The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2024/02/06 REGULAR SESSION 10:00 AMFILED FOR RECO ® Z Dar x -z�2oz C'CLOCK ®M ' KAREf�I_MCQUEEN BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN,TEXAS NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION ON FEBRUARY 6, 2024 AT 10:00 AM IN THE COMMISSIONERS COURTROOM OF THE BRAZOS COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 200 S. TEXAS AVENUE, SUITE 106, BRYAN, TX 77803, THE PUBLIC MAY WATCH THE MEETING LIVE AT FACE BOOK.COM/BRAZOS000NTYTX 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance • U.S. and Texas Flag - Commissioner Aldrich 2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns Consider and take action on agenda items: 3 -19 3. Proclamations 24-002 through 24-010 recognizing the following outstanding citizens for their significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum and this community. • a. Ginger Carribine • b. Mike Carribine • c. Elizabeth Cunha • d. Naveen Cunha • e. Max Gerall • f. Earnest Jefferson • g. Blake Jennings • h. Joyce Newton • i. Effie Perry 4. Approval of Resolution 24-006 to participate in Texas Range Local Government Investment Pool and designating Cristian Villarreal and Jamie Cartwright as the Authorized Contacts. 5. Approval of hours and locations for the May 4, 2024 Central Appraisal District Board Election. 6. Acceptance of donated or unclaimed property left by inmates leaving the Brazos County Detention Center for the months of November and December 2023. 7. Approval of the following invoices from StaplesAdvantages.com. The invoices were not paid in full in 2023 due to credits received and will need to be paid with 2024 funds. • a. Invoice #7614038711-0-1 • b. Invoice #7614038711-2-2 8. Approval of Change Order #3 to Cl P #23-580 Old Reliance Rd - Phase 1 for additional labor and materials in the amount of $130,029.00, increasing the total amount of the contract to $4,753,288.78. 9. Award of RFP #23-600-1 Bond Engineering "Design Services for Inner Loop East, SH 6 North of Bryan to William D Fitch. Recommended Award to Quiddity Engineering, LLC in the amount of $11,201,952.00. 10. Permission to Advertise Cl P #24-611 Demolition and Removal Services for Multiple County Buildings. 11. Approval of CI P #24-615 proposal for Brazos County Expo Complex Facility Assessment with VLK Architects for $41,000.00. 12. Consider and take action to close, vacate and abandon a portion of Washington Street (100' right of way) and 20-foot alleyways located between Blocks 85 and 101 of the town of Millican. Roadway and alleyways were never built and there is no public interest served by retaining the original right of way. Site is located in Precinct 1. 13. Tax Refund Applications for the following: Overpayments • a. Highway 30 Partnership - $827.52 • b. Amarillo National Bank - $1,788.66 Payment in Error • c. Rodney Carlton & Sara Lee Hunter - $3,394.26 14. Commissioners Court minutes for the following dates: • a. January 2, 2024 - Regular Meeting • b. January 9, 2024 - Regular Meeting • c. January 17, 2024 - Emergency Meeting • d. January 23, 2024 - Regular Meeting • e. January 30, 2024 - Regular Meeting 15. Budget Amendments. • FY23/24 Budget Amendments 18.01 -18.06 16. Personnel Change of Status. • a. Personnel Action Forms • b. Employment & Separations 17. Payment of Claims. 18. Convene into Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code §551.087 for deliberation regarding economic development negotiations. 19. Consider and possible action on Executive Session. 20. Acknowledgement of FY 2023-2024 Budget to Actuals by Fund as of January 31, 2024. Acknowledgement of FY 2023-2024 Contingency Budget to Actuals by Fund as of January 31, 2024. 21. Acknowledgement of the FY 2023 Racial Profiling Report for Brazos County Constable Precinct 2. 22. Acknowledgement of the FY 2023 Racial Profiling Report for Brazos County Constable Precinct 3. 23. Juvenile director's report on detention population. 24. Sheriff's report on inmate population. 25. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics. 26. Adjourn. -N PUBLIC COMMENTS Public Comment during the Commission Meeting may be for all matters, both on and off the agenda, and be limited to four minutes per person. Persons are invited to submit comments in writing on the agenda items and/or attend and make comment at the Commission meeting. Members of the public are reminded that the Brazos County Commissioners Court is a Constitutional Court, with both judicial and legislative powers, created, under Article V, Section 1 and Section 18 of the Texas Constitution. As a Constitutional Court, the Brazos County Commissioners Court also possesses the power to issue a Contempt of Court Citation under Section 81.024 of the Texas Local Government Code. Accordingly, members of the public in attendance at any Regular, Special and/or Emergency meeting of the Court shall conduct themselves with proper respect and decorum in speaking to, and/or addressing the Court; in participating in public discussions before the Court; and in all actions in the presence of the Court. Those members of the public who are inappropriately attired and/or who do not conduct themselves in an orderly and appropriate manner will be ordered to leave the meeting. Refusal to abide by the Court's. Order and/or continued disruption of the meeting may result in a Contempt of Court Citation. It is not the intention of the Brazos County Commissioners Court to provide a public forum for the demeaning of any individual or group. Neither is it the intention of the Court to allow a member (or members) of the public to insult the honesty and/or integrity of the Court, as a body, or any member or members of the Court, or County employees, individually or collectively. Accordingly, profane, insulting or threatening language directed toward the Court and/or any person in the Court's presence and/or racial, ethnic or gender slurs or epithets will not be tolerated. Violation of these rules may result in the following sanctions: 1. cancellation of a speaker's time; 2. removal from the Commissioners Court; 3. a Contempt Citation; and/or 4. such other and/or criminal sanctions as may be authorized under the Constitution, Statutes and Codes of the State of Texas. The County Commissioners Court can deliberate or take action only if a matter has been listed on an agenda properly posted prior to the meeting. During the public comment period, speakers may address matters not listed on the published agenda. The Open Meeting Law does not expressly prohibit responses to public comments by the Commissioners Court. However, responses from the County Judge or Commissioners to unlisted public comment topics could become deliberation on a matter without notice to the public. To ensure the public has notice of all matters the Commissioners Court will consider, the County Judge and/or Commissioners may choose not to respond to public comments, except to correct factual inaccuracies, recite existing policy in response to an inquiry or to ask that a matter be listed on a future agenda. See Texas Open Meetings Act Section 551.042. INVOCATION Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Court meeting shall be to and for the benefit of the Court. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Court and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Court in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Court. The Commissioners Courtroom of the Brazos County Administration Building, 200 S. Texas Avenue, Suite 106, Bryan, TX77803, THE PUBLIC MAY WATCH THE MEETING LIVE AT FACEBOOK.COWBRAZOSCOUNTYTX is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made two working days before the meeting. To make arrangements, please call (979) 361-4102. The foregoing minutes of the Commissioners Court Meeting field February 6, 2024, have been examined and are approved in open Court this 5th day of March 2024, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas. Duane Peters County Judge Steve Aldrich Commissioner, Precinct 1 buck Konderla Nancy Be Commissioner, Precinct 2 Wanda J. Wa Yn Commissioner, Precinct 4 Attest: Karen McQueen County Clerk Commissioner, Precinct 3 MINUTES FEBRUARY 6, 2024 BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT REGULAR MEETING A regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court of Brazos County, Texas was held in the Brazos County Commissioners Courtroom in the Administration Building, 200 South Texas Avenue, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas, beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, February 6, 2024 with the following members of the Court present: Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding; Steve Aldrich, Commissioner of Precinct 1; Chuck Konderla, Commissioner of Precinct 2; Nancy Berry, Commissioner of Precinct 3; Wanda J. Watson, Commissioner of Precinct 4; Karen McQueen, County Clerk. The attached sheets contain the names of the citizens and officials that were in attendance. 1. .Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance • U.S. and Texas Flag - Commissioner Aid rich 2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns There was no citizen's input. Consider and take action on agenda items: 3 -19 3. Proclamations 24-002 through 24-010 recognizing the following outstanding citizens for their significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum and this community. • a. Ginger Carribine • b. Mike Carribine • c. Elizabeth Cunha • d. Naveen Cunha • e. Max Gerall • f. Earnest Jefferson • g. Blake Jennings • h. Joyce Newton • i. Effie Perry The Court voted unanimously to adopt Proclamations 24-002 through 24-010 and commends the outstanding citizens for their significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum and this community. A copy of the proclamations is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 4. Approval of Resolution 24-006 to participate in Texas Range Local Government Investment Pool and designating Cristian Villarreal and Jamie Cartwright as the Authorized Contacts. The Court voted unanimously to adopt Resolution 24-006 of the Texas Range Local Government Investment Pool and designating Cristian Villarreal and Jamie Cartwright as the authorized contacts. A copy of the resolution is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Steve Aldrich, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 5. Approval of hours and locations for the, May 4, 2024 Central Appraisal District Board Election. A copy of the approved hours and locations of the Central Appraisal District Board Election is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 6. Acceptance of donated or unclaimed property left by inmates leaving the Brazos County Detention Center for the months of November and December 2023. A copy of the donation forms is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 7. Approval of the following invoices from StaplesAdvantages.com. The invoices were not paid in full in 2023 due to credits received and will need to be paid with 2024 funds. • a. Invoice #7614038711-0-1 • b. Invoice #7614038711-2-2 Motion: Approve., Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 8. Approval of Change Order #3 to CI P #23-580 Old Reliance Rd - Phase 1 for additional labor and materials in the amount of $130,029.00, increasing the total amount of the contract to $4,753,288.78. A copy of the change order is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Chuck Konderla, Seconded by Commissioner Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 9. Award of RFP #23-600-1 Bond Engineering Design Services for Inner Loop East, SH 6 North of Bryan to William D Fitch. Recommended Award to Quiddity Engineering, LLC in the amount of $11,201,952.00. Jody Quimby requested more information on this project and how the award was determined. Mr. Quimby also requested an update on the budget for the entire project and the scope of the project. He said he understands this part is only one section of the whole project. Judge Peters confirmed the Transportation Bond was passed in November of 2023 and the project was disclosed within the bond information. Purchasing Agent Charles Wendt spoke to the award of RFP #23-600-1. He explained that for this project they did not go out for bids, but according to Government Code 22.54 Professional Services Act a committee evaluated the vendors and determined Quiddity Engineering, LLC was the best firm for this project. Mr. Quimby stated this is just one portion of the I nner Loop East project and asked if more information on the project could be given. Judge Peters explained that this portion of the project must take place before it goes to TxDOT. Commissioner Aid rich commented that transportation and infrastructure projects take months and even years to complete. Chief of Staff Ed Bull cautioned that the discussions were leading out of the scope of the agenda item. Cathie Viens spoke next. She stated she did not recall the Transportation Bond on the ballot and asked which item it was. Judge Peters confirmed this was on the November 2023 ballot and the bond information was advertised prior to the election. Mrs. Viens then asked for the wording that was on the ballot regarding the Transportation Bond. Judge Peters cautioned this was out of the scope of the agenda item but again noted the funding on this project is coming from the Transportation Bond that passed in November 2023. Commissioner Aldrich requested an update on projects from ITS. Mr. Wendt stated this is the final contract for the bonds that were sold to date, but there could potentially be more projects with the additional bond funds. Mr. Wendt said the engineering firms and ITS would be happy to provide an update to the Court. The Court voted. unanimously to accept the recommendation of the Evaluation Committee and awarded RFP #23-600-1 to Quiddity Engineering, LLC. A copy of the tabulation sheet and contract is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Steve Aldrich, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 10. Permission to Advertise CI P #24-611 Demolition and Removal Services for Multiple County Buildings, Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Wanda J. Watson. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 11. Approval of CI P #24-615 proposal for Brazos County Expo Complex Facility Assessment with VLK Architects for $41,000.00. A copy is attached. Motion Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 12. Consider and take action to close, vacate and abandon a portion of Washington Street (100' right of way) and 20-foot alleyways located between Blocks 85 and 101 of the town of Millican. Roadway and alleyways were never built and there is no public interest served by retaining the original right of way.. Site is located in Precinct 1. A copy of the Order Vacating Road is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Steve Aldrich, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 13. Tax Refund Applications for the following: Overpayments • a. Highway 30 Partnership - $827.52 • b. Amarillo National Bank - $1,788.66 Payment in Error • c. Rodney Carlton & Sara Lee Hunter - $3,394.26 Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 14. Commissioners Court minutes for the following dates: • a. January 2, 2024 Regular Meeting • b. January 9, 2024 - Regular Meeting • c. January 17, 2024 - Emergency Meeting • d. January 23, 2024 - Regular Meeting • e. January 30, 2024 - Regular Meeting Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 15. Budget Amendments. • FY 23/24 Budget Amendments 18.01 -18.06 18.01 Reallocation of General Permanent Improvement Funds. 18.02 Transfer of funds from Contingency Fund to Juvenile Court Referee. 18.03 Reallocation of 2020 Certificates of Obligation Funds. 18.04 Reallocation of General Permanent Improvement Funds. 18.05 Reallocation of On System Road Bond Funds. 18.06 Reallocation of General Permanent Improvement Funds. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 16. Personnel Change of Status. • a. Personnel Action Forms • b. Employment & Separations A copy of the Personnel Change of Status is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Chuck.Konderla. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Konderla, Peters, Watson. 17. Payment of Claims. Claims 8200668 - 8200783 9200238 - 9200295 18. Convene into Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code §551.087 for deliberation regarding economic development negotiations. The County Judge stated the Court would consider items 20 through 25 then return to convene into Executive Session. Having considered the previously noted agenda items, at 10:35 a.m. the County Judge stated that the Court would convene into Executive Session as stated above. The following individuals were asked to attend the meetings: Cheryl Coffman, Executive Assistant Ed Bull, Chief of Staff Allison Lindblade, Assistant General Counsel Nina Payne, Budget Officer Katie Conner, County Auditor Kimberly Roach, Intergovernmental Liaison 19. Consider and possible action on Executive Session. At 11:11 a.m. the County Judge announced the meeting open to the public and stated that no action would be taken on the Closed Executive Session. 20. Acknowledgement of FY 2023-2024 Budget to Actuals by Fund as of January 31, 2024. Acknowledgement of FY 2023-2024 Contingency Budget to Actuals by Fund as of January 31, 2024. The Court acknowledged receipt of the FY 2023-2024 Budget to Actuals by Fund as of January 31, 2024 and of the FY 2023-2024 Contingency Budget to Actuals by Fund as of January 31, 2024. 21. Acknowledgement of the FY 2023 Racial Profiling Report for Brazos County Constable Precinct 2. The Court acknowledged receipt of the FY 2023 Racial Profiling Report for Brazos County Constable Precinct 2. 22. Acknowledgement of the FY 2023 Racial Profiling Report for Brazos County Constable Precinct 3. The Court acknowledged receipt of the FY 2023 Racial Profiling Report for Brazos County Constable Precinct 3. 23. Juvenile director's report on detention population. Juvenile Director Linda Ricketson reported there are 39 juveniles in the detention center, 29 are male and 10 are female, and 31 have electronic monitors. 24. Sheriff's report on inmate population. Sheriff Wayne Dicky stated there were 736 inmates in jail, 623 inmates are male, 113 are female and 42 have electronic monitors. 25. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics. Commissioner Konderla commended the Brazos County First Responders Association on their Chili Cook Off event. He said it was a great fund raiser and encouraged everyone to attend next year. Commissioner Aid rich added that the steak and silent auction were also outstanding. Commissioner Watson stated she would also like commend Felicia Benford and Arthur Davila for the wonderful work they did to set up the warming center. Commissioner Watson said she would like to meet with Emergency Management to discuss the issues around the warming center. Commissioner Watson also offered her condolences for the loss of McLennan County Commissioner Patricia Chisolm Miller. She said that Commissioner Miller was very kind to her as a new commissioner and holds the honor of being one of only six African American female commissioners in Texas. Commissioner Aldrich announced that a Candidate Forum for House District 12 and 14 candidates will be held tonight at 6:00 p.m. at Legends Event Center. Commissioner Konderla also reminded everyone that the local Candidates Forum is being held at the Brazos Center on February 12, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. 26. Adjourn. Pg I of 4 BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT DAY OF /o �©0 A Name (PLEASE PRINT) S 1 , Organization (PLEASE PRINT) & a" kce �� (-,ZOn 2 TI � � Pg a of BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT DAY OF mob-uc-rcA 20 QLH Name l A -T L"Vdc, sfc� Kam, A v\dR* s 7:3 r d6 Lari.k«. Organization (PLEASE PRINT) N IA c1 A ,e fi cb �6 S LA Pg 3 of q Name (PLEASE PRINT) BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT DAY OF a , 20 a�A /PM, Organization (PLEASE PRINT) ('0, -�vpcc-- -rfP.61-s - 9 � 5 Pbf- �t 6 Pg 4 of tf BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT DAY OF 10 ' oD WT Name (PLEASE PRINT) 20 ;�(-( M, Organization (PLEASE PRINT) c4d.i fy �n . V�mfri PROCLAMATION Honoring Gi er Carridilw In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American rational Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum -Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and -Whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and -Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races, creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and -Whereas The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Ginger Carribine in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6t ay of Februa 024, in Bryan, an, Brazos County, Texas._ C - I- - -"L _ Duane Peters, County Judge Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct 1 Commissio Nancy Berry Precinct 3 Commissioner Chuck Kond Precinct 2 qCZom2 r anda J. Watson Precinct 4 PROCLAMATION Honoring Mike Carribine In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum 'Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and -Whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and 'Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and -Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races, creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and 'Whereas The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Mike Carribine in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6th dayaf February 2024, in Brya�Brazosouty, Texas. v uane Peters, County udge Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct I Comm issione ancy Berry Precinct 3 Commissioner Chuck Konderla Precinct 2 Commiss o er Wanda J. Watson Precinct 4 PROCLAMATION Honoring Eltzad eth Cunha In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum -Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and -Whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and -Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and -Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races, creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and -Whereas The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. - Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Elizabeth Cunha in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6th day , Februar ,2024, i Bryan, Brazos unty, Texas. Duane Peters, Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct 1 Commissi r ancy Berry Precinct 3 Judge Commissioner Chuck Konderla Precinct Commissio el Wanda J. Watson Precinct PROCLAMATION Honoring Naveen Cunha In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum 'Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and -Whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races, creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and WhereaS The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Naveen Cunha in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6th dy-ol-Febr`uary,2024, in B ,� n, Brazos Cou i , , Texas. _ Duane Peters, CountyJilge Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct 1 Commission& Nancy Berry Precinct 3 Commissioner Chuck Konderla Pre inct 2 Commiss oner Wanda J. Watson Preci et 4 PROCLAMATION Honoring Max Geraff In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum 'Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and -whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and . 'Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and 'Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races, creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and "whereas The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Max Gerall in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6th day of February 2024, iri,Bryan, Brazos' ounty, Texas. Duane Peters, County Judge Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct 1 Commission& Nancy Berry - Precinct 3 Commissioner Chuck Konderla Precinct 2 7-- Commissibne� Wanda J. Watson Precinct-4 PROCLAMATION Honoring Earnest Jefferson In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum -Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum . are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and -Whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and -Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and -Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races, creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and -Whereas The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Earnest Jefferson in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6th da _of-&ebruary 2024,`i(�Bryan, Brazo ounty, Texas. Duane Peters, Coun y Judge Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct 1 Commis ner Nancy Berry Precinct 3 Co missioner Chuck Konderla r Precinct 2 Commiss o er Wanda J. Watson Pred c 4 PROCLAMATION Honoring Blake ,kennings In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum -Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and -Whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and -Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and -Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races, creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and -Whereas The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Blake Jennings in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley Africap-Aniericca\n Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6th day of --February 2( 024, in Bryan, Brazos \! ounty, Texas. / Duane Peters, County Judge Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct I Commissiolor Nancy Berry Precinct 3 Commissioner Chuck Konderla Precinct 2 u 1,t Commissyyon Wanda J. Watson Precinct I PROCLAMATION Honoring , Joyce Newton In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum -Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and —Whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and -Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races, creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and -Whereas The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Joyce Newton in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African -American Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6th day -of ebruory 2024, in Bryan, Brazos�10 unty, Texas. V Duane Peters, County Judge Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct 1 Commissiong Nancy Berry Precinct 3 Commissioner Chuck Kond I Precinct 2 i Commissioner Oda J. Watson Precinct 4 PROCLAMATION Honoring Pff e Perry In Appreciation of Significant Contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) Brazos Valley African American Museum Whereas The African American National Historical Society and the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum are pleased to recognize outstanding citizens who have made significant contributions to the Brazos Valley African American Museum and to this community; and Whereas The African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley African American Museum was dedicated and celebrated its grand opening on July 22, 2006 thanks in large part to the efforts, contributions and prayers of these outstanding citizens; and -Whereas The Museum's membership started with over 50 citizens upon the grand opening of its doors; and Whereas The Museum continues to welcome new members of all races. creeds and ethnicities who have an appreciation for the wealth of diversity in the Brazos Valley now and throughout its history; and Whereas The Museum showcases through art exhibits the works of talented local artists and offers educational enrichment programs to the general public. Now, Therefore, Be It Proclaimed that the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby recognize Effie Perry in appreciation of significant contributions to the African American National Heritage Society (dba) the Brazos Valley Afpican-Ame� rican Museum in Bryan, Texas. Proclaimed this 6th dayTof-February 2024, �f�n,Bryar��Brazazo�sC.ou�, Texas. Duane Peters, County Judge Commissioner Steve Aldrich Commissioner Chuck Kond Precinct 1 Commissioner'Nancy Berry Precinct 3 Precinct 2 f Commissioi�e Wanda J. Watson Precinct Model Resolution or Ordinance: Participation Agreement Authorizing Participation in Texas Range EREAs Brazos County ("Participant") is a local government of the State of Texas and is !red to delegate to a public funds investment pool the authority to invest funds and to act as custodian of investments ad with local investment funds; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Participant to invest local funds in investments that provide for the preservation and safety of principal, liquidity, and yield consistent with the Public Funds Investment Act; and WHEREAS, the Texas Range, a public funds investment pool, was created on behalf of entities whose investment objectives in order' of priority are preservation and safety of principal, liquidity, and yield consistent with the Public Funds Investment Act. IOW THEREFORE, be it resolved as follows:. A. That Participant shall enter into a Participation Agreement to establish an account in its name in Texas Range, for the purpose 1 of transmitting local funds for investment in Texas Range. B. The Participant shall designate one or more individuals to act as "Authorized Contacts" of the Participant, in the manner j provided in the form attached to this Participation Agreement, to transmit funds for investment in the pool and to withdraw 1 funds from the pool from time to time, to issue letters of instruction, and take such other actions deemed necessary or appropriate for the investment of local funds. C. That this Resolution and its authorization shall continue in full force and effect until amended or revoked by the Participant, and until Texas Range receives a copy of any such amendment or revocation. i This Resolution is hereby introduced and adopted by the Participant at its regular/special meeting held on the 6 day of i February is 2O 24 . OF PARI BY: signature aignazure -0 1JE P� TErzs Printed Name County Judge Title NO��' � . Stabe off TOe:rsN,s CoNtuna. ID 131g9g3518, m27 K AR-15-0 M C, GUC EN Printed Name County Clerk Title i DEPARTMENT: DATE OF COURT MEETING: I ITEM: I TO: DATE: FISCAL IMPACT: BUDGETED: DOLLAR AMOUNT: IV. Eleclion_Schedde_- 4th.pdE BRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN, TEXAS NUMBER: 2/6/2024 Approve the hours and locations for the May 4, 2024 Central Appraisal District Board Election. Commissioners Court 02/01 /2024 False False $0.00 pescri to ion Ixp-e- 2024 E.V. Election Schedule - May 4th Backup Material �ZR to Duane Peters Date County Judge 2024 GENERAL ELEcTioN EASY VOTE ScHEDuLE ELECTION DAB`: MAY 49 202-4 (ELECCONGENERAL HoxmO DE LA V6TAa6,vADELANTADA DiA DE ELECCI6N: 4 DE AfAY0, 2024) EARLY VOTE: April 22 — April 26, 2024 8:00 am — 5:00 pm Monday — Friday (tunes — Viernes) * April 27, 2024 8:00 am — 5:00 pm Saturday (sdbado) * April 29 —April 30, 2024 7:00 am — 7:00 pm Monday —Tuesday (Lunen —Martes) EARLY VOTE SITES: (SITTOS DE Y,OTAa6,vADEL4NTADA) Brazos County Election Administrator Office (McLeod Training Rm) — 300 East. Wm. L Bryan Pkwy, Suite 100, Bryan, Texas Arena Hall — 2906 Tabor Rd (Tabor Road & N. Earl Rudder Freeway) Bryan, Texas Galilee Baptist Church — 804 N. Logan, Bryan, Texas College Station Utilities Meeting & Training Facility — 1603 Graham Road, College Station Memorial Student Center (MSC) — Texas A&M University (MSC Bldg. Room L526), College Station, Texas The last day to receive an application for ballot by mail is Tuesday, April 23, 2024 (a, 5:00pm. We can mail applications for the voter to fill out and return to us or the voter can write a letter stating their name, local address, address where they are, reason why they're voting absentee, party preference and it must include the voter's signature. The voter can fax from out of county, mail it to us, or walk in the application. If mailing, send it to: (El fildino dia para recibir una solicitud para una boleta por correo es martes el 23 de abril de 2024 a las 5.00 de la tarde- Podemos mandar formularios al voiante para que los Ilenen y devuelvan o el votante puede escribir inta carta con su nombre, direcci6n local, la direcci6n donde est4 la raz6n par su ausencia, preferencia de partido, y hay aue incluir la firma del votante. El votante puede enviarnos un fax desde fuera del condado, enviarlo por correo o presentar la solicitud sin cita previa. si es por correo enviar a_) Brazos County Elections Administrator Office 3 00 E. Wm. L Bryan Pkwy, Ste: 100 Bryan, TX 77803 979-361-5770 — Phone 979-361-5779 —Fax t BRQC CENTER :• s ' _..: :..INMATE. PROPERTY:II .��i VENTORY-FORK: Int'aate�I,eft- aclityi:ll%27/2923 ;'..;::I:_..Mail.lD:337274 ..' . ' : ;__.! ..: ... :. `S4#:gM9 ;,::.' jhis is to advise you, Mthi olson,`Bronterra'Janae arse that the Brains: Couhti-oifice.of the Sheriff Hnll: :.- �--':-: •-.:° ....:.:.::g. y ....-: ,Fe+' . ; ..,• ,. ; (... • : ':.:..� g•days)'to Have anyone of.youi choice •pickup and%r ieceivk :•,;:..'::' : • ' grant 'nit a • qd of dridweek five wofkm " " ' �, ' "an and all o e that you have'accumulated 'dufl ; ' ..y .... .. W P nl► y ..; .. , . ng your time' Mcarcecated in the .Brazos.Coun ' ;' .. E?etention:Center. • In the event that.06 one has picked ;up yougroperty after `the expiration' of o .;; ;.week (five.:working days); any and all property will 6:e' o a to._the Brazos County SherifYs {Nfice an = disposed-.of.to the persons) 'or organisation of:c, nice by �the.order of •tlie.Sheriff of Brazos.Cauiit ; �...: ' i'exas. Your, rd : • It • : p perty.will not be released to any a other tt:an the person thi : you have designate '::• t to;pick k up and can be'pictced up fribi i the',Rel ase Lobby.of the 1jrazos.County t)etentiog Centers fi __- located at 1835 Sandy Point Rd..Bryan, TX 718 To avoid Idbk wait times please schedule th j pickon 24-hours in advance. ; A. .:..: OF' T OF PE RTY ... ....... .. AT ;. Inmate Signature. ► : 'Date „ •� : ��. : • cer re: : ` ..: • ° • '::. Offi ignatu .•Dat 23 • e.11%27/29 .: Person Designated To Plck Up Property: . - .:.-...::. 1 ,.:. Address: i.� • EPA :...... . i Phone# •` ........ -:: . Receiver's Stgnatu.re:.:. Date' :. Irrdude Co ....Oft - ,( O Releasing Officers signatere: :. . m t tiff .01:9 t -- -- - ------ RN! .. . ..... . .. .... t adviseJANE'ANNA the* Brazos . . .... ....... .. ...... . . .. . . . ........_.....,....p....e. . . r-..-p ..- --- ----- -one ... w..e...e..k. !.(..P..V....6.. w.....6..rk.i ... .. ......Ao'hav--e -a--n--y-q-n---9---:-o--fi:.your choice pickup and/or... receive ------- . ...:..... .......... ou.,.nave,-.accu Ifica ............. . event ;thAt.fid:'JdfteAAk ......... ' ''d . . . * ---------- - pro ....... .... . . .. . AyanOSII.Otd0d,it' . All. be.,ddftit6d.-fd.the:.Bra �_Orb a.n k6ti o--n--..-of-:choice:-.- .. 6yt.e....order: of't r er.60 1t be released'td-OnVbfii`dth6fth ..the piers ed.00.RdM'.thti:RLil6�iii.Lobb,v6f:thi:.Bi-azdi .... ........ . .... ... ... .. .... � ...... . .... . r: RRAZOS COUNTY DETENTION -CENTER BRAZOS COUNT1Y.:D'ETENTION.:CENTER Ton TO ........ ... . ......... ....... .... .... . .... .... - ---- - - ------ 6RAZOS :CAUNTY.'DETENTIOU-CEWTER WoMprollih, BRAZOS COUNTY DETENTION .CENTER BRAZ®S'C- OUNTY DETENTION -CENTER BRAZOS COUNTT DETENTION.* CENTER BRAZOS -COUNTY DETENTION CENTER BRAZQS::COUNTY:DETE.NTION.: CENTER BRAZOS:COUNTY:.DETENTION CENTER ., . • ,•:. .....:..:....: •.. • :...... • .. • ..:--..;.:, . �:.- :::.....::-• ::: •:•.:..... __ ::•._:.-N-':: • :•:- ._ `.•_:: -:-: ;.� :• : ,' ...:::-. - ...., ...:::•....• � ..: • BRAZOS000IVTY:�DETENTI, • .. EN:TER .... _ :INMATE:.PROPERTY..INVENTORY.FRM::.:: .:.: ... Dab0hMAe Left Facnf ty. l..! • '.:..JORID.344199: :: SO#:142234 °; :',:This is.to;advise:you; Taylor,.Shedric. De*ayne.ahat the: Brazos.County.Office:of.the:$heriff.will_grant you it •:. a•period bf.bne°week (five working days] to have anyone of.youe chore pickup and/or receive an0r!d ......... . ,all,property_that:you haue:accurnuiated:during:your.Vnie incarcerated in t}ie„Brazos•Caunty.Dete,ntion : .. Center lri the event =that. no one has picked up your;property after the expiratcon of one *§0 (five :.. . ... working days}, any and.allprop" will b'e' dor}ated to the Brazos County Sheriff's Offic ..... disposed'of :•to the_ persons) or orgamzat- fi of-tho ce by the:order of the'.Sheriff of Brazos'_Couniy; Teicas::..Your. ........ ro a will not be released tb an one other than the•:pers6h'.that ou have des ated !o; ` ick it u and cart;tie:picked up from'tiie.Release Lobby -of th6:Brazds Couroty getentioii Ceiiter•locateil'at1835` Sandy �aik: Rd. Bryan; TX 77807 ':.To:avoid tone wait times 'iilease schedule the 'picku'a' 24' hours in .......... . .;advance..::'-:`:::::: ....:::.... . ......... . CHANGE ORDER #3 Date of Issuance: 1/24/2024 Owner: Brazos County Road & Bridge Contractor: Gulf Coast Project: Old Reliance Phase 1 Reconstruction The Contract is modified as follows upon,execution of this Change Order. Description: Crushed concrete rip rap at culvert crossings. Owner's Contract No.: CIP #23.580 Engineer's Project No: 619012 . • S.�.I t: .NR.,:.. ......�.. }..: ,. `e...t,l'.i :. ...ti:y ::•.:.;:•:::tY"i:^'•�i•'�i:pi:r.,::lia :.:::,� :}1.i •, ii,i �•i:::.i.. :•`.�., +.h,..-:e..:..,4:,..i ..�.,...ty^':.; :;:.. :..+:: •...t•F�. l• ,.1....}, ....�:,..: ' �.t...,_.,:.....,.., . scCiptl.Q.n•.,i,., r., I:w•.:,.. ��.:-�, ,:.�..�..�•,,:�..�:�:':•r~}<,,..,.,,S.,ps i;,.a..,.�:..�:ai.;:.,�;:;,,;:�•t.:;� .Y':.. ..�vi�S. �;.Qu 't". >gti. t.Y,a•, \ • '.':Y .4•. :,�.;;� ItlitJnit��; :• tiiUYt• ,,., f� •� ��9Id"P �e<ss :S• N� : :=n`w,Y:: ��:�r�iii :.A?!Yji1l•:�:. .. �:_:....;�'�ota1.�- 315 4" Slope Paving -60 SY $g5.00 .$4,750.00 316 24" Rook Rip Rap -250 CY $155.00 ,$38,750.00 315 4" Slope Paving 765 SY $95.00 $72,675.00 426 (New) 18" Crushed Concrete Rip Rap 602 CY 1 $135.00 1 $81,270.00 427 (New) ITraffic Control 1 LS $19,584.00 $19,584.00 :rY�.U.wtaY.rsM. .i::.,::,sz:., » :_..a... :......... _ 1K Ar�. :aivµ4u,=r.:r.•.e�_" .'F:i;�.i 'd. F .�1�.'`�n t �' I CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE CHANGE IN CONTRACT ITEMS FOR OLD RELIANCE Original Contract Price: Original Contract Times:180 days $4,486,799AO Substantial Completion: December 2.2023 Ready for Final Payment January 1, 2024 Change from previously approved Change Order No.1 to No. 2: Change from previously approved Change Orders N-oi to 136 460.38 61 days Substantial Completion: Februaly 1, 2024 Readv for Final Payment: March2 2024 Contract Price prior to this Change order: Contract Times prior to this Change Order: 61 days $4,623,259.78 Substantial Completion: February 1, 2024 Ready for Final Payment: March 2.2024 C ange o N C ange Order: Increase of this Change Order: Additional Days: 24 days 130 029 00 ' Substantial Completion: February 25, 2024 Ready for Final Payment March 26 2024 Contractor Price incorporating this Change Order: Contract Times with all approved Change Orders: $4,753,288.70 Substantial Completion: February 25, 2024 Ready for Final Payment: March 26 2024 AP P OVED: ACC By: By: Mn� Co ractor (Authorized Signature) Owner (Authorized Si nature) _ Title: a VLLt. -r 7t LA �0(ot Title: Date: a Date: Z � RECOMMENDED, Date: 01/20024 By: Title: Pro iect anager Texas M " atarlaIsT Inc.. -23990.'S�te Hwy 6 South Navasota, Texas 77868 Phone:, '936'825.0118' Deceniber 8,2023 ;. Mr. Fred Paine. Operations Manager Brazos County Road & Oridge .2617 Hwy 21 W Bryan, Texas 77803 County: Brazos Highway.: -Old Reliance Road Projecit: Old Reliance- Road Reconstruction Phase I Job 61.9012 Re: LTIO 008 —187 Rock. Rip Rap.& 4"'Sloped.Paving .De,qr,W. Paine, -'T�C:A FT-7 ■ A CRH COMPANY 8elow is our pricing for the additibnal quantity of.4" slope paving and the additional quantity .of r6ol" rip rap utilizing .crushed concrete at an -embedment of 18" in lieu of 24" embedment. Item Number l Desert ption hire Unit] Quantity Total Price 315 41' Slo Payin $95.0.0 SY -50.00 $ 31*6- 24" Rock.kip Rap $155.00 CY 450.00 $ 38;M.0 '315 4" Slope Paying $95.00 :SY 7.65.00 $. 74675.00 'New 18" Crushed Concrete.Rip Rap CY 602.00 $ 85,484.00 '10.1 Tmffie Control $19,584.00 LS 1.00 $ 19,594..00 14ei flange $ 134,243.60 Days Requestedl 24.00 T!tas-e.feviqw_at your earliest..don.venience"and.l.et-us know if you have any questions or 'concerns. Sincerely. Mike Lackey Project MAnaget- r0i i From: Mason Kwtattrowskt To: 'Atibri Cotton Subject- M': WM RE: Braaos County - Old4elianceRoad-Phase 1- LTO 008 -Rip Rap_ Pricing hare: Tuesday,.January 23.- 2024 9:47:48 AM Mason Kwiatkowski, P.E. A79-776-9700- . t gistexas orn eutDOWUX-ffM Muca-WMM6Fs LnrmscAM-SUMEYM eu�murerirari•,ns�:wam•saaEseEac. NOTICE: -This email message and any files transmitted may include legally -privileged andlor confidential information; and is .intended solely -for the use.of the individual(s) named as recipient(s). If you are not -the -named recipient you should Trot disseminate, distribute, copy,.'or. alter this email but notify the sender 'immediately. Thank you. From: Lackey,'Michael (Texas Materials - Gulf Coast•Area)<niichael.lackey@texasrnaterials.com> .Sent: Thursday, January'S1; 2024 4:04,PM -To: Fred A- Paine <FPaine.@brazoscountyb(.gov>; Lewis.. kyle (Texas Materials - Gulf Coast Area) - (Oewis@texasmaterials.com> Cc: Mason kwiatkowski <mkwiatkowski@glstexas.com>- Subject: RE: [ExTj RE: Brazos County - Ol-d Reliance Road Phase-1 - LTO 008 - Rip Rap. Pricing Fred; I;got-with Kyle and we can knockoff artofher=$7 per-CY,.so the price would be $135.00 per CY; Please'let us know how you would like to proceed. Regards, Mike Lackey Project Manager Gulf Coast:Area — Navasota Texas Materials A CRH COMPANY 23990 State Hwy 6 S Navasota,. TX 77.868 O (9* 825 Oflb C (903)-931 3222 E michael.lackeyPg texasmaterfals.com From: Fred -A. Paine <FPaine[a brazdscountvtx.dov> —RFP-fi-CIP-23-580-Old-Reliance-Road-Phase i-Reconstruction Max Points Available Cost Including the contingency and addenda F Points for Costj 30 letion Time Points for Time 3 Past performance on similar projects of size and 4 Overall experience of Project Manager & Superii 5 Resource availability Technical Proposal Total 15 20 20 15 100 Norman Construction Services Texas Materials Group, Inc. dba Gulf Coast a CRH Company LarryYoung Paving, Inc. Knife River Corp. - South Brazos Paving, Inc. Texcon General Contractors $4,692,305.50 $4,486,799.40 $4,760,416.00 $4,420,535.84 $4,851,281.90 $4,455,797.83 28.26 29.56 27.86 30.00 27.34 29.76 180 180 175 195 330 220 14.58 14.58 15.00 13.46 7.95 11.93 15 20 19 18 18 16 16 19 19 19 17 16 10 15 15 14 15 13 84 1 98 1 96 1 95 1 85 1 86 Committee Recommended Award: Texas Materials Group, Ifdba-GutfCoassttt a CRH Company Approved by Corn `issb ees ou ih s J l �1� 1—�— 2023 by holding the position of ry c AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY AND ENGINEER THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. THIS AGREEMENT is made on the day of rW , 2024, Between the COUNTY: BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS c/o Brazos County Commissioners Court Attention: County Judge 200 S. Texas Ave. Suite 332 Bryan, Texas 77803 and the ENGINEER: QUIDDITY ENGINEERING LLC Attention: Doug Bramwell, PE, RPLS 150 Venture Drive, Suite 100 College Station, Texas 77845 for the following PROJECT: Professional Engineering and Surveying Services for development of an alienment studv. desien schematic, environmental documents, and studies in sunnort of the schematic work, public involvement, permit procurement, data collection and analysis, drainage, conceptual traffic control: traffic SLojections. traffic engineeringand operations including capacity analysis, traffic simulations. safety analysis, and 3-1) modeling, limited surveying and mapping, utility engineering investieation. and limited utility coordination for Inner Loop Phase 1 (New Location) from SH 6 North of Bryan to W.D. Fitch in Brazos County, Texas. in an AMOUNT not to exceed: $ 11,201,952.00 The COUNTY and ENGINEER agree as set forth below. ARTICLE I ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITY 1.1 ENGINEER'S SERVICE 1.1.1 The ENGINEER'S services consist of those services performed by the ENGINEER, ENGINEER'S employees and the ENGINEER'S consultants as enumerated in Articles 2 and 3 of this Agreement. 1.1.2 The ENGINEER'S services shall be performed as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work. The ENGINEER shall submit for the COUNTY'S approval a schedule for the performance of the ENGINEER'S services which may be adjusted as the Project proceeds and shall include allowances for periods of time required for the COUNTY'S review and for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. Time limits established by this schedule approved by the COUNTY shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the ENGINEER or the COUNTY. ARTICLE H SCOPE OF ENGINEER'S BASIC SERVICES 2.1 DEFINITION 2.1.1 The ENGINEER'S Basic Services consist of those described in attached Exhibit "A' and incorporated by_ reference hereto — SCOPE OF BASIC SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY QUIDDITY ENGINEERING LLC . TO BRAZOS COUNTY. ARTICLE III ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.1 GENERAL 3.1.1 The services described in attached Exhibit "B" as Additional Services are not included in the Basic Services. It is expressly understood and agreed that ENGINEER shall not furnish any of the additional services without the prior written authorization of the COUNTY or the COUNTY'S designee. The COUNTY shall have no obligation to pay for such additional services, which have been performed without the prior written authorization of the COUNTY as herein above provided.' 3.1.2 Services which could possibly be required, but. at the time of this Agreement were yet to be determined and which are not included in the Basic Services or Additional Services as identified and described in EXHIBIT "A' and EXHIBIT "B," respectively, shall be considered Contingent Additional Services. A list of possible Contingent Additional Services that could be needed as the Project proceeds is included at the end of Exhibit `B." It is expressly understood and agreed that the ENGINEER shall not furnish any of the Contingent Additional Services without the prior written authorization of the COUNTY or the COUNTY'S designee. The COUNTY shall have no obligation to pay for such Contingent Additional Services, which have been performed without the prior written authorization of the COUNTY as herein above provided. ARTICLE IV COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY 4.1 The COUNTY' shall provide full information regarding requirements for the Project, including a program, which shall set forth the COUNTY's objective, schedules, constraints, and criteria. 4.2 The COUNTY shall establish and update an overall budget for the Project, including the Construction Cost, the COUNTY'S other costs and reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. 4.3 ' The COUNTY shall designate a representative authorized to act on the COUNTY'S behalf with respect to the Project. The COUNTY, or such authorized representative, shall render decisions in a timely manner pertaining to documents submitted by the ENGINEER in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the ENGINEER'S service. 4.4 The COUNTY shall give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER if the COUNTY becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project or non-conformance with the contract documents. Any delay by the COUNTY in providing said notice shall not constitute a waiver, a bar or act to estop the COUNTY from exercising any of its rights under this contract. 4.5 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents presented by the ENGINEER, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as the COUNTY deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of the ENGINEER. 4.6 The proposed language of certificates or certifications requested of the ENGINEER or the ENGINEER'S consultants shall be submitted to the ENGINEER for review and approval at least 14 days prior to execution. The COUNTY shall not request certifications that would require knowledge or services beyond the scope of this Agreement. 4.7 The COUNTY shall also provide those specific items identified in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by reference hereto —ITEMS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY TO THE ENGINEER. ARTICLE V CONSTRUCTION COST 5.1 DEFINITION 5.1.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the COUNTY of all elements of the Project designed or specified by the ENGINEER. 5.1.2 The Construction Cost shall include the cost at current market rates of labor and materials furnished by the COUNTY and equipment designed, specified, selected or specially provided by the ENGINEER, plus a reasonable allowance for the Contractor's overhead and profit. In addition, a reasonable allowance for contingencies shall be included for market conditions at the time of bidding and for changes in the work during construction. 5.1.3 Construction Cost does not include the compensation of the ENGINEER and the ENGINEER'S consultants, the costs of the land, right-of-way, financing or other costs which are the responsibility of the COUNTY. 5.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS 5.2.1 Evaluations of the COUNTY'S Project budget, preliminary estimates of Construction Cost and detailed estimates of Construction Cost, if any, prepared by the ENGINEER, represent the ENGINEER'S best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that neither the ENGINEER nor the COUNTY has control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor's methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, the ENGINEER cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the COUNTY'S Project budget or from any estimate of Construction Cost or evaluation prepared or agreed to by the ENGINEER. ARTICLE VI USE OF ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS 6.1 The COUNTY shall be the absolute and unqualified owner of all drawings, preliminary layouts, record drawings, sketches and other documents prepared pursuant to this Agreement by the ENGINEER with the same force and effect as if the COUNTY prepared same. Copies of complete or partially completed mylar reproducible, preliminary layouts, record drawings, sketches and other documents prepared pursuant to this Agreement shall be delivered to the COUNTY when and if this Agreement is terminated or upon completion of this Agreement, whichever occurs first. The ENGINEER may retain one set of reproducible copies of the documents and these copies shall be for the ENGINEER'S sole use in preparation of studies or reports for the COUNTY. The ENGINEER is expressly prohibited from selling, licensing, or otherwise marketing or donating these documents, or using the documents in preparation of other work for any other client, without the prior express written permission of the COUNTY. 6.2 All documents including reports, drawings and specifications prepared by the ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the COUNTY or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. ,Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by the ENGINEER for the specific purposes intended will be at the COUNTY'S sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to the ENGINEER. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle the ENGINEER to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by the COUNTY and the ENGINEER. 6.3 Submission or distribution of documents to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the ENGINEER'S reserved rights. ARTICLE VII TERMINATION, SUSPENSION, OR ABANDONMENT 7.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon not less than fourteen (14) days written notice should the other party fail to substantially perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. 7.2 If the COUNTY suspends the Project for more than thirty (30) consecutive days, the ENGINEER shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension. 7.3 This Agreement may be terminated by the COUNTY upon not less than fourteen (14) days written notice to the ENGINEER in the event that the Project is permanently abandoned. If the COUNTY abandons the Project for more than ninety (90) consecutive days, the ENGINEER may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice. 7.4 If the COUNTY fails to give prompt written authorization to proceed with any phase of services after completion of the immediately preceding phase, the ENGINEER may, after giving seven (7) days written notice to the COUNTY, suspend services under this Agreement. 7.5 Failure of the COUNTY to make payments to the ENGINEER in accordance with this Agreement shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination. 7.6 If the COUNTY fails to make payment when due to the ENGINEER for services and expenses, the ENGINEER may, upon seven (7) days written notice to the COUNTY, suspend performance of services under this Agreement. Unless the ENGINEER receives payment in full within seven (7) days of the date of the notice, the suspension shall take effect without further notice. In the event of a suspension of services, the ENGINEER shall have no liability to the COUNTY for delay or damage caused by the COUNTY because of suspension of services. 7.7 In the event of termination that is not the fault of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination, together with Reimbursable Expenses, if any, then due. ARTICLE VM MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 8.1 Unless otherwise provided, this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the COUNTY. Venue for any dispute or disagreement regarding the terms of this Agreement shall be in Brazos County, Texas. 8.2 Causes of action between the parties to this Agreement pertaining to acts or failures to act shall be deemed to have -accrued and the applicable statutes -of limitation shall commence to run not later than either the date of Substantial Completion, or the date of issuance of the final Certificate for Payment for acts or failures to act occurring after Substantial Completion. 8.3 The COUNTY and the ENGINEER, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representative of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the COUNTY nor the ENGINEER shall assign this Agreement without the express written consent of the other party. 8.4 This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between the COUNTY and the ENGINEER and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the COUNTY and the ENGINEER. 8.5 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the COUNTY or the ENGINEER. 8.6 Unless otherwise provided for in this Agreement, the ENGINEER and the ENGINEER'S consultants have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to, hazardous materials in any form at the Project site, including but not limited to asbestos, asbestos products, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) or other toxic substances. 8.7 'The ENGINEER shall have the right to include representations of the design of the Project, including photographs, among the ENGINEER'S promotional professional materials. The ENGINEER'S materials shall not include the COUNTY'S confidential or proprietary information, if the COUNTY has previously advised the ENGINEER in writing of the specific information considered by the COUNTY to be confidential or proprietary. 8.8 COMPLIANCE AND STANDARDS. The ENGINEER agrees to perform the work hereunder in accordance with generally accepted standards applicable thereto, and shall use that degree of care and skill commensurate with the engineering profession to comply with all applicable state, federal and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the work to be performed hereunder and the ENGINEER'S performance. 8.9 SURVEYING SERVICES: In accordance with the Professional Land Surveying Practices Act of 1989, the COUNTY is informed that any complaints about surveying services may be forwarded to the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveying, 7701 North Lamar, Suite 400, Austin, Texas 78752, (512) 452-9427. 8.10 INDEMNIFICATION: ENGINEER shall save and hold harmless the COUNTY from and against any and all claims and liability due to activities of the ENGINEER, its agents or employees, performed under this Agreement and which result from any negligent act, error, or omission of the ENGINEER, or of any person employed by the ENGINEER. The ENGINEER shall also save harmless the COUNTY from and against any and all expenses, including attorney's fees which might be incurred by the COUNTY in litigation, or otherwise, resisting said claims or liabilities. which might be imposed on the COUNTY as the result of such activities by the ENGINEER, its agents or employees. .. ARTICLE IX PAYMENTS TO THE ENGINEER 9.1 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF BASIC SERVICES 9.1.1 Upon approval by the COUNTY, or the COUNTY'S designee, payment for Basic Services shall be made monthly and shall be in proportion to services performed that month within each phase of service. 9.2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES 9.2.1 Upon approval by the COUNTY or the COUNTY'S designee of the ENGINEER'S statement of services rendered or expenses incurred, payment on account of the ENGINEER'S Additional Services and for Reimbursable Expenses shall be made monthly. 9.3 PAYMENTS WITIiHELD 9.3.1. No deductions shall be made from the ENGINEER'S compensation on account of penalty, liquidated damages or other sums withheld from payments to Contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the work other than those for which the ENGINEER has been found to be liable. 9.4 ENGINEER'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 9.4.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses pertaining to Additional Services and services performed on an hourly basis shall be available to the COUNTY or the COUNTY' S authorized representative at mutually convenient times. 9.5 LIMIT OF APPROPRIATION 9.5.1 Prior to the execution of this Agreement, the ENGINEER has been advised by the COUNTY and the ENGINEER fully understand and agrees, such understanding and agreement being of the absolute essence to this Agreement, that the total maximum compensation that ENGINEER may become entitled to hereunder, and the total maximum sum that the COUNTY shall become liable to pay to the ENGINEER hereunder, shall not, under any conditions, circumstances or interpretations hereof, exceed the sum certified as available by the County Auditor in the Auditor's Certificate attached hereto. ARTICLE X BASIS OF COMPENSATION The COUNTY shall compensate the ENGINEER from funds obtained through the Transportation Road Improvement Program Initiative or current revenue of Brazos County as follows: 10.1 BASIC COMPENSATION 10.1.1 For Basic Services, as described in Article 2, Basic Compensation shall be computed as follows: In accordance with the attached Exhibit "C" incorporated by reference hereto, SCHEDULE OF FEES. 10.2 • COMPENSATION FOR •ADDITIONAL SERVICES 10.2.1 For Additional Services of the ENGINEER, as described in Article 3, compensation shall be computed as follows: In accordance with the attached Exhibit "C" incorporated by reference hereto, SCHEDULE OF FEES. 10.3 COMPENSATION FOR CONTINGENT ADDITIONAL SERVICES 10.3.1 For Contingent Additional Services of the ENGINEER, as described in Article 3, compensation shall be computed as follows: In accordance with the attached Exhibit "C" incorporated by reference hereto, SCHEDULE OF FEES. 10.3.2 Payments shall be made by the COUNTY in accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 2251. The COUNTY shall pay the ENGINEER'S statement as approved by the COUNTY's designee within thirty (30) days after the COUNTY'S designee's approval of the same, provided that the approval or payment of any such statement shall not be considered to be evidence of performance by the ENGINEER to the point indicated by such statement or of receipt or acceptance by the COUNTY of the work covered by such statement. ARTICLE XI OTHER CONDITIONS OR SERVICES 11.1 INSURANCE 11.1.1 The ENGINEER shall file with the COUNTY a Certificate of Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance having minimum limits of One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence and annual One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) aggregate. Such Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance shall have a deductible not in excess of Two Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($200,000.00) self -insured. Such Certificate shall bear the endorsement "Not to be canceled without thirty (30) days prior notice to BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS." The ENGINEER shall maintain the Professional Lability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance at all times this Agreement is in effect and for a period of five (5) years after completion of the Project. Failure to maintain the required insurance shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Agreement. The ENGINEER shall also provide Worker's Compensation, automobile and comprehensive general liability policies. The ENGINEER shall deliver the insurance certificates to the COUNTY. The coverage provided herein shall contain an endorsement providing thirty (30) days notice to the COUNTY prior to any cancellation of coverage. Said coverage shall be written by an insurer acceptable to the COUNTY and shall be in a form acceptable to the COUNTY. If the ENGINEER has canceled or allowed to lapse any of these insurance policies then the COUNTY may pay for such insurance and may hold the amount of such payment out of the ENGINEER's fees or be otherwise reimbursed. Failure to maintain the required insurance shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Agreement. 11.2 PERIODS OF SERVICE 11.2.1 The ENGINEER shall begin work immediately upon receipt of the Notice -to -Proceed in writing by the COUNTY or the COUNTY's designee. The project will proceed according to the schedule shown in Exhibit "A." The schedule makes certain assumptions regarding review processes and other activities that are beyond the control of the ENGINEER. 11.2.2 Working days shall be defined as standard workdays between Monday and Friday, exclusive of national holidays. 11.2.3 This schedule assumes an orderly progression of the ENGINEER'S services. Delays beyond the control of the ENGINEER may be cause for extension of this period of service, in which case the ENGINEER shall submit in writing to the COUNTY its request for such extensions a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days prior to the end of the affected service period. 11.2.4 If the COUNTY has requested significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project, the time or performance of the ENGINEER'S services shall be adjusted equitably. 11.3 PROJECT MANAGER COMMITMENT 11.3.1 The COUNTY expects the ENGINEER to commit its PROJECT MANAGER and TASK LEADERS, as proposed in the RFQ, for the duration of the contract. The COUNTY further expects the PROJECT MANAGER's commitment to the contract to include commitment as PROJECT MANAGER for each work authorization without further delegation or substitution over the course of the contract. PROJECT MANAGER replacement on an active contract, while not strictly prohibited, will require the COUNTY's prior consent. 11.3.2 Requirement for Submittal of Request by Provider: When requesting a replacement for a PROJECT MANAGER or TASK LEADER, the ENGINEER must submit a request to the COUNTY with the following information: • Certification that replacement PROJECT MANAGER is employed by the ENGINEER, or certification that the replacement TASK LEADER is employed by the ENGINEER or one of the approved subconsultants. • The name of proposed individual and the reason for the replacement. • Resume of the proposed replacement including, the credentials and experience of the individual. Also include information about their licensures, TxDOT pre -certifications, or other certifications required in the contract. • Resume of the person being replaced. This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above. The undersigned officers and/or agents of the parties hereto are the properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolution extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in force and effect. BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS Duane Peters, County Judge Acting by and through the authority of the Brazos County Commissioners Court Attest: ounty Clerk to Form: (9Eu EP--kt_. C,oL44 9EL AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE QUIDDITY ENGINEERING, LLC by: Kevin Krahn, PE Executive Vice President I hereby certify that funds are available in the amount of $ O �. Z0 I i q 5 Z .yy to accomplish and pay the obligation of Brazos County under this contract. 4- 1frazos County Auditor Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop EXHIBIT A SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE ENGINEER INNER LOOP SH 6 to W.D. FITCH CSJ: TBD Engineer shall provide preliminary engineering services for development of an alignment study, design !matic, environmental documents, and studies in support of the schematic work, public involvement, permit urement, data collection and analysis, drainage, conceptual traffic control, traffic projections, traffic veering and operations including capacity analysis, traffic simulations, safety analysis, and 3-D modeling, ;d' surveying and mapping, utility engineering investigation, and limited utility coordination for Inner Loop ;e 1 (New Location) from SH 6 North of Bryan to W.D. Fitch in Brazos County, Texas. REQUIREMENTS Coordination. The Engineer shall coordinate issues and communications with State and/or County's internal resource areas through the County's Project Manager. The County will communicate the resolution of issues and provide the Engineer direction through the County's Project Manager. The Engineer shall notify the County and coordinate with adjacent engineers on all controls at project interfaces. The Engineer shall document the coordination effort, and each engineer must provide written concurrence regarding the agreed project controls and interfaces. In the event the Engineer and the other adjacent engineers are unable to agree, the Engineer shall meet jointly with the County. and each adjacent engineer to resolve disagreements. If the engineers are unable to resolve an issue with the County as mediator, the County may decide the issue and the decision will be final. The Engineer shall prepare each exhibit necessary for approval by each railroad, utility, and other -governmental or regulatory agency in compliance with -the applicable format and guidelines required by each entity and as approved by the County. The Engineer shall notify the County in writing prior to beginning any work on any outside agency's exhibit. Progress Reporting and Invoicing. The Engineer shall invoice according to function code breakdowns shown in Exhibit A — Services to be Provided by Engineer, of the Contract for Engineering Services and Exhibit C — Fee Schedule, of each work authorization. The Engineer shall submit each invoice in a format acceptable to the County. With each invoice, the Engineer shall include a completed projected vs. actual invoice form. The Engineer shall submit a monthly written progress report to the County's Project Manager regardless of whether the Engineer is invoicing for that month. The Engineer shall complete the services according to the milestone work schedule established in the work authorization. The Engineer shall submit a monthly written progress report to the County indicating the actual work accomplished during the month, scheduled work to be accomplished for the month, the estimated work to be accomplished for the coming month, problems encountered and actions taken to remedy them, list of meetings attended, and overall status. The progress report must use a bar chart diagram to indicate the percentage complete of each task shown on the previous report and the percentage complete of each task. The Engineer is required to meet with the designated County project manager or environmental coordinator on a monthly basis for Page 1 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop progress tracking purposes unless prior written agreement is made with County not to hold a meeting in any given month. The Engineer shall submit minutes of the meeting summarizing the events of the meeting within seven calendar days after each meeting. The Engineer shall prepare a project work schedule, using the latest version of Primavera software or another scheduling program approved by the County in writing. The schedules shall indicate tasks, subtasks, critical dates, milestones, deliverables, and review requirements in a format that depicts the Interdependence of the various items. The work schedule must incorporate an allocation of time for stage reviews of the design schematic and the environmental documents by County personnel. The Engineer shall present the work schedule to the County for review and acceptance and provide assistance in interpreting the proposed work schedule. The Engineer shall provide advance written notice to the County if the Engineer is not able to meet the scheduled milestone review date. Once the project has been completed and accepted by the County, the Engineer shall deliver all electronic files to the County within 30 calendar days of County's written request. Final payment is contingent upon the County's receipt and confirmation by the County's Project Manager that the electronic files can be opened and are usable utilizing the current version of the software in use by the County, and all the review comments have been addressed. The Engineer shall prepare a letter of transmittal to accompany each document submittal to the County. At a minimum, the letter of transmittal must include the TxDOT control -section -job (CSJ) number, the highway number, county, project limits, TxDOT contract number, and TxDOT work authorization number. Traffic Control. The Engineer shall provide all planning, labor, and equipment to develop and to execute each traffic control plan (TCP) needed by the Engineer to perform services under each work authorization. The Engineer shall comply with the requirements of the most recent edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). The Engineer shall submit a copy of each TCP to the County for approval prior commencing any work on any State and/or County roadway. The Engineer shall provide all signs, flags, and safety equipment needed to execute the approved TCP. The Engineer shall notify the State and/or County In writing 24 hours in advance of executing each TCP requiring a lane closure and shall. not •begin •lane• closure without having obtained State and/or County's written approval. The Engineer shall ensure that its field crew possess a copy of the approved TCP on the job site at all times. Upon request by the State and/or County, the field crew must make the TCP available to the State and/or County for inspection. The Engineer shall assign charges for any required traffic control to the applicable function code. Right of Entry. Prior to performing any work outside of the County's right of way, the Engineer shall request right of entry from public and private landowners to allow services (e.g. environmental services, surveying services, geotechnical services) to be performed and shall request concurrence from the County. The Engineer shall prepare right of entry permissions, which must be signed by the landowner. Letters or other materials seeking right of entry must contain explicit reference to the kinds of activities for which right of entry is requested and an indication of the impacts (if any) that will result from performance of these services. The Engineer shall not commit acts which will result in damages to private property and shall make every effort to comply with the wishes and address the concerns of private property owners. Level of Effort. For each -work authorization; the -Engineer shall base the -level of effort at each phase on the prior work developed in earlier phases without unnecessary repetition or re -study. As directed by the County, the Engineer shall provide written justification regarding whether or not additional or Page 2 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop repeated level of effort of earlier completed work is warranted, or if additional detail will be better addressed at a later stage in the project development. 1.6. Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC). The Engineer shall provide peer review at all levels. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall retain evidence of their internal review and mark-up of that deliverable as preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal mark-ups are submitted. If requested by the County's Project Manager, the Engineer shall submit the Engineer's internal mark-up (e.g., red -lines, comments) developed as part of the Engineer's quality control step. When internal mark-ups are requested by the County in advance, the County may reject the actual deliverable if the Engineer fails to provide sufficient evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal mark-up document. The Engineer shall perform QA and QC on all survey procedures, field surveys, data, and products prior to delivery to the County. If, at any time, during the course of reviewing a survey submittal it becomes apparent to the County that the submittal contains errors, omissions, or inconsistencies, the County may cease its review and immediately return the submittal to the Engineer for appropriate action by the Engineer. A submittal returned to the Engineer for this reason is not a submittal for purposes of the submission schedule. 1.7. Underground excavation If necessary, the Engineer shall contact the Texas Excavation Safety System, Inc. (DIGTESS) or call telephone number 811 to have underground utilities marked prior to digging holes for right-of- way monuments, utility engineering investigation, geotechnical investigation, or other purposes. The Engineer shall separately contact utilities not a part of the DIGTESS organization. The Engineer shall maintain documentation of all notification calls. The Engineer shall comply with Texas's excavation laws. 1:8. Preventative Measures to Prevent the Spread of Oak Wilt Disease Contamination The Engineer shall take the following preventive measures while cutting, pruning, or removing oak trees in counties which have confirmed cases of oak wilt disease or when directed by the County: A. When possible, employ. alternative methods instead of pruning -or cutting oak trees. B. When possible, perform necessary pruning and cutting of healthy trees during January or February when sap beetles are least active. C. Treat wounds with pruning paint in oak wilt disease infected counties to discourage insects, especially during warm weather. D. Sterilize all pruning tools between each use on each tree with either Lysol spray or a 70 percent rubbing alcohol solution. E. Dispose of the tree cuttings by burning, burying, or another approved method. 1 I9. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). A. The Engineer shall, and shall require its subcontractors to: 1. Provide personal protective equipment (PPE) to their personnel, 2. Provide business vehicles for their personnel, and 3. Require their personnel to use PPE and drive only business vehicles while performing work on or near roadways. B. The PPE must meet all: 1. Current standards set by Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Page 3 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 2. TxDOT requirements (e.g., safety glasses, Type 3 (TY 3) pants for night work). C. Each business vehicle must be clearly marked with the Engineer's business name, or the name of the appropriate subcontractor, such that the name can be identified from a distance. 1.10. OMITTED. 1.i11. Information Resources and Security Requirements. A Contractor -Related Entity might create, access, transmit, store, or use Public TxDOT data in a Contractor -Related Entity Environment. Contractor shall ensure that Contractor -Related Entity Environments comply with the TxDOT Low Security Baseline. TASK DESCRIPTIONS AND FUNCTION CODES Engineer shall categorize each task performed to correspond with the Function Codes (FC) and Task AND DESIGN STUDIES ie Engineer shall prepare an alignment and proposed roadway schematic layout that includes projected iffic volumes and existing and proposed typical sections. The Engineer shall furnish Microsoft Office and croStation and OpenRoads computer generated media containing the roadway schematic layout to the >unty. All supporting attachments and exhibits must accompany the schematic layout. All MicroStation and )enRoads computer generated files containing the roadway design schematic must be fully compatible with software used by the State without further modification or conversion. ie Engineer shall produce, obtain, review, and evaluate existing and twenty-year projected traffic data for use the preparation of the schematic design layout. The data must be utilized in accordance with the auirements for schematic development and consistent with the policies of the State. ie Engineer shall prepare preliminary drawings to identify any potential impacts and constraints within the eject corridor; including impacts to the nature, cultural, and human -environment. The potential impacts and nstraints identified must include all existing and proposed utilities (both public and private), structures, burial ounds, neighborhood communities, historical landmarks, and undeveloped areas. Any potential utility ,nflicts and structural impediments must be identified as such. The Engineer shall propose alternative gnments that avoid or minimize displacements and damages and prepare any additional attachments or .hibits required to illustrate a preferred alternative alignment. The Engineer shall assist the County with lency meetings during the development of the schematic design as requested by the County. If requested by County, the Engineer shall prepare a Notice and Opportunity to Comment and assist the County with 3keholder meetings, public meetings, and a public hearing, if requested. i itemization of the schematic design and engineering work activity to be performed under this contract is .tailed below. The Engineer shall prepare all designs in accordance with the latest version of: A. Roadway Design Manual, published by TxDOT B. TxDOT Project Development Process Manual, published by TxDOT; C. Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO); D. Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets, and Bridges, published by TxDOT; E. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD), published by TxDOT; Page 4 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop F. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board (TRB); G. Highway Safety Manual (HSM), published by AASHTO; H. Hydraulic Design Manual, published by TxDOT; I. Access Management Manual, published by TxDOT; and J. other State approved manuals .and guides. design criteria are not identified in these manuals, the Engineer shall notify the County and request design schematic horizontal layout must adhere to a design scale of 1 inch = 100 foot. The Engineer shall ;lop the schematic layout, exhibits, and attachments in English units. All Microsoft Office, MicroStation, sole Markup Language (KML), Keyhole Markup Language Zipped (KMZ), and Bentley OpenRoads puter graphic files furnished to the County must be submitted on USB flash drive to the County in their ,e format, which must be fully compatible with the programs currently used by the State. Schematics must Af TxDOT and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards. The schematic must follow TxDOT's puter-aided design and drafting (CADD) standards. The Engineer shall submit the schematic as an original iment, accompanied with an original MicroStation formatted graphics file. Final copies of the schematic gn must be signed and sealed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Texas. 0.1. Schematic Design Work Outline. A. Develop Base Maps The Engineer shall develop the base maps to be used for the analysis and proposed schematic layout from existing construction and right of way (ROW) plans as available. The Engineer shall re-establish the existing centerline horizontal alignments for all roadways, identify existing ROW and easements,, property owners, and the approximate location of major utilities based on a utility engineering investigation in the preparation of base maps. B. Planimetrics and Aerial Mapping The Engineer shall obtain planimetrics, digital terrain modeling (DTM), and aerial photographs from the County, if available. C. Analyze Existing Conditions Using collected data and base maps, the Engineer shall develop an overall analysis of the existing conditions to develop the schematic design. The analysis must include the following: 1. Easement determination Approximately 182 acreage property Title Reports and 110 lot/block properties will be reviewed and entered into a GIS system. The GIS system will be developed and maintained for approximately 24 months during the schematic phase. Horizontal alignment Vertical alignment 2. Pavement cross slopes and pavement type 3. Soil exploration 4. Geotechnical testing 5. Highway -rail grade crossing studies, if applicable 6. Intersection design and analysis 7. Sight distance 8. Large guide signs and roadside signing Page 5 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop ,9. Level of service 10. Safety (i.e., crash data) 11. Locations of critical constraints 12. Drainage 13. Traffic control and construction phasing sequence D. Schematic Alternatives The Engineer shall identify and analyze schematic alternatives to minimize potential adverse operational impacts, crash impacts, ROW impacts, environmental impacts, major utility conflicts, structural impediments, or exceptions to the State and FHWA design criteria. The Engineer will divide the corridor up into sections based on traffic projections, and study • various alignment -alternatives within each section. - The alternatives will be reviewed and refined during team coordination, public involvement, and environmental evaluation to present two alternatives for consideration. Before moving onto the Deliverable Schematic, a Preferred Alternative must be selected and agreed upon by the State and/or the County. E. Deliverable Schematic The Engineer shall evaluate and document the following in the analysis to optimize the design: 1. Efficient use of the allocated ROW 2. Control of access (COA) and driveway locations 3. Roadway and intersection geometry 4. Cross sections 5. Bicycle and pedestrian design -6. Drainage and hydraulic design 7. Stopping sight distance 8. Level of service 9. Safety 10. Traffic and signal operations 11. Construction, ROW, easement, and utility costs 12. Construction sequencing 13. Traffic control during construction 14. Roadside safety appurtenances 15. Large guide signage 16. Environmental mitigation (e.g., noise walls, storm water best management practices (BMPs)) 17. Bridge layouts and required vertical clearance,, showing begin and end bridge stations and location, of interior bents 18. Railroads (if applicable) 19. Interface with existing high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, managed lanes, and park - and -ride facilities 20. Accommodation of ultimate corridor configuration. Page 6 of 45 Exhibit Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 21. Accommodation of future cross street expansion as described in local thoroughfare plan (if applicable) 22. Avoidance of utility lines (if feasible) 23. impact of construction delays from utility relocations F. Project. Management and Coordination 1. The Engineer shall direct and coordinate the various elements and activities associated with developing the design schematic. 2. The Engineer shall prepare the detailed graphic project work schedule indicating tasks, critical dates, milestones, deliverables, and State and/or County review requirements. The project work schedule must depict the order of the various tasks, milestones, and deliverables. The Engineer shall review the schedule monthly and provide updates regarding -its progress on the schedule to the County. •- 3. The Engineer shall submit written monthly progress reports to the County. 4. The Engineer shall provide ongoing quality assurance and quality control to ensure completeness of product and compliance with the County procedures. 5. The Engineer shall conduct site visits in both the AM and PM peak hour and develop a technical report that includes photographs outlining the findings and observations. G. Data Collection The Engineer shall conduct field reconnaissance and collect data as necessary to complete the schematic design. Data must include the following information. Items 1 through 8 must be obtained from the County, if available. Items 9 through 13 must be obtained from other agencies as required. 1. Available corridor major investment studies 2. Design data from record drawings of existing and proposed facilities 3. Existing and future design year traffic data 4. Historical crash data 5. Roadway inventory information, including the number of lanes, speed limits, pavement widths and rating, bridge widths and ratings, and ROW widths 6. Aerial photos, planimetric mapping, and DTM 7., Environmental data 8. Previously prepared drainage studies 9. Adopted land use maps and plans (if available) 10. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood boundary maps and flood insurance studies and models 11. Public and private utility information 12. Plat research for adjacent properties (if available) 13. Local major thoroughfare plan H. Roadway Design Criteria The Engineer shall develop the roadway design criteria based on the TxDOT Roadway Design Manual and AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets guidelines. The design criteria must include the following roadway design elements: design speed, lane and shoulder widths, pavement structure and slopes, horizontal curvatures, Page 7 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No.'CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop horizontal and vertical clearances, range of vertical profile grades, and side slopes. If there is a discrepancy between the two sources, the TxDOT Roadway Design Manual will govern unless otherwise.directed by the County. I. Preliminary Design Conference The Engineer shall prepare and submit a preliminary Design Summary Report (DSR) to the County for review and approval and shall attend an initial kick-off meeting to establish and agree on fundamental aspects, basic features, concepts, and design crlteria. This meeting will be coordinated with any adjacent roadway projects to ensure continuity with the design of the adjacent roadway projects. 10.2. Schematic Design = General Tasks. A. ROW Property Base Map The Engineer shall obtain information on existing ROW, easements, and property information from as -built plans, ROW maps, and tax records. The Engineer shall prepare a base map depicting the information. B. Typical Sections The Engineer shall develop both existing and proposed typical sections that depict the number and type of lanes, shoulders, median width, curb offsets, cross slope, border width, clear zone widths, and ROW limits. C. Environmental Constraints The Engineer shall evaluate and document impacts to environmentally sensitive sites (as identified by the Engineer and verified by the County) during the schematic design process. Environmentally sensitive sites include natural, cultural, and the human environment. Examples are historic and archeological resources, burial grounds, neighborhood communities and residential areas, farmland, floodplains, wetlands, endangered species, rare habitats, wildlife corridors, wildlife crossings; parks and nature preserves, geologic features, undeveloped areas, and significant trees. D. Drainage 1. The Engineer shall use data from as -built plans and FEMA maps to locate drainage out falls and to determine existing storm sewer and culvert sizes, design flows, and water surface elevations for use in the design of roadway geometry. 2. The. Engineer shall conduct a preliminary drainage study to determine and evaluate the adequacy of the ROW needed to accommodate the proposed roadway and drainage system. The drainage study must: a. identify the impacts to abutting properties and the 100-year floodplain due to proposed highway improvements b. identify the water surface elevations for the 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100=year storm events c. identify and locate outfalls d. provide drainage outfall descriptions e. provide overall drainage area map, sub -drainage area map, and storm water detention facilities f.. . provide a drainage study report identifying the results of the study. , 3. The drainage report, which must be signed and sealed by a professional engineer licensed in Texas, must Include applicable hydrologic and hydraulic models (e.g., HEC-1 Page 8 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop and HEC-2, HEC-RAS, HEC-HMS, XP-SWMM). The models must be approved by the local TOOT district hydraulic engineer prior to generating any reports. If requested, the Engineer shall prepare a final drainage study in accordance with one or more of the following: TxDOT Hydraulic Design Manual, local TOOT district criteria, and any other specific guidance provided by the State and/or County. If requested by the County, the Engineer shall evaluate the adequacy of the existing drainage structures; otherwise, the Engineer shall not evaluate the adequacy of the existing drainage structures. The Engineer shall perform the following: a. Hydrologic Analysis (1) Drainage Area Maps The Engineer shall delineate the drainage area boundaries for the drainage crossings within the project area using U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) or suitable topographic maps, available LiDAR elevation data, and other appropriate information. Drainage Area Map shall be included on the Preliminary Hydraulic Data Sheets for inclusion in Preliminary Drainage Study for the project. (2) ii. Runoff Computations The Engineer shall follow the methodology outlined in the State Hydraulic Design Manual. The Engineer shall also use a hydrologic check method (such as Regional Regression Equations) to compute peak runoff rates at the studied areas for larger drainage area crossings. The report must include the full range of frequencies (2, 5, 10, 25, and 100 AEP50%o, 20% 10%, 4%, 2%, and 1 % AEP). The Engineer shall use information collected via field survey, field observations, review of as -built construction plans, and the effective FEMA Models (if available) to develop hydraulic modeling data for existing bridges and FEMA Zoned drainage structures if available. Software acceptable to the State such as HEC-RAS (1 D/2D) and HY8 shall be utilized. Based on the results of the existing conditions hydraulic modeling and analysis, the. Engineer shall propose and evaluate a design with the objective of reducing flooding potential, protecting structures from erosion and scour, and mitigating potential impacts on flood levels and flow rates. The hydraulic models for the FEMA Zone A/AE locations consist of: Existing Model ii. Updated Model, Zone AE only (if available) W. Corrected Existing Model, Zone AE only (if available) IV. Proposed Model V. Preliminary Hydraulic Data Sheets (3) FEMA Zone Structures The Engineer shall develop (11" x 17") Preliminary Hydraulic Data Sheets for each bridge or FEMA Zone A/AE drainage structure for inclusion in Preliminary Drainage Study for the project. (4) Nan-FEMA Zone Structures The Engineer shall develop (11" x 17") Hydraulic Computation Sheets that summarize the input parameters and hydraulic results in table format for the comparison of the existing and proposed structures for the project. Page 9 of 45 Exhibit Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop Determine which cross -drainage structures are shown to be within areas classified as Waters of the United States, and account for ROW needs for storm drain outfalls. This scope of work excludes'scour analysis and FEMA letter of map change revisions. E. ROW Requirements The Engineer shall determine the ROW requirements based on the proposed alignment, typical sections, design cross sections, access control, terrain, construction requirements, drainage, clear zone, maintenance, intelligent transportation system (ITS), and environmental constraints and mitigation requirements. F. Construction Sequence .The Engineer shall evaluate and document the requirements for construction staging and traffic control throughout the development of schematic design to ensure that the proposed design can be constructed... The Engineer shall provide construction phasing assumptions to the County for review. G. Design Exceptions The Engineer shall identify design exceptions and waivers. The Engineer shall determine the necessity for each design exception or waiver for approval. If the County agrees that design exception or waiver is necessary, the Engineer shall prepare the County's required design exception or design waiver documentation. The Engineer shall document the operational and safety analysis for comparison of the no -build, build with standard design, and build with proposed design alternatives. For interstate facilities, the safety analysis. must include the following: 1. Expected change in crashes from existing conditions to standard design conditions 2. Expected change in crashes from existing conditions to the proposed design H. Traffic Data and Projections For the new highway alignment, the Engineer shall derive the project -level traffic data from TxDOT, Bryan/College Station MPO, and TTI Regional Travel Demand Models to develop the opening -year, design -year (opening year +20), and pavement design year (opening year + 30) travel forecasts, in accordance with the TxDOT Transportation Planning and Programming Division (TPP) Methodology and Procedures. The developed traffic projections must be utilized for design and environmental analysis. The Engineer shall develop traffic forecasts for the mainlanes, ramps, cross streets, interchanges, intersections, and frontage roads for no - build and build alternatives. These projections must include graphic representations of the anticipated daily movements along the corridor (suitable for inclusion in the design schematic and environmental document) and the traffic analysis for highway design table. The Engineer shall prepare a traffic projections methodology memo, based on the information provided in the traffic analysis package. The Engineer shall hold a methodology meeting in order to seek consensus among the different stakeholders (County, TxDOT, BCSMPO, TTl) and to go over critical input data and assumptions feeding the Travel. Demand Models. The key performance metrics to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of build corridor scenario alternatives from the TDM output models will also be discussed and agreed upon at this point. The Engineer shall review the proposed methodology with the County and refine it based on these discussions. The Engineer shall submit the resulting corridor traffic volumes for the preferred build conditions to the County and/or TPP for review and approval. The Engineer shall revise the traffic volumes based on the County's and/or TPP's comments. 1. Financial Plan and Project Management Plan The Engineer shall prepare a financial plan (FP) and project management plan (PMP), in accordance with the most recent FHWA Financial Plan Guidance, for submission by the State Page 10 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop and/or County to the FHWA Division Office for review and approval. The purpose of the FP is to document the project cost estimate and revenue structure and provide reasonable assurance that sufficient financial resources will be available to implement and complete the project as planned. The FP must cover topics such as the project cost estimate, revenue structure, funding resources, project implementation over time based on the available financial resources,, and the cost and revenue assumptions used in development. 1. The initial FP shall consist of at least five main sections including: a. Cost estimate b. Implementation plan c. Financing and. revenues d. Cash flow e. Risk identification and mitigation factors 2. The Engineer shall prepare for and attend a cost estimate review (CER) workshop with the State and/or County and the FHWA to develop and review information for inclusion in the FP such as cost estimation procedures and tools, identifying funding sources and revenues, and project implementation schedules. In preparation for the CER, the Engineer shall conduct a risk analysis assessment, provide cost spreadsheets and models for input into the FHWA's probability modeling software, review and provide comments on the CER summary report, and update cost information in the initial FP to reflect confidence limits, established during the CER. 3. The Engineer shall provide annual updates (AUs) to the initial FP reflecting changes in project finances and funding resources. Each update must include revisions to the five main sections mentioned above as well as discussions of significant cost or revenue changes, comparisons to previous plan estimates, and explanations of mitigating actions taken to adjust for deviations. 4. The Engineer shall submit the PMP, FP, and FP AUs to the County for review and comment. For scoping purposes, it is assumed that the initial drafts of the FP and FP AUs will be reviewed concurrently by the District, the TxDOT Design Division, and TxDOT Finance Division. The Engineer shall address the County's comments and prepare a revised draft for review by the FHWA. The Engineer shall address FHWA comments and prepare the final FP (up to three revision cycles from the State and/or County and FHWA) for the State and/or County to submit to the FHWA for approval. To. document each revision cycle, the Engineer shall develop a comment response forms that includes the comments, comment numbers, page and line numbers of draft where comments originated, page and line numbers where revisions can be located, and the responses. J. Traffic and Operational Analysis The Engineer shall derive and analyze traffic data (including percent trucks, design hourly volume, and directional distribution), obtain existing and projected roadway features (including ramp locations, weaving sections, number of lanes, offset to obstructions, lane widths, frontage road operations, and intersection operation and geometry), traffic flow patterns, and transit and traffic operations. The Engineer shall conduct capacity and Level of Service analyses corridor wide and make recommendations for improving traffic flow. The Engineer shall use the HCM to analyze and make appropriate recommendations. The analysis must be done for existing/base year, opening year, design year (opening+20 year), and interim year (if needed). Results of this analysis must be incorporated into the schematic design for the preferred build alternative..The Engineer shall develop and submit to TxDOT a traffic and operational analysis report summarizing all analysis performed. When microsimulation is Page 11 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop used, the Engineer shall develop and calibrate an existing condition traffic model. The calibration memo must be included in the traffic analysis report. The analysis must be performed using the latest. versions of TxDOT-approved software (e.g., HCS, Synchro, VISSIM, CORSIM, SIDRA, AIMSUN) in accordance with the 2023 TxDOT's Traffic and Safety Analysis Procedures Manual. K. Safety Analysis The Engineer shall review and analyze historical crash data for latest 3 to 5 full calendar years (i.e., January 1 to December 31, inclusive) with respect to crash characteristics such as severity, crash types, frequency, rates, patterns, clusters, and their relationship to crash contributing factors. The purpose of the historical crash analyses is to determine safety performance of the existing conditions to understand any safety issues within the study area. Predictive, or quantitative safety analysis, involves using HSM-based methods that use safety performance functions (SPFs) -and crash -modification factors (CMFs) to estimate anticipated change in crashes from existing condition to the proposed design. The predictive safety analysis must be done for no -build and build conditions for design year. The purpose of the predictive safety analysis is to compare the safety performance of the no -build and build alternatives to help determine the preferred alternative and to determine the countermeasures, if necessary, to improve safety. Predictive safety analysis must be performed using HSM based tools including Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM), HSS, or other tools acceptable to the State and/or County. The Engineer shall develop and submit to the State and/or County a safety analysis as part of the Traffic and Operational Report summarizing all safety analysis performed corridor wide. L. Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations The Engineer shall comply with the United States Department of Transportation Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations. The inclusion of bicycle and pedestrian facilities must be evaluated when the -project is scoped. Public input when applicable, as well as local city and metropolitan planning organization for bicycle and pedestrian plans must be considered in this evaluation. M. Omitted. N.' Omitted. O. Project Implementation Plan The Engineer shall develop an implementation plan for prioritizing improvements along the corridor and identify a sequence of improvements to manage future traffic operations and available funding. The implementation plan must consider traffic operation, the ultimate preferred alternative, and potential funding levels and sources to identify,a timeline for short and mid-term improvements that accommodate corridor growth while minimizing future throwaway construction. The Engineer shall provide the recommendations for the implementation plan in a project implementation report deliverable and incorporate the recommendations into the engineering summary report. 10.3. Conceptual Design Schematics. The Engineer shall develop conceptual design schematics in MicroStation format to evaluate various methods of handling traffic while providing access in key areas. The Engineer shall develop a single preferred design alternative that optimizes traffic flow and access. The conceptual schematics are to be plan view only. Profile work must be done only to the extent necessary to lay out the proper horizontal geometry. The schematics must contain the following design elements: A. Mainlane roadway alignment Page 12 of 45 Exhibit A 0.4. Contract ID No. CIP 23-600, Project 1 Inner Loop B. Pavement. edges, face of curbs, and shoulder lines of mainlanes, intersections, interchanges, and connecting highways or streets C. Typical sections of existing and proposed roadways D. Anticipated structure locations (including wildlife crossings and fencing structures) E. -Anticipated retaining wall and sound wall locations F. Anticipated conveyance of major drainage elements G. Preliminary ROW and easement requirements and control -of -access locations H. Direction of traffic flow and the number of lanes on all roadways I. Existing and projected traffic volumes J. Existing utilities K. Waters of the United States (WOTUS) Geometric Design Schematics. The Engineer shall develop geometric design schematics based on the conceptual schematics after the basic layout, lane arrangement, and anticipated ROW and easement impacts depicted on the conceptual schematics are approved. The Engineer shall use Bentley OpenRoads tools in performing this task. The geometric design schematics must include both a plan view and profile view. A. The geometric schematic plan view must contain the following design elements: 1. Bentley OpenRoads calculated roadway alignments for mainlanes, general purpose lanes, ramps, direct connectors, bridges, HOV lanes, managed lanes, express lanes, collector distributor roads, frontage roads and cross streets at major intersections and grade separations 2. Horizontal curve data shown in tabular format 3. Pavement edges, curb lines, and sidewalks for all roadway improvements 4. Typical sections of existing, and proposed roadways, rail locations, and superstructure depths. 5. Proposed bridge structures, including bridge deck, abutment, bent, and rail locations 6. Proposed retaining walls and sound walls 7. Proposed cross -drainage structures with outfall flow arrows and significant drainage features or waterways identified 8. Existing utilities and proposed utilities 9. Existing property lines and respective property ownership information . 10. Existing ROW and easements 11. Proposed ROW and easements adequate for preparation of ROW maps 12. Waters of the US (WOTUS) 13. Control -of -access limits 14. Existing and projected traffic volumes 15. location and text of the existing and proposed guide signs and the preliminary locations for changeable message signs Page 13 of 45 Exhibit A 49 Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 1.6. Lane lines, shoulder lines, and direction of traffic flow arrows indicating the number of lanes on all roadways B. The geometric schematic profile view must contain the following design elements: 1. . Calculated profile grade and vertical curve data including "K" values for all curves and sight distance values for crest vertical curves on the mainlanes 2. Existing ground line profiles along the mainlanes 3. Grade separations and overpasses including preliminary abutment and bent locations, girder type, and span lengths 4. Calculated vertical clearances at grade separations and overpasses 5. Anticipated cross -drainage structures with approximate inlet and outfall elevations 6. • - Proposed ditch grading. (special grading), if. it does not follow the typical section. 7. Approximate locations of existing and proposed major utility crossings 8. The calculated profile grade for frontage roads, connectors, ramps, and cross streets will be shown on separate Supplemental Profile rolls 10.5. Cross -Sections. The Engineer shall use a Bentley 3D OpenRoads model to generate preliminary cross -sections at 100 feet intervals (unless otherwise directed by the County) and at culvert locations in conjunction with the geometric schematic. The Engineer shall determine earthwork volumes for use in the cost estimate. The Engineer shall prepare 11 inch x17 inch or roll plots of the cross -sections. 10.6. Retaining Walls. The Engineer shall prepare preliminary retaining wall concepts to be shown on schematics, typical sections, and cross sections. A. The Engineer shall determine if any additional walls are required and verify the need for and length of the retaining wall as shown on the ultimate schematic. B. The Engineer shall compute and tabulate retaining wall quantities for preliminary design milestone- plans submittal. 10.7. Renderings and/or Traffic Simulation. The Engineer shall develop renderings, three-dimensional (3D) models, illustrations, and animations as a means of expression and understanding for what the owner of a project envisions and what the public perceives. In support of the public outreach effort, the County will choose reasonable build alternatives, which the Engineer shall carryforward into creating one rendering and/or one traffic animation for each of the various alternatives (up to three). Ther Engineer shall create a 3D model for the reasonable build alternatives from: horizontal and vertical alignments, existing and proposed DTMs, proposed typical sections, traffic counts, and .ground photography. When requested by the County, the Engineer shall use aerial video footage captured by unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). The use of UAS is regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The Remote Pilot in Command (RPIC) must possess a current FAA Remote Pilot Certificate (14 CFR Part 107) and be sufficiently trained, capable, and competent to operate the type of system in the environment in which it is to be operated. The RPIC must be responsible for the safe conduct of the UAS flight. Visual Observers as required must be familiar with UAS operations and In positive two-way communication .with the. RPIC. Additionally, operators must comply with the general safety protocols established In the TxDOT Flight Operations Manual. Page 14 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop The animations and renderings must give the public and stakeholders a clear awareness and appreciation for the reduction of traffic congestion and how traffic is to flow into and out of the project area. 110.8. Preliminary Construction Sequence. The Engineer shall prepare preliminary construction sequence layouts in conjunction with the geometric design schematic depicting the phasing and traffic detours anticipated to safely convey traffic. The layouts must demonstrate that adequate horizontal and vertical alignments are maintained, sufficient lane widths and shoulder widths or barrier offsets are feasible, and construction zones are adequate for constructability of all proposed features. Proposed construction detours must ensure that adequate superelevation is provided. The layouts must indicate how existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities are accommodated for each phase. 110.9. Preliminary Cost Estimate. The Engineer shall prepare a preliminary cost estimate for the project, including the costs of construction, required ROW and associated improvements, and eligible utility adjustments. Current State and/or County unit bid prices must be used in preparation of the estimate. 110.10. Engineering Summary Report. The Engineer shall prepare an engineering summary report to summarize the design criteria, traffic analysis, preliminary cost estimate and basis of estimate, construction sequence description, and utility conflict issues. 110.11. Conduct/Support or Attendance at Value Engineering Study. If requested by the County, the Engineer shall provide documents and drawings for the Value Engineering Study to an independent team. The independent team will review the documents, conduct the study, and present study findings to the County and Engineer at workshop meeting not to exceed three days. 110.12. Agency Coordination and Public Involvement. A. The Engineer shall assist the County in conducting 150 meetings with property owners (100), stakeholders (25), and various agencies (25) to discuss and review the schematic design. The Engineer shall document and respond to issues related. to the schematic design. B. The Engineer shall prepare a Notice and Opportunity to Comment as needed and assist in conducting public meetings and public hearing during the project development process. The Engineer shall prepare schematic exhibits, constraints maps, and other necessary exhibits, and assist the County with all presentations. C. The Engineer shall coordinate, schedule, reserve, and pay for all meeting locations and facilities. D. For all public involvement activities, the Engineer shall prepare the adjacent property owner list; mail out and pay for notices; draft letters to public officials; prepare, publish and pay for notices to major and local newspaper; hire court reporter and law enforcement for public meetings and hearing; and provide audio and visual rental equipment and changeable message boards. E. The Engineer shall attend pre -meetings In preparation for every meeting and hearing, as directed by the County. F. The Engineer shall compile public comments received and responses to comments and prepare the required documentation for all public involvement activities. The Engineer shall comply with the environmental compliance toolkits related to public involvement. Page 15 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. C1P 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 110.13. Schematic Design Project Deliverables. In conjunction with the performance of the services Included under Function Code 110 of this attachment, the Engineer shall provide the following draft and final documents and associated electronic files as applicable A. Draft and final copies of the engineering summary report B. Draft and final copies of the traffic and operational analysis report and safety analysis report C. Draft copies of the preliminary drainage study D. Draft and final copies of the geometric schematic layouts on 11 inch x 17 inch cut sheets or rolls, as requested by the County E. Draft and final copies of the conceptual design schematics roll plots F. Draft and final copies of the geometric schematic layouts (1 inch =100 feet) G. Draft and final copies of the design schematic profiles rolls H. Draft and final copies of the design schematic cross -sections on 11 Inch x 171nch cut sheets or roll plot format, as requested by the County I. Copy of the preliminary cross -sections in a roll plot format or 1.1 inch x17 inch format, as requested by the County J. Electronic 3D model copy of the preliminary cross -sections created using OpenRoads tools K. Six final copies of the preliminary drainage study L. Electronic submittal of the hydrologic and hydraulic model digital files from the drainage study M. Copies of the preliminary construction sequence layouts in a roll plot or 11 inch x 17 inch format, as requested by the County N. Copies of the preliminary construction sequence typical sections in 11 inch x1.7 inch format O. Electronic copy of the 3D rendering and/or traffic simulation for up to two reasonable build alternatives • P. - Electronic files -shall belurnished to -the County on a USB- flash drive Q. Traffic data schematics R. Traffic projections methodology memo and meeting S. Average daily corridor traffic projections report T. Risk management plan U. Participation in CER V. Draft project management plan W. Draft financial plan X. Final project management plan Y. Final financial plan Z. Line schematics with traffic data shown AA. Documentation of public involvement activities BB: Utility plan — electronic file In latest version of MicroStation fully compatible with OpenRoads civil design system CC. Design exception and design waiver documents Page 16 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop DD. Hard copy of a draft hydraulic report for review and comment EE. Culvert hydraulic data sheets,and preliminary culvert layouts FF. Drainage report — one hard copy of final drainage report, one electronic copy of the entire drainage report in PDF format, and computer files of hydrologic and hydraulic modeling with appropriate labeling of location, CSJ, and submittal date GG. Retaining wall layouts HH. Geotechnical report Cost estimates for each milestone submittal JJ. KMZ or KML file of conceptual design schematic created from applicable DGN files for reviewing in Google Earth KK. Final schematic 3D model created using OpenRoads software LL. Draft and final copies of traffic analysis report -IAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 1. Environmental Documentation Standards. Each environmental service provided by the Engineer must have a deliverable. Deliverables must summarize the methods used for the environmental services and the results achieved. The summary of results must be sufficiently detailed to provide satisfactory basis for thorough review by the State and/or County, and (where applicable) other agencies with regulatory oversight. All deliverables must meet regulatory requirements for legal sufficiency and adhere to the requirements for reports enumerated in the State's National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). A. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Review For each deliverable, the Engineer shall perform quality assurance quality control (QA/QC) reviews of environmental documents'and on all supporting environmental documentation to determine whether documents conform with: 1. Current Environmental Compliance Toolkit guidance, documentation requirements, and templates published by TxDOT's Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) and in effect as of the date of receipt of the documents or documentation to be reviewed; 2. Current state and federal laws, regulations, policies, guidance, agreements, and memoranda of understanding between the County and other state or federal agencies; and 3. Guidelines contained in Improving the Quality of Environmental Documents, A Report of the Joint AASHTO/ACEC Committee in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (May 2006) for: a. Readability, and b. Use of evidence and data in documents to support conclusions. Upon request by the County, the Engineer shall provide documentation that the QA/QC reviews were performed by qualified staff. B. The Engineer shall maintain the project environmental record in TxDOT's.Environmental Compliance Oversight System (ECOS), including project review, completing the work Page 17 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop development plan screens, uploading documents, and completing activities as assigned by the District. C. Deliverables must contain all data acquired during the environmental service and be written to be understood by the public in accordance with the TxDOTs Environmental Toolkit guidance, documentation standards, .and current guidelines, policies, and procedures. D. Electronic versions of each deliverable must be written in software that is fully compatible with the software currently used by the State and/or County and provided in the native format of the document for future use by the County. The Engineer shall supplement all hard copy deliverables with electronic copies in searchable Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format unless another format is specified. Each deliverable must be a single, searchable .pdf file that mirrors the layout and appearance of the physical deliverable. The Engineer shall deliver the electronic files in both the document's native format and the PDF format. .E. When the environmental service is to -apply fora permit (e.g., United States Coast Guard (USCG) permit or USACE permit), the Engineer shall provide the permit and all supporting documentation to the County as the deliverable. F. Submission of Deliverables 1. Deliverables shall consist of the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Technical reports and documentation must be prepared to support the applicable environmental classification (e.g. EA). Additionally, Classification Request Form shall be prepared to classify the project. 2. All deliverables must comply with all applicable state and federal environmental laws, regulations, procedures, and TxDOTs Environmental Compliance Toolkits, documentation requirements, and templates. 3. On the cover page of any environmental documentation, the Engineer shall insert the following language in a way that is conspicuous to the reader or include it in a CE project record: 'The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried -out by .TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C..327 and. a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 9, 2019, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT.° G. The County will provide the State's and other agency comments on draft deliverables to the Engineer. The Engineer shall revise the deliverable: 1. To include any County commitments, findings, agreements, or determinations (e.g., wetlands, endangered species consultation, Section 106, or Section 4(f)), required for the transportation activity as specified by the State and/or County; 2. To incorporate the results of public involvement and agency coordination; 3. To reflect mitigation measures resulting from comments received or changes in the transportation activity; and 4. To include with the revised document a comment response form (matrix) in the format provided by the County. H. The Engineer shall provide photographs and graphics that clearly depict details relevant to an evaluation of the project area.. Environmental Assessment (EA) Content and Format. A. ' The Engineer shall provide an EA and ensure that: 1. The EA meets the requirements of 23 CFR §771.119 and TAC, Title 43, Part 1, Chapter 2 and the EA content is sufficiently detailed to meet regulatory requirements for legal Page 18 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop sufficiency and current (at the time of creation) TxDOT ENV guidance and Environmental Compliance Toolkits. 2. Exhibits to be included in reports or EAs must not exceed 11 inches x 17 inches and must be in color. Text pages must be 8.5 inches x 11 inches. Exhibits and text in reports or EAs must be reproducible via photocopying without loss of legibility. The EA documents must be reproduced on plain white paper unless otherwise approved in advance in writing by the County.1 3. The EA must use quality maps and exhibits and must incorporate by reference and summarized background data and technical analyses to support the concise discussions of the alternatives and their impacts. B. Deliverables: 1. Draft EA 2. Revised Draft EA 3. Draft EA for Public Hearing 4. Final EA with FONSI 120.3. Omitted Omitted Environmental Technical Analyses and Documentation. A. Definition of technical analyses and documentation for environmental services. In general, technical analyses and documentation for environmental services might include a report, checklist, form, or analysis detailing resource -specific studies identified during the process of gathering data to make an environmental decision. The County determines what technical reports and documentation are necessary for any given project. The Engineer shall prepare all technical reports and documentation for the County with sufficient detail and clarity to support environmental determinations. All technical reports must be compliant with TxDOT's Environmental Compliance. Toolkits, documentation requirements, and templates. The. environmental document must reference the technical reports. Environmental technical reports and documentation must include appropriate NEPA or federal regulatory language in addition to the purpose and methodology used in delivering the service. Technical reports and forms must use templates and documentation standards as applicable and include sufficient information to determine the significance of impacts. B. Minimum Deliverables: 1. Draft technical analyses and documentation 2. Final technical analyses documentation Page 19 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 3. C. Technical analyses and documentation included as part of this work authorization level are as follows: 1. Section 4(f) Evaluations The Engineer shall provide Section 4(f) Evaluations. The Section 4(f) Evaluation must conform to the appropriate TxDOT Section 4(f) checklist for exceptions, de minimis, and programmatic evaluations. For individual Section 4(f) Evaluations, the format and outline must be approved by the State beforehand. All Section 4(f) Evaluations must meet the requirements set forth in TxDOT's Environmental Compliance Toolkits. The 4(f) Section of the environmental document states the reason a Section 4(f) evaluation is being completed. The 4(f) Section of the environmental document discusses the presence of all Section 4(f) properties located in the project area. 2. Section 6(f) Evaluation The Engineer shall determine if Land and Water Conservation Fund Act funds were used for the Section 4(f) property in accordance with the regulatory requirements and TPWD guidelines and document. 3. Environmental Public Involvement (23 CFR §771.111) The Engineer shall provide public involvement activities, which might include: a. Developing a plan for public involvement activities, public involvement plan. The plan must specify all activities to be performed and alternatives to be discussed during public involvement activities. The plan must also discuss outreach strategies for both the general public and targeted strategies for environmental justice and limited English proficiency populations b. Compiling, maintaining, and updating a mailing list of people, agencies, and organizations interested in the transportation activity. Responding to stakeholder questions and logging communications. c. Making all arrangements for up to two public meetings and up to one hearing, including the site. of the meetings, mailing and distributing notices, preparation of exhibits, provision for taping or transcription of proceedings, security, and any other arrangements as directed by the County. The Engineer shall not hold public meetings or hearings in the absence of County personnel d. Submitting all meeting notices to the County for review no less than six weeks prior to publication e. Arranging a meeting with the County to review all exhibits and other materials to be used prior to public meetings or hearings f. Obtaining the County's approval for all legal notices, exhibits, and other materials g. Providing personnel to staff meetings and hearings; including, people to perform registration, make presentations, and answer questions. Staffing levels of personnel to be provided must be identified in the work authorization h. Developing and submitting to the County up to two meetings and one hearing documentation packet. Scope assumes up to 250 comments in each comment response matrix. i. Developing and sending acknowledgement or response letters to commenters at public meetings or hearings. The Engineer shall not distribute acknowledgement or response letters without prior approval by the County Page 20 of 45 Exhibit A 4. 5. CQ Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop j. Developing, publishing, and distributing a newsletter on the transportation activity, including compiling and maintaining a mailing list. The Engineer shall not distribute the newsletter without prior approval by the County k. Submitting to the County a request for development and maintenance of a website to disseminate information on the transportation activity and to gather comments from the public. I. Develop content for the County to post on their website with up to six updates. Community Impacts Analysis Engineer shall provide community impact analyses. Community impacts includes e Oronmental justice, limited English proficiency, and other issues as addressed in TxDOT environmental guidance. The Engineer shall perform community impact assessments including environmental justice analysis in accordance with Attachment A, Article 38, Sections J and K of the contract. Community impact analyses might include: a. Community Impacts Assessment Technical Report Form; b. Community Technical Report. The report must follow guidance provided in TXDOT`s Community Impacts Assessment Toolkit. The assessment will include: (1) Identification of environmental justice communities within the study area; (2) A community profile; (3) A displacement analysis; (4) An access and travel pattern analysis; (5) A community cohesion analysis; (6) Determination if the project would have disproportionately high and adverse impacts on environmental justice communities. All impacts identified in the Community Impact Assessment and other relevant studies (i.e. noise analysis) must be considered to determine if the impacts disproportionately affect environmental justice communities; (7) Identification -of possible mitigation measures to avoid or minimize any adverse impacts to the environmental justice population within the project area; (8) Summary of public involvement process including methods used to accommodate persons with limited English proficiency; and (9) Identification of possible mitigation measures including those to avoid and minimize any adverse impacts to the environmental justice population within the project area. Induced Growth Impact Analysis and Cumulative Impacts Analysis The Engineer shall perform analysis to fulfill the requirements of NEPA and the most current version of the TxDOT Guidance on Preparing Impact Analyses and Cumulative Impacts Analysis Guidelines in TxDOT's Environmental Compliance Toolkits. Air Quality Studies The Engineer shall prepare a[I required technical reports and the air quality section of all environmental documents in accordance with the current version of the TxDOT Environmental Handbook for Air Quality and Air Quality Toolkit. The technical reports and documentation include: a. Qualitative mobile source air toxics (MSAT) analysis, Page 21 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 inner Loop b. Applicable disclosure statements in the environmental document as prescribed in the TxDOT Guidance for Preparing Air Quality Statements, and c. Response to public comments received on air quality issues. 7. Noise Analysis Technical Reporting The Engineer shall prepare all necessary noise analyses and technical reporting. a. Noise Analysis Technical Reporting Requirements. At the work authorization level, the noise analysis technical reporting might include: (1) Computer modeling of existing and predicted noise levels; (2) Field measurements of existing noise levels and validation of existing model; (3) Determining predicted noise impact contours for undeveloped property; (4) Barrieranalysis for impacted receivers. b. Noise Analysis General Requirements. (1) The Engineer shall use TxDOT's .DGN file coordinate system for all traffic noise modeling, so that all design files and traffic noise modeling software coordinate systems are the same. (2) The Engineer shall provide TxDOT with all .DXF flies used for the traffic noise model. (3) The Engineer shall review all proposed noise barrier locations as part of the traffic noise modeling process. 8. The Engineer shall not begin identification of noise sensitive land uses unless TxDOT's Environmental Affairs Division's Historical Studies Branch (ENV -Historical Studies) has approved a Project Coordination Request (PCR). 9. Water Resources Analysis and Documentation The Engineer shall provide environmental documentation, conduct field surveys, and provide analysis of water resources for compliance with state and federal regulations as described in the Environmental Guide: Volume 2 Activity Instructions, http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/env/toolkit/060-06-gui.pdf; and the associated forms, templates, and guidance found in the Water Resources section of the Natural Resources Toolkit, https://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/environmental/compliance- toolkits/natu ral-resources. htm I. The Engineer shall provide the following water analysis: a. Surface Water Analysis Form, including analysis of: (1) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (2) Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (3) General Bridge Act/Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (4) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (5) Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (6) Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands b. WOTUS Delineation report prepared in accordance with ENV's Documentation Standard for Waters of the U.S. Delineation Report using ENV's Template: Waters of the U.S. Delineation Report including all supporting forms and exhibits Page 22 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop c. Section 404/10 Impacts Table prepared in accordance with TOOT ENV's Section 404110 Impacts Table and Instructions — Preparing a Section 404110 Impacts Table d. Section 404 Permitting Package, including: (1) USACE PCN Permitting Application prepared in accordance with TOOT ENV's Documentation Standard for PCN (2) Conditional/Functional Assessment (3) 401 Certification e. For all WOTUS surveys, the Engineer shall: (1) Provide the results of the land survey in electronic. DGN file format to be incorporated Into the schematic and plans. GIS and KMZ files of the land survey must also be provided. (2) Determine the acres of permanent and temporary impacts and linear feet of impacts at each WOTUS and provide figures of the WOTUS and associated impacts overlaying the schematic and plan sheets. 10. Biological/Natural Resources Management Analysis and Documentation The Engineer shall provide environmental documentation, conduct field surveys, and provide analysis of biological natural resources for compliance with state and federal regulations as described in the TxDOT Environmental Guide: Volume 2 Activity Instructions, http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/env/toolkit/060-06-gui.pdf, and the associated forms, templates, and guidance found in the Natural Resources Toolkit, https://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdottdiVision/environmental/compliance-toolkits/natural- resources.html. The Engineer shall provide the following biological/natural resource analysis: a. Species Analysis Form, including: (1) Species Analysis Spreadsheet, Including a habitat analysis for the entire project area, and field surveys for protected species, or suitable habitat. (2)... Tier 1.Site.Assessment, which can. include early coordination or administrative coordination with TPWD. (3) Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) analysis and coordination assistance. b. Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) analysis 11. Preparation of USFWS/National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) species consultation, including section 7 formal consultation for USFWS/NMFS 12. Initial Site Assessment (ISA) with Hazardous Materials Project. Impact Evaluation Report The Engineer shall provide an ISA with Hazardous Materials Project Impact Evaluation Report for the limits of the proposed project in accordance with Statement of Work for Hazardous Materials Processes related to NEPA in the TOOT Hazardous Materials Management Toolkit (http://www.txdot.ciov/inside- txdot/d ivi sion/environ mental/compliance-tool kits/h az-mat. htm I ). 13. Archeological Documentation Services The Engineer shall provide archeological studies and documentation. All archeological studies must be' sufficient to satisfy the current TxDOT Archeological. Sites and Cemeteries Toolkit. An archeological background study must be performed prior to field Page 23 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop work. If the Engineer was provided with a background study by the State, a new background study is not required. The Engineer shall provide archeological resource identification, evaluation, and documentation services. In compliance with TxDOT's Environmental Compliance Toolkits, the Engineer shall provide the following archeological services/deliverables: a. Archeological background study b. Antiquities Permit Application c. Archeological reconnaissance survey d. Archeological intensive survey and reporting An archeological survey (reconnaissance or intensive) must be sufficient to satisfy state and federal regulations. The applicable archeological survey must be determined at the work authorization level. The Engineer shall contact TxDOT's Environmental Affairs Division's Archeological Studies Branch (ENV -ARCH) for approval prior to starting field and survey work. ENV -ARCH will verify that approved methods and appropriately permitted and experienced staff will be used. 14. Historic Resource Identification, Evaluation, and Documentation Services The Engineer shall provide historic resource identification, evaluation, and documentation services. In compliance with TxDOT's Environmental Compliance Toolkits, the Engineer shall provide the following historic resource services/deliverables: a. Historic Resources PCR, b. Historic Resources Research Design, and c. Historic Resource Survey Report, including windshield, reconnaissance, or intensive level documentation. All services, except the historic resource PCR, must have prior approval by TxDOT's Environmental Affairs. Division's Historical Studies Branch (ENV-HIST) to be performed. The historic resource PCR must be accepted by ENV-HIST prior to survey field work. 15. Floodplain Impacts The Engineer shall determine whether the transportation activity has the potential to affect floodplains. Studies for floodplain impacts must fulfill the requirements of Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650, Subpart A. Documentation must: a. Briefly describe the watershed characteristics of the study area in terms of land uses and changes in land use that may affect stream discharge. b. Briefly describe the streams in the study area, including evidence of stream migration, down cutting, or aggradati'ons. c. Identify the presence and nature (e.g., zone A, zone AE, zone AE with floodway) of any- FEMA mapped floodplains; including the panel number. d. Indicate ,the existence of any significant development associated with the mapped area and identify the jurisdiction responsible for the floodplain. e. Identify the locations where an alternative might encroach on the base (100-year) floodplain (encroachments), where an alternative might support incompatible floodplain development, and the potential impacts of encroachments and floodplain development. This identification must be included in the text and on a map. f. Include a list of all jurisdictions having control over floodplains for each alternative. Page 24 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23.600 Project 1 Inner Loop g. Where an encroachment or support of incompatible floodplain development results in impacts, provide more detailed information on the location, impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures. In addition, if any alternative (1) results in a floodplain encroachment or supports incompatible floodplain development having significant impacts, or (2) requires a commitment to a particular structure size or type, the report must include an evaluation and discussion of practicable alternatives to the structure or to the significant encroachment. The report must include exhibits that display the alternatives, the base floodplains and, where applicable, the regulatory floodplains. h. For each alternative encroaching on a designated or regulatory floodplain, provide a preliminary indication of whether the encroachment is consistent with or requires a revision to the regulatory floodplain. If the preferred alternative encroaches on a regulatory floodplain, the report must discuss the consistency of the action with the regulatory floodplain. In addition, the report must document coordination with FEMA and local or state agencies with jurisdiction indicating that a revision is acceptable or that a revision is not required. If the preferred alternative includes a floodplain encroachment having significant impacts, the report must include a finding that it is the only practicable alternative as required by 23 CFR 650, Subpart A. The finding must refer to Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650, Subpart A. In such cases the report must document compliance with the Executive Order 11988 requirements and must be supported by the following information: (1) The reasons why the,proposed action must be located in the floodplain; (2) The alternatives considered and why they were not practicable; and (3) A statement indicating whether the action conforms to applicable state or local floodplain protection standards 16. Stormwater Permits (Section 402 of the Clean Water Act) The Engineer shall: a. describe the need to .use .the,TPDES General Permit, TX 150000. The text must describe how the project will comply with the terms of the TPDES, including the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan; and b. describe the need for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) notification. List MS4 participating municipalities. HT -OF -WAY (ROW) DATA AND UTILITY ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION For Function Codes 130 and 150, the term Surveyor means the firm (prime provider or subprovider) that is providing the surveying services shown in this scope. The Engineer shall ensure that the following general standards for survey work are followed for Function Ciodes 130 and 150: Unless otherwise indicated, any reference in this attachment to a manual, specification, policy, rule or regulation, or law means the version in effect at the time the work is performed. TxDOT manuals are available at: http://onlinemanuals.b(dot.gov/manuals/. All surveys must meet or exceed all applicable requirements and standards provided by: (1) Professional Land Surveying Practices Act, (2) General Rules of Procedures and Practices promulgated by the Texas Board of Page 25 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop onal Engineers and Land Surveyors (TBPELS), and (3) TxDOT Survey Manual. The Surveyor shall all work in an organized and professional manner. All surveys are subject to the approval of the e Surveyor shall use the TxDOT ROW Preliminary Procedures for Authority to Proceed Manual and TxDOT irvey Manual as the basis for the format and preparation of all right of way (ROW) documents produced, :luding ROW maps, written parcel descriptions, parcel plats, and other ROW work products, unless ierwise specified by the County. less otherwise directed by the County, the Surveyor shall use (1) the North American Datum of 1983 AD83), Texas Coordinate System of 1983 (State Plane Coordinates) applicable to the zone or zones in rich the work is performed, with values in U.S. survey, feet, as the basis for all horizontal coordinates derived d (2) the datum adjustment currently in use by TxDOT. oject or surface coordinates must be calculated by applying a combined adjustment factor (CAF) to State ane Coordinate values. If provided by the County, the Surveyor shall -use a project specific CAF. avations must be based on the North American Vertical Datum 88 (NAVD88), unless otherwise specified by County. work using the Global Positioning System (GPS), whether primary control surveys or other,, must meet or need the requirements provided by the TxDOT Survey Manual to the order of accuracy specified in the tegories listed below or in a work authorization. If the order of accuracy is not specified in this attachment or a work authorization, the work must meet or exceed the order of accuracy specified in the publication listed this paragraph. conventional horizontal and vertical control surveys must meet or exceed the order of accuracy specified in TxDOT Survey Manual unless specified otherwise in the contract. boundary determination surveys, whether for ROW acquisition, ROW re-establishment, or other boundary :eds, must meet or exceed the accuracy specified in the TxDOT Survey Manual unless specified otherwise in contract. County may authorize the Surveyor to use an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) to perform services under contract. The use of UAS is regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). All UAS operators ;t comply with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations and the TxDOT Unmanned Aircraft tem.(UAS) Flight. Operations and .User's Manual. - . survey data must be fully compatible with the State's computer system and with programs in use by the to at the time of the submission, without further modification or conversion. The current programs used by IOT are: Microsoft Word, Bentley MicroStation, Bentley OpenRoads civil design system, Bentley GEOPAK vey, Excel, and ESRI ArcGIS. Data collection programs must be compatible with the current import formats wed by GEOPAK Survey and be attributed with current feature codes. These programs may be replaced at discretion of the State. wing sizes are defined, based on American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard paper sizes, as )ws: A -size means 8.5 inches by 11.0 inches, B-size means 11.0 inches by 17.0 inches, C-size means 17.0 ies by 22.0 inches, and D-size means 22 inches by 34.0 inches. from these software applications or other requirements listed above shall only be allowed if in writing by the Surveyor and approved by the County. The Surveyor shall perform quality control/quality assurance on all procedures, field surveys, data, and products prior to delivery to the County. The County may also require the Surveyor to review the survey work performed by others. If, at any time, during the course of reviewing a submittal of any item it becomes apparent to the County that the submittal contains a substantial number of errors, omissions, and inconsistencies, the County may cease -its review and return the submittal to the Surveyor immediately for appropriate corrective action. A submittal returned to the Surveyor for this, reason is not a submittal for purposes of the submission schedule. Page 26 of 45 Exhibit A i Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop standards for services that are not boundary -related but that relate to surveying for engineering projects be determined by the construction specifications, design specifications, or as specified by the County: 130.1. Omitted I 130.2. Omitted A. GIS Submission Requirements and Standards All ROW mapping project work authorizations are subject to the standards and required ArcGIS deliverables detailed in Chapter 4, Section 8 of the TxDOT ROW Preliminary Procedures for the Authority to Proceed Manual. Omitted Omitted 5. Utility Engineering Investigation. Utility engineering investigation includes utility investigations subsurface and above ground prepared in accordance with ASCE/CI Standard 38-02 The Engineering Investigation for each Quality Level will be determined at each phase of the project as needed.[(http://www.fhwa.dot.aov/programadmin/asce.cfm)] and Utility Quality Levels. A. Utility Quality Levels (QL) Utility Quality Levels are defined in cumulative order (least to greatest) as follows: 1. Quality Level D - Quality level value assigned to a utility segment or utility feature after a review and compilation of data sources such as existing records, oral recollections, locations marked by DIGTESS, and data repositories. 2. Quality Level C - Quality level value assigned to a utility segment or utility feature after surveying aboveground (i.e., visible) utility features and using professional judgement to correlate the surveyed locations of these features with those from existing utility records. 3. Quality Level B - Designate: Quality level value assigned to a utility segment or subsurface utility feature whose existence and position is based upon appropriate surface geophysical methods combined with professional judgment and whose location is tied to the project survey datum. Horizontal accuracy of Designated Utilities is 18" (including survey tolerances) unless otherwise indicated for a specific segment of the deliverable. Quality Level B incorporates quality levels C and D information. A composite plot is created. 4. Quality Level A — Quality level value assigned to a portion (x, y, and z geometry) of a point of a subsurface utility feature that is directly exposed, measured, and whose location and dimensions are tied to the project survey datum. Other measurable, observable, and judged utility attributes are also recorded (per District Best Practices). The utility location must be tied to the project survey datum with an accuracy of 0.1 feet (30-mm) vertical and to 0.2 feet (60-mm) horizontal. As test holes may be requested up front or during the project, test holes done prior to completion of QL D, C, or B deliverables must be symbolized on the QL B deliverable with a call out indicating test holes number. This is in addition to and not in lieu of the test hole. B. Utility Investigations Methodology 1. Utility Investigation Quality Level D For the Schematic / Environmental Phase, CivilCorp will provide only SUE Quality Level D within a single corridor that includes the following existing'utilities: Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU), a municipally owned utility serving the citizens of Bryan/College Station and Brazos County with electricity, drinking water and wastewater services; communication companies including AT&T, Frontier, Next, Bright Page 27 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop Speed, Optimum and Earthlink; Water and Utility Districts providing drinking water and wastewater services. According to Texas Railroad Commission website, there are approx. 58 pipeline crossings including Atmos Gas, Atmos Pipeline, Energy Transfer, Wilson Creek Utility District, Enterprise Products, Magellan, Northfield Enterprises, Wildfire Energy Midstream, Entergy, and ExxonMobil Pipeline. Also, there are approx.11 transmission power line crossings (138 KV and 69 KV). - The Engineer shall: a. Perform work site visitation 1 field reconnaissance b. Develop work plans for County Approval. c. Review and compile data sources. d. Perform records research from all available resources. Sources include: Texas811, Railroad Commission of Texas•(Texas.RRC), verbal recollection, as -built information from plans, plats, permits and any other applicable information provided by the utility owners or other stakeholders. e. Document utility owners and contact information. f. Create a utility drawing of information gathered. 2. Designate (Quality Level B) (Within proposed 150'ft ROW only) Designate means to indicate the horizontal location of underground utilities by the application and interpretation of appropriate non-destructive surface geophysical techniques and reference to established survey control. Designating (Quality Level B) services are inclusive of Quality Levels C and D. The Engineer must: a. As requested by the County, compile "as -built" information from plans, plats and other location data as provided by the utility owners. b. Request Right of Entry in accordance to General Requirements Section 1.4 of this Attachment A. c. Coordinate with Survey to tie utilities to project survey datum. d. Coordinate with utility owner when utility owner's policy is to designate their own facilities at no cost for preliminary survey purposes. The Engineer shall examine utility owner's work to ensure accuracy and completeness. e. Designate, record, and mark the horizontal location of the existing utility facilities using non-destructive surface geophysical techniques. f. Using both active and passive scans to attempt to locate any additional utilities, including unrecorded and abandoned storm and sanitary sewer facilities, at the direction of the state, may be investigated using additional methods such as rodding that would then classify them as Quality Level B. A non -water based pink paint or pink pin flags must be used on all surface markings of underground utilities. g. Correlate utility owner records with designating data and resolve discrepancies using professional judgment. The Engineer must prepare and deliver to County a color -coded composite utility facility plan with utility owner names, quality levels, line sizes and subsurface utility locate (test hole) locations. The Engineer and County acknowledge that the line sizes of designated utility facilities detailed on the deliverable will be from the best available records and that an actual line size is normally determined from a test hole vacuum excavation. A note must be placed on the designate deliverable only that states "lines sizes are from best available Page 28 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop records". All above -ground utility feature locations must be included in the deliverable to the County. This information must be provided in the latest version of OpenRoads civil design system .used by the State. The Engineer shall deliver the electronic file on USB flash drive, as requested by the State. A hard copy is required and must be signed, sealed, and dated by the registered engineer overseeing the utility engineering investigation. When requested by the County, the designated utility information must be over laid on the County's design plans. h. Determine and inform the County of the approximate electronic utility depths at critical locations as determined by the County. The limits of this additional information should be determined prior to the commencement of work. This depth indication is understood by both the Engineer and the County to be approximate only and is not intended to be used preparing the ROW and construction plans. i. Provide a monthly summary, with weekly updates, of work completed and In process with adequate detail to verify compliance with agreed work schedule. J. Close-out permits as required. k. Clearly identify all utilities that were discovered from Quality Levels C and D investigation but cannot be depicted in Quality Level B standards. These utilities must have a unique line style and symbology in the designate (Quality Level B) deliverable. _ Comply with all applicable TxDOT policy and procedural manuals. 3. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hole) Service (Quality Level A) (Estimated 10 test holes) Locate is the process used to obtain precise horizontal and vertical position, material type, condition, size, and other data that may be obtainable about the utility facility and its surrounding environment through exposure by non-destructive excavation techniques that ensures the integrity of the utility facility. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hole) Services (Quality Level A) are inclusive of Quality Levels B, C, and D. The Engineer must: a. Review requested test hole locations and advise the County in the development of an appropriate locate (test hole) woek plan relative to the existing utility infrastructure and proposed highway design elements. Request Right of Entry in accordance to General Requirement Section 1.4 of this Attachment A. b. Coordinate with Survey to tie utilities to project survey datum. Prepare, review, and document test hole data sheets. c. Coordinate with utility owner inspectors as may be required by law or utility owner policy. d. Place Texas 811 ticket 48 hours prior to excavation. e. Neatly cut and remove existing pavement material, such that the cut does not exceed 0.10 square meters (1.076 square feet) unless unusual circumstances exist. f. Measure and record the following data on an appropriately formatted test hole data sheet that has been sealed and dated by the Engineer: (1) Elevation of top of utility tied to the datum of the furnished plan. (2) Minimum of two benchmarks utilized. Elevations must be within an accuracy . . of 15mm (.591 inches) of utilized benchmarks. (3) Elevation of existing grade over utility at test hole location. (4) Horizontal location referenced to project coordinate datum. Page 29 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. C1P 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop (5) Outside diameter of pipe or width of duct banks and configuration of non - encased multi -conduit systems. (6) ' Utility facility materials. (7) Utility facility condition. (8) Pavement thickness and type. (9) Coating/wrapping information and condition. (10) Unusual circumstances or field conditions. g. Excavate test holes in such a manner as to prevent any damage to wrappings, coatings, cathodic protection, and other protective coverings and features. Water excavation can only be utilized with written approval from the appropriate TxDOT district office. h. Be responsible for any damage to the utility during the locating process. In the event of damage, the Engineer must stop work, notify the appropriate utility facility owner, the County, and appropriate regulatory agencies. The regulatory agencies include: the Railroad Commission of Texas and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. The Engineer shall not resume work until the utility facility owner has determined the corrective action to be taken. The Engineer is liable for all costs involved in the repair or replacement of the utility facility. L Back fill all excavations with appropriate material, compact backfill by appropriate mechanical means, and restore pavement and surface material. The Engineer is responsible for the integrity of the backfill and surface restoration for a period of three years. j. Furnish and install a permanent above -ground marker (as specified by the County, directly above center line of the utility facility. k. Provide complete restoration of work site and landscape to equal or better condition than before excavation. If a work site and landscape is not appropriately restored, the Engineer shall return to correct the condition at no extra charge to the County. I. Estimating Right of Way Costs. The Right of Way Data task for estimating right of way costs will involve researching property information on up to,two proposed routes for the project, providing estimates of the cost to acquire the right of way, offering suggested revisions to the route which could potentially save right of way costs and participate in regular prlo)ect meetings. More specifically, upon receipt of preliminary plans and a request to begin work, ORC will obtain the vesting deed and other information located in the County records for each property that appears to be directly affected by the project. At the same time, ORC will work with an appraisal firm to prepare a market study for land values. This market study will provide information on current sales of properties which are similar to those properties possibly being affected by the project. ORC will use this data from the market study to determine an estimate of the cost to acquire the property rights needed from each parcel. These values will be expressed in terms of the cost as of the date of the ORC deliverable. The information will be prepared via a desktop review and will not involve a visit to, nor an in - person review of,.the project area. The ORC report will be provided in the form of an excel spreadsheet that will indicate each parcel being directly affected by the project and identified with the owner's name as determined by the current vesting deed and county records, along with county assessor parcel ID, and an estimate of the cost of the property rights to be acquired including possible damages to the remainder. Where Page 30 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 .Project 1 Inner Loop plicable, ORC will also estimate the amount of relocation benefits which may be claimed by each parcel. tC will provide one update to each excel spreadsheet report, which incorporates agreed upon revisions. For ch of the two routes, the report will be submitted within 90 days of ORC being provided with a set of Aminary plans and a request to begin work. The one updated report on each route will be submitted within days of ORC being requested to begin work on the updated report. It is assumed that there will be no more than 200 parcels to .be researched. ,C, anticipates the need for a series of meetings to allow ORC to remain up to date on the project, to provide explanation for information in the deliverables and to discuss possible revisions to the route or specific perties. ORC assumes there will be 20 virtual meetings, each about one hour in length, which will be ,nded by two ORC staff persons. information and requests will be provided to ORC to allow completion of this assignment by no later than .ember 31,.2024. ,C will provide an excel spreadsheet that will indicate each parcel being directly affected by the project and ntified with the owner's name as determined by the current vesting deed, along with county assessor parcel and an estimate of the cost of the property rights to be acquired including possible damages to the nainder. Where applicable, ORC will also estimate the amount of relocation benefits which may be claimed each parcel. ORC will provide two updates to each excel spreadsheet report which incorporates agreed m revisions. — MANAGI MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION 1. Contract Management and Administration. The. Engineer shall: A. Act as an agent for the County when specified in a work authorization. B. Produce a complete and acceptable deliverable for each environmental service performed for environmental documentation. C. Incorporate environmental data into identification of alternatives. D. Notify the County of its schedule, in advance, for all field activities. E. Notify the County as soon as practical, by phone and in writing, if performance of environmental services discloses the presence or likely presence of significant impacts (in accordance with 40 Code of Federal. Regulations (CFR) 1500-1508). Inform the County of the basis for concluding there are significant impacts and the basis for concluding that the impacts might require mitigation. F. Notify the County, as soon as practical, by phone and in writing, if performance of environmental services results in identification of impacts or a level of controversy that might elevate the transportation activity's status from a categorical exclusion or environmental assessment. The County will reassess the appropriate level of documentation. Page 31 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop DESIGN SURVEYS AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS 150.1. Omitted Omitted Omitted Omitted Mapping (15.3). Mapping includes the geospatial data collection and mapping by means of aerial photogrammetry, terrestrial (close range) photogrammetry, terrestrial LIDAR, mobile LIDAR, and other remote sensing technologies. A. Purpose The purpose of mapping is to provide map and related data to support transportation projects including project design and other uses. B. Definitions 1.. Aerial Photogrammetry (15.3.1) —Aerial Photogrammetry means the collection and processing of photography acquired from an airborne platform to develop DGN and DTM flies. 2. Airborne LiDAR (15.3.4) — Airborne LIDAR means laser scanning equipment mounted on a helicopter or other airborne platform to collect data to process for DGN and DTM files. 3. Mobile LIDAR (15.3.4) — Mobile LIDAR means laser scanning equipment mounted on a moving vehicle operating on the earth's surface to collect data to process for DGN and DTM files. Aerial Mapping Using a Metric Camera and Manned Aircraft. Aerial mapping using a metric camera and manned aircraft includes the collection of digital aerial imagery using a calibrated large -format -metric aerial camera, performing relative orientation of the imagery through the collection of tie and pass points between adjacent aerial photo frames, performing a least -squares bundled absolute orientation adjustment using ground control points supplemented with airborne GPS and inertial measurement unit (IMU) data, and deriving data from the processed imagery including compilation of planimetric and topographic maps, creation of point cloud digital elevation model (DEM) and digital terrain model (DTM) data, and production of orthophotography. The Surveyor shall provide the services of a certified Photogrammetrist to perform or oversee the tasks under function code 150.6. The Surveyor remains ultimately responsible and shall ensure that the work is performed as required. A. Purpose The purpose of aerial mapping using a metric camera and manned aircraft is to provide map and related data to support' transportation projects including project design and other uses. B. Definitions In 150.6, 150.7, and 150.8 the following definitions apply: 1. Photogrammetrist means an American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) Certified Photogrammetrist with a current certification. Page 32 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 2. Mapping Scientist means an American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) Certified Scientist-UAS with a current certification. 3. Metric Aerial Photograph means a vertical photograph taken from a manned aircraft using a large -format calibrated digital metric aerial mapping camera. 4. Large -format digital metric camera means a camera using charge -coupled device (CCD) or complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology to capture an image with a minimum final image size of 11500 by 7500 pixels. 5. Analytical triangulation means the process of developing absolute orientation parameters for individual photogrammetric stereo models through the use of image tie and pass points combined with ground control in a fully weighted least -squares bundle adjustment. Airborne GPS and IMU data may be used to reduce the number of ground control points. 6. Ground control means points established on the ground by the Surveyor and for which the Northing, Easting, and Elevation coordinates have been determined sufficient in number and geospatial distribution to allow analytical triangulation and mapping to meet the required project accuracy. Ground control can be targeted using paint or other marker material or can be non -targeted. 7. Airborne GPS/IMU —An airborne GPS receiver on -board the aircraft recording GPS and orientation data to be included in the analytical triangulation with the purpose of reducing the number of ground control points required for a metric aerial mapping task. IMU data to supplement the analytical triangulation is optional and its use is at the discretion of the Certified Photogrammetrist or Mapping Scientist. 8. KML means an uncompressed Google Keyhole Markup Language file, which is a two- or three- dimensional map showing a location on the earth. 9. KMZ means a compressed Google Keyhole Markup Language file, which is a two- or three- dimensional map showing a location on the earth. 10. DEM means digital elevation model, which is a three-dimensional DGN and/or point cloud in ASPRS LAS 1.2 file format containing all features located in the project area including features both on and above the ground surface. 11. DTM means digital terrain model, which is a three-dimensional DGN and/or point cloud in ASPRS LAS 1.2 format containing only features located on the ground surface. 12. Field Check means a ground survey validation of the deliverable map product with the purpose of ensuring that the required mapping accuracy has been met. 13. Flight Map means a map depicting the flight line and ground control layout over the project area. 14. Low Altitude Metric Aerial Photography means a metric aerial photography with a nominal ground pixel size of 5 cm or less. 15. DGN means a two or three-dimensional graphics file produced using Bentley MicroStation. The file may contain features and improvements plotted in a horizontal plane along the N and E axes which correspond to the Texas Coordinate System. The file may contain 2D or 3D elements representing topographic, existing, proposed, schematic, and general layout features. C. Procedure for Aerial Mapping Using a Metric Camera and Manned Aircraft 1. Ground Control The positioning and density of ground control is at the discretion of the Photogrammetrist. Ground control is required to be sufficient to meet the accuracy standard required for the final mapping products. Chapter 3 of the TxDOT Survey Manual provides guidance for Page 33 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop the location and density of the ground control. The Photogrammetrist must determine the approximate position for ground control points. The Surveyor shall locate and mark the ground control points in the field using surveying methods. 2. Metric Digital Aerial Photography The Photogrammetrist must acquire metric digital aerial photography using a large -format calibrated metric aerial mapping camera. Unless otherwise stated, the imagery will be low altitude with a maximum nominal ground sampling distance of 5.0 cm. The Photogrammetrist must ensure that all imagery acquisition requirements including all flight parameters are met such that the imagery is suitable for intended use. 3. Analytical Triangulation The Photogrammetrist must process the metric digital aerial photography, ground control, and airborne GPS/IMU data (if collected) to develop an absolute orientation of the imagery suitable for map compilation at the required accuracy. 4. Aerial Mapping The Photogrammetrist must prepare the following: a. A two-dimensional DGN file containing planimetric map features. b. A three-dimensional DGN file containing DTM features. c. - Orthophotography The Photogrammetrist must provide orthorectified aerial imagery covering the project area. D. Technical Requirements 1. Aerial mapping using a metric camera and manned aircraft must be performed under the direct supervision of an ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist. 2. Unless otherwise stated, aerial mapping must meet or exceed the requirements for ASPRS Class 1 mapping at a 1 inch = 40 feet equivalent scale with a one -foot indicated contour interval. E. Data Requirements 1. Planimetric DGN files must be fully compatible with the current Bentley MicroStation version graphics program used by TxDOT without further modification or conversion. 2. Electronically collected and processed field survey data files must be fully compatible with TxDOT's computer systems without further modification or conversion. All flies must incorporate only those feature codes currently being used by the State. 3. DTM must be fully compatible with the current version of Bentley OpenRoads civil design system used by TxDOT without further modification or conversion. All DTM must be fully edited to provide a complete digital terrain model with all necessary break lines.. 4. File features and level structure must be in accordance with the State's current photogrammetry mapping legend. 5. Minimum textsize is 0.1 inches when plotted at a scale of 1 inch = 40 feet. F. Deliverables for Aerial Mapping Using a Metric Camera and Manned Aircraft The Photogrammetrist must submit the following: 1. Digital orthophotography delivered on USB flash -drive or hard -drive in Tagged Image File format (TIF) compatible with Bentley MicroStation software and including georeferenced world files. Page 34 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 2. A photo index map in DGN and KMZ format showing the location of each digital image frame. The index map must be overlaid on a base map to provide general location information. 3. An orthophoto index map in DGN, KMZ, and PDF format showing the location of each orthophoto panel. The PDF format index map must be overlaid on a base map to provide general locational information. 4. DGN files for the planimetric and DTM mapping. 150.7. Omitted Omitted Omitted Placement and survey of horizontal and vertical control for aerial mapping establishes ground control for aerial mapping projects. A. Purpose The purpose of an aerial photography control survey is to provide ground control for aerial mapping projects. B. Definitions In 150.9, Aerial Photography Control Survey means reconnaissance, field work, analysis, computation, and documentation necessary to provide horizontal and vertical position of specific ground points. The ground control points are used in photogrammetric processing. C. Procedure for Horizontal and Vertical Control for Aerial Mapping The Surveyor shall:. Prepare and submit for approval an aerial ground control layout in DGN and KML format based on the target positions selected by the Certified ,Photogrammetrist. The layout must show the location of the proposed primary project control and aerial ground control points. 2. Establish and determine the horizontal and vertical coordinates of the primary project control points and aerial ground control points. 3. Place aerial ground control targets at the point location and maintain the targets until the aerial flight has been completed. D. Technical Requirements 1. Aerial photography control surveys must be performed under the direct supervision of a RPLS currently registered with the TBPELS. 2. The horizontal and vertical coordinates of the aerial control points must be based on acceptable methods, conducted by the Surveyor, and must meet the standards of accuracy as set forth below: Survey Level 3 accuracy, as described in the TxDOT Survey Manual, latest edition, or the equivalent level of accuracy described in the TSPS Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas. E. Data Requirement The Surveyor shall perform post processing of field data, which will be reviewed by the State. Data processed by standard calculators, computers, and other business hardware and .software normally maintained and used by the Surveyor will be considered acceptable. Page 35 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop F. Deliverables The Surveyor shall submit the. following: 1. A final aerial control point layout in DGN and KML format showing the location of the primary control and target points labeled with their respective alpha -numeric designation. 2. A plot and computer graphics of an B-size index map showing an overall view of the project and the relationship of primary monumentation and control used in the preparation of the project, signed and sealed by a 'RPLS, and as directed by the State. 3. A plot and computer graphics of a B-size horizontal and vertical control sheet showing the primary survey control monumentation used in the preparation of the project, signed and sealed by a RPLS, and as directed by the State. 4. An A -size data sheet for each aerial ground control point, which must include a location sketch, a physical -description of the•point,. surface coordinates, elevation, and datums used. 5. A USB flash drive containing the graphics files and scanned images of the control data sheets. 6. A written statement describing the datum used along with copies of all relevant NGS and data sheets. 7. A written tabulation of all aerial control points with their respective alpha -numeric designations and horizontal and vertical coordinates. 160.10. Mapping Services to be Provided. The Surveyor shall provide the following mapping services as requested by the State: A. Aerial Photogrammetry The Surveyor shall prepare planimetric design (DGN), digital terrain model (DTM), and triangulated irregular network (TIN) MicroStation graphics files and orthophotography files covering the specific work location, meeting standards and specifications. as required. B. Mobile and Aerial Lidar The Surveyor shall prepare planimetric design (DGN), digital terrain model (DTM), and triangulated irregular network (TIN) MicroStation graphics files covering the specific work location, meeting standards and specifications as required. C. Mapping Tasks to be Completed The Surveyor shall perform the following tasks as requested for each mapping service. Horizontal and Vertical Control for Aerial Mapping a. The Surveyor shall prepare and submit an aerial ground control layout showing the proposed aerial ground control points, for approval by the State. b. The Surveyor shall establish and determine the coordinates of the aerial ground control points. c. The Surveyor shall establish and determine the elevations of the aerial control points. d. The Surveyor shall place aerial ground control target material at the established points and maintain until the photographs from the flight are approved. e. The Surveyor shall prepare, to scale, a survey control index sheet for the aerial control points. Page 36 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop f. The Surveyor shall be prepared to locate additional points, as determined by the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) certified Photogrammetrist, if any panel points are not visible from the air. 2. Deliverables for Horizontal and Vertical Control for Aerial Mapping The Surveyor shall provide the following deliverables: a. A final aerial control point layout showing the location of the points and labeled with their respective alpha -numeric designations. b. A plot and computer graphics of an B-size index map showing an overall view of the project and the relationship of primary monumentation and control used in the preparation of the project, signed and sealed by a RPLS, and as directed by the State. c. ..An A -size data -sheet -for each aerial ground -control point, which must include a location sketch, a physical description of the point, surface coordinates, the elevation, and datums used. d. A USB flash drive containing the graphics files and scanned images of the control data sheets. e. A written statement describing the datum used along with copies of all relevant NGS and data sheets. f. A written tabulation of all aerial control points with their respective alpha -numeric designations, surface coordinates (for center panel points only), and elevations. 3. Prepare Planimetric and DTM Data The Surveyor shall perform the following tasks for each requested mapping service: a. The Surveyor shall provide low altitude aerial mapping to cover an area 1,200 feet wide centered on the roadway unless otherwise specified, with cross flights as directed by the State. The Surveyor shall follow all standards and specifications in accordance with established guidelines and recommended or approved by the State. b. The Surveyor shall prepare planimetric design (DGN), digital terrain model (DTM),. and triangulated irregular network (TIN) Bentley MicroStation graphics files and orthophotography files covering the specific work location, meeting standards and specifications as required.. (1) The Surveyor shall collect supplemental planimetric and .DTM survey data. (2) The Surveyor shall update aerial 2D and 3D mapping with ground surveys. (3) The Surveyor shall maintain the current DGN level structure and legend used by TxDOT. (4) The Surveyor shall maintain the current DTM level structure and legend used by TxDOT. (5) The Surveyor shall use file features and level structures in compliance with TxDOT's current photogrammetry mapping legend. (6) The Surveyor shall locate, and field check random points. c. The Surveyor shall conduct quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for each task performed and prepare a Surveyor's Report. 4. Deliverables for Planimetric and DTMs Page 37 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop The Surveyor shall provide the following: a. Certification that the photographs or LIDAR imagery were taken on the date indicated, signed by the airplane pilot or aerial photographer. b. The DGN, DTM, and TIN files on a medium and in a format acceptable to the State, delivered on USB flash -drive or hard -drive. (1) Orthophotography (created using the DTM) delivered on USB flash drive, or hard -drive in tiff format (3 banded) with world files. (2) TxDOT's photogrammetry mapping legend and supplements. c. A tabulation showing the field -check points. d. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QAIQC) and Statement of Map Accuracy. -(1) • .. Statement of map accuracy. (2) A surveyor's report signed and sealed by an RPLS. 150.11. Horizontal And Vertical Control (15.3.5). This includes the establishment of horizontal and vertical control for survey projects. A. Overview of Horizontal and Vertical Control A horizontal control survey is performed for the purpose of placing geographic coordinates of latitude and longitude on permanent monuments for referencing lower levels of surveys. A projection is used to place the coordinates on a plane of northing and easting values for simplified measurements. Scale and elevation factors are applied to make the distance measurements applicable to the exact location on the working surface and the type of projection chosen is an "equal angle" type. A vertical control survey is performed for accurately determining the orthometric height (elevation) of permanent monuments to be used as bench marks for lower quality leveling. Spirit leveling is the usual method of carrying elevations across country from "sea level" tidal gauges. However, Global Positioning System (GPS) can be used indirectly but with less accuracy. Height measurements from the ellipsoid (as opposed to the "sea level" geoid) can be determined very accurately with GPS and only GPS. Trigonometric leveling, with a total station, is not acceptable for vertical control work. B. Definitions 1. BM means bench mark, which is a relatively permanent object whose elevation above or below an adopted datum is known. 2. CORS means continuously operating reference station, which is a network of the highest quality horizontal stations, forming the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS). 3. Control Survey means a survey providing positions (horizontal or vertical) of points to which supplemental surveys are adjusted. 4. Datum means a mathematical model of the earth designed to fit part or all of the geoid. 5. Datum Point Rod or Deep Rod Monument means a monument driven to refusal by a power driver, used for major project control. 6. GPS means the Global Positioning System, which is based on a constellation of 24 satellites orbiting the earth at a very high altitude. 7. Horizontal Control Survey means placing geographic coordinates of latitude and longitude on permanent monuments. B. Level 1 survey means RRP, CORS or major control densification. Page 38 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 9. Level 2 Survey means primary project control. 10. Level 3 Survey means secondary project control. 11. NGS means National Geodetic Survey 12. RRP means Regional Reference Point, which is a TxDOT Continuously Operating Reference Point. 13. Type II Monument means a disk driven onto a length of 5/8-inch rebar with the hole filled flush with concrete. 1.4. Vertical Control Surveys means a survey performed for accurately determining the orthometric height (elevation) of permanent monuments to be used as bench marks for lower quality leveling. C. Procedure for Horizontal and Vertical Control 1. The Surveyor shall establish horizontal and vertical control points, including offsite points. The Surveyor shall prepare signed survey control data sheets, a survey control index sheet, and a composite layout of the horizontal and vertical controls, and as directed by the County. 2. The Surveyor shall update existing control information and prepare new survey control data sheets, as directed by the County, to be included in the construction plan set as described in Item 150.11, D. D. Technical Requirements for Horizontal. and Vertical Control The Surveyor shall adhere to the following technical requirements. 1. Horizontal and vertical controls must be performed under the supervision of a RPLS currently registered with the TBPELS. 2. Horizontal ground control used for design surveys and construction surveys, furnished to the Surveyor by the County or based on acceptable methods conducted by the Surveyor, must meet the standards of accuracy required by the County. The Surveyor shall comply with the standards of accuracy for horizontal control traverses, as described in the TxDOT Survey Manual or the TSPS Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, as may be applicable. 3. Vertical ground control used for design surveys and construction surveys, furnished to the Surveyor by the State or based on acceptable methods conducted by the Surveyor, must meet the standards of accuracy required by the State. The Surveyor shall comply with the standards of accuracy for vertical control traverses, as described in the TxDOT Survey Manual or the TSPS Manual of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Texas, as may be applicable. 4. Monuments The Surveyor shall install survey monuments for a horizontal and vertical control survey that are reasonably permanent and substantial. The monuments shall be easily identified and afforded reasonable protection against damage and or destruction. a. Offslte primary control points whether set by GPS or conventional survey methods must be set in pairs approximately 2000 feet apart outside of the project on side roads. Offsite points must be constructed approximately every 2 miles and set approximately 6 inches below natural ground and must be inter -visible between each pair of points. Page 39 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop b. Secondary control points must be set approximately 6 Inches below ground at a maximum distance of 1,500 feet apart. 5. Side shots or short traverse procedures for total stations used to determine horizontal and vertical locations must meet the following criteria: a. Short traverses and instrument setups for side shots must begin and end on horizontal and vertical ground control as described above. b. Standards, procedures, and equipment (e.g., GPS Equipment, l_iDAR, Total Stations) used must be such that horizontal locations relative to the control can be reported within the specification to allow the engineer to accurately create the design to the following limits: (1) Bridges and other roadway structures: less than 0.02 feet. (2) - Utilities and -improvements: less -than 0.2 feet. (3) Cross -sections and profiles: less than 0.2 feet. (4) Bore holes: less than 0.5 feet. c. Standards, procedures, and equipment (e.g., GPS Equipment, LiDAR, Total Stations) used must be such that vertical locations relative to the control may be reported to within 0.02 feet. 6. The Surveyor shall update existing control information and prepare new survey control data sheets, as directed by the County, to be included in the construction plan set as described below: a. The Surveyor shall prepare, sign, seal, and date a survey control index sheet and horizontal and vertical control sheets to be inserted into the plan set. b. The Surveyor shall prepare a survey control index sheet that provides an overview of the primary project control and must include: (1) An unscaled vicinity map showing the general location of the project in relation to nearby towns or other significant cultural features. (2) A scaled- project map showing the extents of the project and the location of the primary control points. The map must show street networks, selected street names, control point identification, and significant culture features necessary to provide a general location of the primary control. (3) A table containing the primary control point values including the point number, northing, easting, elevation, stationing, and stationing offset values. (4) Map annotation including a graphic scale bar, north arrow, and standard TOOT title block. The title block must contain a section for the district name, county, highway, and CSJ number. The title block must also contain a section for a Texas registered engineer to sign, seal, and date the sheet to include the following statement, "The survey control information has been accepted and incorporated into this PS&F. The Surveyor shall download the required format of the survey control index sheet from the TOOT website. (5) In the title block under the heading "Notes", identification of the horizontal and vertical datum on which the primary control is based with the date of the current adjustment, the surface adjustment factor used, and unit of measure. The surveyor shall, include a note stating that the coordinates are State Plane and a notation specifying either grid or surface adjusted coordinates. Page 40 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop E. Data Requirement The Surveyor shall perform post processing of field data, which will be reviewed by the County. Data processed by standard calculators, computers, and other business hardware and software normally maintained and used by the Surveyor will be considered acceptable. F. Tasks to be Completed The Surveyor shall perform the following tasks: 1. The Surveyor shall establish horizontal and vertical control points, including offsite points. The Surveyor shall prepare signed survey control data sheets, a survey control index sheet, and a composite layout of the horizontal and vertical controls, and as directed by the County. 2. The Surveyor shall set primary offsite control points in pairs, approximately 2 miles apart outside of the project area. 3. The Surveyor shall set secondary control points approximately 6 inches below ground at a maximum distance of 1,500 feet apart. 4. The Surveyor shall establish horizontal and vertical control from the TxDOT Virtual Reference Station (VRS) Network, and as directed by the County. 5. The Surveyor shall tie and tabulate horizontal and vertical control to other control points and datums in the vicinity established by other sources such as the National Geodetic Survey (NGS), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), TxDOT VRS Network, and as directed by the County. G. Deliverables The Surveyor shall provide the following: 1. A B-size plot and MicroStation graphics files of the index map showing an overall view of the project and the relationship of the primary monuments and control points established for the project, signed and sealed by a registered professional land surveyor (RPLS), and as directed by the County. 2. One A -size data.sheet for each control point which shall include, but need not be limited to, a location sketch, a physical description of the point, surface coordinates, the elevation, and the datum used. 3. A USB flash -drive containing the graphics files and scanned images of the control data sheets. 4. A written statement describing the datum used, signed and sealed by a RPLS, along with copies of all relevant NGS and TxDOT data sheets. ROADWAY 1 I 3.1. Utility Coordination. A. Utility Base Map The Engineer shall obtain information on existing utilities from utility owners and shall conduct investigations to identify and evaluate all known existing and proposed public and private utilities. The Engineer shall identify potential conflicts and attempt to minimize the potential adverse utility impacts in the preparation of the schematic design. The Engineer shall prepare a base map depicting the utility locations. The Engineer shall create and maintain a utility Page 41 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop conflict matrix along with a utility conflict exhibit through the duration of the contract identifying potential known conflicts. The format of the matrix and exhibit must be consistent with the latest version of the San Antonio District Utility Conflict Matrix and Utility Conflict Exhibit or other examples provided by the County. B. Utility Coordination The Engineer shall assist the County in conducting utility coordination meetings with utility companies, as required, to facilitate utility conflict identification and resolution. 1. The Engineer shall establish contact with all existing utilities within and adjacent to the project limits and set up utility coordination meetings to discuss concepts and options for design and construction. This process must also be extended to utilities that approach the County, regarding plans to install facilities within the project limits after the project has been initiated. 2. The Engineer shall establish and conduct workshop meetings, both individually with each utility and with all utilities that incorporate the County's project team to review and resolve conflicts. 3. The Engineer shall create agenda and exhibits for all coordination meetings as directed by the County. 4. The Engineer shall establish and promote the desired agenda and methodologies for utility construction within the project limits. This shall consist primarily of promoting the construction of utilities as a part of the highway contract. 5. The Engineer shall schedule and conduct a utility kick-off meeting to obtain more information on existing facilities within the project limits. Major utility facilities must be discussed and analyzed to avoid relocation, if possible. 6. The Engineer shall schedule and conduct milestone meetings (or as -needed meetings) with the County to coordinate the work effort and resolve problems. The Engineer shall prepare a written report of these meetings. The meetings must include review of the following: a. Existing facilities including major facilities to be avoided with the project, if possible b. Utility Conflict Matrix c. Utility Conflict Exhibit d. Long lead items that could potentially impact the schedule during PS&E C. Deliverables 1. Utility Conflict Matrix along with Utility Conflict Exhibit. The Utility Conflict Exhibit must be on 11x17 sheets and include callouts to indicate the conflict'ID#, utility owner, type of line (water, sewer, high pressure gas, etc.), material (if it is an AC pipe line), and size (if known). 2. Utility Contacts list in excel and pdf format 3. Utility. Summary to indicate major utility facilities or time sensitive items pertaining to i utilities that need to be addressed in PS&E. 163.2. Geotechnical Borings and Investigations A. The Engineer shall determine the location of proposed soil borings for bridge design, . . . embankment settlement analysis, retaining walls, slope stability pavement design in accordance with the latest edition of the TxDOT Geotechnical Manual and Pavement Deslgn Manual, as applicable. The County will review and provide comments for a boring layout submitted by the Engineer showing the general location and depths of the proposed borings. Page 42 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop Once the Engineer receives the County's review comments, the Engineer shall perform soil borings (field work), soil testing, and prepare the boring logs in accordance with the latest edition of the TxDOT. Geoeechnica/ Manual and the local TxDOT district's procedures and design guidelines. B. All geotechnical work must be performed in accordance with the latest version of the TxDOT Geotechnical Manual. All testing must be performed in accordance with TxDOT's Test Procedures, which are available at https://www.txdot.gov/business/resources/testina.htmi. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) test procedures may be used only in the absence of the TxDOT procedures. All soil classification must be done in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. C. If applicable, the Engineer shall perform any retaining wall analyses including the settlement analysis. This analysis must include the computation of the factor of safety for bearing capacity, global stability, overturning, and sliding. In addition, the Engineer shall include allowable bearing pressure, passive earth pressure, friction factor, settlement analysis (consolidation report), and lateral earth pressure for the retaining walls. D. If applicable, the Engineer shall perform soil borings, falling weight deflectometer testing (at intersections), dynamic cone penetrometer testing, pavement coring, piezometric readings, testing and analysis to include slope stability analysis, settlement analysis, and foundation design recommendations along proposed pavements, retaining walls, bridges, ponds, and embankments. E. The Engineer shall provide a signed, sealed, and dated geotechnical report that contains soil boring locations, boring logs, laboratory test results, generalized subsurface conditions, ground water conditions, piezometer data, analyses and recommendations for settlement and slope stability of the earthen embankments, skin friction tables, and design capacity curves including skin friction and point bearing. The skin friction tables and design capacity curves must be present for piling and drilled shaft foundation, as applicable. F. If applicable, the Engineer shall perform particle size analysis to include grain size distribution curves with D50 value for each cohesionless soil layer and a D50 grain size for a sample in the stream bed at the upstream face of the bridge in the upper 1-foot of the stream bed. In. addition, the Engineer shall provide -a-subsurface profile Including the following information: 1. Determining Moisture Content in Soil Materials (Tex-103-E) 2. Particle Size Analysis (Tex-110-E) including: a. Median Grain Size (D50) and percent clay (percent passing No. 200 sieve) b. Soil type based on grain dimensions of cohesionless materials 3. Liquid Limit (Tex-104-E) as required for clayey soils 4. Plastic Limit (Tex-105-E) as required for clayey soils 5. Plasticity Index (Tex-106-E) as required for clayey soils 6. USCS Soil Classification (Tex-142-E) as required for clayey soils In addition, the Engineer shall provide a subsurface profile including the -following information 1. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory -Compacted Soils (ASTM D1883) 2. Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil (ASTM D2166) 3. Hydraulic Conductivity of Coarse -Grained Soils (ASTM D2434) for granular soils 4. One -Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils (ASTM D2435) 5. Direct Shear Test -of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions (ASTM D3080) Page 43 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop 6. One -Dimensional Swell or Collapse of Soils (ASTM D4546, Method B) 7. Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials (ASTM D5084) for clayey soils 8. Laboratory Compaction Characteristics and Moisture -Density Relationship of Subgrade, Embankment Soils, and Backfill Material (Tex-114-E, Parts I and/or 11) 9. Triaxial Compression for Disturbed Soils and Base Materials (Tex-117-E) 10. Triaxial Compression Test for Undisturbed Soils (Tex-118-E) 11. Lime -pH Series of Treated Materials (Tex-121-E, Part III) 12. Potential Vertical Rise of Natural Subgrade Soils (Tex-124-E) 13. Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Undisturbed Soils (Tex-131-E) 14. Determining Sulfate Content in Soils (Tex 145-E) 15. Soil Organic Content Using UV Vis Method (Tex-148-E) G. The Engineer shall sign, seal, and date soil boring sheets to be used in the PS&E package. The preparation of soil boring sheets must be in accordance with a State's District standards. H. Foundation Studies: The Engineer shall coordinate with the County to determine the location of soil borings to be drilled along the proposed pavements, retaining walls, bridges, bridges, _embankments, and detention ponds. The soil borings must extend to a depth in accordance with the State's Geotechnical Manual. The Engineer shall provide a boring layout for the County's review and comment. Planned quantities of borings are as follows: Proposed Structure Approximate Location Number of Borings Proposed Depth ft Bride Class Culvert 2,000 ft east of SH 6 1 30 Bride Class Culvert 1,000 ft east of Rabbit Lane 1 30 Bride Little Wickson Creek 2 90 Bride Little Wickson Creek 2 90 Bride US 190/SH 21 3 90 Bride . ..Wickson Creek 2. 90 Bride Wickson Creek 2 90 Bride Steep Hallow Branch 2 90 Bride Steep Hollow Road 2 80 Bridge Class Culvert 3,500 ft south of Steep Hollow Road 1 30 Bride Brushy Creek 2 90 Bride Brushy Creek 2 90 Bride Brushy Creek 2 90 Bride Near William D Fitch Parkway 2 90 Bride Carters Creek 2 90 Bride Carters Creek 2 90 Retaining Walls US 190/SH 21 and -Steep Hollow Road 6 35 Ponds As Needed Along Alignment 10 30 Pavements Along Entire Alignment (Approximate Spacing = 1,600 feet 66 10 Existing Pavements Intersections Along Alignment 14 total 32 10 Total 144 3,390 I. The Engineer shall incorporate soil boring data sheets prepared, signed, sealed, and dated by the geotechnical engineer overseeing the work. The soil boring sheets shall be in accordance Page 44 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop with the State's WINCORE software, which is available on the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) website. J. Pavement Design: The Engineer shall prepare permanent pavement designs for this project in accordance with the latest edition of TxDOT's Pavement Manual and the Bryan District's Pavement Design Standard Operating Procedure The Engineer shall submit a signed and sealed pavement design report to the State. The pavement design report must be reviewed and approved by the State prior to its implementation. The pavement design report must document assumptions and design considerations. The pavement design report must include the following: 1. Cover sheet with highway designation, district, county, project control -section -job (CSJ) number, geographical limits, and signatures of persons involved in the preparation and approval 2. Existing and proposed typical sections 3. Solis map of the project area with a brief description of each type of soil located within the project area 4. Design input values and output 5. Conclusion consisting of recommended pavement design or designs based on the data, analyses, and procedures included In the report. 6. Pavement design details specified for each location that includes structural layer materials, general specifications, and layer thicknesses 7. Site conditions that might influence the design and performance of pavements 8. Relevant geotechnical data and drainage requirements including boring logs, laboratory soil test results, active or passive drainage system design, pavement coring and report log (up to 10-foot depth), and soil classifications with Atterberg limits 9. Results of the field explorations 10. Recommended pavement designs for new pavements 11. Design criteria used'in determining, pavement designs; including traffic loads, pavement material characterization, environmental conditions, and pavement design fife 12. Design summary from the program used to design (e.g., FPS 21, DARWin, TxCRCP-ME, MODULUS 7.0) 13. Life -cycle cost analysis, as required by TxDOT's Pavement Manual, including the periods for resurfacing, reconstruction, and other rehabilitation measures and what these activities are likely to entail 14. Traffic control plans required for subsurface geotechnical and pavement investigations 15. Other considerations used in developing the pavement designs, including subgrade preparations and stabilization procedures. If applicable, the Engineer shall Incorporate the pavement design developed by the State. If the pavement design is not available, the State may request the Engineer perform pavement design and submit to State for review and approval. K. Deliverables 1. Preliminary Pavement Design Report 2. Geotechnical Report 3. DGN flies containing drilling log data from Geotechnical analysis Page 45 of 45 Exhibit A Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop EXHIBIT B ADDITIONAL SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE ENGINEER INNER LOOP SH 6 to W.D. FITCH CSJ: TBD Engineer shall provide the necessary engineering and technical services for the preparation of plans, cifications, and estimates (PS&E) for the construction of the new location arterial Inner Loop East. The ect will be prepared in conformance with state and federal requirements. The construction plan sets shall tain the drawings, details, and applicable standards required to describe the grading, paving, drainage, ctures, signing, pavement. marking, delineation., sequence.of construction, and traffic control for this struction project. The project will also require a TxDOT approved pavement design, additional SUE ;stigations, and preparation of ROW maps and deed descriptions, in accordance with the TxDOT approved ematics and environmental documents described in Project 1. ler subsequent work authorizations, the engineer may provide some or all the following: • Right -of -Way Mapping and Acquisition, including, but not limited to, testimony at eminent domain proceedings, • Conflict analysis for utility relocation plans and Utility Adjustment Coordination (UAC) • Construction phase services, including, but not limited to, preparation of change orders, review of shop and fabrication drawings, schedule analysis and participation in project meetings,'as requested by TxDOT. ENGINEER will be the single point of contact between the County and all contractors/subcontractors and review, all work performed, coordinate and conduct all meetings, and prepare and submit all project reports documents. Page 1 of 1 Exhibit B Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23.600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop Prime Provider: Quiddity Engineering LLC Project: Inner Loop County: Brazos SUBTOTALS Quiddity AmaTerra CIvIICorp CD&P OR Colan CPBY (SN) Terracon Westwood FC 102 (110) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ 6,110,231.50 $ 5,485,969.50 $ 64,162.38 $ 560.099.62 Other Direct Expenses $ 197,414.95 $ 179,979.70 $17.435.25 Total Unit Cost $ FC 120 (120) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ 926,027.98 1$ 128,573.84 $ 199,648.77 $ 298,824.38 $ 298 980.99 Other Direct Expenses $ 88,932.001 $ 70,177.00 $ 18,755,00 FC 130 (130) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ 758,739.41 $ 133,282.43 $ 585,629.98 $ 39,827.00 Other Direct Expenses $ - 33 964.00 $ 23,309.00- $ 10,655.00 Total Unit Cost $ 134 105.00 $ 134.105.00 FC 145 (164) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ 1,159,716.86 $ 815,434.12 $ 27,759.20 $ 80,46OA0 $ 39.555.66 $ 23 952.00 $ 65,218.88 $ 38,258.82 $ 69 077.88 Other Direct Expenses $ 13 615.00 $ 13,015.00 FC 180 (150) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ 120,061.73 $ 120,061.73 Other Direct Expenses $ $ - Total Unit Cost $ 74 000.00 $ 74 000.00 FC 160 (160) Total Labor Cost (Lump Sum) $ Other Direct Expenses $ FC 160 (161) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ Other Direct Expenses $ FC 160 (162) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ Other Direct Expenses $ FC 160 (163) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ 826,351.53 $ 107,117.48 $ 271,431.00 $ 447,803.05 Other Direct Expenses $ 232 565.05 $ 232.566.05 Total Unit Cost $ 526 227.00 $ 526,227.00 FC 160 (166) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ - Other Direct Expenses $ FC 160 (170) Total Labor Cost(Lump Sum $ Other Direct Expense $ FC 300 (351) Total Labor Cost $ Other Direct Expense TOTAL LABOR COSTS LUMP SUM $ 9,901,129.00 $ 6,790,439.09 $ 227,407.97 $ 937,521.38 $ 338,379.94 $ 63,779.00 $ 428,362.25 $ 486.061.87 $ 629,177.50 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES LUMP SUM $ 566.491.00 $ 179,979.70 70.177.00 $ 23.309.00 $ 18,755.00 $ 10,055.00 $ 13,615.00 $ 232 565.05 $ 17,435.25 TOTAL UNIT COST 734,332.00 74,000.00 - 134,105.00 - - 526,227.00 $ - rand Totals $ ,2 1,95 .0 $ 7,0 8.79 $ 297,584. 7 094.935.381 $ 357,134.94 $74,434.00 441,977.25 $1,244,8 3.92 $646,612.76 Percentage 62.9% 2.7% 9.8% 1 3.2% 0.7% 3.9% 11.1% 5.8 0 Summary Page 1 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop "VM 77, R QTHEK:DIRI� �XfENSEaa. Tt-- E.� N,r ? Title Report (lot/block) EA 0-, $33,000.000 Title Report (acreage) EA --..$450-.006.:-. $83,250.000 Lodging/Hotel - Taxes and Fees day/person $3,600.000 Lodging/Hotel (Taxes/fees not included) day/person 8 $7,840.000 MealsJ$13 Breakfast, $15 Lunch, $26 Dinner, $5 Incidental) daylperson $4,720.000 Mileage mile '$0: 55 -�-J$37AQ�*, "f%,� $22,099.700 Tolls day $50.000:..... $10,400.000 Rental Car Fuel gallon $750.000 Rental Car (includes taxes and fees; Insurance costs will not be reimbursed) day $1,000.000 Air Travel - In State - 2+ Wks Notice (Coach) Rd Trlp/person .00. `1 4 $4,500.000, PVoTs (Color on on per sq. ft. $8,820.000 f.'PNCTI0N.,P, DESIGN %Mg-Y"-.�ANp, .GQNPTRYPTI E.. ;QUANTITY '�-"'E�177775TXL. TOTAL' Ground Target (includes paint, panel material, etc.) each '$30.00 :':-:0 Mobilization for Aerial Photography/LIDAR Fixed Wing Aircraft (includes aircraft, pilot, camera/LIDAR operator, fuel, and transportation cost) per project 0 Fixed Wing Airborne UDAR - Project Flight Miles (On project flight miles) per mile Fixed Wing Airborne LIDAR - Transit Miles (including turn, maneuver miles and local airport to project) per mile "k$65 _- '0 D'-r Aerial Photography - Airborne GPS/IMU Data collection/Processing per project 2,500.00 !'� I Aerial Photography - Project Flight Miles On project flight miles)_ per mile Aerial Photography - Transit Miles (including turn, maneuver miles and local airport to project) per mile �77".... Mobilization for LiDAR Mobile Mapping System (travel to project) per mile - 777 7 707 0 1. FUNCTI 1-40) -.;DE.SIGN SURVEY,'AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEY .QN,CODE'160'( - : ": ''." , -, I UNIT COT NIT. T4 A -' '%ANTITY ,'T.0TAL 2-Man Crew Primary Control HR , 260boo'!1i'5 0-117filo.j $29,000.000 Secondary Control HR 00100C.I..: $25,000.000 Aerial Control HR $20,000.000 a. —"Btx —T7-4,000.00 Quiddity Cost Page 6 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Englneeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop AmaTerra Fee Page 7 of 32 Exhibit C Prime provider: Exhibit C -Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineecting LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project I Inner Loop 7- COW asL . ..... — 3. crvilGorp -7 4. GF&Y 77777777777 7 7 5. OR Colan 11. Terracan T. Vvesumod B.M eac, Adnftstratbon 1-32- 32 U 1-lMeaungs -7776777 --7-- 40 —'1 121 C RACT PER HOUR OTALLAH TS Ul SUnON 0 STAFFING 3 27.759.20 100.00 'AS74D 31 128.70 4fiv 73 22 3 ve; ;-V5,78 $ �Z?- 053.1 5 $ 1 Vm 1,12.034, 3 $ - !- SUBTOTAL - FC 145 (14% 1641 27.75920 W, F FLING ONCODE 120 120) -SOCWJECONIENV STUDIES S 1.487.10 2.831.40 13,899.60 69,647.12 S 33388.32 S 39468.00 1,837.80 1 $ 17,824,00 F 8.512.00 1 5 5.253.6I w 11.U[U--4 1 :b Z,Ubb.bu I S I =.68 199.648.77 lCONTRACTE11M)ONAMID PE s 27,759.20 $ $ S 27.7592W 0 IbUkS 10 1 AL LA90K EXPENbLZ 529945.30 1 52,831.40 S 13,899.60 S 59,647.. ; 33,388.32 $ 39,465.01 1,537.50 1 $17,624.09 5 d.B12.00 1 $5,293.61 $ 11.570.54 1 $2,055.50 1 $ 1,233.6e 1 $2Y7.407.9 1 AmaTerra Fee Page 8 of 32 Exhlit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop MA,-'NAGtNG:.-C.,PIRTRAC,TlkP/QQNAT..E 1, 7; 7.�� %mo i, OTHER DIRECT EXPEN%5E S. UNIT' FIXEDOOST" `MAX `7,�'-QUANTI T QUANTITY T, L-:�,'.,,,t Mileage mile $0.655 3000 $1,965.00 Lodging/Hotel - Taxes and Fees day/person $45.00 160 $7,200.00 Lodging/Hotel (Taxes/fees not included) day/person $98.00 160 $16,680.00 Meals (Excluding alcohol & tips) (Overnight stay required) daylperson $59.00 178 $10,502.00 Rental Car (includes taxes and fees; Insurance costs will not be reimbursed) day $100.00 6 $600.00 Rental Car Fuel gallon '$5.00 60 $300.00 Toll Charges day $50.00 10 $500.00 Photocopies BM (8 1/2" X 11 each $0.15 200 $30.00 Photocopies Color (8 1/2" X 11 each $1.00 200 $200.00 Curator (Drawer & TX Archaeological Research Lab for artifacts & report) each $4,000.00 0.5 $2,000.00 TARL Curation Fee site $5,000.00 0.5 $2,500.00 Environmental Field Supplies (fatties, stakes, flagging, spray paint, etc.) day $35.00 40, $1,400.00 RTK Base Radio hour $30.00 80 $2,400.00 GPS Receiver Rate hour $30.00 80 $2,400.00 Backhoe Rental 1 dax $1.500.00 15 $22,500.00 1 $70,177.00. AmaTerra Costs Page 9 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop — "' T5�246:10 E'"'23270 $ 187:39 —5"'158:1T' 1 4 t " 12D,00 111 113.54 3 • 121. 08.5 126.31 .60 TASK DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER SENIOR ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER DESIGN ENGINEER UTILITY ENGINEER SENIOR UTILITY COORDINATOR UTILITY COORDINATOR ENGINEER IN TRAINING SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN ENGINEERIGSENIORCAOD TECHNIN OPERATOR CADD OPERATOR TOTAL COMMENTS FUNCTIO14 CO E 130 0— RIGHT-OF-WAY DATA INVESTIGATION 130.1. Right• - ay Surva (15,1.1) ' 130.2. mg - a Ma Dlnq—Tradil(onal ROW Map 130.3. Slate Land Surve trig (15.5.1) 130.. ROW Hoaxing Services 130.5. Utility Engineerm rive galion A. utility uall Levels (QL . Quality Level D External Communication (correspondence, phone conversation, etc.) for each of the follovdng utility owners: B a.b. a 16 34ne 18 B 34 c. Frontier 1 1 8 16 B 34 d. Next 1 .1 is a 34 O.Oplimum 1 1 - 0 16 B 34 f. Earth in 1 1 .. 0 16 6 34 g. Atmos Pipeline 1 1 B 16 8 34 h. Energy Transfer 1 1 B to 34 i, Lvilson CreekSpecial Utility District 1 1 0 16 34 1, Enterprise Frocucts 1 1 8 18 0 34 k. Magellan 1 1 B 10 B 34 I. Northliold Enterprises 1 0 16 8 34 in. Wildfire Energy Midstream 1 1 a 16 B 34 n,ExxonMobilPipeline 1 1 0 6 34 O. Entergy 1 1 e 16 B 34 .Localentities 4 2 B 18 B 38 2. Quality Level C - OMITTED 3. Quati level 0 ExteMa communication (Correspondence, phone conversation, etc.) for each of the fallowing utility owners: a. Bryan Texas Utif Iles BTU 1 1 4 4 10 b. AT&T 1 1 4 4 10 c. Frontier 1 1 4 4 10 d. Next 1 4 4 10 e.Opbmum 1 4 4 0 1. tink 1 1 4 4 10 q. Atmos Pipeline 1 1 10 h. Energy Transfer 1 1 4 4 Wilson umex Special Utility District 1 1 4 4 1 10 EntarpasO Products 1 1 4 10 kMagetan 4 4• 10 I. N011itilteld ante rises 1 1 4 4 10 m. Wildfire ar erg Midstream 1 1 4 4 10 a Exxon obi Pf aline 1 1 4 4 10 o. oral entitles 1 1 4 4 10 4. Quality Level A- t0 soots 2 2 - 4 4 4 16 0. Utility Investigations Melhodology 1. Utility Investigation QuaG Level a. Work site visit r Fieb reconnaissance 24 24 1 24 24 24 120 b. Develop work plan for County Approval 4 a 8 16 24 60 e. Review and compile a list of data sources 4 4 B B 24 1. Exialing records 2a 4 0 144 it. Oral recollections 12 12 24 4 96 li, Locations marked by DIGTESS 8 32 24 24 80 Iv. Data repositories 40 6 B 40 40 40 170 . Perform record research from all available resources 12 20 40 32 32 136 L Taxas011 4 4 8 B 24 a. Railroad Comm ssion of Texas(Texas RRC) Is 16 16 48 I. Verbal recolloction 32 40 40 4 552 iv. As -built information from plans B 12 32 32 72 72 64 64 354 v. Plats 6 24 3 40 166 vl. Permits 12 24 1B 18 40 24 24 —,so o. Document utility owners and contort Information 1 4 6 a 16 40 40 114 1. Create utidl drewin s al information athored 6 0 40 48 56 138 182 0 8 2. UUf Investigation ua i Leve C OmiOed . Designate (QuaUI Level El)a. Compile -as-buf r to ormat on from plans, plats, and other location data 2. 1 4 1 1 a 8 8 8 38 CivilCorp Fee Page 10 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost, Project 1 Inner Loop b.Request Right of Entry In accordance to General Re uireman, Section 1 A of this Attachement C 16 16 32 32 96 c. Coordinate ranto tie utilities to project survey datum 16 16 16 48 d. Coordinate with utility owners, when utility owners policy Is; to designate their own facilities at no cost for preliminary survey pu oses; 2 4 18 16 38 e. Designate, record, and mark me horizontal location of existing utility facilities ' 1. Use active and passive scans to locale any additional utilites, Including unrecorded and abandoned storm and sanitary sewer facilities. - -- g. Prepare and deliver a color -coded composite signed and sealed utility facility plan 2 4 16 32 64 128' 246 It. Determine the approximate electronic utility depths at critical location. I. Provide monthly summary and verify compliance with agreed work schedule 12 12 24 .Close-0ul ermits as required 2 4 8 8 8 30 k. Identify a I utiles from OL D Investigation that cannot be depicted by QLB 2 4 1 4 .8 8 8 34 I. Comply with all applicable TxDOT policy and procedural manuals. 4 4 ": .' . 8 8 i 24 4. Subsurface Utility Locate (Test Hoe) Service (Quality Level A) (Estimate 10 Test 'Holes) a. Review test hole location and advise County 4 4 8 It 6 - 32 i. Determine number of test holes - 6 8 16 16 48 It. Determine locations of test holes 6 16 16 16 56 iii. Request Right of Entry .4 4 a 8 24 b. Coordinate with Survey 2 4 15 16 38 t. Tie utilit location to project survey datum 2 2 4 4 1 8 8 28 iL.Pre ere, review, and document test hole data sheets 2 4 8 8 24 24 24 94 a Coordinatew th uUli owner inspectors 8 8 16 d. Place Texas 811 ticket 48 hours prior to excavation 1 4 4 4 4 16 HOURS SUB -TOTALS - 126 190 240 106 380 376 564 B60 404 446 4280 CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR '$ 248.10 $ ' - 232.75 S 187.33 - $ 156.11 $- `` 174.00 $' 162.00. S> 120.00 - S 1.13:54. $- ` 121.34` .57 S "108.5T .31 S 128:31 $ -<r"' 96.50: ' TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 31,260.60 $ 44.222.50 $ 44,959.20 $ 16.859.88 $ 66,120.00 $ 57.152.00 $ 67.680.00: $ 99,91520 $ 49.021.36 $ 35,913.80 $ 28.293A4 $ 43.232.00 $ 585,629.98 % DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 2.94% 4A4% 5.61% 2.52%1 8.88% 8.79% 13.18% 20.56% 9A4% 7.94% 523% 10.47% SUBTOTAL - FC 130 130 5585,628.98 COMMENTS TASK DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER SENIOR ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER DESIGN ENGINEER UTILITY ENGINEER SENIOR UTILITY COORDINATOR UTILITY COORDINATOR ENGINEER IN TRAINING SENIORENGINEERING ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN TECHNICIAN SENIOR CADD OPERATOR CADD OPERATOR CONTRACTEDIDONATED PE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AND XIOMINVIRTION _ 145.1.CenUact Management and Administration A. Project Management 72 46 120 1. AmaTera 2. CDBP 3. civilcorp 4. CP&Y 5.OR Colon 6. Teraron 7. Westwood B. Project Administration 40 1 a. - 52. 100 C. Project Meetings 72 72 1 1 144 HOURS SU18-TOTALS SUB-TOTALS 1841 128 52 364 CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR 248,10 232.T5 $ `187.33 156:11 `174,00 152.00 20.00 113: $ 121.34-, -908.57 $ 126,31 96.50'. TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 45,650.40 $ 29,792.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,018.00 $ 80,460.40 DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 50.55%1 35.16%1 1 14.29% SUBTOTAL - FC 145 (145,1641 $ 8046040 TASK DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER SENIOR ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER DESIGN ENGINEER UTILITY ENGINEER SENIOR UTILITY COORDINATOR UTILITY COORDINATOR ENGINEER IN TRAINING SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN SENIOR CADD OPERATOR CADD OPERATOR TOTAL COMMENTS FUNCTION CODE 16D 163 - MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY ClvilCOrp Fee Page 11 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID. No. CIP 23.600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop 103.1. Utility Coordination - A. Ulilit Baso Ma 1. O fain nformation on ox shn utilities Conduct Investigations to identify all known utilities 2 24 24 32 24 24 130 Identify potential conflicts in accodance to SUE QL D and A only 4 24 32 48 48 ISO . Prepare base map depicting utility locations in accordance to SUEQLDBAonI 4 8 24 32 3'l 100 5. Create an malntaln a utility Conflict Matrix (UCM) and utility conflict exhibit 16 24 32 •72 144 B UtilityCoordination Schematic Phase 4 8 8 16 32 32 32 32 32. 288 1. Assist the County in conducting utility coordinellon meetings a. Establishcontact w t e ex st ng uti ides w th n and dd'acent to the pro act limits B 8 18 18 48 Setup uti ity coordination meetings to discuss design and construction concepts B 8 18 16 16 64 . Establish an conduct war shop meetings with utlltly cam soles to rev ew and resolve conflicts. 4 12 40 40 32 128 3. Create a soda antl.e i ils for all coordination meetings 2 4 1 40 32 72 166 4. Establish and promote the desired agenda and methodologies for utility construction 2 8 24 32 32 98 S. Schedul and conduct a utIlIty kl&-orf meeting 2 2 8 8 20 6. Schedule and conduct milestone meetings with the County. Pre are ro ens or 4 4 4 4 16 o. Existin lacilitlbs ncludin major facilities to be avoided a B a 16 4 b. Utlli Conflict Matrix 6 1 • 3 4 104 c. 701it Can lief xhl it 4 10 18 48 48 80 214 d. onp lead items let could potentially mpact scliedulo during PSB.E 2 4 4 4 B 22 C. el very es 1. Obtain Information on eyisfing utilities 2 8 40 40 Be . Conduct Investigations to Identify all known ulilitles 24 24 24 24 96 -TG&2.UtIIIty Design 8 24 24 24 60 40 183.3. Retaining Walls and Miscellaneous Structures ' 163.4. Traffic Control Plan, Detours, and Secluence of Construction 163.. em ore rat c Signals and Illumination 103.6. Illumination 163.7'.-§tormWatorPolluUonProvenhon tans S 163.0. am ute andTabulate Quantil as 103.9. S ecial utilityDetails(water. Sanitary Sewer, etc. 163.10. Miscellaneous Structural Details 183.12. Testimony for Right of Way Hearings 163.13. Estimate 153.14. Contract time determination 163.15. Specifications and General Notes 15 . . Constructa i ity Review 163.17. scrioaullng and Trackin 163.18. Deliverables 163.2. Geotochnlcal 6orin sand nvostl alions Exploration Planning an xoculion Project Coordination, Planning, an Internal Progress Meelin s Review Extsbn niormalion Pro arin Borin Location and Field Invosti anon Sala Plans e action Of Standard TraKc Uontrol Pans or Bonnas Coordination with Project Team and County for Approval of Boring Locallon Plans Communication with Property Owners to Coordinate Silo Visit and Exploration Schedules Site Visits to Assess Access and Stake Baring Locations Utility Clearance for Borings coordination with coring. Drilling, refllc Con ro , Survey, and Non- Destructive Testing Crowe . a y Travel, Borehole Logging, and Quality Assurance o e d Ex loration Site Safety Chock -Ins During Field Work Collection at Piezometna Readings 22 locations, month y readings for 24 months ' Laboratory Testing and Data Re onin Sample Inventory and Rev ew or Laboratory Tesl n and Coordinate LaboratoryTestingAssignments and Vare ew o Teat Results Preparation of soil Boring Logs (W ncoro), Pavement Core Logs, and DCP Test Results Preparation of 0oflng Location a s Preparation Of Geotechnlcal Data Report CivilCorp Fee Page 12 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeedng LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop Review and Comment on Brine and Retaining Wall La -. •. '. R Develop Bridge Foundation Capacity Curves. LPILE Parameters, and Design Recommendations 7 bonn ..... -: ....:. • .. z '. " - - `.... - - - Develo Bridge Foundation Construcdon Considerations ' •. _ - .. :..' ��:.... ,.• ;rct=. .s ; - - - D p Sag Parameters and Geometric Models for Embarilment and Retaining WallAnaiysaswc,„.,. r..,--, . ..-.;;. _. ,..,, - ..... -�.,. , ...,.,......->, > ,..:«• , , . _ ::,, , _ a . - s _ ' Perform Anaysis for Fmbanlmlent / Retaining Wag Settlement•. Global, and External Stability IS borings) Develop Recommendations for Retaining Wall ReRF.rcmnent Lengins and Ground lmprovementRegurrements 5� - - .-- �..---�, _ -• ' � •., ,.- ' - s .�� - .-�. `� - •�• - Develop MSE DD Sheets SF_. Develop Bridge Class Cu en Design Recommendations and ConshvctionConsidoations borbe s - :.._-'.. - ' °• �' -- `` -`-• -- <te ; �- - -- - - - _ - Perform An for Pond S SbDi 10 bottans -.... - Pre rbt Sail Bode Data Sheets .. :.. - .. .. _ .. .. .... ,; .. .- - Pre rayon of DreftGeateehnlral En need Re ..:� .. ' _-_ . _ ... -..;,..:• . , .•.,... -, ..:.�, :. .....� _:.. , ..:-•. -..: .. .> :..: - • - Preparation of Final Geolechmcal Engineering Report - Pavement Design and Reporting - Perform Visual condition Assessment at Cross-Sbeats •... ._ r:. : _ .. ;. -." Process and Review FWD and DCP data .. - ....._ ..„r- - ,..• . :... .: ,_ :. - - _ _ _ Perform Potential Vertical Rise (PVR) Cations and Develop PVR Mitigation Strategies -r8-._ - >s. c ... -. _� r ' ..�:.=� .,: -=i ...:. -" r . ¢aa ...gin . Review Monitoring Well Data and Identify Potential Groundwater Imes ;__ �.. `�§ - :.. .-:.. ..;es, ,,,_s ,. .;. �;,. - ,. _»^ .•M .. F:.—: - Perform FPS 21 & TxCRCP ME calculations for Asphalt B Concrete Pavements`- - -- •- s:: - .. .: - .� .... - - -. ... .. Y - -• Prepare Permanent Pavement Design Options - .•- .:.. • - - - -: °.. .. �' -. a. Prepare Temporary Pavemen[Oesign Options - Coordmalo and Anand Pavement Design Conference with -.... - - 3:` Perform Life Cyda Cost Analysis to Evaluate Flerdbla and RigidAlternatives _ - - 3 Preparation of Draft Pavement Design Report : '�: :. - -- :. - :.. `- ...: = - •-:':� - ' Preparation of Final Pavement Design Report =,.. .. -::... ..a ..;.. ^ ...._..:.. _ >;-.. -,-:. _+ .. '• -- - .�....-,. HOURS SUB -TOTALS 1 40 84 64 48 160 240 264 420 128 152 144 296 ZD40 CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR "'`"0857 g $ TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 9.524.00 $ 19.551.00 $ 11.989.12 7.49328 27.840.00 36.480.00 $ 31,680.00 $ 47,6080 $ 15.531.52 1d52 18.188.64 1 $ Z6:554.00 $ 271A31.O0 , %DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING I I.UW)61 4.IZ%l 3.147b 2.35% 7.84%1 11.16% 1 12-94%1 20.5v%I 62T% 7.45-lol 7.067. 14.51% t)BTOTAL - FC 160 163 $271 A31.00 FUNCTION CODE 130 (130)-RIGHT-OF-WAY DATA $ 44.222.50 15 44.95920 16,859.8E 1 $ 86,120.00 I Z5 57.152.00 I $ ut.tm0.00 I 5 g9.9152D 1 $ 49.021.38 36,914mu 4, 8.zw." $ 43,23200 I $ 585.629.98 FUNCTION CODE 145 (145. 164) -MANAGING CONTRACTED/DONATED PE ;;;]S31.260.60 S 45,650.40 $ 29.792.00 $ $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ 5,018.00 $ 80.460A0 - 9.924.0 19.551.UU 11.989.12 1 5 1A9328 27,840.00 I zi 3Q460.00 1 5 31,580.00 1 $ 47,686.80 I$ 15.W1.52 15,51JZ54 $ 18.1138.54 28,554.110 Z11.431.00 $86,835.00 $93,565.50 1 $56,948.32 1 $24.353.16 1 $ 93,960.00 15 93,632.00 1 $ 99,360.01) 5147,602.00 1$ 64.552.88 1 $ 53,416.44 $ 45.482.08 1 $76.014.00 $937.521.38 CIvIICorp Fee Page 13 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop C.IVILCORPUTIL�,. INVESTIGATION - Fq-�T OTHER DIKECT.,EXPENSES':--h UNIT-.- - -_RATE""` QUANTITY _POST$--,' Mileage Mile ,'$0.655 $ 750.00 Lodging/Hotel Taxes and Fees Day/Person ;-..$98:000 -24;!j;' $ 2,400.00 Meals (Excluding alcohol & tips) (Overnight stay required) Day/Person !"159000 $ 1.344.00 Air Travel - in State - 2+ Wks Notice (Coach) Rd Trip/Person 4530000 $ Parking Day 'Y-'$30;'000 30.00 Rental Car (includes taxes and fees; .Insurance costs will not be reimbursed) Day 4100:660, $ 100.00 Rental Car Fuel Gallon .$5 .0 $ 5.00 Traffic Control Services, Arrow Boards and Attenuator trucks - (Includes labor, equipment and fuel) Day 6 00 '3: $15,450.00 Environmental Field Supplies Day CDIDVD Each $ Photocopies BM (11 " X i T) Each $0.25 $ 500.00 Photocopies BM (8 1/2" X I I Each '.2000 $ 300.00 Photocopies Color (11 " X 17") Each $1.25 600' $ 750.00 Photocopies Color (8 1/2" X I I Each .$I _0,Q -. 600,:: > $ 600.00 Map Records Each $ USB Stick Each SUBTOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES CMLCORP-,VTILITY. INVESTIGATION - FC 130 UNIT RATE,: * QUANTITY =="COSTS'll! SUE (Quality Level B) Power Lines (Transmission) (OH) $24,960.00 Lines (Distribution) (OH) _LF LF .$'1.96. .61700. $13,065.00 —Power Power Lines (Distribution) (UG) LF •.,,21000..' $3,900.00 Power Lines (Stree Lights) (UG) LF $1.95 -:..-300':-- $585.00 Power Lines (Traffic Signals) (UG) LF $1.95 ".600:"'.1:,. $1,170.00 Communication (OH) LF $12,090.00, Communication (UG) LF $V .95.:.:: $9,945.00 Water LF $1;90..: .2,1100:1.' $4,095.00 Wastewater LF $1.'05.: = 2,.100, $4,095.00 SUE (Quality Level A - Utility Locate, Test Holes) Level A: 0 to 5 ft. Each -.;3 $3,825.00 A: < 6 to 8 ft. Each _$4,875.00 —Level Level A: < 8 to 13 ft. Each T 72,000:. 7 $4,000.00 Level A: < 13 to 20 ft. Each 2.5QQ., $5,000.00 SUE Mobilization / Demobilization Mile $ •2606:"! $15,600.00 CIVIlcorp Costs Page 14 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project I Inner Loop Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Field Services Two (2) Person Survey Crew Hour 11,85;00': $16,650.00 Two (2) Designating Person with equipment Hour $205.00.'. $10,250.00 SUBTOTAL UNIT COSTS FC 130 $134,105.00 CivilCorp Costs . Page 15 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project I Inner Loop W1177 'Ml "I,iH % TASK DESCRIPTION PRINCIPAL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT MANAGER PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SPECIALIST PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT COORDINATOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR TOTAL COMMENTS FUNCTION COF)E�120(120)-;�-SOC[AUECONIENV STUDIM,, SOGIAJL�4--Y EN11M.STUDIMAND-FUSUG. iik,VOLVEMENT. a w il z 190 1 - Environmental Documentation Standards X, 120.2. Environmental Assessment (EA) Content and Format EnvironmentalStatement (EIS) Content and Format 120.3. En 7777.7777- W.. Mavc, T20.4. Environmental evaluation Form 120.5. Environmental Technical Anal F23 and Documentation A=.a ninon of technical an Y"s an aocumentation for environmental services S. Minimum Deliverables C. The exact environmental technical analyses and documentation must be determined at the work authorization level, but can Include: 1� S2%129 40 Evaluations. k�, anon Sac on 6(f) Evaluation 3. Environmental Public involvement (23 CFR §771.111) 4. Community Impacts Analysis induced Growm Imp—a-cTAR-aRysis and Cumulative Impacts Analysis 6. Air Quality Studies 7. Noise Analysis Technical Reporting aDocumentation 8. Water Resources Analysis and Qa11s 51010giCaVN8tUral as.,SrcF s anagemem Analysis and Documentation I U. Initial Site Assessment (ISA) with Hazardous Materials Project Impact Evaluation 11 a Archeological Ny= Services a. Prepare/submit archeological Background Study Antiquities ermit Application b. Prepare/submit P c. Perfom Archeological Intensive Survey, Reporting7a—mr— Curation g 12. Historic Resource Identification. Evaluation, and Documentation Services a. Prepare/submit historic resources project coordination requestf2R b. historic resource research design Perform c. Prepare/submit historic resource survey rerport 13. Floodplain Impacts 14. Stormwater Permits (Section 402 of the clean Water Act) % FC 120.5 Public Involvement base D opment and Updates, Communications Log Database 2 eve' 77.777777 7,7.� 7 -777 98 nt .7 Project Materials Development 25,I 65 Stakeholder Communications -4.8 J .48'. 96 PropertyOwnerMeetings and Documentation (up to 100) 51w4l �& 175. . -',;:--175 530 Stakeholder and Agency Meetings and Coordination (up to 20) 80; "ZI 80' ..... 160 Project Updates 35:.:.. 35-- 70 Public meetings (2 Public meetings and I Public Hearing..ss V . .... . ning and Logistics 60r 40 144 Meeting Notices and Promotion z;.6 i :. 30 :4— 60.. ..:F 40. 20 156 Public Meeting Materials (PPT, Maps. Exhibits, Handouts) 6 30w: :1 96 Virtual Meeting Production/Engagement Too[ 1: ]::1! K, 53 Dry Run 18 54 Meeting Preparation and Facilitation (up to 5 staff) -�.L '18-:, ii�,-: : : -: '; 120 CD&P Fee Page 16 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Englneeering LLC Method .of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop -summary Report and comment Responses (Up t0200 comments each meeting) 183 BDURTEU13-TO IALb 8 571 707 1 T211 96 3, 4w CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR -22 8.801. -49, f 140. $ �'� FV7�;4�1-21.01 f$ 7171�---0767 TOTAL LABOR COSTS 4,?330E68, $ 104.98 3 $ 50,945.21 $ 7,920.96 $ 298,824.3 % DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 0.99% :31.49% 39.640+/o 23.22% 5.30% SUBTOTAL FC 120 (120) 2-98,824.38 1 TASK DESCRIPTION PRINCIPAL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT MANAGER PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SPECIALIST PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT COORDINATOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS MANAOINO' C0NTkAXTED1D0NATEDPV— "g W, 4. CON TRAC T GE TAD AUMIN1ST RATION'.. 145.1.Conlract Management and Administration A. Pro M�sment 12. 24. 40 76 2. CD&P 3. CIv1ICorp, .CP&Y 5. OR Colan 6. Terracon .. ...... . . 777 7 7. Westwood B. Project Administration . . ...... .. C. Project Meetings -.48 144 72 136 220 —9-4 CONTRACT FWS PER HOUR 240.61,,d$, 228.80 s TOTAL ORT 2.88-7.32 16,473,60 20,194.64 $ $ % DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 5A5% 32.73% 61.82% SUBTOTAL - FC 145 (145,164) Is 39,555.55 1 330. 8 30,644.80 $ �104,982.43 $ 50.945.21 7,920.96 $ 298.824.38 $ 2,887.32 $ 16,473.60 $ 20,194.64 $ $ - $ 39,655.56 8.30$147,118.40 $ 125.1 7-7.07 -7 50,94-5.21 Ir —7,920.96 —$338,379.94 LABOR SUBTOTAL SUMMARY FUNCTION CODE 120 IQ U0IE,9 CONTRACTEDIDONATED PE lsukdsw AL LAtSUK t;A1-t:N*t:b7,2 CD&P Fee Page 17 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project I Inner Loop MANAGING ,I;QNTRACT,EPIDONA-TEP.P.9 5A64 OTHER- DIRECT, EXPENSES AAM �.A UANIM JOTALV4 Mileage Mile $0.655 2,000 $1,310.00 Corrugated Meeting Signs Foam Boards Each $75.00 45 $3,375.00 Postage Each $0.66 2,000 $1,320.00 Photocopies BIW (8.5xl 1) Photocopies B/W '(1 I X 17) Photocopies Color (8.5 X 11) Each $1.00 1,000 $1,000.00 Photocopies Color (11 X 17) Each $1.25 1,000 $11,250.00 Venue Rental (allowance for cleaning, deposits, etc.) LS $1,000.0() AV Equipment Rental Allowance LS $500.00 Court Reporter LS $500.00 Advertisements LS $5,000.00 Pdnt/Mall Service LS Virtual Engagement Platform LS $1,000.00 Videofflirtual Meeting Production/Editing Project Email Subscription LS $250.00 Project Hotline/Voicemall LS $250.00 Project Website (URL, Hosting, etc.) Direct Expenses Subtotal $18,755.00 CD&P Costs Page 18 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop UU*tV,.UA TASK DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER' RIGHT OF WAY AGENT GIS TECH APPRAISER TOTAL COMMENTS FUNCTION,CODE 130,(M� KIUK I -UI7-VVAY)iX,NM- 10*10% . .. V VKA -4Ik�,lk 130.1. Right -Of -Way Surveys (15.1.17 130.2. Right -Of -Way Mapping - Traditional ROW Map '166';: :1 V :,9 290 d. Place Texas 811 ticket 48 hours prior to excavation HOURS SUB TOTALS 30 66 166 19 9 290 CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR 7T77MW W-7-77N.,00, 200 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 6.48-0.00 $ 10,296.00 $ 19,256.00 $ 1,995.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 39,827.00 % DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 10.34% 22.76% 57.24% - 6.55% SUBTOTAL - FC 130 (130) $ 3.41 T8_.59_�_0.9_8 $0.47 $39,827.00 TASK DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER LIFPUTY PROJECT MANAGER RIGHT OF WAY AGENT GIS TECH APPRAISER TOTAL COMMENTS F,UNGT10N COUP- 145 (145 ANA ,164� 01NO O , d RAC. EDOONAT-Eb.'O NT Z, CONTRAG,T.MANAGEMENT'-AND.v'ADMINISTRATIOt,l,-.,-' 145.1.Contract Management and Administration A. Project Management r 2 1. AmaTerra 2. CD&P 3. CivilCorp 4.CP&Y 5. OR Colan _24.. 20 44 6. Terracon 7. Westwood B.- Project Administration 7 T 44 C. Project Meetings _i24 0 44 HOURS SUB TOTALS 56 76 132-* CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR 74F-7777,770 W irp.�7,771 56. 6 Q � -,;44 7, , 16:Q0_ 1.05- TOTAL LABOR COSTS ZOOM, $ 11,856.00 $ $ $ $ 23,952.00 % DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 42.42% 57.58% Ji, wX, - ,SUBTOTAL - FC 145_(145,164) . ... �23,952M LABOR SUBT5TAL,SUMMARN _�_19_,256.00 —1,800.00 , lk FUNCTION CODE 130 130) - RIGHT-OF-WAY DATA $ 6,480.00 $ 10,-29600 $ 11,990-01 $ 39,827.00 F= IUN L;L)L)t 140 (140,104) -MANAGING CONTRACTED/DONATED PE $ 12,096.00 $ 11,856.00 $ - -Fl-9,256.00 $ - -1—,99500 $ - $ 23,952.00 Su is I u I AL LABILIK t:AVftNt5hb -fl 8,57-6.00 22, 162 0-0 _$1,_80000 -6-3,779.00 ORC Fee Page 19 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project I Inner Loop ROADWAY DESIGN ESIGN'SURVEY 47 OTHERVRECTEXPENSES ;QUA V, WOW. Lodging/Hotel - Taxes and Fees day/person $0.00 Appraiser Market Study day/person $10,000.00 Meals (Excluding alcohol & tips) (Overnight stayrequired) day/person ...... $0.00 Mileage mile $655.00 SUBTOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES $10,655.001 ORC Costs Page 20 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider, Exhibit C • Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Coat Project 1 Inner Loop TAaKDESCRIPf10N QUALITY SENIOR ENVIRONMENT EL EN WENT SENIOR BIDL0019TN BIOL0019Tm BKILOGI9T YB SENIORGIOPERATOR Ore OPERATO AOMW TOTAL MANAGER ALPL AL PLANNER PLANNER PLANNER AL PLANNERNBIOLOGIST OPERATOR OPERATORJUMOROIS OPERATOR CLERICAL COMMENTS KOUT E N i - , :. �, ;.,>, .. ->.. :'n,t, :c.:..• ,.a OWna�•. tLPLANNE'R Bane auan om .....<.... .:... .... .:......_<.:....... ...... t o[roa a, tlo asan O antenant Avea oParcols fan ant. -; •• .. ' Na o W errs 1 Up — •'.:_ ._: <_• ,.., ....- •, ,.. ,.•• .•.' _ _ fig 7. - umed 14 bridges an Mna' mere F. dinars emenl CmNmabe .... ••. .' -... •+ .. •..: .. _ Cs. Dale eWor .. .... >,.. .... .... ... ,.._ :. ,,..._ ... ......_.._.: .. ..,: ......: ,. _ Rl hlof En 185baCtS '<...,.',w,.. .:. .. ... . 5. Bdd a Data - .. ... r +•, - :. ` . -..- - ,- - •. - s.. - Assumed revlew of fwo rid es from TXDOT GIS datsbas H1. . Roadwa Des n [}eerY .... .. •. - >. .: '.... .. , anti= Des ennv .. .. ,.". .... .. :...... .. ... . . 1f0.2.Sah UCUeda—Gewra Teak: ... .•. ..... ... •. :•:: :. _. ... .� -, ..-. .. .... ..... .... �'• .:.< -., .._,. A. ROW Pros se Ma .' '. :... .:.... .. .. .._.. ... ..... _ . Typical Setdonl .' .:. .:..: .. _ 4.:. :: ... ., to :.:: :: .<• :. '.2 - ...:: -. .,.. '...• .. :. ...... .7A' .6- 40. 114 C. EnNmtmen C.=. D. fmarmal Coaramatimr viNrkalllood labl atlminlstralor Bmzo .,.,:.:; '., .�,,, .. .:-..„:�... >x.:.. *t.. ....,s...-., ,><;.,- .. r,.:. ,, a,a„•}.,., .„d ..k:. ....... .. .: _.,:n-..... . ,.,: Dare Called- end Redew of survey. As bulb, FIS report! Ord r vrewe obtain ez rng m 9 m e prepared by oral agentl , FEMA Map Change Wormation, ea ovaMle modals and CAD files' .... ...::.: ,.. .,<..� s s.:--. •3+ x, ..«.x y' .<:.b-.. •, ,.,:.._.. <• .,. ,,: .:, - ., «� ai and FEMA BLE models -r s :., • .; , •. I .-: ay �xs AGassessmems or up a ran rot eastmgcon i Field Recowalsanas ......t' ' ,•.. .. _ > �: 'i ,..•,` .• - •. .: 'F� annd drains econddtons •:: t _ - , a ravage au o epp—t. crassings forup to two aegnmenls in mderto minfmizo Impact I=%DrainOutlaq "'.., .•, .... .;.. .. ... ....;, �. . r :,... �. '%_t: ,.. <.l .. a >,.. and need forROW i p a Creek and bautades, Thompaon'e Creek and Wbuadaa, Stec 1,- Houow Brondl,Barshy Creek, and Cesteys Creek Tributaries Overall Grenada A— Maora ... -..:.. ._�, ,.. Z.:' .... .. <. .: • .:...• -. .,. .,.,... .. .. - :.. .`a` w11ch IS dmalel 151ar er uossi t r A delineations fix, up to 2S minor rmsst gs singe ere ae+and linear drainage r � systems for the 18 rode mnidor loop for bled. and ubimeta SuA021w eAma iwrCrmai and ditches =.:+x.. �:�':. »'.s_.....,..:; .. ,,.. :. _:;.-..._�_. .,,.. -:..., ,.t...,. . _..:_ : _. coop..wfor tvro eves. `„ - r •. - Y" L i .' it I s:. z r Pate ca ysu or approuma y ma vossbgsu HEC-MMS for phaseland u0bnate mndelnes "°i .`. ' . ... .., . -.... ... ..; .. ... ..§ ,a^; .... pia' .- ¢.zY i S na1 a la vdN acavauy tllecks using Regressb Equations oanbrm Hydm la ls Bnd Indud FF]dA croadn a •;.;, _:. ea = .: .,;::.. :',..:• .;,.•w.. • • ,. is :�:;•. ..; .. ..,^,-.- :. - S rhmkH re ha. r. :< "- ro ce .- ' .... -. .. .. ,- .• � ; •. ao gs using HEC-IWI for p w du' ate mMNdsmm Hydrokglo Anoyab (Binge Class CuNew bWdin9 FEMA a.. :r. : '. ...'- ��. with eocana arks using RegresU Equations Orr= owl owacon aossin ,a. °.. ;• :... -.,.. <. :., . .....,> ,. `, i;,. ,:• :... ,>. • .'` S theaaH dam 1a. .. .. ... .. <'< .. .:.. ;. crossing! usb9 HEG11M91or passe 1 and ultimate cordiitow i '�-_:i".. .. 4 "i:-€, `, t. .. ._ acotaacy MoCa�dn9 lanai ons to ran Ragaee fi4uad firm a Culvert aossb •': .::�., ., :. •.4. S t updated UDAR I survey WamadmL PMParod 20 sheatliaw ty `d' �,; 4s _L f 7 dail Wong oorndw new Brushy and WKM*n Creeks to Hydrologic d Hydravda Anaysb along project (F�t. Werlm and '; .... T ; -., z1 i .": aeeMn lD models analyze Impacts help she pann0a and end F'malconddicna 1D12D ,:`"' ..+•..':..'.. - : .:- •':. '-:^'N�<,. .<.- '• _ ..i>. dedt vn. <:>p :. -t. x •• _ c ., , '^ & =z, j" ro'» � by ell FEMA TrappedaWtlua crossingsusN HECiiA3. - ... •: t ;. -: .: ?, �! . The.-18eda toss eon FEMAZano AfbW lsW .... •'• --- v-- - ,: - ; : t 5 mill be a.e.slodwM updated vas eectiona and revised Nn Ezlsl FJietlive muka Ara b EC41AS FEMA vossla - x ,.3 .,.., : •:.° ,. .. .. ".,, a„1 Wo nstion WWn Ne mtiYo modals. Ia,e11 FEMA ma sWdue crossingsusing HECRAS. :;, 2 .: .; :1.: •S' ::f,;, � 4 The fugue bridge crossings an FEMAZweA kdn&Wl „`y •... ,. ,., '�•`. ? ";' evaNabo wlN updated vows secuanaand ravhrba�dPunoR . !. .< .. .. '.+. .. .,: :..- '. ... .>., -, ,_. • �. - .: Infoorution wlNin I the hydauuc mode ! b vase rinsed Edsl aria Awl a a •••�. .. _-,• ..`.. -- - c z _ , using _ Eat FEMA reepped fThe ^&" a� r + •,: - "fib' > g ,a« 44�+1`x L 5„ .. .5 ' : a r i ; . t future bridge B losor e odved wssssinge an FEMA Zane A ..t r g ,: #¢7 '� ":- p 6's\ '' `a" t•S f 3'S' - g y q s ftoodplalna wig be evaluated WMUpdated cross Sectors and EdH Analysis eCWaCuherts ... - Infamaden Whhln the hydraulic modals to veal revised runoff revised edltb conddans ,� :. -_. --•, .'. +. •F .' ,; .� --.`' ..t ,.. sz for eY FEMA mapped structure wlsinga. The fusee culvert • vos4n93 on FEMA Zone ABoodplalna will be evaluated with ';e 7 t updated ooss sections and wMaed nmanrnamar—Atrdn th Faint ea Anal Culvow r, ..vk .,n < r ,xlWdwulic models. Str `rr - .- `< '•t i r s 2 ,r� '#.L 9 a -• Dddge dam out ra to be wnsWd dwiWn the phase and •� - - - t 2 €f 5 x uldmals ROW -Iwa the corridor. lely 16 brfdges Prop NsdauBaAwtlsls Vmdgm br uding FEMA Mgr and/arbdd90 dam alverta sn4 be analyzed loensuie no U HEC-RAS s•`:ro4 . .>ds. adverse lm tar de storm andl aretorm scram. s 2 f t Updataemdngmndltions HEC4M=delsMrbddges BW t--- A SyE Yy s.•.vea { b ? bdd90 dais vdvarb to be, constructed Wn the phase 1 end uDmata ROW slang the comdar. Apfaodmaleiy tS bridges Prop. HydmuOa Analysis (Bddge Cbas Culverts llKludtrlg FEMA 1 �{ ysm. t Will be waWd crossings Using HEC41AS) ,%�., •. •-: .., .. t� .. , ... _... '•. •. ..... .. ••<. .. :.. ..„, adverse Impactor deNmdetonn and 100-er stem scram. CP&Y Fee Page 21 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C • Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23.600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop P.P. Hm Anal(Culvert n s -Im HY-8 ' 'thin the phase 1 and ulVmale ROW along the mmdar, Approximately 26 non bddgo class culvom Wit be enolyxad to ensure no advomO Impact for design slam and 100-yeor ale event ustrq MIS. I)ewd WEE ProMea • ' ExloUng and proposed wator surface profiles Wit be developed for the major elroama being analyrad with HEC4tAS. Approdmately 35 miles of stream will be onalycad In deWllvA1 HEIZI to devote exV sari Sod roaWs, Identify and mi96to Impacts to adjacent amm,1108 ' .. • ' • •' at istat project conditions far the proposed roadeay lmprovemenbto ensure no admma Impact to adjacent propeNos. Err" Including looting at possible improvareants WON No Prepaoa ROW to offset proposed bridge and culven aaesblgs Including denerd dllrhea and mdln . Evaluate floodplaine and flu • • _ o delemdno Vm)I3 or revised ousting floc iplzin to quantify lose o (loodplain stcrago due to proposed project and loceVane of flood oln mlV aVon. Idongf ROW/Ootonllon requirements • • Y mlVgagon of Increased runoff, approximate elxieg or up to 40 locations for detention Including calculating pre and post rune volume. and delermining prulOnlnary sidng of ponds for Woemon oM ROW dolsrenin6l1cm Identify Pmgmmo Datentlon lded.. ssa on ben I. vo umemwa ono, eons en sw as determined for me 40 crossings and elrtrm dmin OWells based on weand best ..If velumea and now rotas, Review Proposed Structuro Conficls wigs Waton of the US OTUS '• .. - ^ ULI,srn8 aveia e We ee uPW and F—Ire—enrol eubconsulleMl, proposed wssinas wiB be revlowed against WOTUS to minimize Impacts to those eves Io Wnmfm torero g4n Draft Pmollminar, Dialmn a Report repaono r renege repo n u ng 1 exhlolls, appendlcii model, aM output for initial agency none and coorolnation, CAI) Exhibits, Tablas and Appendices • Prepare no y rau c a esngs and proposed dolenVon ponds for use YdWn preliminary, drainage report and athematic document Final Drainage Ren F.aldl=.DO.Pritn.1poratadmmowcomman ron agencies and Intorel design OC teams, E. ROW RB tremens R. n e uenu G. u.vqn Earn Voni H. rem Data am Froactiont I. Financial Plan and Pro off Mona moat Pla J. T.M. . Salo Anal d a one Pedestal -Accommodation e COnleat SonsiWe S ubom Stakehold—sounm Workshop Of Work. no rz Workua xpr O. Pwock Immomonuillon Plot 110.3. C .. ,puml Design met 1 0A.Ges-1000al nSNamoucr A. 6. a wnurrts - vanussas sa ma oo on ai omen ..luou, an or awse�ena a nerve, sous e 1 e,, o mi al Renderings drd TMMC u of 110.8.Proldismary Cana cue. Sa uann 110.0. re Imlea cast el mob Osrin Summa Ro 110,f0. En I101A.105.1112 4 tl 12 1 on ucu u nor ne ca al a oEn 00M S I10A en C04Pub..0'abon and PuO two met 4 0 1 2 3 20s b 110.13. Schematic DosDe area in Mal ta4d e6BtM >J nCAtaG. iaT —1 JB2 CO 4, 1 3Vo. 1 1 O .tl' 1 J 7. e. 6 ,7 0 d DISTRIBUTION OFS AFF 0 B. .—AlB3A .1tdl.%I J,0 111B -h 1..—Al1020% _ SUBTOTAL•FC 102 110 TASK DESCRIPTION DUALITY MANAGER SENIOR ENVIRONMENT N tip ENVIRONMENT ALPLANNERiV ENVIRONMENT AL PLANNER III ENVIRONMENT AL PLANNER UII SENIOR BIOLOGIST BIOLOGIST IV BIOLOGIST III BIOLOGIST III, SENIOR GIS SENIOR GIS OPERATOR JUNIOR GIS 'UNCLERICAL ADMWI TOTAL COMMENTS INVOLVEMENT 120.1, awronm0nla Oscumonmllsn Standard 62 1202. Environmrtntal assaaaman PA Crnlont rind Few S 46 64 24 1s 16 B 32 216 2 .. n manta m aM 9talemenl nlenl an 12o d. Environmon- It.--.atlon Fan '. .• 120A. n goers ace Ma ae and von 0a ommona o n,ca one as an ocumono no am onvbenmanlol mrvirae .. H. Minimum averoaet .... -..... CPS,Y Fee Pago 22 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C- Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop NG110 GOD f@ 11e—FFASOU STUDIE. 1. . 2 16,980. 8 2 1, ,a2T. .308.40 ,583.52 J.BI7.1fi 914.68 7,807.J6 J, 94.80 64,162.38 PonC ON CO 120 120—SOCIAU CO STUD . 91, .0 .00 0, 1 . 2 ,9 2.Be B,B BA .fi ,H2 16308.fi4 4,2fi9.44 2J.4220 18,fi92.98 288.980.99 LOMNACTED/DONATED PE S 3.903.52 f 37,144.80 f f 1D,S56E0 S S I. S I. I f I S S 13.613.78 S 85,218.88 9,758.81) 1 S 125.292.32 1 47.501.52 15 42,755.04 28,790.12 5 22.285.8e 1 5 33,287.05 28,239 18, 35.80 I 5,184.32 31.22 .44 1 5 22,287.78 13,8 3.7e 28,382.25 CPBY Fee Page 23 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider: Quiddity Engineering LLC Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost M(�NA(3INdCONTRACTED/DONATEDP.•E:-:FC.145(164)�� : •':. '• . ,:°ww•,,,.. ,....,� '-�,• : •,-:;.?w,�;,� '' :,..,:••. ;4.;:.. OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES:;' _ , p �.; • M1 -7-'NIT UNT1TY RATE:.QdA ;TOTAL ' =,.. LodginglHotel - Taxes and Fees day/person "$45.00•• ••::l 20 , ' .-. $900.00 Lodging/Hotel (Taxes/fees not Included) day/person $1,980.00 Meals (Excluding alcohol & tips) (Overnight stay required) day/person �;$59.00- is „_;:20�,;i ; $1,180.00 Mileage mile $0.Ei55.: 2 $1,637.50 Rental Car Fuel gallon -.$5:00' •::: 100-- <= $500.00 Rental Car (Includes taxes and fees; Insurance costs will not be reimbursed) day ; $100.04 - , 5 . $500:00 Alr Travel - Out of State - 2+ Wks Notice (Coach) Rd Trip/person $1,000.00 *-�.' ,�1'':'.- f' $1,000.00 Oversize, special handling or extra baggage airline fees each 1100.00::: _ ::'1:< ° < : $100.00 Parking day $.30.00: ',:,:' 2' . .. $60.00 TaxYCab fare (Includes Rideshare) each/person ;_;$4O;p0 ;:. ,t :.:, ;:.; . $80.00 Toll Charges day ; 460.4.d• ° .. .:4.:: -;: ' $200.00 Photocopies B1W (11" X 17") each ,• $0:25 : . •s`: 25D $62.60 Photocopies BMW (8112" X 11") each $0:15; ..'?.: 500 $75.00 Photocopies Color (11" X 17") each $1.25, :: `, :� :500 $625.00 Photocopies Color (81/2" X 11") each $1:00, :;::,,,.-100_ $100.00 Materials and Shipping per package • $100:00 .`i, .:.3' °- - $300.00 Noise Meter Rental Unit -Includes noise meter, camera, tripods, calibrator peralternative :'$300:011 ....... " ,;:.. $600.00 Aerial Photographs (1" = 500' scale) each 1125.00°. ll:? `;1= . $125.00 Environmental Field Supplies (lathes, stakes, flagging, spray paint, etc.) day :"$35.00 " ' 4 ...:: $140.00 Hazardous Materials Database Report per mile .•$.125.00 20 $2,500.00 Historical Aerial Images unit • $250.00 •;, .• 1 .' $250.00 GPS Receiver Rate hour $30.00.• .. 24 '•.:•:. $720.00 SUBTOTAI- OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES $13,615.00 Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Project 1 Inner Loop CPBY Costs Page 24 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop Terracon Fee Page 25 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop 163.9. Special Utility Details(Water. Sanitary Sewer, etc.' 163.10. Miscellaneous Structural Details 163.12. Testimony for Right of Way Hearings 163.13. Estimate 153.14. Contract time determination 163.15. Specifications and General Notes 163.16. Constructability Review 163.17. Scheduling and Tracking 163.18. Deliverables 163.2. Geotechnical Borings and Investigations Exploration Planning and Execution Project Coordination, Planning, and Interne Progress Meetings 18 9 6 12 24 6 24 12 111 Review ExistingInformalion 6 2 4 6 18 Pre arin BoringLocation and Field Investigation Safe Plans 2 1 4 10 24 14 28 83 Selection of Standard Tralric Control Plans for Borin s 1 3 6 10 13 33 Coordination W ro ec earn an oun y or pprovaI ol Ljoring Location Plans 2 6 7 16 11 44 Communication vnin P—ro—pe—Fly-i5wRers to Coordinate Site Visit an Exploration Schedules 4 2 15 30 40 1 91 Site Visits to Assess Access and Stake Boiring Locations 2 2 6 22 56 88 Uglil Clearance for Borings 2 4 8 22 28 64 0o ma on win uoring, wrating, I ra c Control, Survey, and Non. Destructive Testing Crews 1 2 6 22 62 93 Daily rave , ore o e ogging, an ua i y surance o ie Exploration 4 4 4 20 44 1 80 984 1140 Site Safety Check -Ins During Field Work 4 2 8 10 24 Collection o iezome c Readings locations, monthly readings for 24 months 8 25 264 297 Laboratory Testing and Date Ra ortin Sample Invento and Review for Laboratory Testing 2 3 4 16 20 40 85 Prepare and Coordinate Laboratory Testing Assignments 1 1 3 8 10 23 Review of Laborato Test Results 2 3 3 6 16 30 repara ion o of onngLogs ivilinoorej, avemen ore Logs, an DCP Test Results 4 6 10 18 1 48 86 Preparation of Boring Location Maps 1 1 3 6 11 Preparation of Geotechnical Data Report 2 3 2 6 14 10 6 43 Geotechnical Engineering Analysis. Design, and Reporting Review and Comment on Bridge and Retaining Wall Layouts 2 4 6 4 16 Develop Bridge voundation uapacny Curves, LVJLr Parameters, an Design Recommendations 27 bodngs 3 4 9 54 70 Deveto Bridge Foundation Construction Considerations 1 1 4 8 14 eve op of arame ers an GeometricModels or m an men an Retaining Wall Anal ses 1 1 3 6 11 Perform Analysis for Embankment I Retaining Wall bettlement,o a , and Extemal Slabity6 2 3 6 20 31 obosrings eommeve op a or Petaining Wall HeinforcemenrCengfFs and Ground Improvement Requirements 1 2 3 10 16 Deveto MSE DID Sheets 1 1 1 1 1 4 9 eve optiriage Glass Guiven DeFign Recommendations an Construction Considerations 3 borings) 1 2 8 11 Perform Analysis for Pond Slope Stability 10 locations` 2 3 8 33 46 Preparing Soil Boring Data Sheets 2 2 2 4 3 20 3 36 Preparation of Draft Geotechnical EngineeringEngineedng Report 2 3 3 7 13 1 29 Preparation of Final Geotechnical Engineering Report 1 1 2 3 4 11 Pavement Design and Reporting Perform Visual Condition Assessment at Cross -Streets 12 12 1 24 Process and Review FWD and DCP data 2 4 10 20 36 Perform Potential verticalRise (PVR) Calculations an eve op Mitigation Strategies 1 2 4 18 25 evaew Monitoring Well Data and identifyc en is roun wa er Issues 2 2 6 6 16 Perform FPS 21 & I x calculations for Asphalt & C—cn—cr-a =e Pavements 1 3 4 36 44 Prepare Permanent Pavement Design Options 1 1 2 6 12 22 Prepare Ten ore Pavement Desl n O Bons 1 1 2 6 10 Coordinate an en avemen esign on erence with RM/District 2 4 4' 6 10 26 i e Cycle Cost Analysis to Evaluate Flexible and Kigia- Alternatives 1 2 6 10 24 . 43 Preparation of Draft Pavement Design Report 2 2 8 16 56 84 Preparation of Final Pavement Design Report Terracon Fee Page 26 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project t Inner Loop Terracon Fee Page 27 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeeri.ng LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project I Inner Loop M!§PELL-AN9QQ0RQADWAY P ONER-DIRECT'EX ENSES--:-":-.' -W UNIT. .-RATE �,","-'QUANTITY'"" Lodging/Hotel -Taxes and Fees day/person ,.-.:$45.00 r z..145 $6,526.00 Lodging[Hotdl (Taxes/fees not included) day/person .. ....... $14.210.00 Meals (Excluding alcohol & tips) (Overnight stay required) day/person ...... 146 ... ... ... $8,555.00 Mileage mile ;.= . J Z, �j' '' -7. , $1,775.05 M0112laon and DemooMmuon at Non Des l3eliecuon I esung (I nps witnin 100 miles fromofficeto site) each Y--' . ..... $0.00 monnization an WOrnobilmStion 01 Non Destructive Deflection I esting I n ps over I UUTM-Wes— from office to site) mite ... ... $1,200.00 Mobilization of ATV Buggy / Track Drilling Equipment less 100 mile each .'$1'j809.00 $23,400.00 Mobilization of AN Buggy / Track Drilling Equipment more than 100 mile mile $18;00 $0.00, ATV Surcharge (for rig installed on ATV) LF -15.00 3,11 $15,750.00 Stand By of Drilling Equipment hour 150-06-::" $10,850.0 0 Mobilization and Demobilization of Drilling Rig (Taps within 100 miles from office to site) trip $3,000.00 Mobilization and Demobilization of Drilling Rig (Trips over 100 miles from office to site) mile :. ".--$6.00-:' $0.00 mobilizationo T coring equipment used to OrIll 116ADle and ngla pavement (2-man crew minimum, Labor paid separately)(less 100 miles) tap $7,200.00 31 Mobilization of coring equipmenruse UTo-Un-IITre—RiDle and ngid pavement (2-man crew minimum, Labor paid separately)(over 100 miles) mile ! 'tft 0 7 $0.00 Hydro -vacuum Excavation (equipment materials, and labor) hour 45 00z•""' 71 $3,600.00 Portable Message Board day t500.'00' $12,000.00 Flashing Arrow Board day 600:00!': $0.00 Law Enforcement/Uniform Officer (including vehicle) hour $2,700.00 Attenuator trucks - (Lane/Shoulder Closure) (includes labor, equipment and fuel) day $1.60106:': $0.00 Aftenuator trucks - (No Lane Closure) (includes labor, equipment and fuel) day $0.00 ----ranic Cono l -Services. Arrow Boards an a Aftenuator TFUCKS - (Incluces latFor, equipmenran O I fuel) day 5 50.0.0i,7 $61.800.00 Bulldozer Rental day 3,000.00:, -10 $60,000.d0o ISUBTOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES 0, $232,565. , MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY*- FUNCTION CODE 160 (1.03) TEST :TOTAL X. RATE "tUAkTItY:, !-,�;_0013E' Borehole Grouting - Bentonite Chips LF $41,895.00 Concrete/AC Patch per patch $3,150.00 Core Drill Asphalt each '.:- $125.00*. .. $5,625.001 Core Drill Concrete each '$155.00: $0.00 Dynamic Cone Penetrometer In Shallow Pavement Applications each -$81.--•':;.,i-' ASTM D6951 $6,960.00 Non Destructive Deflection Testing - Falling Weight Deflection (FVVD) day .$3,500;00:, $17.500.00 Plezometer Abandonment each ...:1$47,5.00 ; .;!-'22 $10,450.00 iPlezometer Finish: Flush Mount w/ Z x 2' pad each $400: $8,800.00 JPIezometer-2- LF $18,800.00 Terracon Costs Page 28 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project I Inner Loop Soil Boring/Rock Coring with TCP ( < 60 ft.) LF T;- Tex-132-E $105,450.00 Soil Boring/Rock Coring with TCP ( > 60 ft.) LF ibb go.! A Tex-132-E $45,030.00 Soil Boring/Rock Coring without TCP ( < 60 ft.) LF ...... $38,448.00 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split -Barrel Sampling of Soils each ASTM D1586 $13,065.00 California Searing Ka (L;HK) OT LaDoratory-Compacted Solls (Single Sample witno-OTM13— Curve) test .... $W:G,W� ASTM D1883 $1,550.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength (Soil) each ,_:,$70: ASTM D2166 $13,440.00 Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head) each 0 ASTM D2434 $2,000.00 Oneamensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading each ASTM D2435 $1,725.00 Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions set of 3 $1:,100;4q_!,: ASTM D3080 $9.900.00 measurement at Hydraulic Uonaluctiviry at Saturated Porous materials Using a f-leXible—wa-117 Permeameter each 5 ASTM D5084 $2,000.00 Determining Moisture Content in Soil Materials each ._$18.0,0 Tex-1 03-E $10,710.00 Determining Liquid Limits of Soils each Tex-1 04-E $23,355.00 Determining Plastic Soil Limits each '$45' 0' .0 Z:r Tex-1 05-E $23,355.00 Calculating the Plasticity Index of Soils each '$46 60. 619"..?." Tex-1 06-E $23,355.00 Particle Size Analysis of Soils each 11.1.0.00, Tex-1 1 O-E $3,850.00 Determining the Amount of Material in Soils Finer than the 75 micrometer (No. 200) Sieve each $60;00 519 Tex-1 I I-JE $31.140.00 Laboratory Compaction Characteristics and Moisture -Density Relationship of Subgrade, Embankment Solis, and Backfill Material each -$276 , 00-N4*-, j�, Te 1 14-E x- $1,375.00 Triaxial Compression for Disturbed Solis and Base Materials each 11.§60:001t'�r• Tex-1 17-E $7,800.00 Triaxial Compression Test for Undisturbed Solis each $150 J00- •54 a Tex-1 18-E $8,100.00 Soil -Lime Testing - Part 3 each 1. Tex-121-E $3,575.00 Consolidated Undrained (CU) Tda)dal Compression Test for Undisturbed Soils- Single Stage set of 3 Tex-131-E $3,960.00 Determining Sulfate Content In Solis - Calorimetric Method each $132:00::%'��,' t:,132__� Tex-145-E $17,424.00 Soil Organic Content Using UV-Vis Method each 1 ..:$340;bQi:,-:, .60.,: Tax-148-E $22,440.00 SUBTOTAL UNIT COSTS $526,227.00 Terracon Costs Page 29 of 32 Exhibit C Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23•S00 Quiddity Engin000dng LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project t Inner Loop T�".ti'C=Rb9.OT.�S�'i.T7AT:76'48r"7^"=-bS•70828 r.:,•xe;, .--<r '�.s y;s� ACHNICA TECHNICAL (9ENIORImnson SUPPORT MANAGER SENIOR ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER ENGINESR4N• TRAINING ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN SENIOR ENIOCADD OPERATOR CAD OPERATOR ADMINI CLERICAL TOTAL - COMMENTS . 2 area planesa Maintenance a men all so .' . . .. .... ........ . + ... ,. .,. , ,. ,. ..r .,.:. .:: .,. �.. ..v... .... , .. Assumed aeon twoa ninon - a 1' d . .. ,. .... ... ....' .. ;.. ...Atrammod view of Iwo 3 al. a 1 24 ..11 12 . e 4o 66 :. .. 2 ,,. 4..... ... ... g .� .. .. q .. .... 1a • - H. .. . irC• ....... ".;; ,, ,.., -:.FReviewano :. t.. .:•: .`f .:: cousin exisng d4saIntrallnem a andcata prepared y uco agen ea, reMA Mal) Change Information. andFLM 9LE models . .: .: .. ,.. ,. ... .. .... ... ... . .. 9tD baaeasmCrla arm o6 a town rm ex ssn I Ong an in l dW w ton .: ." ....' •' ......... :.. ....... : ,...,.: '- - ,::. ..s.• en po an a m ago ou a or amp ma a w8 gs or up o a gamer n order to minimize mpa 53TRWT. ROW . ,. 'Bmneh• it m Witolthad levelr g a for WRAdoh clockand n p ne roe en ea, bui.phall- Brushy Creek, and Costefe Creek Tributaries whIch Is pPrerexlmalat61a er wssln s. .. ', ^. ' '•:.:: ' 1Bmllaoordder co forinlodmanduNmalowndltlonafor Mro apasy arm o moor aoa n roar ra ins o p angee Bean r ' ., ,. ,;1 •, .: •:: "' i • ' ' r .. • ' ropare ro aanaya ,are ro mad m.ereroso geus orprison I one ultimate coneons assume chocks usln Ra roatilonel E otters to canarm 9 moat H ro re ha. • ' ,..' ,. .:. i ..:: .. .... ... '... .. roper. y roogroawy s a p oapp— a maoraosangs uang HEC.HM5 fare ass 1 an .10m.r.con rrs v4 swum chat aualn Ra reasknalE 4l, -to conI theVcH d ro ha P % -.k: reparo y aeon yes sup many ma ,—T..a ucng orp ado an u msewn ono 8=110Y cheeks usInn Rnfiresslonal Equations to wnarm Synitrallc H rice ro e ' Rerlawr and updated available 9LE hydraulic models with updated UDAR I survey Iffamadon. Prepared 20 ohea low modals slant wnldornoM ah and Wickman Creeks to confirm f0 models and and elm eats and hat sizearraanl each ores. - - u w no a u s 1 r a o MAJOWWOTWITAll 10 oxkting waainge on FEMA Zono A fkmdplaino wa ba ..lusted with upd.t.d sees n gona and mvieod mnoff Infammion Withl the hydraidle models . , Upd.t.11Lk models Is o oeo salere se o a Ira re . ng bridgewatiinge on FEMA Zone A 0-dplaka will be evaluated with updated wss.esters and revised runoRlldormaUan waMn lh h mulls modals to wala roviwd axlsUn wndlllone ' ,. 1 :. • ,... .. .. _ ... .. ' ^ .. .. .:. 0 ULb Models 10 Crisis 1— bridge class culvert emaslags on FEMA Zero A Iloodptalne will be evaluated with updated cross medians and revised small Information within the h roufa modals to memo revised existlart considers crossings an FEMA Zone A f oodplaln , will be evaluated with updated we=scwona and revised runolf lMarmoUon within V o hydraulicrasdal.. ..... ., .: ,`:+' ..... ,. , ..• .J,. •'• --• ..+5. ...:. .. i.:.. ,.. YQ f .. I, ^ t:. 0 5 an e a ig n ng 0 n a ROW along the corridor. Apprordmelel 15 bid a andtor bridge class culverts will be analyzed to ensure no adverse bapad for Y Sa Yz .dal nstorm erdla .dl alarm OVOnL -',. . ; „/', • .. ,', -�• r:,. - andrerb class will a to ensure no adverse or OW ate the coMdor. Approximately bridges bridge cis.; be analyzed Impadf R g d0ai n m101m and 100ea! pieml aVenl. •� Update existing wrldlfone author mwak to be consWaad within the phsaot and ulUmaro ROW along the corridor. Approximately 25 non brides daea MvortA wlO be one od l..naure noadve eM ocifordesl nstarm.n010 or storm evonlusN HYe ' one yza m pproama e .9 on prop. r au pro r o ova spa fir a me or eeme a n55 a ee of Imam.lit .na dInd thllwithH C. Sladmoa exiadn .nd me sari males, . .'.' '..: :..., .. • .. r. : . ..... ' e pp .x rta . aria nga a and yio or pro en pea pro n or r p off.'lovens 1 edvom ImpaU to eollawnt propeaiea,: Effort- In-l-ing looking at possible Improvements within the proposed ROW to offset tied bdd a and advert croaeln akUudin Wdonendditchm; and dl more ' •� :.'�4+" i:/ •', .: , , :vr:: • •:.:. oca orreo v. p aressw eava use . eertn no m o ro sa exc ng w pan ogwn a• good I.In alOm D dY01a ro Daed ro od and bcoUona e111sod laic mlt atloN . ., ,• .• '. ,": 1 1 4 0 n u e O dotenu.n Including calculating par and posl Nno9volumae and metomdningpreliminary slring of ponds farplawment and ROW determination eellsn .Nno YOklmea0 dlkaw mrosco. a. ia9W a.. fir wee nga as a- as Ou age ' g.va a e e en a n.rma on from Wallands Mapper. vronmen suboontrultants. pruposed Crossings rallowad a stoat WQ to minim@o tin aria Ip Ihaso areas to kn for hdure Imittin . .. .. • t,.. ,,. .. , , .. 'ii ,. zt.' rop.m no ra ron.Sa repo c ng nano va, as,a ,.peen cos, me a,an ou u or m a ngmryro ew fir coordination. • „ � ' ropare ono y mu .o a oeo or croa ng. an DraDoao an use w n pro m nary ra n arhemaacdoclrrneat Finals disinanore on Incorporated revisor comments from review a art as and lateral design OClease .L . F. .. 41. 4 '.. .. .. .. :. e.. .. .., tie a 24 2 Westwood Fee Page 30 of 32 Exhibit C Prima Provider. Exhibit C-Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23.600 Quiddity Engirreeesing LLC Method of Payment:. Lump Sum Unit Cast Project 1 Inner Loop G�'..�"ML:'Ldr':�rad�:ta�r: �ieaetii::c:a 0�'�GtErx�zYi7.x E71�1:�:�^.y�:x[.��ir�n��cr.�c.� rt�6E� F�civ�u:�YFxr�rzx[;1 � - E� EF�If7k�F�:lEi�F�E>OE��F .vax, rnr::,v:n....ra..,xa. tssz22ntitZlm izssLt�aaaaaaiir7aYtitFlzCn-t--�5➢. diilaaq:td`:1NIrMgt,`72 ®� �®®�IIIIIIIIIIIII®s ®Illt�® rlr� ®®®®� ilt� IIIIIIII� s IIIII�� IIt�>_ ®� � ®I®rrffff r-- aTtears:mnafe�z;x;raE�•zcs[y�>er.�arn[:sryt`ells'_r�'.yE��esr�.*rlrF�acck.t:ltt�Yver��E�Cs1E aa�a.ascnnr�.aarsnxs��r•1 a�riteR� Riaa� a 7�RiibiT.T E w}�i.rr.r..�..r:r.r..�.Ja,v-zx Ri'i!Yl fi51Rik5Ci�L1k?7 Riifi[iYl�l Risi7:i:'_�hi:SlRikA:IL�1Ri/-1YlTrx,rl RleF.10 FZi�T 7..ryf.'ii x YiRf1 WOstvrood Fee Page 31 of 32 EiNbit 0 Prime Provider. Exhibit C - Fee Schedule Contract ID No. CIP 23-600 Quiddity Engineeering LLC Method of Payment: Lump Sum Unit Cost Project 1 Inner Loop u tr FUNCTION .CODE'162{1a0) . FEASIBILITY STtlDIEB ._,_. e_. x ;} �.,- • ti „z TOTAL.: OTHER DI.RECT.EXPEN$ES �'> a ;� ;:UNLT K CRATE n_ Qt�ANTIIY .'COST. Lodging/Hotel -Taxes and FeesF day/person $45 00 : > 15 $675.00 Lodging/Hotel (Taxes/fees not included) daylperson -:, $9$:00.. ' : ,..:. _- ,;<, _= 15: _ ,`. . ;' : $1,470.00 Meals ($13 Breakfast, $15 Lunch, $26 Dinner, $5 Incidental) day/person $59A0 ; 40 $2,360.00 Mileage mile _$0 655 v-. _ 5;550 $3,635.25 Tolls day _�50 00..E „w 30,_. $1.500.00 Rental Car Fuel gallon , .'24 `... $120.00 Rental Car (Includes taxes and fees; Insurance costs will not be reimbursed) day $100.00: «. 24 $2,400.00 Air Travel - In State - 2+ Wks Notice (Coach) Rd Trip/person 3530 00 5.`° $2,650.00 Plots (Color on Bond) per sq. ft. $1:75': ;;,. ; ::=ti.:`1;500: - ,.= $2,625.00 SUBTOTAL OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES $17,435.25 Westwood Costs Page 32 of 32 Exhibit C RFQ CIP 23-600-1 Bond Funded Engineering Design Services Firm Name Max Points UA BGE Westwood Binkley & Barfield Lamb -Star Freese & Nichols LAN Walker Partners LTRA Gessner Quiddity R.G. Miller DEC Halff Evaluator #1 Evaluator ##2 Evaluator #3 I Totals Project 1 Project 1 Project 1 Project 1 8o 75 93 248 88 44 66 198 Committee Recommended Award: Quiddity Ap Commis loner's Cou an this day of FE691JAP-4.202Ay holding the position of�� Brazos County Purchasing Department 200 S. TX AVE., SUITE 352 BRYAN, TX 77803 PHONE (979) 3614290 FAX (979) 3614293 SRAZOS COUNTY BID/RFP/RFQ DOCUMENTATION SHEET Purchasing Department would like to request Commissioner's Court approval to advertise go out for Bid on the following: TE: February 6, 2024 ) NUMBER: CIP 24-611 : Demolition & Removal Services for Multiple County Buildings DEPARTMENT: Purchasing VAL SIGNATURE: Duane Peters, County Judge TE APPROVED: V L K I A R C H I T E C T S January 31, 2024 (Revision 1) Wm. Charies Wendt Purchasing Agent Brazos County 200 S. Texas Ave., Ste. 352 Bryan, TX 77803 Re: Proposal for Brazos County Expo Complex Facility Assessment Dear Charles: VLK Architects (VLK) is pleased to present to Brazos County this proposal for Facility Assessment services for the Facility Assessment of Brazos County Expo Complex in Bryan, Texas. We greatly appreciate your trust of the VLK team. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Brazos County desires to conduct a facility assessment of the Expo complex, located at 5827 Leonard Rd., Bryan, Texas, that includes all of the buildings, parking areas and driveways, and the retention pond. SCOPE OF SERVICES VLK will approach the following design tasks in two distinct phases: PHASE 1- ON SITE FACILITY ASSESSMENT 1. Visit each site, identified by the owner, and identify items that are considered at the end of useful life, code violation or design concerns. The items identified will be documented and pictures of the identified item will be recorded. In addition, owner standards can be reviewed where they are provided prior to site assessments. 2. Compile assessment documentation to prepare for reporting phase. PHASE 2 - REPORTING PHASE 1. Create an itemized list of deficiencies identified during the.on-site assessment phase and enter data into the assessment forms. 2. Prepare an "Opinion of Potential Construction Cost" for each item included on the deficiency list. This "Opinion of Potential Construction Cost is merely an expression of professional opinion and will be based on information provided to us regarding construction costs on a similar type of project. As such, it constitutes neither a guarantee nor a warranty, express or implied. 3. Attend meetings with the county as required to provide explanation and assist with finalizing scope items. 4. Collaborate with the owner to identify a priority ranking for each deficiency. The Assessment Team includes: ArchitectureAnterior (VLK) Structural Engineering (Matrix) MEPT Engineering (Salas O'Brien) Civil Engineer (Mitchell & Morgan) Food Services (FCA Design) Roof and Building Envelope. Specialist (Armko) COMPENSATION Given the scope of work described above, we propose a net lump sum of $39,000.00 not including reimbursable expenses, additional services, or specialty consulting fees. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Reimbursable expenses are defined as those actual expenditures incurred directly in conducting the project. These include, but are not limited to, travel, long distance telephone, facsimile, reproductions, printing, delivery costs, professional renderings, photography, presentation models, and special presentation materials. Reimbursable expenses are not to exceed $2,000.00. PAYMENT SCHEDULE Billing shall be made monthly in proportion to the services completed with payment due thirty days after receipt by the Client. All invoices shall be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt and in accordance to the payment schedule stipulated above. Failure to pay undisputed invoices or the undisputed portions of invoices shall constitute sufficient reason for VLK to suspend all services until payment is received. VLK shall not be responsible for any consequences to project schedules, etc., for suspending services in the event of Client's non-payment. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Services not specifically listed above are not a part of our scope of basic services and are considered additional. VLK shall be compensated for approved additional services not outlined in this proposal, on an hourly basis, determined in accordance with an available rate schedule.or a mutually agreeable lump sum. STATEMENT OF .JURISDICTION Pursuant to Texas Law: "The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners, P. O. Box 12337, Austin, Texas 78711-2337 or 333 Guadalupe, Suite 2-350 Austin, Texas 78701-3942, (512) 305-9000, has jurisdiction over individuals licensed under the Architects' Registration Law, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 249a." Charles, we trust this proposal meets with your expectations. We look forward to initiating this exciting project and to establishing a new and long-term working relationship with you and your associates. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Christopher Laack Principal of Design - Commercial Practice VLK Architects, Inc. APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED This proposal and the AIA B105 (to be executed after acceptance of this proposal) contract form the entire agreement. These two documents establish the basis for scope of work and fees. Mr. William Charles Wendt, Brazos County, their appointed agents, and partners; and VLK Architects Inc. hereby agree that authorization of the proposal is a legal binding contract to provide the I urel service describe ve a co a - Agent, Officer or Partner Date To: From: Date: Subject: Agenda Item: BACKGROUND College Station Independent School District Success —each life ... each day ...each hour MEMORANDUM Amy Drozd, Chief Financial Officer G Jon Hall, Executive Director of Facilities March 2, 2021 Consider selection of an architectural firm to serve as a resource for the Bond Planning Committee and to provide architectural services associated with any construction projects that may result from that planning process. K-2 A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Architectural Services was circularized to the public requesting interested firms to submit their qualifications to the district. Twelve firms responded to the RFQ. The submitted qualifications were evaluated by a committee consisting of the Chief Financial Officer, the Director of Business, the Director of Instruction, the Principal of Oakwood Intermediate School, the Executive Director of Facilities, and the Assistant Director of Facilities. The original twelve firms were then shortlisted to three fouls who were invited for interviews on Monday, March 1, 2021. These three films were VLK Architects, PBK Architects, and Huckabee Architects. For the interviews, the original committee was increased by the addition of the Superintendent of Schools. This committee interviewed the representatives of the firms and evaluated them based on the criteria listed in the RFQ. All three firms did very well in their interview, but ultimately the decision was made to choose VLK Architects as the official architectural firm for CSISD's upcoming bond planning process. The firm of VLK Architects has a long history of providing excellent service to the District in the design of new schools as well as the design of many deferred maintenance and renovations projects across the district. The selection committee concluded that VLK Architects would be the appropriate firm to serve as a resource to the Bond Planning Committee and to provide architectural services associated with any construction projects that may result from that planning process. The final recommendation matrix with signatures of the committee members is attached. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Trustees of College Station Independent School District authorize the Superintendent or his designee to negotiate and execute a contract with VLK Architects to serve as a resource to the Bond Planning Committee and to provide architectural services associated with facilities included in a bond program that evolves from the work of that committee. Jon Hall 1812 Welsh Avenue Mike Martindale Executive Director for Facilities College Station, TX 77840 Superintendent of Schools (979) 694-5660 979-764-5400—www.csisd.org College Station ISD Request for Qualifications for Architect Selection RFQ 21-005. Shortlist for Interviews Meeting 22-Feb-21 Firm's I Personnel Staff and I Quality of I Innovative I Project I Overall I Financial Project erience ExpExperience Workload I rnnrents Annrn; RPniitntinn + CtaI hility Riirivat Tntal Firm Name 25% 20% 5% 5% 10% 5% 10% 10% 10% 100% BRW 20 17 4 5 8 5 8 0 8 75 Corgan 21 16 4 4 9 4 8 .8 8 82 Huckabee 23 18 4 5 9 5 9 8 9 90 IBI 21 16 3 4 7 4 7 8 8 78 Patterson 20 16 3 3 6 3 5 0 8 64 PBK 23 19 5 5 9 5 9 8 8 91 Pfluger 23 17 4 4 8 5 8 8 9 86 Plan North 18 16 3 4 7 4 8 0 8 68 Ramirez -Simon 10 10 2 2 6 3 7 0 6 46 Stantec 21 18 3 4 8 3 6 8 6 77 SZH 18 16 3 3 7 3 6 0 8 64 VLK 24 19 5 5 9 5 9 8 10 94 Recommended Firm(s) for Interviews: VLK, PBK, and Huckabee Mike Martindale th.+ p4ecC., Josh Symank Jon Hall Amy Drozd Jeff Mann Rene Ramirez Carmella Shafer Thad Lasater .. ORDER VACATING ROAD ('Order") STATEOF TEXAS § COUNTY O1= BRAZOS § WHEREAS, the Brazos County Commissioners Court desires to close; abandon, and vacate a public road upon the following tract: - All that certain, lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated iri the ELLIOT M. MILLICAN SURVEY, Abstract No. 40, Brazos County,, ,Texas, and being the' undeveloped 20 foot wide alley as depicted in Block 101, TOWN OF MILLICAN, according to the pl.at.recorded in Volume "P", Page, 484, of the Deed Records of Brazos County.:Texas (DRBCT); also a tract being portion of undeveloped right -of way , of Washington Street (1004obt wide, •P/484 DRBCT) adjoining Block 101 and Block 85 of the TOWN OF MILLICAN, according to the plat recorded in Volume "P"; •Page 484' of the -Deed Records of Brazos County Texas (DRBCT); also a tract being portion of undeveloped 20-foot wide alley as depicted in Block 85,.TOWN OF MILLICAN, according to the plat recorded in Volume "P";-Page 484, of Deed Records of Brazos County Texas (DRBCT). and these tracts being more particularly described by metes and bounds in Exhibit A, -attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; WHEREAS, Texas Transportation Code §251.001' defines "abantlon" as to "relinquish the public's right of way in and use of the road" and defines "vacate" as to "terminate the existence of the road by direct action of the commissioners court of a county'. TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE §251.001 (1j and (3j; and WHEREAS, Texas Transportation Code §251,051(a)(1) states "the commissioners court of a county shall order that public roads be 'laid out, opened, discontinued, closed; abandoned, vacated or altered." TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE §251.057 (a) (I) - and WHEREAS, Texas Transportation Code. §251.061(b)(1)'states "a unanimous vote of.the., ,.:commissioners court :is required to . close, abandon; ''or vacate a public: 'road," TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE §251.051(b)(1); and _ WHEREAS, no person that owns property that abuts the public road being closed, abandoned . -and vacated ' has attempted to enjoin the -entry or enforcement of :this order. TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE §251.058(a)(1); and WHEREAS, the public road being, closed, abandoned and vacated does not provide the only . - ingress of . egress to any property adjacent to -it. TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE.§251.058 (a). (2);' -and "WHEREAS; title'to the public'road being closed, abandoned and vacated to the center line of the:rbad will vest on the date this order is signed by the county judge in the owner. of the property that • : abuts the road being closed, • abandoned and vacated, and a copy of this order shall be filed in .the - - deed records of the county and serves as the official instrument:of conveyance from the county to the owner of the abutting property. TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE §251.058-(b). " NOW, THEREFORE; IT iS`'ORDEREp,-upon proper notice and,annouricement as r®,quired.by = . l . :. . law,:and'upon motion dulyrnade and.Wconded, and passed by.aunarilmous vote, as indicated�by the signatures of.the County Commissioriers below, the public road upon the following tract is'hereby':.: closed, abandoned and:yacated ' . . All :that certain;' lot,'tract-or- parcel of land lying and. being situated in tl}e:ELLIOT M._ MILLICAN _. :: SURVEY;` Abstrect.No,�40," Brazos County,T;exas, and':6eing the .undeveloped 20-foot wide ' _:alley as depicted m.Block'109., TOWN:OF •MIkr.L1CAN, according tothe'plat recorded in Volume `. "P°; Page 484, ,of the Deed Records of Brazos County;Texas :{DRBCT); also a. tract being :.; ::. . -porgon of .undeveloped: right;of-way_ of.Washington Street.`:(100 foot wide; P1.4 "DRBCT) adjoining Bloc1.k:40! and B16*:.8 'of the TOWN OF MILLICAN; according to the plat recorded ° :; , 4 Volume "P°, Page 484, of.fhe.Deed Records of Erazos County Texas (DRBC3); also a tract being porban of undeveloped 2U-foot alley as depicted in Block 8v, tOWN OF MILL'ICAN, according to the plat eecorded,in Volume,"P°,:Page 484,.of the'Deed Records of BrazosCounty Texas: D.RBC anO these tracts bein more particulars described 0y_metes and bounds in { ' Ezhttiit A`aitacfied hereto`and:incorporated herein - by reference,'.:' :... FURTHERMORE - BE. IT :ORDERED 'thit`'this .OidLir-."id (is : as ;the .-6Mb!w .'insfrument`.of conveyarica;of.the property described -in Exhibit A; :from the Grantor, Brazos .Coon ,Texas, to . e = • - -.:. owner' of roe abuttm •the road closed, abandoned and,vacated; 'said oininer: being ,MONTCtAIR ::,,:.....o p ..p sty► .....•:9:... COMPANIES, L'LC, ahe.,dimensions of the' property being conveyed':are described.'in Exhibit A, i ;;'..aitached hereto and incorporated for:all-purposes herein. . . Issued, by'authority:of the Cotimissioners:Court of Brazos.County, Texas, this •-. day_of ':.February, 2024 . .........'::: . . .. .. - � Duane Peters .... ... . ... = Co u ` 'nty;Judge :( :'... ;Commissioner_Steve Aldrich Commissioner:Chuok Konder .a.. . .... ..� Preciricf 1 ' ' :-, Precinct 2 .. ,•j, - ,.. `Commissioner -Nancy- Berry: -.-' :. ' Commissic�:r Wanda J.Watson.••: , " :::: '' '' .' �..,. :..... ,... -:°..:.• ... •�`:;_'.:=-Precinct-3 ..- . '°.:=:. -°' ' .. ,::•.: • - -- .Precinct 4: GFAERAL NOTES COORDINATES AND BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON ARE' 0 A :00 ON THE; TEXAS COORDINATE: -SYSTEM OF 19B3, CENTRAL- ZONE 'RAILRDAUR&SE11WON: R 14TA Who FROM OPS OBSERVATION jqo3j,'G iomoffm. A L (WIDTH VARIES R USING INV 1.6111MARTHEr - NA091 ("AID11) -EPOCH 'ZmO •RAILROAD 9EARS 5 7?,4907 E) uk . . . . . . DISTAKE"licia i6ECH ARE 'SURFACE. DISTANCES UNLESS OwTVME NwEQ...TO'QlTAIN,GRID -DISTANCES (NOT.'AREAS) `DIVIDE: I BY COMBINED,. SCALE.' OF 1.000084187 (CALCULATED SINGGEDID12B..; ... . .. 921KEIS MidllliMiff,�0691 AND: USED TO ((M) ANDICATES UNTROWNG ESTABLISH. PROPERTY BOUNDARIES.:- ,iii'IN6,IRON Rdos"4117N BLUE, PLASTIC CAPS 011111 STAMPED-2 'suavEYI9jm 'wIlLt 1E sEr• At .ALL 'ORbPm COMEIIS'UNII.135 OTHERWISE NOTED, THIS SURVEY PLAT WAS PREPAREQ.1111THOUT THE BENEFIT OF'A 5 TITLE COMMITMENT EASEMENTS AND.11THER MATTERS MAY IN 160103r E, APPLY.; 9 'PARCELS ... . .. A731491rW 250.0 :INS SURVEY REFLECTS THEBOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY ONLY. w, "ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMEN113MAY EXIST AND WERE NAT.LQCATEO BLO[Ki 7:... �ATINETIMEDFIHISSURVEK A TH15 PLAT'WAS PREPARED -INi'dNJdNCTIiNl-.WITH -FW NOTES DESCRIPTIONS BOUNDS). THE PLAT AND FIELD NOTES hRE'UdENDED TO BE ONE f4gNMRITTOGMER.- s 7.r4, .2 2Saff:-BLc on C3 ORBCV i bEEd RECORDS OF BRAZOS ::::.Mlwcm %lf aff-OFF. VASHINGTON'STREEr ORBCf,-iDffIEIALR9OROS9F-::" (FORMERLY WASHINGTON STREET) 0.574 ACRE BRmcSCcuoTf- TEXAS" STREET -RIGHT -bF-WAY, pi :...STREET RIGHT. -OF .WAY. P) PROPERTY, MRI ..:.CPRBETji.DFFIEIAL PUBLIC RECORDS. 1ALLS IN pf TEXAS' 12314554VOLUME AND PAGE :NIF iQ WOAFORMERLY Bf PER PLAT OF THE TOWN P ORTIONJ P.0 * 9 ::i.L i'lOPLQTlT;O'F tZ ING! WON ROD TION 06RTlbN* P) nAn SEALE 17:: 100' POINTOV:: BEGINNING .4a Slb POINT OV! BEGINNING CK85 N:1015710732. E-3597476.51 1— 2 • TER •�;: •�:��.a IND cm 's CEL :RE POINT OF::.- . I .. . .: •NO(GA)BEAR' 5 -F s - n41� t" " 0; 1111144N; P/406 (BAB . . . . . . . . of MONT lRtOMgN,*IES 08, 6 OokycT) If MICHAEL, KONETSIQ, R.; 4 PORTION'OJF: •: '29.MDE REM N-73049W.. W 128M REM. ALLEY.(P) IDA Wit FAZ4N 1.12 INTH IRON ROD WITH YELLOW REM. CALLED 0315AERE. E CAP STAMPED IMCCLURE' PLASTI. !:::J2429nO4bRB R ONE! ... .. LOT IR. BLOCK 1. . .. . TOWN. . F MI WCAN .... . . I HEREBY. CERTIFY THAT THIS'SURVEY :TSPS.STANDARD LAND SURVEY PLAT iHTS FOR A'CATEGURY 18, CONDITION, 3. MON. .. .......... UND UNDER MY `ACRf ::0.115 ACRE TRAM 0 574ACRE TRACT; A 0.050' M RIGHT-OF-WCAN WAY 10.749 ACRE TOTAL) .09ING PORTIONS OFUNPWELQP w ....... .70 IN 0 MI 098a.'. Q. VOLOME P, PAGE'484 -ELLIOT. M MILLICAN LEAGI UE WAV6, ABSTRACT'40 MILLICAN, BRAZOS ItoUiTy"I'm 'REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ',LabsuRgEyoRNomm ...... . :MICHML.K0NET8VJ' . .. ... 2023 6 0 0.1 W. ...... mo NUMOEFkUm I MCI HA111:23-04AInfidam POINTRI P NLUIAN-Ohil) (walk a$S)-ALLQaIs-WA-M,' R DRAWN OW.10 0100 W.- MR 1W. % ........... :Wbe0S. 'PHONE- 1979)w.mgs umvsr ... .... ... :.• :- :FIELD NOTESOESERIPTION (KER OFA SURVEYING.. ::. 0.060 ACRE TRACT (PAREEL 1) :. . ••TOWN OF.MILLICAN ..: •: . - • . ELLIOT M MILLI_EAN LEAGUE, SURVEY, ABSTRA[T:40..:.°:° ;:':; :• ' • . • ` •° :-`....• - • . :• •.- : ' ._ MILLKAN, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS':. = ,A:FIELD. NOTES DESCMPTION.OF 0.060 ACRE.IN:THE E.I. M MILLICAN•.LEAGUE.;Si1RVEY, ABSTRACT:40,_IN; MILLICAN;:BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PORTION OF UNDEVELOpFi ALLEY.RI6N%OF=WAY ADIOINIt(6 6LOCK-101 OF.THE TOWN OF MILLIEAN FILED IN VOLUME `P', PAGE 484 Of THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY ......... ..: . •;TEXAS (DRBEA SAID 0.060 AERE BEING MORE PARTIEULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS::::::::: BE6INNINGdt:4.112 inth,iroii;;rod se#,hav-ing:coordinates of N:10,156,900.01 and E:.3,597' 6.61 based on ' f 1• :Texas [oardinate System oi' 1983.(NA083� Central Zone 4Z03 (C 4Z03), (all rods called sei thererri are to be set :. F.` ='with blue plastic'cap stamped ` 90118l1RVE1(MI40 at thecomer: said lot . _o.. 101;:an the:ngrthwest.= .-. -....r . .... ... •.:• .: ... v .. ... . ,..: , : •.•:.••. • c..::•:.. r margm_oi.an undeveloped- :portion of Houston.5ireet (i00 foot.ragl t-44ay; PI484-DR8CT) and tiie northeast ::. ..... :rnargln of a portion of a Block- i01 undeveloped 20 fodt.uuide alley (P1484 DRBR). being"the east corner ereof; on tine of said IfoWon Street and said Ale 'S�16.10 J :: T11EwCE, with the comM . .. y,, •:....... •:.: •.:; distance of ZD.00 feet ta;,:. :; • . : a 12:inch; iron.rod setonahe northeast.11ne of lot 1R, ebtl 1, Tawn:af,Millican as sFiownpn.the plat filed in Uofume 15979, Page 108;(OPRBCT), for reference a 1!2 inch.iron rod found with -yellow plastic ca 5tarn ed ... MCEWRE BROME':marlany he; rioI east corner of said Lot 1R.. 66::5`73° 49'.09'. E a distance o€ 50.00 feet; -':' : • :. HENCE T ,:..:.' ::.::• .:.... , withsaid northeast_ line. of lot.1R, N 730 49 QI°-W a dlstance,o€1Z8.95 feel:#a a i • me iron ro ,. un .:;::,.,:, on the northeast hne of a called 0.315 acrearact.conveyed to lda.MarW�Fazzmq(Z429/30k OPR6CTI and a:corner. .. 'd Lot 15:.... , ..:• _. ...-• • .. - . •- .. .. . - • , .: ;af•Sar .. .. . , ,....... . :THENCE,:Hnth said norttieastaine of 0:315 acre firact;. N.1i° 1Z' Sr E a distance o#?A.Oe feel to=a 112 inch iron rod set marking,a;south comer of -A' portion of l03, Black 10i from which.a 112 rnch iron rod found'markingahe northeast comer of Said 0;315 acre.tract bears N 11' 06':30n.E a dr5tance.of 4.35 f eet; {,.. :..: ::: Z3.5T3M�r8s`IIOWA6adondaac : , . .. • . FIELD NOTE 5�DE5[RIPTION :• •� ; � : -. � . . • :.: :- .:.. • . � ... .• :• : - :off A-:: ••.::�•� :. ,•. �.° •� �.: --:.. . . 0.574 ACME -TRACT IPARCEL Z) TOWN, MILLICAH •�•°°:`.� .:-: -- . •:�;:�:. ;..;�.:. �.:: •:.; .°: �; . ... . .:..::::. :. ..:.. ::4LLIOT-M MILUCAN LEAGUE-SURVEY,'ABSTRACT 40 .:- :. . •VILLICAN. BRAZ [AUNTY TEXAS • .�:-•- �� ;:-`:.::.:., :: �.:: •:: �- :.. -: � �.: •.:::.� .' : •. • :!::A FELO' NOTES: D!S[RIPT{ON OF 0.574:A(RE IN THE ELLlOT M :MILLICAN LEAGUE -SURVEY, -ABSTRACT 0, .. MILLION 'PRAiOSSOUNTfi .:711E IAS, BEING :A PORTION OF UNDEVEIA�EO; AiGHT�OF-WAY:�f-WASHINGTON :" .: :: O'.WlDt;, P14t. MET) AD10lNlNG BLOEt{'!O1 AND BLOCK.85 Of .THE TOWN F:MILLICAN FILED IN ,... STREET (1.0 VOLIIMf PAGE 4114OCTHEDEEDRECORD5OFBRAZOS.COMM.TEKAS(PROU) SAIDOSAALREBEINGMORI; .: ::._ PARTIEULARLY.DESLRIBEO BY.METES AND BOUNDS AS-FOLLQWS:::_- ... - • . •:-.•... - --::-• -- -... ....., ..:. ha • .. Coordinates of IV:� :.: • ::.• ::... ...: - .:: ... ••::.:::... . BEGINNING°at a 1/Z.inch`irari,tpdaet. v�ng : -. -: 10,151;1o73z and E: 3,597,476:51.based an ttir=:,:: • ;'::' ... Texas CooEdmate System of 1983 (I+IAD83) Central Zone-4203 iC-4z03), (ali rods a11ed'set' herem are -to 6e set:.: =. :•:.. , ,• :with Blue plastic cap stamped � KERR-SURVEYING ).at the south corner af.said Lot•108lock 85, an the northweSt margin of arr.undeveloped portion of Houston 5treet (100 #oot nght=of way, PI484 ORBCT) and the northeast:: :..,t9 'PortionP. 9 g. .. :y :. g :. ma m'of•a• of an undevelo ed Washi.n -ton_5treet (100 foot ri :ht-of-wa ;:P/484. ORBCT).bein the east .' :.: ; corner. hereof; ftir referente:ahe 112 inch iron. °set.marking'-the sauth� comerof.Lot 5;: Bl ck 101-:bears:,, •.; •:--:.S-16- •10`•53".:W a distance:of 215,00 feet , ;•• :.`;THENCE; Severing :said undeveldpe right of ;way; S 16'.10, S3. W a distance of 10D:00 feint to the:east corner of` :- ., ........... .......... .. :.:..;::.. ;•:•.:5ard.lot 5, Blodc 101 whichfalls:in a pond;:- : . T.m, -said B _HEN :the:'' rt wmfa.-Whirigton Street,,: , • .: . N TA° 4B' 0T W a distance of 0.0D #eet to:a.V2 inch iron rod set marking the north corner of Lot 1; Blotk 101 the:mtersection of the southeast margin of Mitlican Cut (formerly . ingfalt Street;100 foot right -of ORBCT}Ifflihsard sou#liwest marglo o ;Was .fingt06,5treat;•!.... severing said undeveloped righfi=of-way; N 16° 10' S5' E a tlrslante of 100,OD #eefto a 1/2: inch iron rod ' Set Marl irig�fhe'west comer of lot 6; Block 85;T On of:Mt�lican and marking_the- iitteMktiori of satd southeast right of way of MMican Cut aff wiih,the northeast margin of;Washington.5treet, ..::::.:.. ::. 23-S73.Mfi8s' R8W,AhMdcdAup;. :• ` J :, '•::••: : FIELD NOTES DESCRIPTION'%: : :.. - F A-• ..0.115 ACRE L3 ' • •.:. .•... TRACT (FARCE , j • • ;:::.:::. °•... •.:...:... . TOWN OF MILLICAN. :...... ::... ELLIOT M MILLICAN LEAGUE SURVEY;ABSTRACT.40 ::..:.. :. :.. :..... :•:::.....:::.: .;: ; IdII11.L1[AN, BRAZOS [Ol1NiY;TE}UIS:=: _'.°:. .:-:: •. • ;:. . . _. ARMORS: ON:OF OJIS:,ACREM THE ELL LOT M_MILLICAN-LEAGUE SURVEY, ABsTM[T:40 .IN. : _. MILLI[AN, DRAZ05 COUNTY, TExAS, eEINT A PORTION OF UNDEVELOPED 20 F MADE ALLEY ADJOINING BLOC!( ;. 85 OF-THETOWN OF MILLICAN FILED IN.VOLUME `P',,PAGE 484 OF THE DEED RECORDS Of, :BMAI COUNiYTEIiAS :..(DRBtTj; SAI110.115 ACRE BEING MORE. PARI'ICULARtY DESCRIBED.BY;METE5 AND. BOUNDS AS FOlL.01N5: ' i._ d E3597,514.13bosd o. the;:: _;:inh iron cordiaof N10,1572369n ..: 8G ._e; Texas.Coortl�nate System of 1983NAD833 Central Zorie 4Z03 (C 4203), (all rods tailed set herein are to be set :::.. :. ;.. :... WRh b16e,plasitic•cap stamped *M9 SURVEYING') at the south comer:pf mid Lot 5,:81ock• BS;.on; the: northwest: :.. :: margin .dFa.. undeveloped portion of Ho: n:5t40{100 foot nght-:ofi.-way, P/484 OROM and ahe.riortheast .• margin of said, undeveloped alley, being #tie east corner hereof;..or:re, ereece the 1/2 initr iron roo sef marking - the south corner of Lot S,;Block.101 bears 5169.10' 53" W a distance of 35l? 00 feel v. THENtE;aimiigh card undeveloped right _of way, S16'.10': 53° W a:distana of 20.00 feet to a 112 inch:iron rnd marking the east.co ner of. --aid Lot.5 Block. 05 . ..... ...... THENCE; with'the •northeast Ime of fats 540; 81ack _85.and thesouthinrest_margin of said alley,; N.73° 49' OT' W ;; . ; .a distanra of 250,ODfeetta a 1/2 inch iron rod set marking the, north comer o#Lot 6, Block $5 and the intersection°:= of he 5outheast:right-of-way of: undeveloped.Wmgfall.5freet.(1QQ.footTidht4441. 1484 QR6CT) wrtl said::::::::, ..." .: -:southwest margiriof alley, _ ENCE; thmugh said undeveloped righ#=of-way, N !6°-9D':53'- E a:distance-of 20.00.feet ta,a 1l"2.inch iron rod .. set marking :the west earner of Lot 1, Block 85, Town af:Millitan and°marking:the intersection of said southeast::° :.. margin of Wittgfall Street with the northeast margin of said alley, is . '23-573INS& ROW;A6anduu:aoa.:::: :... . . Kristeen Roe, CTA, PCC Brazos County Tax Assessor/Collector 4151 County Park Ct Bryan TX 77802 979-775-9930 979-775-9938 Fax REFUNDS PENDING' 01/30/2024 REQUESTOR HIGHWAY 30 PARTNERSHIP ADDRESS 4500 CARTER CREEK PKWY STE 105 BRYAN TX 77802 OWNER NAME HIGHWAY 30 PARTNERSHIP PROP ID# 194987 REFUND AMOUNT 1$827.52 REQUESTOR HUNTER RODNEY CARLTON & SARA LEE ADDRESS 4579 SANDPIPER COVE COLLEGE STATION TX 77845 OWNER NAME HUNTER RODNEY CARLTON & SARA LEE .PROPID 33784 REFUND AMOUNT $3394.26 REQUESTOR AMARILLO NATIONAL BANK ADDRESS PO BOX 1 AMARILLO TX 79150 OWNER NAME FRANK & JANIS LERO PROP ID# 443681 REFUND AMOUNT $ 1788.66 REQUESTOR ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT REQUESTOR ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT REQUESTOR. ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT REQUESTOR ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT REQUESTOR ADDRESS OWNER NAME PROP ID# REFUND AMOUNT APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Name Brazos County Tay, Office 4151 County Park Court Bryan, Texas 77802 Ph. 979-775-9930 OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS HIGHWAY 30 PARTNERSHIP ALFRED A MARTIN &'SUDHIR D PATEL 4500 CARTER CREEK PKWY STE 105 BRYAN TX 77802-4464 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Legal: GATEWAY PARK, BLOCK 2, LOT 2 (N 264' OF) Address: ASSOCIATES (PVT) AVE , Account # 94987 TAX PAYMENT INFORMATION Name of Taxing Unit Tax Year of Refund ZREFUND 2023 Taxpayees reason for refund: OP -Overpayment REFUND TO: HIGHWAY 30 PARTNERSHIP ALFRED A MARTIN & SUDHIR D PATEL 4500 CARTER CREEK PKWY STE 105 BRYA14 TX 77802-4464 Collecting Tax for. (taxing entities) Brazos County, City of Bryan, City of College Station Bryan ISD, College Station ISD, F1, F2; F3, F4, City of Kurten, Navasota ISD Payment Date . Amount Paid Refund Amount Requested 01/12/2024 $3822.06 $827.52 Sign below and return form to the Brazos County Tax Office. "4hey apply for the refund of the above -described taxes and certify that the information on this form is true and correct" Date Phone # Email Address If you make a false statement on this application, you could be found guilty of a Class A misdemeanor or a state jail felony under Texas Penal Code Section 37.10. TAX REFUND DETERMINATION and is [Approve ( ] Disapproved Authorized Officer Signature Date alcplai* Authorized Officer of taxing unit for refund applications over amount required under Section 31.11Tax Code Authorized Officer Signature Date AX Fit G L1 N 1 01/12/2024 08:58AM KRISTEEN ROE, CTA PH# (979) 775-9930 BRAZOS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR 4151 COUNTY PARK CT Receipt Number BRYAN, TX 77802 3326228 - Dale Posted - 1?J3U2023 Payment -Type _ P Payment Code OvedRefund Tote! Pald:. ' 53,822.06 BY: HIGHWAY 30 PARTNERSHIP ALFRED A MARTIN & SUDHIR D PATEL 1500 CARTER CREEK PKWY STE 105 BRYAN, TX 77802-4464 Property ID • -Geo Legal Acres Owner Name and Address 94987 289000-0002 0020 0.0000 HIGHWAY 30 PARTNERSHIP Legal Description ALFRED A MARTIN & SUDHIR D PATEL GATEWAY PARK, BLOCK 2, LOT 2_ (N 2" OF) 4500 CARTER CREEK PKWY STE 105 Situs _ DBA Name _ _ BRYAN, TX 77802-4464 ASSOCIATES (PVT) AVE , Entity Year Rate Taxable Value Stmt # Void, Original Tax _ Discnts P&I Att Fees Overage Amount Pd Z REFOND ENTITY 2023 6.00000 0 148784 N 827.52 0.00 0.00 G.00 0.00 827.52 BRAZOS COUNTY 2023 0.40970 202,763 60607 N 650.86 0.00 OAO 0.00 0.00 650.66 CITY OF COLL STAT.1 2023 0.51309 202,763 60607 N 815.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 815.10 COLLEGE STATION ISD 2023 0.96220 202,763 60607 N 1,528.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.528.58 3,822.06 Balance Due As Of 1213112023:-827.52 Tender Details bescription - Amount $heck 5203 SUDHIR & DAMIYANTI PATEL 1911.03 Check 2014 ALFRED A MARTIN 1911.03 3822.06 Operator 9atch _ _ _ - _ -. _ _ . . ,. �. _ . .. _ Total Paid lemerson 49423 (01122024_LE) 3,BM06 Page-1 Receipt issued to Accordance with Section 31.075 of the Texas Property Tax Code T ma res APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office !Name Brazos County Tax Office 4151 County Park Court Bryan, Texas 77802 Ph. 979-775-9930 OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS HUNTER RODNEY CARLTON & SARA LEE 4579 SANDPIPER COVE COLLEGE STATION TX 77845-8768 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Legal: NANTUCKET PH 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 29, ACRES 2.06 Address: 4579 SANDPIPER CV , Account # 33784 TAX PAYMENT INFORMATION Name of Taxing Unit Tax Year of Refund ZREFUND 2023 Taxpayers reason for refund: PAYMENT IN ERROR REFUND TO: HUNTER RODNEY CARLTON & SARA LEE 4579 SANDPIPER COVE COLLEGE STATION TX 77845-8768 Collecting Tax for: {taxing entitles] Brazos County, City of Bryan, City of College Station Bryan ISO, College Station ISO, F1, F2, F3, F4, City of Kurten, Navasota ISO Payment Date Amount Paid Refund Amount Requested 11/27/2023 $3394.26 $3394.26 Sign below and return form to the Brazos County Tax Office. "I hereby apply for the refund of the above -described taxes and certify that the information on this form is true and correct." signature bate Q06- 9 -7 _ _. 6 Ja '� 3 rJjopaw k wals, 97snQ— Phone ## Email Addrgis V e If you makeA false statement on this application, you could be found guilty of a Class A misdemeanor or a state jail felony under Texas Penal Code Section 37.10. TAX REFUND DETERMINATION e tax is Approved �'Dlm�pprcoved • a I Lo laq Authora d Officer Signature Date Authorized Officer of taxing unit for refund applications over amoun%required under Section 31,11 Tax Code Authorized Officer Signature Date tL. 01/26/2024 02:19PM KRISTEEN ROE, CTA PH# (979) 775-9930 BRAZOS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR 4151 COUNTY PARK CT BRYAN, TX 77802 PAID IBY: UNTER RODNEY CARLTON & SARA LEE 579 SANDPIPER COVE OLLEGE STATION, TX 77845-8768 Receipt Number 3277367 Date Posted : -`'T- 1112712023 Payment Type = I_ P Payment Code' } Full Total Pald _ -_--_ _ S3,394_26_ 4 Proeert)I ID _ Geo a _ L'_egal Acres , _ �� r_ ;Ouitner_Narr� a dAddtess_ 3378 434000-0001-0290 - —-- 2.0600 HUNTER RODNEY CARLTON & SASARA LEE -' __ Legal Description _ _ �— --' ^ 4579 SANDPIPER COVE _ _ _ _ _ —__1 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845-8768 NANTUCKET PH 1, BLOCK 1_ LOT 29, ACR_ES 2.06 -- §Itu-S - -= t --- --_ __ _ DBA Name - - - ---- 4529 SANDPIPER CV , i Entityl _ ._ -� Year _Rate Taxa_bl_e Value - _Stmt # _ _ Void' _ Original Tax _D_i_s_c_nts-_ _'P&l - Att Fees _OGerr4 Arri_outit Pd: -- - EMG SVCS DIST #1 2023 _: 0.02071 487,465 64263 N 50.48 D.00 0.0I 0.06 0.00 80.48 BRAZOS COUNTY 2023 0.40970 487,465 64263 N 998.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 998.58 COLLEGE STATION ISD 2023' 0.96220 487,465 64263 N 2,345.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.345.20 3,394.26 Balance Due As Of 1112712023: 3394.23 Desc_r_ipti_o_n__ �`_ _ .._'.Amount, Check 3583 3394.26 3394.26 Operator Batch'-- ---_---.- -- --- --- - �--- - — ----- -- .. _�.:_ �• _ "I[otill Paidj kmeyer 48583 (11127/2023 KVM) 3,394.26 Page,1 Receipt Issued in Accordance with Section 31.075 of the Texas Property Tax Code Tmxftme t- APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Name Brazos County Tax Office 4151 County Park Court Bryan, Texas 77802 Ph. 979-775.9930 OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS LERO FRANK J & JANIS A 8082 SANDY POINT RD BRYAN TX 77807-8190 Collecting Tax for: (taxing entities) Brazos County, City of Bryan, City of College Station Bryan ISD, College Station ISD, F1, FZ, F3, F4, City of Kurten, Navasota ISD PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Legal: A021900, FRANCIS W SMITH, TRACT 2.1A,1.0 ACRES, [AKA TR 2 P J MERKA EST PARTITION] Address: 8088 SANDY POINT RD., Account # 443681 TAX PAYMENT INFORMATION Name of Taxing Unit Tax Year of Refund Payment Date Amount Paid Refund Amount Requested ZREFUND _ 2023 22/29/2023 $3940.24 $1788.66 Taxpayer's reason for refund: OP -Overpayment REFUND TO: AMARILLO NATIONAL BANK PO BOX 1 AMARILLO, TX 79150 Sign below and return form to the Brazos CountyTax. Office. "I hereby apply for the refund of the above -described taxes and certify that the information an this farm Is true and correct," 5 naI Phone k Wall Address if you make a false statement on this application, you could be found guilty of a Class A misdemeanor or a state ]all felony under Texas Penal Code Section 37.10. TAX REFUND e tax re DETER ION pi roveDisapproved Authorize Officer Signature Date Authorized Officer of taxing unit for refund applications over amount required under Section 31.21 Tax Code Authorized Officer Signature Date 04:22PM KRISTEEN ROE, CTA PH# (979) 775-9930 BRAZOS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR 4151 COUNTY PARK CT BRYAN, TX 77802 BY: AMARILLO NATIONAL BANK PO BOX 1 AMARILLO, TX 79105 Recap N6m5er . ' 333.4.40_2 l`late i�osted— i0812023 Payment Type P Payment,Code _ Ov_erlfiefund Total Pald _ : _ _ _ 3,940.24 Property ID r Geo ^ -'~ - - �_ - 'Legal A_cre_s__ ^_ r-_- -_ 6- Wner Nfame a_nd Address _ 443681 ~ 021900-0002-0011 . _' . �r 1.0000 ~ LERO FRANK J & JANIS A' r ' '" " —" -'- '" i 8082 SANDY POINT RD Legal D'escriptiori `-" `. BRYAN, TX 77807-8190 A02190Sites0, FRANCIS W SMITH, TRACT 2.1A,1.0 ACRES, [AKATR 2 P J MERKA EST PARTITION] _ - - . --, • • -- • �bBA I�tgme - - ---- -- .-` • -- -- - i 8088 SANDY POINT RA • 'Year— _Rate _ Taxab_le Value StmL # V_olc�, _ OTax_ '- _Dl9_d_nts P&1 _Att Fees Oyera�e_Ambu_nt Pd' Z REFUND ENTITY 2023 0.00000 0 148883 N 1,7a s 0.00 oA0 0.00 0.00 1,7888.86 EMG SVCS DIST #4 2023 0.05206 239,973 77152 N 124.94 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 124.94 BRYAN ISD 2023 0.94920 142,302 77162 N 1,360.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,360.74 BRAZOS COUNTY 2023 0.40970 164.973 77152 N 676.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 675.90 3,940.24 Balance Due As Of 1212912023:-1788.66 ']ender _ - _••' Detei(s_,_ _- •,•__� •_ _ __Y_ _•-_, _� M_DeBcr_[ptio�^•„-_-T`_��•gmounr; Check repast 39940.24 3940.24 Operator Bateh = — _-` ,ti _ 7otal.Pald. ahines 49701 (Correotl6n'Batch_AmarIII0 [National Sank 01292024) Page:1 Receipt Issued in Accordance with Section 31,075 of the Texas Property Tax Code n MAU=V�ue. BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AM ENDMENT(S) FOR THE 2023-2024 BUDGET YEAR NO.23/24 18.01-18.06 On this the 61h day of February 2024 at a regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court, the following members were present: A. Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding B. Steve Aldrich, Commissioner, Precinct 1 C. Chuck Konderla, Commissioner, Precinct 2 D. Nancy Berry, Commissioner, Precinct 3 E. Wanda Watson, Commissioner, Precinct 4 F. Karen McQueen, County Clerk The following proceedings were held: THAT WHEREAS, on 61' day of February 2024 the Court heard and approved a budget amendment(s) for the 2023-2024 budget year for Brazos County, Texas; and WHEREAS, expenditure is necessary due to the necessity to meet unusual and unforeseen conditions which could not be reasonably included in the original budget adopted 19 September 2023, the following amendment(s) to the original budget are hereby authorized, as described on the attached page(s). ADOPTED AND APPROVED this the 66, day of February 2024. THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. By: Duane Peters, County Judge Original: County Clerk's Office and Attached to the original budget BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23124 -18.01 2/6/2024 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE General Permanent Improvement Fund Commissioners' Court - Capital Supplies and Other Charges Expenditure 1,652.40 General Permanent Improvement Fund County Records Management Capital Capital Outlay Expenditure 1,652.40 General Permanent Improvement Fund Reallocation in at $14,652.40. of funds to correct accounts due to additional funding to purchase two (2) Kodak Scanners. This project w oved for $13,000.00 but the quote came SAM', Date: 1/3012024. _ CountyJudgeApproval _ Date _ For oracliEntry Onlya FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 45000 63110001 61130000 (1,652.40) 45000 63500001 80281000 1,652.40 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23124 -18.02 2/6/2024 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE General Fund Contingency Supplies and Other Charges Expenditure I,500.00 General Fund Juvenile Court Referee Supplies and Other Charges Expenditure 680.00 General Fund Juvenile Court Referee Contractual Services Expenditure 820.00 Juvenile Court Referee Reallocation of funds to correct accounts to upgrade recording equipment for the Juvenile Court Referee. SAMi a co`aq, .Date. 211/2024' —_County Judge Approval Date For Otaele Entry Only FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 01000 11001500 61130000 (1,500.00) 01000 22500100 60500000 680.00 01000 22500100 71025000 820.00 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23/24 -18.03 2/6/2024 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE 2020 Certificates of Obligation Roof Repair Sheriffs Office Contractual Services Expenditure 10,000.00 2020 Certificates of Obligation Courthouse Roof Repair Contractual Services Expenditure 10,000.00 2020 Certificates of Obligation Reallocation of funds to correct accounts for additional work needed on Courthouse roo£ SAME Date: ----- -- -- -----2/1/2024 rttyJudgeApproval Date For Oracle Entry Ont - FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget. ACCOUNT NAME 43200 63432280 71025000 (10,000.00) 43200 63432400 71025000 10,000.00 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23/24 -18.04 21612n2d FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE General Permanent Improvement Fund Sheriff Office - Jail - Capital Capital Outlay Expenditure 8,388.00 General Permanent 1m rovement Fund Community Supervision Support - Capital Capital Outlay Expenditure 8,388.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Permanent Improvement Fund Reallocation of funds to correct accounts to purchase a copier for Community Supervision &MW unty Su Date: _ _ _._ 2/1/2024, County_Judge App val _ - Date For•Orac Xi Onl. -, I FUND DIV 'ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 45000 63280021 80230000 (8,388.00) 45000 63260010 80230000 8,388.00 l I I I I I I I ' I I I BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 23/24 -18.05 2/6/2024 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE On System Road Bond - TxDOT Leonard Road Contractual Services Expenditure 1,685,576.00 On System Road Bond - TxDOT North 2818 Contractual Services Expenditure 1,494,547.00 On System Road Bond - TxDOT Bush/Wellborn Contractual Services Expenditure 3,736,367.00 On System Road Bond - TxDOT William D. Fitch Contractual Services Expenditure 3,985,758.00 On System Road Bond - TxDOT Harvey Road Contractual Services Expenditure 140,062.00 On System Road Bond - TxDOT Inner Lop East Contractual Services Expenditure 11,042,310.00 i On System Road Bond - TxDOT Reallocation of funds to correct accounts for additional funding for Inner Loop East Project. SAME al Date: 2/1/2024 _ County Judge Approve _ _ _^ Date For Oracle Entry Oaly FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 43230 63432306 71025000 (1,685,576.00) 43230 63432307 71025000 (1,494,547.00) 43230 63432308 71025000 (3,736,367.00) 43230 63432309 71025000 (3,985,758.00) 43230 63432311 71025000 (140,062.00 43230 63432304 71025000 11,042,310.00 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMEM•S No. 23/24 -18.06 216/2n24 FUND NAME DEPARTMENT NAME CLASS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CATEGORY INCREASE DECREASE General Permanent Improvement Fund Community Supervision Support - Capital Capital Outlay Expenditure 143,108.00 General Permanent Improvement Fund Health Department Support - Capital Capital Outlay Expenditure 143,I08.00 I General Permanent Improvement Fund Reallocation of funds to correct accounts due to a new division being created for Health Department Support - Ca i SAMI .Date•I, - _ ---- 2J1/2024; County Judge ApprovalY. Data FUND DIV ACCT Change in Budget ACCOUNT NAME 45000 63260010 80380000 (143,108.00) 45000 63260020 80380000 143,108.00 PERSONNEL . CHANGE OF STATUS REQUESTS Commissioner Court Date: 02-06-2024 Department Submitting Information:, Human Resources Purpose of Submissions: Consider and Take Action on Change Requests Submitting Employee Request Applies To Shop — Light Equipment Garcia, Richard Office — Jail Brotsch, Emily . Smith, Lawonder pproved in Commissioners' Court: 02-06-2024: ty Judge's or Commissioner's Signature: Copy to be attached to minutes) Action Requested Change of Status Change of Status Change of Status Personnel Change of Status (Feb 1, 2024 ) Commissioners' Court 02-06-2024 'Department Submitting Human Resources � Purpose of Submissions: Consider and Take Action on Change Employment i�d MR IRA,, D partmidritN el I* W e Name` p T z� Bartolomel, Anna -Marie Sheriff Office - Jail Administration Kissee, Johnathan Infdrmation Technology - Administration Losack, Jerome Jr. Sheriff Office - Jail Administration Sanchez, Nathan Brazos Center - Administration K-4 w-,7 A �.T ;AY Separations Employee'lame�-,qr,�,��,;'%�-�, Human Resources - SIssamls, Frances Administration x tie 4��n-' - PQ�, , i gM Y e, ", Approved in Commissioners' Court: 02-06-20 County Judge's or Commissioner's Signature: K!: (This Copy to be attached to minutes)