,000 SF Oscar Johnson Community Number Amount of ,' Center for the City of Conroe,tasked with completing detailed estimates at Change Orders: 100%schematic'design,100%design development,and 100%construction unknown "---) documents. Services Provided: ) The public community center will house afterschool care,administrative offices, -Cost Estimating classrooms,and a recreation center that includes indoor basketball/volleyball -Constructability Review , courts,indoor track,weight/fitness room,and a gym.The community centert Owner: Ugrounds will features 1,800 SF covered pavillion,playground,picnic structures, • O trail system,detention pond,and parking. City of Conroe 300 West Davis St,St 200 0 Conroe,TX 77301 (936)522-3000 C 0 `_, 0 r-' C U U U Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 U 57 L� SECTION 0 PART 3 - EXPERIENCE..OF FIRM'S'PROPOSED PERSONNELAG GNit INC. PFLUGERVILLE DOWNTOWN EAST PFLUGERVILLE,TEXAS -. :tip; j,.';; ;.,dfi b,r Type: New Construction i - am, ,� ��. Delivery Method: i ,,.I P3 i � _ r- � :, a = ,, s�z Project Budget: MINA I — i T---' G _-'. y�IilA ® ., ` •` . - _ Final Construction ,_ ;rIf Piiii ��I; . ;,;ti ,f„4; a , --- Cost: i ®® ir:. % . �. F�,.:51 �_ -,,., 7 -1,` Size: ,.- ,J `.1 r - i , f 14011VI1' _ " Ell - r ii.c 35,000 SF ,L �r a _tom' �- „' � - Project Completion' r T� a >1 s y , ,.� 1 Anticipated/Actual. `y � I n l � `yk = In Progress � ' _ ` Number&Amount of ._ `. , 4 ., ?.._ - • Change Orders: :- _��^�.. unknown AGICM was selected to provide Owners Representative Services for the City of Services Provided: Pflugerville for Downtown East development. -Program Management -Cost Estimating The Downtown East development consists of the 93,000 SF City Hall,the 120,000 SF recreation center,and up to 130,000 SF of retail, 120,000 SF of commercial, Owner: a 75,000 SF hotel,and 500 multifamily residential units.AGICM's efforts under City of Pflugerville this task order have included meeting with stakeholders,public outreach,staff Emily Baron feedback,demographic review,and reviewing growth projections to determine Assistant City Manager " what the needs of the facility will be to ensure it serve the desired functions (512) 990-6300 of the City for the next 20-30 Years.Once the Programming was completed, emilyb@pflugervilletx. we worked with our Preconstruction Team to provide a detailed cost estimate gov on the future facility to ensure that funding is adequate and future escalation is considered in this very volatile construction market.Currently,the City is conducting funding options on the future 93,000 SF,3-story facility,at which . point we will move into the Design Phase. • Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 58 - \'i ;, SECTION 0 PART 3-EXPERIENCE OF FIRM.'S PROPOSED PERSONNEL AG C. /t ..� INC. cl PUBLIC SAFETY HEADQUARTERS -c VICTORIA,TEXAS • ' / u ' N "` • q \ 1� `� 1 II ' ,��,/ //, : . Type: � �� ��� \I\I I I��/' //��//,`� New Construction Delivery Method: `-.% CMAR i ,I , i ,-- ,4,. :,,,1 A , . .,. i / / Il Project Budget: 1 , s , , . th x _ --_ �' � f_`; ..! (_ ft I__ Final Construction ,-,. ] ;� F I Cost: �% 0 � PUB . SAFETYr, HEADQUA r RS O 1 uu In-progress,unknown 4 c 1;,-1- ' �c j . I'� L a cs ,;:9I , __ L Size: -_2- — -�:'�,��c a 6-di.a, T. . c _ ,i ' 4 r 70,253 SF pj, - , '- `� - -- Project Completion ? fi '-•,i; , - - Anticipated/Actual: October 2025 t=-- -1— i�, �„ ii I. -, .. Number&Amount of Change Orders: AGICM was selected to provide Owners Representative Services for the City of unknown 0 Victoria for their new Public Safety Headquarters. Services Provided: ` •._.0 AGICM is providing full project management services on the new 2-story,70,253 -Cost Estimating r-• SF Public Safety Headquarters for the City of Victoria,including cost estimating, -Project Management on-site construction management," and closeout services.The 9 acre campus will ' provide security and space for law enforcement,firefighters and municipal court Owner: workers. City of Victoria 1�J Contractor: Spawglass —, C y•- U lr _- U r ) Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites(RFQ No.OP 25-529 • 59 �_'I Dan Walker DATAC°^^ -<- ''' Division Manager I Sr.AudioVisual Consultant DESIGN GROUP (. f Background: 21 Dan Walker specializes in the design and integration of flexible and scalable '' • ' }, technology systems for municipal,government and public projects.He has r_ ' extensive experience with high-fidelity/highdefinition/high-resolution media capture and streaming,collaborative learning platforms and audio and video '�' communications.Dan has in-depth knowledge of a wide range of integrated , 'FaANN systems that incorporate IT,video,audio engineering,and satellite and . 1A communications security.He is proficient in determining specifications to ;�' su ort broadcast,podcast,multimedia and AV a lications.His ob ective,cost- r-� ffec g p pp . g rr,�:,,.r e ective designs deliver immediae hi h- erformance and allow for the reatest _r=r flexibility for future growth. Experience: City of Colleyville,Heroes Park,Colleyville,Texas 20 yrs experience $6,400,000/62,500 SF - 9 yrs with DataCom ` r ` Education: City of Round Rock,Griffith Building and Paseo,Round Rock,Texas , BS,Architectural $19,500,000/44,000 SF Engineering,California i > Polytechnic State Cityof Round Rock,Sports Center Expansion,Round Rock,Texas University-San Luis p p (_.) Obispo $13,0.00,000/30,000 SF ,-, MS,Structural City of Houston,Vinson Library Renovation,Houston,Texas _,- Engineering,University of California-Berkeley City of Victoria,DeLeon Plaza,Victoria,Texas City of Austin,City Council Chambers Renovation,Austin,Texas ,--. Dallas County,Jail Television Infrastructure Upgrades,Dallas,Texas Caldwell Registration: ,-- Texas Texas PE No. 124041 County,Judicial Center,Lockhart,Texas \- Texas Division of Emergency Management,New Headquarters,Austin,Texas •�_'), Location: Texas Division of Emergency Management,Warehouse,Bryan,TX , San Antonio,TX' ._, tJ r `I. l / ' i i r �-\ ,- , Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 '_^) 60 � DATACOM SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS DESIGN GROUP 4• Project#1 Caldwell County,Judicial Center Type:Adaptive Reuse Scope:This project is the focus of substantial commitment by the Citizens and Commissioner's Court of Caldwell County to provide for the secure and sufficient centralization of services related to the judicial system and public access to the courts and all related services.The uses included are four courtrooms for District Courts and County Courts;District Attorney offices;District Clerk Offices;County Clerk offices;Adult Probation offices and administration;and a public multi-purpose room for county gatherings.The project is • all new construction within an existing 50,000 SF shell of anold WalMart building on South Colorado Street ( in Lockhart. Location:Lockhart,Texas • Completion Date-3/2015 Change orders-Not Available Owner Reference:Mark Hinnenkamp,IT Director Phone:512-995-0519 Email:mark@co.caldwell.tx.us Project#2 Alamo Regional Security Operations Center Type:Tenant Improvement Scope:The new 20,000-SF secure facility is located in the heart of Port San Antonio's technology innovation campus and allows municipal and CPS Energy security teams to work side-byside and 24 hours a day in a state-of-the-art,integrated space.This collaborative facility will allow officials to exchange information in real-time as they jointly monitor and thwart potential cyberattacks. DataCom Design Group was selected as part of the architectural design team to provide design and con- suiting services for Information Technology(Voice,Data,Wireless),AudioVisual presentation systems and Electronic Security including access control,surveillance,intrusion detection and emergency/duress for this tenant improvement project. Location:San Antonio,Texas ' Completion Date-4/2022 Change orders-Not Available Owner Reference Sunny Khemalaap (ITSD) Phone:210-207-6000 Email:Sunny.Khemalaap@sanantonio.gov Project#3 Texas Division of Emergency Management,Warehouse Type:New - Scope:The facility includes about 60,000 square feet of warehouse space,and 5,000 square feet of office space,an emergency operations center,classrooms,conference rooms,a break room,restrooms and shower facilities.The foundation of the building will be designed to support storage racks and 18 wheel tractor-trail- ers.It is to be air conditioned throughout to preserve the PPE. In addition the building will also provide staging areas for buses and ambulances to transport citizens out of harm's way during major disasters. DataCom Design Group was selected to provide technology design and consulting including Information Technology,AudioVisual,Electronic Security and Outside Plant communications connectivity. Location:Bryan,Texas •-"-' Completion Date-7/2023 Change orders-Not Available `__' Owner Reference:Sandra Fulenwider Phone:512-424-2102 Email:Sandra.Fulenwider@tdem.texas.gov • Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 61 SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS DATA CO M .� DESIGN GROUP Project#4 City of Round Rock,Griffith Building and Paseo Type:Renovation Scope The 44,000-square-foot building,which will maintain its designation as the Griffith Building,will include the Round Rock Visitors Center and a two-story Arts and Culture gallery on the first floor,and the Round Rock Chamber on the second floor.The north side of the building will provide additional flex space -- for City operations. Location:Round Rock,Texas Completion Date-In Construction Change orders-Not Available • Owner Reference Dustin Harrison Building Construction-Project Manager • Phone:512-218-7009 Email:dharrison@roundrocktexas.gov Project#5 Texas Division of Emergency Management,New Headquarters and Parking Garage Type: New ~' Scope The new iconic,six-story state headquarters creates a highly visible Texas A&M University System presence in Travis County.At 273,000 SF,the building offers a significant amount of space to accommodate all TDEM headquarters staff as well as personnel from other emergency management partner agencies. c; Since flexibility is integral to TDEM's operations,workspaces can be reconfigured as needed,and with the quick turn-around times critical for emergency response.The centerpiece of the building is the 15,000 SF council floor.The project includes the largest SEOC in the country and a 900-space parking garage. A new 54,000 SF SEOC is hardened to sustain very high winds,and is supported by redundant and emergen- cy power,a potable water supply,and overnight accommodations.Other high-tech spaces for SEOC support functions include the state watch room,a radio room,live recording studio,a GIS workroom,and a data center. Location:Austin,Texas Completion Date-On Going Change orders-Not Available Owner Reference Pradeep Rainadoss LEED AP,PMP,CCM Texas Division of Emergency Management Phone:512-423-5432 Email:pradeep.ramadoss@tdem.texas.gov .\ { r' r" i-.' r (Th Brazos County f Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 62 /U _- SUBCONTRACTORS r� �) SECTION 0 PART 5-FIRMS PROPOSED . il . Arkitex 0 ` ' 5e.List three(3)projects that the proposing architect has worked with the proposed consultant firm.Including the `._% consultant's responsibility for the project. U Proposed Project Team Below is a matrix showing previous projects that they proposed project team has worked on together. ;U CIf riitolProject( Arkitex CSC DUDLEY Kimley-Horn AGIcM Data€om U Studio aliRTECLEEIM allEGEllefil PK7 (( D- I. - . agP ' Engineering) Estimating) Group Engineering) ` 'P i a, QItTES7O Security) Brazos County AgriLife Extension ✓ V. - V - Office V U First Baptist Bryan Addition and ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ remodels(3 projects) '�1 City of College Station Veterans V ✓ ✓ ,,_' Park . ( City of College Station ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ,J., Independence Park Texas,A&MTEES RELLIS Windtunnel ✓ ✓ , .% \ Texas A&M TEEX Training Props ✓ ✓ Phase 1 L/ Texas A&M Turbo Machinery ✓ ✓ ' ✓ Secure America ✓ ✓ ✓ City of College Station Facility . V ✓ ✓ (..,' Maintenance&Cemetery ` Maintenance(2 projects) • L) City of College Station Central Park ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ( • Ops __,' City of College Station Utilities . V ✓ ' ✓ ✓• ✓' i Operations Expansion • • ♦ Brazos County BISD Feasibility ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ U. Texas A&M Commerce Gamebird ✓ ✓ --' Research Facility • i w rn z w _ f: ) J� ti-1 _ ` ram+-' i ` 1 �. M}', ',1:';'.: -V-41-4.-- \ A Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites[RFQ No.CIP 25-529 63 ,. • .... i, • • • • , " . • . • SECTION 0 PART SIX. .._ ,._. . SCHEDULE AND BUDGET CONTROL. . jAjkOitex • . . • . ....„, • • . _ , • , • • , . •, •.• •i„.... . • • ,.. . ...„ , . ,, • -- . • •„,- , • • . . ..•• ,,,,.,-- - . , - ..- . --• - ../..-.' ,.• ,,_, ,...,,,., . . .,.. - - •,,kva.:••• ,,.,., _- , . • ...' !/. ...rt.,...-;•,•,;!,!;'''+!..b,,,... ...,!. _-•• ,- . ../ ift--- • 1r2 . et*, ,6--..-,.: ,- ..._....., \--- - -- , . —• . . -, - ---,,__ i',,-,-;,:t.: - s.. ,..,..t„.-'11 1 -*IV'.1-*1'44't--4... •/" •.$0,--- ' - -1"Nbt,. - • ---• - - I t .. " •,1._,;,-,.p, '-'"'• !--•1--#4.;_„,- 41:1A.,- '; '.f4.;1;-."11..k.N.*--.:-- - !Fr• r!.. ..1.4._,7,4•10-,-1).-e...r.'1"?‘i'". !-06; 1,?!.! "%tt- - •'' . .. •-...-e.r,-•••,:wkAzoi"fik :15.;----AV'' " --.-. -• - •., -.. '' ' i _ —cl LZ. 1 • .,1=•=7.--„•.:=::.z..t - - ! 1-,71 g,'-' '-,•&,:a...e,. 17- ,,,r--7,47-r ,w-, - :'; 1-r-- ' .--,ri. :: -' .---.1-' •,-•,-',-,4 i. 4 - ---' ,h .., -,. i .. ,- --,--;"-rptirei.-,,N,.._ 4•04.•,,.6„--:ALLT, ., ; - i I •,',7- ' • — 2abitt 2' - - •![! ! - -- 44., _Egor-,..i. ; ---,c.4 ..e'1 i . 0 L•'. 4,Zf.S1'';1,-,,..,-.6t';_-.•. , , ,...:.',--,,,,.. -i-.,•,; -,,,,...-..?....,v_.. -- •!F.." L'i; • ..= I . „ r!,,ke_?'4:14.-:1.-.•kr _.,- --i;I, ., - '• ;Cf:•-V3,07!‘ 7,4.4'` .,f,1,_-,11,i 1•...4 ,:.1,.. . i i' =''1' \,_ 3,',,,-‘fg,r. 4-1., ''',,,,,L, " .',KT.' L• ,--.'. , -•,' ,1:10.4•11-'1 'iqiI;iiw. Ji-1%.177-.17,=-..1• , : !1,,, I 11 IL. zailq I 1 ' i . 7 11•..71 • . .. ; ; ,.._ . Li t . , 41•41z,,--,,.• -...i!,--rd erzikt., 1 -• ! .11! ! ' I ,_.,..F!..-. .....-=,1 r--1 F.,,-.7..-,--.1 . -_-_,_ '•,/LW!••_A.-. _..,!';ic.'-!'.,--c. --.."., '•.- - -- .' =. !I I ,d • , ' . .= l' •;!!. . .1! •-•,-..-1i...z.- -;-___•N.'-4-="7=41: .' -••• cr..zr ..,‘,,, .-•;:,!--- i _ - ., . _ 1 ' I !-,Clar:!INUPV-.j.'1..i"--- - '-'2-..--_::_-•----4,,--..:- . ' •.- ''', . ar • --.".- '-'-..... .1,,,-7,,:i41,77-7.;7. , ... ! .--:'-fi'• L.,--...--,, 'S"-!---'-.. . :.•-• !''----7- ,_11'4 - ' - — - .•— .-— '-.•!!!!‘.:4-4,-----_.-- --- •-- ----;-!-- -• -,-=--!!! ._- -.- .- - .- . .„ ..7.,,. ..- •V . •r•‘. •' - -.•_:.-. ' ::-'!•—..•--!':• -•--1,!..' - -.. ---....: '-b--1‘-f- • r -,!-Nii-- '-••-,,-- ..1.-7:;:`- -t-'.- • ---,,,, il • ,• ; , "-• - ------ lt, - . .,, _ _- . -,-;,,e` • . - - • , .. • • _..._ _ _ 4 . i . .„,. . ..%4 r•.,_ .. - ---:'N-- -• . ...._ -_ . -...,,..., -. _ .4 • .4.. .. ., __._• . . ... 4 ..,,_ .. .-4 , -.„... -r• % : 1 I'• : , "it. 1,, .,._ ..... --ti;„‘„ ,. . -- ."-k-•-,-;.: ,.. -4 ..- ' - • -1.,,• .L. , • 11 1 • ii eAs ,.,'• , .. 1. • -1 11- . .,4„ t:- ! \..•f. ..!...- _ . • !. ,11--------''!--- -."--1---- .. -... •A_ V/! ., , • . • . - . ,,.• ---`-' I. i . - '/4. . --;.-..-1 r-' t •. • ....• . .- , ,-,.• ,a'.....- • _____.__,,• 1 • 1,7'' ' -•7• .', . It :!•:,''::e(,:-.It 1.,."::: . ' • lit, / . . ' 1 ',!. '—, -,,.a..f...,47` ...- -• - ,f2,.i,,• td--,„-..i . 't . ' . .f.* „Z• ..;I fit,5, '''' .7.-4 I t m/ i • .• '••14"..",.) .'••• • 'V- ;_l , icrtiit , • .• 71. u U SECTION 0 PART 6- SCHEDULE&BUDGET CONTROL AArkitex WO t,, SCHEDULE & BUDGET CONTROL U 6a.Describe,in detail,the project scheduling system or methodology you propose to use in this project. * Project Scheduling We start our projects by creating a detailed schedule,which is based on the Owner's required completion date.Using the completion date,we work backwards,creating a pull-schedule,to establish major milestones '-; for accountability and coordination which contribute a successful project.Those major milestones divide U, the schedule into shorter durations to track the progress of all team members and the project as a whole. This detailed schedule includes decisions required by the Owner,submittals to authorities,deliverables by consultants,and coordination/review time for all team members. `-1 In order to comply with set schedules,the Project Manager,Paul Martinez,AIA,must organize the team and U' the workload to meet the agreed upon dates.He must not only coordinate and communicate with his in- house team,but also the various engineers and sub-consultants.Paul has demonstrated his ability to do this • on the multiple projects he has managed,by staying in continual communication with the Owner and the team members,and ensuring they have the information they need to complete their work.He also requires �J that sub-consultants provide their work prior to a deadline to ensure that it is received and reviewed prior to �`` submittal to the Owner. U- 6b.Identify all key steps,phases,milestones,approvals,and project meetings you anticipate in a proposed __, schedule for the project. U Activity A. . .-I -t- Project Involvement Milestone D Duration - < POR:/SOR Validation, • 4 Weeks - •c2 meetings. . : OAC kick-off and'Validation. • �' Survey&GeoTech •• . review/approval: L-:' Schematic Design 10 Weeks Wkly OAC Meetings Concept,Concept development, �, begin and continue SD submittal review/approval. throughout project,and Start weekly OAC meetings, �, Meetings with TXDOT submit estimate - and City of Bryan PAC _ _.__ _ Design Development 8 Weeks • Drawing reviews, . .DD review/approval mtg.,GMP , • J CMAR's GMP due at'end review%approval mtg. • of this phase U Construction Documents 12 Weeks Drawing Reviews, 50%CD submission and review, completed drawings, 95%CD submission and review, �; updated GMP,and submit sealed documents to City, • ,, bid docs released for GMP budget update,and GC `,, subcontractors bidding release bid documents U Bidding for finalizing • 3 Weeks' City approval;GC collect City approval,submit final subcontractors and city bids,project team • addendum,Bid`day/review bids` ..` approvals • , review and approve bids .• +,-i Construction 14 Months 2 OAC meetings/month City permits,substantial Administration completion,final completion,and �, 11 month warranty walk _/1 C, Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 `-� 65 .,_) r: SECTION 0 PART 6-SCHEDULE&BUDGET CONTROL 1 rArkitex .-, w0 6c.For the projects listed in response to the experience of firm's proposed personnel,provide a list of the project m costs indicating the initial estimate,the original bid amount,the negotiated bid amount(if any),the final closeout cost,change orders,and the reason for the change orders. BRAZOS COUNTY EXTENSION OFFICE `` '. BRYAN,TEXAS . ' , n Initial Estimate:$2,500,000 1-:8%, , Original Bid Amount:$2,229,400 including alternates. • . OWNER CREDIT ! �l Negotiated Bid Amount:$2,229,400 Final Closeout Cost:$2,169,339 Number&Amount of Change Order(s)&Reason For The Change Order(s):One Change Order to ,--- credit$60,000 of the owner's $100,000 contingency amount not spent during construction and 9 Change -' Proposal Requests equaling $40,000 or 1.8%. `--` Reason:Change Proposal Requests included revisions to door hardware,optional ceiling framing,adding ,-� speakers,card readers,and security cameras into the project,adding a mechanical chase to conceal ductwork,and adding steel for folding partition support. r BRAZOS COUNTY ESD 4 FIRE STATION 2 -- BRYAN,TEXAS - Initial Estimate:$1,000,000 • Original Bid Amount:$940,000 4N=PROGRESS:h•. (-r Negotiated Bid Amount$940,000 ,--, Final Closeout Cost:In-Progress. " ;,'.:Li-,----.- =-y=� n Number&Amount of Change Order(s)&Reason For The Change Order(s):4 change orders totaling • $13,646. Reason:Changes for owner requested additional signage on the building,addition of railing under stair, ,�. guardrails at stair,and structural steel revisions for unforeseen conditions in concealed locations t-, TDI BROOKS • . BRYAN,TEXAS • Initial Estimate:$5,000,000 phase 2 of 3 only) • 1.3%•; .e' • :OWNER C.RE•DIT r' Original Bid Amount:$5,100,000 GMP f Negotiated Bid Amount$5,100,000 GMP ``' • ' ° / , Final Closeout Cost:$5,065,500 (phase 2 of 3 only) _ -.-'-// r, Number&Amount of Change Order(s)&Reason For The Change Order(s):6 Change Orders over 3 project phases for a total of$65,500 or 1.3%of the total cost. Reason:Changes included both costs and credits.In phase 2,a restroom and air conditioning was added,by `; the Owner,to the lab building mezzanine during construction. o. fl Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 /-`, 66 SECTION 0 PART 6-SCHEDULE& BUDGET CONTROL \� D CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CENTRAL PARK OPERATIONS CENTER ¢ 5. BRYAN,TEXAS IN7PROGR•ES5 Initial Estimate:$6,020,918 Original Bid Amount:$3,667,500 includes alternates accepted Negotiated Bid Amount$$3,673,500 'f `-) Final Closeout Cost:In-Progress . Number&Amount of Change Order(s)&Reason For The Change Order(s):0 change orders to date. Project is in-progress. Reason: N/A CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FACILITIES MAINTENANCE BUILDING BRYAN,TEXAS • Initial Estimate:$1,675,853 . 4o�a Original Bid Amount$1,772,076 GMP Negotiated Bid Amount$1,772,076 GMP ;• ., 'm Final Closeout Cost:$1,799,989 GMP Number&Amount of Change Order(s)&Reason For The Change Order(s):One Change Order to credit . $24,910 of the Owner's Contingency amount not spent during construction.Total of 5 Change Order Request totaling $75,090 or 4%. - Reason: Requests were for adding gas service to the building,addition of the generator to the _ project,nodifications to guard railing at mezzanine,and revisions to the existing detention pond. 6d.Will the consultant fees be included in the basic architectural service provided by the firm?If not,how do you proposed to bill the County for those services?Which services will be self-performed and which ones will be sub- - contracted? Consultant Fees Arkitex Studio will include all consultants services needed to provide professional services for this project in one proposed fee.Arkitex studio will provide architectural services including planning,design,and construction administration.Structural,civil,and MEP engineering services,as well as landscape design,IT/ Data design,and cost estimating services will be provided by our consultants. 6e.Describe how you propose to control the quality of construction. L Quality Control Arkitex Studio provides comprehensive construction administration services as an integral aspect of our services.During this phase,we provide a thorough review of submittals,visit the project site every other week at a minimum,and hold regular meetings at the site to facilitate communications and encourage orderly progress of the work. The Project Manager and Project Architect maintain consistent involvement and responsibility during the construction phase.Photo documentation is provided for reference. We have found that clear,open and constant communication between the design team,owners,and contractor �- is integral to successful projects at all stages of the work. The Project Manager will actively seek and L l implement communications efforts with all parties. Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 67 (`y t . (l SECTION 0 PART 6-SCHEDULE&BUDGET CONTROL 1 �` Arkitex (.'7 ,-, No project can be completely free of any issues,though we strive for that goal.When problems do occur ,- Th or circumstances change after a project us underway,we have the skills and expertise to work through the situation and find solutions. I'm Example As an example,Astin Aviation,as a gateway to Aggieland,needed to provide a high aesthetic quality that ,� required exceptionally sleek detailing and construction.During construction,it emerged that the fire protection system subcontractor had not read the specifications closely enough to approach this project with adequate finesse,resulting in inappropriately placed system components which the subcontractor then had to remove.To aid the correction process,The Arkitex Studio provided detailed drawings of sprinkler system components to guide the sub's work.Fortunately,the issue was caught in time to not impact other '`: trades or the project schedule. (-, 6f.What is your anticipated time-frame for 100%documents,please provide full schedule to get to 100%. 100%Construction Documents ,-' Our proposed schedule,estimates a 10 month design schedule.This schedule includes everything from the , initial project team meeting to the completion of the 100%CD's and submission of the sealed drawings to -- the City of Bryan. ' Anticipated Time-Frame . Schematic Design 10 weeks Design Development 8 weeks Construction Documents 12 weeks '-. Total=8 months+ 1 month review time+ 1 month POR= 10 month design schedule �� rN: Activity Approximate ProjeGtriil Involvement Milestone Duration >l POR/.SOR Validation, ' 4Weeks .2 meetings " OAC kick-off and Validation ' !-"` Survey'&GeoTech review/approval`. _ . ; 1, Schematic Design 10 Weeks Wkly OAC Meetings Concept,Concept development, begin and continue SD submittal review/approval. throughout project,and Start weekly OAC meetings, ,n Meetings with TXDOT submit estimate and City of Bryan PAC ' Design Development • :• 8 Weeks Drawing reviews, DD review/approval mtg,GMP CMAR's GMP due atend review/approval mtg. ` . of this phase . • Construction Documents 12 Weeks Drawing Reviews, 50%CD submission and review, completed drawings, 95%CD submission and review, r-: updated GMP,and submit sealed documents to City, bid docs released for GMP budget update,and GC ram, subcontractors bidding release bid documents Bidding for finalizing .3 Weeks City approval,GC collect City approval,submit final r-, subcontractors and city. . bids,project team • addendum;dum,Bid day/review bids r. approvals review and approve bids ;...0 C.' Brazos County l Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 i, 68 . ^.•,,i .iAir T•II y1i r 11•• .',.' .. • 1i t.'I'I a r .--- 11,'..1. .c.t,e-"*1:..1.:.,,:‘i,•-!.-.-•;-,i.et.:.7.‘'..'..,.'-.:,.1:.,•,rP,...,,''':.'-\.,.\ ,,.i.,-"-..7-_.-....;.1....-.,..,..,..,'s•. _1 .:(:.:1.,((1,Il,1..i 41,,k-,II 1'..,C-‘,-,.-.I o'I.:1:I.;,•\7'''`1,‘.I.z::,I\'';I.—„\.1-\..,...1'.4\.')\-':,•.,Z‘\„-:I Ip\,N•1:.V.J:.N f I I k •.\'„.,, ‘• ''..'‘,.'.,,,'.i'1t-'I,.,i..',t1,•_,,,a','.'`'t,,.•. ,-fi:.,,,.a.,4-4•.1•','.k'''1-'4.I.I'*,t•c';L 1.:'.t,.,..,•11..,'...•,"•'.‘kt:1.„e t.,?-.-Ii,.4'-)j i 1t•,,.\:,eM.-„"'',.''`-1(t,:'.,'.,::\„v,1"..'..'\."\•!•:.ce.•,\l;."2N•.....,..4‘1.I:.;,,:L‘.•,"•i.‘,':'•,"•,,‘,%:•,,' •').,,,:\4\:,.\:)..i..4"'-%V1 N.,•),\:-.11 1.,Ic...,`',,'.,,.l.,c',.'..':.'-',.',c`z„1,C,-:,.0..',,I-1' '•-'`-,,s':•:1.v.,•1'I*N•I•I.•,I I I•I'I.:I''•'I,,.I ,,., ;,, - •,,,, '. ,, - -, - , ,, -,,,., .--,.. ...kr• '''; -..\\:• •- , i - , "....:.; . I - • 1---:___,--•-••C".0. L, '......... •,,N, , ' II 5 '• , .. ', l'" ' . • \ -' ... .. , . II , . , "N ' ‘';:v.,';',',,,,, .,,,,,I,:. •'-,°- '. I i . . , „ ,. ,.. ,. . _.....,...„. , \,,,,......\....,„.....,.,. ....... ,, , : ,...„.... ,.. ., _.....,.. .,, , ..• . , ,.,, i=An :P, -.1; •.', ', -, „ ;,-,‘,,.. ', .. i y i is., , , , 4 ? • ! "lrir.'' :-.1111\%"•' ..''' '''' \ ' !: , , 1 ', • • '' ' " '..• %i".'•.,, ,I, ,'"''', '2 .. , ....L-•.,, :. ''....s, '''' !„..---• '7. u•N .,ig in ,.. i,.,....,„:„...... .„,...# ,.., , • , •,-, ,.- • ,,.„-.. ..• :•.,,\ :• •-.1-t• .••• • - .`. ' ‘.1'" Z . ' L. I -"I.,',....-&-,-;•1.-_,....--____ .,.-.,‘„,,,• , , •-, -,,,...2..- ,,!- k, • •. i • A-4_ • •., ri- -• , ... '.,L.--7._4 IS••'51s , ,...,/ , : ,.,LIU: "!;!'•q ..!,," . . .,;1-1.4",) - .- - A,v • . • . ',. -.„.• -Pt-: .. . . , , , ----,..--n -.:---1-r-'4--- -*:::::: ::z........7.17,'-' • ' ',' ' .., •:-..-tn: •-..).,J1-.31:.._ .,,,..,, ..-: ,47,,,,,?:, t ,,..,..-- ,....„',‘, , ; , •. . I .; L. , . ...... „- .,, ... „... ,. . , •• . -,•••-•• ' '' '."". , • ,• 1 ------.— .,*'''',-,, .. '-.1\ . . . , ,/,\ i : 1 ; ,---,--,,— ---1 , , -- - -1 '..) ' '• CLI. •-:'(' FiLit; .- 'i I 41 • .,,__.1 .,f--'--"- ,-, 1• . ,, • ; 1- i I ' ' /r.4.,a, 'MB •, f • • - • ; t : - . - - - . . I • ..:..,.`1••••••M /7.----“...."..----;'—:. • "7-.:5-.4-..-- I . : '-'7.1' ' . - .'' • \ -I, .,, i .,. • . , 1-T .---- .:_• i__I • ,., .-. f,p ',...,... v., , .., ,,, 1 -.'•„•.'s2" ,'"' • --4:-.t••••-..-f_.:'-: •••• ., i I La 3 72:1---'-', ..i • - 2-1.-%.-i- '''•-: — 1-ad ' - •. . f ....../.; Viti%1D: 14 I , Li,,-,.,. i --1';' ,-, :"' -.I'll---1 I— : • , -. .r.---:-..r.!_-..--_-.7'.1.1 — • . .., . • ........"?-. - . - . . i.144.-,•••_ -.7" r • 4 - . ...., -. . Nt„. • '' ..--• ••h Rik . 1H . ..._ - . . . . . .. •• ". .11 , 41F '.1:; i 0., , D , . . , . . ,i' ..L.L-.1,-1._. ,,__ _ • ...- '' , . •, . ...._____ ''.."`.,.1 i • 1 n 77 Is • , . . ...- - .,..-•,- . . ..: ,....„..,.., ,. ,_ ‘. , r---; i.. I'' ' • 17:111: i t 1.--- r,- -IL,a '1, ,...j. „ . .3.,, ,--„":,;--- .... .. . . , , ..., , ; . . . . • • . -. • , \ ' •, t .‘ ' ‘. ; • ,.' ' ) ' . ' ' • SECTION 0 PART 7-UNIQUENESS `-- Arldtex '' UNIQUENESS • 7a.In three hundred(300)words or less,explain why you believe your organization is uniquely qualified to provide design services for Brazos County.Include any other information,which you feel would be helpful in the selection `—J of your firm in this project. Arkitex's Unique Qualifications • Serving public entities has been at the core of Arkitex Studio's practice since our founding almost 30 years ago.There is no other architecture firm in Brazos County that knows institutional facility design better than '—' our team.With our office located within walking distance of the project site and decades of local experience, we offer an unmatched understanding of the County's operational needs,permitting requirements,and even the region's unique soil characteristics,ensuring a seamless project from concept to completion. Our team of seasoned architects and trusted engineering partners have consistently delivered thoughtful, efficient,and durable designs for civic facilities.We have assembled a comprehensive team of experts, ' including civil,structural,and MEP engineers,who bring resumes filled with projects of similar size and scope.The makeup of our team includes all local firms,many of them HUB firms,further reinforcing Brazos '-- County's commitment to equity and community investment. ` ' We pride ourselves on designing facilities that reflect the values and aspirations of the communities they U serve.For Brazos County,this means creating a space that supports the vital functions of the County while respecting taxpayer resources through efficient,long-lasting design.As architects and members of this -' community,we understand the importance of creating spaces that foster trust,security,and operational `.1 excellence. • With a proven history of delivering for Brazos County and a team deeply rooted in this community,Arkitex Studio is uniquely positioned to exceed expectations on this project.Our local presence ensures unmatched accessibility and responsiveness,while our collaborative approach guarantees innovative solutions _' tailored to the County's needs.We are ready to deliver a facility that strengthens Brazos County's judicial - infrastructure and serves its community for decades to come. • We look forward to working with the County again. 'J t I + mac: TI. . 4 Lt.-.--z_--_i_ _1 i 1 [ .----zr,i4 , P �} . A 1 , Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.OP 25-529 • 1 70 ..- - . SECTION'acIzgacb. jArkitex SECTION.S Pg Qg Rg Sff & 7 • P.If chosen,as the architect for this project,you will be asked to sign a professional services contract. Section P If The Arkitex Studio,Inc.is chosen as the architect for this project,our firm is ready,willing,and able to sign a professional services contract. Sections a R,S,&T are attached 0/7 the forms provicieci in the REQ. 4•.,,;1Y.0044i 1•-(.••.rt-Zr`--.--;''11.'4,,1,;6 Ac.-4.4,s,I.„,:;,'"A.:•:"1„:'Q%sR.I„1 i,'.kl.A.0-.S0'V4.;...'.'.Z•,'i,•-';1i•'1;."- ,.u,''9"•s,::'4- 5-.49))&,•'-P- t..'1-X-''-'1'‘,;';':r'''''r'I'.t-r'.k.-4-?••.X-1.4.1. 1'-f'.1lft.V?f...,71s`";!7,•,P..3;i 7,:6,(',;.?•l,Cv;g';b',,i,'Ae,. r)t,,,ej.,,•,fi7f,A.-4'`,4 4-4/,,';.t;.,;.,r,,;--f,!‘-..::-,rf•....•r,._..-•.4“, ,• ,,.i f,'•f.- ;•,,•.,•,,.„,I.)v..-..,,(1„,.4..,-,...,,,.,.,,4,,/•,,,,,......1,.4iNc.k,:'.,ie.t?,,.,T,,.„....,e..t.€.,e,,•i4 7,,4-g,f;..,•._m;-=.%.•,.41,.l:.f!,,.,-,.4>,,e,,v..-;,,,.,),,,.,,..r.t.,,,, '.-5,.,.,..,..,,,-.J<.,I',-.-,-,..,e.-,-•.l,'v,.•,-.,-,,4-..,i0 f.;:4..4,,.),.4:t•-....-%,.,i-'1„.-4-.„*..`,5.,-*i...,,(1e:,f.„.: ... , 7 30 YRS t 75% / 70+PROJECTS v. ", ..., FOR PUBLIC .i .,..-... --,.."4" • :'I IN THE 1.— OF OUR WORK :if',"'",z, ;•li=" •.•'..!'I,. BRAZOS IS REPEAT „•,:::,..4,,,,,. E IN;IsTTI E5SyTATRHsE..44.4:::::::;0;H::,;,..1,::,!‘„,,:;?•,:,:p.:..;c4r)A.,i _.: A, -• A • a ,44k...4-'' f 1.•!'.., Al_LEY CLIENTS. . ,r,,,,IN ,:ik,.sn,4,,,,,,- /i.:..91.iro.14, : i''1(6':. '. • - ' ' •Se,'e,,,P.- .%)& .:%T.,'- -I,-- •`.--,wvIwz•*-...--,-17-,,-p.::-- .,..,--- ,u.:-, • -- ,,,Z.71'.' '-W.4,1:i I-cre „..4,-.,•..q.„-:,.,,,,11,, ,,,,, , *, • „,..,0 :,, . ,. .,.: , .,•,-. , ',..q'',,,' 4,‘.4. 4,'. 4,-"/' 3%, • ' Li,.{' .-Cgr.l' 4.2./..„3.-4;• . ', .:A ',.f...•-1 4dtzt..Frip "" , ,..'•it97-'i'0-;.',._--1,-44•-'4'f'47,,...1' -40 '7.44iCqr--'4;70:,, -- .:1-!'';',. ,>.:.r`e'• .-..,:'-7,,5',•-.01,''--,,--,,f,' - , , ',,,:'-':,,':,'lit ::r.-1'0V 4114,;.!'-<";:iffi,V5A‘.1.C:40;3-4„,.',3',i't;4407'.'4} '''Sil0 • -. ,,,f,t.:`''''',,,, , tr'..47q,,,X.Zi•.,1, ,-''.,..?'-iff.:',,,,,,,,,li,r'''',,'..'Zi."•7r--"--_ ' i.-. .' :',.. ., •. - "'It '' : ',-;.jt'/ , ' i. ,:'''',, ';--%','4:-.)1:$,"'4•4,41;;Wi;;- :45.4-t, '',,'a-,:-*4=.,t.".. ,,• -i,:,-,7 ,.,--:--°, -• ',',--, ,„:: -::=....„,,,,,,e,:t''...: '' •„'...',,..rf,„ 1,-.•:- I,-t ,-5:0- - ,-,:'3 :1 ..?4,-,:',1. ,',NIC ..,„: , ,% , ,, ,_ ''.2Si.lp,,...{,,Y, `-, "`", 11`4 1ir..V. 75''"'" ',;-: ^4.,:,,..":".,,,,,:„.1'' ',...i.,•-.:;,.. ‹.1.`,..%;,,,:,,,',,,.Z".,.--4-..,,,,, 14-V..,,i,E...,.14'.'4::47At."-cr'-?A:"1-,,,, tr .',;:-'-', :g.'-', , -. ',1' -' ' -$.-:‘, ',, . _ ,--'''.11`.:41.-_.di:%;z-e-'4,-•-',V,,,,,t44:k,sPw--,wP.,,,e:A--., -..--, 14.41P -r`-' -44/.> AA);'% .. -1.,r,..E. .• ' ., , • •.. Ti,:-.A-'"9`,,,x,.X,,,''.;74"1--5„,,.."'„'i! "„,,,17,4.,-.:::4,t,'"...11444,',".#_,35,',Z. - ).•''''",/•4,ot„,-4..-'41:1:,. •ee .... -, "-, V ,...4- -",-,-.'•.-- ..,-,4--,..., ,...* - < ,.._-,r Tab.,,- ...i ' ..";:t .`,,,r''' '''' ` ,,',- ` „ 4'', ''''..-k'w ' .^,,,,:•-• -, - '''''.'.4:I'''. :''' ..' , s - 11‘ .P....,i0 Mir I MEW 5 ,.-'...'.-- - ' , •, 1 a ,n,10 ....... - Imm--... . -1 - Il I -filii2591.M.- MEM - ItL111„ .15afigair UNNIMII, 111111.111XM. ENE i - ir . `5?*.iY,Ye. 4_,rtz.:10,-••'''' ' - 1.,. 1 ---j• -7 c------ Mt 'or- II. Egli lull. Hsi 1 , • ini . ,.. . .„:.,..__ • _..... „.• _,,,, ..,.. .._ MI-II_ All ____111111_1(1. ..----___ _--:- ,,, -:- --,------,t._-;iiiiiNgii;-T4----------' • -..4, -.4-.T.,_ 7. 7"---------2 ,.,. .---,_ `. .___-___.*:.-.2.-..t - .......1,-...- -,-.,. ,...-- ..„,...-4k-_,!--0--...,..,,,t,__,._„._ - --... -... „,,,,:j.,--y, . _-......,,,,_,-, .:....,.. • _ _ __--__- . .... - .1 v-- ,-,,,,.-44..A4 :..,c,_•, 1 -.-4--., - .-- .,___--_ -- --- -, .-,,„_, t.0 r- ,_-_,..,-----..- • - _ ...\ ". +,. N r ,---,...-- _,.....,•-•----,._.. - , ' --,-. .";•,,---svi-04,,,z,,•,,,,,,,-i-.•••,.• '•..'„ -2,,T,‘;',,i7"`'•,,tiii. ,....,--''— - ----T'v ,,,;:-'-'‘,04-'•P., ' K-__...---- ---=-14----- , -----i- "' " --- '''''-.. -.`.,..riii"-W7r:'.-A.v*''''''4'}-4,1-----I -34:,,c, 42.-'''",`4-N,' * ).: '' ',t•:,:--v,•.4!,- -4,----•-: .;,-:.,-\'•f kl,;, .4,..r-Ati ,- "1"" :../.,-.47 .-,0..-i"..'i -'''-.-"-' - , -,-:„..,T.13-2. ...;:,,,, ---- •-- ,.',-I-f.-.'1.:Zr: - ' -,- 01,1...:Z1 Y''',.':.'''....e.---,* "N"A..'4R.7"'`''_ ,iz''' treiffi .,_-_,,..4'yr'e r%'4,'P k s't::4- 1 psiVittr -• ----.. •4' g , - • -.'5.` ••\L'ity,---r'-':'-.,...f--...P.If- v--7-.::;., €4`-r--..;-.J,-ir:s.:.,1'..', .--''-',7 •=-T,... -.`"- Al...,.. l'ir'' ' j.k. , --.'A- ' k.:,y • =V , I.• ' :.-J.-4:4;C, ...•_.;;#4,7,._•... i_ ,1•..,-\.t-3„v_,4,;;.--k,-- iro...=„ - ••_,_....,i-:,..._:•••• .; .1.- „itzr.,,...,:,...., ._ , ......,--- -.---c".2.-.„ ,-.', -....., srtrz, -:. • ,-4:—,5"P-4,...---...v-:-T--.- t. ..-?..70.-1,,,,A,„ • -- -4 ,V-7-.''AV...-.- - -t,-- g -••,` :. .-x1::"' ' ..+4,,..."--!4" -E-'2,-;:. .7,. ' ." :-.."- b-f,101 ,,,,,.r. 4—- •,‘,.., - --,--..._-= - .. . ._ •., --,--.—,- , • -:. . -,.3. , • .-- - . _ _-- - — , ,—4,,--1,0,•,g„,...,,.. le„.. , ,_ .1„,i)..., ,. ,,_,I,r,-.,- --k ‘,1.•j- --,‘,.- ,, v.1 ‘ )Lif.,t.i.,1 4, JI,C1.•.- ,%,.• - 0 .iit..k ,, , „„fft, ,,/ ,I, i,„ .,„cii,u,..,„,,,,t, Ady,..if:,,EilaJn,i,-a.,-.S....',Oal-I, ". Lt,...4., ,. ,., . ••. .,.„I/s„.1... ,s,.,,), •4 ,.,,,t., , , ,,k, 1,0 t . r \ 0, ,,A114/1 I)\14?Iligir'l .ftV,e' .1.;' .'"\''' '",i '-6. 13'5 q•,'A--:',,1-1,'N'ly,f.' t-Vg-gl vq-q: v.nty -'.,.•,_ v i/ph,\,1/44 l'•,, f, ;, ):,(,r 0,,,,i 1-kp,, , ...,,i,,,,,,,,,rh,,,,,_ yr,'"t..c.i#11\• ."' -y.:,,r1 r .•:,"%hi );.•I'll,•,,,., 6*1,,.111N 1.120#: , ,•;.,,,,, „•., j;e #,.. ..?,.1,-4, .,,,,,-,,,,, , •••• \ `,,0 I,,1:,-...0, J., ••-.,r,.,,,,,,4,..„{,,.."-•:/,; e 1/'ev -,,b,,, i f,. ,''',.-icl„4, I,,Ai 1.' '„• ,.o.",-, •, 09'1,4P -th - ' •. 1, -tlikt,if 1.1 - le , '.IA• . tr2•• (,,, . , .i '- Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites]RFQ No.CIP 25-529 71 a .J SECTIONP, Q, R, S&T r � Arkitex 10 SECTIONSP, Q, R, S, & T Q. REFERENCES Vendors shall provide a list of at least five (5) references,where work comparable in quality and scope to that specified has been performed within the past five (5)years. This list should include r the names, phone number and email of the company/entity for which the prior work was performed to contact these references. References received on previous solicitations for similar size and scope in the previous six (6) months may be considered in lieu of obtaining a new reference check. A negative reference may be grounds for disqualification of bid. Bidders are not allowed to use Brazos County as a reference. Company/Entity: The Texas A&M University System, Office of Facilities Planning & Construction Contact: Lee Gibson Phone: 979.777.6588 Email: Iglbson@tamus.edu • Company/Entity: First Baptist Bryan Church Contact: Pastor Daniel Webb Phone: 979.776.1400 Email: Daniel@fbcbryan.org r-, Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 72 SECTION P,Q, R,5&T • • Arkitex tU it SEcrioNs P, Q, R, S, & T rmi •. .- '7 ..••• i Company/Entity: Astin Partners Contact: Randall Spradley Phone: 979-595-3205 Email: jrs@astin.us 7 i",•1,'• ,:". ;" "" ";• " , , , 7 , .,A •].). t 2 4:0 •,z..:ift'...fa! Company/Entity: City of College Station -) Contact: Rusty Warncke fl Phone: 979.764.3486 Email: rwarncke@cstx.gov 1 - . -• Company/Entity: The Texas A&M University AgriLife Extension Contact: David De Leon Phone: 979.314.5870 Email: dodeleon@ag.tarnu.edu () r (1-1) / • Brazos CountylAshford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites 1 RFQ No.CIP 25-529 fl . 73 SECTION P,Q, R,S&T • Arkitex ED . , SECTIONS P, Q, R, Sy & T R. PROPOSAL EVALUATION WAIVER By submitting a proposal or response,each Proposer/offeror indicated below agrees to waive any claim it has or may have against Brazos County (the Owner), Architect, Engineers, Consultants and their respective Commissioners, directors, employees, or agents arising out of or in connection with (1) the administration, evaluation, or recommendation of any proposal or response (2) any requirement under the Request for Qualification or related documents; (3)the rejection of any proposal or response or any part of any proposal or response; and/or (4) the award of a Contract,if any. The Proposer further agrees the Owner reserves the right to waive any requirements under the proposal documents or the Contract Documents, with regards to acceptance or rejection of any proposals, and recommendation or award of the contract. Note: The Statement of Affirmation Must be Notarized. STATEMENT OF AFFIRMATION "The undersigned affirms that he/she is duly authorized to execute this waiver by the person(s) ,' or business entity making the proposal. Firm's Name: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. Address: 308 N. Bryan Ave., Bryan, TX 77803 Proposer's Name: Mike Record,AIA 1 Position/Title: Principal-In-Charge 1 y --< Proposer's Signature: Date: 01.28.2025 Subscribed and sworn to me on this 28 day of January in the year 2025 •t Janet Divin2/1011--K-A, a`"'"a''a,, JANET DIVIN • Notary Publi __ :Notary Public,State of Texas • N.; °Q; Comm.Expires 10-08-2027 • 0i,,,,,,�r Notary ID 130399380 My Commission expires 10.08.2027 S. ADDENDA The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the following addenda issued during the time of Bidding and includes the several changes therein in this Proposal. No. 1 No. No. Date 01.16.2025 Date Date 19 Page rr Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 74 SECTION P, Q, R,S&T I . Arkitex -m N,0 SECTIONS P, Q, R, S, oC T • F� • �. Brazos County s r�•. o* Purchasing Department ,~ r- f 1 200 S.TX.AVE.,STE 352. BRYAN,TX 77803 PHONE(979)361-4292 FAX(979)361-4293 j ' Addendum #1 to CIP 25-529 Architect for Ashford Hills Warehouse & Office Suites - Issued: January 16,2025 "1 Change: Pushing Back Proposal Due Date Reason: Weather Due to the unpredicted weather on Tuesday,January 21,we are pushing back the proposal due date. Proposals are now due prior to 2:00pm on Tuesday,January 28,2025. This addendum should be signed by an authorized representative of the respondent and returned with the bid documents as specified in the bid. Acknowledgement of Ad r Signature: Printed Name: Mika Remold,ALA ( • • • � C C -) • r> Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 75 r--, SECTION P, Q,R, S&T l Arkitex Slido SECTIONS P, Q, R, S, & T T. CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL The undersigned affirms that they are duly authorized to execute this contract, that this bid has not been prepared in collusion with any other Contractor, and that the contents of this bid have not been communicated to any other Contractor prior to the official opening. Signed By: 7 Title: Principal-In-Charge Typed Name: Mike Record, AIA Company Name: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. Mailing Address:308 N. Bryan Ave., Bryan, TX 77803 , P.O.Box or Street City State Zip Employer Identification Number: 74-2816195 I . CORPORATE SEAL IF SUBMITTED BY A CORPORATION END OF RFQ NO. CIP 25-529 By signing below, Brazos County agrees that this RFQ CIP 25-529 will be awarded to the vendor whose name appears above and both parties agree to the terms and conditions contained herein. By: Brazos County Commissioner's Court Date: Attest: Brazos County Clerk The following items should be completed and included in your bid submission. Failure to r ` include these items will disqualify your bid. ❑ References (Section Q) t J ❑ All Addendums (if applicable) -d ❑ Certification of Proposal(Section T) Brazos County I Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites I RFQ No.CIP 25-529 J _J 76 C -' , . Arkitex _ Studio . . 308 N.Bryan Ave. - Bryan,TX 77803 , , P (979) 821-2635 --- F (979) 775-8224 www.arkitex.com , •-,, • . , ,„3-1-_,,..1f1P1-•',1111,h '\ 'IT,' - •:''Z'g."1..-'4 7'i.''.. - • ‘.I'1 111". ' I I. I ' .'''. "...', 'Ai":' .^.1..,LI -•-•,7:-'1-7(A/.1 d • ''''''- 1, i::, VI..‘ Alt'. I'''', I I t 1 ' 1 .. ii. , t r•,..1.,.' te rlir;vz,_., r ' r 4,;,.. zk,•/;"'•-,—iv,:4C.,-.4,''..;'), ,:,..., 1 ' tf''...IfY i(ii `k)i';'''‘,..,"',1...'", AK '1:111- .'-- L----,-- -----71k, • ''''i•' 1 - ' ;% !‘- I'',• I y i I • ''' 41/7 lirt•k , ' '!1''ft. I. -;40'' i''' ' ..) ,'44:17 . ,ki,'11 1 . T). 0 •..., ,..,,,:-, '; . - ,- . ...-,-:.-..,, -, I ki i.- --. .,/ i•v,I , i .. ,. .. , :.,.. T. , t ...r.,... - ... , -.,..._;-...-r•-.,v,,,--- .11111k— N I , / "te;,_,. )4?,- ,./.., , , , , ' 1 ' itl. ':=T•I. •-•, i 474. 'Aty,s'• , • J ' ik ' 1•y, vs - . \I I , ° 4 1 - A , ., - •, ,IA , ,I if — .:-,i ---- -'„ . , , , I fit, v -/- .. .,... _i II A .,, \ ,.&,,,i \,...._., .. .,... .. , 1 ,_?.. _. .. ..ii ,r, , - ,, . 1 .,_., --- it. ''':. ' i ' 1 ...._ k vi...... \I -•w \,.t. td -- . - , _., . . ‘--4 , ) ‘Ir tf ; ,..-' t 3 '''-,- r 1 1 . ) -- v iii .. ...., , , ,‘ ..„ ,i., ,, , ,. , \ .. .\\_ 1---, • -.- 4, 1 \\--1 —1 ,. . -,i, 1 . MP, :.---•,,,,,,' cr .•,-: \ ;, ' :(-- -:7c1— r 3' ipk. c,.` „...,. •, _ 's'l , .,' --\ i ( ',, ` -I, -•"' , ' , I....,-.•— ' ' \ . r, -- • — c - s ,,a. .._ ,. -----yi, ,:--.:: 7-- -;-",.' . . K_ 4i,.. '4..., N.J. . / - ,4' N -1 4:'. '- i ':•‘=;‘''..e , .,.....,:..,:31* ::: t:le 1 -.' 'AI r .....,.. i a'AAA-,.... •ANA... ' ' '' t ,4-`=••..'7-0--;,,_,Z--4.' 'IA --- - ., . --. Improving Lives. • . • ) Building Community. --, ,, RFQ#CIP 25-529 Architect for Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites Goodwin-Lasiter,Inc Powers Brown Max Points Sam Garcia Pillar Architecture PlanNorth Stanley Consultants, The Arkitex Studio, Available Architect,LLC Studio* DBA Goodwin-Lasiter- MRB Group Architectureal Co.** SZS Architecture Inc** Inc.** Architecture N.A., Strong"" LLC"" 1 Organization 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 2 Experience of Firm's Proposed Personnel 30 21 27 28 25 27 27 27 27 3 Process of Planning and Project Management 20 17 17 17 19 17 19 18 18 4 Firm's Proposed Subcontractors 20 18 17 16 18 17 16 18 18 5 Schedule and Budget Control 20 18 18 14 19 14 17 17 16 6 Uniqueness 5 4 5 3 5 4 4 4 3 Technical Proposal Total 100 83 0 89 83 89 83 87 90 86 *No Certification of Proposal in Qualifications **Interviewed Committee Recommended Award: The Arkitex Studio,Inc. Approved by Commissioner's Court on this day of ,2025 by holding the position of .. -711 •:-yam,.•.,••' BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Purchasing NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of No Award for RFP#CIP 25-562 Construction Manager at Risk for Ashford Hills Warehouse&Office Suites due to changing the project to a design-bid-build bidding process. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Kaitlyn Battles DATE: 04/29/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 It is recommended to complete the design of this project and ascertain the budgetary impact prior to entering into a construction contract. The design firm will provide estimates that will assist the County in properly budgeting for this project. NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: , _ `!r�- 06. BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Purchasing NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of No Award for RFP#CIP 25-571 Compensation &Benefits Study due to lack of qualified proposal responses. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Kaitlyn Battles DATE: 04/21/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: Requesting to no award due to only receiving one proposal that did not fully respond to the scope of work required. Requesting permission to re-advertise in a separate agenda item. 5/1/25,9:30 AM Item Coversheet .., " ; srYOE8�4,. BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN,TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Purchasing NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of No Award for RFP#CIP 25-571 Compensation&Benefits Study due to lack of qualified proposal responses. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Kaitlyn Battles DATE: 04/21/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: Requesting to no award due to only receiving one proposal that did not fully respond to the scope of work required. Requesting permission to re-advertise in a separate agenda item. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type RFP - Paypoint_HR LLC.pdf RFP Backup Material APPRO w a-5 Duane Peters Date County Judge https://brazos.novusagenda.com/agendaweb/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=30571 1/1 BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Purchasing NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Permission to Re-Advertise CIP 25-571 Compensation & Benefits Study. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Kaitlyn Battles DATE: 04/21/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 The evaluation committee from the original solicitation is requesting to re-advertise CIP 25- 571 Compensation &Benefits study due to the lack of responses from the initial NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: advertisement. Purchasing received one proposal that did not respond to the scope requested. The committee requested to modify the project schedule to allow more time for the study to take place, allowing the study to possibly be completed for the data to be used in 2027 proposed budget. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Request to Advertise.pdf Request to Advertise Backup Material Brazos County -f' Purchasing Department 200 S.TX AVE.,SUITE 352 BRYAN,TX 77803 PHONE(979)361-4290 FAX(979)361-4293 BRAZOS COUNTY BID/RFP/RFQ DOCUMENTATION SHEET The Purchasing Department would like to request Commissioner's Court approval to advertise and go out for Bid on the following: DATE: May 6, 2025 RFP NUMBER: CIP 25-571 TITLE: Re-Advertise -Compensation & Benefits Study REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Human Resources APPROVAL SIGNATURE: Duane Peters, County Judge DATE APPROVED: i C 25 --,rs..,•zas., 44, Y6 itti .t o*C' BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Purchasing NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of CIP#25-599 Commissioning Services for Ashford Hills warehouse and office suites with Tom Green &Company Engineers, Inc.for$81,430.00. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Presley Nelson DATE: 04/01/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: True BUDGETED: True DOLLAR AMOUNT: $81,430.00 BUDGET DETAIL: Fund 45000 -General Capital Improvement Fund Commissioning of the building is required by the building code.The vendor was selected NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: via RFP 24-135 for this service. It is imperative that we engage for these services at the juncture to achieve efficiencies with reduced corrections or redesign. The contract amount falls within the allotted budget for the project. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Partly Executed Proposal.pdf Partly Executed Proposal Backup Material Torn Green GE. ompany Engineers, inc. [ID:I March 31, 2025 PN 124147E CONFIDENTIAL Trevor Lansdown Brazos County 200 S Texas Ave Bryan, TX 77803 SUBJECT: Commissioning Services RFQ No. 24-135: Brazos County Central Receiving Building: Proposal for Commissioning Services through Design Trevor: We appreciate this opportunity to present our proposal for MEP and envelope systems commissioning (Cx) services through the design phase of the subject project. We look forward to serving you with timely and quality services. As I understand the project, it involves the development of warehouse space on an undeveloped plot of land in Brazos County. The project is currently in the pre-design phase and is anticipated to include construction through a construction manager at risk (CMR). Currently, the project development includes a site development plan that was used for a zoning change with the city of Bryan. Cx Services Description To better define the expected Cx scope, I offer the following outline of Cx Services that will be provided.As requested by the Owner,this proposal includes services only through the completion of the design phase of the project. The depth at which certain tasks are performed will be adapted based on specific project needs in accordance with the project budget. Other tasks may be added or removed from scope based on project specific needs and confirmation from the Owner. Pre-Design Phase Cx Services • Review of Owner Project Requirements (OPRs) for the project in coordination with the Owner for use by the design and construction teams in developing the project, including potential expansion of the OPRs as needed based on Owner needs that may be identified through the pre-design process. • Review of Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) and Architect/Engineer (NE) team qualifications and assistance to Owner in selection of CMR and/or NE teams, if requested by the Owner. • Assisting the Owner in developing project scope(s). • Attend project kick-off meeting(s). If requested by the Owner, TGCE can provide meeting minutes/records within seven (calendar) days of the meeting. Other meetings (e.g., assessment progress meetings) will be attended as applicable to the project and requested by the Owner. 3701 Executive Center Drive I Suite 258 I Austin,Texas 78731 (512)345-7793 I tgce.com Brazos County Central Receiving Building: Proposal for Cx Services through Design Design Phase Cx Services • Review of design documents at major milestones against OPRs, general code requirements and engineering fundamentals. The focus of such reviews shall be for the purposes of general constructability, functionality, and maintainability of the systems. o Anticipated milestones have yet to be determined. The hourly fee budget included herein generally anticipates the following milestones: • Programming • Schematic Design • 50% Design Development • 100% Design Development • 100% Construction Documents o Additional milestones might be added as determined by the Owner, CMR, and NE based on the project need, each of which will be reviewed by TGCE and WJE as part of their hourly efforts. TGCE will notify the Owner if we believe that additional budget is necessary for commissioning activities related to additional milestone reviews. o Conversely, fewer project milestones than those listed above will not impact the proposal/fee budget, as all reviews and Cx activities are billed hourly. Hours/fee not spent on Cx reviews can be spent on other Cx tasks or retained by the Owner if not used. • Review design specifications for appropriate of Cx obligations and provide supplemental Cx specifications/obligations. • Providing Cx review logs to the NE team noting findings from review of design documents. • Review of NE responses to Cx log items and confirmation that items were addressed by the NE team appropriately. • Attend design progress meetings, the frequency and length of which are to be as applicable for the particular project and determined by the Owner. In general, the commissioning authority's (CxA's) attendance will be virtual, unless in-person attendance is beneficial to the project or if the CxA is already onsite for other Cx activities. Meeting minutes/records are to be created and distributed by parties other than TGCE (unless otherwise agreed upon with the Owner). Understanding of Proposal Exclusions: It is understood that the following items are currently not requested, not applicable, or not expected to be needed by this team. To the extent scope is determined to be otherwise as the project evolves, related scope is subject to additional services. • The bid/negotiation, construction, and close-out phases of the project are not currently included in the CxA's scope of work. A separate or amended proposal can be provided if CxA services are later requested for these phases. • Design reviews and other Cx activities will generally be limited to MEP, fire alarm (FA), fire protection (FP), and building envelope systems. All other trades are not currently included in the Cx scope, except where such scopes are understood to impact MEP, FA, FP, and building envelope systems. To the extent that they are deemed to be necessary Page 12 Brazos County Central Receiving Building: Proposal for Cx Services through Design for the respective project scope, TGCE will engage those services for inclusion in Cx services. • Design milestone and other reviews will generally not include the CxA performing cooling/heating load calculations, hygrothermal analysis, or other detailed calculations/analysis. • Permitting for the project is understood to be the responsibility of other parties. • Opinions of Probable Construction Costs (OPCCs) are to be provided by parties other than the CxA(e.g., the CMR). Cx Services Fee We believe an hourly fee budget approach best fits the potentially varying level of effort required for these Cx services. Effort will be billed against the contracted fee on an hourly personnel cost expended in each billing period. This approach provides both an upper-limit protection for the Owner as well as the assurance that the Owner receives the benefit of all economies we experience. We have estimated our level of effort for this project to be $81,430 and propose that estimate as the fee budget. It is understood that hourly fee budgets may not be sufficient to complete all the necessary work for the project.As we approach the fee budget amount, TGCE so advises you to review the status of the project and expectations for further direction of work to mutually determine if an extension of the budget is appropriate or if we should pause our services upon reaching the budget. This review is to occur through our monthly invoicing for work performed for the prior work period,with direction by the Owner if it anticipates expansion of budget or restriction of work. The required level of effort for each project is influenced by a number of factors, such as project complexity, project delivery method, project design team, project construction team, and procurement issues (e.g., long lead times, etc.) or other economic factors that impact project schedule and may expand as Owner's needs are identified through the pre-construction Cx process. Some of these factors are outside of the CxA's control, but the CxA is committed to adapting their services to meet the varying needs of the project as can reasonably be accomplished within the agreed-upon fee budgets. Where such factors are expected to limit the work that can be accomplished within the agreed-upon fee budget, TGCE will notify the Owner of such and receive direction from the Owner on how to proceed. For reference, WJE's proposal for the building envelope commissioning services is attached.The fee budget presented in their proposal is included in the total fee budget indicated above. Additional Services Given the hourly budget approach to the project, additional services are not applicable, as all hourly efforts are invoiced. Page 13 Brazos County Central Receiving Building: Proposal for Cx Services through Design Invoicing Invoicing will be monthly with the net due in thirty (30) days, consistent with the Master Contract. Ours and our subconsultant's normal hourly rates which apply to our services can be found attached. (These rates are subject to annual adjustments in accordance with our standard salary review practices.) Reimbursables are in addition to labor charges. Reimbursables include costs of out-of-town travel (mileage at active IRS rates). Acceptance If this proposal is acceptable to you, please provide an approval consistent with your normal procedures. Should there be any questions or requested changes, please contact me to go over them at your earliest opportunity. We appreciate this opportunity to serve you and the Owner, and look forward to a successful project! Sincerely, Cameron Labunski, P.E. Principal Engineer Texas Firm Registration No. 2929 CL:wh Page 14 41. d 1 II yl 1 01, T.. BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Road and Bridge NUMBER: CC-2025-Utility Adjustment-BTU- Koppe Bridge DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Consider and take action on the Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU)cost estimate of$6,224.66 to relocate existing pole and guy wire. This work is needed in order to accommodate the proposed widening of Koppe Bridge Road. Site is located in Precinct 1. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Joe Salvato DATE: 05/01/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 Department requesting agenda item: Road and Bridge Department impacted by agenda item: Road and Bridge Brief explanation of agenda item and if in current year budget: BTU will relocate NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: existing pole and guy wire for the proposed widening of Koppe Bridge Road. Brazos County has budgeted this relocation cost in current year. Consequences for failing to approve agenda item: Inadequate ditch, can't widen road Deadline for agenda item approval: As soon as possible Site of work being performed: 6900 Koppe Bridge Rd, 0.2 miles south of Hopes Creek ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Utility Adiustment-BTU-Koppe Bridge.pdf Utility Adjustment-BTU-Koppe Bridge Road Backup Material 5/1/25,4:53 PM Item Coversheet f2 •r bn) ' I •'.,,n O. 'xGh r! `t, YOF9�. BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Road and Bridge NUMBER: CC-2025-Utility Adjustment-BTU- Koppe Bridge DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Consider and take action on the Bryan Texas Utilities(BTU)cost estimate of$6,224.66 to relocate existing pole and guy wire. This work is needed in order to accommodate the proposed widening of Koppe Bridge Road. Site is located in Precinct 1. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Joe Salvato DATE: 05/01/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 Department requesting agenda item: Road and Bridge Department impacted by agenda item: Road and Bridge Brief explanation of agenda item and if in current year budget: BTU will relocate NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: existing pole and guy wire for the proposed widening of Koppe Bridge Road. Brazos County has budgeted this relocation cost in current year. Consequences for failing to approve agenda item: Inadequate ditch, can't widen road Deadline for agenda item approval: As soon as possible Site of work being performed: 6900 Koppe Bridge Rd,0.2 miles south of Hopes Creek ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Utility Adjustment-BTU-Koppe Bridge.pdf Utility Adjustment-BTU-Koppe Bridge Road Backup Material APPROVED Duane Peters ate County Judge https://brazos.novusagenda.com/AgendaWeb/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=30629 1/1 1 s THE DIFFERENCE IS YOIA CHARGE TO: MAIL REMITTANCE TO: Mr. Joe Salvato Bryan Texas Utilities Brazos County Attn.: Colton Honeycutt 6900 Koppe Bridge Rd Project#:2412-R-53181 College Station, TX 77845 P. O. Box 1000 Bryan, Texas 77805 QUANTITY DESCRIPTION OF ITEM UNIT AMOUNT PRICE Cost to provide relocating guy wire. $6,224.66 NOTE: Do not include AIC payment in your monthly BTU bill. 2412-R-53181-55691 WorkStudio Cost Estimate 4l30/2025 BRAZOS COUNTY Staked By: COLTON HONEYCUTT DDRR9999-RELOCATE GUY WIRE-6900 KOPPE BRIDGE RD Staked Date: 12/04/2024 12:00:00AM Cost Of Labor: $44.88 Number on Crew 4 Install Units Unit Description QuantityLabor Cost Material Cost Al Al 1 $52.66 $38.50 A5 A5 2 $153.72 $101.06 A5SLACK A5SLACK 2 $105.32 $190.74 DG4 GRIP,DISTRIBUTION,#4 ACSR 6 $53.86 $9.60 E3-10 E3-10 4 $36.66 $18.20 E6-2 E6-2 2 $295.04 $262.01 F1-2 F1-2 2 $130.16 $214.84 M2-2 M2-2 3 $76.29 $0.00 P40-2 P40-2 3 $843.06 $2,428.32 ST4 TIE,SPOOL,#4 ACSR 1 $8.98 $2.72 WL4 TIE,DISTRIBUTION.#4 ACSR 1 $7.18 $4.11 Overhead $511.25 Transportation $264.44 Stores $32.70 Total Construction Costs: $5,841.42 $2,538.62 $3,302.80 Total Install Hours:39.28 I Retired Units Unit Description Quantity Labor Cost Material Cost A2 A2 1 $36.80 AR4 ROD,ARMOR,#4 ACSR 2 $10.77 E1-2 E1-2 1 $44.43 E3-10 E3-10 1 $5.39 F1-2 F1-2 1 $39.05 M2-2 M2-2 1 $15.26 P35-4 P35-4 1 $114.44 Overhead $77.18 Transportation $39.9_2 Stores Total Retired Costs: $383.24 $383.24 Total Retired Hours:5.93 . ESTIMATE SUMMARY Total Labor Cost Total Material Cost $2,921.86 $3,302.80 Total Construction Hours:45.21 Total Number of Days: 1.41 TOTAL COST: $6.224.66 LTA'S 1 GeoDigitat WORK:TUr.-0 WORK DESCRIPTION:BRAzos COUNTY DRAWN BY COLTON HONEYCUTT 12/412024 MAN HOURS CHECKED CHRIS LENZ 12126/2024 INSTALL 39.28 PROJECT NO 2412-R-53181 JOB NO 55691 INSPECTOR REMOVE 5.93 CONST TYPE OH PRI(OH) BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES 979-821-5770 BUSINESS NAME PAGE 1 of 3 f p 1 .. • lij.' l . I f \ . NS \ . { I * 6900 \ . , 41 .41 EX2?167140 f °, Ni tit - • \ Scale:1' 89 fool -._ -. .. .._ _ ._ _ _ .-r------ -- WORK DESCRIPTION: DRAWN BY COLTON HONEYCUTT 12/412024 MAN HOURS BRAZOS COUNTY CHECKED CHRIS LENZ 12/26/2024 INSTALL 39.28 PROJECT NO 2412-R-53181 JOB NO 55691 INSPECTOR REMOVE 5.93 CONST TYPE OH PRI(OH) BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES 979-821-5770 BUSINESS NAME PAGE 2 of 3 POLE N. POLE PRI. PRIMARY GUY SECONDARY AND SERVICE SEC/SERV .ECONDARY/SERVIC:. REMARKS NO. or R H/C SPAN UNITS WIRE ROUN' UNIT LEAD ANCHOR UNITS SPAN WIRE MISCELLANEOUS UNITS i N1 E 368 N P40-2 A5 M2-2 E6-2 30 F1-2 (2)E110 EX2-P167140: E 50 Lat 30.512140 Long: 96.338536 in-- R G �(2 Il E3.1 o� (2)AR4 —� A5 ill (3)DG4E&-2 30 10 ._ — - j N3 E 246 (2)#4ACSR N P40-2 Al M2.2 ST4 WL4 I I Drawing Remarks: Conductor Type Line Feet a of Wires Wire Feel WORK DESCRIPTION:BRAZOS COUNTY DRAWN BY COLTON HONEYCUTT 12/4/2024 MAN HOURS CHECKED CHRIS LENZ 12/26/2024 INSTALL 39.28 PROJECT NO 2412-R-53181 JOB NO 55691 INSPECTOR REMOVE 5.93 CONST TYPE OH PRI (OH) BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES 979-821-5770 BUSINESS NAME PAGE 3 of 3 f it Scale't'=436 feel xfl¢ • Il, a4 THE DIFFERENCE IS YOU January 8, 2025 Project#: 2412-R-53181 Mr. Joe Salvato Brazos County 6900 Koppe Bridge Rd College Station, TX 77845 Dear Mr. Salvato Your request for relocating guy wire has been investigated. Your cost to provide this service is$6,224.66. Included in this cost is . The internal wiring serving your structure(if applicable) and the installation of the meter can, weather head, etc. is your responsibility. Please note that this AIC amount is based on the line routing we discussed and is subject to change 90 days from the date of this letter. BTU will furnish the electric meter and meter can to you at no cost. However, you or your electrician must pick up the meter can from the BTU warehouse located at 611 Union Street, Bryan, Texas. Please reference your assigned project number, 2412-R-53181, when obtaining the meter can from the BTU warehouse. Before your job can be scheduled for construction, I need the following items returned to me: AIC invoice and payment with project number referenced on the check, BTU's Information Desk at 205 E. 28th Street is open between the hours of 8AM and 5PM, Monday through Friday excluding City holidays. They will be happy to assist you with accepting your AIC payment and any other requested paperwork. Please use your assigned project number, 2412-R-53181, to identify any correspondence you may have with our office. A copy of the project job print is included. I appreciate the opportunity to answer any questions you may have and to provide you with competitive reliable electric service. Sincerely, Colton Honeycutt Line Designer Office: 979-821-5749 Cell: 979-777-8054 Fax: 979-821-5796 Email: choneycutt©btutilities.com AFFIDAVIT TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE,CHAPTER 171 .—., STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF BRAZOS § •, ., • e` I BEFORE ME,the undersigned authority,on May 8th,2025 personally appeared l:1"i Commissioner Bentley Nettles who being duly sworn,deposes and says: I. That he/she has a substantial interest in a business entity or real property. Official action takenby the , Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas concerning Agenda Item No. 14 of the Court Agenda dated 1VIay 6,2025 described as Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU) cost estimate of$6,224.66 to relocate existing pole and guy wire , would have a special economic effect on that business entity or a special economic effect on the value of the real property,that is distinguishable from the effect on the public. 2. That the substantial interest is(check the following as is appropriate): () a. Ownership of 10 percent or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity or either 10 percent or more or$15,000 or more of the fair market value of the business entity;or () b. Funds received by me from the business entity exceed 10 percent of my gross income for the previous year;or () c. An equitable or legal ownership in real property with a fair market value of$2,500 or more;or () d. A person related in the first degree by either affinity or consanguinity to me has a substantial interest as defined above;or () e. other BTU Board Member . 3. That I will abstain from participation in the matter refe d to i i Item I nless ho e y law Signature % SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this the 8th day of May 2025. „ Notary Public in and fo F,.P � AIJI37tEXLFtiGETT The State of Texas ' , NotaryNotary 3Y3t�9 3 891D2 3 State � My Comm §.February 12,2027 • Filed: 'l / ( N riCE; ,County Clerk ~ C7E BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: and Bridge NUMBER: CC-2025-Utility Permit-Frontier- RoadShirley-5320357 DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Consider and take action on the Frontier Communications utility permit to install 3,800 feet of fiber optic conduits within the right-of-way of Shirley Road. Project also includes road bores of Shirley Road, Bourbon Lane and Whiskey River Road. Site is located in Precinct 2. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Joe Salvato DATE: 04/30/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 Permit allows Frontier to install 3,800 feet of fiber optic conduit within the right-of-way of Shirley Road from Grassbur to Bourbon Lane and includes road bores of Shirley Road, Bourbon Lane and Whiskey River Road. The remaining 2,100 feet of fiber optic conduit must be placed within the Public Utility Easement(PUE), from Bourbon Lane to FM 1179. NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: Department requesting agenda item: Road and Bridge Department impacted by agenda item: Road and Bridge Brief explanation of agenda item and if in current year budget: Frontier will install fiber optic conduits along Shirley Road, project also includes 3 road bores. Brazos County has NO financial responsibility in project. Consequences for failing to approve agenda item: Less customer choice for internet Deadline for agenda item approval: As soon as possible Site of work being performed: Shirley Road from Grassbur Road to FM 1179 ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Utility Permit-Frontier-Shirley Road.pdf Utility Permit-Frontier-Shirley Road-5320327 Backup Material 5/1/25,4:52 PM Item Coversheet r�t E oF'*Tr. ttiQ $ � p q 9Los, BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: and Bridge NUMBER: CC-2025-Utility Permit-Frontier- RoadShirley-5320357 DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Consider and take action on the Frontier Communications utility permit to install 3,800 feet of fiber optic conduits within the right-of-way of Shirley Road. Project also includes road bores of Shirley Road, Bourbon Lane and Whiskey River Road. Site is located in Precinct 2. TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Joe Salvato DATE: 04/30/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 Permit allows Frontier to install 3,800 feet of fiber optic conduit within the right-of-way of Shirley Road from Grassbur to Bourbon Lane and includes road bores of Shirley Road, Bourbon Lane and Whiskey River Road. The remaining 2,100 feet of fiber optic conduit must be placed within the Public Utility Easement(PUE),from Bourbon Lane to FM 1179. NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: Department requesting agenda item: Road and Bridge Department impacted by agenda item: Road and Bridge Brief explanation of agenda item and if in current year budget: Frontier will install fiber optic conduits along Shirley Road, project also includes 3 road bores. Brazos County has NO financial responsibility in project. Consequences for failing to approve agenda item: Less customer choice for internet Deadline for agenda item approval: As soon as possible Site of work being performed: Shirley Road from Grassbur Road to FM 1179 ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Utility Permit-Frontier-Shirley Road.pdf Utility Permit-Frontier-Shirley Road-5320327 Backup Material APPROVED fah-- 3-i CAZ.5-- • Duane Peters ate County Judge https://brazos.novusagenda.com/AgendaWeb/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=30615 111 NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED INSTALLATION AND/OR REPAIRS OF TELEPHONE FACILITIES AND DESIGNATING PLACEMENT OF UTILITY IN COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY TO: THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS Comes now Frontier Communications [company name], hereinafter referred to as "Company" a Texas [state] Corporation, with authority to transact business in Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized representative, and hereby notifies the County Engineer of its intent to lay, construct, maintain, repair and/or operate a telephone facility under, over, across and/or along certain County Roads as shown on drawings and diagrams attached hereto and said location described as follows: Project—5320357/Fiber Shirley Road Frontier proposes to directional bore 5,900 feet (3,800'in ROW and 2,100' PUE) of 1.25-inch X 2 fiber optic conducts along Shirley Road from Grassbur Road to FM 1179. Project consists three (3) road bores: Shirley Road (1); Bourbon Lane (1) and Whiskey River Road (1). The location and description of the proposed installation and appurtenances must be fully shown on detailed drawings attached to this Notification. The Company shall commence actual construction/work in good faith within 60 days from the date of said permit and shall complete said construction /work within 30 working days. (COMPANY MUST FILL IN). If such construction is not begun by the 60th day, Company will be required to provide a new notice. Company declares that prior to filing this application, it has ascertained the location of all existing utilities, both aerial and underground, and the filing of this application is prima facie evidence that the proposed installation will not conflict with any existing utility. A copy of this notice shall be kept at the job site any time work is being performed. In the event of deviation from this notice, the Brazos County Engineer's Office or its designated representative will be notified as soon as practicable. Approval of County Engineer's Office may take as long as two weeks after complete application is received. Failure to notify the County Engineer's Office within 24 hours of beginning construction shall constitute grounds for job shutdown. By signing below, I certify that I am authorized to represent the Company listed below, and that the Company agrees to the conditions/provisions included in this notification. Frontier Communications * Company Name Darrin Albrecht 281-229-0849 Darrin.l.albrecht@ftr,com Devin Gould with Housley Group By: yOUZZ Signature Project Manager—Permits Title 3550 S Bryant Blvd San Angelo,Tx 76903 Address 409-313-3755 Telephone Number dgould@hc-inc.com E-mail ACCEPTANCE OF NOTIFICATION Brazos County offers no objection to the proposed location of the utility in the County right of way as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated April 29.2025 except as noted below: EXCEPTIONS: Permit allows Frontier to install 3,800 feet of fiber optic conduit within the rights-of-way of Shirley Road from Grassbur Road to Bourbon Lane and includes road bores of Shirley, Bourbon Lane and Whiskey River Road. The remaining 2,100 feet of fiber optic conduit must be place within the Public Utility Easement(PUE),from Bourbon Lane to FM 1179. Br-e County Engineer SHEET INDEX: ' I. S RD NOTES Frontier COVER SHEET 2. STANDARD NOTES AND LEGEND 3-14. SITE PLANS COMMUNICATIONS IS. TRENCH BACKFILL AND BORE DETAILS 16. HH 8 FP DETAILS 17. STANDARD TCP Royal Legend Arabians • �/i em &Horse Center _g NORTH ARROW xl c - TW S PERMIT A UNDERGROUND FOOTAGE:5919' N. cc <;! o l ZBJ • *TOY 811 d t5 9fi II g c•p� N..,L` 1 PROJECT LOCATION I--,ti C r_, Sunstrike Optics e f Tucker Construction r•y _ e Wig' le a Andy Cervantez • N. .,' I SHEET RILE: ci Geasst°a" COVER SHEET ga. ,' •\ Gosstur Rd PERMIT# 5320357 ADDRESS: 4 b 1 7B50 SHIRLEY RD,BRYAN.TX Q 77808.USA PERMIT#TELECOM PRINT 1 rss EuT Rd sdu7 Rd BRAZOS COUNTY .e a foy o1/4 SHEIGA HEIGHTS j PAPER SIZE: ARCH B �cr, ��0 G`oym DRAWING SCALE:NTS f r _,,, q u R T9 v 3,Rre CFI t DATE:04-10-2025 SHEET NO.01 OF 17 • '• •e • STANDARD LEGEND & NOTES Frontier COMMUNICATION$ AERIAL a PROPOSED FLOWER POT • A 1 / CENTERLINE __ `�N © � COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE EOGE.OF•PAVEMENT F� �` O ELECTRIC MANHOLE ROAD BASE SOLID LINE FENCE GUARDRAIL ® STORM SEWER MANHOLE e ® _ ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NORTH ARROW RIGHT-OF-WAY — PUBLIC.UTILITY-EASMENT ©[zi COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL SIDEWALK snw E3 ELECTRIC PEDESTAL FORCE MAIN ® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER —]—I-1-1—ti— GAS TiDv'o811 ELECTRIC HANDHOLE PROPOSED BORE �' """ -•- ® -igr FIRE HYDRANT Irr7wCat] yan DITCHES ® WATER VALVE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION `f--Z STREET LIGHT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION COMBINED TJ STREET SIGN COUNTY LINE!CITY LIMITS o e©o 0 1 I: CULVERT L BORE PIT/POTHOLE �--� 1 I' TREE LJ PROPOSED VAULT O PULL POINT11111 (j+ PROPOSED HANDHOLE nrn SHEET TITLE: TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE LEGEND/NOTES ■ EXISTING MANDHOLE y� M] WASTEWATER CLEAN OUT PERMIT# 5320357 EXISTING HANDHOLE ADDRESS: 7860 X ® WATER METER 77E00.USASHIRL EXISTING RD,BRYAN,TX EXISTING POWER POLE PERMIT#TELECOM PRINT e 0 EXISTING FTR POLE e n ANCHOR RAILROAD CRATE G SIGNAL/ BRAZOS COUNTY -+-IE—<- DOWN GUY PAPER SIZE: ARCH B • MIOSPAN CROSS OVER DRAIMNG SCALE-1:40 DATE:04-10-2025 SHEET NO.02 OF 17 MATCH TO SHEET 04 Frontier K OyL COMMUNICATIONS 2k` ! N \\• Oq •"NOTE" t±,, MANTAIN 42"DEPTH Ns 'i / UNDER PAVEMENT AND 111' �, \R�Po� 7:6> DRIVEWAYS AT `=O�� \ \, CROSSING. {�-,.. 0 . �\` 1 .. \� C `t�� NORTH ARROW S; �.• 4 ,S N. tiiR�iy;;;,,:s.,\\ i • ;f *Tova.c.814 ot- eaPithdeft ! /1\ oP / � e =mama PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH \ ``\ \ �I_ r uh--� 780'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL .� ` Op//J r FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT " A \ --- / OW PROJECT BEGINS HERE AT ` EXISTING HH I \ g$iN% AT N 30.723879,W-96.240898 0% L STA:00.00 \' '// \ / /� J (2 9 SHEET TITLE: ' tom; Gip,-- \s�9 \ SITE PLAN ag e a`� I,^ ;s \\ ,�3 PERMIT# 5320357 p \ O - ADDRESS; / OQ J` . . 7050 SHIRLEY RD.BRYAN,TX J; ♦ O - 77005.USA ..G\'/ 'cA I \ ti • PERMITS TELECOM PRINT 0? hP �O%Y �o��' �� o BRAZOS COUNTY *y PAPER SIZE: ARCH B DRAWING SCALE-1:40 DATE•04-10-2025 SHEET NO.03 OF 17 —rt T� MATCH TO SHEET 05 PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL E CO 36"DU DEPTH /,• /- Fron•t ill'" 491'(2)1.25'SDR-11 HOPE CONDUIT PULL / FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT R�� ���YYY / COMMUNICATIONS EXISTING HH -A /' / AT N 30.725545,W-96.240696 / STA:08+00 r ,,,, 4, / *-- , _.,_AN&,- '-���� ,/*/, r // NORTH ARROW o / �f/ oQ /' / l,� , P�, , Tovc+ /, • R- * 811. , s� `,,�� below gam/ 04. �� ,/ 5S/• / / ei' / / (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 35"DEPTH '�' , �'�' ,, "NOTE" 780°(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL r'0, MANTAIN 42"DEPTH FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) 2,', / UNDER PAVEMENT AND DRIVEWAYS AT ;/ 20, CROSSING. ef / / , , SHEET TIME: 7/ �' / SITE PLAN , PERMIT# 5320357 44 '0/ /, ADDRESS: , 7850 SHIRLEY RD.BRYAN,TX - 77808.USA // O� / PERMIT 0 TELECOM PRINT • O / / o�,/ BRAZOS COUNTY !I , , PAPER SIZE: ARCH B / (( / `/ DRAWNG SCALE-1:40 I / DATE:04 10 2025 ,I 11 SHEET NO.04 OF 17 MATCH TO SHEET 03 MATCH TO SHEET 06 (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH-1N \ \ y't �� 1092'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL .e r®iA�«� 1 FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) y'?� i+ O`L ® , 1 +` O �a + COMMUNICATIONS PROPOSED HH(2'X3') v ` \, AT N 30.726805,W-98.240936 O1 1 + \ N STA:12+91 \\ 'y +\ \ + k \ 1 +\\\ \ \ \ �i� \\ ++,+ \ +� ++ �A A \ +, + I \ \ N\ \ \ NORTH ARROW \0 1 • \ .. \ �+ \ \ (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH \\ G 491'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HOPE CONDUIT PULL �'��� \FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) \ \ \ �y � , 's + " ONTE" *TOV'-_� 811i\\v, MANTAIN 42"DEPTH �� \ \ UNDER PAVEMENT AND Maws styli \ '+\ \ \ \ DRIVEWAYS AT � 1aSo +\\ t \ CROSSING. • _10 `+ \ \`, \ \ \\ '\ y + \ ,k \ vv \ L ly \ SHEET TITLE: \l ' SITE PLAN yyi I I) PERMIT# 5320357 " ? i ADDRESS: TWO SHIRLEY RD.BRYAN.TX 11 '1 77606.USA ff PERMIT#TELECOM PRINT g o Q / BRAZOS COUNTY j► I j / PAPER SIZE: ARCH B l f 8 ' !' 1 �� DRAWNG SCALE-1:40 i /; + /f / DATE:04-10-2025 l f r.r_.-.1r. I i SHEET NO.05OF 17 MATCH TO SHEET 04 MATCH TO SHEET 07 i 1 1 `� Frontier" O O _ o -Z �1 � I � f, 7, !I , i COMMUNICATIONS a 1 S .11 \ 1 11 1 N I__ 19' 14' 0_ I 22''1 VA _� • B l li ' 1 NORTH ARROW 11' it in + + , '� i 1 '1 I -NOTE.. I 1 L1 MANTAIN 42'DEPTH b I + 1 UNDER PAVEMENT AND ,I ti DRIVEWAYS AT Iti I t CROSSING. 11 , NI. *Tovat8'r1:.,i \ lk . - - ' - e . Item stills bdigML " a , Ii+ t !1 1 n t4 } I°'1 I �1{ 1 i t t rI 1 11 1 1 1 1` 4 T V 1 , \ 1 + 1l l ` 4 1 4 4 1 I``, 1 t 1 I (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36'DEPTH 1t I \ y ,1 1092'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL 1 i 1 ' FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) t ti , i SHEET TITLE: 1 y i L. y SITE PLAN 1 }1 \ + ,li; PERMIT# 5320357 ` t t l + ADDRE33' • '� 4 ` '�i l 7850 SHIRLEY RD.BRYAN.TX ii 4 'I 7T808,USA ' I 1 PERMIT?!TELECOM PRINT , I: II\ \ i 0, BRAZOS COUNTY ! , O o 0 z 4 1 PAPER SIZE. ARCH B + 0 ' ,1 DRAWNG SCALE•1:40 1 , 1 DATE 04-10-2025 11 \ \ SHEET NO.06 OF 17 MATCH TO SHEET 05 MATCH TO SHEET OB 1 z. r o o .e.. II 1 I Frontier- s I COMMUNICATIONS I I ; C i 11 r t 111. 1 C 1 t lir iii : \ ilis.- .....11 11 1 k,1i1 ��1 1 t NORTH ARROW ,I t —1 1� l -NOTE' MANTAIN 42"DEPTH 11 1 11 . UNDER PAVEMENT AND t 1 1 DRIVEWAYS AT 11 1 1 1 1 1 t , _ CROSSING. 1 � .41 I *Tw'c+g11 (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH �t a f i 1 -` 1092'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL I 1 I En"'e bskal'wag. FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) 1 \ .1 T t l��{{ , ,, I ,- 1 TiI �WI ; I t \ t1 1 5 I i 14 o I Ic; 4 sHEET TITLE: 1 % i �I SITE PLAN t1 1 h l} PERMIT# 5320357 t1 1 w l ADDRESS: 1 S 7550 SHIRLEY RD,BRYAN,Tx { MO,USA ill i 11 ` PERMIT#TELECOM PRINT ,I alI , I• 1 1 ` BRAZOS COUNTY 11'� i 3''-"r.- 22' _ •-19' PAPER SIZE: ARCH B 14'- t•�-:_ 5'. ----, DRAWING SCALE-1:40 �'r O DATE:04-10-2025 {{ 4 `j L_.... L L, . SHEET NO.07 OF17 MATCH TO SHEET 06 MATCH TO SHEET 09 /'7 .' / -• •••a i • y�y /AZ Frontier. Fi/' / COMMUNICATIONS Z� i ?/`1 / PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 38'DEPTH / 575'(2)1,25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL ` FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT / I `lI t PROPOSED HH(2'X3')--., �� AT N 30.730072,W-96.241566 \ / I STA:25+43 1` N. \ "'o,` NORTH ARROW 11 , 2-81,4*; .:\ , 0. ..,. • ,, O.n ' .\`yy ..$)55. , ..NOTE" *TOV'0g i PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH RON, 'S'' `tch , MANTAIN 42"DEPTH 160' 2)1.25"SDR-11 HOPE CONDUIT PULL 12SN, 42, \ UNDER PAVEMENT AND Ihee•Etr WOK ' FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT ' �� dDRIVEWAYS AT CMbeforvvott no t \ t CROSSING. \ q , EXISTING I-IH— �1 1� AT N 30.729783,W-96.241183 t\ t STA:23+83 1 ' ty ` , 1 41 N \1 2 ,, l'i, 1 '°�,�1 F R'ye t SHEET TITLE: t4 SITE PLAN (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH 109212)1.25"SDR-11 HOPE CONDUIT PULL \ PERMIT* 5320357 FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) ` ADDRESS: 1 7050 SHIRLEY RD.BRYAN,TX 1 I 19, 1 - 77800.USA — �"'"-"�j 1 PERMIT 0 TELECOM PRINT 3,-•1{-F"-- 1 1 `t,'y�22'i tii2z, 21,-I BRAZOS COUNTY ).....130 PAPER SIZE: ARCH B I y It I I D MUSSCALE-1:40 0 c5 DATE:04-10-2025 , tt T ? T 1- SHEET NO,08 OF 17 MATCH TO SHEET 07 r / MATCH TO SHEET 10 PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH 1 • .. ' 655'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HOPE CONDUIT PULL f FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT r Frontier !, O O COMMUNICATIONS EXISTING HH`-`, r f I? 4' / / AT N 30.731300,W-96.240439 'x Q 141- j 11 O- N STA:31+17 +i x +r lr r 1 ' ire "f4 ag f�1 /. r 1 -� }1� } / // NORTH ARROW / / /'''' /1/1 ,*,Tov"c 811. /1y, ff f CIO helm vou dig. ,/, / ' (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36'DEPTH , 57V(2)1.25"SOR-11 HOPE CONDUIT PULL 1,t �/ FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) / i "NOTE" f�0 / MANTAIN 42'DEPTH / �� , UNDER PAVEMENT AND // /CI � / DRIVEWAYS AT {_ _ CROSSING. ,/20• /J / SHEET TITLE:, s / SITE PLAN /dam f2S / TP{' PERMIT# 5320357 ri /' ?�, ADD ERO.BRYAN TX �/ f/ SHIRLEYS 77808.USA // / PERMIT#TELECOM PRINT AV o BRAZOS COUNTY // eve / or '/ PAPER SIZE ARCH B Y i/ // Oy, DRAIMNGSCALE-1:40 ' DATE:04-10-2025 // / �' SHEET NO.09 OF 17 1 MATCH TO SHEET 08 Frontier- COMMUNICATIONS N "NOTE" : MANTAIN 42"DEPTH `+'�� UNDER PAVEMENT AND ' z�`i+ DRIVEWAYS AT Vt1` CROSSING. / i_ NORTH ARROW `�. *T0 1 811. jo 4* •. `�.. cow --,;,,,,/.:,,, i,„, -'.?< \ \ 1 \ \ SHEET TITLE: \ SITE PLAN . 7. ss. PERMIT 5320357 (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH ` 655'(2)1.25'SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL ' �O ADDRESS: FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) 7�6�0 SHIRLEYiRL RD.BRYAN.TX �yy.'\'� 1111101,1 � ., PERMIT#TELECOM PRINT d as' \ ° i �'co' BRAZOS COUNTY o s oN \` PAPER SIZE: ARCH B I DRAMS SCALE•1:40 DATE:04-10-2025 1 i // SHEET NO.10OF 17 MATCH TO SHEET 09 MATCH TO SHEET 12 `•:(80€. ."o+. ,� �D�N.:: PROPOSED IN PUE - NO COUNTY Fr nt r- A. APPROv,�L REQUIRED 'N,,,,,, /•_ COMMUNICATIONS ''\'''`w- \ �y x PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE IN PUE 36"DEPTH 1 �3\ / 793'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL FIBER i + THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT t`pr \ --- '. \ *,"'£fir �/1�\ l ``\ \y'40 �� �` a- NORTH ARROW •� fffo \ . \ � ti n / ` \``^� ! L, --' 46. [," „NOTE" \ r ti y /`*' o f O AAANTAIN 42"DEPTH 1 '1' ti t �Op r I �'- UNDER PAVEMENT AND `�\ f, '' o. / 2' DRIVEWAYS AT c- F.11 1^' \� v/9 4 `' O —= CROSSING. ----• t 0 1' oo szy ii.,,,,,,aikfte, \ ,, , ``'\ - --- .:14 4 ' PROPOSED HH(2'X3') AT N 30.732657,W-96.241660 a a ` R '� STA:36+40 STA:50+22 K Ou u OC PROPOSED \ i'ti - HH(2'X31 1 '� BO' a STA.38+40 ``�\ -�25' 24. - 31'— \YYY_+ +S ,T "+' \ -. \ti p TYPICAL ROAD CROSS-SECTION /'- ~'\ \''ti ``\ SHEET TITLE: BOURBON LN PROPOSED BP(TXTX3') AT N 30.732503,W-96.241781 � SITE PLAN STA: 37+72 „...,,,),/ .t 'tiq titi ` ` �° \ `� .PERMIT# 5320357 i a PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 42°DEPTH 1 ` ADDRESS: o Q 4 • 0 68'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL 00 �..,, 1 //// 7850 SHIRLEY RD.BRYAN.TX PROPOSED PROPOSED FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUITki O na06.USA BP13'X3'X31 70' STA:35 40 S. o PERMIT 6 TELECOM PRINT STA:37+72 ` 3' 18' 22' 26' r!y\ `4\• `o f (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE 36"DEPTH ye .\ `c/(,-~y,, BRAZOS COUNTY u• — +r 655'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL 'sl O S. O `_ FIBER THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) -� '1-.,, `TYPICAL ROAD CROSS-SECTION "0,7 ` \ �VZ PAPER SIZE- ARCH B SHIRLEY RD 41,'` I-. DRAWAINGSCALE-1:40 `z g DATE:04-10-2025 SHEET NO.11 OF 17 • e PROPOSED IN PUE - NO COUNTY Frontier COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL REQUIRED I— wus 1\ us . r PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL SORE IN PUE 36'DEPTH _ Ill IU a &_ / 1290'(2)1.25"SDR-1 I HOPE CONDUIT PULL FIBER r�I` .Q vY THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT t 1 � O� i NORTH ARROW O. 4B / "NOTE" MANTAIN 42'DEPTH UNDER PAVEMENT AND O. y 4yy` PROPOSED HH(2'X3')'i O DRIVEWAYS AT \ AT N 30.733984,W-96.243748 _R_ a STA:46+29 I OQ ' CROSSING. � o,`a , _ ` N11411111tioh.._144 -o`ry WOK )(...../yAA y ii ' o ?4 / 14sei a balm ma& 00 �� / .\ tip �� I• ,� �.7 •\ , 4 /a -k / - , .Ro Y. '� �/ (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE IN PUE 36"DEPTH �� 793'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL FIBER \ S'yJ ys7�� THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) SHEET TITLE: '`� ,\,$). `° SITE PLAN PERMIT* 5320357 3' a a `\ `\ -~ ADDRESS: 7850 SHIRLEY RD,BRYAN,TX PROPOSED 0 C tii K STA.45.41 , •` ` ,� 7700S.USA HH(2%91 tiCO PERMIT#TELECOM PRINT STA.48•28 70' �- 22' 24' -24'—� \ v y—' ^-- ——` .r \ wry'^� y BRAZOS COUNTY J ti `\ 6'4 BT I V �C�� 3J PAPER SIZE: ARCH B TYPICAL ROAD CROSS-SECTION WHISKEY RIVER RD ° a` DRAIMNG SCALE-1:40 `\\ 43•D��n� DATE:04 10 2D25 ``QO�,�` �� SHEET NO.12 OF 17 _z' MATCH TO SHEET 11 O �\ ''� , MANTAIN 42"DEPTH Frontier UNDER PAVEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS Ul` DRIVEWAYS AT 2 `\ "a .1, CROSSING._ -. - 44k 'N. 1 ir" hkzt„-,.„-;T ..... ° U ♦ o � � 1 I \ � ;� ` h NORTH ARROW .� °ems \ y (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE IN PUE 36'DEPTH OGy\ , a f4 f "� 1290'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HDPE CONDUIT PULL FIBER N. THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) ^�. r, r a Tti . * ovag'8 ilti. ` te/'� it iraiarsbs \p" - - aR o CiYbi.D °ii\ - �ll �/' Sti` '0,6400.. ".„,. 4.4-,„ ,„,, ,,,,, ..,„,,,c _ ,, ---... ,...,, --4,,_.-7410-„, ,...., ....., , ...„ _ ... -`.. SHEET RULE: \ ` SITE PLAN t�`. F \` ``\ _ PERMIT# 5320357 PROPOSED IN PUE - NO COUNTY -- ' ' c 0 ADDRESS: \ �. "0x00 0 7850 SHIRLEY RD.BRYAN.TX ` \ `+.- F- 77808.VSA APPROVAL REQUIRED \ ` \4 °�Z U PERMITS/TELECOM PRINT , §,:: ,'` .°� .., BRAZOS COUNTY • ' -� ° � '`\-. PAPER SIZE: ARCH B „O� DRAIMNGSCALE-1:40 DATE:04 10 2025 - h �_ z4 SHEET NO.13 OF 17 Frontier O# COMMUNICATIONS ,� / N o ,• a r.lr / so �// — A a8;` ¢o JIe ' NORTH ARROW / f'^^'\c'/ v',1, THIS PORTION SHOWN IN r/ �, i TX DOT PERMIT PROJECT ENDS HERE AT / , ` N. PROPOSED HH W-9 /' AT N 30.735886,W-96,247t 36 STA:59+19 / eras o *T0V9P811 Ah / 9p (PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL BORE IN PUE 36"DEPTH okeivrees Won 0f7� 1290'(2)1.25"SDR-11 HOPE CONDUIT PULL FIBER DM 0 /! /' e `� f1 yob THROUGH PROPOSED CONDUIT) / Cj , e.\ ,,,. �.�1 / J 4q eL`/ / \SiiiR(., S9' . ,* by / / �, ;,�, / "NOTE" �� . • MANTAIN 42"DEPTH ik SHEET TITLE: ' UNDER PAVEMENT AND ` ^% ,' °ay ,9, 8 / ` DRIVEWAYS AT �. p SITE PLAN / CROSSING. PERMIT# 5320357 // 18, '/ \ P'r/C N-- ADDRESS: �� 7550 SEHS9RLEY R0.BRYAH,TX �� •• •. O. ``\ ''',.� 77606,USA Q / ���, ` PERMIT#TELECOM PRINT " LI • . / PROPOSED IN PUE - NO COUNTY %hob. � ' BIOS COUNTY o�/� APPROVAL REQUIRED �• �` PAPER SIZE: ARCHB r, I-. DRAIAINGSCALE-1:40 ` DATE:04-10-2025 \�2 SHEET NO.14 OF 17 I ALMA SOD BORE DETAIL (PAVEMENT) e rp r/�CELL FIBER W.OI CELL FIEER WLCN Frontier As FEAT 64 I //f/ 1 nEr 8D4 1 /,StiEa,I6mD, COMMUNICATIONS I y TCH EIIISTIND Tt:H ENISrt Nc top SOIL DEPTH ,111/4 FLI.ARc - I STEN I4,0 1 AITEIUR,io800T ��r B/CRrle.� �'• EAgAN.MENT ITEN 132 /ITEM a011 ITT e 1IFINALI , - i - 60H NORTH ARROW 12 I BACRi III fA.ST FO.LO?II.ITI � STANDARDS MAT ILLO� STALOANDS CL'UTILITY Ir' STANDARDS OF UT ICI TT 0 APPLYING PM HMI/ APPLY INC FOR PT-MDT 0 MO hilkapalmudtv. TRENCH DETAIL I NON PAVEMENT 1 TRENCH DETAIL < NON PAVEtENT > DIRECTIONAL BORE TO PLACE G ID' FROM CURD/OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT )10' FROM CIS/OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT (2)1.2511 HDPE PIPE NOTES. .Tilt 121174L46,1144 11 41121 w C.MI TO 114.2441144.1.1 .IR w'0414rP Ux.'442/04.et IR R tsWup VW ICI ICI 1 11q"cr }41.;11.1—J sca.cers+�rI t[4� Ili d I/,,; _L—�;r l y{I x- 41414 NU fult.l.re. . 'V+.�L,11.4.K k-;s P rl.`I 4 Ir. I..M r 1 •011Lr ; _ �.',V,,1PL L,Lt•t.rW 1?L1 Dt """'"'.n;,.1 .. Y:do t' ,r 1.Ip 1,41 ey 1 w�L.c b„' oflrrnn,-J r1.1sa ufti a �• a1 m1x fu+.el rxamr+ 1.L.,. Tu. ,.9�.1•r• ,rblew rr 1I•r.H1L;.....Laces I�1.crs•I w tr1:1144 am• _._' nrel+. . s ro u.' ..I. 44=Mt s lt141 111.4z11 A 4 vow.— .,�1c.L.14LI 1w, SHEET TITLE: .Hies.,UC•L111w Jo. ....n L Ic L.-» I .9n,flit 'O1L•a111O11a4 too a TRENCH BACKFILL AND t1G,]a :Ixsa.1•.>m cut tea, f•..d:Y�pK�- - 744a KL.» � a,.1 I• '1 R 1 1 ncfp 1m, BORE DETAILS gg rcon.Alto R — •�` art'+ " •e + +t4. PERMIT# 5320357 j e¢ I __ 1_ , =' e 00. ADDRESS �� -- -rn �— * ,1 r r4 TTSSO 1SOS.HIRLEYRD.BRYAN,TX t' -..-..'7;-:. v ! . TT.OE.USA jj a PERMIT IS TELECOM PRINT I FEITES! izt,. .i. r:s.vH6�� L'°" ao 1.UMITS OF HMA FINAL TRENCH BAC.FILL sT1TN PAVED Sl6iTACE DETAIL SURFACE SHALL BE AS BRAZOS COUNTY _pm TRENCHES EQUAL OR LESS THAN 6• .TAIL TRENCH BUCFILL EIT PAVE IMAM SURFACE DETAIL SHOWN ON PLANS BUT NOT IF LESS THAN 2'MIN, PAPER SIZE' ARCH B DRAWING SCALE HORZ: NTS VERT:NTS SHEET NO.15 OF 17 17" X 30" X 26°' HANDHOLE DETAILS 3' X 3' HANDHOLE DETAILS ••.. a �3• Frontier\yam COMMUNICATIONS 11112,0.122 3- +f2-•r Mu MT �'� —7I- ., am m AM Gale. Mooed Cover I ileac Cover 1 O� Weight — 560 Lbs. Jr, �y a�+ s + iiiMenelt 6 4e 3 �8" Elevation 4. ,� r11 1 IZ �2 —19 1/2" 4 f; i ii NORTH ARROW Ng ./ , \ III exxurt- �-�• 2 'r-^�. BIDY with III`, tJ a=EIxM 27 _ �•• Frasna I N [�kY I I CO •VC x•a/•- \ 4F—f( Weight - 2,325 Lbs. (.�y I z GM t0 N Li 4• EN 2 TOM Plostic Pull Iron pm as EASE Sump CS!Won Weight — 2,000 Lbs. 24"X 36" X 26" HANDHOLE DETAILS \`, . ...i- ...122222081. SWAM +/2.••'MAL SOT ION IX A TYPICAL FLOWER POT BOX DETAIL SHEET TITLE: . HH&FP DETAILS 6� 26 o i PERMIT# 5320357 2 \ :i'9J r�` ADDRESS: iii 7858 SHIRL,EY RO,BRYAN.T% iw T7808.USAPERMIT E TELECOM PRINT ''VI +rxpig°'rM..+am `` N 61fvtLO5 COU1\1 1.` I'. 4 \ `� sass=:I+an PAPER Si2E: ARCH 8 !ACC COVEN m1.202eaawsasiir ornxnoEemur DRAWING SCALE-NSS -- 02221,UP - 52420122.002 'WApE""a DUX SHEET NO.16 OF 17 urtEZOR CUENSBONS Frontier GQMMUNICATION$ N .scow. •1111:1/!! LEGEND oprevno SW D IM .0•a Mr •' 'd 0 .7•area0m •• pafa1111ro o.vrue In . Sm•co NIw pp +• � I p3•+ D� DM Y•ofy pk YMlan. ® ATtwau.°r.laAn pa I iIIDAD(eaq .•i..' �RME UM . ® •rollx YArir.O qA a2rTaf.QnM10a6D°. S .n. A «O.i [sw rod 2L� "� �re.ngw arrw WQa w.w0.slml LKKT n1-z V `V' e•z z.• �A4R'B + �q]a•10 A. Pon Trotfra row 6 2 a s _ TO ST1IP iila1a4l I t{: TO. 1101d Lir. 1 I% , SA 1404- 1T a fln0 T190.ot.e�wa 1• .Y_ rI.TO llr� 0N®111Ni I II.No.2aA 1001rao. WO.N T.Oy.a eta®•ro �- $ • MIN faala Taper L..0.1. o., Wont° la' La.r..tll.nl 61an :� '�1F^e - + / �"° •• Won 2p4°°:a oar T....o1..aa. NORTH ARROW Ri-Pm B • 10• I• .2' ma of o Ob.Ode. ••• S-Y e•x T6• .Y20.7 ` N50 lOS ISO' r0.r Tope. i5n 11pT 1. f1tf° •/•[.6' SD ] 150. 16S' 100' SO' 60' 120' 50' 200' ®® 3 R 2 / i5 L. 205• 225• 243, 40' 0' NO' 120' 250' k t` aYlp]•OP 20• S XXX FEET fi , .0 265' i55• )20'' 40' 10' NO' 153' 305' 2 .Omlro en.m,.....---------1:_ blt•2a • / W aD 'as 450• 415• S.0' 45' 50' 320• 195• 360' F. Si 24'R le•A e / IRDAD1f 1 50 SOW DOW 600' SO' 100' 400' 240' 425' (fb -'•..- [.d.n on , q�i 24• 6�L•06 600'650. 660' 720' 60' 120' 610' 600• e50• S10• OQ r1 OTOTegy 6S 550' TIS. 700' GS' 120' T00' 410• 6.3' s4i %'� / i� TOO' no,140• TO' 1a0' 600' .13• T50• ' I llnloo4 *TuU4O/� �•. �TYIY Of.i be T5. 150'-e]S' S00' TS' 150' 9N' SAD' e20' M (x�11 rY �<� ■ SiC O #[anv.Mlna. no.* Only - IG'...• 1.ne0r0rY • 0,mar I.tondl no..only reuq.0 01f. �f �' 2a'Stop Line L-LeroM of Mown./•..1O.n of OrrNt1PT1 S•PNt.d S0ad110.f -Ja Moe wt.zlA } TYPICAL.USAGE i IETSFS(ke. Leo•Aeve.. ti I O..Iw. „ - - - - -- - bye 5lom.VMIOI♦rl In • 1 as- 20'�pw[1R1 kO.IL[ WU SKID TUBA TpTrll•DI.TC LOA 1C1M TW and DIG.Inla..l.y B--- 01•11m STATIbWT TON 4>N10•.•T tT.TTO••r k r•.a INA rl aMiro. owrl lMlro or..rap. Iic• • 1 I p llpnt•.15N Iw..a 6 n • 1rr mo'! GENERAL ROTES yga I I.Slop afloat.to.ION•1.r.LMK pro a00111]0. gby ® i 2.All batter man.dos-..lltutraton.r.R1011K0............5.4M111.1r.3L..n.p.1 e Sj (16a 51.Ooo.VMlal. 04'on m111.a w.woos ow.,In 1M Alen.as-far~In.101ntmm Ilan Wan aosmN O RI.2 .Itn TVA and U 1.II..4 1r•s-. 4 ``\\ S.Ur 0f5o.110.It1'A6[D TO 0.'.•In.b N Imtalla mina n•[1M•.'01R WAR 09� N.1aa•0020• •• D J QIQ'iQ ri0Otlnaa'•53y 1 e,s, L•o.o10i ST'ram.but 0•am.r.Ipgxlry.tnei On voirrolro6 f aOW Iro M to.lap- • 110401n0. .I.moors nwld w 1N•..1r CNlw a on..4I100 N Oa0Naaf IM to control.rN11a y • �. TO i l r-11.q., •- 6.Lord.N writ soma arum N owed a.t.ability or flapper.In o..•Nma. I.9�i Rl•Pd. trot.BIm1.•. 8.A SRka.Vnlcl.sl R.a 1W ern1io w moo ate In It 011464 pwllia0d b 10 140.01 $e. T.mamr •-r TRAft'K .e•2 r.• I5N roil.6 0 TI ' In ob•re•N 1h ova N or.•oav old.,00.aM1T Nfaflro Ow p rtapaw Co a0111,N SF`= IS.IO l.ln. ISw fen 11 •s: tm sra Iv swum o.no l'1 groom our rose o ram 121400DansItlern r4Wire TM Traffic control % Y' 15N•af•aA M�^+ • To Twain In p16».TAI T barlea0.a a cols-a rod1121ro Ade..ay a w&0.Iry1p gar IN 9.ot. V001o10 a9 1D. A St . 0•> 7..Iea111010 0901 7r.I0IN.IM 1Wa.0 a wsifnr.0a off m pond arfaa.nod TO Ins.Ord. I '• bvlosa at - ..'i.e' In afar to..teen Grids-la k Too.. Ma'wooing • low a, YIR TCP 12-201 I © I FEET 24-2 I i Co.or In -'8 2. a L•'A a 110•I-]'114C•I•ttrN/la.m.rsl•or p 1.Ird M aalal•.IT appr h..M MN a01019. IOP pvnl.,. alai....la protect,In 1117 1 a.m.00..i0a.er0k110 a m la err 40en am r01t ally 01.IRI N•22•/- fIaltlD a.O.taa 1n r.1el m...,rad...11n Ism Tem 2m0 AM.0..q0•Wotd N.•1 0 If•0n•00 fad. iIY10iI0nitl�e/.e y�- 1.111T.I-lc••f1C10 10=DIA u/m.01n TWIN°lama a a Tls'prta.o I D.•Inlo e at nlnf mntiro mlpr. SHEET T11LE: I • k 1 'OP VL' TCP 12�' STANDARD TCP f0-010. ed. _ y 481 note.2l♦ 10.C10NI121ro enlw.m Ow caner I Iw.ay N ptttN awn a pilot pro Is lemlp 1rafllo•tl 1 a - 211•Stop Lino aproad to IT*rrolaa. 1SN Mole 2T A I . 11.1f 1.ark spew 1s Iwa.NKr a ntrI2a.01 a..M loll arm,me eWf0r A.m.00*41 ould N .17, c•zo-•D .17. /� I.0.wa In der TC NIM01n MAIM.Ipt al•ta.•to myfla•MT w••I..N.f.•pN.11101ea PERMIT# 5320357 V 1 4 . .o'11.a• V I f1!' "'6i WC 15a rm1.dotal. I2.f fopptra•0010 w 2.'S1atLLp Nal.To control.raffia Plop a0m1a N 11•Ita To ADDRESS: �D { OaOy.I t0l00lam. 1 ( 1 • MIT brt0�•6- T+)50 SHIRLEY RD,BRYAN.TX I 1 .. I 4 .I 77308.USA. O •2 24• I •• •♦ • - . i�P T�.t/4,arrADPaTaca�nrdtla PERMIT TELECOM PRINT OW . cii00 I , TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 40.2 A' 120-2 - •AU ONE-LANE TWO-WAY R/L% S C 1 1 Y IFlow •e•2 2a• .Y•O• SRAZCS VOUNT 1 S.no.Il If lap- TRAFFIC CONTROL TCP (2-2o) TCP 12-2b1 SA mb 11 2-LANE ROADWAY WITHOUT PAVED SHOULDERS 2-LANE ROADWAY WITHOUT PAVED SHOULDERS TCP(2-2)-IB PAPER SIZE: ARCH B ONE LANE TWO-WAY ONE LANE TWO-WAY '000'o.00 1.- la' DRAIMNG SCALE 1D.•al aro...ws �m . I HORZ: H-NIA -- CONTROL WITH YIELD SIGNS CONTROL WITH FLAGGERS .. ,,e r.•""^ (Less then 2000 ADT - See Note 9) lit 4.1 �II o I'•"'',,), VERT:V•NIA "_' SHEET NO.17 OF 17 BRAZOS COUNTY ROADWAY SAFETY AND ROAD PRESERVATION STANDARDS FOR WORK CONDUCTED IN BRAZOS COUNTY RIGHTS OF WAY A. General Requirements . Adequate drainage shall be maintained in ditches at all times. 2. Permittee will use best management practices("BMP")(EPA and TCEQ both provide lists of examples of BMPs)to minimize erosion and sedimentation resulting from the proposed installation. 3. The permittee shall take precautions to avoid damage to property. All County Right of Way and property shall be restored to its original condition,as far as practical, in the opinion of the County Engineer Or appointed representative. 4. The construction and maintenance of such utility shall not interfere with the property or rights of a prior occupant. 5. Permittee shall not interfere with other utilities located in the right of way. In the event damages occur, permittee will be liable to the County or other utilities running through the right of way. 6. County Engineer shall determine whether or not permittee's plans shall inconvenience the public. If it is determined that inconvenience to the public exists,then the County Engineer will decide whether such project will be allowed or if an alternative exists so as not to inconvenience the public. B. Safety Regrriremeeals I. Proper traffic control measures must be put in place prior to beginning work and remain in place during the duration of the job. All traffic control measures must follow the Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices(TMUTCD). See Traffic Control Requirements below. 2. During construction,all safety regulations of the Texas Department of Transportation shall be observed. 3. Perm ittee must take such precautions and measures, including placing and displaying safety devices, as may be necessary, in order to safely conduct the public through the project area. Company shall provide flagmen,signs, signals or devices necessary to provide complete safety to the public. 4. Adequate provisions must be made to cause minimum inconveniences to traffic and adjacent property owners. 5. No cable,conduit and/or pole line shall be laid, constructed, maintained and/or repaired so as to constitute a danger or hazard of any kind to persons or vehicles using such road. Any poles placed in the Right of Way for future installation shall be placed at the back of the Right of Way. Exceptions may be approved by the County Engineer. C Traffic Control Plan 1 A traffic control plan, pursuant to the TMUTCD or Engineered Traffic Control Plan must be provided for the following; a. Any construction (i.e. pit,excavation, hole) left open over night, requires specific nighttime traffic control measures pursuant to the TMUTCD; b. lfconstruction is within ten (10) feet of the roadway; or c. Any work performed in the road right-of-way; 2. Plan must be attached to the permit and kept at the job site any time work is being performed 3. Plan must set forth the lime of completion for the job. D. Design Standards 1, All overhead installations shall conform to clearance standards of the Texas Department of Transportation and the pole be placed in the designated area for power specified as set forth in the Texas Utilities Code, Section 181.045. 2. All pole installation(including lighting)shall be placed at the backside of the Right of Way to ensure safety to the public. Any pole placed in violation ol'this requirement will be required to be moved to the appropriate location at the company's expense. Exceptions may be approved by the County Engineer. 3. All underground installations shall (these are minimum depths--utility may place deeper): a. be placed at a minimum depth of forty-eight(48) inches below the top of the pavement; h. be at least thirty-six(36)inches below ditch flow line when installation is within the area measured from top of bank to top of bank; c. be at least forty-eight (48) inches below ditch flow line if low pressure gas or petroleum lines. For high pressure gas and petroleum lines, see High Pressure Pipelines requirements listed below; d. not be closer than ten (10) feet from the edge of pavement. Exceptions may apply in rights of way of less than 60'. 4. Water Lines: All water lines must be a minimum 36-inches below the ditch flow line and cased. Waterlines shall be cased if crossing under the roadway. 5. Utilities in all new developments that have 60 feet or greater of right of way shall be installed within designated locations based upon the type of utility. The locations shall be as follows: (measured from back of right-of-way). Power—0-2 feet, nominally I' Phone--2-4 feel, nominally 3' Gas—4-6 feet,nominally 5' Cable--6-8 feet, nominally 7' 6. Utilities with less than 60 feet right-of-way in all new developments shall install the utility in a similar manner as referenced in No. 3 above, however,the County Engineer or its designated representative will provide final approval of'each utility location. '7. The length of any trench to be opened in advance of the pipe, conduit or ducts may not be longer than 400' ii'left open over night or unattended. 8. Crossings under a county road shall: a. be bored or jacked. ABSOLUTELY NO OPEN GU I S 1VM Tl LIN COUNTY ROAD PAVEMENT; b. be pressure grouted for the full length of the crossing lithe annular space between pipe and casing and soil exceeds one(1) inch. Brazos County must be given 24 hours notice of pressure grouting operations and have the opportunity to have an inspector on site to observe pressure grouting operations; c. TxDOT Standard Specification item 476 shall be followed for all boring,jacking, tunneling and joints. 9. Bore Pits a. no pits shall remain open longer than 2 days; b. all pits shall have proper traffic control measures in place. See Traffic Cor:trol Plan listed above. c. pits shall NOT be located within ten(10) feet from the edge of pavement without prior approval from the County Engineer or his representative; d. when pits are to remain open for more than 8 hours,due diligence will be used in protecting the spoil pile to prevent drainage problems; e. based upon soil conditions,the County Engineer or his representative may require shoring to protect pavement integrity; f. based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require pits be placed further from the edge arrow]. 10. Any installation within ten(10) feet of edge of pavement shall meet the following: a. location must be approved by the County Engineer or his representative b. backfilled with cement stabilized material. c. based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require shoring to protect pavement integrity. d. All excess water and mud shall be removed from the trench prior to backfilling. Any backfill placed during a rainy period or at other times where excess water cannot be prevented front entering the trench will be considered TEMPORARY and shall be replaced with PERMANENT cement stabilized material as soon as weather permits; e. All disturbed base and pavement materials shall be removed and restored to the satisfaction of the County Engineer or his representatives. f. No side or lateral tamping to fill voids under the base and pavement materials is allowed. 11. Company must be careful to not jeopardize the slope or integrity of the shoulder of the road. In the event Company damages the slope, shoulder or any other portion of the right-of-way,Company will be responsible for repairing the damage and replacing the right-of-way to the condition it was prior to commencing construction. 12. Operation of construction and/or maintenance equipment on the traveled surface of any improved County road will not be permitted,except in an instance whereby the laying,construction,maintenance and/or repair of cables, conduits and/or pole lines cannot be accomplished by any other method and in this event all such equipment shall be of the rubber tire variety.Appropriate traffic control shall be provided meeting TM UTCD requirements. 13. In the event said construction and/or maintenance and/or repair requires Company to remove,cut or jeopardize any section of the road(asphalt, cement,road base, etc),Company will be required to provide a performance bond or letter of credit securing necessary repairs. Said bond amount will be determined by the County Engineer. 14. The applicant shall submit a letter of"No Objection" from the Army Corps of Engineers for all designated wetlands and environmentally sensitive lands. E. Emergency work 1. In the event Company is required to perform emergency services, that requires excavation in a County Right of Way, and unable to notify the County Engineer prior to conducting emergency repairs,Company shall notify County Engineer within 2,1 hours of beginning construction/repairs.This will allow the County Engineer and Road& Bridge Office an opportunity to inspect the site to ensure the integrity of the County Right of Way and traffic safety controls used F. Repairs to existing facilities I. Maintenance and/or repair to existing cables,conduits, and/or pole lines which require disturbance of the soil, shall not be performed until plans describing such maintenance and/or repair have been approved by the County Engineer or designated representative and a permit has been obtained. G. Relocation of utilities: 1. When and if the County Engineer determines that it is necessary for the construction, repair, improvement, alteration or relocation of all or any portion of said road,any or all poles, wires, pipes, cables or other facilities and appurtenances authorized hereunder, shall be removed from said road, or reset or relocated thereon,as required by the County Engineer within a reasonable time as determined by the County Engineer and Utility Company,and at the expense of the Utility Company. ILL High Pressure Pipelines I. All utility Permits for high pressure pipelines(generally 60 PSI or greater), whether pertaining to controlled access or non-controlled access installations, should contain the following additional information in the description of the permit. -diameter -wall thickness -material specification -minimum yield strength -maximum operation pressure of the pipeline 2. With the exception of the maximum operation pressure of the pipeline, this information is to be supplied for both the carrier pipe and the casing. 3. Assurance must also be given that the installation material and design meet the minimum Federal Safety Standards for Liquid and Gas Pipe Lines. Assurance must be provided on company letterhead and signed by an authorized representative of the company. 4. Petroleum Pipelines: Depth Type of Pipeline (below deepest ditch grade) Special Requirements Encased Pipe Less than 10' Must be covered with concrete pad at least 36"deep Encased Pipe Greater than 10' No concrete pad required Non-Cased Pipe Less than 10' Must be covered with concrete pad at least 448"deep Non-Cased Pipe Greater than 10' No concrete pad required The Concrete pad shall be minimum of 3" thick and width shall be pipe diameter plus 18" minimum. 5. Under no circumstances will a pipeline be installed parallel to a County Road within the Right-of- Way.Transmission lines have been determined to be petroleum pipelines(which includes natural gas lines)and shall not be parallel to a County Road. 6. Natural Gas Distribution is a line that serves the final customer. y qT P, O f •`,. fill ;.; t•r'G' " 'L�r% BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: Approval of the Treasurer's Report for February 2025. TO: Commissioners Court DATE: 05/01/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 ACTION REQUESTED OR Approval ALTERNATIVES: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Treasurer s Report Approval February 2025.pdf Treasurer Report Approval Backup Material February 2025 Treasurer Report.pdf Treasurers Report for February 2025 Backup Material The State of Texas, County of BRAZOS We. the undersigned, as County Commissioners within and for Brazos County, and the Honorable Duane Peters, County Judge of Brazos County, constituting the entire Commissioners' Court of Brazos County, during a regular meeting of said Court have examined the foregoing report and have caused an order to be entered upon the Minutes of the Commissioners' Court of Brazos County approving said Report as presented and submitted as true and correct by Cristian Villarreal. Treasurer of Brazos County, as provided for in the Revised Statutes of the State of Texas. (Texas Local Government Code. 114.026) Witness my hand this L. day of A.D. 2025 Karen McQueen At County Clerk, County of BRAZO , State of Texas Examined and approved in open Commissioners' Court this 6., day of 2025. Duane Peters, CountiJudge /OP 7/7 Bentley Nett!'s missioner Precinct#I Chuck Konderla, Commissioner Precinct#2 Fred Brown, Commissioner Precinct#3 Wanda J. Watso , mmissioner Precinct#4 Treasurer's Report for the MONTH FEBRUARY 2025 FEBRUARY 2025 TREASURER'S REPORT FUND NUMBER&NAME CASH BALANCE INCOMING INVESTED SUB-TOTAL DISBURSED CASH BALANCE INVESTED CK.ACCT.BAL. 1/31/2025 INTEREST 2/28/2025 2/28/2025 0100-GENERAL FUND 218,216,929.05 27,761,159.40 464,640.41 246,442,728.86 10,578,186.68 235,864,542.18 146,847,670.38 89,016,871.80 1100-HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX 7,767,355.47 322,870.37 8,090,225.84 320,982.03 7,769,243.81 7,769,243.81 1200-STATE LATERAL ROAD 132,193.49 467.38 132,660.87 - 132,660.87 132,660.87 1300-UNCLAIMED FUNDS 514,163.20 14,529.94 528,693.14 - 528,693.14 528,693.14 1500-LAW LIBRARY 198,151.18 9,321.08 207,472.26 6,361.89 201,110.37 201,110.37 1800-LEOSE FUND 79,549.54 19,241.25 98,790.79 - 98,790.79 98,790.79 1900-COUNTY RECORDS MANAGEMENT 713,535.78 2,552.76 716,088.54 - 716,088.54 716,088.54 2000-COUNTY CLERK MGMT.FUND 1,341,527.30 28,673.08 1,370,200.38 15,402.59 1,354,797.79 1,354,797.79 2001-COUNTY CLERK ARCHIVAL FUND 1,599,408.22 28,404.83 1,627,813.05 80.82 1,627,732.23 1,627,732.23 2200-COURTHOUSE SECURITY FUND 191,159.34 8,389.87 199,549.21 684.80 198,864.41 198,864.41 2201-JUSTICE COURT SECURITY FUND 273,558.09 3,717.37 277,275.46 - 277,275.46 277,275.46 2300-DISTRICT CLERK MANAGEMENT FUND 333,102.97 11,814.99 344,917.96 6,087.11 338,830.85 338,830.85 2301-DISTRICT CLERK ARCHIVAL FUND 1,633.97 35.78 1,669.75 - 1,669.75 1,669.75 2400-JUSTICE @ PEACE-TECHNOLOGY FUND 81,080.39 2,635.50 83,715.89 43.33 83,672.56 83,672.56 2401-CO.&DIST.COURT TECHNOLOGY FUND 139,446.99 1,185.29 140,632.28 - 140,632.28 140,632.28 2500-SPECIAL FORFEITURE FUND 79,872.98 282.40 80,155.38 - 80,155.38 80,155.38 2600-D/A HOT CHECK COLLECT FEES 5,502.27 19.45 5,521.72 - 5,521.72 5,521.72 2700-BAIL BOND BOARD FEES 116,677.65 412.52 117,090.17 - 117,090.17 117,090.17 2900-VIT INTEREST FUND 407,070.87 5,812.58 412,883.45 - 412,883.45 - 412,883.45 3000-COUNTY GRANTS (429,151.43) 142,674.01 (286,477.42) 406,192.82 (692,670.24) (692,670.24) 3100-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 20,345,376.45 - 63,594.54 20,408,970.99 982,820.68 19,426,150.31 17,486,017.88 1,940,132.43 3200-SB 22 2023 RURAL 924,811.50 3,269.74 928,081.24 41,364.33 886,716.91 886,716.91 3400-D/A CRIME FUND 196,744.08 5,656.35 202,400.43 18,550.67 183,849.76 183,849.76 3500-PRIMARY ELECTION SERVICES 47,916.19 11,537.67 59,453.86 221.55 59,232.31 59,232.31 3901-BC HOUSING FINANCE CORP 522,696.05 1,848.03 524,544.08 - 524,544.08 524,544.08 4320-CO 2020 4,772,438.48 1,892.38 13,826.58 4,788,157.44 232,940.60 4,555,216.84 4,017,882.72 537,334.12 4323-ON SYSTEM ROAD BOND-TXDOT 14,140,854.32 3,473.59 45,437.71 14,189,765.62 210,983.97 13,978,781.65 13,203,824.06 774,957.59 43231-OFF SYSTEM ROAD BOND 6,141,781.49 4,676.89 16,640.63 6,163,099.01 - 6,163,099.01 4,835,615.71 1,327,483.30 43232-2023 CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATIONS 10,679,882.28 4,163.15 32,813.05 10,716,858.48 - 10,716,858.48 9,535,194.18 1,181,664.30 4500-GEN.PERMANENT IMPV. 17,325,290.23 - 17,325,290.23 62,556.87 17,262,733.36 17,262,733.36 5000-HEALTH&LIFE INSURANCE 14,861,464.12 2,172,268.23 17,033,732.35 2,648,977.84 14,384,754.51 14,384,754.51 5800-COUNTY ATTORNEY OPERATING FUND 69,619.35 30.00 69,649.35 - 69,649.35 69,649.35 6000-PAYROLL 1,881,821.64 6,667,686.56 8,549,508.20 6,646,402.47 1,903,105.73 1,903,105.73 9100-HEALTH DEPARTMENT 3,546,115.03 431,418.39 3,977,533.42 314,936.45 3,662,596.97 3,662,596.97 9300-REGIONAL MOBILITY AUTHORITY 48,358.84 170.98 48,529.82 3,744.00 44,785.82 44,785.82 9700-COMMUNITY SUPERVISION 1,238,369.08 241,995.18 1,480,364.26 375,120.38 1,105,243.88 1,105,243.88 TTL.OF ACCTS.IN POOL 328,506,306.45 37,914,286.99 636,952.92 367,057,546.36 22,872,641.88 344,184,904.48 195,926,204.93 148,258,699.55 1600-LOCAL PROVIDER PARTICIPATION 32,237,603.31 136,934.51 32,374,537.82 5,099,494.19 27,275,043.63 27,275,043.63 4100-GEN.OBLIG.DEBT SVC. 13,694,138.61 2,187,902.70 13,931.56 15,895,972.87 889,000.00 15,006,972.87 4,048,393.92 10,958,578.95 TOTAL 374,438,048.37 40,239,124.20 650,884.48 415,328,057.05 28,861,136.07 386,466,920.98 199,974,598.85 186,492,322.13 This report is submitted as true and correct to Commissioners Court by Cristian T.Villarreal,Brazos County Treasurer,on May 6,2025. '.C1 ,�,-r,Pam; ®.y Ga.i e•Y• BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Budget Office NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: • FY 24/25 Budget Amendments 29.01 -29.06 TO: Commissioners Court FROM: Nina Payne DATE: 05/01/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 ACTION REQUESTED OR Request approval. ALTERNATIVES: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type 29 Coversheet.pdf FY 25 Coversheet 29.01 -29.06 Cover Memo 29.01 - 29.06.pdf FY 25 Budget Amendments 29.01 -29.06 Budget Amendment BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS BUDGET AIMIENDMENT(S) FOR THE 2024-2025 BUDGET YEAR NO. 24/25 29.01 —29.06 On this the 6th day of May 2025 at a regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court, the following members were present: A. Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding B. Bentley Nettles,Commissioner, Precinct 1 C. Chuck Konderla, Commissioner, Precinct 2 D. Fred Brown,Commissioner,Precinct 3 E. Wanda Watson,Commissioner,Precinct 4 F. Karen McQueen, County Clerk The following proceedings were held: THAT WHEREAS, on the 6th day of May 2025 the Court heard and approved a budget amendment(s) for the 2024-2025 budget year for Brazos County,Texas; and WHEREAS,expenditure is necessary due to the necessity to meet unusual and unforeseen conditions which could not be reasonably included in the original budget adopted 10 September 2024, the following amendment(s)to the original budget are hereby authorized,as described on the attached page(s). ADOPTED AND APPROVED this the 6th day of May 2025. THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS. —,_. By: Duane Peters, County Judge Original: County Clerk's Office and Attached to the original budget BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No.24/25-29.01 5/6/2025 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE Health and Life Insurance Group Insurance- Fund Administration Contingency Expenditure 2,000.00 Health and Lite Insurance Group Insurance- Fund Administration Supplies and Other Charges Expenditure 2.000.00 Health and life Insurance Fund Reallocation of funds to the correct account to cover bank service charges for the remainder of fiscal year 2025 within the Fund 50000-Health and Life Insurance Fund. SAM Date: 4/28/2025 County Judge.Approval D e For Oracle Entry Only FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 50000 64005000 61130000 (2,000.00) 50000 64005000 60020000 2.000.00 BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No.24/25-29.02 5/6/2025 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE General Fund Contingency Contingency Expenditure 75,000.00 General Fund Jail Medical Services Professional Services Expenditure 75,000.00 General Fund Reallocation of funds to the correct account to cover the cost of short tenn professional staffing in Jail-Medical.Currently,there are several open positions for nursing staff with Texas Board of Nursing Licensure,like Registered Nurse and Licensed Vocation Nurse.The funding will help cover two(2)Registered Nurses for a night shift,40 hours per week,for 13 weeks.The current contract for Short Tenn Professional Staffing was approved by Cot er's Court on February 11,2025. SAM CitsaA--•- V(It'LDate: 4/28/2025 County Judge Approval • For Oracle Entry Only FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 01000 11001500 61130000 (75,000.00) 01000 28003000 72590000 75,000.00 BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No.24/25-29.03 5/6/2025 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE Road&Bridge- General Fund Administration Repairs and Maintenance Expenditure 2,000.00 Road&Bridge- General Fund Administration Supplies and Other Charges Expenditure 2,000.00 General Fund Reallocation of funds to the correct accounts to help fund utility expenditures for the rest of the fiscal year. • SAM Date: 4/28/2025 County Judge Approval Date For Oracle Entry Only FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 01000 56001000 65050000 (2.000.00) 01000 56001000 61880000 2,000.00 BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No.24/25-29.04 5/6/2025 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE Road&Bridge- General Fund Administration Repairs and Maintenance Expenditure 1,200.00 General Fund Environmental Protection Supplies and Other Charges Expenditure 1,200.00 General Fund Reallocation of funds to the correct accounts to help fund utility expenditures for the rest of the fiscal year.Road&Bridge handles accounts in both the R&B- Administration budget and Environmental Protection budget. SAM �L2 i� Date: 4/28/2025 County Judge Approval to For Oracle Entry Only _ FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 01000 56001000 65050000 (1,200.00) 01000 56005000 61880000 1,200.00 BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No.24/25-29.05 5/6/2025 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE 2020 Certificates of Obligation R&B Renovations Capital Outlay Expenditure 684,862.40 2020 Certificates of Obligation Road Reconstruction Capital Outlay Expenditure 684,862.40 2020 Certificates of Obligation Reallocation of funds to the correct account for the Hidden Springs&Stony Brook Culvert Replacement Project.Funding will cover material testing(S11,399.10), design(S31,250)and construction cost(S642,213.30).Construction contract was approved on April 29,2025. • SAM J76 -S— Date: 4/28/2025 County Judge Approval Date For Oracle Entry Only FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 43200 63432020 80101000 (684,862.40) 43200 63432600 80715000 684,862.40 BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No.24/25-29.06 5/6/2025 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE County Judge- General Fund Administration Supplies and Other Charges Expenditure 275.00 County Judge- General Fund Administration Contractual Services Expenditure 275.00 General Fund Reallocation of funds to the correct account to cover the annual contract for JustFOlA,which is used for open records r. test. • SAM Date: 4/28/2025 County Judge Approval Da For Oracle Entry Only FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 01000 10000100 60360000 (275.00) 01000 10000100 71020000 275.00 �..o,TE. ORT.,,. '.44, -e b b A50...7( BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Human Resources NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 5/6/2025 ITEM: ® Approval of Personnel Change of Status TO: Commissioners Court DATE: 05/01/2025 FISCAL IMPACT: False BUDGETED: False DOLLAR AMOUNT: $0.00 Human Resources is requesting the approval of the following Personnel Action Forms NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: (PAFs). A list of departments is included on the attached coversheet. All positions have been reviewed and verified that they fall within budget guidelines. Consequence of non- approval would be to the employee pay and/or position. ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Type Employment Separations - Public - 05- Cover Sheet Cover Memo 06-25..pdf Personnel Change of Status (May 1,2025) Commissioners' Court Date: 05-06-2025 Department Submitting Information: Human Resources Purpose of Submissions: - Consider and Take Action on Change Employment Department Name Employee Name Juvenile Services-Detention Lewis,Cleophus Road&Bridge-Administration Price,Chase Sheriff Office-Jail Administration Caston,Locglord Separations Department Name Employee Name District Attorney-Administration Norsworthy,Jessica Exposition Center-Administration Glodz,Damian Jail Medical Services Herrera,Naomi Sheriff Office-Jail Administration Ellis,Tytianna Sheriff Office-Jail Administration West,Jordan Tax Assessor-Collector-Administration Harris,Sylvia Personnel Action Forms Department Name Approved in Commissioners' Court:05-06-202 County Judge's or Commissioner's Signature: J y+ a< r t ' s� e §" ;z : 't .i1. wt.:. " ° a ' Atl'- -. , r s'' • _ 2022BZOC COUNTY"BOND PROGRAMDRAFT a ON SYSTEM PROJECTS" 2 Bryan Inner Loop East from SH 6 to W.O.Fitch Newiocation Super Street(4-lane $305,000,000 $101,000,000 $13,000,000 Schematic and Envronmental Clearance.This will divided) give us the number of impacted parcels and utilities. W/O the EA,the value of the ROW and Utilities is a m,Kr 2 Bryan SH 21 at SH 47 Interchange Improvements $65,000,000 $1,500,000 $3,000,000 Schematic and Environmental Clearance,ROW& Utillity Local Match 3 Bryan FM 1688 from SH 47 to FM 2818 Widen to 5-Lane Roadway $36,000,000 $16.000000 Construction(Project Total Is Soh,PS&E,ROW&lite - -,Match•$32 just for construction) 4 College Station/ FM 2818 FM 60 to SH 6 North Super Street(widen 4-lane 5150,000,000 $6,000,000 Schematic and Environmental Clearance,PS&E.ROW Bryan undisded to Wane divided& &Utility Local Match.Could be reduced to$6 million intersection improvements) for ENV to determine ROW and Utility costs. 5 College Station FM 2347 at FM 2154 Multimodai Single Point Urban $100,000,000 $63,000,000 $15.000,000 Local Match/Bush/Wellborn , Interchange - 6 College Station SH 40 from Arrington Rd to SH 6 Intersection Improvements $16,000,000 $16,000,000 Construction,ROW&Utility Local Match 7 College Station SH 30 from Associates Ave.to FM ISO Widen to 5-Lane Roadway $27,000,000 $11,000000 Construction(Project Total is Sub,PS&E,ROW&Site Mattis-$24 MM just for construction) O ECTS 8 Brazos County County/City FaciLtes Various Widen/New Location/Reconstruct 540,000,000 520,000,000 Possible partnership with Cities TOTAL $739,000,000 $165,500,000 $100,000,000 M001000072071 r` Pol ad paid for by YOU A Vote rgP� -ea Brazos County TRIP`22 g 5301 Woodall Court College Station,TX 77854 Election Admin.OfficeCollege Station Utilities 300 East Wm.l Bryan Pkw,Bryan • 7Service Center s 1603 Graham Road Arena Hall ' 2906 Tabor Road,Bryan College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue Galilee Baptist Church 804 N.Logan,Bryan Eculy Voting Oct.24- Nov.4 y} Election Day Tuesday, Nov. 8 "Yo-_r��...,r '' .•'=+ "ryr,rr .a- .,�:.e..x+w.--..-.. «a Y i- _ - .• 6 -- Y , . --`= , , 4 '' -•. . ice,• - - - 111VAFF I - •"4 " t r ` "° t,A-1> p` � , ; v =-• r.t�.`�4.q t l l �`*' --q ...'- , Me a "[ : , ?s,sy •s t ,tiny -I 4 'y ,as i ai -- .,-;,,.,' ry -,r4.-----..--=-.1.., ' . . . a,. -a` =� .. i 4Wr .'.-. fir. Gi*" Y }, .0 .�M a - _ 41 ,. `'°"-�ti,,.. .:r. ' r-.!;'�' 'WV •?,r _,. p a •,,,�. _ "4 A41 YAk „�,' 3 {.� _ .. ' }_ z A ,' " ^S a , L `" 4 ,, �"i —T,!41--ya.•.;et • i i`-n - .i a • t r -+�i +„.�'..�,..;v.-I -r ., � =u,r ., "' ' ;.: :n ,$ ,., _ 9 ;c'erg"' '. y{{`p N �6 ,}_t; 'a l'' . 'P §'` i`w.'�.2 ;'° d ' :,iMrjY� b ± Ylt e�*n Y,,. �y„t i li 4 _5� } , ,ra}` r t '� '� �y:. ^ R.; ,s„x,.� 4r ,, ya•,*. _ ",aG.,,I' 'Y \ZC,a $fit�ti_ —.L.., .�� i ! .._, . . 1 N ,iitlis I It. V. +�.. « � iwsa�� �y x `°", ?✓,.. .w-` • s+4 v'+' '�'# ," r`u. '•�a�, t F ;3'Dj - { k. #' y� _ ,w.w,,. • ` ]��� Il rli_r .i. ° 4. I I {."�'•• ' ate ,' t. .- - � TRAFFIC BEFORE : ` _ TRAFFIC TOQ .Y =:_-------- • I ITVL aNLY GET WOR E UDTE FRt,„ .... , , .., YACT . _ S .. S ROADS IC ;' � PROP AB. , " / _.. . ., . .. . . . , ., N • Better Roaf. R ... ise -_,,t . .:„- ,::..-v.-,- .'a r'-'ff..-:eg --,1'11 : -^" ''' -''""4'-rp ,'te-,`0t-t. "...'=.1,;".'-';',.`"->8 c ,' 6'c, q" '. l•. 4 a: "+"W +` 4 b` a' a i '`. `; ;Y2• L • .s vµ, _ �"•` „�Y f x 1 7pv N n the last 10 years, Brazos County has grown 19%.With this growth, • ,r'.L " , 7 / l` ' '- ,y ems-- our roads have grown more congested, leading to longer commutes • ' J -_ I .1 0.1 ;'� and delaying our first responders headed to emergencies. \`�` " • f �" v'{ .4s. �'` ./' �C , ter } '� , ' - �:-_, �' Prop A will fund vital improvements to widen, resurface,and upgrade _ N. , 3 ( `` �,,� '" -� j roads and bridges throughout our community.This will increase safety, �� ` '� • _ -� ,'` ( reduce traffic,and divert cross-county travelers away from our schools i r and neighborhoods. -:., 6. 1 —4, * ri Y ram. Brazos County consistently runs a fiscally conservative budget kv-N.. V ,Y- ` / C` ,/• 57 that has earned a 'AA' Bond rating from Standard and Poor's.This �" ? `;, `� means the county has a great credit score and pays less in interest `>', 1 \ 4 ' o its debt. More importantly,the count can service the bond ✓� '�. rates n i Y ` �{•') , \> •.°` through its current operating budget while lowering the tax rate. F \, Prop A will allow the local investment in infrastructure projects to be �, ,4 . leveraged for significant state funds to improve local roads.The Texas 1 � ' ,\ Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has more demand for projects „' � ;e , „• ?t,. `, than it has the resources to fund. Projects with local funds invested - ��', n�R r r\i.,,,,_..., - i` � 1t`�• °u;.Y: ,- t� / move up the priority list. C., ?:� i s- J /L`, w >, ;m Prop B will enhance transportation funding through the Brazos C) �� Re ional BCRMA with a small vehicle � t � County g Mobility Authority(BCRMA) registration fee.This will ensure local residents have a direct seat at the �:.:-__s, %�‘' ,/ \re c ",- table for state and federal transportation fundingdecisions. T max✓ ), l'' / The BCRMA Board is made up of local residents that have years of experience working on Brazos County transportation issues that impact our quality of life.The BCRMA works in close collaboration with cammmillut TxDOT,City of Bryan,City of College Station, and Brazos County. # LEARN MORE AT �= $. Vote for Prop A 8� B on November 8th to keep our excellent ';ex. ~ ' RAZOSCUN 6P22•CO quality of life in Brazos County. v,-'- .,e•• 4. m j- t.- ., .1t1 :a .�. tt: rm..s,..... v - -`" '€. cC .' s,s°• „ter v .w {_j.•Y . -•sue .R ,, .-fir ,`1 ,. C., ' a�: rp .Z-! :;,�.Ny"`'F1:"., v0 ` ;?;,�._T4� ,:•F`;.°,�6:'G.r• � ,�.�: C g ��f 'o zn+ �', V �'Ff�`?x .4-5!"' 3 � %'e� � ?i5a '° air ,6'.�5, .e"r '*. ",•�, ^�:..v-,,�f�r.w. - y,- �, / .,�'. .,r.�' t �S'S�. 4., .. •] '�''.Pi • :14 • J`n�cq.t..P,,,. �. Yti� ,t`s' ,,, � `f', '.:..° � y,s-',r.�. •. `.r•�.5�. .: ..•;-•''^,, �;5. ;x�cv f`� '�`�,: "1�a •`ia . 'c+r�" a r `"' t`4: .. , . I "� ti• R4 TEN '"._{°+. • 3y . F z . , • la ` S ' h+t �/ fr• jL . 41e1--._:„ i".‘,',.., , IV In }5 d i4 . .-",` 44 .'.s°.;, 44,44,, ,� Prot•e �� � :l P ect ? � � C[YlECd 5f4K'�.SNYN° _ ,mot' &iw£NL6iY^Wt Y tith. ''NT dO TO Ygp..1N • { rwW&.GTO'N i�iW ,dU+EAEET Wt1CNtlndwra. (, ` } 4' NPYIOGTNH Sl�iN BTA[Rlk: �. t \ .N`' s l KI,(`•7 , Yr ' •T� , ,fi ,. gibs ,-/ / OAP t T ti , , • kf:. COLLEGE E(A \. " � fi "°;' ' °!� }:"' � % .:Jti; .—„, .~z * T •r g, Nr- 71 11111teN '., 41 ''° * liV,,. c, ''_., '. k ''',' ,'I) ''%,,,.,,,,, ' ; 1:f i '' \ r r i'�� t o a4 cu duY4E osNr t IA%urctt wrae,, as9 P Yx h.p 1? r.-E,,rTHN{, - r y r .4 t/ i O., ,./..\ X' 7 '"44, ‹.,,,V/0,,,,--‘-, \„. \ 1.... 's:1 M13tk1N14w .:iE 29 '''' '.,7Nt..'< ,:;'';5r41---fS4''',.';- - 1 \" il �F \ il 1" T v/ ^u \ �� � c , `e l / ..f t e� ` \ ice r 10, Brazos County idol E1 .7c.,:ailoii;e4i4s_11-01.$:,4,,,,ATe-*74-0,,,zirlii,414 R irz i � a i , 2022 November 8th General and Special Elections * £ , . ' 13m ath`Ginera?2 �5?e ah" 4 �'' '-x:'Pecincts Re r r Po, m le a 1 = x 19of119 i0� , n 4 11/8/2022 , E,7 i w 4 Page 6It„.:-:t1IP _ IJ _._.._. _ Brazos County-Proposition A ` " Choice Party Absentee Voting Early Voting Election Day Voting 3 Total1. For 1,483 67.29% 22,121 67.93% 13,832 65.87% 1; ` 37,436 67`13% Against 721 32.71% 10,444 32.07% 7,167 34.13% 1.' .18,332 ' 3287%, Cast Votes: 2,204 100.00% 32,565 100.00% 20,999 100.00% =55,768 100.00% Undervotes: 141 1,356 1,101 } 2,598 Overvotes: 1 0 0 lam: :` z 11Brazos`County-,Proposition B ; . Choice Party Absentee Voting Early Voting Election Day Voting , ` ` Totalj For 1,035 47,00% 13,865 42.63% 8,118 38.63% 2"3 018 :4730%i Against 1,167 53.00% 18,656 57.37% 12,896 61.37% `"' 32,719 '5870%i i Cast Votes: 2,202 100.00% 32,521 100.00% 21,014 100.00% i 55,737 100.00%' Undervotes: 142 1,400 1,086 2,628 Overvotes: 2 0 0 2 r _ _ , 'Mayor° Choice Party Absentee Voting Early Voting Election Day Voting a e,. Total( Bobby Gutierrez NP 377 41.70% 5,104 51.59% 3,841 53.92% ,_^" , 9,322' = 52 0 Brent Hairston NP 273 30.20% 3,107 31.41% 2,179 30.59% ` -, 5,559 :31.0?„%rt Mike Southerland NP 254 28.10% 1,682 17.00% 1,103 15.49% 3,039 ,16.96% Cast Votes: 904 100.00% 9,893 100.00% 7,123 100.00% ! '' 17,920 100.00%r Undervotes: 51 737 606 : 1394 ' ,I Overvotes: 0 0 0 Counciimember:Single Member District One; _ ,. , ,_ Choice Party Absentee Voting Early Voting Election Day Voting #` Total] Raul Santana NP 25 39.68% 395 51.30% 345 48.52% i. ` 765 .4.9.55% Paul Torres NP 38 60.32% 375 48.70% 366 51.48% 779 . .5045%, Cast Votes: 63 100.00% 770 100.00% 711 100.00% '.1 > 1,544 .100.00%j Undervotes: 7 125 141 273 Overvotes: 0 0 0 ,_.s. .�.`