Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024/07/30 REGULAR SESSION 10:00AM2Ui2q JUL 7b A II: BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION ON JULY 30, 2024 AT 10:00 AM IN THE COMMISSIONERS COURTROOM OF THE BRAZOS COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 200 S. TEXAS AVENUE, SUITE 106, BRYAN, TX 77803, THE PUBLIC MAY WATCH THE MEETING LIVE AT FACEBOOK.COM/BRAZOSCOUNTYTX 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance • U.S. and Texas Flag - Commissioner Aldrich 2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns 3. Presentations and/or Discussions • Presentation by Trudy Hancock, Elections Administrator, on legal requirements for list maintenance of the voter registration role. Consider and take action on agenda items: 4 -15 4. Approval of Declaration of Intent to commit funding from the Local Provider Participation Fund for the Demonstration Year (DY) 13 Uncompensated Care (UC) to support upcoming I GT Request. 5. Award of RFP #CI P 24-620 Staffing Analysis for Brazos County Detention Center. Recommended Award: CGL Management Group, LLC. 6. Consider and take action on the Wellbom SUD utility permit to construct a road bore at 12318 North Dowling Road to provide water service. Site is located in Precinct 1. 7. Consider and take action on the Wellborn SUD utility permit to construct a road bore at 1299 Pleasant Hill Road to provide water services. Site is located in Precinct 4. 8. Request approval of the Final Plat of Southern Pointe Subdivision Section 400, Block 79, Lots 37 through 43, 0.921 Acre Being a Replat of Block 79, Common Area I, 400 Southern Pointe Subdivision Section 400; Sterrett D. Smith League Survey, A-210; City of College Station ETJ, Brazos County, Texas. Site is located in Precinct 1. 9. Request approval of the Final Plat of Winding Creek Estates Phase 5, 4.479 Acres, Block 6, Lot 71 R and Common Area 3 being a Replat of Winding Creek Estates Phase 5 Block 6, Lot 71; J.C. Stuteville Survey, A-216; City of College Station ETJ, Brazos County, Texas. Site is located in Precinct 1. 10. Tax Refund Applications for the following: Overpayments • a. Cheryl E. Bucek - $95.04 • b. Diana Castro - $12.57 • c. Juan & Delia L Mandujano - $547.55 Payment in Error • d. Lereta LLD DBAAccumatch - $339.77 11. Budget Amendments. • FY 23/24 Budget Amendments 41.01 - 41.04 12. Personnel Change of Status. • Approval of Personnel Change of Status 13. Payment of Claims. 14. Convene into Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code §551.0725 to deliberate business and financial issues related to a contract being negotiated. 15. Consider and possible action on Executive Session. 16. Acknowledgement of FY 2023-2024 Budget to Actuals by Fund as of July 24, 2024. Acknowledgement of FY 2023-2024 Contingency Budget to Actuals by Fund as of July 24, 2024. 17. Acknowledgement of monthly reports submitted in July 2024. 18. Juvenile director's report on detention population. 19. Sheriff's report on inmate population. 20. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics. 21. Adjourn. PUBLIC COMMENTS Public Comment during the Commission Meeting may be for all matters, both on and off the agenda, and be limited to four minutes per person. Persons are invited to submit comments in writing on the agenda items and/or attend and make comment at the Commission meeting. Members of the public are reminded that the Brazos County Commissioners Court is a Constitutional Court, with both judicial and legislative powers, created under Article V, Section 1 and Section 18 of the Texas Constitution. As a Constitutional Court, the Brazos County Commissioners Court also possesses the power to issue a Contempt of Court Citation under Section 81.024 of the Texas Local Government Code. Accordingly, members of the public in attendance at any Regular, Special and/or Emergency meeting of the Court shall conduct themselves with proper respect and decorum in speaking to, and/or addressing the Court; in participating in public discussions before the Court; and in all actions in the presence of the Court. Those members of the public who are inappropriately attired and/or who do not conduct themselves in an orderly and appropriate manner will be ordered to leave the meeting. Refusal to abide by the Court's Order and/or continued disruption of the meeting may result in a Contempt of Court Citation. It is not the intention of the Brazos County Commissioners Court to provide a public forum for the demeaning of any individual or group. Neither is it the intention of the Court to allow a member (or members) of the public to insult the honesty and/or integrity of the Court, as a body, or any member or members of the Court, or County employees, individually or collectively. Accordingly, profane, insulting or threatening language directed toward the Court and/or any person in the Court's presence and/or racial, ethnic or gender slurs or epithets will not be tolerated. Violation of these rules may result in the following sanctions: 1. cancellation of a speaker's time; 2. removal from the Commissioners Court; 3. a Contempt Citation; and/or 4. such other and/or criminal sanctions as may be authorized under the Constitution, Statutes and Codes of the State of Texas. The County Commissioners Court can deliberate or take action only if a matter has been listed on an agenda properly posted prior to the meeting. During the public comment period, speakers may address matters not listed on the published agenda. The Open Meeting Law does not expressly prohibit responses to public comments by the Commissioners Court. However, responses from the County Judge or Commissioners to unlisted public comment topics could become deliberation on a matter without notice to the public. To ensure the public has notice of all matters the Commissioners Court will consider, the County Judge and/or Commissioners may choose not to respond to public comments, except to correct factual inaccuracies, recite existing policy in response to an inquiry or to ask that a matter be listed on a future agenda. See Texas Open Meetings Act Section 551.042. INVOCATION Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Court meeting shall be to and for the benefit of the Court. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Court and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Court in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Court. The Commissioners Courtroom of the Brazos County Administration Building, 200 S. Texas Avenue, Suite 106, Bryan, TX77803, THE PUBLIC MAY WATCH THE MEETING LIVE AT FACEBOOK.COM/BRAZOSCOUNTYTXis wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made two working days before the meeting. To make arrangements, please call (979) 361-4102. Duane Peters County Judge Steve Aldrich Commissioner, Precinct 1 The foregoing minutes of the Commissioners Court Meeting held July 30, 2024, have been examined and are approved in open Court this 6th day of August 2024, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas . Chuck Konderla Nancy Berry Commissioner, Precinct 2 Commissioner, Precinct 3 Wanda J. Wats Commissioner, Attest: cinct 4 any--rl 0 - Karen McQueen County Clerk 163 akie-P Depl, MINUTES JULY 30, 2024 BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT REGULAR MEETING A regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court of Brazos County, Texas was held in the Brazos County Commissioners Courtroom in the Administration Building, 200 South Texas Avenue, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas, beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, July 30, 2024 with the following members of the Court present: Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding; Steve Aldrich, Commissioner of Precinct 1, Absent; Chuck. Konderla, Commissioner of Precinct 2; Nancy Berry, Commissioner of Precinct 3; Wanda J. Watson, Commissioner of Precinct 4; Karen McQueen, County Clerk, Absent. The attached sheets contain the names of the citizens and officials that were in attendance. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance • U.S. and Texas Flag - Commissioner Aldrich Judge Peters led the prayer and pledge in Commissioner Aldrich's absence. 2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns Cathie Viens read the Congressional Record from January 10,1963 regarding "Communist Goals". Cynde Wiley continued reading from the same Congressional Record. Keith T. King read a letter from a Fredericksburg citizen expressing his concerns over the security of Electronic Voting Machines and reverting to paper ballots. Kristy Roe reminded the Court and the public the Tax Office will be closed Thursday August 1, 2024 for internal, operations and will resume normal hours on Friday August 2, 2024. Ms. Roe informed the Court the final audit by the Department of Motor Vehicles was completed on Thursday July 25, 2024 and the report will be submitted soon. Ms. Roe commended Facility Services for the phenomenal job they do maintaining the Tax Office building. Commissioner Berry thanked Ms. Roe for her service as the Brazos County Tax Assessor/Collector. 3. Presentations and/or Discussions • Presentation by Trudy Hancock, Elections Administrator, on legal requirements for list maintenance of the voter registration role. Elections Administrator Trudy Hancock gave a presentation on the Voter Registration List in response to remarks that were made during Commissioners Court on July 23, 2024. Ms. Hancock explained that although the statistics given are correct, there are some points that should be clarified. Ms. Hancock addressed the 54 voters over 100 years old, stating that 17 are on suspense and 22 have the birth date of January 1, 1901. Ms. Hancock stated that when the Help America Vote Act passed, voters with no date of birth were assigned the birth date of January 1, 1901, as a placeholder. She said if the registration has not been updated, the voter would still have that birth date assigned. Ms. Hancock said she has received 608 challenges to voter registration on grounds of residency, and 433 of those challenges were rejected due to an affidavit lacking the required information. Ms. Hancock went on to explain that erroneous cancellations result in disenfranchised voters. Commissioner Watson commended Ms. Hancock for all the hard work she and the Elections Administration staff perform daily. Commissioner Berry and Judge Peters concurred with Commissioner Watson. Ms. Hancock encouraged anyone who has questions to please contact her office. A copy of the presentation is attached. Consider and take action on agenda items: 4 -15 4. Approval of Declaration of Intent to commit funding from the Local Provider Participation Fund for the Demonstration Year (DY) 13 Uncompensated Care (UC) to support upcoming I GT Request. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 5. Award of RFP #CI P 24-620 Staffing Analysis for Brazos County Detention Center. Recommended Award: CGL Management Group, LLC. The Court voted unanimously to accept the recommendation of the Purchasing Agent and awarded RFP #CIP 24-620 Staffing Analysis for Brazos County Detention Center to CGL Management Group, LLC. A copy of the contract and bid tabulation is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 6. Consider and take action on the Wellborn SUD utility permit to construct a road bore at 12318 North Dowling Road to provide water service. Site is located in Precinct 1. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 7. Consider and take action on the Wellborn SUD utility permit to construct a road bore at 1299 Pleasant Hill Road to provide water services. Site is located in Precinct 4. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 8. Request approval of the Final Plat of Southern Pointe Subdivision Section 400, Block 79, Lots 37 through 43, 0.921 Acre Being a Replat of Block 79, Common Area I, 400 Southern Pointe Subdivision Section 400; Sterrett D. Smith League Survey, A-210; City of College Station ETJ, Brazos County, Texas. Site is located in Precinct 1. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 9. Request approval of the Final Plat of Winding Creek Estates Phase 5, 4.479 Acres, Block 6, Lot 71 R and Common Area 3 being a Replat of Winding Creek Estates Phase 5 Block 6, Lot 71; J.C. Stuteville Survey, A-216; City of College Station ETJ, Brazos County, Texas. Site is located in Precinct 1. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 10. Tax Refund Applications for the following: Overpayments • a. Cheryl E. Bucek - $95.04 • b. Diana Castro - $12.57 • c. Juan & Delia L Mandujano - $547.55 Payment in Error • d. Lereta LLD DBA Accumatch - $339.77 Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 11. Budget Amendments. • FY 23/24 Budget Amendments 41.01 -41.04 41.01 Transfer Contingency Funds to the 272nd District Court. 41.02 Transfer Contingency Funds to Facility Services. 41.03 Transfer Contingency Funds to Purchasing Administration. 41.04 3 Reallocate funds for Sheriff's Office - Administration. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 12. Personnel Change of Status. • Approval of Personnel Change of Status A copy of the Personnel Change of Status is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 13. Payment of Claims. Claims 8204060 - 8204234 9201771 - 9201827 Motion: , Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson.. 4-0. Ayes: Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. Absent: Aldrich. 14. Convene into Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code §551.0725 to deliberate business and financial issues related to a contract being negotiated. Cathie Viens requested information on what the contract entailed. Judge Peters stated this was a negotiation and once an agreement was reached then the contract would be publicized. At this point, the County Judge announced the Court would consider items 16 through 20 and then return to convene into Executive Session. Having considered the previously noted agenda items, General Counsel Bruce Erratt submitted a written determination that deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the Court in negotiations with a third party. A motion was offered by Commissioner Konderla to meet in closed Executive Session as per Mr. Erratt's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Berry and the motion passed unanimously. At 10:48 a.m. the County Judge announced the meeting closed to the public, so the Court could convene into Executive Session as stated above. The following individuals were asked to stay for the session: Cheryl Coffman, Executive Assistant Bruce Erratt, General Counsel Ed Bull, Chief of Staff 15. Consider and possible action on Executive Session. At 11:02 a.m. the County Judge announced the meeting open to the public and announced that no action would be taken on the Closed Executive Session. 16. Acknowledgement of FY 2023-2024 Budget to Actuals by Fund as of July 24, 2024. Acknowledgement of FY 2023-2024 Contingency Budget to Actuals by Fund as of July 24, 2024. The Court acknowledged receipt of the FY 2023-2024 Budget to Actuals by Fund and FY 2023-2024 Contingency Budget to Actuals by Fund as of July 24, 2024. 17. Acknowledgement of monthly reports submitted in July 2024. The Court acknowledged receipt of the Extension Service reports submitted in July 2024 and acknowledged receipt of reports from the County Clerk and Constable, Precinct 3 offices showing revenues collected and remitted to the County Treasurer. 18. Juvenile director's report on detention population. Juvenile Director Linda Ricketson reported there are 26 juveniles in the detention center, 16 are male, 10 are female, and 29 have electronic monitors. 19. Sheriff's report on inmate population. Sheriff Wayne Dicky stated there were 824 inmates in jail, 692 inmates are male, 132 are female and 40 have electronic monitors. 20. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics. Commissioner Konderla wished Sheriff Wayne Dicky a happy birthday and asked everyone to keep our country in prayer. General Counsel Bruce Erratt reminded everyone of the blood drive on Friday August 2, 2024, in the lobby of the Brazos County Administration Building. 21. Adjourn. BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT ("VV1 DAY OF ��� , 20,4 O;CD A '/PM, Name (PLEASE PRINT) 4.hc Ket/v-e."- efyi Asin --eY-5 - Jov Q n :e1drf a L ,tea (J- Jf (°v rlde Vuers Lcq 0 ►A R '5 Lk t -k )-, 7biZ utp6A 6/,1 j Nly\o,? Organization (PLEASE PRINT) Om1Y1 • Lti-- Nyo • alc Co. C) -k's c g/z2.66Y, Pg of; 3 BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT _fir- DAY OF � �,, , 20j ci 1 o o (A?PM, Name (PLEASE PRINT) N*1 S - Li n otk s+�f-z VatA\ Nw CkOtJVVLC tAJ4OJ— ark-ufyair c v- M.4,Li 5 ZikAtcgowAJ ,Pd Organization (PLEASE PRINT) _ Pr I flivaktsii C,O Tuaf Pg 3 of -3 BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT 30 DA Y OF , 20d L / Co, /PM, ,? - (ti / / J(t4/ Name (PLEASE PRINT) jl/ri 114 ,s,„)/4274, QgyAA# (hr C 4 Ikarre�\ 62A ite J 1 \cAx-13�-- \ Ev 2 pl e I/te PA Organization (PLEASE PRINT) c/VZ— gir/1 S � l 1CO&x (//04 fAi e."-\ o c O\ LI IIIl.1I GI I J L.1'GGI CA LUIS V-- 6JIA.JaI J I Caf.Da Iut..J Marxists in#emet chi - _' •1 Communist Goals Congressional Record —Appendix, pp. A34 -A35 January -10, 1963 Source: http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comg�oals.htm Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963 Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of Pe Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated td the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America. At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which; she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen: [From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen] CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS 1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war. 2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war. 3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength. 4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war. 5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites. 6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination. 7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N. S. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N. 9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress. io. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N. II%Anni\n/ rmnrvictc rrri/clIhicar,t/art!lltor2tiirAID'_hH drP_nIr fI aoVIaoV1.htm0 1 vI 11 I4f. vI i v r.I la 1 a.J aaa 1 v Nl 4/ IIa✓.�. I 1 IV I IIVV ,ILi Nogr—Tr 1 —vv 1 IV I 11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one -world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.) 12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party. 13. Do away with all loyalty oaths. 14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office. 15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States. 16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken, basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights. 17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks. 18. Gain control of all student newspapers. 19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack. 20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book -review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions. 21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures. 22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms." 23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art." 24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press. 25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. 26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy." 27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need, for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch." 28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state." 29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old- httrns://www_marxkkts_nra/ctehipr-f/art/litpratirp/rhiirlrpro/rof html VI III %AI VI I .. lilt, I VII. VII 0.JIISJU IUI I V1fJI Ire la ■T. fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis. 30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Presen them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man." 31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over. 32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized ccontrol over any part of the culture --education, social agencies, welfare rograms, mental health clinics, etc. 33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus. 34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities. 35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI. 36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions. 37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business. 38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat]. 39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals. 4O. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage' promiscuity and easy divorce. 41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents. 42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special. -interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems. 43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government. 44. Internationalize the Panama Canal. 45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] overnations and individuals alike. Chlidren's Literature Resources httnQ./hArIniw marxictc nrri/ci ihiort/Art/litcrati irca/ hiinlrariireaf/rvnvirinv1 html 1 1 1 � be valid a eh ;� 1 t1owii, requl BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Budget Office. DATE OF COURT MEETING: 7/30/2024 ITEM: TO: FROM: DATE: FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGETED: DOLLAR AMOUNT: SOURCE OF FUNDS: REQUIREMENTS: NOTES/EXCEPTI ONS: NUMBER: Approval of Declaration of intent to commit funding from the Local Provider Participation Fund for the Demonstration Year (DY) 13 Uncompensated Care (UC) to support upcoming IGT Request. Commissioners Court Nina Payne 07/25/2024 False False $0.00 Fund 16000 - Local Provider Participation Fund (LPPF) $36,945,126.33. estimated amount - IGT projections are for the commitment purposes only and are not final IGT amounts. Declaration of Intent must be submitted to HHSC on or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 2, 2024. The amount that is declared is non -binding, however, the declaration amount give HHSC a valuable estimate of expected IGT amounts across the pogrom. ACTION REQUESTED OR Request approval. ALTERNATIVES: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Memo for_UC_DY_13 Final IGT July 2024.pdf Declaration of Intent UC DY 13 Final Commitment Notification_ _UC_DY_13.pdf Declaration of Intent UC DY 13 Final Backup Lype Cover Memo Backup Material APPROVED Du.. - Peters County Judge iao(w-t- Date BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS Duane Peters Office of the County Judge 200 S. Texas Ave., Ste. 332 Bryan, TX 77803 July -30, 2024 Phone: (979) 361-4102 Fax: (979) 361-4503 Email: dpeters@brazoscountytx.gov To Whom it May Concern: Per your request, please find the attached IGT Commitment Form for the Brazos County LPPF for UC DY13 Final. The Jefferson SDA has committed to fund 100% of the expected IGT need as calculated in the "Hosp IGT Commitment by Provider" tab, confirming the SDA's ability to support the maximum amount of IGT needed. If another SDA fails to support 100% of their need;' the MRSA Central SDA would like the opportunity to commit additional IGT dollars to receive the additional funds. If based on the received commitment forms HHSC does not believe the MRSA Central SDA to be 100% committed, we ask that you reach out and give the opportunity for us to increase our commitment, prior to reducing any payments to the SDA. Duane Peters County Judge Sponsoring. Governmental Entity Information - Sponsoring Governmental Entity (SGE) Name* (e.g. [Name] County, [Name] Hospital District, City of [Name], etc.) Brazos County dba Brazos County LPPF SGE's Operational Nature** '' (If SGE administers and operates an LPPF and is.IGT1ng from the. LPPF, select LPPF-SGE's Operational Nature) ,, LPPF-County SGE TEXNET Location Number (five digit number associated with the SGE's TEXNET account used to transfer IGT to HHSC) 08844 SGE Jurisdiction County.Name (if the SGE is not a state entity, which county is it located in?) Brazos Does the Transferring SGE have General Taxing Authority ? Yes j j Payment Information Is the Transferring. SGE Eligible for Payment Under UC? No If yes, please provide the following: TPI of SGE Eligible for Payment NPI of SGE Eligible for Payment Certification and Attestation Certifier's Name -. .. Duane Peters Certifier's Title Brazos County Judge; Certifier's Email npayne@brazoscountytx.gov Certifier's Phone . 979-361-4186 j I attest that I am -a person legally authorized to sign for the transferring entity and that the information entered is correct to my best knowledge and belief. I also understand that the declaration of intent does not bind the governmental entity: to transfer IGT.- IYes I Page 1of2 MRSA Central SDA Transfer Amount (Transfer Occurs on September 06., 20.24) $ . . 14,896,164.49 MRSA Northeast - $ 240,504.53 Travis - $ I 2,029,213.43. Jefferson _ .. $ i (220,756.12) Harris $ 20,000,000.00 • Estimated total $ 36,945,126.33 Page 2 of 2 CONSULTANT SERVICE AGREEMENT— Brazos County Detention Center Staffing Analysis This Consultant Service agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between Brazos County, Texas (Brazos County) located at 200 S. Texas Ave. Suite 352, Bryan, Texas 77803, and CGL Management Group, LLC ("CGL") located at 5200 Waterford District Dr. Suite 430, Miami, FL 33126, for consultant services related to the Brazos County Detention Center Staffing Analysis — Proposal No. CIP 24-620 ("Project") and shall become effective upon the full execution by all parties as of the date of the last party to sign below (the "Effective Date"). CGL and Brazos County agree as follows: 1.0 AGREEMENT 1.1 Documents: This Agreement constitutes the entire contract between CGL and Brazos County for services related to the Project and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous communications, representations and contracts, oral, and wr'tten, with respect to its subject matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CGL acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the consultant agreement by and between CGL and Brazos County ("Client"). This Agreement incorporates the following documents(s): Exhibit: Exhibit Title: Exhibit -A CGL Proposal Exhibit -A is incorporated for the limited purposes of establishing CGL's Services and Compensation. 1.2 Conflicts: If a conflict, ambiguity, or other discrepancy exists n the interpretation of this Agreement, CGL must comply with the more stringent obligation, duty, and responsibility. 1.3 Modifications: No subsequent agreement between CGL and Brazos County binds on either party unless it is in writing and signed by the authorizedrepresentative of both CGL and Brazos County. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 Basic Compensation. For Proper performance of Basic Services, subject to Article 5.0 CGL will pay CGL the Lump sum fee of $77,930. This amount covers all professional services and expenses associated with the project. 2.2 Additional Compensation. 'For proper performance of CGL's authorized Additional Services, subject to Article 5.0, Brazos County will pay for CGL on any hourly basis in accordance with the hourly billing rates stated in Exhibit -B. 3.0 SERVICES "Services" refers to all Basic and Additional Services as follows: 3.1 Basic Services. CGL will perform all services required of it in Exhibit -A and all other services customarily provided by other Consultants performing the same or similar services on projects of the same or similar size and complexity ("Basic Services"). 3.2 Additional Services. CGL will perform other services within it9 expertise, but not part of Basic Services, if and only to the extent such services are mutually agreed to and approved by Brazos County ("Additional Services"). Brazos County has no obligation to compensate CGL for any Additional Services performed witholut written authorization. CGL has a duty to notify Brazos County following the occurrence of any event, condition or circumstance thatmay require CGL to perform Additional Services. Brazos County will determine and advise CGL of authorization for delivery of any Additional Services in writing. 3.3 Standard of Care. CGL has a duty to perform all Services reasonably expected of a properly qualified and competent Consultant performing in the same or similar services on projects of similar size and complexity. 4.0 SCHEDULE 4.1 4.2 Conditional Payments. Brazos County's obligation to pay Compensation is contingent upon acceptance and receipt of services from CGL. Timely performance is a material obligation and stated time lil itations are of the essence in this Agreement. CGL has a duty to perform all Services to the best of its ability in accordance with the time requirements indicated by the County. In all instances, CGL will perform the Services expeditiously, so as not to cause a delay to Brazos County. 5.0 PAYMENT 5.1 Withholding. Brazos County may withhold from payment any amount Brazos County determines in good faith to be reasonably necessary to protect Brazos County from loss resulting from CGL's failure to comply with a material obligation of this Agreement. 5.2 Invoicing. CGL will submit a monthly invoice by the fifth (5th) day of each calendar month. Each invoice will itemize in detail the full amount of Compensation and Reimbursable Expenses incurred through the last day of the preceding month. Proper documentation must accompany each invoice in a form reasonably acceptable to Brazos County. At a minimum, proper documentation includes, but is not limited to, the following information current through the date of CGL's invoice: (1) CGL's project number, (2) project name and description, (3) name of CGL's authorized representative or project manager, (4) invoice number and date of invoice, (5) detailed description of professional services rendered and date of performance, (6) contract type (stipulated sum, or hourly), (7) contract amount (by phase), (8) percentage complete (by phase), (9) invoice amount (by phase — current and previous), and (10) amount invoiced to date. CGL will represent that the -information contained in the invoice is true and correct. Brazos County reserves the right to contest any such invoice submitted for payment. 5.3 Hourly Rates. The hourly rates stated in Exhibit -A are applicable to the position for which the rates are specified. The substitution or replacement of an individual in any position does not result in an increase to the corresponding hourly rate. CGL's hourly rates are fixed from the date of this Agreement. Thereafter, CGL may request in writing an • adjustment to the hourly rates, which will occur only following Brazos County's written approval. 5.4 Payments to Third Parties. COL will promptly pay all subcont%actors, vendors, suppliers and other third parties furnishing to CGL any services, labor, or materials related to the Project. CGL has a material obligation to pay such third parties within the shorter of the maximum time period permitted by Applicable Law or (30) calendar days after receipt of payment from Brazos County. 6.0 INSURANCE 6.1 Insurance Policies & Minimum Coverage Limits. During the Coverage Term described in Section 6.2, CGL has a duty to procure and maintain the Insurance Policies stated below with the minimum limits of liability equal to or greater than the minimum Coverage Limits required below. All premiums for insurance coverage requiredby the Agreement are the sole responsibility of CGL and included in CGL's Compensation. The required Insurance Policies and Minimum Coverage Limits are: Insurance Policies: Workers' Compensation Employer's Liability General Liability Minimum Coverage Limits: Statutory USD 1,000.000 (Per Occurrence/Aggregate) USD 2,000,000 (Pe Occurrence/Aggregate) Automobile Liability Excess (Umbrella) Liability Professional Liability USD 1,000,000 (Per Occurrence/Aggregate) USD 1,000.000 (Per Occurrence/Aggregate) USD 1,000,000 (Per Occurrence/Aggregate) 6.2 Coverage Term. Each policy of Professional Liability insurance will be retroactive to the earlier of the date of this Agreement or the actual date of commencement of the Services. All Insurance Policies continue during performance of this Agreement and for a period extending until the later of: (1) three years following the date of Completion of the Project, and (2) the date applicable statute(s) of limitation expire ("Coverage Term"). 6.3 Evidence of Insurance. Prior to commencing the Services, CGL has a duty to provide Brazos County with a certificate of insurance evidencing compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. Each certificate will stipulate that if the required insurance policies are to be canceled prior to completion or termination of this Agreement, the issuing company will provide Brazos County at least thirty (30) days' prior written notice of such event. Brazos County's receipt of CGL's certificate(s) of insurance is a condition preceding CGL's right to any receive payment of any amount under this Agreement. The failure to provide certificate(s) of insurance With thirty (30) days following the date of this Agreement is a material nonperformance. 6.4 Representation & Warranty of Insurance Coverage. CGL represents that it now carries and will continue to maintain during the Coverage Term the Insurance Policies and Minimum Coverage Limits stated in this Article. During the Coverage Term, CGL warrants that it will maintain the Minimum Coverage Limits stated in this Article and that its insurance policies are and will remain in compliance with the following: (1) CGL is named on CGL's General Liability and Automobile Liability policies; (2) each of CGL's insurance policies is primary to, non-contributing and not in excess of any other insurance available to CGL. 7.0 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 CGL has a duty to indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from every claim, demand, damage, lien, cause of action, award, judgment, cost expense, fee (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses) and other loss to the extent caused by: (1) any negligent or wrongful act, error, or omission by CGL or any party for whose conduct CGL is legally responsible, (2) breach of this Agreement by CGL, (3) any copyright or patent infringement by CGL or any party for whose conduct CGL is legally responsible, (4) any failure to comply with laws' (including Applicable Law), regulations, codes, ordinances, and other requirements of governing authorities by CGL or any party for whose conduct CGL is legally responsible, (5) any failure to pay any service, withholding, or other tax by COL or any other party for whose conduct CGL is legally responsible, and/or (6) any failure to pay third parties after receipt of payment from the CGL as required by Section 5.5. In the event the County is a defendant or respondent in a cause of action, dispute (including Disputes) or other claim based, in whole or in part, n the alleged act error or omission of CGL or any party for whose conduct CGL is legally responsible. CGL has a duty to reasonably cooperate with the County in responding to such cause of action, dispute, or other claim. Reasonable cooperation includes at a minimum, furnishing appropriate expert or other testimony, timely responding to requests for discovery of documents and other information, and/or otherwise furnishing reasonable assistance to the County and its counsel until such claim is finally resolved. 8.0 DELIVERABLES 8.1 Deliverables. Copyrights, and Use. Upon execution of this Agreement, CGL grants, conveys, and otherwise transfers to Brazos County all ownership and copyrights in all drawings, specifications, and other documents (electronic, paper, digital, photographic, and other media) prepared by CGL under this Agreement ("Deliverables"). CGL has an unconditional duty to provide all Deliverables to Brazos County on or before the date such documents are required to be delivered under this Agreement or within seven (7) days following receipt of a written demand for delivery by Brazos County, which is later. CGL's failure to provide the Deliverables in accordance with this Article is a material breach of this Agreement. In no event is payment of compensation or any other amount a condition precedent to the obligation to provide the Deliverables as requred by this Article. CGL may retain copies, including reproducible copies, ofthe Deliverables for information, reference, or other reasons required by law. CGL will not make changes to any drawings, specifications, or other documents (including, without limitation, electronic files) furnished to Brazos County without prior written consent.`Alldrawings, specifications, and other documents (electronic, paper, digital, photographic, and other media) provided to COL remain the property of Brazos County. Brazos County will indemnify and hold CGL harmless if Brazos County uses the Deliverables for any purpose unrelated to the Project without CGL's written consent or professional involvement. 9.0 TERMINATION 9.1 Brazos County may terminate or suspend performance under this Agreement on the seventh (7th) calendar day following CGL's receipt of Brazos County's written notice of termination for cause and for any reason including, without limitation, the convenience of Brazos County. The term "cause" includes, without limitation: (1) actions which may result in a significant detriment to Brazos County, (2) the material breach of this Agreement, (3) the failure to carry, maintain or otherwise provide evidence CGL has procured the insurance required by this Agreement, (4) The failure to timely perform the Services, (5) the failure to provide the Deliverables as required by this Agreement, and (6) the failure to pay third parties after receipt of payment from the Brazos County as required by Section 5.5. On the effective date of termination or suspenslion CGL has a duty to immediately cease further performance of the Services and promptly take such actions as are reasonably required to secure the Deliverables. Within seven (7) days following receipt of notice of termination or suspension, CGL has a duty to: (a) deliver to Brazos County originals of the Deliverables (whether or not completed) together with all confidential information and other documents which are the property of Brazos County, and (b) submit to Brazos County a final invoice through the effective date of termination or suspension. Brazos County's obligation to pay CGL's final invoice is conditioned upon receipt of the Deliverables (current as of the effective date of termination or suspension). 10.0 DISPUTES 10.1 Definitions. The following definitions apply: (1) "Applicable Law" means the laws of the state of Texas (2) "Dispute" means any controversy, claim, cause of action, demand, or other dispute arising out of relating to this Agreement or the Project, (3) "Forum" means the American Arbitration Association, (4) "Rules" mean the construction industry rules of the Forum, current on the earliest date notice of a Dispute is given or received by a party, and (5) "Venue" means the city, state/providence, and country of the Brazos County office designated in the preamble to this Agreement. 10.2 Other Duties. Any Dispute that is not subject to Section 10.2 is resolved as follows: 1. Applicable Law Venue & Jurisdiction. Applicable Law controls the interpretation and performance of this. Agreement, exclusive of any conflict of Law provisions. Venue for any litigation proceedings related to this Agreement is Brazos County. 2. Mediation. Disputes are initially referred to nonbinding mediation as a condition precedent to any further dispute resolution proceedings. Bi•azos County and CGL will mutually agree to the appointment of a mediator within ten (10) days following a party's demand for mediation or, if the parties are unable to reach agreement withinsuch time period, the Forum will appoint a mediator with experience in mediating complex construction -related disputes. Brazos County and CGL will share equally in the cost of the mediator. Mediation will occur no more than thirty (30) days from the date the mediator is appointed. If a Dispute is settled through mediation, the terms of settlement must be reduced to writing and signed by Brazos County and CGL. If the parties fail to reach agreement within thirty (30) days follow ng appointment of the mediator, then either party may submit the Dispute to arbitration or litigation in accordance with this Article. 3. Litigation._Disputes which are not resolved through mediation may be=finally resolved by litigation in a Texas court of competent jurisdiction residing in the Venue. Brazos County and CGL mutually submit to the personal jurisdiction of such courts. Notwithstanding terms to the contrary, all Disputes seeking injunctive relief as the sole remedy are resolved by litigation in accordance with this Section. 10.3 Limitations. Resolution of a Dispute commences a reasonable time following the occurrence of an event, condition, or circumstance giving rise to the Dispute; provided, however, in no event will either party initiate arbitration or litigation after the date when legal or equitable proceedings based on such Dispute would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Brazos County and CGL agree that tolling of limitation period on causes of action by either party for indemnification under this Agreement commences to run on the date the party seeking indemnification actually incurs a quantifiable loss (exclusive of related attorneys' fees, court/arbitration costs and other related expenses). 10.4 Continued Performance. Pending resolution of any Dispute, CGL has a duty to continue performing the Services in accordance with this Agreement. Brazos County will continue to pay CGL properly due and undisputed amounts owed under this Agreement. 10.5 Consolidation and Joinder. CGL hereby unconditionally consents to consolidation and joinder in any dispute resolution proceeding in which Brazos County is a party and the matter in controversy results, in whole or in part, from the actual or alleged act, error, or omission of CGL. 11.0 COMPLIANCE WITH ANTI-BRIBERY/ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS CGL acknowledges that it is familiar with and shall comply with all Texas statutes prohibiting bribery and corrupt practices. CGL is deemed to have breached this Agreement (which Brazos County may immediately terminate)' it is shown that CGL participated in: (1) offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting anything of value with a view to influencing the behavior or action of anyone, whether a public official or otherwise, directly or indirectly in the selection process or in the performance of Services under this Agreement, (2) a misrepresentation of facts in order to influence a selection process or the execution of a contract to the benefit of CGL and/or Brazos County, including the use of collusive practices intended to stifle or reduce the benefits of free and open competition, or (3) any other violation of Applicable Law. 11.2 CGL warrants and represents the following are true statements and will remain true during performance of the Services: (1) CGL is authorized and duly gtalified to perform the Services required in this Agreement, (2) none of CGL's personnel are foreign or domestic government employees, official or other representatives, (3) no money paid or thing of value given to CGL by Brazos County will be paid, given, or otherwise transferred directly or indirectly to any foreign or domestic government, employee, official or other representative, (4) CGL is not in material violation of any laws, ules, or imposed, asserted, or threatened against CGL under any foreign, federal, state, lo al, or other law, or regulation relating to employment immigration, foreign, or domestic corrupt practices or the avoidance of assertion of any such citation, fine, or penalty. CGL will promptly notify Brazos County in writing if circumstances arise that would cause any of the foregoing statement to become false at any time during performance of the Services. 12.0 AUDIT RIGHTS 12.1 Fora period of three (3) years following completion of the Serves required by this Agreement, CGL has a duty to maintain accurate and complete records of all transactions, gifts, donations, contributions, correspondence and other matters related to the Project and this Agreement (collectively referred to as "Consultant Records"). Consultant Records will be kept in accordance with Generally Accepted A4counting Principles and, will include by way of example and not limitation, proper and complete documentation of all funds received and paid by CGL for any purpose related to the Project and/or this Agreement. All amounts received and paid by CGL will be sups orted by timesheets, invoices, receipts, and such other documents as may be necessary to determine how such funds are used by CGL and its third party payees. CGL will male Consultant Records available to Brazos County, its agents, auditors, representativels and other designees for review, inspection, and audit at anytime during normal business hours at CGL's office - referenced in the preamble to this Agreement. 13.0 MISCELLANEOUS 13.1 Severability. If any provision or part of a provision of this Agree Trent is determined to be superseded, invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable under any Applicable Law or court order, such determination will not impair or otherwise affect the validity, legality; or enforceability of the remaining provision. or parts of the provision -of the Agreement, which remain in full force and effect as if the unenforceable provisio I or part were deleted. 13.2 No Waiver. The failure of either party to insist, in any one or more instances, on the performance of any obligation or right under the Agreement doles not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of such obligation or right with respect to future performance. 13.3 Independent Contractor. CGL is an independent contractor, not an employee of Brazos County. Without limiting the foregoing, CGL acknowledges and agrees that Brazos County will not include employees of CGL in any of its employee benefit plans and CGL will pay taxes on payments received. 13.4 Successors and Assigns. Brazos County and CGL, respectively, bind themselves, their partners,'successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither Party will assign, sublet; or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other, provided. 13.5 Consultant. No portion of the Services may be contracted to any other party without the prior written consent of Brazos County. In the event of such consent is given, CGL must include in all contracts terms and conditions which bind each consultant to CGL to the same extent CGL is bound to Brazos County in this Agreement'ncluding, but not limited to, the payment, indemnification, dispute resolution and audit terms. Nothing contained in this Agreement creates a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either CGL or Brazos County. 13.6 Federal Contracts. The following apply to all agreements in which the Brazos County or end user is the United States.Government. The Equal Employment Opportunity Clause required under Executive Order 11246, the affirmative action commitment for disabled veterans and veterans of the Vietnamese era set forth in 41 CFT 60-250.5, the affirmative action commitment for disabled veterans and other protected veterans, set forth in 41 CFR 60-300.5, the affirmative action clause for disabled workers, set forth in 41 CFR 60-741.5, and the related regulations of the Secretary of Labor, 41 CFR Chapter 60, are incorporated by reference in this Agreement. By accepting this Agreement, CGL certifies that it complies with the authorities cited above and that it does not maintain segregated facilities or permit its employees to perform services at locatiois where segregated facilities are maintained, as required by 41 CFR 60-1.8, if applicable. 13.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which is deemed an original. When proving this Agreement, it is only necessaryto produce or account for the counterpart signed by the party against whom the proof is being presented. 13.8 Notices & Authorized Representatives. Notices are sufficient i in writing and delivered by hand, email, or by regular mail to the authorized representative of the other party; notices sent by regular mail will also be transmitted by facsimile or email at the time of mailing. Unless otherwise designated in writing, the signatories to this Agreement are the parties authorized representative for ail purpose. 13.9 Confidentia Materials. All materials provided to CGL by the County that the County designates as confidential must be returned to the County at tie close of the project. CGL may not make copies of confidential materials without the expressed approval of the County. Any and all copies of confidential materials will be returned to the County at the close of the project. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] I This Agreement is accepted for: CGL Management Group, LLC: By: /a.:.1 3e6 .2, Title: Executive Vice President Date: July 24, 2024 This Agreement is accepted for: Brazos Cou By: Title: _ Date: C O U hl r-1 Ji.trz,GE ul.,q 3®1-aoa4. 5200 Waterford District Dr. Ste 430. Miami. FL 200 S. Texas Ave.. Ste 352. Bryan. TX 77803 (Address) 217-414-9895 (Address) c -v g&,17 Li -1 O a (Telephone) '(Telephone)' July 2, 2024 Brazos County Purchasing Departments 200 S. Texas Ave., Suite 352 Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Request for Proposal No. CIP 24-620 Staffing Analysis for Brazos County Detention Center To the Members of the Selection Committee, CGL is excited to submit this proposal for consideration to conducta staffing analysis for the Brazos County Detention Center. With decades of expert nce working across various counties in Texas, CGL has successfully completed over 60 projects within the state. This extensive experience has equipped us with a deep understanding of Texas standards, local policies, and the unique demands of detention center management in the state. Our firm is dedicated to the criminal justice market and specie lizes in providing real solutions to complex issues specific to detention and justice operations and facilities. Our team includes former corrections administrators, wardens, jail administrators, detention officers, and deputy chiefs. These experienced practitioners fork with CGL's seasoned planners, architects, construction, and maintenance professionals to provide our unique 360 Justice Approach. We recognize that no two criminal justice systems are alike, nd each has unique aspects and circumstances which need to be considered in planning, staffing, and operations. A distinct advantage CGL brings to the table is the volume of work completed in systems throughout the United States in various stages of planning and evaluation. This ensures our experts remain on the cutting edge of best practices and industry trends in real time. Our team members have evaluated the needs of some of the most complex correctional, law enforcement, courts, and jail systems across the nation. Team members have extensive practical experience working in complex detention and law enforcement systems and understand the integral role that policies and practice have in staffing needs. This proposal describes our recommended project approach,: schedule, and fee. Additionally, we present a summary of experience on comparable project, comprehensive resumes for our proposed project team, and references. Brian Lee will serve as the project manager and primary contact for this project and can be reached at BLee@CGLcompanies.com. For any contractual inquiries, please reach out to me directly. All information is provided below. We greatly appreciate Brazos County's consideration of our proposal and look forward to the opportunity to work with you. Sincerely, /(ii/ofeit- Karl Becker Executive Vice President, Justice Services CGL Management Group 217-414-9895 I KBecker@CGLcompanies.com CGL Management Group 2626 Cole Ave Dallas, Texas 75204 TA LE OF CONTENTS • 43ip, 44, Vilj, SECTION 1 Project Understanding SECTION 2 Methodological Approach SECTION 3 Experience and Expertise SECTION 4 Project Timeline SECTION 5 Cost SECTION 6 Report Examples SECTION 7 Collaboration and Communications SECTION 8 Forms jAAr' PP {��{ii �F�F`` ([([,� {nn{,� CC CC fir{, {q� ,}F[' EQQE �!" F Y.:. VZ I1 GI r- Experienced Partner Brazos County has recognized the critical need for a thorough staffing analysis to enhance its operational efficiency, safety, and overall effectiveness of their Detention Center. Managing a workforce of 186 full-time and 14 part-time employees responsible for the oversight of approximately 800 inmates daily presents unique challenges. To address these challenges, it is essential to partner with a consultant who not only understands the intricacies of detention center operations but also has extensive experience within the state of Texas. CGL brings decades of experience working with various counties across Texas, having successfully completed over 60 projects within the state. Our long history of collaboration with Texas counties includes projects such as the Tarrant County Staffing Study, Nueces County Jail Needs Assessment, and the Dallas County Facilities Master Plan. These projects have equipped us with a deep understanding of Texas standards, local policies, and the unique demands of detention center management within the state. Our expertise is built on a foundation of consistent performance and a deep commitment to understanding the specific needs of each county we serve. We are familiar with the regulatory landscape and best practices required to ensure compliance with state and federal laws. This extensive background positions us uniquely to provide a comprehensive .staffing analysis tailored to the operational needs and challenges of the Brazos County Detention Center. OEM CGL's approach will involv data collection to capture and distributions. By thor profile and operations, we inefficiencies. Our staffing development phase will provide tailored recommendation and operational efficiency legal compliance. We will benchmarking to ensure sound. detailed project initiation and current staffing levels, schedules, ughly reviewing the facility will identify critical patterns and to ensure optimal safety, security, grounded in best practices and 'so perform a cost analysis and ur recommendations are financially The culmination of our a orts will be a comprehensive final report, outlining our nalysis process, specific staffing recommendation , and a phased implementation plan. Throughout the proj ct, we will maintain clear communication with Braz s County stakeholders, ensuring that our findings and reco,mrnendations are transparent and - actionable. CGL's extensive experienc commitment to excellenc policies, makes us the ide analysis. Our goal is to en the Brazos County Detent more secure environment in Texas, combined with our , and deep understanding of local I partner for this vital staffing ance the operational efficiency of on Center, ensuring a safer and for both staff and inmates. CGL Management Group • 21 Page left blank intentionally. VZ ' 1 A �J JOT- :: i' I 4 -• — `!y ti • L i Section '2 Proven Process One of the primary issues with criminal justice systems across the United States is the challenge of how to invest scarce resources to. achieve the most cost-effective solution to achieve policy objectives. Decision makers need to have sound research, comprehensive analysis, and reliable data to inform the public and make sound policy decisions. Determining staffing needs in a detention setting can be a complicated undertaking, and corrections staffing • requirements are often misunderstood by those outside the system. No two detention facilities are the same and while all must perform the same type of tasks,(housing offenders, meeting basichuman needs, providing access to programs and services, accommodating visitation, etc.), often, how they accomplish these tasks can differ significantly. As a result, there is no nationally fixed staff to inmate ratio to guide the number of staff needed in a jail. The number of staff necessary must be ascertained -on a facility -by -facility basis. Texas has a state standard minimum 1 to 48 and more if deemed necessary. A substantial number of factors impact jail staffing needs including: • Criminal Justice System Policies and Practices: Jails are not isolated; their population levels and operational needs are heavily influenced by the collective actions of other stakeholders in the local criminal justice system. • Facility Layout: The • hysical design of buildings. determines the mini um number of posts required for adequate supervision sf the population. Philosophy: There are two types ment that impact staffing in a Inmate Managemen ' of population manag detention facility. - Direct supervis management, wh contact between assignment of o unit in close proxi on is a method of inmate ch ensures continuing direct nmates and staff by the cers to work inside the housing ity to inmates. With direct supervision, it is i portant to carefully analyze the number of staff required to operate an inmate living area, without jeo ardizing staff safety. - Indirect supe sion facilities are characterized by the presence of b rriers that separate officers from the inmate popultion. Officers observe inmates from a distance separated by a secure barrier, which allows staff to vieW the activities inside the living area depending oh available sightlines. Population Density:' . in a space has signifies tension in a facility, th demands placed upon Inmate Classificatioi in a facility will have a supervision and the le The classification of it security threat (i.e., m security) has a direct i fhe number of inmates housed nt implications for the level of potential for disturbance, and the staff in assuring order. e The type of inmates housed large bearing on the need for vel of risk, present in an institution. mates in terms of their potential ximum, medium, and minimum elation to required staffing. CGL Management Group • 23 Inmate Movement Patterns: The degree of inmate movement and the nature of that movement (escorted or unescorted) relate directly to the degree of control exercised over inmate behavior and the staffing required for that level of control. Transportation Requirements for Court or Medical Services: The frequency with which inmates must be taken out of a facility for purposes such as court appearances, medical services, or other external services will draw significantly on staff resources. • Perimeter and Interior Security Systems: The number and use of technology -based security systems have an important bearing on a facility's required staffing level. Policies and Standards: Standards and local policies have a direct impact on staffing needs. In some jurisdictions, minimum staffing standards guide agencies with ratio of staff to inmates. Texas Administrative code Title 37 Public Safety and Corrections, Part 9 Texas Commission on Jail Standards, Chapter 275 Supervision of Inmates, Rule §275.4 Staff provides some guidance in jail staffing. It dictates no less than 1 jailer per 48 inmates or increment thereof on each floor for direct inmate supervision, but that is not the final word on staff to inmate ratio. Rule §275.4 also states the Texas Commission on Jail Standards may require staffing in excess of the minimum requirements when deemed necessary for provide a safe, suitable, and sanitary facility. • Training Requirements: The degree to which -training activities take staff away from their duties will create a demand for utility or relief staff, or utilization of overtime. CGL Management Group • 24 • Staff Turnover: Vacancies affect the need for and availability of staff to, cover, posts. Excessive turnover can negatively impact operations by resulting in a workforce that lacks experience and requires additional training and supervision. • Division of Responsibility with Civilian Staff: In any institution, there are positions that either do not involve inmate supervision or, while there is direct contact with inmates, do not necessarily require correctional officer training. Examples of.functions that may be provided by either officers or civilians include personal property management, dietary services, classifications, and commissary services. Prioritization of Posts: Management's ability to objectively evaluate facility post requirements and. determine which posts can be safely closed under certain circumstances facilitates the efficient allocation of staff. Leave Usage: Increased leave time usage is a national trend CGL has observed in jurisdictions across the nation. Increased use of leave time directly impacts jail staffing needs. • Past Incidents: Past serious incidents often play a critical role in shaping operational practices: Corrective actions taken after critical incidents can impact staffing needs. • National Standards and Requirements: Evolving national standards such as the Prison Rape Elimination Act and changes relative to restrictive housing have increased the workloads of uniform staff in detention facilities Project Workplan CGL's analysis of jail staffing and system efficiency is designed to identify the definitive custody staffing needs of the county's jail. Our extensive experience in jail systems staffing and operations informs the straightforward, result -driven work plan developed for this project. TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION AND DATA COLLECTION 1.1: Initial Meetings with County Management CGL will hold initial discussions with the Sheriffs and County's project liaisons to: Clarify project objectives Identify data needs and available resources Finalize a collaborative project work schedule Establish protocols for progress reports and communication to keep the project management team fully informed of project developments 1.2: Request and Review Data Our project manager will submit a comprehensive data request to begin reviewing relevant documents quickly. These documents will include:. Strategic plans, mission statements, goals, objectives, and performance measures Recent audits, management letters, and internal audit reports Previous and current management and staffing studies Current and prior year budget information Current staffing levels and authorized positions Facility post -orders Staffing allocation plans and personnel statistics (e.g., turnover, retirements, overtime usage, leave utilization) Historical hiring and resignation data over -a three-year period Annual leave data and training requirements for all employees Program descriptions and performance indicators Organizational charts and staffing assignment information Population and capacity data for the last 24 months Demographic data on the present population, including classification level Current master staff r ster and daily rosters for all shifts for a one -month peri d Civilian staff assignmdnts and data on critical incidents Staffing cost data, including regular salaries, overtime, and associated expenses Current deployment methodology and staff allocation details Detailed descriptions of the jail's physical plant, including layouts and schemati s Relevant policies, pro edures, SOP manuals, and general orders Internal reports and documents detailing staffing and programs Transportation logs 1.3: Stakeholder Engagement To accurately determine staffing needs, CGL will develop an understanding of the Brazos County criminal justice system through data review and stakeholder interviews. Meetings with stakeholders (e.g., sheriff, jail administration, district attorney, public defender, and courts) will aim to: Understand the justice system's impact on jail staffing needs Gather information on decisions within the courts affecting the jail pop lation TASK 2: FACILITY P regarding operations, Comprehensive tours policies, and staffing issues of the jail Evaluation of facility -specific documents (e.g., rosters, post orders, security practices) • Assessment of movements (court, medical, internal escorts) and other scheduled activities • Analysis of factors impacting staffing, including facility design, mission, and population characteristics • Evaluation of potenti�l changes to improve staff efficiency CGL Management Group • 25 Benchmarking against similar counties in cost per inmate, staff per inmate, overtime usage, and leave time usage Review of booking and housing procedures for efficient staff deployment and facility security 2.2: Efficiency in Operations Analysis A professional staffing assessment may reveal inefficiencies or areas needing modification. The assessment will: Identify inefficiencies that can be remedied through additional staff training or new technology Analyze changes in inmate populations, demographics, treatment, and policies affecting current staffing plans Evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency in the use of officers and civilian staff, chain of command, administrative structure, and span of control Develop methodologies to reduce staffing pressures and spending TASK 3: STAFFING DEVELOPMENT 3.1: Develop Facility Post Plan CGL will create a detailed post plan, identifying individual posts based on established shift schedules, workload, and operational/program needs. The plan will: • Review each staffing post or job assignment Compare the recommended post plans with the current post plan Evaluate alternative models and workflows to improve efficiency 3.2: Develop Shift Relief Factor/Development of Staffing Needs CGL will develop an accurate relief factor using National Institute of Corrections standards, considering: • Net annual work hour (NAWH) calculation • Actual system leave data, training practices, and allowable break time "What -if" analysis on changes in workforce seniority impacting staffing needs and costs Impact of significant peaks in retirement on the system 3.3: Determine Facility Staffing Requirements Using the analysis, CGL will develop a recommended staffing plan and post roster, identifying: • Required schedules and hours of coverage for each post • Staff needs for offender transport, court security, medical services, and programs CGL Management Group • 26 • • Cost-effective division of responsibilities between civilian and sworn staff • Staffing needs for support and administrative functions • Maximum number of inmates vs current staffing numbers • Prioritization of mandatory posts TASK 4: COST ANALYSIS AND BENCHMARKING 4.1 Review Overtime Management Practices CGL will review and evaluate overtime usage, identifying: Factors driving overtime usage Measures to better manage and reduce overtime costs Financial comparison of the cost of new employees versus overtime Potential impact of alternative shift schedules 4.2 Cost Analysis The cost analysis will: Compare current staffing practices to proposed practices Develop alternative staffing projections and cost models ' 4.3 Benchmarking and Market Challenges CGL will conduct a local market analysis of salary levels and competing markets, evaluating: • Efficiencies in hiring practices • Reasons for potential employee loss to other markets • Comparative benchmarking with other jurisdictions on inmate -to -staff ratios, overtime use, and leave usage TASK 5: REPORT DEVELOPMENT CGL will develop and submit a draft report addressing the follbwing questions: Is the Sheriffs Office employing the right number of sta for its current population? What is the appropriate staffing level at current and full ccupancy? How many inmates could be safely supervised with the current number of staff? Are the right types of staff deployed to the right assignments? Are posts assigned properly? Is the scheduling of staff and use of overtime efficient and cost-effective? What are the most beneficial ways to balance full-time employees and overtime? What strategies could reduce staffing pressures and overtime? How does the Brazos County Detention Center compare to other facilities in staffing ratios, leave time, and overtime? What are the financial implications of recommended changes in staffing, efficiency analysis, post assignments, and policy changes? What standards guided these recommendations? Based on input from the Brazos County, CGL will revise and submit the final report, and be available to present its findings as required by the county. CGL Management Group • 27 Page left blank intentionally. Unmatched Experience Established in 1974, CGL has since grown into the largest, most comprehensive criminal justice consulting firm in the world. Our vertically -integrated 360 Justice service platform provides justice clients with: • Significant facility cost savings Increased facility life Total understanding of the facility and operations Speed to market with a single -source solution Reduced risk and comprehensive plans that work We are the leading provider of justice management and operations, research, analytics, facility planning, design, program management and maintenance solutions. To date, CGL has worked in more than 900 counties and municipalities, all 50 states, and 20 countries. Owners have turned to us to deliver solutions on more than 2,000 projects and we currently manage maintenance for over 17 million square feet of justice facilities. We are internat. ovally recognized experts in justi a facilities., specializing in f cility planning, design, maintenance, and operations. CGL brings together the top minds in justice planning, design, maintenance, and management. Our team has worked in and alongside criminal justice agencies, dedicating our careers to understanding the corn Dlexities and unique nature of the justice system. From operations experts with firsthand experience as wardens, administrators, and directors of justice facilities and.syste s, to internationally -recognized experts in sustainable just ce practices and criminology, we deliver a 360 approach to ustice. CGL Management Group • 29 STAFFING & OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENTS Maricopa County Sheriff's Department Operational Review Phoenix, Arizona Participated in a study of detention system needs for Maricopa County, Arizona. The project identified staffing needs in all detention facilities and programs, assessed facility utilization strategies, reviewed program effectiveness, and identified strategies to improve operational effectiveness. Tarrant County Jail Staffing Analysis Fort Worth, Texas CGL was contracted to conducted a comprehensive review of staffing needs and efficiencies for the Tarrant County Detention Bureau (TCDB) in Fort Worth, Texas. TCDB is a large detention system with a capacity of 5,000 beds located in five separate correctional facilities as well as a large Support Services Division. Fulton County Jail Staffing Analysis and Medical Program Review Atlanta, Georgia The project examined current staffing levels in all Fulton County correctional facilities, identified the security and operational impact of current staffing practices, and made recommendations on staffing levels required maintain professional operational standards and meet court order requirements. The project also evaluated the county's current contract for medical services at the jail as well as its pending RFP, and make recommendations to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of medical service delivery. Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office Staffing Analysis San Jose, California Conducted a review of staffing and operational issues in the county jail system. The study included both sworn and non -sworn staff. The primary objective of the review was to evaluate current staffing practices relative to current operational workloads, recognized best practices, professional standards, and applicable local, state, and federal policies and regulations. The review also assessed the sheriff's office budget request for the jail system, as well as other issues with an impact on jail staffing requirements and practices. Pierce County Detention Operations Evaluation Tacoma, Washington The project team conducted a performance audit of the county's jail system. The project focused on operational staffing requirements and capacity utilization in jail system facilities. In addition, the project team reviewed facility operations to determine consistency with contemporary best practices in corrections operations and management. Shasta County Jail Operations Review Redding, California Provided a detailed evaluation of the performance of the operations of the Shasta County Jail (SCJ) relative to current operational workload, recognized best practices, professional. standards, and applicable local, state, and Federal policies and regulations. Project activities included a review and analysis of current operational policies and practices; jail program and service delivery; risk management; and the overall performance and efficiency of current jail operations. Sacramento County Adult Correctional System Review Sacramento, California The project assessed the county's adult correctional system operations and provided support in the implementation of cost-effective approaches to reducing offender recidivism and maintaining community safety. Sonoma County Criminal Justice Master Plan Santa Rosa, California Developed a master plan for the future development of Sonoma County justice system facilities and programs. Over the course of the project, CGL documented the county's current use of justice systems programs and facilities, analyzed offender population characteristics and trends, assessed current facility conditions and suitability, projected future service level needs, reviewed current program performance, and made recommendations for future justice system development. The analysis provided the foundation for future facility planning and program development. Philadelphia Department of Prisons Cost Efficiency Review Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Conducted an evaluation of the cost- effectiveness and efficiency of the Philadelphia Department of Prisons (PDP) in managing its budget and addressing operational needs with available resources. The review found that the PDP is a cost-effective user of City of Philadelphia (City) resources within the context of its performance objerjtives and the constraints under which it must operate. While potential oppoirtunities are available to achieve some savings, the overall PDP budget supports an efficient approach to management of the city's correctional system. Montgomery County Jail Operations Review Daytbn, Ohio Directed a review of the operation of the Montgomery County Jail, focusing on facility staffing needs, physical plant conditions, inmate management, health care services, and training. The project team documented current issues in jail operations and made recommendations for improvement to the Montgomery County Justice Committee. CGL Management Group • 31 Orleans Parish Jail Staffing Review New Orleans, Louisiana The project assessed the current security and future staffing at the detention facilities of the Orleans Parish Sheriffs Office (OPSO) and determined the number and allocation of staff required to effectively operate the jail system. Santa Barbara County Public Safety Realignment Program Santa Barbara, California The project assessed the effectiveness of the past five years of Santa Barbara County realignment activities and resulted in a strategic plan to assist and inform the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) that has been formed as part of the realignment effort and the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors. Newport News Facility Operations Risk Assessment Newport News, Virginia This project provided a comprehensive risk assessment of the operation of the Newport News Department of Adult Corrections (also known as the City Farm), a minimum security correctional facility managed by the city that supplies inmate labor for a variety of municipal work projects. The project documented all of the potential vulnerabilities and risks associated with the operation of this facility and evaluated the effectiveness of management strategies to mitigate these risks. Waukesha County Jail Operations Audit Waukesha, Wisconsin Conducted an assessment of the classification and placement functions of Waukesha County Jails including determining the validity of the classification matrix as it was being applied to placement with the housing units of the jail system. Also completed an assessment of the county community programs including the placement and eligibility criteria each alternative and diversion program including the effectiveness of the court pretrial programs. The information obtained from these assessments was utilized to determine the appropriateness of the facility capacity configuration and the appropriateness of unit bed usage and future needs. Tarrant County Jail Staffing Analysis CGL was contracted to conducted a comprehensive review of staffing needs and efficiencies for the Tarrant County Detention Bureau (TCDB) in Fort Worth, Texas.TCDB is a large detention system with a capacity of 5,000 beds located in five separate correctional facilities as well as a large support services division. CGL definitively identified security staffing needs as well as changes in practices and policies consistent with best practices that could improve operational efficiency. An accurate shift relief factor was developed that reflected actual staff leave usage, training, etc. Additionally, CGL assessed the security and operational impacts of each of the existing physical plants to determine whether these facilities design and layout support or hinder operations. Recommendations regarding physical plant modifications were made to improve overall operations. Location Fort Worth, Texas Size 5,000 offenders 5 facilities Completion Date April 2021 Reference Mike Simonds Chief of Staff Tarrant County Sheriffs Office 200 Taylor Street, 7th Floor Fort Worth, Texas 76196 817-884-2050 MESimonds@TarrantCounty. com Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center Staffing Review CGL was selected by Bernalillo County to provide a staffing assessment of the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). This assessment updated and built upon prior staffing assessments of the facility conducted in 2013, 2014, and 2016. The overall goal of the project was to provide an objective, comprehensive assessment of the number of security staff required for the efficient and effective conduct of MDC operations. CGL reviewed all current operational posts at the facility, developed a new relief factor, and made recommendations to refine the current post plan. Additionally, the team developed an analysis of staffing requirements fora facility operating at capacity, and the impact of alternative shift structures on staffing requirements. The MDC was currently budgeted for 496 security Full -Time -Equivalent staff (FTEs). Approximately 36 percent of these positions, primarily correctional officers, were vacant. The review indicated that the operation of the MDC with the existing post plan and relief assumptions, requires 498 positions. CGL produced recommendations to streamline the facility command structure and adjust 3rd shift staffing in Units E and F, consistent with direct supervision principles. The recommended post plan, with an updated relief factor, requires 519 FTEs. Assuming full occupancy of the MDC increases the required staffing level to 575 FTEs. Location Albuquerque, New Mexico Size 600,000 SF 2,190 beds Completion Date September 2022 Reference Julia Rivera Ethics and Compliance Manager 100 Deputy Dean Miera Dr SW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87151 505-839-8982 jurivera@bernco.gov King County Department of Adult & Juvenile Detention Staffing Analysis King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention (DAJD) selected CGL to conduct a review of staffing in the County's adult correctional facilities. The primary objective of the project was to review the DAJD's current staffing practices and policies in context with generally recognized best practices and principles in correctional staff management. The DAJD is managing crisis -level shortfalls in correctional officer staffing. This shortfall is not due to budget cuts but is instead attributable to problems in the recruitment and retention of staff in conjunction with very high levels of staff leave use. The result is a system that struggles to staff basic security posts in its facilities and is forced to rely on overtime to meet operational needs. At the time of the review, the DAJD had 123 vacant correctional officer positions, leaving a total of 380 active officers. The average number of correctional officers on board has dropped precipitously since 2020, falling by 22 percent. The department lost nearly two officers for every one hired during this time. Taking light duty status into account, the DAJD had an effective 29 percent vacancy rate among correctional officers available to be assigned to regular duty. CGL requested large amounts of data from the county including descriptive information; on staffing trends and operational practices, performance and activity measure data, planning documents, management reports, and other documentation of operations and staffing. The team supplemented the written documentation and data provided with information gained from interviews centered around the perceptions of key staffing issues. Finally, the team toured the adult DAJD facilities providing first-hand exposure to the conditions of the facilities and the DAJD's approach to staffing. Location Seattle, Washington Size 3,374 beds Completion Date May 2023 Reference Jennifer R. Albright, PhD Interim Deputy Division Director Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention 206-477-9097 Jennifer.albright@ kingcounty.gov Nueces County Jail Needs Assessment CGL conducted an analysis of the Nueces County Jail system that included an assessment of current physical plant and operating conditions at county jail facilities; a review of the profile of persons committed to the jail, including trends in the size and characteristics of the inmate population, and development of a projection of the future size of the inmate population and demand for jail beds. CGL Management Group • 36 The review concluded that the county needs to replace its current jail facilities. Given their current size, condition, and design, these facilities cannot meet contemporary correctional facility management standards and practices. The amount and type of housing capacity available in these facilities is not sufficient to meet the county's - current and projected needs. Moreover, the facilities lack basic program space required for effective inmate management. Finally, chronically low staffing levels combined with current facility conditions present a significant risk to the county for incidents that could create liability. 00000000 0000000 oaauao0 0x00000 0, Location Corpus Christi, Texas Size 356,000 SF 1,113 beds Completion Date June 2023 Reference Sheriff J.C. Hopper Nueces County Jail 901 Leopard St. Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 361-887-2222 john.hooper a@nuecesco.com Dallas County Detention Center Operations Analysis and Facility Condition Assessment CGL conducted an operational assessment for the following detention facilities: Building A - West Tower Building B — Intake/Release Center North Tower (including Gill -Hernandez Medical Center) South Tower Court Holding — Frank Crowley Courts Building The operational assessment reviewed whether the current design, layout and conditions of the detention facilities support the operational goals and practices of the Dallas County Sheriff's Office. To develop this analysis CGL reviewed relevant documents provided by the Dallas County Facilities Management Division and the Sheriff's Office. CGL staff were on -site for a full week and interviewed detention leadership, toured every floor of every detention facility with facility administrators, observed current practices, and interviewed staff on their posts. The facilities of the Dallas County Criminal Justice Center are uniquely different from one another and reflective of different construction designs to meet the ever- changing needs of a detention system over time. While these facilities may have been designed to meet correctional needs and philosophies at the time of construction, requirements for facilities are ever-changing. In the last 10-20 years alone, changes in national mandates, legal decisions, and societal expectations have made operating a jail more complicated and require increased sophistication. Facility conditions assessments were separately conducted by our engineering partner MEP and our in-house facility maintenance group. Location Dallas, Texas Size 5,000 offenders 5 facilities Completion Date August 2021 Reference Kumar Pilla Deputy Director, Dallas County Facilities Management 600 Commerce, Suite 900 Dallas, Texas, 75202 214-653-6720 Kumar.Pilla@dallascounty. org ) -6troos- rte i JU r�Or"� .ipa ::Jii� :OO 700 'cr ., - CGL is the most experienced firm in the country in providing detailed staffing and efficiency analysis of detention systems and facilities. In the past five years alone, CGL's team has developed staffing analyses in over 30 county jail systems and more than 60 state correctional facilities. Our team of experts are nationally known leaders in detention system operations and staffing analyses. ORGANIZATION CHART BRIAN LEE CPM' CJMCCE Project Manager ELLERY WILLIAMS cam, ccm Operations Analyst ROLLIN COOK Staffing Analyst TRAVIS BIRNEY Research Specialist Length of Service CGL since 2021 25 Years Other Agencies Education Master of Business Administration, University of Phoenix Certifications • Certified Public Manager, Arizona State University Certified Jail Manager, American Jail Association Certified Corrections Executive, American Correctional Association Brian Lee CPM, CJM, CCE Project Manager Brian joined CGL after serving with the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office (MCSO) for 25 years as a Deputy Chief and Detention Officer. -te held several positions at various jail divisions within the agency and was previously the Chairman of the Maricopa County Smart Justice (Re-entry) Council consisting of multiple departments within the Maricopa County criminal justice system. Brian has been active in the reduction of recidivism in the county jail system and promoting more efficient public safety through the use of data and evidence -based practices that address criminal behavior. Brian's hands on experience with day -today operations enable him to evaluate projects in terms of efficiency and effectliveness. Relevant Experience Bernalillo County Jail Staffing Study, Albuquerque, New Mexico Forsyth County Detention and Courthouse Staffing and Deployment, Winston Salem North Carolina Milwaukee County House of Corrections Consulting Staffing Analysis, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Minnesota Department of Corrections Staffing Analysis, St. Paul, Minnesota New Jersey Department of Corrections Staffing Study, Trenton, New Jersey Baltimore Treatment and Therapeutic Owner's Representative, Baltimore, Maryland Berks County Detention Center Owner's Representation, Reading, Pennsylvania Billings Criminal Justice Efficiency and Court Expansion Consulting, Billings, Montana Delaware County Jail De -Privatization Study, Media, Pennsylvania Detroit Detention Consultant Study, Detroit, Michigan District of Columbia, Department of Corrections Correctional Facility Annex, Washington, D.C. Jackson County Detention Center Owrir Representation, Kansas City, Missburi • Lancaster County Correctional Center Owner's Representation, Lancaster, Pennsylvania Marilcopa County Intake, Transfer, Release (ITR) and Detention Facility, Phoenix, Arizona Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Facility Planning, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Salt (Lake County Feasibility Study and Master Plan, Salt Lake City, Utah St. Louis County Department of Justice Services Process and Procedure Review, St. Louis, Missouri Wayne County Justice Center, Detroit, Michigan CGL Management Group • 39 Length of Service CGL since 2023 24 Years Other Agencies Education • Master of Business Administration, Western International University Bachelor in Business Administration, Concordia University Certifications • Certified Professional Manager • Certified Corrections Manager 'roles at previous agency CGL Management Group • 40 Ellery Williams CPM, CCM Operations Analyst Ellery joined CGL after serving with Maricopa County Sheriffs Office (MCSO) for over 24 years. As the Division Commander at the MCSO, Ellery has a proven track record of implementing procedural and policy changes to enhance operations and improve overall job performance. His expertise spans across multiple areas within the detention division, including towers jail division, court operations division, transportation, inmate programs and services, and intake, transfer, and release division; making him an expert in corrections and detention operations management. Relevant Experience Forsyth County Detention and Courthouse Staffing and Deployment, Winston Salem North Carolina Baltimore Treatment and Therapeutic Owner's Representative, Baltimore, Maryland Louisville Metro Local Corrections Assessment & Strategy, Louisville, Kentucky Peoria County Jail Master Plan, Peoria, Illinois Salt Lake County Feasibility Study and Master Plan, Salt Lake City, Utah Stevens County New Justice Center Programming, Colville, Washington Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Strategic Facility Planning Consulting Services, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Georgia Department of Corrections Operations Review, Atlanta, Georgia Division Commander, Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Phoenix, Arizona* Detention Lieutenant, Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Phoenix, Arizona* Detention Sergeant, Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Phoenix, Arizona* Detention Officer, Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, Phoenix, Arizona* Length of Service CGL since 2024 32 Years Other Firms Education Master of Business Administration, University of Phoenix Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice Administration, Columbia College Professional Affiliations • Member of Correctional Leadership Association (CLA) • Member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police • Member of the National Sheriff's Association Member of the American Jail Association Member of the American Correctional Association Member of Large Jail Network - National Institute of Corrections Member of Utah Sheriff's Jail Commanders Association Criminal Justice Advisory Council Executive Member Salt Lake Valley Law Enforcement and Administrators (LEADS) Member Salt Lake County Behavioral Health Advisory Council *work completed with previous firms Rollin Cook Staffing Analyst Rollin has provided facility leadership in the public safety and corrections market for over 32 years. In his roles as Executive Directoi of the Utah Department of Corrections and Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Corrections, Rollin managed large-scale operations and substantial budgets, overseeing thousands of employees and incarcerated individuals. He has led the construction and transition of state correctional facilities, implemented stab -of -the -art jail management systems, and developed strategic solutions for correctional practice improvements. Rollin's specific areas of expertise include facility assessment, new facility design, construction and transition, safety improvement,1operational enhancement, leadership development, strategic planning, cult re change, and staff engagement. Relevant Experience Project Director/Subject Matter Expert, The Moss Group, Washington, D.C.* Served as the chief architect of the strategy and solution design to address client goals through critical thinking, knowledge of evidence - based correctional practice, creativity, professional experience, and close collaboration with agency and facility leadership. Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Corrections, Statewide Connecticut* Led day-to-day operations of the organization, 7,000 employees, 12,000+ incarcerated citizens, 5,000+ paroled individuals under community supervision, and 14 state correctional facilities. Manage the annual budget of over $700 million. Executive Director, Utah Department of Corrections, Salt Lake City, Utah* Managed construction and transition of new state correctional facilities. Also led day-to-day operations for twelve divisions, 2,200 employees, 7,000+ incarcerated citizens, 15,000+ supervised individuals, and the operations of five community corrections centers, Adult Probation and Parole, and multiple state correctional facilities. Managed an annual budget of over $315 million. Chief Deputy, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office, Salt Lake County, Utah* Procured and transitioned a state- of-the-art jail management system. Also led day-to-day operations for six divisions, 700+ employees, more than 2200 incarcerated citizens, and operations of two Direct Supervision jails Managed an annual budget of over $68 million. Execitive Leadership, Rollin Cook Consulting, Statewide, Utah* Criminal Justice, Corrections and Public Safety Consultant providing consulting and expert witness in all areas of Corrections, including effective jail management and operations, preventing liability, risk management, direct dupervision prisoner management, facility security, staffing, transitioning to a new facility and effective prisoner programming. CGL Management Group • 41 Length of Service CGL since 2024 27 Years Other Firms Education • Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy, Yale University Additional Training • U.S. Border Patrol Agent Training, Charleston, South Carolina DEA Special Agent Training, Quantico, Virginia *roles with previous agencies CGL Management Group • 42 Travis Birney Research Specialist Travis has more than 27 years of experience in tactical operations, complex investigations, and international law enforcement training. He is a trusted partner to government agencies, law enforcement, and private organizations, and he brings a unique approach to leadership and problem -solving. Travis's extensive background includes supervising diverse teams, conducting investigations, training, financial planning, public relations, and ensuring legal compliance. Travis retired as a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Supervisory Special Agent and previously served as a Border Patrol Agent. During his career, he was stationed in seven different offices and engaged in extensive foreign travel representing the DEA. Relevant Experience Virginia Department of Corrections Staffing Study, Richmond, Virginia Salt Lake County Detention Center Feasibility Study & Master Plan, Salt Lake, Utah Louisville Metro Jail Operations and Facilities Review, Louisville, Kentucky District of Columbia Department of Corrections Correctional Facility Annex, Washington, D.C. Jackson County New Facility Owner's Representative, Kansas City, Missouri Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Strategic Facility Plan, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Sacramento County Intake, Trasfer, Release & Mental Health Peer Review, Sacramento, California Bridgeport and New Haven Court House Study, New Haven, Connecticut Supervisory Special Agent, Supervisor of Special Projects - Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Phoenix, Arizona* Special Agent, Tactical Diversion Squad - Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Phoenix, Arizona* Special Agent, Enforcement Group - Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Billings, Montana* Special Agent, Strikeforce Group - Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Houston, Texas* Special Agent Instructor - Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Quantico, Virginia* Assistant Country Attach�, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Kabul, Afghanistan* Special Agent - Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Nogales, Arizona* Special Agent Trainee - Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Quantico, Virginia* U.S. Border Patrol Agent, United States Border Patrol, San Diego, California* I I I I ' { [tllEll'Ll-LUL III ILittt frfT Till :et.E1 mismi LIMA lI Ir-- / ..„.- �.`, . i 41 11 - u_diciL.L; i • 't I L.? Proposed Schedule Our schedule is based on contract award in August 2024 and completion in October 2024 (approximately 90 consecutive calendar days). We have included time for client reviews throughout the process to efficiently complete all five tasks leading to the final deliverable. During the kick-off meeting we will discuss any specific deliverable deadlines necessary to inform other items (such as budget) and adjust the schedule to accommodate those needs. TASK Project Award Task 1.0 Project Initiation &.Data'Collection ',Task 2.0 Facility Profile & Operations Review Task 3.0 Staffing Development Task 4.0 Cost Analysis Task 5.0 Report Development LEGEND Task Duration Client Review o Meetings • Deliverable * August i September October * ♦ Kick-off Meeting Draft Report Draft Report Presentation Final Report Final Report Presentation CGL Management Group ® 43 _ VZ 1• r- _ i • w G.1 P'roject,Manager Operational Analyst Rate: $240 Staffing Analyst Research Specialist Rate: $225 hours cost 'Rate: hours' $260 cost hours cost Cost Proposal Our cost proposal is developed by determining the number of hours each team member needs to accomplish each task in our scope of work and then applying our hourly rates. We have estimated a total of 3 trips and 14 days on -site for this project. The first trip will include the Project Manager and Operational Analyst kicking off the meeting and staying on -site for operational and physical plant reviews (Task 1.0 and 2.0). The second on -site visit will be the Project Manager presenting the draft report and the third on -site visit 1�,� is the Project Manager and Operational Analyst presenting the final report and findings (Task 5.0). i Rate:, hours' $240: cost' hours cost Travel &' • Reimbursable, . Total : T.ask.1 0 Project,Jn tiation,.&..Data Collection gicko ff,Meeting^with County 12 Data•Reg4est and Review 2 $520 8 $2,080 8 $2,080 2 8 8 $480 , $1,920 $1,920 2 $450 4 $900 8 $1,800 6 20 24 $1,450 $4,900 $5,800 . $1,450' $896 $4,900 - -- $5,800 1;3.Stakeholder Engagement _Task 2.0,Facility'Profile & Operatibns'Review 21 Site Visit/Operations Review. 2,2 Efficiency in Operations Analysis 'Task 3.0 Staffing Development, 8 $2,080 $2,080 24 8 $5,760 $1,920 $1,920. 32 24 $7,840 $5,920 $2,687' • $7,840 $5,920 31 Develop Facility Post Plan 7 k Development of5RF 8 • 8 $2,080 $2,080 $2,080 $1,920 $1,920 , $1,920 16 16 16 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 33 Determine Staffing Re'quirements Task 4.0 Cost Analysis ;4.1 Review Overtime Management. ,_4;2Cb s t,Apta lys i s 4'3 Benchmarking and Market Challenges 4 4 4 $1,040 $1,040 $),040 Task 5.0 Report. Development $2,687 S)Draft Reporting '`,52. Presenting, '5.3 Final Reporting. TOTAL 24 8 16 118 $6,240 $2,080 $4,160 $30;680 8 $1,920 8 $1,920 8 $1,920 74 $17,760 48 $1,920 $1,920 $11,520 8 $1,800 8 $1,800 8 $1,800 8 $1,800 4 $900 2 $450 52 $11,70,0 12 12 12 48 20 34 292 $2,840 $2,840 $2,840 • $11,880 54,900 $8,450 $71;660 $2,687 $6,270 $2,640 $2,840. $2,840 $11,880 $4,900 $8,450' $71,660 .$77,930 CGL Management Group • 45 Page left blank intentionally. 0 Customer Service Approach and Communication Plan We develop a communication plan that is based on our criminal justice expertise and cater it to the needs of your community. Our communication outreach team will create a thorough communication plan to assist the county in communicating the vision for the project while building the necessary trust and transparency with your constituents and community partners. The plan will communicate the mission, guiding principles,. and best practices that will be integrated into the project with a clear and consistent message. Our team brings a unique combination of technical expertise and civic engagement skills to protect the integrity of your project. Building trust and transparency for the county's process, a communication plan will be an integral piece of the overall project. We have organized the communication plan into four key components: 1. Storytelling 2. Project Management Support 3. Stakeholder Communication ABILITY TO PRESENT COMPLEX INFORMATION At the conclusion of our aialysis, our team will develop a series of recommendations for the county's consideration regarding the operations team will clearly present relevant stakeholders in a collaboration, and probler One example of this was it CGL facilitated a compreh community groups, and lo and alternatives to resolve community focus group s interviews and a social me In Montgomery County, 0 appointed Citizen Oversig conditions in the County to the public, community. officials. t the county's pre-trial jail. Our ur findings to Brazos County open forum for discussion, -solving efforts. Benton County, Oregon, where nsive initiative to brief the public, cal officials on jail conditions, issues, the issues. The initiative included ssions, public hearings, stakeholder dia campaign. io, CGL collaborated with an �t Board to investigate current it and present potential solutions roups and local government CGL Management Group • 299 inumirainuminliv- REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP NO. CIP 24-620 Staffing Analysis for Brazos County Detention Center SEALED PROPOSALS TO BE SUBMITTED EFORE: Tuesday, July 2, 2024, at 2:00pm CS TO THE: BRAZOS COUNTY PURCHAS NG DEPARTMENT 200 S. T xas Ave. Suite 3.52 Bryan, TX 77803 Phone: (979) 361-4290 Fax: (979) 361-4293 Respondents, their employees and/or representatives are prohibited from ontacting any official or employee of Brazos County, except the Purchasing Agent, regarding s solicitation from the issuing date of the solicitation until scheduled oral presentations or the d to the Brazos County Commissioners Court meets to consider ward of the RFP. Any such cont ct will be grounds for rejection of the respondents' proposal. In compliance with this solicitation, the undersigned proposer having exmined the solicitation and specifications and being familiar with. the conditions to be met, hereb submits the following proposal for furnishing the material and/or services listed on the attach = d form and agrees to deliver said items at the locations and fo the prices set forth herein. 1 Company Name: CGL Management Group, LLC • By (Print): Karl Becker Title: Executive Vi e President Physical Address: 5200 Waterford District Drive, Suite 430, Miami, FL 33126 Mailing Address: 5200 Waterford DistrL Drive, Suite 430, Miami, FL 33 26 Telephone: 217.414.9895 Fax: 770.716.9081 0 E -Mail: kbecker@cglcompanies.com CGL Management Group • 301 A. SOLICITATION SCHEDULE Release of RFP Advertisement Dates Deadline for Questions Proposal Submission Deadline Review/Contract Evaluations/Negotiatior s Anticipated Award Tuesday, June 4, 2024 Tuesday, June 4, 2024 Tuesday, June 11, 2024 Tuesday, June 25, 2024 at 5:00 PM CST Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 2:00 PM CST July August B. SUMMARY OF WORK The Brazos County Detention Center is looking to hire a contractor to complete a staffing analysis of their department that consists, of 186 full-time employees and 14 part-time employees that oversee an average of 800 inmates daily. The following tasks are to be completed. 1. Conduct a thorough analysis of current staffing levels, schedules, and distributions. 2. Determine the optimal staffing levels for safety, security, and efficiency, considering inmate population and operational changes. 3. Ensure recommendations comply with applicable state and federal laws and, best practices. 4. Analyze historical staffing data for trends in shift patterns; leave records, and overtime. 5. Collect and review operational data, including inmate -to -staff ratios and incident reports. 6. Gather insights from jail staff, administration, and:possibly inmates through interviews and/or surveys. 7. Evaluate workload for various staff roles and shifts. 8. Identify inefficiencies in the current staffing model. 9. Use data -driven models for scenario planning. 10. Develop recommendations for staffing levels and policy changes. 11. Create a phased implementation plan for recommendations. C. REQUIRED DELIVERABLES The following are deliverables required'of the awarded vendor: 1. Interim reports detailing progress and preliminary findings on agreed upon intervals (e.g.. biweekly) 2. A comprehensive final report outpining: a. Analysis process and findings, to include staffing level gaps, overlaps, inefficiencies and "leave as -is". b. Specific staffinglevel recommendations for each area of responsibility or position. c. Policy and procedure change recommendations. d. A clear, phased, implementation plan recommendations. 3. Two (2) presentations of findin-gs to key stakeholders (for example, the Sheriff's Office Staff and/or Commissioners Couit) 4. Question and answer sessions fo clarifications and concerns. _ 5. Follow-up support or consultatiop availability for implementation phase. D. CONDITIONS OF RFP The following instructions apply to all proposals and become a part of Terms and Conditions of any proposal submitted to the Brazos County Purchasing Department, unless otherwise specified CGL Management Group O 302 21 Page elsewhere in this Proposal. All Contractors are required to be inform Conditions and will be held responsible for having done so: of these Terms and 1. Definitions: In order to simplify the language throughout this p oposal, the following definitions shall apply: a. BRAZOS COUNTY - Same as County. b. COMMISSIONERS' COURT - The elected officials of Brazos County, Texas given the authority to exercise such powers and jurisdiction of a l county business as conferred by the State Constitution and Laws. c. CONTRACT - An agreement between the County and a Ven or to furnish supplies and/or services over a designated period of time during which epeated purchases are made of the commodity specified. d. CONTRACTOR - The successful Contractor(s) of this proposa request. e. COUNTY - The government of Brazos County, Texas and its authorized representatives. f. SUB -CONTRACTOR - Any contractor hired by the Contracto or Supplier to furnish materials and services specified in this proposal request. g. SUPPLIER - Same as Contractor 2. Brazos County will follow the Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 262.030 for this RFP process. The proposals will be opened on the date and time mentioned above and only the names. of the proposers will be read aloud. The proposal the evaluation committee and this committee will evaluate each prc criteria set forth in this RFP. The committee will determine evaluated firms will be negotiated with depending on the scores discretion of Brazos County. Tithe County chooses, these top scor an opportunity to present potential value engineering or cost sav'ng suggestions to the County. All firms will be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect toany opportunity for discussion and revision of proposals and no pnci g will be shared with any of the firms at any time until after an award is made and c 4 ntract is approved by Commissioners' Court. A best and final offer may be requested i eluding any revisions and allowing for a revision of the completion timeframe for inclusion into the fmal contract. will be distributed to posal according to the Low many of the top ndother factors at the ng firms will be given 3. Upon acceptance and approval by the Commissioners' Court, this part of the contract between Brazos County and the successful C designated. proposal will be made ntractor for the period 4. Proposals must be received by the Purchasing Department prior to the time and date specified. 5. The County reserves the right to accept or reject in part or in submitted, and to waive any technicalities for the best interest of th whole, any proposals County. 6. Brazos County shall not be responsible for any verbal comm ication between 'any employee of the County and any potential Contractor. Only wri en specifications and written price quotations will be considered. 3 I Page CGL Management Group • 303 7. Brazos County reserves the right to reject any proposals that do not fully respond to each specified item. 8. Should there be a change in ownership or management, the contract shall be canceled unless a mutual agreement is reached with the new owner to continue the contract with its present provisions and prices. This contract is nontransferable and non -assignable by either party. 9. The County may cancel this contract at any time for any reason, provided thirty -day written notice is given. 10. The proposal award shall be based on, but not necessarily limited to, the following factors: a. Experience and Expertise 30% b. Understanding of Scope of Work 10% c. Methodological Approach and Timeline 20% d. Cost 25% e. Collaboration and Communication 25% 11. Although the cost is an essential part of the proposal, Brazos County is not obligated to award a contract on the sole basis of cost. 12. Acceptance of work provided shall be made by the County at the sole discretion of the Commissioner's Court when all terms and conditions of the contract and specifications have been met to its satisfaction, including the submission to the County of any and all documentation as may be required. 13. Title and Risk of Loss of the goods shall not pass to Brazos County until the County actually accepts and takes possession of the goods at the point or points of delivery. 14. This agreement shall be governed by the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in the State of Texas as effective and in force on the date of this agreement. 15. No proposal may be withdrawn after opening time without acceptable reason and with the approval of Purchasing Agent. 16. Proposals will not be considered if submitted by telephone, fax, or any other means of rapid dispatch, nor will a proposal be considered if submitted to any other person or department other than specifically instructed. 17. All proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the instructions contained herein. Brazos County will not be liable for any information received through other websites or sources of information. It is the sole responsibility .of the respondent to verify the accuracy of information received from sources other than Brazos County. It is recommended that the respondent check the Brazos Valley e -Marketplace (https://brazosbid.ionwave.net) for addenda prior to submitting their proposal. 4 Page CGL Management Group • 304 18. There is no expressed or implied obligation for Brazos County to reimburse responding service providers for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in response to this request. 19. Proposals must show full company name, mailing address and telephone number and be manually signed by an authorized sales or quotation irepresentative of the Contractor. The company name and authorized signature shall' appear in each space provided. The Respondent must include Employer Identification Number or Social Security Number and signature for the proposal to be valid. 20. Proposals must specify the number of consecutive calendar days required to reach substantial completion of the project under normal conditions; Failure to specify completion time or failure to comply with completion time will' be considered reason enough to cancel the contract. 21. Proposals must be submitted on units of quantity specified. In the event of errors in extended prices the unit price shall govern. In the event of a discrepancy between the numbers given for the price and the word form of the price, the word form shall govern. Any suggested change in quantity on the part of the bidder to secure a better price or delivery is welcomed and may be given consideration provided that the bidder also bids on the quantity specified. 22. It is our policy not to furnish proposal results over the phone. Proposal results and tabulation sheets will be posted on Brazos County website after it is awarded by Commissioners Court. 23. This Proposal will be made part of any resulting contract the County may enter into. The terms and conditions of the County contained in this RFP or the plans for this RFP shall supersede those of the respondent in the event of a conflict. 24. If any provision of this contract shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and enforceable. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that any provision of this contract is invalid or unenforceable, but that by limiting such provision it may become valid and enforceable, then such provision shall be deemed to be written, construed, and enforced as so limited. 25. No oral statements of any person shall modify or otherwise change or affect the terms, conditions or specifications. All change orders to this agreement s all be made in writing and shall not be effective unless signed by an authorized representative of Brazos County. E. SPECIAL PROVISIONS . 1. Respondent with questions regarding the proposal should submit them in writing via the Brazos Valley e -Marketplace at https://brazosbid.ionwave.net. 2. Fill out the proposal completely, identify the proposal name and number on the outside and return it to the Brazos County Purchasing Department, Administration Building, 200 South Texas Ave., Suite 352, Bryan, Texas 77803 prior to the subrunission deadline. The 5 I Page CGL Management Group • 305 proposal is invalid if it is not deposited at the designated location prior to the time and date advertised, or prior extension issued by the County. 3. All proposals shall be prepared on the bid forms located on the Brazos Valley e - Marketplace County web site https://brazosbid.ionwave.net. The proposer must put the proposal number and name on the front of the envelope before mailing it to the Purchasing Department. 4. In addition to the County's proposal form, all proposals shall be accompanied by a Contractor's Qualification Statement (MA Document A-305 or equal) listing five (5) like projects, along with the project's owner and engineer contact information on each project. Please note key individuals means Project Manager and Superintendent for this project. Please be specific on the project commitments in progress and future planned commitments to comply with the requestsof this RFP. 5. During the evaluation process, Brazos County reserves the right, in the best interest of the County, to request additional information or clarification from Contractors. 6. The contract shall be awarded to the responsible Contractor whose proposal is determined to be the best evaluated offer. 7. Responses to this proposal should be clear and concise addressing all requirements listed above and any other factors not specifically mentioned which would be advantageous to Brazos County. 8. Performance Standards: a. All services contracted herein shall be done in a courteous and orderly manner. All Contractor personnel shall be appropriately dressed at all times while on the property. b. The personnel performing the services contracted herein shall be under the sole responsibility and the employ of the Contractor. c. Unless otherwise specifically noted, the Contractor shall provide and pay for all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, and other facilities and services necessary for the proper execution and completion of the work herein contracted to be done. d. The Contractor shall give all notices and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules,. regulations, and order of any public authority in connection with the performance of the work herein to be done. e. The Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining, and supervising appropriate safety precautions and programs in connection with the work herein contracted to be done. The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions for safety of, and shall provide all reasonable protection to prevent damage, injury or loss to: (1) all employees on the project and other persons who may be affected thereby, (2) the project and all materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, and (3) other property at the site or adjacent thereto. F. TRADE SECRETS, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND THE TEXAS PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT 1. Brazos County, Texas is subject to the Texas Publication Information Act, Chapter 552, Texas Government Code. Proposals submitted to Brazos County, Texas in response to 6IPage CGL Management Group • 306 { this RFP are subject to release by the County as public information. If the Proposer believes that the Proposal response, or part of it are confidential, as proprietary information, (s)he must specify that either all or part is excepted arid provide specific and detailed justification for its claim of confidentiality. Vague and general claims to confidentiality are not acceptable. All Proposals or parts of the Proposals which are not marked as confidential will be considered public information aftr a contract has been awarded. The successful Proposal may be considered public information even though parts are marked confidential. 2. Brazos County, Texas assumes no responsibility for asserting legal arguments on behalf of the Respondents. Respondents are advised to consult witch their legal counsel concerning disclosure issues resulting from this proposal process and to take precautions to safeguard trade secrets and other proprietary information. 3. Marking your entire Proposal CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY with the Texas Public Information Act. is not in conformance 4. The requirements of Subchapter J, Chapter 552, Government Code, may apply to this contract and the contractor agrees that the contract can be termi ated if the contractor knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement ofthat subchapter. This provision is mandatory and may not be altered or deleted, as required by Sec. 552.372(b) of the Texas Government Code. G. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 1. The Respondent shall not offer or accept gifts or anything of value nor enter into any business arrangement with any employee, official, or agent of Brazos County. 2. By signing and executing this Proposal, the Respondent certifies' and represents to the County the Proposer has not offered, conferred or agreed to confer any pecuniary benefit or other thing of value for the receipt of special treatment, advantage, information, recipient's decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or any other exercise of discretion concerning this Proposal. 3. With the exception of interviews and other contacts initiated by Brazos County relevant to the selection process, Proposers, their employees or representatives, are prohibited from contacting any official or employee of Brazos County, except:the Purchasing Agent, in regard to this RFP from the issuing date of the RFP until the date the Brazos County Commissioner's Court meets to consider award of the Proposal. Any such contact will be grounds for rejection of the respondent's proposal. H. ADDENDA AND MODIFICATIONS . 1. Any changes, additions or clarifications to the RFP will be made by numbered addenda and must be acknowledged in the Proposal. 2. Any firm in doubt as to the meaning of any part of these requirements may request an interpretation thereof from the Purchasing Agent. At the request of the Proposer, or in the event the Purchasing Agent deems the interpretation to be substantive, the interpretation will be made by written addendum issued by the Purchasing Department. 7 I Page CGL Management Group • 307 Such addendum will be posted on the Brazos Valley e -Marketplace and will become a part of the Proposal package, having the same binding effect as provisions of the original Proposal. No verbal explanation or interpretations will be binding. In order to have a request of interpretation considered, the request must be submitted in writing and must be received by the Purchasing Department no later than the question deadline. 3. All addenda, amendments, and interpretations of this solicitation shall be in writing. Brazos County shall not be legally bound by any amendment or interpretation that is not in writing. Only information supplied by the County in writing or in this RFP should be used in preparing Proposal responses. 4. The County does not assume responsibility for receipt of any addendum sent to Proposers. 5. All addenda must be acknowledged on this form. 6. The Commissioner's Court delegated the right and responsibility for issuing any and all addenda to the Purchasing Agent. I. EXAMINATION OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUIREMENTS 1. Each Proposer shall carefully examine all RFP documents and be thoroughly familiar with all requirements prior to submitting a Proposal. 2. Before submitting a Proposal, each Proposer shall be responsible for making all investigations and examinations that are necessary to ascertain conditions and requirements affecting the requirements of the RFP. Failure to make such investigations and examinations shall not relieve the Proposer of the obligation to comply, in every detail, with all provisions and requirements of the RFP. J. TAXES Brazos County is tax exempt. Tax exemption certificates will be executed by the County upon request. K. INSURANCE The Contractor shall procure and maintain at its sole cost and expense for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, volunteers, employees or subcontractors. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the County; its officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the County, its officials, employees or volunteers shall be considered in excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute to it. Further, the Contractor shall include all subcontractors as additional insured, under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. All Certificates of Insurance and endorsements shall be furnished to the County's Representative and approved by the County before work commences. 8 I Page CGL Management Group • 308 Standard Insurance Policies Required: a. Commercial General Liability Policy b. Automobile Liability Policy c. Worker's Compensation Policy General Requirements applicable to all policies: a. Only insurance carriers licensed and admitted to do business in the State of Texas will be accepted. b. Deductibles shall be listed on the Certificate of Insurance and are acceptable only on a per occurrence basis for property damage only. c. "Claims Made" policies will not be accepted. d. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that clioverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to Brazos County. e. All insurance policies shall be furnished to Brazos County upon request. 1. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY a. General Liability insurance shall be written by carrier with an A:VIII or better rating in accordance with the current Best Key Rating guide. b. Minimum Combined Single Limit of $1,000,000.00 per pccurrence for bodily injury and property damage. c. No coverage shall be deleted from the standard policy without notification of individual exclusions being attached for review and acceptance. d.Excess Liability Umbrella Policy in the amount of not less than $2,000,000.00 will be provided at the Contractors expense. e. Brazos County shall be named as additional insured on Contractors insurance. "Texas Waiver of Our Right to Recover From Others Endorsement" shall be included in this policy. (Waiver of Subrogation) 2. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY i a. General Liability Insurance shall be written by a carrier with an A:VIII or better rating in accordance with the current Best Key Rating Guide. b. Minimum Combined Single Limit of $600,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. 3. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Title 28, Section 110.110 of the Texas compensation insurance policy; either directly through their employer's policy (the Contractor's or subcontractor's policy) or through an executed coverage agreement on an approved TWCC form. Accordingly, if a subcontractor does not have his or her own policy and a coverage agreement is used, Contractors and subcontractors must use that portion of the form whereby the hiring contrac11tor agrees to provide coverage to the employees of the subcontractor. The portion of the form that would otherwise allow them not to provide coverage for the employees of an independent contractor may not be used. The worker's compensation insurance shall include the following terms: 9IPage CGL Management Group • 309 a. Employer's Liability limits of $500,000.00 for each accident is required. b. "Texas Waiver of Our Right to Recover From Others Endorsement" shall be included in this policy. (Waiver of Subrogation) Pursuant to the explicit terms of Title 28, Section 110.110 ( c ) (7) of the Texas Administrative Code, the bid specifications, this Agreement, and all subcontracts on this Project must include the following terms and conditions in the following language, without any additional words or changes, except those required to accommodate the specific document in which they are contained or to impose stricter standards of documentation: a. Definitions: i. Certificate of coverage ("certificate") - A copy of a certificate of insurance, a certificate of authority to self -insure issued by the Texas Worker's Compensation Commission, or a coverage agreement )TWCC-81), TWCC-83, or TWCC-84), showing statutory worker's compensation insurance coverage for the person's or entity's employees providing services on a project, for the duration of the project. ii. Duration of the project - includes the time from the beginning of the work on the project until the Contractor's/person's workon the project has been completed and accepted by the governmental entity. iii. Persons providing services on the project ("subcontractors" in section 406.096 {of the Texas Labor Code) - includes all persons or entities performing all or part of the services the Contractor has undertaken to perform on the project, regardless of whether that person has employees. This includes, without limitation, independent Contractors, subcontractors, leasing companies, motor carriers, owner -operators, employees of any such entity or employees of any entity which furnishes persons to provide services on the project. "Services" include, without limitation, providing, hauling, or delivering equipment or materials, or providing labor, transportation, or other service related to a project. "Services" does not include activities unrelated to the project, such as food/beverage vendors, office supply deliveries, and delivery of portable toilets. b. The Contractor shall provide coverage, based on the proper reporting of classification codes and payroll amounts and filing of any coverage agreements, that meets the statutory requirements of Texas.Labor Code, Section 401.011 (44) for all employees of the Contractor providing services on the project, for the duration of the project. c. The Contractor must provide a certificate of coverage to the governmental entity prior to being awarded the contract. d. It the coverage period shown on the Contractor's current certificate of coverage ends during the duration of the project, the Contractor must, prior to the end of the coverage period, file a new certificate of coverage with the governmental entity showing that coverage has been extended. e. The Contractor shall obtain from each person providing services on a project, and provide to the governmental entity: i. a certificate of coverage, prior to that person beginning work on the project, so the governmental entity will have on file providing services on the project, and certificates of coverage showing coverage for all person; and 10 j Page CGL Management Group 310 ii. no later than seven -calendar days after receipt by the Contractor, a new certificate of coverage showing extension of coverage, }f the coverage period shown on the current certificate of coverage ends during the duration of the project. f. The Contractor shall retain all required certificates of coverage for the duration of the project and for one year thereafter. g. The Contractor shall notify the governmental entity in writing by certified mail or personal delivery, within 10 calendar days after the Contractor knew or should have known, or any change that materially affects the provision of coverage of any person providing services on the project. h. The Contractor shall post on each project site a notice, 'in the text, form and manner prescribed by the Texas Workers' Compensation commission, informing all .persons providing services on the project that they are required to be covered, and stating how a person may verify coverage and report lack of coverage. i. The Contractor shall contractually require each person with whom it contracts to provide services on a project, to: i. provide coverage, based on proper reporting of classification codes and payroll amounts and filing of any coverage agreement, that meets the statutory requirements of Texas Labor Code, Section 401.011 (44) for all of its employees providing services on the project, for the duration of the project; ii. provide to the Contractor, prior to that person beginnin work on the project, a certificate of coverage showing that coverage is being provided for all employees of the person providing services on the project, for the duration of the project; iii. provide the Contractor, prior to the end of the coverage period, a new certificate of coverage showing extension of coverage, ;if the coverage period shown on the current certificate of coverage ends during the duration of the. project. iv. obtain from each other person with whom it contracts, and provide to the Contractor: (a) a certificate of coverage, prior to the other person beginning work on the project; and . (b) a new certificate of coverage showing extension ofr. coverage, prior to the end of the coverage period, if the coverage period shown on the current certificate of coverage ends during the duration of the project; v. retain all required certificates of coverage on file for thee' duration of the project and for one year thereafter; vi. notify the governmental entity in writing by certified mail or personal delivery, within 10 calendar days after the person know or should have known, of any change that materially affects the provision of coverage of any person providing services on the project; and vii. contractually require each person with whom it contracts, to perform as required by paragraphs (a) -(g), with the certificates of cloverage to be provided to the person for whom they are providing services. j. By signing this contract, or providing, or causing to be provided a certificate of coverage, the Contractor who will provide services on the Iroject will be covered by workers' compensation coverage for the duration of the project, that the coverage will be based on proper reporting of classification codes and payroll 11 1-1' a g e CGL Management Group 311 amounts, and that all coverage agreements will be filed with the appropriate insurance carrier, or, in the case of a self -insured, with the commission's Division of Self -Insurance regulation. Providing false or misleading information may subject the Contractor to administrative penalties, criminal penalties, civil penalties, or other civil actions. 4. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE Certificates shall be prepared and executed by the insurance company or its authorized agent, and shall contain the following provisions and warranties: a. The company is licensed and admitted to do business in the State of Texas. b. The insurance policies provided by the insurance company are underwritten on forms that have been provided by the Texas State Board of Insurance or ISO. c. All endorsements and insurance coverage according to requirements and instructions contained herein. d. The form of the notice of cancellation, termination, or change in coverage provisions to Brazos County. e. Original endorsements affecting coverage required by the section 'shall be furnished with the certificates of insurance. L. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW The Contractor's work and materials shall comply with all state and federal laws, municipal ordinances, regulations, and directions of inspectors appointed by proper authorities having jurisdiction. The Contractor shall perform and require all subcontractors to perform the work in accordance with applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of the State of Texas and the United States and other laws as they apply to its employees. In the event any of the conditions of the specifications violate the code for any industry, then such code conditions shall prevail. M. INDEMNITY To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor agrees to and shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the County, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, causes of action, suits, and liability of every kind, including all expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorney's fees for injury to or death of any person, for damage to any property, or for any breach of contract, arising out of or in connection with the work done by the Contractor under this Contract, provided that any such claim, loss, damage, cause of action, suit or liability is caused in whole or in part by an act or omission of the Contractor, any subcontractor, or any person, organization directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform or furnish work on the Project. This indemnity shall apply regardless of whether such injuries, death, damages, or breach are caused in part by the negligence or omission of the County, any other party indemnified hereunder, the Contractor, or a third party. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to the following specific instances: a. In the event the County is damaged due to the act, omission, mistake, fault or default of the Contractor, then the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless and defend the County for such damage. 12 I Page CGL Management Group • 312 b. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless and .defend he County from any claims for payment for goods or services brought by any material suppliers, mechanics; laborers, or other subcontractors. c. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless and defend the County from any and all injuries to or claims to adjacent property owners caused by the Contractor, its agents, employees and representatives. d. The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to the floor, w lls, etc., caused by the Contractor's personnel or equipment. e. The Contractor shall also be responsible for subcontractors hired. f. The -Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the County from any liability caused by the Contractor's failure to comply with applicable federal, state, or local regulations, that touch upon or concern the maintenance of a safe and protected working environment and the safe use and operation of machinery and equipment in that working environment, no matter where fault or responsibility lies. The indemnification obligations of the Contractor under this section shall the liability of any architect, their consultants, and agents or employees out of (1) the preparation or approval of maps, drawings, opinions, rer orders, designs or specifications, or (2) the giving of or the failure instructions by. the architect, their consultants, and agents and employ provided such giving or failure to give is the primary cause of the injury or not extend to include f any of them arising orts, surveys, change to give directions or ees of any of them, damage. N. RELEASE The Contractor assumes full responsibility for the work to be performed ereunder, and hereby releases, relinquishes, and discharges the County, its officers, agents, a d employees from all claims, demands, and causes of action of every kind and character, including the cost of defense thereof, for any injury to or death of any person (whether employees of eit1er:party or other third parties) and any loss of or damage to any property (whether property olf either of the parties hereto, their employees, or of third parties) that is caused by or alleged toy be caused by, arising out of, or in connection with the Contractor's work to be performed hereunder. This release shall apply regardless of whether said claims, demands, and causes of action are covered in whole or in part by insurance, and in the event of injury, death, property damage, or loss suffered by the Contractor, any subcontractor, or any person or organization directly or .indirectly employed by any of them to perform or furnish work on the project, this release shall apply regardless of whether such injury, death, loss, or damage was caused in whole or in pat by the negligence of the County. O. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL 1. The Proposer shall submit the proposal on the forms enclosed on t e Brazos County web site. All blank spaces in forms shall be correctly filled in by typew ter or manually in ink and the proposer shall state the prices., 2. If a proposal is submitted by .an: individual, his name must be sign authorized agent. If the proposal is submitted by a firm, associati name and address of each member must be given, and the proposal official or duly authorized agent. d by him or his duly n, or partnership, the must be signed by an 13 I Page COL Management Group • 313 3. The following items should be completed and included in your proposal submission. Failure to include these items will disqualify your proposer. i. Completed and signed RFP including: a. References (Section R) b. Certification of Proposal (Section U) ii. Pricing proposal as a Unit Price iii. Timeline and methodology for completion of the final report iv. Example of a report from a similar size and scope project v. Sample Contract between proposer and Brazos County 4. The Proposer shall submit one . (1) original of completed " RFP with appropriate signature(s). This should' include any pricing, references, specified qualifications, etc. The Proposer shall also submit five (5) copies of the qualification statements- in their proposal packet. The five copies should NOT include the RFP or pricing; but should include. 5. By signing the certification below, the respondent verifies that all plans - and. specifications have been reviewed and are considered in the pricing attached. Prior to award, the respondent also completes the Verification of No Delinquent Taxes or Fees form (V.T.C.A. LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE §262.0276), Legislative Certification Form, and the Disclosure of Interested Parties (1295). These are all available on the Brazos County Purchasing website. P. PROPOSAL COMPOSITION 1. Summarize your understanding of the project. 2. Describe your approach for accomplishing the necessary tasks and lessons learned from previous similar projects. 3. Provide the resume for all contractor staff that will be.working on this project. 4. Provide an estimated timeline of events from beginning to end of the contract. This should include a detailed list of the tasks and expected duration for each task. 5. Provide a Pricing Proposal as a Unit Price for this project. In this Proposal shall have the milestones in which payments should be made. 6. Provide one example of an initial report and final report for a comparably sized jail, preferably in Texas. 7. Discuss the communication plan with Brazos County personnel. Q. EVALUATION CRITERIA ... 1. Criteria for evaluating the proposals is requested with the following (but not limited to): a. Experience and Expertise (30 Points): i. Proven track record in conducting similar staffing analyses. ii. Specific experience with correctional or law enforcement facilities preferred. 14 I Page CGL Management Group • 314 Company/Entity: Nueces County, Texas Contact: Sheriff J.C. Hopper Phone: 361-887-2222 Email: john.hooper@nuecesco.com Company/Entity: Bernalillo County, New Mexico Contact: Julia Rivera, Ethics and Compliance Manager Phone: 505-839-8982 Email: jurivera@bernco.gov Company/Entity: King County, Washington Contact: Jennifer R. Albright, PhD, Deputy Division Director Phone: 206-477-9097 Email: Jennifer.albright@kingcounty.gov 16 I Page CGL Management Group • 316 iii. Understanding of state and federal regulations affecting staffing in correctional settings. b. Methodological Approach (20 Points): i. Clarity and appropriateness of proposed methodology for conducting the staffing analysis. ii. Evidence of data -driven and comprehensive analysis techniques. iii. Timeline mapping out your approach with milestones to better understand the proposer's methodology. c. Cost (25 Points): i. Overall cost-effectiveness of the proposal. ii. Transparency and detail in budget breakdown, including any potential additional costs. d. Collaboration and Communications (25 Points): i. Plans for engaging with jail staff, administration, and other stakeholders during the project. ii. Ability to present complex information clearly and effectively. R. REFERENCES Respondents shall provide a list of at least five (5) references, where work comparable in quality and scope to that specified has been performed within the past five (5) years. This list should include the names, phone number and email of the company/entity for which the prior work was performed to contact these references. References received on previous solicitations for similar size and scope in the previous six (6) months may be considered in lieu of obtaining a new reference check. A negative reference may be grounds for disqualification of bid. Respondents are not allowed to use Brazos County as a reference. Company/Entity: Tarrant County, Texas Contact: Mike Simonds, Chief of Staff Phone: 817-884-2050 Email: MESimonds@TarrantCounty.com Company/Entity: Dallas County, Texas Contact: Kumar Pilla, Deputy Director Phone: 214-653-6720 Email: Kumar.Pilla@dallascounty.org 15 j Page CGL Management Group • 315 T. ADDENDA The undersigned acknowledges responsibility for all addenda issued prior to closing date. No addenda will be issued less than 48 hours prior to the solicitation submission deadline. No. Date No. Date No. Date U. CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL The undersigned affirms that they are duly authorized to execute this contract, that this proposal has not been prepared in collusion with any other Contractor, and that the contents of this proposal have not been communicated to any other Contractor prior to the official opening. Signed By: ,r4/(GA, Title: Executive Vice President Typed Name: Karl Becker Company Name: CGL Management Group, LLC Mailing Address: 5200 Waterford District Drive, Suite 430, Miami, FL 33126 P.O. Box or Street' City State Zip Employer Identification Number: 45-5329984 CORPORATE SEAL IF SUBMITTED BY A CORPORATION END OF RFP NO. CIP 24-620 By signing below, Brazos County agrees that this RFP CIP 24-620 will be awarded to the respondent whose name appears above and both parties agree to the terms and conditions contained herein. By: Brazos County Commissioner's Court Date: --JILL_L( ©c a cp 024, Attest: Brazos County Clerk ()- 6121O-11:?-1�-- 18IPage CGL Management Group • 300 CIP 24-620 Staffing Analysis for Brazos County Detention Center Points Corrections Consulting Services, LLC a. ° " ' `►�' G o u p, Justice Planners a. Experience and Expertise 30 24 25 b. Understanding of Scope of Work 10 9 9@ 7 c. Methodological Approach and Timeline 20 15 : 11E3 16 d. Cost $69,500.00 ma'am a $63,112.00 25 23 25 e. Collaboration and Communication 25 23 Z`', 15 Total 110 95 . fll l 88 Committee Recommended Award: CGL Management Group, LLC Approved by CoCourt on this 30 day of �� 1=A , 2024 by ding the position of C Our`( D&E- BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Road and Bridge NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: 7/30/2024 ITEM: TO: FROM: DATE: FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGETED: DOLLAR AMOUNT: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description Permit-Wellborn-12318_North Dowting.pdf Utility Permit - Wellborn SUD - North Dowling Road CC-2024-Wellbom SUD-12318 North Dowling Consider and take action on the Wellbom SUD utility permit to construct a road bore at 12318 North Dowling Road to provide water service. Site is located in Precinct 1. Commissioners Court Joe Salvato 07/25/2024 False False $0.00 Type Backup Material Duane Peters County Judge 130101q - Date APPLICATION FOR WATER UTILITY PERMIT DESIGNATING PLACEMENT OF UTILITY IN COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY TO: THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS Pursuant to the Texas Utility Code, Section 181.024, comes now Wellborn SUD ' [company name], hereinafter referred to as "Company" a Texas [state] Corporation, with authority to transact business in Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized representative, and hereby petitions the County Engineer for the right to lay, construct, maintain, repair and/or operate a water line under and/or along certain County Roads as shown on drawings and diagrams attached hereto and said location described as follows: Facility to Cross Road Road Name & Block Number Length of Crossing TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (CHECK ONE) Bored lacked Driven Cased 12318 North Dowling 60' X X Facility to Parallel County Road Within Right -Of -Way Road Name and Block Number From To Depth Distance CONSTRUCTION TYPE 1" Diameter .10" Wall Thickness Material Specification PVC pipe 2" PVC Encasement Pipe Maximum Operation Pressure 200 psi The location and description of the proposed installation and appurtenances must be fully shown on the attached detailed drawings. The Company shall commence actual construction/work in good faith within 60 days from the date of said permit and shall complete said construction /work within 15 working days. (COMPANY MUST FILL IN). If such construction is not begun by the 6011' day, Company will be required to apply for a new permit. Company declares that prior to filing this application, it has ascertained the location of all existing utilities, both aerial and underground, and the filing of this application is prima facie evidence that the proposed installation will not conflict with any existing utility. A copy of this permit shall be kept at the job site any time work is being performed. It is expressly stipulated that this Permit is a license for permissive use only and that the placing of facilities upon public property pursuant to this permit shall not operate to create or vest any property right in said holder. It is understood and agreed that the rights and privileges herein set out are granted only to the extent of the County's right, title and interest in the land to be entered upon and used by the holder and the holder will at all times assume risk of and indemnify, defend and save harmless Brazos County from and against any and all loss, damages, cost or expense arising in any manner on account of the exercise or attempted exercise by said holder of the aforesaid rights and privileges. Any deviation from these specifications must be approved by Brazos County Engineer's Office or its designated representative. Approval of County Engineer's Office may take as long as two weeks after complete application is received. Applicant agrees to comply with all rules of the County Commissioners and the County Engineer in construction of said installation attached hereto as BRAZOS COUNTY DESIGN STANDARDS AND SAFETY PRECAUTION REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK CONDUCTED IN BRAZOS COUNTY RIGHTS OF WAY and incorporated herein for reference. In the event Company fails to obtain a permit prior to the installation or does not install utilities in compliance with installation requirements set forth herein (i.e. depth, location, etc), Company assumes all financial responsibility for damages and/or destruction of lines, cables, etc. based upon its failure to comply with Brazos County requirements. Applicant agrees that if Brazos County demonstrates a violation of the terms of this policy, Applicant stipulates that requisites for injunctive relief exist and that Brazos County is entitled to relief enjoining any conduct by applicant which is contrary to the policies. This permit is a revocable permit. Brazos County reserves the right to revoke this permit at any lime, in the sole discretion of Brazos County, for interests of public health, safety or welfare, or for failure to repair any dmnages upon demand, or for any other reason deemed sufficient by Brazos County. In the event Company falls to comply with any or all of the requirements as set forth herein, the County may lake such action as it deems appropriate to compel compliance. The County Engineer further retains the right to revoke this Permit by verbal notification to the Applicant/Company. Failure to obtain this permit and/or notify the County Engineer's Office within 24 hours of beginning construction shall constitute grounds for job shutdown. By signing below, I certify that I am authorized to represent the Company listed below, and that the Company agrees to the conditions/provisions included in this permit, Wellborn SUD Company Name Campbell Young B Signature Title Address City General Manager P.O. Box 250 Wellborn Tx 77881 State 979-690-9799 Zip Telephone Number julia@wellbornsud.com Email: WATER UTILITY APPROVAL Brazos County offers no objection to the proposed location of the utility in the County right of way as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated 'I✓LV Z 3, ZO Z'I except as noted below: (Month/Day/Year) EXCEPTIONS: nA1 N . Vb LJ V ROAD RIGHT -0F -WAIF Obg,E55 Z3 10 5a- IAA CENTER LINEOF COUNTY ROAD , ROAD RIGHT-OF-UrQ�� ��� Fn _ kse � 1 3o a / -1-o t a 3' $ r PLAN VIEW e v 1\\ D1 tvThck /114" friettrzzAA SHOW NORTH ARROW R O HT F-UURY CENTER LINE 3b" Ael zeY TYPICAL SECTION I COUNTY ROAD 1. IN CROSSING ROAD OR GOING ALONG RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHOW DEPTH & LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION IN TYPE SECTION & PLAN 2. IN PLAN VIEW SHOW DISTANCE FROM YOUR CONSTRUCTION TO NEAREST INTERSECTION 3. IF ABOVE PLAN VIEW AND/OR TYPE SECTION IS NOT APPLICABLE, THEN SHOW APPLICABLE PLAN AND/ OR SECTION GO0g$e Maps Imagery O2024 Airbus, Maxar Technologies, Map data ®2024 Google 50 $ Delays Light traffic in this area No known road disruptions. Traffic incidents will show up here. cu ssg 1)31 71(vni- 1\IEW�zcE �lf C-14 b I 4 56¢v L ZAIE BRAZOS COUNTY ROADWAY SAFETY AND ROAD PRESERVATION STANDARDS FOR WORK CONDUCTED IN BRAZOS COUNTY RIGHTS OF WAY A. General Requirements 1, Adequate drainage shall be maintained in ditches at all times. 2. Permittee will use best management practices ("BMP") (EPA and TCEQ both provide lists of examples of I3MPs) to minimize erosion and sedimentation resulting from the proposed installation. 3. The permittee shall take precautions to avoid damage to property. All County Right of Way and property shall be restored to its original condition, as far as practical, in the opinion of the County Engineer or appointed representative. 4. The construction and maintenance of such utility shall not interfere with the property or rights of a prior occupant. 5. Permittee shall not interfere with other utilities located in the right of way. In the event damages occur, permittee will be liable to the County or other utilities running through the right of way. 6. County Engineer shall determine whether or not permittee's plans shall inconvenience the public. If it is determined that inconvenience to the public exists, then the County Engineer will decide whether such project will be allowed or if an alternative exists so as not to inconvenience the public. B. Safely Requirements 1. Proper traffic control measures must be put in place prior to beginning work and remain in place during the duration of the job. All traffic control measures must follow the Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). See Traffic Control Requirements below. During construction, all safety regulations of the Texas Department of Transportation shall be observed. Permittee must take such precautions and measures, including placing and displaying safety devices, as may be necessary, in order to safely conduct the public through the project area. Company shall provide flagmen, signs, signals or devices necessary to provide complete safety to the public. 4. Adequate provisions must be made to cause minimum inconveniences to traffic and adjacent property owners. 5. No cable, conduit and/or pole line shall be laid, constructed, maintained and/or repaired so as to constitute a danger or hazard of any kind to persons or vehicles using such road. Any poles placed in the Right of Way for future installation shall be placed at the back of the Right of Way. Exceptions may be approved by the County Engineer. C. Traffic Control Plan A traffic control plan, pursuant to the TMUTCD or Engineered Traffic Control Plan must be provided for the following: a. Any construction (i.e. pit, excavation, hole) left open over night, requires specific nighttime traffic control measures pursuant to the TMUTCD; b. if construction is within ten (10) feet of the roadway; or c. Any work performed in the road right-of-way; 2. Plan must be attached to the permit and kept at the job site any time work is being performed. 3. Plan must set forth the time of completion for the job. D. Design Standards I. All overhead installations shall conform to clearance standards of the Texas Department of Transportation and the pole be placed in the designated area for power specified as set forth in the Texas Utilities Code, Section 181.045. 2. All pole installation (including lighting) shall be placed at the backside of the Right of Way to ensure safety to the public. Any pole placed in violation of this requirement will be required to be moved to the appropriate location at the company's expense. Exceptions may be approved by the County Engineer. 3. All underground installations shall (these are minimum depths— utility may place deeper): a. be placed at a minimum depth of forty-eight (48) inches below the top of the pavement; b. be at least thirty-six (36) inches below ditch flow line when installation is within the area measured from top of bank to top of bank; c. be at least forty-eight (48) inches below ditch flow line if low pressure gas or petroleum lines. For high pressure gas and petroleum lines, see High Pressure Pipelines requirements listed below; d. not be closer than ten (10) feet from the edge of pavement. Exceptions may apply in rights of way of less than 60'. 4. Water Lines: All water lines must be a minimum 36 -inches below the ditch flow line and cased. Waterlines shall be cased if crossing under the roadway. 5. Utilities in all, new developments that have 60 feet or greater of right of way shall be installed within designated locations based upon the type of utility. The locations shall be as follows: (measured from back of right-of-way). Power — 0-2 feet," nominally I' Phone -- 2-4 feet, nominally 3' Gas —4-6 feet, nominally 5' Cable -- 6-8 feet, nominally 7' 6. Utilities with less than 60 feet right-of-way in all new developments shall install the utility in a similar manner as referenced in No. 3 above, however, the County Engineer or its designated representative will provide final approval of each utility location. 7. The length of any trench to be opened in advance of the pipe, conduit or ducts may not be longer than 400' if left open over night or unattended. 8. Crossings under a county road shall: a. be bored or jacked. ABSOLUTELY NO OPEN CUTS WITHIN COUNTY ROAD PAVEMENT; b. be pressure grouted for the full length of the crossing ?f the annular space between pipe and casing and soil exceeds one (1) inch. Brazos County must be given 24 hours notice of pressure grouting operations and have the opportunity to have an inspector on site to observe pressure grouting operations; c. TxDOT Standard Specification Item 476 shall he followed for all boring, jacking, tunneling and joints. 9. Bore Pits a. no pits shall remain open longer than 2 days; b. all pits shall have proper traffic control measures in place. See Traffic Control Plan listed above, e. pits shall NOT be located within ten (10) feet from the edge of pavement without prior approval from the County Engineer or his representative; d. when pits are to remain open for more than 8 hours, dare diligence will be used in protecting the spoil piic to prevent drainage problems; e. based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require shoring to protect pavement integrity; f. based upon soil conditions, the County•Engineer or his representative may require pits be placed further from the edge of road. 10. Any installation within ten (10) feet of edge of pavement shall meet the following: a. location must be approved by the County Engineer or his representative b. backfilled with cement stabilized material. c. based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require shoring to protect pavement integrity. d. All excess water and mud shall be removed from the trench prior to backfilling. Any backlit] placed during a rainy period or at other times where excess water cannot be prevented from entering the trench will be considered TEMPORARY and shall be replaced with PERMANENT cement stabilized material as soon as weather permits; e. All disturbed base and pavement materials shall be removed and restored to the satisfaction of the County Engineer or his representatives. f. No side or lateral tamping to fill voids under the base and pavement materials is allowed. 11. Company must be careful to not jeopardize the slope or integrity of the shoulder of the road. In the event Company damages the slope, shoulder or any other portion of the right-of-way, Company will be responsible for repairing the damage and replacing the right-of-way to the condition it was prior to commencing construction. 12. Operation of construction and/or maintenance equipment on the traveled surface of any improved County road will not be permitted, except in an instance whereby the laying, construction, maintenance and/or repair of cables, conduits and/or pole lines cannot be accomplished by any other method and in this event all such equipment shall be of the rubber tire variety. Appropriate traffic control shall be provided meeting TMUTCD requirements. 13. In the event said construction and/or maintenance and/or repair requires Company to remove, cut or jeopardize any section of the road (asphalt, cement, road base, etc), Company will be required to provide a performance bond or letter of credit securing necessary repairs. Said bond amount will be determined by the County Engineer. 14. The applicant shall submit a letter of "No Objection" from the Army Corps of Engineers. for all designated wetlands and environmentally sensitive lands. E. Emergency work I. In the event Company is required to perform emergency services, that requires excavation in a County Right of Way, and unable to notify the County Engineer prior to conducting emergency repairs, Company shall notify County Engineer within 24 hours of beginning construction/repairs. This will allow the County Engineer and Road & Bridge Office an opportunity to inspect the site to ensure the integrity of the County Right of Way and traffic safety controls used. F Repairs to existing facilities 1. Maintenance and/or repair to existing cables, conduits, and/or pole lines which require disturbance of the soil, shall not be performed until plans describing such maintenance and/or repair have been approved by the County Engineer or designated representative and a permit has been obtained. G. Relocation of utilities: 1. When and if the County Engineer determines that it is necessary for the construction, repair, improvement, alteration or relocation of all or any portion of said road, any or all poles, wires, pipes, cables or other facilities and appurtenances authorized hereunder,, shall be removed from said road, or reset or relocated thereon, as required by the County Engineer within a reasonable time as determined by the County Engineer and Utility Company, and at the expense of the Utility Company. H. High Pressure Pipelines 1. All utility Permits for high pressure pipelines (generally 60 PSI or greater), whether pertaining to controlled access or non -controlled access installations, should contain the following additional information in the description of the permit. -diameter -wall thickness -material specification -minimum yield strength -maximum operation pressure of the pipeline 2. With the exception of the maximum operation pressure of the pipeline, this information is to be supplied for both the carrier pipe and the casing. 3. Assurance must also be given that the installation material and design meet the minimum Federal Safety Standards for Liquid and Gas Pipe Lines, Assurance must be provided on company letterhead and signed by an authorized representative of the company. 4. Petroleum Pipelines: Type of Pipeline Encased Pipe Encased Pipe Non -Cased Pipe Non -Cased Pipe Depth (below deepest ditch grade) Special Requirements Less than 10' Greater than 10' Less than 10' Greater than 10' Must be covered with concrete pad at least 36"deep No concrete pad required Must be covered with concrete pad at least 48"deep No concrete pad required The Concrete pad shall be minimum of 3" thick and width shall be pipe diameter plus 18" minimum. 5. Under no circumstances will a pipeline be installed parallel to a County Road within the Right -of - Way. Transmission lines have been determined to be petroleum pipelines (which includes natural gas lines) and shall not be parallel to a County Road, 6. Natural Gas Distribution is a line that serves the final customer. • to-• fa iwn Or lea• a..set farm •Irl5N set le gooses It gas cart grog Ts a fllalwa 5, ffi• tram me morsel tr5nlel .ses. 11os rotas . 5 31 a a { TCP (2-1oi 44 P 5a' iv kW' LwImp II WORK SPACE NEAR SHOULDER Conventional Roods Ciao twrws 4 5 II DIDEM 4S' Il . Os art std. 014 5 5 Of 4 c70•2 m• I 11. the twos bat I TCP (2-ibi 152 csao.lw aloes - Pte' Seen 11 WORK SPACE ON SHOULDER Conventional Roads qa 1;r trims - 7s. Kos 1 t k. kis 1 541 *Wel* sr eft*. Ppl@m04 KM OS Ince& masts own% Melt mean In 5415 i.Wsis% Pres Issas et Instills 17 Isasre11s1•0 sg.lsss lisle Mar. TCP I2-ic) am-te IV II a1 Vera• it. roes ll WORK VEHICLES ON SHOULDER Conventional Roods LEGEND 1 tar 3 lorries* ■ • relw.ellslta flora... r,{I . %rk %wows CMINA, tve115r enhtoa 11aNlss 54*' Mart ' Pala)). assess. WOOS MI wa4t .4. *In Wm PH. a vita w 'Wit al IILLI saloml. a11w Ionise 865 14 w u:.. -s• Kis= , Kist Laji m.• lalwsw KEN EIS Ile MI GIN CZ:itip!MI Mil Ca notml Lin Fir212311IIZIM11Iil rz,3anlzEGA ir.Mi IEEE IlaZiUil luDEKmEI.7Ma= MLA KM El[ KM, EMI Erin lik `imI tIt =Ea K.! 0 Ea Nam r 7 E1M mmo Ma. E t:72 MI Eli ELI Iriii LIZ nanolir"3i 0 WM um e Comiwllwol l 0115 MI Sow Wars Sawa urn rtonass .rt. Stroll N 515 451/ Walla er Weael01l 1•Wovst lssamnerss TYPIcu, I®gt OW ••21 11 1 ir11N I mama aniamait 1W nata 51 Inc SOU mamma O f 1 A GERM & *VIES L 15* astses5 to *re wee W % ors 1. SP trf111. 5464 *dab 11115.lwa ws Il i Wain law aestw sirs Ism 1rlgrsle some sey 110 oasts' wee meal Is Ito PPPs, ar tar mead acIlltelOCO WS. ohs, W%.* iT Su frogs%. 3. It sislf5 seawlll ISM, N x15 5 sast♦a st .* agog Rrw isms.* *5151 me. S. Dae s 45:51. Ills IN WI SIII keaef47 to1.P6er, leatste. *4111511aa.- OM* lisSIa.sloges 4 Is4P oit71 a 1t0 sods as wed areas* It m M EsstIra.5 Nos in Mgt !R O M. et rot was N wr J5.4414I'.►ew5IT ~Ins we semi .r sun rr71 .t ns wt. t1 areas ors re leer .roan* Ir1 (5* r Net 1 11451 mates Its sH115 s sCrst Is ,Ts mats In ..se. has IwrLmes r sear srsre•Ildris solar w r 5PNtMrs Pr IoW *Wm 5wt151s elm Aa. & .alla.el lea %Wars .IN !femurs le Putters set trw I W'a arias. '..t Is fan *en N wow In I•gsnw 5 .lsr ems CICCIL I. Tor 1013.41 Pr ew34 st we *Mad Memo% ingsvme, a* t. MOW writ velum Ir t+vrar Ndllwsar orem N amass sot •em rrin.l+.e 1w mew sanest 1 woo raw ~Si: 6 O314 BC33. slew aria 1a 53W M stew al *41.15 'AAa UK saf%S' glen Ir ledge arks+ wMMITISsel terrs4. rrr ess3.anc1lan r w5Inte'ee5 ssnemst 155. sassy erg =vim, rot heel la fir tft59as awls Ism aat ee fan, Is ?ft tael®t aX2313. 1@iM I®1• Iyype. SOL 5Srrfswts.. Slum am wade nivsli,. 24.70aatlagyfamialTraraparaillia hwmrrwra. a1ks. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN CONVENTIONAL ROAD SHOULDER WORK IRO. Sumo tee 'S air 4-E •AI TCP(2-il-f2 salt.. TO: FROM: DATE: FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGETED: DOLLAR AMOUNT: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Permit -Wellborn -1299 Pleasant Hill.pdf BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Road and Bridge NUMBER: CC-2024-Wellbom SUD-1299 Pleasant Hill DATE OF COURT MEETING: 7/30/2024 ITEM: Consider and take action on the Wellborn SUD utility permit to construct a road bore at 1299 Pleasant Hill Road to provide water services. Site is local ed in Precinct 4. Commissioners Court Joe Salvato 07/25/2024 False False $0.00 Description Utility Permit - Wellborn SUD - Pleasant Hill Road Tvne Backup Material Duane Peters County Judge 3OIa4- Date APPLICATION FOR WATER UTILITY PERMIT DESIGNATING PLACEMENT OF UTILITY IN COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY TO: THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS Pursuant to the Texas Utility Code, Section 181.024, comes now Wellborn SUD [company name], hereinafter referred to as "Company" a Texas [slate] Corporation, with authority to transact business in Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized representative, and hereby petitions the County Engineer for the right to lay, construct, maintain, repair and/or operate a water line under and/or along certain County Roads as shown on drawings and diagrams attached hereto and said location described as follows: Facility to Cross Road Road Name & Block Number Length of Crossing TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (CHECK ONE) Bored Jacked Driven Cased 1299 Pleasant Hill 80' X X Facility to Parallel County Road Within Rieht-Of-Way Road Name and Block Number From To Depth Distance CONSTRUCTION TYPE 1" Diameter .10" Wall Thickness Material Specification PVC pipe 2" PVC Encasement Pipe Maximum Operation Pressure 200 psi The location and description of the proposed installation and appurtenances must be fully shown on the attached detailed drawings. The Company shall commence actual construction/work in good faith within 60 days from the date of said permit and shall complete said construction /work within 15 working days. (COMPANY MUST FILL IN). If such construction is not begun by the 60'h day, Company will be required to apply for a new permit. Company declares that prior to filing this application, it has ascertained the location of all existing utilities, both aerial and underground, and the filing of this application is prima facie evidence that the proposed installation will not conflict with any existing utility. A copy of this permit shall be kept at the job site any time work is being performed. It is expressly stipulated that this Permit is a license for permissive use only and that the placing of facilities upon public property pursuant to this permit shall not operate to create or vest any property right in said holder. It is understood and agreed that the rights and privileges herein set out are granted only to the extent of the County's right, title and interest in the land to be entered upon and used by the holder and the holder will at all times assume risk of and indemnify, defend and save harmless Brazos County from and against any and all loss, damages, cost or expense arising in any manner on account of the exercise or attempted exercise by said holder of the aforesaid rights. and privileges. Any deviation from these specifications must be approved by Brazos County Engineer's Office or its designated representative. Approval of County Engineer's Office may take as long as two weeks after complete application is received. Applicant agrees to comply with all rules of the County Commissioners and the County Engineer in construction of said installation attached hereto as BRAZOS COUNTY DESIGN STANDARDS AND SAFETY PRECAUTION REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK CONDUCTED IN BRAZOS COUNTY RIGHTS OF WAY and incorporated herein for reference. In the event Company fails to obtain a permit prior to the installation or does not install utilities in compliance with installation requirements set forth herein (i.e. depth, location, etc), Company assumes all financial responsibility for damages and/or destruction of lines, cables, etc. based upon its failure to comply with Brazos County requirements. Applicant agrees that If Brows County demonstrates a violation of the terms of this policy, Applicant stipulates that requisites for injunctive relief exist and that Brazos County is entitled to relief enjoining any conduct by applicant which is contrary to the policies. This permit is a revocable permit. Brazos County reserves Me right to revoke this permit at any time, in the sole discretion of Brazos County, for interests of public health, safety or welfare, or for failure to repair any damages upon demand, or for any other reason deemed sufficient by Brazos County. In the event Company fails to comply with any or all of the requirements as set forth herein, the County may take such action as it deems appropriate to compel compliance. The County Engineer further retains the right to revoke this Permit by verbal notification to the Applicant/Company. Failure to obtain this permit and/or notify the County Engineer's Office within 24 hours of beginning constructions shall constitute grounds for job shutdown. By signing below, I certify that I am authorized to represent the Company listed below, and that the Company agrees to the conditions/provisions included in this permit. Wellborn SUD Company Name Campbell Young Signature Title Address General Manager P.O. Box 250 Wellborn Tx 77881 City State 979-690-9799 Zip Telephone Number julia@wellbornsud.com Email: WATER UTILITY APPROVAL Brazos County offers no objection to the proposed location of the luttility in the County right of way as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated ..$ 2 ` except as noted below: (Month/Day/Year) EXCEPTIONS: No BraCounty Engineer ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AbDtreCS i Zci5 P1 e.Ano.A-t kh t 1( 661-4", I� 4's/to' CENTER LINEOF COUNTY ROAD ROAD G HT -0 F-UUAY tom,ek'Cl, 1rQv' A4e -S & R aK1 4 V � I -a t)1 o ' tett%) tier -� bo" e locicm la PLAN VIEW 1 (0 SNOW NORTH ARROW W i R1G11T F-4VA C ENTER LINE N . 36' Ali -N TYPICAL SECTION ate 1 \l COUNTY ROAD 1. IN CROSSING ROAD OR GOING ALONG RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHOW DEPTH & LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION IN TYPE SECTION & PLAN 2. IN PLAN VIEW SHOW DISTANCE FROM YOUR CONSTRUCTION TO NEAREST INTERSECTION 3. IF ABOVE PLAN VIEW ANDOOR TYPE SECTION IS NOT APPLICABLE, THEN SHOW APPLICABLE PLAN AND/ OR SECTION L ROAD �z. } J " I tl , akacli. 'Qr. Nor+h .:. CONCR ENCASED CROSS I N ' FRQ . MEtER': HC : 365' •TO AMETi ER - 110•nammummmmmtmil■a • 480 P.V.C.,•PIPE FROM CONNeCTION TO 3" PIPE TO METER NO. 365 I I :1 - 11 �, 1�, d f i tl x^, Y I i K 1 Y i i 1 �• � d. i. l r'_ u'. .� 1 A gg5 ! �r Ali Atl' 1 050.. F,,,3' P.V.C. FkO' CONNECTION TO 6H PIPE TO BATCH •' " u SHEET NQ- . 4 Riga.. , . gig g5 9 _ 2 • it ACS -3 1 RV Oz' (20 Goggle Maps Imagery 4:2024 Maxar Technologies, Map data O2024 100 ft Delays Light traffic in this area No known road disruptions. Traffic incidents will show up here. Amg,G5s 1 'i Pi& -5i -r /�L BRAZOS COUNTY ROADWAY SAFETY AND ROAD PRESERVATION STANDARDS FOR WORK CONDUCTED IN BRAZOS COUNTY RIGHTS OF WAY A. General Requirements 1. Adequate drainage shall be maintained in ditches at all times. 2. Permittee will use best management practices ("BMP") (EPA and TCEQ both provide lists of examples of BMPs) to minimize erosion and sedimentation resulting from the proposed installation. 3. The permittee shall take precautions to avoid damage to property. All County Right of Way and property shall be restored to its original condition, as far as practical, in the opinion of the County Engineer or appointed representative. 4. The construction and maintenance of such utility shall not interfere with the property or rights of a prior occupant. 5. Permittee shall not interfere with other utilities located in the right of way. In the event damages occur, permittee will be liable to the County or other utilities running through the right of way. 6. County Engineer shall determine whether or not permittee's plans shall inconvenience the public. If it is determined that inconvenience to the public exists, then the County Engineer will decide whether such project will be allowed or if an alternative exists so as not to inconvenience the public. B. Safety Requirements 1. Proper traffic control measures must be put in place prior to beginning work and remain in place during the duration of the job. All traffic control measures must follow the Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). See Traffic Control Requirements below. 2. During construction, all safety regulations of the Texas Department of Transportation shall be observed. 3. Permittee must take such precautions and measures, including placing and displaying safety devices, as, may be necessary, in order to safely conduct the public through the project area. Company shall provide flagmen, signs, signals. or devices necessary to provide complete safety to the public. 4. Adequate provisions must be made to cause minimum inconveniences to traffic and adjacent property owners. 5. No cable, conduit and/or pole line shall be laid, constructed, maintained and/or repaired so as to constitute a danger or hazard of any kind to persons or vehicles using such road. Any poles placed in the Right of Way for future installation shall be placed at the back of the Right of Way. Exceptions may be approved by the County Engineer. C f. Traffic Control Plan A traffic control plan, pursuant to the 'l'MUTCD or Engineered Traffic Control Plan must be provided for the following: a. Any construction (i.e. pit, excavation, hole) left open over night, requires specific nighttimetraffic control measures pursuant to the TMUTCD; b, 1f construction is within ten (10) feet of the roadway; or c. Any work performed in the road right-of-way; 2. Plan must be attached to the permit and kept at the job site any time work is being performed, 3. Plan must set forth the time of completion for the job. D. Design Standards 1. Ali overhead installations shall conform to clearance standards of the Texas Department ofTransportation and the pole be placed in the designated area for power specified as set forth in the Texas Utilities Code, Section 181.045. 2. All pole installation (including lighting) shall be placed at the backside of the Right of Way to ensure safety to the public. Any pole placed in violation of this requirement will be required to be moved to the appropriate location at the company's expense. Exceptions may be approved by the County Engineer. 3, All underground installations shall (these are minimum depths— utility may place deeper): a. be placed at a minimum depth of forty-eight (48) inches below the top of the pavement; b. be at least thirty-six (36) inches below ditch flow line when installation is within the area measured from top of bank to top of bank; c. be at least forty-eight (48) inches below ditch flow line if low pressure gas or petroleum lines. For high pressure gas and petroleum lines, see High Pressure Pipelines requirements listed below; d. not be closer than ten (10) feet from the edge of pavement. Exceptions may apply in rights of way of less than 60'. 4. Water Lines: All water lines must be a minimum 36 -inches below the ditch flow line and cased. Waterlines shall be cased if crossing under the roadway. 5. Utilities in all new developments that have 60 feet or greater of right of way shall be installed within designated locations based upon the type of utility. The locations shall be as follows: (measured from back of right-of-way). Power — 0-2 feet, nominally 1' Phone — 2-4 feet, nominally 3' Gas — 4-6 feet, nominally 5' Cable — 6-8 feet, nominally 7' 6. Utilities with less than 60 feet right-of-way in all new developments shall install the utility in a similar manner as referenced in No. 3 above, however, the County Engineer or its designated representative will provide final approval of each utility location. 7. The length of any trench to be opened in advance of the pipe, conduit or ducts may not be longer than 400' if left open over night or unattended. 8. Crossings under a county road shall: a. be bored or jacked. ABSOLUTELY NO OPEN CUTS WITHIN COUNTY ROAD PAVEMENT; b. be pressure grouted for the full length of the crossing lithe annular space between pipe and casing and soil exceeds one (1) inch. Brazos County must be given 24 hours notice of pressure grouting operations and have the opportunity to have an inspector on site to observe pressure grouting operations; e. TxDOT Standard Specification Item 476 shall be followed for all boring, jacking, tunneling and joints. 9. Bore Pits a. no pits shall remain open longer than 2 days; b. all pits shall have proper traffic control measures in place. See Traffic Control Plan listed above. c. pits shall NOT be located within ten ( 10) feet from the edge of pavement without prior approval from the County Engineer or his representative; d. when pits are to remain open for more than $ hours, due diligence will be used in protecting the spoil pile to prevent drainage problem's; e. based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require shoring to protect pavement integrity; f, based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require pits be placed further from the edge of road. 10. Any installation within ten (10) feet of edge of pavement shall meet the following: a. location must be approved by the County Engineer or his representative b. backfilled with cement stabilized material. c. based upon soil conditions,. the County Engineer or his representative may require shoring to protect pavement integrity. d. All excess water and mud shall be removed from the trench prior to backfilling. Any backfill placed during a rainy period or at other times where excess water cannot be prevented from entering the trench will be considered TEMPORARY and shall be replaced with PERMANENT cement stabilized material as soon as weather permits; e. All disturbed base and pavement materials shall be removed and restored to the satisfaction of the County Engineer or his representatives. t. No side or lateral tamping to fill voids under the base and pavement materials is allowed. 11. Company must be careful to not jeopardize the slope or integrity of the shoulder of the road. In the event Company damages the slope, shoulder or any other portion of the right-of-way, Company will be responsible for repairing the damage and replacing the right-of-way to the condition it was prior to commencing construction. 12. Operation of construction and/or maintenance equipment on the traveled surface of any improved County road will not be permitted, except in an instance whereby the laying, construction, maintenance and/or repair ofcables, conduits and/or pole lines cannot be accomplished by any other method and in this event all such equipment shall be of the rubber tire variety. Appropriate traffic control shall be provided meeting TMUTCD requirements. l3. In the event said construction and/or maintenance and/or repair requires Company to remove, cut or jeopardize any section of the road (asphalt, cement, road base, etc), Company will be required to provide a performance bond or letter of credit securing necessary repairs. Said bond amount will be determined by the County Engineer. 14. The applicant shall submit a letter of"No Objection" from the Army Corps of Engineers for all designated wetlands and environmentally sensitive lands. E. Emergency work 1, In the event Company is required to perform emergency services, that requires excavation in a County Right of Way, and unable to notify the County Engineer prior to conducting emergency repairs, Company shall notify County Engineer within 24 hours of beginning construction/repairs. This will allow the County Engineer and Road & Bridge Office an opportunity to inspect the site to ensure the integrity oldie County Right of Way and traffic safety controls used. 1 F. . Repairs to existing facilities I . Maintenance and/or repair to existing cables, conduits, and/or pole lines which require disturbance of the soil, shall not be performed until plans describing such maintenance and/or repair have been approved by the County Engineer or designated representative and a permit has been obtained. G. Relocation of utilities: 1. When and if the County Engineer determines that it is necessary for the construction, repair, improvement, alteration or relocation of all or any portion of said road, any or all poles, wires, pipes, cables or other facilities and appurtenances authorized hereunder, shall be removed from said road, or reset or relocated thereon, as required by the County Engineer within a reasonable time as determined by the County Engineer and Utility Company, and at the expense of the Utility Company. H. High Pressure Pipelines 1. All utility Permits for high pressure pipelines (generally 60 PSI or greater), whether pertaining to controlled access or non -controlled access installations, should contain the following additional information in the description of the permit, -diameter -wall thickness -material specification -minimum yield strength -maximum operation pressure of the pipeline 2. With the exception of the maximum operation pressure of the pipeline, this information is to be supplied for both the carrier pipe and the casing. 3. Assurance must also be given that the installation material and design meet the minimum Federal Safety Standards for Liquid and Gas Pipe Lines. Assurance must be provided on company letterhead and signed by an authorized representative of the company. 4. Petroleum Pipelines: Type of Pipeline Encased Pipe Encased Pipe Non -Cased Pipe Non -Cased Pipe Depth (below deepest ditch grade) Special Requirements Less than 10' Greater than 10' Less than 10' Greater than 10' Must be covered with concrete pad at least 36"deep No concrete pad required Must be covered with concrete pad at least 48"deep No concrete pad required The Concrete pad shall be minimum of 3" thick and width shall be pipe diameter plus 18" minimum. 5. Under no circumstances will a pipeline be installed parallel to a County Road within the Right -of - Way. Transmission lines 'have been determined to be petroleum pipelines (which includes natural gas lines) and shall not be parallel to a County Road. 6, Natural Gas Distribution is a line that serves the final customer. TCP (2-1a) WORK SPACE NEAR SHOULDER Conventional Roods TCP (2-1D) WORK SPACE ON SHOULDER Conventional Roads . .a oaatslae I sr 'Oar sisoltiosn ate'"° yrs krs es trisSa. meek info;• Sell rmoiri 141 ✓ ota f1441 IfPrae low 4t instils to Shirrs! I Mesa ordses e l nil teem toes tons 4 IS .4fl• 1144 eel• bJ1 '0'14 TCP I2 -1c) ee J iii-! 4e° a 24• tine roll 11411 tt 1p. 144 ra$. II WORK VEHICLES ON SHOULDER Convent i ona I Hoods • !' Jl gl ) LEGEND sazoo two 1 Doi -fowls • • Tt �l lsto31 s.i.ros [� 41 ivory %A ls% ' id's i ° ,' IRa1 treater >bexe• fleirtio3 asset* /w4esto orYnwle maw Eat* mu .. 1$g1 Irr4tla Flow Q 11s � newer ..� isi IIA lerr. also rwr'.r Iugr'ea s harry a.ee u'w• *Ii !.!iiMIEIEMI EdIEUI IQ inif MEM ILEA ©. ILEX ;. ®Iris. I �)il Enill MEW MM IIIMill 1,� al r NUR NCR EMI" ICCIIIINIZZAINEMIIII �:',.u=iii lit! TIMM Rr^il INCA WIN C511iliIMI 117.11111 lei t: IM "Mira= -FM Mil ICIII IESII lmot wall LIM 0 en mum 113 Mil EI ER IriiiA ECM Q En liZa Ca moms 1611 IT1M-:si G.1411aa11 Ilareea 0113, S. tar borer Mr tree rawer at. ttalt•J1 sr Iiser'tlal woken M Mles11Trl t. 4 144 terediI4U4 TWICM, USAGE 4,g.t km:?SW 1th FORM nutorarr enema me Ia/TlIl4r me. UM MIMS? ✓ d l G5Nm. MOTES t rl41. ®riot m a1119e area arum ors 1.. 711 ?semi 71714791•891= 111011n34157 4i 1163.13G. MEN Ow carried .Iln •s 111i•r .tau q Ire *err vie Orel la Tr sea& Or le 1441111 wrier toe err.. rail =MelIg lee Wren I. rle�rllal merle stair r 4414 a Wine .v >a e..t 11r faa•at owns/ top. e. Was Weis .t411a se .lee l+®rt11 Metier. Ile41le . soltiOt1.4,71.11,1119i FRQ1a. I iaarr find/ .14141 Mesta to sus milks 11 e4. M walrresd IS is ter MM In Weyer .. fti r+1e w 1144 IIIIISMAP .I1=1 1Ytr1lr smith% nm rorls»l31 or aol11y ea GIs s3S el /stirs ere ra tops mos Al tea it art Orlas now err tnlM . etsAnt le rash 44 arm. lies .A &wiener er War rowellder whir err 4.411444444w /s. Morro rallau al4 t4L 1. 1141114.1 lWerf44 441 veal r4►tor r palletise .111b mil etre� I..t 1• tole elm h mm is "MOW .*IOC sere ,mom IL as relrolI fir swe44 wt moms. N1r.w e.a.►a.q.woomM sel T. hrcths ac Fr tl4aee w War 41/1744. /iris we war low va reterr/.4e Mar 44I I Imo Ilea 44 feral yarn. 4. 11414 IMAM star eles •4 r ease r 4te14 a awn mar** mar 444,4 to ~ear errr w aaAle4! Ioe err. Sr.. erf4rteel4l or asilitosoto eayroal sar% stseIfIc .sprouts far seams viols lee osi Os rani in its OrIP3s4 GPM. Siiik3 wd sio wore*arm Taw Ihrpsrlusici Tierevriallas 15yra4sl4r4 Paso TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN CONVENTIONAL ROAD SHOULDER WORK @Isar ..r, 141 enkai. 4'71 P41 .4 147 141 TtP(2-11-12 ..err JC.14.J..we Io-ti. BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Road and Bridge NUMBER: DATE OF COURT MEETING: ITEM: TO: FROM: DATE: FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGETED: DOLLAR AMOUNT: NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description 2024-07- Application Development for Develo ment 09 FP APP Southern_Pointe 400_Replat .pdf Southern_Pointe400-Layouti.pdf Plat 7/30/2024 CC2024 Southern Pointe Section 400 Replat BIk 79 Common Area I 400 Request approval of the Final Plat of Southern Pointe ;Subdivision Section 400, Block 79, Lots 37 through 43, 0.921 Acre Being a Replat of Block 79, Common Area I, 400 Southern Pointe Subdivision Section 400; Sterrett D. Smith League Survey, A-210; City of College Station ETJ, Brazos County, Texas. Site is located in Precinct 1. Commissioners Court Karen Tyler 07/25/2024 False False $0.00 Southern Pointe Section 400, recorded in Volume 18633, Page 130 OPRBCT Backup Material Backup Material APPRO Duane Petei s County Judge 3a(aq-- Date Brazos County Road & Bridge Office 2617 SH 21 West Bryan, TX 77803 Telephone: (979) 822-2127 Fax: (979 775-0456 Email: plats(&,,brazoscountytx.gov PLAT APPLICATION SUBJECT PROPERTY INFORMATION APPLICATION DATE *:7-9-2024 I RESUBMITTAL: ( IYES uNO PROJECT / SUBDIVISION NAME: Southern Pointe Subdivision Section 400 Replat PROJECT ADDRESS OR LOCATION: CANTON DR TX LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CANTON DR TX - SOUTHERN POINTE SEC 400, BLOCK 79, LOT COMMON AREAS A - I, ACRES 3.693 IF RESUBMITTAL, PROJECT FORMERLY KNOWN AS: N/A NUMBER OF LOTS: 7 TOTAL ACREAGE 0.921 JURISDICTION :1 I CITY LIMITS ✓ College Station ETJ I I OUTSIDE ALL CITY LIMITS AND ETJs * Notification of Application completeness will be given within 10 days of Application date. All incomplete Applications will be rejected. This Application shall expire five (5) years from the Application date of the project. TYPE OF APPLICATION MASTER PLAN ■ SIMPLIFIED PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAN FINAL PLAT AMENDING PLAT ✓ REPLAT APPLICATION PURPOSE RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME RENTAL COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ❑ nOTHER (Please explain): FLOODPLAIN IS ANY OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN A FLOODPLAIN OR FLOOD HAZARD AREA? YES NO Acknowledgment: The flood hazard boundary maps and other flood data used by Brazos County in evaluating flood hazards to proposed Developments are considered reasonable and accurate for regulatory purposes and are based on the best available scientific and engineering data On rare occasions greater floods can and will occur and flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. Issuance of a Floodplain Permit in accordance with the Brazos County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance does not imply that Development outside the areas of special flood hazard will be free from flooding or flood damage. Issuance of a permit shall not create liability on the part of Brazos County or any officer or employee of Brazos County in the event flooding or flood damage does occur. - TxDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL ANY CONSTRUCTION OCCUR IN TxDOT RIGHT-OF-WAYS? ■ YES ✓ NO COUNTY ENGINEER ADOBE (.pdf file) AutoCAD (.dwg file) (Email To: plats@brazoscountytx.gov) 911 ADDRESSING nADOBE (.pdf file) nAutoCAD (.dwg file) (Email To: gis@brazoscountvtx.gov) CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT INFORMATION FIRM NAME: Schultz Engineering, LLC CONTACT: Ricky Flores, P.E. ADDRESS: 911 Southwest Parkway East CITY: College Station STATE: TX ZIP: 77840 PHONE: 979-764-3900 FAX: 979-764-3910 EMAIL: ricky@schultzeng.com PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION FIRM NAME: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. CONTACT: Wallace Phillips ADDRESS: 1140 Midtown Drive CITY: College Station STATE: TX ZIP: 77845 PHONE: 979-255-4466 FAX: EMAIL: wsphillips3@gmail.com ENGINEER INFORMATION FIRM NAME: Schultz Engineering, LLC CONTACT: Ricky Flores, P.E. ADDRESS: 911 Southwest Parkway East CITY: College Station STATE: TX ZIP: 77840 PHONE: 979-764-3900 FAX: 979-764-3910 EMAIL: ricky@schultzeng.com SURVEYOR INFORMATION. FIRM NAME: Kerr Surveying, LLC CONTACT: Nathan Paul Kerr ADDRESS: 409 N Texas Ave CITY: Bryan STATE: TX ZIP: 77803 PHONE: 979-268-3195 FAX: EMAIL: nathan@kerrsurveying.net OTHER INFORMATION FIRM NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER CONSENT / AGENT AUTHORIZATION By my signature, I hereby affirm that I am the property Owner of record, or if the Applicant is an organization or business entity, that authorization has been granted to represent the Owner, organization or business in this Application. I certify that the preceding information is complete and accurate, and it iz n 1erstood that I agree to the Development/Subdivision of this property. SIGNATU 44,/doefRA� __777___' RINTED NAME: Wallace Phillips DATE: 7/9/2024 B425E4A2BBCD449... SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: DATE: By signing this form, the Owner of the property authorizes Brazos County to begin proceedings in accordance with the process for this type of Application indicated on page one of this Application. The Owner further acknowledges that submission of an Application does not in any way obligate the County to approve the Application and that although County staff may make certain recommendations regarding this Application, the Commissioner's Court may not follow that recommendation and may make a final decision that does not conform to the staffs recommendation. CALCULATIONS OF FEES MASTER PLAN: No charge SIMPLIFIED PLAT: $100 PRELIMINARY PLAN: $150 + $5 per lot FINAL PLAT: $150 + $10 per lot AMENDING PLAT: $100 REPLAT: $150 RECEIPT BY BRAZOS COUNTY (Official Use Only) DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED / REJECTED: / / DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: / / SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: Receipt of this Application by Brazos County does not provide confirmation or acceptance of a complete Application, nor does it waive requirements for any additional information not contained as part of this Application which may also be needed as a part of the review process. Application Check List: Copies of finished plat with corrections (if any): ✓ Three (3) hard copies to Brazos County One (1) .pdf copy to Brazos County One (1) .dwg copy to Brazos County One (1) hard copy to Brazos County Health District One (1) hard copy to Brazos County 911 One (1) hard copy to local Water District or Company Letters of approval (to be sent by the approving institution directly to Brazos County Engineering): MLetter from Brazos County Health District - For On -site sewage evaluation. Letter from Brazos County 911 - For Road names. nLetter from Water District or Company. - Stating water availability, etc. If property is within an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of a City: Approval notification from appropriate City. Applicant attests that they have signed this Application in the capacity designated, if any, and further attests that they have read document and the statement contained herein and any attached are true and factual. All Applicants are encouraged to review the County Regulations prior to any plat submittal. It is understood that this Application is not finished or dated until all documents listed above are filed at the Brazos County Engineering Office and all applicable blanks are filled in the Application above. SIMPLIFIED FINAL PLAT REQUIREMENTS Every Simplified Plat shall include all of the following: nTitle Block with the following information: nName, address, telephone and email address of Subdivider, recorded Owner, Engineer and surveyor. nProposed name of Subdivision. (Subdivision name & Street names will be approved through the Brazos County 911.) (Replats need to retain original Subdivision name.) Date of preparation. (Include the date of any revisions on the plat.) Engineer's scale in feet. Total area intended to be developed. Proposed number of Lots to be developed. Re -plat or Amending Plat, existing Lot and Block description or Abstract name and number. North arrow. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100 -feet per inch or larger. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. Boundary must include all of Parent Tract. All horizontal control and vertical elevations depicted on the plat shall be tied to NAD83 and NAVD 1988 Datum. lIA vicinity map, drawn at a scale appropriate to show all nearby major Roadways and sufficient in detail to identify the location of the proposed plat. nAll adjacent property Owner's names, deed record, or Subdivision name, Block and Lot number, and existing use. nAll parcels within the boundary of the Subdivision shall have a Block and Lot number shown on the face of the plat drawing. nCounty boundaries, City, limits, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) boundaries, school district boundaries and Subdivision section and/or phase boundaries. riRoad names and Right -of -Way width for all Roads. (Existing and proposed) [] All existing and proposed plat boundary lines, phase/section lines, and Lot lines with bearings and dimensions. T7Utility Services. (Water, wastewater, electrical, natural gas, cable, phone, etc.) Pipelines: label company with volume and page. All certification language as found in Appendix C. Easements and rights -of -way shall be dedicated to the public. The dedication of all Easements and rights -of -way shall be accomplished free of liens. The dedication shall be accompanied by the Certificate of Ownership and Dedication language found in Appendix C. The Owner's and any lien holder's dedication, and restrictions if any duly acknowledged in the manner required for acknowledgement of deeds, shall also be provided. nAll proposed Easements and existing Easements of record that have a designated route shall be shown on the plat with bearings and dimensions. The Owner shall be responsible for coordinating with all Utility Providers the location of all utility Easements that are shown on the Final Plat. nBuilding Setback Lines for each proposed Lot as defined herein. For Subdivisions located within an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), this may be shown on the drawing or included as a plat note. n Metes and bounds description of the property to be subdivided shall be certified by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS), describing a beginning point and reciting bearings and distances to a corner of the original land grant survey of which the Subdivision is a part, according to the best available data. (Shown on drawing; not separate description) [] All Subdivision external corners, angle points, points of curvature and points of tangency shall be set by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS) before the plat is recorded and shall be a TxDOT "Light Duty Setting" monument with an aluminum or bronze disk as specified in Appendix C of the TxDOT Survey Manual of April 2011. Alternately, Bernsten® Standard Aluminum Base monument (or equivalent as approved by the County Engineer) embedded and backfilled with compacted sand may be used. All Daughter Lots, Blocks and rights -of -way within the Subdivision shall be fully monumented in compliance with the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveying Act and the Board Rules set by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS) before the plat is recorded. [] Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which, later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, Block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the surveyor tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. All boundaries shall be tied to a County control monument. [] The plat note regarding Owner's responsibilities as found in Appendix G.4, if not contained in the Owner's dedication. [] The On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) setback as required by the Brazos County Health District. [] The location, zone classification and panel Effective Date of the 100 -Year Floodplain as identified on the most current Brazos County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). n If there are any areas within the plat that include a FEMA-mapped Floodplain with a Zone A classification, or if there exists within or adjacent to the plat any water courses whose upstream drainage basin is larger than 64 acres, the plat shall also show the extent of the 100 -Year Floodplain as determined by an engineering study under the seal of a Registered Professional Engineer. This study shall be sufficient in scope to determine and establish a BFE for all points within the plat. [] BFE's shall be shown for all points within the plat, as determined by the results of an engineering study. For plats where a FEMA-mapped Floodplain with a Zone AE classification exists within the plat, the BFE established by the accompanying FEMA- published flood study may be substituted for the engineering study. [] A minimum lowest finished floor elevation (FFE) for Buildings shall be established for each Lot within the plat. This minimum FFE shall be twelve (12) inches higher than the highest spot elevation that is located within five (5) feet outside the perimeter of the Building, or two -feet above the BFE, whichever is higher. [] If any areas within the plat include a 100 -Year Floodplain (as determined by the results of an engineering study or as established by FEMA), a benchmark shall be established by the Owner within or immediately adjacent to the boundary of the plat. The location, description and elevation of the benchmark are required to be identified on the face of the plat. The elevation of this benchmark shall utilize the same vertical datum as that used in the engineering study to determine the FFE. nA separate drawing containing both existing and proposed topographic information at 2 -FT contour intervals along with the plat boundaries, Easement locations (existing & proposed), and culverts (existing & proposed). nThe certification language as found in Appendix C for both the Commissioner's Court approval and the County Clerk's filing certificate shall be located on the face of the plat. These signatures shall be obtained after approval by the Brazos County Commissioner's Court. [] If any Lot within the plat will be served by a well or an On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF), a letter must be provided by the Brazos County Health District stating they have examined the plat and that it is in compliance with the Brazos County On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) Regulations, Construction Standards for On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) Regulations as published by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). This letter must be signed by a representative of the District prior to Final Plat approval. nIf the plat contains a water well site, there shall be a depiction of the TCEQ separation requirements per Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 290, Subchapter D Rule §290.41. nIf rural route mailboxes are proposed, the plat note as found in Appendix G.2 for placement of such mailboxes shall be shown on the face of the plat. I _ I If any areas of the plat are located outside of all incorporated areas, the plat note as found in Appendix G.1 regarding the requirement to obtain a unique Development Permit from the Brazos County Floodplain Administrator prior to locating or altering a structure or land shall be placed on the plat. I _ I It is the responsibility of the Owner to assure that the proposed name of the Subdivision is not duplicated. Subdivisions with different sections are considered unique. The Owner shall check with the County Clerk's records for verification. ElDriveway culverts for all Lots shall be designed by a Licensed Professional Engineer. ElIf entrances or driveways are proposed fronting Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) controlled highways, farm -to -market Roads, or others, copies of correspondence with TxDOT are required to be submitted with the Preliminary Plan stating that the general entrance or driveway configuration is within TxDOT's guidelines. Formal approval of the layout from TxDOT is required prior to approval of Final Plat. The diameter and length for each driveway culvert shall be shown on a table on the plat. This information shall also be placed in the deed restrictions for the Lots in the Subdivision. The Owner shall provide a letter of serviceability from an entity or entities providing water service or a letter stating that no service is available within 300 feet of the Subdivision and certifying that the Lots are suitable for private wells. Any Improvements proposed within the Right -of -Way including, but not limited to, irrigation, landscaping, sidewalks, Subdivision identification signs, etc. shall be maintained in accordance with an executed license agreement between the County and the Owner. This check list along with the required copies of the plat shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval. Location and size of all existing and proposed subsurface and surface water drainage facilities, including water bodies on or immediately adjacent to the subject property and detention basins, if needed. All existing and proposed water courses or manmade drainage channels shall be located within a Common Area to be maintained by Owner. MASTER PLAN / PRELIMINARY PLAN REQUIREMENTS Every Master Plan / Preliminary Plan shall include all of the following: nTitle Block with the following information: [] Name, address, telephone and email address of Subdivider, recorded Owner, Engineer and surveyor. nProposed name of Subdivision. (Subdivision name & Street names will be approved through the Brazos County 911.) nDate of preparation. (Include the date of any revisions on the plan.) Engineer's scale in feet. Total area intended to be developed. Proposed number of Lots to be developed. Abstract name and number. nThe Preliminary Plan shall carry the legend "PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY". InNorth arrow. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100 -feet per inch or larger. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. Boundary must include all of Parent Tract. []All horizontal control and vertical elevations depicted on the plan shall be tied to NAD83 and NAVD 1988 Datum. pivicinity map, drawn at a scale appropriate to show all nearby major Roadways and sufficient in detail to identify the location of the proposed plan. riAll adjacent property Owner's names, deed record, or Subdivision name, Block and Lot number, and existing use. InAll parcels within the boundary of the Subdivision shall have a Block and Lot number shown on the face of the plan drawing. nCounty boundaries, City limits, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) boundaries, school district boundaries and Subdivision section and/or phase boundaries. nRoad names and Road designation (whether the Road will be public or privately owned), pavement width and Right -of -Way width for all proposed Roads within and all existing Roads abutting the plan. (Proposed and existing) riAll existing and proposed plan boundary lines, phase/section lines, and Lot lines with bearings and dimensions. [] Utility Services. (Water, wastewater, electrical, natural gas, cable, phone, etc.) (Existing and proposed.) nPipelines: label company with volume and page. nThe Preliminary Plan (including the entire Parent Tract if only a portion of that tract is to be subdivided) shall be shown on a single sheet, regardless of its acreage. The Preliminary Plan may also be shown on multiple sheets if necessary to show all detail and required information as required by this section. [] Size, in acres, of all Daughter Tracts. nCenterline tangent lengths and curve data for all proposed Roads. nEasements and rights -of -way shall be dedicated to the public. The dedication of all Easements and rights -of -way shall be accomplished free of liens. riA• ll proposed Easements and existing Easements of record that have a designated route shall be shown on the plan with bearings and dimensions. The Owner shall be responsible for coordinating with all Utility Providers the location of all utility Easements that are shown on the Final Plat. nB• uilding Setback Lines for each proposed Lot as defined herein. For Subdivisions located within an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), this may be shown on the drawing or included as a plan note. n Metes and bounds description of the property to be subdivided shall be certified by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS), describing a beginning point and reciting bearings and distances to a corner of the original land grant survey of which the Subdivision is a part, according to the best available data. (Shown on drawing; not separate description) nP• rimary control points or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which, later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, Block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the surveyor tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. All boundaries shall be tied to a County control monument. nThe plat note regarding Owner's responsibilities as found in Appendix G.4, if not contained in the Owner's dedication. The On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) setback as required by the Brazos County Health District. nThe location, zone classification and panel Effective Date of the 100 -Year Floodplain as identified on the most current Brazos County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). n If there are any areas within the plat that include a FEMA-mapped Floodplain with a Zone A classification, or if there exists within or adjacent to the plat any water courses whose upstream drainage basin is larger than 64 acres, the plat shall also show the extent of the 100 -Year Floodplain as determined by an engineering study under the seal of a Registered Professional Engineer. This study shall be sufficient in scope to determine and establish a BFE for all points within the plat. nB• FE's shall be shown for all points within the plat, as determined by the results of an engineering study. For plats where a FEMA-mapped Floodplain with a Zone AE classification exists within the plat, the BFE established by the accompanying FEMA- published flood study may be substituted for the engineering study. nA minimum lowest finished floor elevation (FFE) for Buildings shall be established for each Lot within the plat. This minimum FFE shall be 12 -inches higher than the highest spot elevation that is located within five feet outside the perimeter of the Building, or two -feet above the BFE, whichever is higher. nIf any areas within the plat include a 100 -Year Floodplain (as determined by the results of an engineering study or as established by FEMA), a benchmark shall be established by the Owner within or immediately adjacent to the boundary of the plat. The location, description and elevation of the benchmark are required to be identified on the face of the plat. The elevation of this benchmark shall utilize the same vertical datum as that used in the engineering study to determine the FFE. nA drawing containing both existing and proposed topographic information at 2 -FT contour intervals along with the plat boundaries, Easement locations (existing & proposed), and culverts (existing & proposed). riIf the plat contains a water well site, there shall be a depiction of the TCEQ separation requirements per Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 290, Subchapter D Rule §290.41. riIt is the responsibility of the Owner to assure that the proposed name of the Subdivision is not duplicated. Subdivisions with different sections are considered unique. The Owner shall check with the County Clerk's records for verification. n The Owner shall provide a letter of serviceability from an entity or entities providing water service or a letter stating that no service is available within 300 feet of the Subdivision and certifying that the Lots are suitable for private wells. n If entrances or driveways are proposed fronting Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) ❑ controlled highways, farm -to -market Roads, or others, copies of correspondence with TxDOT are required to be submitted with the Preliminary Plan stating that the general entrance or driveway configuration is within TxDOT's guidelines. Formal approval of the layout from TxDOT is required prior to approval of Final Plat. nFor Road widening and drainage purposes the Owner shall dedicate the Right -of -Way. In the case of drainage that is provided for the Lots, it shall be located outside of the Right -of -Way in a private drainage Easement. In the case of drainage that is provided for the Roadway, it shall be located within the Right -of -Way. nIndicate the centerline length of each Road in the proposed Subdivision and its design speed. n If the Roads within the Subdivision will be privately maintained, include the appropriate note(s) per the requirements of Article 8 of these Regulations. riL• ocations of existing and proposed private alleys. nL• ocations of existing and proposed public areas. nL• ocations of other public Improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public facilities. nT• he location of proposed cluster mailboxes, as required. nAll proposed Off -site Easements for infrastructure construction must be shown on the Preliminary Plan. nProposed phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet requirements of these Regulations. nL• ocation and size of all existing and proposed subsurface and surface water drainage facilities, including water bodies on or immediately adjacent to the subject property and detention basins, if needed If the proposed Preliminary Plan is to be a Private Subdivision (containing privately maintained Roads), the title of the plan shall contain the phrase, "A Private Subdivision". Refer to Article 8 for additional requirements. This check list along with the required copies of the plan shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval. Include a description of contributing drainage to the proposed Subdivision. The submittal shall include the area, slope and type of Development in the contributing area. Drainage narrative in compliance with the BCEDG. Clearly indicate the method of sanitary sewage treatment and/or disposal such as, but not limited to, municipal sewer service, private sewage disposal system and On -site sewage facilities including the size and location of all proposed sewer mains and manholes. Preliminary grades for each main between manholes and the depth at each manhole shall also be shown. All existing and proposed water courses or manmade drainage channels shall be located within a Common Area to be maintained by Owner. FINAL PLAT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Every Final Plat must include all of the items provided on the Simplified Plat checklist as well as the following: El For Road widening and drainage purposes the Owner shall dedicate the Right -of - Way. In the case of drainage that is provided for the Lots, it shall be located outside of the Right -of -Way in a private drainage Easement. In the case of drainage that is provided for the Roadway, it shall be located within the Right -of -Way. If public Roadways are to be built as part of the plat, the plat note regarding the responsibility for construction of Roadways as found in Appendix G.3 shall be placed on the face of the plat. The plat note regarding Owner's responsibilities as found in Appendix G.4, if not contained in the Owner's dedication. Indicate the centerline length of each Road in the proposed Subdivision and its design speed. If more than four mailboxes are to be provided within the Subdivision, cluster mailboxes shall be provided and the location of such shall be indicated on the plat. If the Roads within the Subdivision will be privately maintained, include the appropriate note(s) per the requirements of Article 8 of these Regulations. Locations of existing and proposed private alleys. Locations of existing and proposed public areas. Locations of other Public Improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public facilities. All Off -site Easements for infrastructure construction must be shown on the Final Plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument Easements were filed. Separate instrument Easements must be filed prior or concurrently with Final Plat. Proposed phasing. All phasing shall be in accordance with the approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plan and each phase must be able to stand alone to meet requirements of these Regulations. Infrastructure costs should be separate for each phase of the Subdivision. Location and size of all existing andproposed subsurface and surface water drainage facilities, including water bodies on or immediately adjacent to the subject property. If the proposed Final Plat is to be a Private Subdivision (containing privately maintained Roads), the title of the plat shall contain the phrase, "A Private Subdivision". Refer to Article 8 for additional requirements. In the case of an On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF), the Developer shall be responsible for providing a Development Plan, as performed by a Professional Sanitarian, a Licensed Professional Engineer, or person certified as required by TCEQ Title 30 TAC Chapter 285. The sewage disposal plan shall be performed according rules and regulations established by the Brazos County On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) Order and TCEQ Title 30 TAC Chapter 285. PARKLAND 1P 400 NLI6HBORINNID PARK 15' PrO RfJN AREA C40N B:CENTIR (105]]/1]0 00x021) N66' 30 006 -05006' 06633/1.60°no3 36 O COMMON AREA 1400 0.921 AC. (1001]0/1000 ° 0cn `(105.03/1]0 20130017 06T 33' SEW - 33600' CANTON DRIVE 19. PLC 30x02/100 PUE r 16 PARKLAND IP JOU NEN:IMORHOODP.1Rw 8 36 37 0.132 AC al 38 3 0,132 AC. n zl 21 22 • ORIGINAL PLAT VOL 18633, PG 130 OPRBCT PrDE °°00051 ° 0.eo5'AREACJm 6V33' 006-360.0 20' PUE m (10203/110 n 50.00 8 15. acattN.I 15 al 39 p 0.132 AC. 31 40 ₹ 0.132 AC. 8 I 33600. SOUTH 6633' 02 AEON DRrv6 arzoct to 41 ₹ 0.132 AC. 8 r;l (I CPR c1) 42 p 0.132 AC. 43 0.129 AC. PUE n BEG"NINc CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION rrt skr �a�B°rani 005a°u«rT°1 030.000000a°m00i 03, a 10 a. ..16NDwn I 21 REPLAT rOttiETrOF BRAZOS wa a as 0000°`°:5 as 121evZrp.a L'M.�aY1 °.°`ei0,,t'a"300320"'" ' "'" ' ' a,≤ .11510 mmcha. wee.v Nand me 00000 010_aryo1 00 23 CMDFICATE OF COUNTY CLEW 8 i /100 21'00011111 10 s (3010Ti120 O`PRBOD 05313/222 0010011 01080 mM mm 511 5PWSEAEmim° m°E ° R µ trc 'CAaPu"Dr „TALI RE ESTI mt: Td-TTPEa ° °R .x m°m mm 023 0 M i IDS °RED x , x 2 (SWING r m en K1N SHOWN MOON IS BASED m FROM N THE TDMS STATE PVM CENTRAL ZONE 010 NORM 'BIT OF FRL PLY BY • :2 SIDE aiiOF THM '��..zos N THE eOxn'Axo ccnro"w', AMERCING TO .',o„ Enx,. No THE sE,aL� m+ s _ P _ °P.EM eoNBBxmr. ,zesoilxo (o.Pn.x.°.i.l.: GGG a]w i• o"ANR°N µ5,i"pomE PLBsnc cw s<urPm xwR s11a+�,xc BIu. 50.501 Ar ALL mr.RDANCE WITH THE _ Nrs uxl].a xMm m"mwsc xxx�oPAl u5ury °mwcr NO. IV. DATED ,wv.xr DM PREPARED ay SCHULTZ ENGINEER.. 30 10 0 x 0x - ME cx0w u]ccMs. Mras. Rrt0 w-x0a°zA xxusmrls u¢ �025gn n nu Baru+r. z x0. 5200E IN FEET 1DD or ME ammo P°5LIC sick' oP aa' corm ] (AMEENDED NOVEMBER I o PACE ENA°1'r (OA). THE., crxL Twrvc`?°s'r1, wrz ov°MrwEE%,71 4.7,1 A, �oa`s FEIDRUARY ID 2015. SUPpLEMENT 4 (EFFECTIVE UO0). • swNAm sLww ruun611ix�° os muxn uuwoPu anon G1smiM o. I. A"° II. A WATER DES. REPORT FOR THIS SIZEDMISION WILD SE PROVIDED PER CRY sruguaos. Or L aim x 21325221103022012222 510022200.002 SPL000205T20. xO,x ED:n°N 13. PER ThIE IXECUTED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CCx5 LI 10°13 MIA) � BETWEEN 1x005 C1TY 0 OF • EGE STATION 0x0 14. STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING ORAINIDE CHANNELS. UNDERGROUND xNATER CONVEYANCE SYSTOZS. ANO OETDMON PONDS WILL ED UMITAINED ERKOS COUNTY MUD NO. 1 UNTIL /WIDMANN BY THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION. UPON ANNEYADON. THE MNDIENANCE OF THE DETENTION PONDS DILL EE THE RESPONSIF0UTY OF ME HEM UNLESS DIE DIY REouests A co 741lialnuo TAXING AUTHORITY FOR IllE PURPOSE OF DETENTION POND ILMNTENANCE BR,7 cuNn ANN BRAT cEf4sar ANtr i - 10. ELECRIIGL SERVILE FOR THIS OEVELOPNENT IS PROVIDED BY ENTERGY. mrEH 00130 N . 1120°x5 ANN/00 IFS*SI R 1FhROREO IN E 20. NIPRONNO THIS PLAT BY TIE COUNIMIONER'S COURT OF BRAZOS CO., TEXAS, IT IS 0 0`<u)r01 P 1 y01032220002320�'1034 T� nnalµ2a cas. PLAITING P1.11, DEVELOPMENT OF DM PROPERTY. 'NE COUNTY ASSUMES NO oEiAnNFOR THE ACCURACY OMREPRESDITATONS BY THE OTHER PARTIES IN THIS PLAT. flOODPIAIN SIMAGE NAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE NE REMDS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE FIVALLY SEM ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY DIE COUNTY. 22. /41,..Poltc1C. ORAZDGE EASEMENTS DILL EE IMPROVED ACCORDING M THE ORNILME POUGY 0.NO OESIGN ED ET HE LOT OVNERS ORTHE HO0. 23.41, DPA,B O ALIEAON,. :. C 11x0 NCSm NC PPmE ME "-" lx T"' 30 15 0 CERTFICATE OF THE SURVEYOR NarTrOFMOS woe "1natNtm.M Places was mr .werv�sbrvn Pi SCALE IN FEET 0013040000 00 SIN flat lamztoYthv roamet t my SmaiJv�m CERTIFICATE OF CITY DARN. County Judge. Bra., Gaunt, Texas U" Y 11204TH I 2ED0' PnxeM mlarxvn 0°a mwvmnle Ten LEGEND ) °PART ROW OWNER/DEVELOPER: EV SOUTHERN POINTE DEVELOPMENT. WC. CotLEMIDTOWN DRIVE OE STATION, Tx 77x15 nmB6s] A,IT wgm�"N°'I'MO BUDDING LINES M SET OUT ON DAT DO APPLY M 110 TRACT: (1azm/0] w:mONDE9rmM TV°UXtrwo rS17 x¢ ewssxwT m xE5Twcncxs Dots APP.. To MK _(M 0 02 watt) zo' 00,..00.2:°"° a�MOR�.t"T M L",m°r MLA, MD coos ROTC+°,: - Bo0.0/20 oENrn NtA Er way Or.A.60900001,o WNNO, TM. INC. Dom APPLY TO THIS - n=>/OC °R1OOn TDITTT RESS / 0,x,,.6 FIETA T OCtS NOT APPL.,o UT TO.cT. - RELEITR1) °Cma P1mTMrs M" A�GS EC BaEm RETUNED 5, tIENT [DES PPLY M OaPAm w PARTIAL INal 1)x • mrrxw TJArogwa r .°RtorEDT o°m APPLY oas, TRACT - Sawa Ai°s°Pim°,r1"/31 2 15];0001 av°m`co°]u e1`.w0A' 000 Sri. 2,,T rsF hill m of * =VII FruL LLC °sE Or i.ol, Nw °nLI 5 OVA cell MAR ' 1311:379 LEAOL. OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY. TT.XAS IONIMM6. SND 0.921 ALIZZ ENDO MORBEGINNING IA Mmov NM,. "eta vOxNxr,I,s, imowmw�knn.A.n1 (06.7on°w.ItiZe"axed TZ.,:ot)0¢ VICINITY MAP FINAL PLAT oF SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION SECTION 400 BLOCK 79. LOTS 37-43 0.921 ACRES BEING A REPLAT OF BLOCK 79, COMMON AREA 1400 SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION SECTION 400 VOLUME 18633, PAGE 132 OPRBCT STERRETT D. SMITH LEAGUE SURVEY, A-210 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SCALE I• - ° 202,4 SURVEYOR: 11,41,0666.1 ENGINEER: Trin NO. Inn BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS DEPARTMENT: Road and Bridge NUMBER: CC2024 Winding Creek Estates ph 5 FP Blk 6 Lot 71R & Common Area 3-Replat of Blk 6 Lot 71 DATE OF COURT MEETING: 7/30/2024 ITEM: Request approval of the Final Plat of Winding Creek Estates Phase 5, 4.479 Acres, Block 6, Lot 71 R and Common Area 3 being a Replat of Winding Creek Estates Phase 5 Block 6, Lot 71; J.C. Stuteville Survey, A-216; City of College Station ETJ, Brazos County, Texas. Site is located in Precinct 1. Commissioners Court I Karen Tyler TO: FROM: DATE: FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGETED: DOLLAR AMOUNT: NOTES/EXCEPTIONS: ATTACHMENTS: File Name Description 2024-06- Application Development for Develo ment 10_FP_COUNTY APP_WC_Ph 5_Lat 71_RP_FIRST.pdf 2024-07-18_FP WC_Ph_5_Lot 71 RP_RTC 2.pdf Plat 07/25/2024 False False $0.00 Winding Creek Estates Phase 5, Block 6, Lot 71 recorded in Volume 19191, Page 274. Tvae Backup Material Cover Memo Duane Peters County Judge Date Brazos County Road & Bridge Office 2617 S H 21 West Bryan, TX 77803 Telephone: (979) 822-2127 Fax: (979 775-0456 Email: plats c(�brazoscountytx.gov PLAT APPLICATION SUBJECT PROPERTY INFORMATION APPLICATION DATE *:10-10-2022 RESUBMITTAL: YES nNo PROJECT / SUBDIVISION NAME: Winding Creek Estates Phase 5 - Replat Lot 71 PROJECT ADDRESS OR LOCATION: Rolling Meadow Drive, College Station, TX LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Winding Creek Estates Phase 5, Block 6 Lot 71 IF RESUBMITTAL, PROJECT FORMERLY KNOWN AS: N/A NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 TOTAL ACREAGE 4.479 JURISDICTION : u CITY LIMITS f College Station ETJ u OUTSIDE ALL CITY LIMITS AND ETJs Notification of Application completeness will be given within 10 days of Application date. All incomplete Applications will be rejected. This Application shall expire five (5) years from the Application date of the project. TYPE OF APPLICATION MASTER PLAN SIMPLIFIED PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAN FINAL PLAT AMENDING PLAT 1 REPLAT ,APPLICATION' PURPOSE COMMERCIAL ❑ MANUFACTURED HOME RENTAL COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL POTHER (Please explain): FLOODPLAIN YES NO IS ANY OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN A FLOODPLAIN OR FLOOD HAZARD AREA? Acknowledgment: The flood'hazard boundary maps and other flood data used by Brazos County in evaluating flood hazards to proposed Developments are considered reasonable and accurate for regulatory purposes and are based on the best available scientific and engineering data On rare occasions greater floods can and will occur and flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. Issuance of a Floodplain Permit in accordance with the Brazos County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance does not imply that Development outside the areas of special flood hazard will be free from flooding or flood damage. Issuance of a permit shall not create liability on the part of Brazos County or any officer or employee of Brazos County in the event flooding or flood damage does occur. WILL ANY CONSTRUCTION OCCUR IN TxDOT RIGHT-OF-WAYS? DIGITAL FILE SUBMISSION COUNTY ENGINEER ADOBE (.pdf file) AutoCAD (.dwg file) (Email To: plats@brazoscountytx.gov) 911 ADDRESSING nADOBE (.pdf file) AutoCAD (.dwg file) (Email To: ois oAbrazoscountytx.gov) .`CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT. INFORMATION. >_ ..._` FIRM NAME: Wellborn Winding Creek, LLC CONTACT: M.L.Schehin ADDRESS: 3000 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 302 CITY: Bryan STATE: TX ZIP: 77802 PHONE: 281-642-4924 FAX: EMAIL: ml@mls-development.com PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION FIRM NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: EMAIL: ENGINEER INFORMATION FIRM NAME: Schultz Engineering, LLC CONTACT: Ricky Flores, PE ADDRESS: 911 Southwest Parkway E CITY: College Station STATE: TX ZIP: 77840 PHONE: 979-764-3900 FAX: 979-764-3910 EMAIL: eng@schultzeng.com SURVEYORINFORMATION , ' ' , FIRM NAME: Kerr Surveying, LLC CONTACT: Nathan Paul Kerr ADDRESS: 409 N Texas Ave CITY: Bryan STATE: TX ZIP: 77803 PHONE: 979-268-3195 FAX: EMAIL: nathan@kerrsurveying.net OTHER INFORMATION FIRM NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER CONSENT / AGENT AUTHORIZATION By my signature, I hereby affirm that I am the property Owner of record, or if the Applicant is an organization or business entity, that authorization has been granted to represent the Owner, organization or business in this Application. I certify that the preceding information is complete and accurate, and it is understood that I to the Development/Subdivision of this property. SIGNATURE: t% �g �b"'J PRINTED NAME: M.L. Schehin DATE: /1 7O2,2 - SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: DATE: By signing this form, the Owner of the property authorizes Brazos County to begin proceedings in accordance with the process for this type of Application indicated on page one of this Application. The Owner further acknowledges that submission of an Application does not in any way obligate the County to approve the Application and that although County staff may make certain recommendations regarding this Application, the Commissioner's Court may not follow that recommendation and may make a final decision that does not conform to the staff's recommendation. CALCULATIONS OF FEES MASTER PLAN: No charge FINAL PLAT: $150 + $10 per lot SIMPLIFIED PLAT: $100 AMENDING PLAT: $100 PRELIMINARY PLAN: $150 + $5 per lot REPLAT: $150 RECEIPT BY BRAZOS COUNTY (Official Use Only) DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED / REJECTED: / / SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: Receipt of this Application by Brazos County does not provide confirmation or acceptance of a complete Application, nor does it waive requirements for any additional information not contained as part of this Application which may also be needed as a part of the review process. Application Check List: Copies of finished plat with corrections (if any): Three (3) hard copies to Brazos County One (1) .pdf copy to Brazos County One (1) .dwg copy to Brazos County One (1) hard copy to Brazos County Health District One (1) hard copy to Brazos County 911 One (1) hard copy to local Water District or Company ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Letters of approval (to be sent by the approving institution directly to Brazos County Engineering): Letter from Brazos County Health District - For On -site sewage evaluation. Letter from Brazos County 911 - For Road names. Letter from Water District or Company. - Stating water availability, etc. ✓ ✓ ✓ If property is within an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of a City: pproval notification from appropriate City. Applicant attests that they have signed this Application in the capacity designated, if any, and further attests that they have read document and the statement contained herein and any attached are true and factual. All Applicants are encouraged to review the County Regulations prior to any plat submittal. It is understood that this Application is not finished or dated until all documents listed above are filed at the Brazos County Engineering Office and all applicable blanks are filled in the Application above. SIMPLIFIED FINAL PLAT REQUIREMENTS Every Simplified Plat shall include all of the following: ri Title Block with the following information: [] Name, address, telephone and email address of Subdivider, recorded Owner, Engineer and surveyor. riProposed name of Subdivision. (Subdivision name & Street names will be approved through the Brazos County 911.) (Replats need to retain original Subdivision name.) Date of preparation. (Include the date of any revisions on the plat.) Engineer's scale in feet. Total area intended to be developed. Proposed number of Lots to be developed. Re -plat or Amending Plat, existing Lot and Block description or Abstract name and number. North arrow. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100 -feet per inch or larger. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. Boundary must include all of Parent Tract. All horizontal control and vertical elevations depicted on the plat shall be tied to NAD83 and NAVD 1988 Datum. riA vicinity map, drawn at a scale appropriate to show all nearby major Roadways and sufficient in detail to identify the location of the proposed plat. nAll adjacent property Owner's names, deed record, or Subdivision name, Block and Lot number, and existing use. riAll parcels within the boundary of the Subdivision shall have a Block and Lot number shown on the face of the plat drawing. []County boundaries, City limits, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) boundaries, school district boundaries and Subdivision section and/or phase boundaries. Road names and Right -of -Way width for all Roads. (Existing and proposed.) [] All existing and proposed plat boundary lines, phase/section lines, and Lot lines with bearings and dimensions. riUtility Services. (Water, wastewater, electrical, natural gas, cable, phone, etc.) Pipelines: label company with volume and page. All certification language as found in Appendix C. Easements and rights -of -way shall be dedicated to the public. The dedication of all Easements and rights -of -way shall be accomplished free of liens. The dedication shall be accompanied by the Certificate of Ownership and Dedication language found in Appendix C. The Owner's and any lien holder's dedication, and restrictions if any duly acknowledged in the manner required for acknowledgement of deeds, shall also be provided. []All proposed Easements and existing Easements of record that have a designated route shall be shown on the plat with bearings and dimensions. The Owner shall be responsible for coordinating with all Utility Providers the location of all utility Easements that are shown on the Final Plat. nBuilding Setback Lines for each proposed Lot as defined herein. For Subdivisions located within an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), this may be shown on the drawing or included as a plat note. [] Metes and bounds description of the property to be subdivided shall be certified by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS), describing a beginning point and reciting bearings and distances to a corner of the original land grant survey of which the Subdivision is a part, according to the best available data. (Shown on drawing; not separate description) [] All Subdivision external corners, angle points, points of curvature and points of tangency shall be set by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS) before the plat is recorded and shall be a TxDOT "Light Duty Setting" monument with an aluminum or bronze disk as specified in Appendix C of the TxDOT Survey Manual of April 2011. Alternately, Bernsten® Standard Aluminum Base monument (or equivalent as approved by the County Engineer) embedded and backfilled with compacted sand may be used. All Daughter Lots, Blocks and rights -of -way within the Subdivision shall be fully monumented in compliance with the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveying Act and the Board Rules set by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS) before the plat is recorded. riPrimary control points or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which, later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, Block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the surveyor tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. All boundaries shall be tied to a County control monument. [] The plat note regarding Owner's responsibilities as found in Appendix G.4, if not contained in the Owner's dedication. [] The On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) setback as required by the Brazos County Health District. The location, zone classification and panel Effective Date of the 100 -Year Floodplain as identified on the most current Brazos County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). [] If there are any areas within the plat that include a FEMA-mapped Floodplain with a Zone A classification, or if there exists within or adjacent to the plat any water courses whose upstream drainage basin is larger than 64 acres, the plat shall also show the extent of the 100 -Year Floodplain as determined by an engineering study under the seal of a Registered Professional Engineer. This study shall be sufficient in scope to determine and establish a BFE for all points within the plat. nBFE's shall be shown for all points within the plat, as determined by the results of an engineering study. For plats where a FEMA-mapped Floodplain with a Zone AE classification exists within the plat, the BFE established by the accompanying FEMA- published flood study may be substituted for the engineering study. nA minimum lowest finished floor elevation (FFE) for Buildings shall be established for each Lot within the plat. This minimum FFE shall be twelve (12) inches higher than the highest spot elevation that is located within five (5) feet outside the perimeter of the Building, or two -feet above the BFE, whichever is higher. nIf any areas within the plat include a 100 -Year Floodplain (as determined by the results of an engineering study or as established by FEMA), a benchmark shall be established by the Owner within or immediately adjacent to the boundary of the plat. The location, description and elevation of the benchmark are required to be identified on the face of the plat. The elevation of this benchmark shall utilize the same vertical datum as that used in the engineering study to determine the FFE. [] A separate drawing containing both existing and proposed topographic information at 2 -FT contour intervals along with the plat boundaries, Easement locations (existing & proposed), and culverts (existing & proposed). n The certification language as found in Appendix C for both the Commissioner's Court approval and the County Clerk's filing certificate shall be located on the face of the plat. These signatures shall be obtained after approval by the Brazos County Commissioner's Court. n If any Lot within the plat will be served by a well or an On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF), a letter must be provided by the Brazos County Health District stating they have examined the plat and that it is in compliance with the Brazos County On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) Regulations, Construction Standards for On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) Regulations as published by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). This letter must be signed by a representative of the District prior to Final Plat approval. n If the plat contains a water well site, there shall be a depiction of the TCEQ separation requirements per Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 290, Subchapter D Rule §290.41. fn If rural route mailboxes are proposed, the plat note as found in Appendix G.2 for placement of such mailboxes shall be shown on the face of the plat. riIf any areas of the plat are located outside of all incorporated areas, the plat note as found in Appendix G.1 regarding the requirement to obtain a unique Development Permit from the Brazos County Floodplain Administrator prior to locating or altering a structure or land shall be placed on the plat. It is the responsibility of the Owner to assure that the proposed name of the Subdivision is not duplicated. Subdivisions with different sections are considered unique. The Owner shall check with the County Clerk's records for verification. Driveway culverts for all Lots shall be designed by a Licensed Professional Engineer. If entrances or driveways are proposed fronting Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) controlled highways, farm -to -market Roads, or others, copies of correspondence with TxDOT are required to be submitted with the Preliminary Plan stating that the general entrance or driveway configuration is within TxDOT's guidelines. Formal approval of the layout from TxDOT is required prior to approval of Final Plat. The diameter and length for each driveway culvert shall be shown on a table on the plat. This information shall also be placed in the deed restrictions for the Lots in the Subdivision. The Owner shall provide a letter of serviceability from an entity or entities providing water service or a letter stating that no service is available within 300 feet of the Subdivision and certifying that the Lots are suitable for private wells. nAny Improvements proposed within the Right -of -Way including, but not limited to, irrigation, landscaping, sidewalks, Subdivision identification signs, etc. shall be maintained in accordance with an executed license agreement between the County and the Owner. nThis check list along with the required copies of the plat shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval. Location and size of all existing and proposed subsurface and surface water drainage facilities, including water bodies on or immediately adjacent to the subject property and detention basins, if needed. nAll existing and proposed water courses or manmade drainage channels shall be located within a Common Area to be maintained by Owner. El L MASTER PLAN / PRELIMINARY PLAN REQUIREMENTS Every Master Plan / Preliminary Plan shall include all of the following: [] Title Block with the following information: [] Name, address, telephone and email address of Subdivider, recorded Owner, Engineer and surveyor. [] Proposed name of Subdivision. (Subdivision name & Street names will be approved through the Brazos County 911.) [] Date of preparation. (Include the date of any revisions on the plan.) Engineer's scale in feet. Total area intended to be developed. Proposed number of Lots to be developed. Abstract name and number. []The Preliminary Plan shall carry the legend "PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY". [] North arrow. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100 -feet per inch or larger. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. Boundary must include all of Parent Tract. [] All horizontal control and vertical elevations depicted on the plan shall be tied to NAD83 and NAVD 1988 Datum. []A vicinity map, drawn at a scale appropriate to show all nearby major Roadways and sufficient in detail to identify the location of the proposed plan. []All adjacent property Owner's names, deed record, or Subdivision name, Block and Lot number, and existing use. All parcels within the boundary of the Subdivision shall have a Block and Lot number shown on the face of the plan drawing. [] County boundaries, City limits, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) boundaries, school district boundaries and Subdivision section and/or phase boundaries. [] Road names and Road designation (whether the Road will be public or privately owned), pavement width and Right -of -Way width for all proposed Roads within and all existing Roads abutting the plan. (Proposed and existing) []All existing and proposed plan boundary lines, phase/section lines, and Lot lines with bearings and dimensions. [] Utility Services. (Water, wastewater, electrical, natural gas, cable, phone, etc.) (Existing and proposed.) [] Pipelines: label company with volume and page. [] The Preliminary Plan (including the entire Parent Tract if only a portion of that tract is to be subdivided) shall be shown on a single sheet, regardless of its acreage. The Preliminary Plan may also be shown on multiple sheets if necessary to show all detail and required information as required by this section. [] Size, in acres, of all Daughter Tracts. [] Centerline tangent lengths and curve data for all proposed Roads. [] Easements and rights -of -way shall be dedicated to the public. The dedication of all Easements and rights -of -way shall be accomplished free of liens. El El El El El El 111 El All proposed Easements and existing Easements of record that have a designated route shall be shown on the plan with bearings and dimensions. The Owner shall be responsible for coordinating with all Utility Providers the location of all utility Easements that are shown on the Final Plat. Building Setback Lines for each proposed Lot as defined herein. For Subdivisions located within an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), this may be shown on the drawing or included as a plan note. Metes and bounds description of the property to be subdivided shall be certified by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS), describing a beginning point and reciting bearings and distances to a corner of the original land grant survey of which the Subdivision is a part, according to the best available data. (Shown on drawing; not separate description) Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which, later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, Block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the surveyor tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. All boundaries shall be tied to a County control monument. The plat note regarding Owner's responsibilities as found in Appendix G.4, if not contained in the Owner's dedication. The On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) setback as required by the Brazos County Health District. The location, zone classification and panel Effective Date of the 100 -Year Floodplain as identified on the most current Brazos County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). If there are any areas within the plat that include a FEMA-mapped Floodplain with a Zone A classification, or if there exists within or adjacent to the plat any water courses whose upstream drainage basin is larger than 64 acres, the plat shall also show the extent of the 100 -Year Floodplain as determined by an engineering study under the seal of a Registered Professional Engineer. This study shall be sufficient in scope to determine and establish a BFE for all points within the plat. BFE's shall be shown for all points within the plat, as determined by the results of an engineering study. For plats where a FEMA-mapped Floodplain with a Zone AE classification exists within the plat, the BFE established by the accompanying FEMA- published flood study may be substituted for the engineering study. A minimum lowest finished floor elevation (FFE) for Buildings shall be established for each Lot within the plat. This minimum FFE shall be 12 -inches higher than the highest spot elevation that is located within five feet outside the perimeter of the Building, or two -feet above the BFE, whichever is higher. If any areas within the plat include a 100 -Year Floodplain (as determined by the results of an engineering study or as established by FEMA), a benchmark shall be established by the Owner within or immediately adjacent to the boundary of the plat. The location, description and elevation of the benchmark are required to be identified on the face of the plat. The elevation of this benchmark shall utilize the same vertical datum as that used in the engineering study to determine the FFE. A drawing containing both existing and proposed topographic information at 2 -FT contour intervals along with the plat boundaries, Easement locations (existing & proposed), and culverts (existing & proposed). If the plat contains a water well site, there shall be a depiction of the TCEQ separation requirements per Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 290, Subchapter D Rule §290.41. It is the responsibility of the Owner to assure that the proposed name of the Subdivision is not duplicated. Subdivisions with different sections are considered unique. The Owner shall check with the County Clerk's records for verification. The Owner shall provide a letter of serviceability from an entity or entities providing water service or a letter stating that no service is available within 300 feet of the Subdivision and certifying that the Lots are suitable for private wells. If entrances or driveways are proposed fronting Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) controlled highways, farm -to -market Roads, or others, copies of correspondence with TxDOT are required to be submitted with the Preliminary Plan stating that the general entrance or driveway configuration is within TxDOT's guidelines. Formal approval of the layout from TxDOT is required prior to approval of Final Plat. For Road widening and drainage purposes the Owner shall dedicate the Right -of -Way. In the case of drainage that is provided for the Lots, it shall be located outside of the Right -of -Way in a private drainage Easement. In the case of drainage that is provided for the Roadway, it shall be located within the Right -of -Way. Indicate the centerline length of each Road in the proposed Subdivision and its design speed. If the Roads within the Subdivision will be privately maintained, include the appropriate note(s) per the requirements of Article 8 of these Regulations. Locations of existing and proposed private alleys. Locations of existing and proposed public areas. Locations of other public Improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public facilities. The location of proposed cluster mailboxes, as required. All proposed Off -site Easements for infrastructure construction must be shown on the Preliminary Plan. Proposed phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet requirements of these Regulations. Location and size of all existing and proposed subsurface and surface water drainage facilities, including water bodies on or immediately adjacent to the subject property and detention basins, if needed. If the proposed Preliminary Plan is to be a Private Subdivision (containing privately maintained Roads), the title of the plan shall contain the phrase, "A Private Subdivision". Refer to Article 8 for additional requirements. This check list along with the required copies of the plan shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval. Include a description of contributing drainage to the proposed Subdivision. The submittal shall include the area, slope and type of Development in the contributing area. Drainage narrative in compliance with the BCEDG. Clearly indicate the method of sanitary sewage treatment and/or disposal such as, but not limited to, municipal sewer service, private sewage disposal system and On -site sewage facilities including the size and location of all proposed sewer mains and manholes. Preliminary grades for each main between manholes and the depth at each manhole shall also be shown. All existing and proposed water courses or manmade drainage channels shall be located within a Common Area to be maintained by Owner. FINAL PLAT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Every Final Plat must include all of the items provided on the Simplified Plat checklist as well as the following: n For Road widening and drainage purposes the Owner shall dedicate the Right -of - Way. In the case of drainage that is provided for the Lots, it shall be located outside of the Right -of -Way in a private drainage Easement. In the case of drainage that is provided for the Roadway, it shall be located within the Right -of -Way. n If public Roadways are to be built as part of the plat, the plat note regarding the responsibility for construction of Roadways as found in Appendix G.3 shall be placed on the face of the plat. n The plat note regarding Owner's responsibilities as found in Appendix G.4, if not contained in the Owner's dedication. n Indicate 'the centerline length of each Road in the proposed Subdivision and its design speed. n If more than four mailboxes are to be provided within the Subdivision, cluster mailboxes shall be provided and the location of such shall be indicated on the plat. n If the Roads within the Subdivision will be privately maintained, include the appropriate note(s) per the requirements of Article 8 of. these Regulations. • Locations of existing and proposed private alleys. ElLocations of existing and proposed public areas. n Locations of other Public Improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public facilities. ElAll Off -site Easements for infrastructure construction must be shown on the Final Plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument Easements were filed. Separate instrument Easements must be filed prior or concurrently with Final Plat. Proposed phasing. All phasing shall be in accordance with the approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plan and each phase must be able to stand alone to meet requirements of these Regulations. Infrastructure costs should be separate for each phase of the Subdivision. Location and size of all existing and proposed subsurface and surface water drainage facilities, including water bodies on or immediately adjacent to the subject property. If the proposed Final Plat is to be a Private Subdivision (containing privately maintained Roads), the title of the plat shall contain the phrase, "A Private Subdivision". Refer to Article 8 for additional requirements. nIn the case of an On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF), the Developer shall be responsible for providing a Development Plan, as performed by a Professional Sanitarian, a Licensed Professional Engineer, or person certified as required by TCEQ Title 30 TAC Chapter 285. The sewage disposal plan shall be performed according rules and regulations established by the Brazos County On -site Sewage Facility (OSSF) Order and TCEQ Title 30 TAC Chapter 285. 0919 1 /2) PUE \ /X/" / \ /,•/ / / N/ N N. VARIES 05.1 /SAW N N \(\ *��°o \ ifi91si%nq % LOMO MIA AC. RI OP (15191/274) PtelAtARAINA 615101/6791) 15. 09191/,) \ \ CC( OF LOCEN "7'2'5'1 -'ssan 3.1.11."X. (9191/275. I 1 ,(9°91/270) \ (1901/24)� (°919 %nO l/0 IRON ROOS FOUND (09 p91a8/siq�\ — — STAMPED NEW( 1 TAMPED RER( S.M.. \ _ o .,/2,4) 2i i a POE 0910/ PR WATERI5295/53 \ )(9(91/ ;n REVS ZINGS ..767 1565 / CT 4' 4 ((019Vn.) 0/F (19191/070) )(2(0 /9F2 eENONG BRANCH DRIVE (01PUE 51/270) ORIGINAL PLAT VOL. 19191, PG. 274 / / N• \ PUE (1919°/97., \ / \//N Trat \ VAR. (1910) 91/27 \ IC DR (15191'./.2T41 �\ (1919(/279) CM OF G3 9NOVu�FM MOCK 1.181 AC. ((9191/20) I 1 / / EAREDENT 05101/274) \\ 16' RUE ((9(91/9(9) \ 5. PRE (11/91) / ET (19191/27e) v I WAIVED .ERR..E.wc • (89151/07.) 1/z rwV0(F6u00 ( :t'2 MORI/n16. 4') ITI \ 11 le' PUE 0919I/20) (S. POE (9151/274) 3501 AC. (19191/274) BENDING WV...MOVE RVAORANAGE 9 s /979 (() E. ix rcmR suR(09 00 51 16299/53 PIJ 10. PUE 09,91/274) J e I N /4.-:.°NEuaOO E c 1 ) LS LOT 711.1. / 09197 US //04 \ REPLAT (/r9( sieAMRm /n 1/5 ) 19359/072 9 7; 529/ RENA= OTTM 4'.7.17 ACRE TRACT 15604/144 TER (0(0;;n0)A CONLAIONAMA 7 \ N/F ramixc CREEK Assocullox 0.7 E TRACT 9/400 900 (209/\ 5D z2®D SCALE IN FEET LEGEND FRUIT IZJI.01 CaSTWO RCM Of VAT MIT. Fume =Ca LASIIITt V.) 5®D SCALE IN FEET ' 19191/274. PUE 09.51/574.1._- (/0 1R ODE ABLE UNE / DIRECCON LI so aVE R2r 02•W Lt 860. 04•E 555. Or RrE SAI LIO LIS LIB Curve oble cuR,E F .65111 RAW. DELTA TAND CHORD CHORD ON CS 25554. 79750' 015,71, 12554' 355.7, 63rOMEAV VICINITY MAP FINAL PLAT OF WINDING CREEK ESTATES PHASE 5 4.479 ACRES BLOCK 6, LOT 71R AND COMMON AREA 3 BEING A REPLAT OF WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 5 BLOCK 6, LOT 71 VOL. 19191, PG. 274 J.C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY. A-2)6 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS I LOT OWNER/DEVELOPER: 77952 SCALE e,2026D. M: SURVEYOR: 1979, 2.13,199 ENGINEER CDUL { 1515,1643300 SWIM 1. COORDINATES AND corm. ZONE GRID BEARING 03 ( F ;�E 01220 COLLEGE STATON GEODETIC CONTROL STATION 14ROU5945770027 MON . (x17,,,<za,a. E.:3507535.952) MO AS ESTABUSI.0 Eff CAS OBSERMATION. ,m USIx1VIDA) cox4xm c,T ErAR RE , oxB,s„o.4a, x04 2:., i,'sc u `E„xEx.'Ewi wf°R,i. ,4,n i'acg im .mss. x ' '0/0 08 N 4000 0 OrvO,E P11M5 OPS 41 40 os o'""`,Eo"0 041,442 SET 41 5. DISTANCES SHOWN ON CURVES APE CHORD LENGTHS B. DRIVEWAY0AMESS FROM RESIDENDAS LOM SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED ONTO BETIDING 7. DRIVEWAY CULVERTS SHALL COMPLY WM BRAZOS C0.717 SPECIFICATIONS. 8. HIE WARTY SUPPLIER FOR TNIS DEVELOPMENT IS IME WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT. FADENT OF THE ISSIalEMOTAZESE:ATER,Mg PALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ROW TO O.1E sHOOC 4100 THE E,I,M-,E0.roRVA JUNISOICROx (Err) BE THE 0177 10. IME strewn.. is Lcurto MIME sunorr tsp. 11. %LIMING. „,,SETB.=,,,ARE 257 AMKENT TO ALL STREETS ACCORDING M BRAZOS COUNTY F.A7gol RELOTrom..,PIAILITAMUSCJIIONAL BUILDING SETBACKS MY BE M. ELECTRIC REFACE FOR MS OEVEUVRENT WILL BE FRONDED FIT BRYAN TOGS UTILITIES (4017. rx1 01001 1 OOTOOU100 ,e OS841, 82 ,MMTED Ix rx0 I6 4,x ViNoMTPETE7Ings°c=CILITELMWTFill717LIM0VWZRTES THAT T,IE MET, JorrgElVsTM HOT WY ASPNALTO ACINCREM TO MEET CITY OF 14. COMPArruOVILLOR AN PIONEERED SIA0 IS REQUIRED FOR LOTS .T HAVE GREATER MANAGE WAYS SHAU. BE PRESERVED IN THEIR CONDEMN AND PAMPAS ROW 17F WATER IN THE IXISTING DRAINAGE WAYS SW, NOT BE OBSTRIICIED. IxOR w FOR 4 Ns x. 01. =Fr Mrosl WWE AN 7AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT. PERRIT ss o B ME BRAZOS COMM HEATH 4<w RESPECTIVELY. �EBBT4,RME,4eE11E=6 alroxE1E.PRxrol, - s�%4.10101/271..cm° . " x� ooP "� T TO - �T44 �1, x2704 r0.. :�w�°3Eµ as 3- 3,7784 oa oiR o WET 20ENEx; ,Aox 1. Tor 01,f , f 12 010 00 - 041/472 04: NATURE AM T E NOT6 OWN HEREON. T THa� zs.15080 DOES (o1430T rC E, B M ERITw 6. ry 4,P FAV uro > aUVIRBILI - (003/310 o8B0) 4100 144,401(0 NOT 4Rzou440 0 4010Otirt Mim =Tel . - (419/0mr 08401) OLSOO o,wwsi"OUIEO 100 100 CITY BR0 zs ',1 ,, , 00 x - (04 31406 THIS LOT. O�R y40001 p E-wxr 60004IEM t 04 1. 0 BP 1P rs 1 11 0 0 10 00(100 of m. coi SHOWN HEREON. 0- O%3'suANCI NOT o4113 4(030 -VU0 00301 _ PRrn o 408140 N - 3,,,34)3 00RB-c,c o, ,: i 4 14E0U70700,Exs0. 6544O0 872 0000 - (1 X1/001 o Ri `15 Nxox4 00 00040 ,o 103TMm .0 4x04. a /19 P 000 X600/ x 801) 4 O(R o°A =PB E 4BRHCx1 - ITEMS ABE NOT SURVEY ITEMS AND/OR ARE NOT ADDRESSED BY 11,15 PLAT. EASEMENTS. 055000,80 (000, ";LL 003110 BP� 8 4O1 E ONE („ O01 (0141, H1°En S`e'w LE 1R >ADLISTRATOR. DIE MINILILIII LOWEST 30 ((z) 200 THE 4.40E ,1000 4.010 BVE (s) PEST 5 mLL DEVELOPMENTS. MULD-UNIT RESIDEM144. DEVELOPMENTS M5E(N O7 � E pox a m4) gcli x5 R rvoC WxE�IMER lr cwoorvslrcr Rry BE IFOPWrv. VAIN APPROVING THIS PLAT BY THE NEWS COURT OF BRAZOS COU NTY. IT FARES AND ANY BRIDGES OR CJAVERTS N:Q740t.NntEL" OF ME.- ECESSARY COURT eRAMS 7700.74, sTEFFAT. SAIrCOMUISSIONEMS COURT ASSURES NO ueuLANDN M BUILD ANT OF THE RONTS, OR OMER PUBLIC ITIOROUGHFIMES SHOWN ON TIES PLAT. 1116 PLAT. FLOOD,. DATA IN PARTICULAR. MAY CHANGE. IT 6 RIMIER UNDERSTOOD THE ROADS IN THE SUMMON HAVE FIN. x BEEN mIACCEPTED PROADSMvitrAcca<ii eera4Es'PE CERMICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEGIQATION :Pcr, .,n...i,.. .,M,.,.ale.u.n..xw, .. w M. 4,w. 000 aw...s.>,.w.m STATE DE MIAS COUNTY OE °WM 40004 :7,ab 0: Ue :,1LfFwieF: x,"8.7,..6 20 Notary KOTA (Moms County. Texas CERTIFICATE OF ADMITISTRATOR 04410,3, .,1,. r E1I4„ 4013,. - =7"11.'°•011:1=1" 20 57,0 0x7.0.6a, 0 20 CERMICATE OF CITY ENGINEER N4, 1x4,1,4,;r iii 74°°'-- °-11 a"'.:�.. 4.64,10.3 44,3,x3.., ". G,, .1 Exlw. B",�. CERIMMTE OF THE SURVEYOR APOS 'i T03 l!trt' 4.102 0.,,80' �6 41064., x.. ,3 eeni,y ,mi Wa 4M �oiria ue rrowM 344)4,. CERT, AM OF <GAINEY CLERK E( x P.RTauRE. BESOWBED Eis s,,•E.�",w F4°. 4)404 3141.00•43'.d:i°i0 ,qS .x• 6r sr w .4,0334.14361698 6.6 0. Wellborn WITAng,u ( n�px4vecn 0,2 — Mt.? antw 040 400. 327 00 44.7 IV Awoms of 253.71 (000 mi . HI /2 4,0 IT VERT 45021 oE,�.n two Ux... 040, 32 z.rw.:7 (2s , . n :` anx w x r sa a E.. 4,„347 0 4sx ea 0 o vi i" mIx ,.4,.0 a0. ,1..x0.20 x. 5's≥ 5, VICINITY MAP FINAL PLAT OF WINDING CREEK ESTATES PHASE 5 4.479 ACRES BLOCK 6. LOT 7)0 AND COMMON AREA 3 BEING A REPLAT OF WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 5 BLOCK 6, LOT 71 VOL. 19191, PG. 274 J.C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, A-2(6 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS I LOT OWNEIUDEVELOPER: SURVEYOR: IVELLBORNI MOMO MMIRanebki, RP. No. 65)1 REM, CLC %472.0.765 WETS 7700 6077540 32X033 ENGINEER: PIT STOUTIWtS7P4'WE anwew�,m�i,�ne,6 Kristeen Roe, CTA, PCC Brazos County Tax Assessor/Collector 4151 County Park Ct Bryan TX 77802 979-775-9930 979-775-9938 Fax REFUNDS PENDING 07/23/2024 REQUESTOR BUCEK CHERYL E ADDRESS 372 THIELE RD YOAKUM TX 77995 OWNER NAME MORRIS CLAY & MINDI JANAK PROP ID# 394830 • REFUND AMOUNT $ 95.04 REQUESTOR CASTRO DIANA M ADDRESS 19063 E STATE HIGHWAY 21 OWNER NAME CASTRO DIANA M PROP ID# 21517 REFUND AMOUNT $ 12.57 REQUESTOR MANDUJANO JUAN JR & DELIA L ADDRESS 3707 SHIRLEY DR APT A BRYAN TX 77808 OWNER NAME MANDUJANO JUAN JR & DELTA L PROP ID# 50865 REFUND AMOUNT $ 547.55 REQUESTOR LERETA LLC DBA ACCUMATCH ADDRESS 6191 NORTH STATE HWY 161 SUITE 650 IRVING TX 75038 OWNER NAME THE OWNERS ASSOC OF ACADEMY CONDOMINIUM INC % TODD CARNES PROP ID# 367529 REFUND AMOUNT $ 339.77 REQUESTOR ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT REQUESTOR ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT REQUESTOR ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT REQUESTOR. ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Name Brazos County Tax Office 4151 County Park Court Bryan, Texas 77802 Ph. 979-775-9930 Collecting Tax for: (taxing entities) • Brazos County, City of Bryan, City of College Station •Bryan ISD, College Station ISD, F1, F2, F3, F4, City of Kurten,•Navasotal ISD OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS MORRIS CLAY & MIND1 JANAK 131 HAHN RD • YOAKUM TX 77995-5146 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Legal: OAK CREEK MHC, SPACE 138 OAK.LEAF, SER# FLE240TX1536058A, HUD# PFS1147014 Address: 138 OAK LEAF (PVT) , Account# 394830 TAX PAYMENT INFORMATION Name of Taxing Unit Tax Year of Refund ZREFUND 2023 Taxpayer's reason for refund: OP -Overpayment REFUND TO: BUCEK CHERYL E 372 THIELE RD YOAKUM TX 77995 Payment Date Amount Field 01/31/2024 $996.00 Refund Amount Requested $95.04 Sign below and return form to the Brazos County Tax Office. • "i hereby apply for the refund of the above -described taxes and certify that the information on this form is true and correct." 1/10/-1 —13duttelc-- Signature D(r43--OZD�D • Phone# -063—Dif Cif 'e '°?s&o` Email Address If you make a false statement on this application, you could be found guilty of a Class A misdemeanor or a state jail felony under Texas Penal Code Section 37.10. TAX REFUND DETERMINATION Thettax-coitnd is I II Authorized Officer Signature [ I Disapproved Date Authorized Officer of taxing unit for refund applications over amount required under Section 31.11 Tax Code Authorized Officer Signature Date TAX RECEIPT 02/12/2024 04:12PM KRISTEEN ROE, CTA PH# (979) 775-9930 BRAZOS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR 4151 COUNTY PARK CT BRYAN, TX 77802 PAID BY: BUCEK CHERYL E 372 THIELE RD YOAKUM, TX 77995 R_ eceipt Number'_. 3343489 Date-Posted,2': 01/31%2024 Pay(nentType"., : I _ . Payment OvedRefund Total Paid .;, _ sess.00 Property 1D Geo •_ _ Legal Acres 394830 702019 0000-0614 0.0000 - Legal Description _ OAK CREEK MH_ C, SPACE 138 OAK LEAF, SER# FLE240TX153605BA, HUD# PFS1147014 Situs ..... _� ._ ... -- DBA:Name — Y 138 OAK LEAF (PVT) , Entity' . _ Z REFUND ENTITY EMG SVCS DIST #1 COLLEGE STATION ISD BRAZOS COUNTY Year ._ Rate' 2023 0.00000 2023 0.02071 2023 0.96220 2023 0.40970 _ , ,'Owner Keene. and Address .••••• MORRIS CLAY & MINDI JANAK 131 HAHN;RD YOAKUM, IIX 77995-5146 Taicatile Value Stmt # _ • V_oid_ Original Tax .Des_ cuts .: P&I : 'Aft Fees 0 149004 N 95.04 0.00 ; 0.00 0.00 64,696 91961 N 13.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 64;696 91961 N 64,696 91961 N 622.50 0.00 265.06 0.00 Overage Amount Pei 0.00 96.04 0.00 13.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 622.50 • 0.00 0.00 0.00 265.06 996.00 Balance Due As Of 0113112024: -95.04 Tender Details -.p! Check .3188 - Operator Batch - temerson 49935 (02H2/2o24 LE)` Page: 1 Amount' 996.00 996.00 -. — - i Total• Paid -996.00 Receipt issued In Accordance with Section 31.075 of the Texas Property Tax Code TNBANemzGatine Phone # -APPLICATION FOR -TAX REFUND Collecting Office Name Brazos County Tax Office 4151 County Park Court Bryan, Texas 77802 Ph. 979-775-9930 . Collecting Tax for: (taxing entities) Brazos County, City of Bryan, City of College Station Bryan ISD, College Station ISD, F1, F2, F3, F4, City of Kurten, Navasota ISD OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS CASTRO DIANA M 19063 E STATE HIGHWAY 21 BRYAN TX 77808-9752 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Legal: CASTLE HEIGHTS, BLOCK 19, LOT 4, SER# TX14763435OD TITLE # 93021117 Address: 1510 DOUGLAS ST , Account # 21517 TAX PAYMENT INFORMATION Name of Taxing Unit Tax Year of Refund ZREFUND _ 2023 Taxpayer's reason for refund: OP -Overpayment REFUND TO: FA,19 A O -CASTRO DIANA M 19063 E STATE HIGHWAY 21 BRYAN TX 77808-9752 Payment Date Amount Paid Refund Amount Requested . 07/01/2024 $230.00 I $12.57 Sign below and return form to the Brazos County Tax Office. "I hereby apply for the refund of the above -described taxes and certify that the information on this form is true and correct." 2i pate tO 9A, Email Address If you make a false statement on this application, you could be found guilty of a Class A misdemeanor or a state jail felony under Texas Penal Code Section 37.10. TAX REFUND DETERMINATION Authorized Officer Signature 11!3()I,g-t-t- Date Authorized Officer of taxing unit for refund applications over amount required under Section 31.11 Tax Code Authorized Officer Signature Date TAX RECEIPT 07/03/2024 10:08AM KRISTEEN ROE, CTA PH# (979) 775-9930 BRAZOS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR 4151 COUNTY PARK CT BRYAN, TX 77802 . PAID BY: CASTRO DIANA M 19063 E STATE HIGHWAY 21 BRYAN, TX 77808-9752 .i;; Recefptd,Nurnber ;:; ' j 3362206 IYate;i sted .: - 06/3012024• payment Type , _ P Fayrrier�fCodea=,, Over/Refund 40t�I Pfd * $230.00 J Prope[ty;ID . Geo `-• ' 4 • 21517 '184000-0019.0040 0.0000 ��ai e'g'aI Acres.. I Legal Description` CASTLE HEIGHTS, BLOCK 19, LOT 4, SER# TX147634350D TITLE # 9302111-7 Situs; - . DBA Name • 1510 DOUGLAS ST , G'Entity- . Z REFUND ENTITY BRAZOS COUNTY CITY OF BRYAN ' Year Rate Taxable Value; Stmt # 2023 0.00000 0 149258 2023 0.40970 18,290 24333 2023 0.62400 18;290 24333 ,. '•t •�0wijer NaitleaandAddress:: ; � ,..I CASTRO DIANA M -I 19063 E STATE HIGHWAY 21 BRYAN, TX 177808-9752 -Void: . Original: Tax: Dlscnts •-"• IP&I: 4tt?Fees, ,..Overage •An unt Pd( N 12.57 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 12.57 N 74.94 0.00 11.24 0.00 0.00 N 114.13 0.00 17.12 0.00 0.00 86,18 131.25 230.00 Balance Due As Of 06130/2024: -12.57 Tender Details ' , Credit Card CC XX-2027 Conv.C'harge 0.00 Desctiption '' =r: " ` Amounts 2 23030.00.00 • 72:: a :� *• lemerson 52116 (JETPAYC07032024 LE) 230.00 Page: 1 Receipt issued In Accordance with Section 31.075 of the Texas Property Tax Code Tan warnamn.ht. APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Name Brazos County Tax Office 4151 County Park Court Bryan, Texas 77802 Ph. 979-775-9930 Collecting Tax for: (taxing: entities) Brazos County, City of Bryan, City of College Station Bryan ISD, College Statioh ISD, F1, F2, F3, F4, City of Kurten, Navasota LSD. OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS MANDUJANO JUAN JR & DELIA L 3707 SHIRLEY DR APT A BRYAN TX 77808-0990 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Legal: WOODVILLE ACRES PH 3, BLOCK 5, LOT 18-A Address: 3707 SHIRLEY DR A, Account # 50865 TAX PAYMENT IN FORMATION Name of Taxing Unit Tax Year of Refund Payment Date Amount Paid ZREFUND 2023 02/16/2024 $547.55 Taxpayer's reason for refund: OP -Overpayment REFUND TO: MANDUJANO JUAN JR & DELIA L 3707 SHIRLEY DR APT A BRYAN TX 77808-0990 Refund Amount Requested $547.55 Sign below and return form to the Brazos County Tax Office. "1 hereby apply for the refund of the above -described taxes and certify that the information on this form is true and correct." S'ignatu're +1(47922422'11 Phone # n7H cv94 • p to ❑Irriandulannfffirgmail nnm Email Address if you make a false statement on this application, you could be found guilty of a Class A misdemeanor or a state jail felony under Texas Penal Code Section 37.10. - TAX REFUND DETERMINATION I Vj Appr Authorized I ' icer Signature sapproved -11 30 pate Authorized Officer of taxing unit for refund applications over amount required under Section 31.11 Tax Code Authorized Officer Signature Date I TAX RECEIPT 02/16/2024 03:41 PM `` KRISTEEN ROE, CTA PH# (979) 775-9930 BRAZOS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR 4151 COUNTY PARK CT BRYAN, TX 77802 PAID BY: MANDUJANO JUAN JR & DELIA L 3707 SHIRLEY DR APT A BRYAN, TX 77808-0990 • Receipt Number 3344546 Date• Posted.. ' 02/1_5/2024: Payment Type _ PI Payment Code Over/Refund! T.taIP.atd, ; ' I $547.55' l _Property ID' Geo • Legal Ages ' 1 Owner.Name�and Address • . i 50865 '681000-0305-0180 10.0000 - - I ▪ I MANDUJANO JUAN JR & DELIA L • ; 3707 SHIRLEY DR Legal Description ! APTA •WOODVILLEACRES PH 3. BLOCK 5, LOT 18-A _ BRYAN, TX 77808-0990 I Situs : DBA Name ,� i -3707 SHIRLEY DRA, ;. Entity - Year Rate Taxable Value Stmt # _ Void ., Original Tax Discnts P&I Att Fees .Oyerage Amount Pd Z REFUND ENTITY 2023 0.00000 0 149037 N 547.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 547.55 547.55 Balance Due As Of 02/16/2024: -547.55 Tender _ Details - _ _ :, . - "Description ti i _; .• Amountj, Check 4275 i 647.55 547.55 .C Operator"Batch, • • • tmoore 50042 (02/18/2024TM) ' , TotalTotal Paid1 L I 547.55' Page: 1 Receipt Issued in Accordance with Section 31.075 of the Texas Property Tax Code nuiMEttent . APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Name Brazos County Tax Office 4151 County Park Court Bryan, Texas 77802 Ph. 979-775-9930 Collecting Tax for: (taxi lg entitles) Brazos County, City of Bryan, City of College Station Bryan ISO, College Station ISO, Fl, F2, F3, F4, City of Kurten, Navasota ISD OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS THE OWNERS ASSOC OF ACADEMY CONDOMINIUM INC % TODD CARNES 404 UNIVERSITY DR EAST SUITE B COLLEGE STATION TX 77840.1743 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Legal: ACADEMY CONDOMINIUMS, LOT COMMON AREAS, BLDG 13 & CA Address: 1326 PRAIRIE DR , Account# 367529 TAX PAYMENT INFORMATION Name of Taxing Unit Tax Year of Refund 2REFUND 2023 Taxpayer's reason for refund: PAYMENT IN ERROR REFUND TO: LERETA LLC DBA ACCUMATCH 6191 NORTH STATE HWY 161 SUITE 650 IRVING, TX 75038 Payment Date Amount Paid 01/03/2024 $339.77 Refund Amount Requested $339.77 Sign . - a return form to the Brazos County Tax Office. "I Sigi►atu.._ � � q/�9 alp civ Phone r the refun f the above -described taxes and certify that the informatioi on this form is true and correct." "7 -1( -g -q Fur ZC .1rf?? @ (trek,. C09 - Email Address If you make a false statement on this application, you could be found guilty of a Class A m sdemeanor or a state jail felony under Texas Penal Code Section 37.10. TAX REFUND DETERMINATION Th Is Authorized Officer Signature Disapproved 91 c (tLl- Date Authorized Officer of taxing unit for refund applications over amount required under Sectiop 31.11 Tax Code Authorized Officer Signature Date TAX RECEIPT 07/2312024 12:45PM KRISTEEN ROE, CTA PH# (979) 775-9930 BRAZOS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR 4151 COUNTY PARK CT BRYAN, TX 77802 PAID BY: LERETA LLC DBA ACCUMATCH 6191 NORTH STATE HWY 161 SUITE 650 IRVING, TX 75038 I_ ' '� Receipt_Nu_m_b_er _ Y 332039.8 Date Posted 12/31/2023 Payment Type P Payment Code Full yYotal Pald _ $339.77 Property ID = Geo Legal Acres 367529 101200-0101-0000 0.0000 Legal Description ACADEMY CONDOMINIUMS, LOT COMMON AREAS, BLDG 13 & CA - Situ - _ DBA Name 1326.PRAIRIE DR , ACADEMY CONDOS-- - Owner Name.aannd,Address7-1 THE OWNERS ASSOC OF ACADEMY COND % CARNES 404 UNIVERSITY DR EAST SUITE B • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840-1743 Entity Year Rate Taxable Value Strait Void_ Original Tax DlScnts . P&I ' Att Fees ,Overage• AmouritPdj - " 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 70.21 CITY OF BRYAN 2023 0.82400 17,135 130595 N 106.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 106.92 BRYAN ISD 2023 0.94920 17,135 130595 N 162.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 162.64 339.77 BRAZOS COUNTY 2023 0.40970 17,135 130595 N 70.21 0.00 Balance Due As 011213112023: .00 Operator Batch - -� -_ ._. — ---__. -- -- -----•----- ! _ ._ _� —_---- Total Paid: lemerson 49215 (01032024__LE) 339.77. Page: 1 Receipt Issued in Accordance with Section 31.075 of the Texas Property Tax Code , TaeAulmutl 'Jne. BRAZOS.COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENT(S) FOR THE 2023-2024 BUDGET YEAR NO.23/24 41.01- 41.04 On this the 30th day of July 2024 at a regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court, the following members were present: , A. Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding B. Steve Aldrich, Commissioner, Precinct 1 C. Chuck Konderla, Commissioner, Precinct 2 D. Nancy Berry, Commissioner, Precinct 3 E. Wanda Watson, Commissioner, Precinct 4 F. Karen McQueen, County Clerk The following proceedings were held: THAT WHEREAS, on 30th day of July 2024 the Court heard and approved a budget amendment(s) for the 2023-2024 budget year for Brazos County, Texas; and WHEREAS, expenditure is necessary due to the necessity to meet unusual and unforeseen conditions which could not be reasonably included in the original budget adopted 19 September 2023, the following amendment(s) to the original budget are hereby authorized, as described on the att ched page(s). ADOPTED AND APPROVED this the 30th day of July 2024. THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. By: Duane Peters, County Judge Original: County Clerk's Office and Attached to the original budget BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23/24 - 41.01 7/30/2024 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE General Fund Contingency Contingency Expenditure 2,130.00 General Fund 272nd District Court - Administration Supplies and Other Charges I Expenditure 2,130.00 General Fund Reallocation of funds to the correct account to cover upcoming conferences and travel expense-fr_thg remainder ofcY 2024. A LDate____ - -- SAM; 7/24/2024i I3dl County Judge Approval______ _ _ _ Date • For Oracle Entry Only ' FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ' ACCOUNT NAME 01000 11001500 61130000 (2,I30.00) 01000 22100100 61110000 1,000.00 01000 22100100 61801000 1,130.00 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23/24 - 41.02 7/30/2024 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY I INCREASE DECREASE General Fund Contingency Contingency Expenditure _ 172,381.00 General Fund Facility Services - Non Capital Contractual Services Expenditure 172,381.00 General Fund Reallocation of funds to correct account for the Tax Office and AgriLife Site drainage improvements. (CIF Sti g P � #24-619) rt-"`""N, Foreaw a iiir iib)<IL ��*�'� � C x ��d �w'�,�,�en tir ran �, . .. ` w ; u dq : Maki, m., m,. 7 a7 e:i .a,i _ a. r 4ir� wa. Ya r:,a ,„ , . a., ., rn'� .0 r a �..=m.�.�.. iG �Ji �0NR ,., ..,.A am..�n ....: FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget I ACCOUNT NAME 01000 11001500 61130000 (172,381.00) 01000 17000006 71206000 172,381.00 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23/24 - 41.03 7/30/2024 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE General Fund Contingency Contingency Expenditure 8,200.00 General Fund Purchasing Administration - Non Capital Contractual Services Expenditure 8,200.00 General Fund Reallocation of funds to correct account for the removal and disposal of asbestos containing g. ( #24-611) e mat tats at ormISDI Cour ty' Judge^Approval+ ;; xr tfate 5. r....t 'k >Kor„OracleaEnEryxOrily ..��. ,,.'J!T" J A J Y'C N. �t�� ....,,2w.� ..v. 3 9" �! { Jd k'� .� R5,'d i 'r �.�,a. -�� � .:� !�. i2w ^^ ]p, T t kA R � nr c, �r��:� 'd' S py� -^: . �a�f: � PD 9 [ A k �;�' �3'',':�� FUND DIV ACCT Change In Budget I ACCOUNT NAME 01000 11001500 61130000 (8,200.00) 01000 16500006 71025000 8,200.00 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23/24 - 41.04 7/30/2024 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE General Fund Sheriffs Office - Administration Benefits Expenditure 158,450.00 General Fund Sheriffs Office - Administration Salary and Wages Expenditure 158,450.00 I General Fund Reallocation of funds to correct account for over budget by the end of the fiscal year due to overtime/comp time par1511rthicipz the fiscal year. r'()racle""_ .,_ )r7ntryiOnly: �r , , � s°� :D'I'. _u s� x , ...,_... m s , • FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget !ACCOUNT NAME 01000 28000100 53300000 (158,450.00) 01000 28000100 51940000 158,450.00 1 I I I I Personnel Change of Status ( Jul 25, 2024) Commissioners' Court Date: Department Submitting Information: Purpose of Submissions: Employment 0730-2024 Human Resources Consider and Take. Action on Change Department Name a Employee Name , District Attorney - Crime Fund - Administration Escorza, Maribel Tax Assessor - Collector - Administration Garcia, Natalie Information Technology - Administration Neuman Guerrero, Ernesto Information Technology - Administration Olivarez, Jason Sheriff Office - Jail Administration _ Richards, Dwayne • : :Sheriff Office - Jail Administration . Sanchez, Mario • District Clerk Records Management Fund Silva -Gonzalez, Itzury Separations Department Name Employee Name Road & Bridge - Administration Cedillo, Joe Juvenile Services - Detention Elliott, Lester Juvenile•Services - Detention Miles, Trevion Tax Assessor - Collector - Administration Mora, Jackeiyne- • Personnel Action Forms Department Name • Employee Name' Juvenile Services - Detention Mathis, Kelvin Jr. Juvenile Services - Detention Mosley; Lakeydra Juvenile Services - Detention Taylor, Rydarius . Juvenile Services - Detention - Westbrook, Dmitri Tax Assessor Collector Ramos Salgado, Carmen Approved in Commissioners' Court: 07-30-24 County Judge's or Commissioner's Signature: