HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-09-26 10:00 AM REGULAR MEETINGBRAZOS COUNTY
BRYAN,TEXAS
NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA
BRAZOS
BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT
THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY WILL MEET
IN REGULAR SESSION ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 AT 10:00 AM IN
THE COMMISSIONERS COURTROOM OF THE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 200 SOUTH TEXAS AVE., SUITE 106,
BRYAN, TX 77803
Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
- U.S. and Texas Flag - Chaplain G.H. Jones and Commissioner Catalena
2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns
Consider and take action on agenda items 3-23:
Resolution 17-021 naming the Brazos County building at 300 E. William Joel Bryan
Parkway the Ruth McLeod Building.
Proclamation 17-026 declaring Tuesday, October 3, 2017 as "National Night Out'.
Re -appointment of Lloyd Wassermann and Sammy Catalena to the Brazos County
Emergency District (9-1-1) Board; term of appointment is 01/01/2018 through
12/3112019.
Request the Courrs approval for an Inmate Work Crewto be detailed to assist the City
of Wixon Valley with preparations for National Night Out
Workers Compensation Renewal with TAC Risk Management Pool's Workers'
Compensation Program effective January 1, 2018.
Payment Authorization to STL & Associates in the amount of $13,500.00 for appraisals
for Forsthoff Road widening project; a purchase order was obtained in advance but was
closed prematurely.
Payment authorization to Aramark Uniform Services, I nc. in the amount of $122.70 for
rental uniform expenses for Fleet Services; a purchase order was obtained in advance
but did not have enough funds on it to cover the expenses.
Vol. , Pg. 2,9
10. Payment authorization to RV Tires LLC in the amount of $1,632.12 for repair work to be
done on shower trailers for Emergency Management; a purchase order was obtained in
advance but did not have enough funds on it to cover the expenses.
11. Approval of the following job descriptions:
• a. Class Code 2355 - Clerk, Temporary for the Tax Office
• b. Class Code 2668 - Tech. Temporary for Road & Bridge
12. Consultant Services Agreement between Brazos County and MFE, LLC.
13. Fifth Renewal Lease Agreement with Brazos County Emergency Services District #1 for
the purpose of a substation of the Brazos County Sheriffs Office in southern Brazos
County, Texas for FY2018.
14. Discuss and take possible action on a contract renewal with Youth Advocate Programs
I nc. for wraparound youth and family services.
15. Acceptance of Public Utility Easement from Brent Mullins and Leisha S. Mullins for 0.04!
acre of land to replace part of public utility easement acquired for roadway right of way of
Cherokee Drive located in Precinct 1.
16. Consider and take action on the Frontier Communications utility permit to conduct a 285'
bore within the right of way of Smetana Road. Work will include placing a 4" PVC
conduit a depth of 4 feet below the proposed drainage ditch. Cables will be pulled
through this conduit. Line is being adjusted to accommodate the widening of Smetana
Road. Site is located in Precinct 4.
17. Expenditure Journal Entries 16/17 090064
18. Tax Refund Applications for the following:
• a. Billie & Carolyn Francis - Overpayment $19.72
• b. Chase Bank % Corelogic Tax Service - Overpayment $63.17
• c. Corelogic Tax Services - Overpayment $7.96
• d. Thomas W. Grahm - Overpayment $76.30
19. Budget Amendments.
Budget Amendments FY 16/17 52.1 - 52.4
20. Personnel Change of Status.
a. Personnel Action Forms for FY17
b. Personnel Action Forms FY18
21. Payment of Claims.
22. Convene into Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code 551.0785 for
deliberations involving medical or psychiatric records of a county employee.
23. Consider and possible action on Executive Session.
24. Sheriffs report on inmate population.
25. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics.
26. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns
27. Adjourn.
Vol. 5�/` pg.
1
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public Comment during the Commission Meeting may be for all matters, both on and off the agenda, and be limited to four
minutes per person. Persons are invited to submit comments in writing on the agenda items and/or attend and make comment at
the Commission meeting. Members of the public are reminded that the Breams County Commissioners Court is a Constitutional
Court, with both judicial and legislative powers, created under Article V, Section 1 and Section 18 of the Texas Constitution. As a
Constitutional Court, the Brazos County Commissioners Court also possesses the power to issue a Contempt of Court Citation
under Section 81.024 of the Texas Local Government Code. Accordingly, members of the public in attendance at any Regular,
Special and/or Emergency meeting of the Court shall conduct themselves with proper respect and decorum in speaking to,
andlor addressing the Court; in participating in public discussions before the Court; and in all actions in the presence of the
Court. Those members of the public who are inappropriately attired and/or who do not conduct themselves in an orderly and
appropriate manner will be ordered to leave the meeting. Refusal to abide by the Court's Order andlor continued disruption of
the meeting may result in a Contempt of Court Citation.
It is not the intendon of the Brains County Commissioners Court to provide a public forum for the demeaning of any individual or
group. Neither is it the intention of the Court to allow a member (or members) of the public to insult the honesty and/or integrity of
the Court, as a body, or any member or members of the Court, or County employees, individually or collectively. Accordingly,
profane, insulting or threatening language directed toward the Court andlor any person in the Court's presence and/or racial,
ethnic or gender slurs or epithets will not be tolerated. Violation of these rules may result in the following sanctions:
1. cancellation of a speaker's time;
2. removal fnm the Commissioners Court;
3. a Contempt Citation; andlor
4. such other andlor criminal sanctions as may be authorized
under the Constitution, Statutes and Codes of the Sate of Texas.
The County Commissioners Court can deliberate or take action only if a matter has been listed on an agenda properly posted
prior to the meeting. During the public comment period, speakers may address matters not listed on the published agenda. The
Open Meeting Law does not expressly prohibit responses to public comments by the Commissioners Court. However, responses
from the County Judge or Commissioners to unlisted public comment topics could become deliberation on a matter without notice
to the public. To ensure the public has notice of all matters the Commissioners Court will consider, the County Judge andlor
Commissioners may choose not to respond to public comments, except to correct factual inaccuracies, recite existing policy in
response to an inquiry or to ask that a matter be listed on a future agenda. See Texas Open Meetings Act Section 551.042.
INVOCATION
Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Court meeting shall be to and for the benefit of the Court. The
views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Court and do not
necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Court in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to
attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of
the Court.
The Commissioners Courtroom of the County Administration Building, 200 South Teles Ave., Suite 106, Bryan, TX77803 is
wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made two
working days before the meeting. To make arrangements, please call (979) 3614102.
E
�� P9 V- /
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 26, 2017
BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT
REGULAR MEETING
A regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court of Brazos County, Texas was held in the
Brazos County Commissioners Courtroom in the Administration Building, 200 South
Texas Avenue, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas, beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday,
September 26, 2017 with the following members of the Court present:
Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding;
Steve Aldrich, Commissioner of Precinct 1;
Sammy Catalena, Commissioner of Precinct 2;
Nancy Berry, Commissioner of Precinct 3;
Irma Cauley, Commissioner of Precinct 4;
Karen McQueen, County Clerk.
The attached sheets contain the names of the citizens and officials that were in
attendance.
Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
- U.S. and Texas Flag - Chaplain G.H. Jones and Commissioner Catalena
2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns
Marie Wolfe, who is a resident of the Nantucket subdivision requested the County
withdraw its application to the City of College Station for realigning Margraves Ranch
Minor Collector on Arrington Road to Harpers Ferry Road. The realignment will allow
Margraves Ranch and Castlegate residents to cut-thru the Nantucket Subdivision. She
said the application for the realignment is scheduled for the City of College Station's
Planning and Zoning Meeting on October 5, 2017 and for the City Council on October
12, 2017. Mrs. Wolfe also pointed out several concerns with the timeline of the
application. She asked why other options were not considered. Mrs. Wolfe said the
Vol. 5 pg.�
neighborhood streets were not designed for cut-thru traffic. She went on to say that they
have no sidewalks, no shoulders, and have drainage ditches on both sides of the roads.
She said that her main concern is for the safety of the residents and does not feel that
anyone else is addressing these issues.
Nantucket resident Karen Weir then asked to speak and also requested the Court
withdraw the application for the realignment of Arrington Road. Mrs. Weir said that she
knew their decision had already been made. She stated that those who will be affected
by their decision are collateral damage and are expendable. Mrs. Weir urged the Court
to not fall for the expansionism theory and preserve what they have.
Speaking next was Nantucket resident Mary Lou Price. Mrs. Price stated that residents
found out about the realignment one week ago. She said that Mrs. Wolfe emailed Jason
Shubert with the City of College Station questions regarding public notices. Mrs. Price
stated that Commissioner Aldrich and County Engineer Alan Munger were copied in the
email. She said that Mr. Shubert stated several times that the realignment request came
from Brazos County. She commented that she has searched through Commissioners
Court minutes and has not been able to find contracts for this project with Mitchell &
Morgan or Kimley-Hom. She said she is baffled as to why these contracts would not
have been approved through the normal agenda process. She went on to say that she
also questions the timeline of the application. Mrs. Price said the residents of Nantucket
have requested from the elected officials in the county and city to allow them to have a
voice in developments that impact the safety of the neighborhood. She said that no one
has given them the courtesy of allowing them a chance to speak. She stated her
concerns over the road safety for the residents that are walkers and bike riders. Mrs.
Price said that Nantucket was designed to be a rural neighborhood. She stated that she
understands the need for growth and development, but it should be planned in harmony
with neighborhoods in mind. Mrs. Price said that monitoring traffic conditions and
responding appropriately does not give her comfort. She said she has been left with a
lack of distrust and disgust for a lot of the elected officials and staff.
Susan Hardin, also a resident of Nantucket spoke next. Mrs. Hardin pointed out that the
Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) did an outstanding job
soliciting the public's input with the 2050 Thoroughfare Plan. She said the MPO
scheduled several meetings around Brazos County to gain input from the public. She
encouraged everyone to read the documents on their web page regarding public input.
Mrs. Hardin went on to mention her concerns for those who could possibly be rear-ended
as they are turning into their driveways. She also pointed out issues with the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. Mrs. Hardin said that most importantly is
that the public was not allowed an opportunity to voice comments on these changes. She
urged the Court to withdraw the proposed changes.
Mrs. Marie Wolfe and Mrs. Mary Lou Price both submitted documents to the Court for
the record and are attached to these minutes.
Judge Peters thanked everyone for their input and reminded them that the Court cannot
respond to the comments.
Judge Peters then introduced Christiana Stahl as the new medical clerk for the Health
and Wellness Clinic.
Vol. Pg. 11�
Consider and take action on agenda items 3-23:
3. Resolution 17-021 naming the Brazos County building at 300 E. William Joel Bryan
Parkway the Ruth McLeod Building.
The Court voted unanimously to adopt Resolution 17-021 designating the Brazos County
building at 300 E. William Joel Bryan Parkway to be known now and hereafter as the
Ruth McLeod Building. The Court expresses their deepest appreciation for Mrs.
McLeod's distinguished service for over 50 years to Brazos County.
Commissioner Berry said she thought this was a great idea because Ruth McLeod has
been a valuable long term employee.
Judge Peters read aloud the resolution and presented it to Mrs. McLeod.
Mrs. McLeod thanked the Court for this honor and Commissioner Catalena for
recommending the building to be named for her. She also thanked her family, friends,
and co-workers for all their support over the years.
Commissioner Catalena thanked her for all the help and knowledge she has provided to
him.
Budget Officer Irene Jett stated that Ruth McLeod has a vast knowledge of many
positions and departments in the County. She thanked Mrs. McLeod for all she does to
help others.
Commissioner Aldrich also expressed his appreciation for Mrs. McLeod and thanked
her.
A copy of the resolution is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by
Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley,
Peters.
4. Proclamation 17-026 declaring Tuesday, October 3, 2017 as "National Night Out".
The Court voted unanimously to adopt
as "National Night Out" in Brazos Cour
of Bryan, College Station, Texas A&M
citizens of Brazos County to join th
Association of Town Watch in supp
Tuesday, October 3, 2017.
A copy of the proclamation is attached.
Proclamation 17-026 declaring October 3, 2017
y. The Court along with the mayors of the Cities
Jniversity, Wixon Valley, and Kurten call upon the
)ir law enforcement officers and the National
irting the 34th annual "National Night Out" on
Vol. -`"Y Pg. e/zl
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by
Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley,
Peters.
5. Re -appointment of Lloyd Wassermann and Sammy Catalena to the Brazos County
Emergency District (9-1-1) Board; term of appointment is 01/01/2018 through
12/31/2019.
A copy of the affidavit of abstention for Commissioner Catalena is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Steve Aldrich, Seconded by County J udge
Duane Peters. Passed. 4-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Cauley, Peters. Abstain: Catalena.
6. Request the Court's approval for an Inmate Work Crew to be detailed to assist the City
of Wixon Valley with preparations for National Night Out
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by
Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley,
Peters.
Workers Compensation Renewal with TAC Risk Management Pool's Workers'
Compensation Program effective January 1, 2018.
A copy is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner I rma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner
Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
8. Payment Authorization to STL & Associates in the amount of $13,500.00 for appraisals
for Forsthoff Road widening project; a purchase order was obtained in advance but was
closed prematurely.
This payment authorization was requested by the Road and Bridge Department.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by
Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley,
Peters.
9. Payment authorization to Aramark Uniform Services, Inc. in the amount of $122.70 for
rental uniform expenses for Fleet Services; a purchase order was obtained in advance
but did not have enough funds on it to cover the expenses.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner
Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
10. Payment authorization to RV Tires LLC in the amount of $1,632.12 for repair work to be
done on shower trailers for Emergency Management; a purchase order was obtained in
advance but did not have enough funds on it to cover the expenses.
Vol. Pg.5.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner
Irma Cauley. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
11. Approval of the following job descriptions:
• a. Class Code 2355 - Clerk, Temporary for the Tax Office
• b. Class Code 2668 - Tech. Temporary for Road & Bridge
A copy of the job descriptions is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner
Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
12. Consultant Services Agreement between Brazos County and MFE, LLC.
A copy of the service agreement is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by
Commissioner Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley,
Peters.
13. Fifth Renewal Lease Agreement with Brazos County Emergency Services District #1 for
the purpose of a substation of the Brazos County Sheriff's Office in southern Brazos
County, Texas for FY 2018.
A copy of the renewal of lease agreement is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Steve Aldrich, Seconded by Commissioner
Sammy Catalena. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
14. Discuss and take possible action on a contract renewal with Youth Advocate Programs
Inc. for wraparound youth and family services.
A copy of the renewal of contract is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner I rma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner
Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
15. Acceptance of Public Utility Easement from Brent Mullins and Leisha S. Mullins for 0.04!
acre of land to replace part of public utility easement acquired for roadway right of way of
Cherokee Drive located in Precinct 1.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Steve Aldrich, Seconded by Commissioner
Sammy Catalena. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
16. Consider and take action on the Frontier Communications utility permit to conduct a 285'
bore within the right of way of Smetana Road. Work will include placing a 4" PVC
Vol. Pg,
conduit a depth of 4 feet below the proposed drainage ditch. Cables will be pulled
through this conduit. Line is being adjusted to accommodate the widening of Smetana
Road. Site is located in Precinct 4.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Irma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner
Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
17. Expenditure Journal Entries 16/17 090064
A copy is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner
Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
18. Tax Refund Applications for the following:
• a. Billie & Carolyn Francis -Overpayment $19.72
• b. Chase Bank % Corelogic Tax Service -Overpayment $63.17
• c. Corelogic Tax Services -Overpayment $7.96
• d. Thomas W. Grahm -Overpayment $76.30
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Irma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner
Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
19. Budget Amendments.
Budget Amendments FY 16/17 52.1 -52.4
52.1 Reallocate funds for the 85th District Court.
52.2 Reallocate funds for the Sheriff's Office -Jail.
52.3 Transfer funds from Contingency Fund to the Brazos Center.
52.4 Reallocate funds for Fleet Services.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner
Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
20. Personnel Change of Status.
a. Personnel Action Forms for FY17
b. Personnel Action Forms FY18
A copy of the Personnel Change of Status requests for a and b is attached.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Irma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner
Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
b'ol. "z`S Pg iZ'7
21. Payment of Claims.
Claims 7159676-7159865
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by
Commissioner Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley,
Peters.
22. Convene into Executive Session pursuant to Texas Government Code 551.0785 for
deliberations involving medical or psychiatric records of a county employee.
At this point, the County Judge announced the Court would consider items 24 through 26
then return to convene into Executive Session.
Having considered the previously noted agenda items, at 10:38 a.m. the County Judge
stated that the Court would convene into Executive Session to deliberate pursuant to
Texas Government Code 551.0785 as stated above.
The following individuals were asked to stay for the meeting:
Candy Gallego, Executive Assistant
Bruce Erratt, Civil Counsel
Ed Bull, Civil Counsel
Jennifer Salazar, Human Resources Director
23. Consider and possible action on Executive Session.
At 10:50 a.m. the County Judge announced the meeting open to the public. On motion
by Commissioner Berry, seconded by Commissioner Cauley, the Court voted
unanimously to extend the deadline for the Wellness Plan for a certain retiree due to the
effects of Hurricane Harvey.
Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner
Irma Cauley. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters.
24. Sheriff's report on inmate population.
Sheriff Chris Kirk stated there were 686 inmates in jail, 592 inmates are male and 94 are
female, 46 have electronic monitors and 3 are pending for monitors.
25. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics.
Commissioner Aldrich stated that he met with the new executive director of Research
Valley Partnership and would like to see a presentation of the RVP Strategic Plan placed
on a future agenda.
26. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns
There was no citizen's input.
27. Adjourn.
Fp
72S7_ Pg. ��'
The foregoing minutes of the Commissioners Court meeting held September 26. 2017
have been examined and are approved in open Court this 10th day of October, 2017, in
Bryan, Brazos County, Texas.
Duane Peters
County Judge
Sammy Catalena
Commissioner, Precinct 2
Commissioner,
Attest:
a
Steve Aldrich
Commissioner, Precinct 1
Nancy Berry 0a
Commissioner, Precinct 3
VO I. a2 Pg.4457
P2 of 3
BRAZOS COUNTY
CONV&S SIONER' S COURT
DAY OF�, 20
0 :400
Name
am
Organization
(PLEASE PRN70
/e I -Ii e,-,
—
( �eSSrkf 'u-nu�h� ui--
JAS�,ti
0-m 6C►z-� IL'I
te, Lvoi-
QCE n, ---3' p9•
Pe�R-o?-
BRAZOSCOUNTY
CONMSSIONER'S COURT
DAY OF
AM/PM,
Name
(PLEASE PRINT)
c S'lMs
Organization
(PLEASE PRIN-n
C
14 '4- W-9 P "Js
LtA
b
Vol. C;k Pg.
Name
PC 3 0=�L
BRAZOS COUNTY
COMMS SIONER' S COURT
DAY OF,- S
10"00
fru`
� nrn M99 �e�n�
t4-ht� ,,�r
M9
201'7
Organization
(PLFpA,SF PRINTS
A% -Al
• • �.!
Marie E. Wolfe
4576 Sandpiper Cove
College Station, TX 77845
z
I'm here today to request the County withdraw its application to the City for
realigning Margraves Ranch Minor Collector on Arrington Road to Harpers Ferry
Road which will allow Margraves Ranch and Castlegate to cut-thru our
neighborhood.
The application for this realignment is scheduled for the City's P&Z Meeting for
October 5th and City Council for October 12th and was initiated by the County
Engineer.
I'm also putting into the record my email request for this withdrawal dated
September 24, 2017 and its attachments.
As for the application, that has an interesting timeline:
Veronica Morgan of Mitchell & Morgan, LLP signed application August 17th
Jeffrey Whitacre's, P.E., AICP, PTP; Report from Kimley Horn to Veronica
Morgan, was dated September 7th
R. Alan Munger, PE, County Engineer signed application on September 11th.
September 18, 2017 – I read a Public Notice in the Eagle about this realignment
and when it's scheduled for P&Z and City Council Meetings and sent off an email
to a number of Nantucket residents to discover that there was a meeting
scheduled that morning to discuss Arrington Road expansion, but they didn't
know about the realignment.
September 18, 2017 is the first known meeting with a few Nantucket residents to
discuss Arrington Road expansion.
There are issues with the application and TIA letter that need to be addressed.
1. Why weren't all possible alternatives researched/study?
2. Why is one 3 -way intersection on Arrington Road an issue when its 1500
feet away and you could fit 100 cars into those 1500 feet? Why does the
safety of Arrington Road, trump the safety of our neighborhood streets?
We have eight 3 -way intersections with the closest set being 150 feet apart
and the farthest distant being 830 feet, plus 20 driveways entering within
that same stretch of road.
3. Why aren't the total volumes of vehicles/trips on the 2 comparison maps
equal? Not aligned is 55,600 & aligned is 61,300 – difference of 5,700.
4. Why was the same individual/firm used by the Margraves Ranch
Developer and the County for the application (Veronica Morgan) and TIA
(Jeff Whitacre)? Seems like there wasn't any check and balance on data.
— Pg. –57
`r- . =p
5. Why doesn't the study have details to back up the maps data that people
can read?
I've been here before focusing on cut-thru traffic from Indian Lakes which was an
unintended consequence of not requiring that Developer to have 2
entrances/exits. The Commissioners Court approved extending Mesa Verde to
Hwy 6 to help mitigate our roadway safety issues. Now the County is facilitating
cut-thru from both Margraves Ranch (950-1480 homes) and Castlegate 1 (721
homes) thru Nantucket. This is not acceptable when there are other alternatives
that should be considered.
The report done by Jeff Whitacre of Kimley Horn says the realignment will bring
our traffic counts to 2,200 on Harpers Ferry. In January 2016 with just Indian
Lakes, we had between 600-650 vehicles/day. The County Engineer promises
they will do traffic counts and if something needs to be done, they will address
the issue then. "Then" will be too late. The harm will have been done and the
options limited.
Our neighborhood streets are not designed to be Minor Collectors for cut-thru
traffic. We have no sidewalks, no shoulders, drainage ditches on both sides of
the road; our driveways entering directly onto these roads and you must travel
Harpers Ferry Road to access our neighborhood park. While Castlegate and
Margraves Ranch streets will be designed to Minor Collector specifications, ours
is what it is and I don't see anyone focusing on our neighborhood roadway safety
issues.
I've also heard rumors that the County Engineer is leaving shortly, if true, he'll be
gone when the issues arise. I'm here because I don't want to wait for something
bad to happen before any action is taken. Who will be held responsible when a
tragedy happens caused by cut-thru traffic?
Again, please withdraw the application submitted to the City to realign Margraves
Ranch collector with Harpers Ferry Road until all alternatives have been
considered with neighborhood pedestrian safety the #1 issue to be resolved with
citizen input.
Vol. :iS -- p9•'
Subject:
From:
Request for County to withdraw the City application- CPA2017-000012 - Realignment of Margreve's
Ranch Minor Collector to Harpers Ferry Road
Marie Wolfe (me wolfe@yahoo.com)
To: RAMunger@brazoscountytx.gov; SAldrich(QbrazoscounW.gov; DPeters@brazoscountytx.gov;
scatelena@brazoscountytx.gov; icauley@brazoscountytx.gov; nberry@brazoscountytx.gov;
Cc: shardinTX@gmail.00m; mprice212@yahoo.com; Motherweir@hotmail.com;
Date: Sunday, September 24, 2017 5:32 PM
Dear Judge, County Engineer and Commissioners,
This email is to request that Brazos County withdraw its application to the City of College Station (CPA2017-
000012) to realign Margrave's Ranch Minor Collector to Harpers Ferry Road.
I appreciate the County Engineer response which I'm including. I also appreciate the need to reconstruct
Arrington Road. However, acquiring the ROW should not be affected wherever Margraves Ranch minor collector
Intersects Arrington Road. The County would be improving Arrington even if Margraves Ranch did not access it
and the County needs to acquire the ROW either way. I would like to point out that I'm also disappointed that the
County Engineer has changed the plan he presented at the March 2017 BCSMPO Public Meeting about making
Arrington Road 3 -lanes with the middle as a turn lane. This seems to be a plan change with no citizens input that
people were counting on to help Nantucket residents that live on Arrington Road turn safely into their driveways.
After working for most of 2016 to get Mesa Verde extended to Hwy 6 so Nantucket would be relieved of the cut-
thru traffic and reduce our pedestrian and roadway safety Issues, I'm finding this direction extremely disappointing
and negligent.
As for the points the County Engineer brings up, comparing FM 2154 to Arrington Road (which was done in his
application to the City) makes no sense. One 3 -way intersection he references (Barron Cutoff Road to align with
Capstone Road) is approximately 360 feet separation. On the City's Thoroughfare Map, FM 2154 is designated
as a 4 -lane Major Arterial and Arrington Road is designated a 2 -Lane Major Collector. How does that make
sense to compare moving a 3 -way intersection on Arrington 1500 feet, a Major Collector (2 -lanes) vs. FM 2154
360 feet, a Major Arterial (4 -lanes)? You can fit approximately 100 cars within 1500 feet. Why would the Country
choose removing one 3 -way intersection on Arrington Road to pushing a sizeable increase in traffic past to the
street (Harpers Ferry) which is the only way to access our neighborhood park and past eight other 3 -way
intersections within Nantucket and 20 driveways?
Relative to the future ability of "traffic calming" on Arrington Road, a 3 -way stop would also do that. Not surehow
the volume at a 3 -way intersection would be so different not to warrant a stop. If the County has a checklist for
how this analysis is done, I'd love to see it.
It's also great that the County Engineer promises to do traffic counts for our neighborhood and to work to mitigate
issues, however, our safety issues is not just counting vehicles. It seems tome that the safety of vehicles from
Castlegate and Margraves Ranch and whether they will be impacted by congestion Is more important than the
safety of pedestrians that use our neighborhood streets. Doing traffic counts will not solve the problems and then
the options will be very limited. Margraves Ranch minor collector will be up to the City specifications for minor
collectors with sidewalks, bike lanes and no driveways entering, etc. Both the City and County seem to want to
make Harpers Ferry and Nantucket Drive into something it was not designed to be since we have no sidewalks,
no shoulders, no bike lanes, and all our driveways enter directly to these streets and you must traverse Harpers
Ferry to get to the neighborhood park.
Since not all the alternatives have been considered or studied and our neighborhood residents' safety was not
considered or addressed, I'm asking the County to withdraw the application from the City to realign Margraves
Ranch collector to Harpers Ferry.
Sincerely,
Vol. Pg" 5�
t
Marie E. Wolfe
4576 Sandpiper Cove
College Station, TX 77845
979-690-7075
PS: I'm attaching the application and study for those who haven't seen it.
From: Robert A. Munger <RAMunger@brazoscountytx.gov>
To: Marie Wolfe <me_wolfe@yahoo.com>; Steve HW. Aldrich
<SAldrich@brazoscountytx.gov>; Duane Peters <DPeters@brazoscountytx.gov>
Cc: Susan Hardin <shardinTX@gmail.com>; Mary Lou Price <mprice212@yahoo.com>;
Karen Weir <Motherweir@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 3:20 PM
Subject: RE: CPA2017-000012 - Realignment of Margrave's Ranch Minor Collector to
Harpers Ferry Road
Marie:
I'm sorry that you weren't at the meeting on Monday when this was discussed at length.
The need to reconstruct Arrington is well-established. Arrington preliminary engineering is the
impetus for the realignment. The need for the County to move in a timely manner for ROW
acquisition for Arrington improvements requires us to "nail down" how Arrington will operate.
Arrington has the similarities to FM 2154 (which you referenced). Offset intersections along
Arrington will serve to the detriment of future operations along Arrington.
Offset Intersections along FM 2154 which are currently being realigned (or under consideration) at
considerable expense are:
• Greens Prairie Trail (with elimination of Straub Road offset)
• Royder Road to align with Koppe Bridge Road
• Barron Cutoff Road to align with Capstone Road
The City of College Station has many other examples of offset intersections which currently add to
congestion on their primary roadways.
The aligned intersection as proposed will allow traffic to "cross Arrington" without traveling "along
Arrington'. The aligned intersection will provide the ability in the future to "calm" traffic along
Arrington with a future 4 -way stop whenever Margraves Tract ties in their collector. A stop sign
would be difficult (impossible) to ever "warrant" under the existing offset alignment.
Mesa Verde extension is being provided for growth south of Nantucket and to relieve volumes on
Arrington so that they may get to the main artery of our local network (SH 6) more easily. Harpers
Ferry will benefit from the reduced volumes on Arrington for an undetermined length of time. We do
not know at what rate that the reduced traffic volumes will be replaced by additional growth along the
Arrington corridor.
The County has a baseline of traffic volume/counts on Nantucket Drive/Harpers Ferry Drive and
South Oaks from 2016 and 2017. The County will collect that information after Mesa Verde is
opened and we will continue to collect volume/speed data on an ongoing basis. The County will
work to mitigate speeds with unidentified calming measures in the future as the data leads us.
Vol. __ 7 — Pg. J�
The primary transportation system (SH 6 exit ramp locations, SH 40, Fitch to the east, Greens
Prairie, Arrington) needs to operate much better so that the secondary system is not so heavily
utilized by motorists seeking to avoid areas of congestion.
If you have any further questions, you may call me.
Thanks,
R. Alan Munger, PE
County Engineer
Brazos County Road & Bridge
2617 Highway 21 West
Bryan, TX 77803
Phone: 979-822-2127 x 3026
From: Marie Wolfe [mailto:me_wolfe@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 2:06 PM
To: RobertA. Munger; Steve HW. Aldrich; Duane Peters
Cc: Susan Hardin; Mary Lou Price; Karen Weir
Subject: Fwd: CPA2017-000012 - Realignment of Margrave's Ranch Minor Collector to Harpers Ferry Road
Dear Judge Peters, Commissioner Aldrich & County Engineer Alan Munger,
I'm extremely surprised by the turn of events and the position of the County setting our
neighborhood (Nantucket) up for more cut thru traffic by your submission to the City to
change the Thoroughfare Plan.
Based on this, I can only assume that you are the people who should be held accountable
when something tragic happens because of the additional volume of vehicles traveling on
our neighborhood street past our neighborhood park.
You found the cut thru traffic volume from Indian Lakes in Nantucket important enough to
warrant extending Mesa Verde to Hwy 6, but now it looks like you want to help Castlegate
and Margraves Ranch use parts of Nantucket neighborhood streets as a FM 2154 type
road.
Sincerely,
Marie Wolfe
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jason Schubert <jschubertCcilcstx.gov>
Date: September 18, 2017 at 6:09:11 PM CDT
Vnl. �22,JPg. J-7
To: 'Marie Wolfe' <me wolfena.vahoo.com>
Cc: Lance Simms <Isimms((Dcstx.gov>, "Robert A. Munger"
<ramunger(a)brazoscountytx.gov>, "Steve HW. Aldrich"
<saldrich(a)_brazoscountytx.gov>, Susan Hardin <shardintxa-gmail.com>, "Mary
Lou Price" <mprice212(cDyahoo.com>, Karen Weir <motherweirCaD_hotmail.com>,
Karen Pitts <kap.texas(rDgmail. com>, Ward Wells
<ward diane wells(cDme.com>, Blanche Brick <bbrick0,cstx.gov>, Linda Harvell
<Iharvell(a)cstx.gov>, Hunter Goodwin <hunter.goodwin(a2oldhamgoodwin.com>
Subject: RE: CPA2017-000012 - Realignment of Margrave's Ranch Minor
Collector to Harpers Ferry Road
Marie,
As you may have heard, there was discussion of most of these items at a meeting that
was held this morning. Many of those copied on the email were in attendance and would
have the similar information to share. I've provided responses to your questions in your
email below as provided in [red bracketed text].
Regards,
Jason
Jason Schubert, AICP
Transportation Planning Coordinator
Planning & Development Services
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9960, College Station, Texas 77842
Physical Address: 1101 Texas Avenue
Office 979-764-62211 Fax 979-764-3496
Cav cm: C(1L..o:STA-n VS
fAw. )lam Adt(lkfmiLj'
From: Marie Wolfe [mailto:me wolfeCawahoo.coml
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 2:46 PM
To: Jason Schubert <lschubertna.cstx.gov>
Cc: Lance Simms <ls1mms0cstx.gov>; Robert A. Munger
<ramungeranbrazoscountytx.gov>; Steve HW. Aldrich<saldrichCcilbrazoscountytx.aov>;
Susan Hardin <shardintx(a�gmail.com>; Mary Lou Price <mpdce212avahoo.com>;
Karen Weir <motherweirahotmail.com>; Karen Pitts <kap.texas@gmaii.com>; Ward
Wells <ward diane_wells@me.com>; Blanche Brick <bbrick@cstx.gov>; Linda Harvell
<Iharvell a()cstx.gov>; Hunter Goodwin <hunter.goodwinCaDoldhamgoodwin.com>
Subject: CPA2017-000012 - Realignment of Margrave's Ranch Minor Collector to
Harpers Ferry Road
***** This is an email from an EXTERNAL source. DO NOT click links or open
attachments without positive sender verification of purpose. Never enter
USERNAME, PASSWORD or sensitive information on linked pages from this
email. *****
Vol. Pg. s�
Dear Jason,
I noticed in this morning's Eagle that this is a Public Notice to amend the
Thoroughfare Plan to realign a future Minor Collector roadway planned to
intersect Arrington Road from the west between South Oaks Drive and Harpers
Ferry Road to align with Harpers Ferry Road.
Need a few questions answered:
1. Who initiated this amendment and what was the reasoning?
City Staff, County, Developer or ?
[Response: The thoroughfare plan amendment application to realign
the future minor collector to Harpers Ferry Road was initiated by
Brazos County. My understanding is that the need to consider aligning
the roadways was identified during the design process for the
Arrington Road reconstruction and is anticipated to result in
transportation safety and efficiency improvements along the corridor.
Several examples of offset intersections around the community were
cited during this morning's meeting along with the issues that relate to
them.]
2. What process was used to get it to the P&Z? Did it have to through
the Transportation & Mobility Committee or any other City committee?
[Response: The process to go to P&Z is the same as other Comprehensive Plan
amendment applications submitted by those external to the City. The application
is submitted for staff review in preparation for public hearings and consideration
by the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. Planning efforts and
projects initiated by the City that relate to traffic/transportation are taken to the
Transportation & Mobility (sub)Committee of the Council on an as needed basis
for feedback and direction.]
3. What types of analysis were done to warranty this request? TIA, etc.
[Response: My understanding is that Brazos County contracted with Mitchell &
Morgan Engineers to process the request and Kimley-Horn was contracted to
perform an analysis of the change using the travel demand model. A copy of
Kimley-Horn's study that was submitted with the application was handed out by
Mitchell & Morgan at this morning's meeting.]
4. How, when and who in the Nantucket HOA was contacted about this
pending realignment?
[Response: As part of the meeting scheduled by Oldham Goodwin Group,
representatives of Nantucket HOA were invited to this morning's meeting where
the proposed amendment was introduced and discussed. A courtesy letter is
being mailed to the HOA and property owners surrounding the realignment area
to notify of them of the request and the upcoming public hearings.]
5. Who in the County has approved this change or is required to approve
this change?
[Response: I am not aware of the discussion that took place internally at Brazos
County to authorize the request so would defer to them. In addition to being
signed by Mitchell & Morgan, Brazos County's representative, the application
was signed by Alan Munger, County Engineer.]
.Pg...,
J
6. How can the City decide to change this alignment and increase our
neighborhood safety issues, when they won't work with our neighborhood
on solutions that would lessen our roadway safety issues?
[Response: The request was initiated by Brazos County stemming from their
planned roadway improvements for Arrington Road. The question at hand relates
to whether the two roadways should align or be offset along Arrington Road.
There was a large amount of discussion at the meeting regarding the concerns
that you have expressed and a commitment by Brazos County to monitor the
roadways as changes to the transportation system occur in the area and respond
as appropriate to the circumstances. College Station expressed willingness to
provide technical support as needed to Brazos County as needed. The study
concludes that aligning the roadways has a minor effect on anticipated traffic
volumes on Harpers Ferry Road. The concerns you express likely exist with or
without the roadways aligning though aligning the two reduces issues related to
the potential offset being created on Arrington Road and assists the County's
efforts to reconstruct Arrington Road.]
7. How do I go about getting all the pertinent correspondence, analysis,
reports, etc. that are associated with this request?
[Response: All information that has been submitted is available through the City
via an open records request. Copies of the application and related study were
handed out by the applicant at today's meeting so should also be available from
others that attended as well.]
Thanks for your cooperation in responding quickly since the goes before the P&Z
on October 5m
Cheers,
Marie Wolfe
4576 Sandpiper Cove
College Station, TX 77845
979-690-7075
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University
Attachments
• image001.jpg (3.10KB)
• Harpers Ferry Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application.pdf (1.11MB)
• Harpers Ferry TDM,pdf (1.54MB)
LO
Vol. ry,
CITY QF-COULBGESTATION
Herm e7h*AdM-UWpm11Y-
FOAOF010 tMIONLY
CASE NO
DATE SUBMITTED.
TIME:
STAFF:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ARPLICATIGN
(Check all applicable)
D Related to COMMUnIty, Character Related to Transportation D:Related to Other
,MINJMUM'SUBMITTA4 RrmurREmENT.s:
$1,240 Comprehensive Plan AmendmentAppilcallon Fee.
N Application completed In NIL This application form provided by the City Of College St6tion-inust be,uped
and may not be Wf6sted mattered. Please altithpages if:erdOitibngl'lnf6tmiitionlbprovided,
xO Fully dimensioned map on 24"X'136" paper shoWlng,(If applicable):
a. Land affected:
b. Present zoning of property ohd.zpr)lng classification ofgl6abultlyg property;
c. Current Concept;Map end Future Land Liseand Character Map
plaW00alloris and proposed
classifications;
d. Current Concept Map and Future Land,Uss and Character. Map.classJoc9tions,of all abutting property;
e. Current and proposed thoroughfare alignments;
f. Currently planned Utility Infrastructure and proposed utility Infrastructure:
g. General locationand property; and
h. Total acres of property.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference ,Mot Applicable..
NAME.OFPROJ.ECT Arittigtoi)-RpaCld.ff$lg#r$F.ar.tyAllgoMont
ADDRESS ArdngtonRoad'atHarpers-Ferry
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) A01010, Wflam C1.6fir Tract,l, 388-57,AcrosA A00760.1 A Bablite
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED:
iGetyeraW the.Intersection olArrington Road and Harpers Fen..y
TOTAL ACREAGE NIA
APPLICANT/ PROJECT MANAGERS INFORM r IN
INFORMATION (Primary contact for the projec,
Name Mitchelf& Morgan, LLP CIO Veronfoa Morgan, PE -E -mall v@mttahellandmotgan.com
Street Address 0204 Earl Rudder Fre6i#ey South
City College Station State Texas ZIpQqdq! 77W
Phone Number 879.280 BQ63 Fox Number 979-280-,3564
aWrjCp�*
)W*See
6H5 Page I of3
Vol. pg.
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name POO CNO A LLC —E -mall hunter.goodwln,@oldhamgoodwin.com
Street Address 2800 S. Texas AWnk Sake 401
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77601'
Phone Number 979-268.201)0
Fax Number 979-&48.7.020
ANSWER ALL OF THE FOLLOWNG:
1. What specific element of the. Comprehensive Plan (for example; Land. Use!and Character designation, Thoroughfare
Plan Context Class, of thoroughfare alignment) and at what specific location (if applicable) Is requested'to be
amended?
Thoroughfare alignment of the proposed 2 -lane, minor oolleotorthat Is currently shown to connect the future extension of
Castlegate Drive to Arrington Road between South Oats Drive and Harpers Ferry Drive.
2. What Is the amendment request?
The Amendment Request Is to realign future 24ane minor collector so that It-allgns with existing Harpers.Ferry. This will'.
create a future 4°way Intersection,
3. Explain the reason for this amendment,
Thoroughfare Plan
or signalized Interm
P number of oonfllot,
Ferry creating
a 4 way stop %
at a 3-waylnterseotion.
on-Arfington: Road and i
warrant -for stop
tons create a
4. Identify the conditions that have changed to warrant this change to the "Isting Comprehensive Plan,
creasing number of developments wlthin'Clty of College Station needing to'take access from Arrington Road along.
th deteriorating pavement conditions to the existing pavement ofAmingtcn Road is driving the need for Brazos County
rehabilitate and reconstruct Arrington Road. Amending the Thoioughfere.Plan:as proposed will allow Brazos County
move forward .with ROW acquisition process ofpropeities within the City of°CS whlchis.required prior to final deslgn
id construction of roadway improvements.
6. Explain why the existing elementof the Comprehensive Plan in question is no longer appropriate.
2016, Brazos County and 'City of College Station collaborated with TxDOT on the. FM. 2154 corridor to. eliminate
i1hple 3 -way intersections and createe single 4 way Intersection. The,feedback from CSISD androadwayusers has
en supportive of the safety Improvements which have been newly prodlded with'the oreatjon.ofahe 4 way intersection
least 3 other projects along the FM 2164:oorridor are.being planned to..ellminate multiple 3 way i4teraeoi6na.and
alize the operational Improvements of creating a 4.Way Intersection whkh (n fum;lnhpjoves safety ofthe traveling
6. How does the
goals end:oblectivesof the
The stated goal within the Transportation element of the Comprehensive Plamis: 'Improved mobility through a safe,
efficient and welkconnected multl-modal tranaportallon.system designed to -be sensitive to. surrounding land uses".
Further quoting from (Report 0-4365=P2 .VAC 1; Fitzpatrick, Wooldridge, Blaschke): "The math objectives of Intersection
design are to laoilitate the safe and eBklent movements of motor vefikles buses, .trucks, bicycles, and padestdans.
Intersection design should be fitted closely to the,operating characteristics of users." The goals: and objectives of the
ComorehenslveAsn are bekho.furfhered:by eliminating multiple offset 3 way-Intersecflons and creating; a: single 4.way
6116
vol. X31 Pg. �,
Page:2.of 3
7. What other Information are you providing to support the proposed amendment (for example, transportation Impact
study)?
A TIA letteris attached.
The applicant has prepared .this appllcation and certifies that the facts stated ,herelh and exhibits attached ;hereto
are Ime, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION Is FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there Is
more than one owner, all owners must sign theapplication or the power of attorney. If the owner Is a company, the
appll"on must be accompanied by proof of authority for the oompahy's representative to sign the
application on Its behalf
and
k
Date
5116-PrIntForm - Page.3 of 3
ADDITIONAL APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name:
Brazos County C/0 Alan.Munger, PE
Email:
ramunger@brazoscountytx..gov
Street Address:
2617 State Highway 21 West
City:
Bryan
State:
Texas
Zlp Code:
77803
Phone Number:
979-822-2127
Fa x. N um b e r:
979-775-0453
[Vol. Pg.
7. What other Information are you providing to support the proposed amendment (for example, transportation impact
study)?
A TIA letter Is attached.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that Ilia facts stated herein and exhibits :attached ,hereto
are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPCIGATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER 'THAN 'THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from ,the owner. It there Is
more than one owner, all oivners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If (lie owner Is a. company, the
application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the
application on Its behalf.
Signature and 11111 Date
tpv/,/ilI �irlCrir✓E�
5/15 Frtnt-Form page's ora
Vol. y pg. GS
ADDITIONAL APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: Brazos CountyG/OAlan Munger,PE
Email: ramunger@brazoscountyo.gov
Street Address: 2617 State Highway 21 West
City:
Bryan
State:
Texas
Zip Code:
77803
Phone Number:
979-822.2127
Fax Number:
979-775-0453
/Y— t^ 7 c
Signature
9--N-
Date
FV(W. � pg. 7
KimlepMorn
September 7, 2017
To: Veronica Morgan, PE
Mitchell and Morgan
From: Jeff Whitacre, P.E., AICP, PTP
Jonelle Hanson, AICP
�. � '•.tislff
JEFFREY WHITA.GRE
69
SSS.
\\
T. E •� 0 t7
RE: Future minor collector realignment to Harpers Ferry Road
Overview
Page 1
The purpose of this study Is to evaluate the realignment of a future minor collector and theimpacts
the realignment will have on the planned College Station Thoroughfare Plan. The minor collector
under evaluation Is currently planned to intersect Arrington Road approximately 1,500 feet north of
Harpers Ferry Road but is under considerationlo:be realigned to Intersect directly with Harpers Ferry
Road. This study looks at the Impacts of this realignment on the planned thoroughfare network in the
area bounded by the following: Arington Road, Greens Prairie Road, Nantucket.Drive, Harpers Ferry
Road, and South Oaks.
Study Approach
This study utilizes a travel demand model (TDM) to estimate traffic projections within the study area
limits. A travel demand Is a tool that cities use to develop munlcipal_transportation plans. The model
utilizes demographic data to generate forecasted trip volumes. These trip volumes are distributed
among the roadway network via a gravity -model based on desirable origins and destinations.
This TDM study is Independent of the April 2017 Traffic ImpactAhalysis (TIA) thatwas prepared for
the Margraves tract. A TIA evaluates traffic impacts and mitigation strategies for a developmefifor
project. A TIA.Is a micro -analysis( focused on identify Improvements while a TDM is a tool utilized to
understand how thoroughfare changes Impact the overall network.
Volume projections may vary from various methodologies and TDM runs, however the findings are
anticipated to remain consistent.
Traffic projections were developed forthe study area with the following two (2) options:
e Existing TDP Model: Future minor collector connecting to Arrington Road, approximately
1,500 feet north of Harpers Ferry Road
• Realignment Road Scenario: Future minor collector aligned to Harpers Ferry Road
i�6un_`e� hoot cgjn�i f 801i0hC+iytSlreep�hlriilx860' Fafl Wo�lh TF. 78,162` _ .�
Vol. psi Pg. _Z
Ki➢E1le >) or 1 Paget
Modeling Methodology — RoadwayNetwork.and Demographic Adjustments
As part of the 2015.College Station Thoroughfare Development: Plan, Kimley-Horn developed a
Travel Demand Model (TDM) for College Stalioh. Using this TDM, the roadway rietwork.and
demographics can be adjusted. within the planned. development.Study,Area. Forthis study,
adjustments to the model.only occurred within the -study area.. The roadway network was modified,
removing facilities that are not anticipated to be built in a foreseeable. future. This included the
removal of two collectors conneotingt'o Arrington and the extension of WS Phillips Parkway
connecting to Mesa Verde. The roadway facilities Were removed from the. travel demand .model for
the purposes of analysis only. With these removals, the traffic,volumes were insolated to the future
minor collector that was being evaluated. These additional roadways will further redistribute traffic In
the future and are not being recommended to be removed from the'ThorouOhfare Plan.
One of the primary inputs.into the
TDM is demographlec which
Includes households and
employment.data. In the TDM,.
each Traffic Analysis'. Zone (TAZ.
has:the demographics needed to
determine how many trips are
generated and where the trips
are.going. As part of the previous
Thoroughfare Plan the TAZs in
this area were developed with
projected households- and
employment using the Future
Land Use Plan. However, for this
study recently approved zoning
case information gathered from various Traffic Impact Analysis were utilize
to refine the TAZ. containing the Mergraves tract, two apartment • complexes
and recent commercial development. See Exhlbitl for TAZ boundaries.
Exhibit 1— TAZ bounderles
Once the appropriate adjustments are completed, the Four -Step ModelingProcess,(trip generation,
trip distribution, modal split, and1rip assignment) can be completed in TransCAD: This':macio;model
is an excellent tool to compare existing and future traffic volunriwon roadways at regional or sub -
regional level.
[Igh$YFho'rnrcom4 . 801 Cherry Street, Unit 959, Fort Worth, TX 7.6102
Vol.77 1
ft,
Kidey»>Horrn
Model Results
Page 3
Travel demand model results are commonly presented in volume ranges that -correspond closely to
the function classification (i.e. collector or arterial) and the anticipated number of travel lanes. The
model results between two scenarios are compared do determineIf; the proposed: modification has
Impacted the Thoroughfare. Plan. Below are the volume ranges tieing utilized for comparison in this
study:
0 0=1000 vehicles per day: Local Street
0 0=5,000 vehiclesperday: Minor Collector with two lanes
0 5,000-10,000 vehicles per day: Minor Collectorwith turn lanes or Major Collector
0 10,000 —15;000 vehicles per day: Major Collector
0 15,000-25;000 vehicles per day: Minor Arterial
The travel demand model ruri resUltsare provided in-the.attached Exhiti11192 and 4. TWO
summarizes the traffic,projections for each corridor of interest for the realignment scenarloand
Thoroughfare Plan network.
Existing TDP Scenarlo Findings:
• Projected volumes -on the future minor collector between Greens Prairle;Road and Arrington
Road are appropriate for a minor collector (2,300-7,000 vehicles per day) with intersection
improvements at Greens Prairie Road.
e Projected Volumes on Harpers Ferry Road are forecasted to 1,900 vehicles per day
Realignment Scenario Findings:
• Projected volumes on the future minor collector are slightly:lower-on theoogment near
Greens Prairie and slightly higher on the segment near Arrington Road. The realignment
provides a increased dispersion of traffic between Greens Prairie Road and Arrington Road.
• Trips are sufficiently diatrlbuted onto area collectors/arterlal&wlth a minor Increase in
projected volume on Harpers Ferry Road and Arrington Road.
• The realignment of -the futureminor collector to Harpers: Ferry Road Is not anticipated Impact
the Level of Service.
• A realignment of the future minor collector to Harpers Ferry. Road is not anticipated to have
significant Impact to the projected .volumes along the thoroughfares in the studyarea.
801 Cherry Street, Unit 950, Fort W.' orlh, TX 76102
EV(A.0_ Pg.
Kimlep> orn
Page 4
Select Link:Analysis
A select.link analysis was run on Castlegate Drive. to understand the trip patterns of users on the
selected roadway link with the primary purpose•to understand the amount of traffic that will travel from
Castiegate Drive to Harpers.Fefry Road. Exhtblt.2 shows this to 6e 1..9% (100 vehicles per day)
under the current Thoroughfare Plan and 3.2% (170 vehicles per day) with•the realignment..
+qI.C�1J,ejrlt[o7ftom 861 Cherry Street, Unit 960, Fort Worth, TX 76102
Vol, —_ pg,
Current Thoroughfare
Plan
Realignment Scenario
&hIbit 2 - Select Link Analysis
K9dep)Horn Page
Preliminary Recommendation
Realignment Scenario Evaluation
The results of the travel demand model analysis demonstrate that there is -little or no impact to
surrounding -thoroughfares if the future minor -collector is realigned to Harpers Ferry'Road. Theduture
minor collector serves' primarily as,:a.collector for the residential neighborhood, and access is
provided by Greens Prairie Road,and Arrington Road. An alignment of he future minor collector to
Harpers Ferry Road, improves overall Intersection -safety by not affowfng overlapping, left turns. In
addition, aligning the future minor collector will prevent future dlfficultles.the'offset intersectlohs.can
create and also allows for the;potential that the intersection of Arrington Road andMarper Ferry could
be stopped controlled, if warranted. Therefore, it Is recommended that this section could Op realigned
in the thoroughfare plan.
IftN-15ry,-"liornkothi 801 Cherry Street, Unit 950, Fort Worth, TX 78102
vol. /�� pg. -1 �_
K"hiley-0 Horn
Page 6
Rhlbit3 — Current ThOrOWMare Pfaj
Vol. Pg.
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . ...
. .....
College Stat
Mobillty Analysls
Thorougfore Plan
pl.
Realignment Evaluation
Legend
_Roadways
.......
— .New Conn*c:ff9n
1,000 DW Volumes
Klmley*Horn
XX
,
Rhlbit3 — Current ThOrOWMare Pfaj
Vol. Pg.
Kimle ))Horn
Page 7
801 Cherry Street, Unit 950, FortWorth, TX 76402
Vol. s? Pg. 1-2
Exhibit 4 Proposed Reeli9 ment
I
v"
4
}
t
G
gage
'..
o
soupdR+s
�
�
k
College Station
_
MobilityAnolyais
$ •.•
Anington Rd'ConneCKon
F
Realignment Evaluatlon
Q.
legend
— Roadways
'
—'New Conneallon
-
1.000 Dally vowmes
y.
o as w A
Kiml
.Horn
801 Cherry Street, Unit 950, FortWorth, TX 76402
Vol. s? Pg. 1-2
Exhibit 4 Proposed Reeli9 ment
Kimley»>Horn
Page 8
Table 1. Study Area Daily Volume Summary
Current
Reallgnment
STREET
Urfilts
Thoroughfare Plan
Scenario
Greens Prairie Road
Ardngton Road
Castlegate Drive
19;600:
1-9000
Arrington Road
Greens Prairie Road
South Oaks
7,200
101600
Arrington Road
South Oaks
Futuro Minor Collector
6,200
NA
Arrington Road
Future, Minor Collector
Harpers Ferry Road
4;700-
NA
Arrington Road
South Oaks
Harpers Ferry Road
1+1A
7;400
Harpers Ferry Rood
"Arrington Road
Nantucket Drive
1,900
2,200
Castlegate Drive
Victoria Ave
Greens,Rraide Road
5,300
5300.
Future. Minor-' Collector
Greens Prairie Road
East Segmenl
71000
6;300
Futuro.Miner Collector
West Segment
Arrington Road.
2,300.
3;300
South Oaks
Arrin ton Road
W6
1,400
3400
801 Cherry Street, Unit 960,'FoA Worth, TX 76102
Numbers from the Report done by Kimley Horn (Jeff Whitacre) dated 9/7/2017
offset aligned difference
7200
10600
3400
19600
19000
-600
5300
5300
0
7000
6300
-700
2300
3300
1000
6200
7400
1200
1400
3600
2200
4700
3600
-1100
1900
2200
300
55600 61300 5700
5700
vcw, . ? f f Pg.
Subject: Realignment of Harper's Ferry
From: Mary Lou Price (mprice212@yahoo.com)
To: mpdce212@yahoo.com;
--------..-_..----
Date: Tuesday, Tuesday, September 26, 2017 3:33 AM
Mary Lou Price
4587 Cricket Pass
College Station, Texas 77845
I am here today to also request the County withdraw its application to the City
of College Station to realign Margraves Ranch Minor Collector on Arrington Road
to Harper's Ferry Road.
In addition to the comments made by Mrs. Wolfe, I would like to point to some
other information we have gathered since finding out a week ago about this
realignment. On September 18, Mrs. Wolfe emailed Mr.Jason Shubert with the
City of College Station with questions regarding the public notice she read in the
Eagle about the realignment. Two of the people she copied in the email were Mr.
Aldrich and Mr. Munger. It is my understanding they were at the meeting that
morning with our HOA president, Mr. Ward Wells, and Mrs. Karen Pitts, also from
our neighborhood. Mr. Shubert replied to Mrs. Wolfe that evening, and everyone
who was copied in the original email was copied in his reply. Multiple times he
stated this request was initiated by Brazos County. He also stated it was his
understanding that Brazos County contracted with Mitchell & Morgan to process
the request, and with Kimley-Horn to perform an analysis of the change using
the travel demand model. I have searched through the minutes of your
Commissioners Court meetings since the Margraves Development project was
approved in late May by the City of College Station. I have been unable to locate
any approval of contracts for this project with either Mitchell & Morgan or
Kimley-Horn. I even searched the two months prior to the approval. I did find
one contract with Mitchell & Morgan that was approved during the June 27
meeting, but that was for engineering and surveying services for the Brazos
County Records Storage Facility Project.
I'm baffled as to why these contracts wouldn't have been approved through the
normal agenda process. In reading the minutes, it seems that all manners of
contracts are voted on, regardless of dollar amount. Since neither Mr. Aldrich
nor Mr. Munger replied to Mr. Shubert's email disagreeing with his responses, I
assume the County did initiate the request. If so, where are the contracts with
Mitchell & Morgan, and with Kimley-Horn? Why did Veronica Morgan with
Mitchell & Morgan complete and sign the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Application for the City of College Station on August 17, 2017, but the analysis
of the proposed change from Kimley-Horn wasn't completed until September 7,
Vol. Pg.
_i
2017? Mr. Munger didn't sign the application until September 11, 2017. I also
see nothing in the minutes that discussed submitting the application to the City
of College Station to request the change to their Comprehensive Plan.
Something just doesn't add up.
Our group of concerned Nantucket residents has been diligently working through
the appropriate local government processes for almost 2 years to voice our
complaints about how the future developments will negatively affect the safety
of the residents of our neighborhood. We have pleaded with both elected
officials and staffs of the county and the city to let us have a voice in the
discussions. Instead, no one will even give us the courtesy of acknowledging we
will be negatively impacted, and we certainly haven't been given a voice at the
table ... merely a meeting to tell us what everyone else decided and what has
already been acted upon.
At one of the meetings I attended, I asked one of the City engineers what the
City would do to help mitigate the negative impact on our neighborhood from all
the traffic generated by the developments and apartments they were
approving. He looked at me, with a smile, and told me that wasn't their
problem. Is the County going to budget more money for road repairs, because
as often as you're having to spend money on repairs to our roads now, that
won't be anything compared to what it will be once all the additional traffic is
added. Also, who's problem will it be when a pedestrian or a cyclist gets
seriously injured or killed on our narrow rural neighborhood roads? You know as
well as I do that our roads were never intended to be collectors. Regardless of
how the city identified them on their thoroughfare plan, they are in no way
comparable to minor collectors in the surrounding subdivisions. Unlike
Castlegate, Pebble Creek or the new developments planned for Margraves and
Southern Point, we don't have wide collector streets with curbs and gutters,
sidewalks and street lights. They also have driveways on interior streets.
Instead, we have many driveways on all of these very narrow streets, and we
have ditches, no sidewalks and no street lights.
Nantucket Dr. and Harper's Ferry will also not be the only streets that will see
additional traffic. Misty Lane, Sandpiper and Barnstable Harbor will be the
shortcut through our neighborhood to get to Harper's Ferry and then Arrington
for many people coming from Highway 6 in College Station to the Margraves
Development. Taking the Nantucket Dr. exit will allow them to bypass all the
traffic at the W. D. Fitch exit and at Arrington intersections at both Fitch and
Greens Prairie. No one at the City or County will address this, either. Those
roads are used heavily by walkers in our neighborhood. They are worse than
Harper's Ferry and Nantucket because there are deep ditches in some places and
there are multiple curves in the road.
Nantucket was designed to be a rural neighborhood. I totally understand the
need for growth and development, but it needs to be planned in harmony with
Vol. Pg. 7'7
existing neighborhoods. Just because it looks pretty, and cheap and logical on a
map to route future traffic through our neighborhood, doesn't mean it's the only
option. To my knowledge, no one will even look at other options. Our residents
purchased homes in Nantucket for a certain lifestyle. We like the quiet rural
setting that doesn't have many bells and whistles. Other people buy in
subdivisions that offer community pools, playgrounds, tennis courts, walking
paths; etc. because that appeals to their lifestyles. I think it's great that newer
developments offer so much, but why do all the power players in this deal think
we should just give up our lifestyle, our neighborhood integrity and, most of all,
our safety just because no one is willing to compromise on traffic flow.
Saying you'll continue to monitor the conditions and respond as appropriate does
not give me comfort. Sadly, I've just been left with a lack of trust and a whole
lot of disgust in a lot of elected officials and staff.
Vol. �L Pg.. C
Resolution
naming
THE BRAZOS COUNTY BUILDING
at
300 E. WILLIAM JOEL BRYAN PARKWAY
in honor of
RUTH MCLOED
WHEREAS, Ruth McLeod has worked for Brazos County since June 1966; and
WHEREAS, To date, Ruth McLeod has worked in numerous offices in many different
capacities; and
WHEREAS, Ruth McLeod has proven to be a dedicated and integral employee always
performing the highest caliber of work; and
WHEREAS, Brazos County recognizes and thanks Ruth McLeod for over 50 years of
service to Brazos County; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOVED that the Commissioner's Court of Brazos County
hereby designates the Brazos County building at 300 E. William Joel Bryan Parkway to be
known now and hereafter as the Ruth McLeod Building.
D Y adopted by vote of the Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas on the
(04'day of JPp�i , 2017
Duane Peters
County Judge
Commissioner Steve Aldrich c6mmissi9der Sammy Catalena
Precinct 1 Precinct 2� ,
Commi onerNancy Berry 0 Commissio
Precinct 3 Precinct 4
17-021
voc .2-5-% Pg. ZZ
3
sTullmEtion
'Whereas- the National Association of Town Watch is sponsoring a unique, nationwide trine, drug, and
violence prevention program on Tuesday, October 3, 2017, entitled "National Night Out"; and
Whereas, the "30 annual Naaonal Nighl Out" provides a unique opportunity for Brazos County, the cities
of Bryan, College Station, Texas A&M University, Wixon Valley, and Konen to join forces with
thousands of other communities across the country in promoting cooperative police community
crime prevention efforts; and
"Whereas, the law enforcement agencies of Brazos County, the cities of Bryan, College Station, Texas
A&M University, Wixon Valley and Kurtea have joined together in the crime prevention efforts
and are supporting "NationafAighl Out 20171' locally; and
Whereas, it is essential that all citizens of Brazos County, the cities of Bryan, College Station Texas
A&M University, Wixom Valley and Kurten be aware of the importance of crime prevention
programs and the impact their participation can have on reducing crime, drugs, and violence in
Brazos County; and
Whereas: polio comm miry partnerships and neighborhood safety and awareness and cooperation are
important themes of the "National Nlght Out' program.
NOW, therefore: I, Duane Peters, County Judge of Brazos County, Andrew Nelson as Mayor of Bryan,
Karl Mooney as Mayor of College Station, and Michael K Young as President of Texas A&M University, and
James Soafje as Mayor of Wixon Valley, and Ronnie Huth! as Mayor of Kurten, do hereby call upon all citizens of
Brazos County, the cities of Bryan, College Station, Texas A&M University, Wixon Valley and Kurten to join thew
law enforcement officers and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting the "340 annual National
Night Out' on Tuesday, October 3, 2017.
Further, let it be resolved that I, Duane Peters, County Judge of Brazos County, Andrew Nelson as Mayor
of Bryan, Karl Mooney as Mayor of College Station, Michael K. Young as President of Texas A&M University
James Soe.#a as Mayor of Wixon Valley, and Ronnie !.lupi as Mayor of Kurten do hereby proclaim Tuesday,
October 3, 2017 as:
' at%na -VigFit Out"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
ri loon y, yo
CITY OF VALLEY
J a or
r
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
Michael K. Young, President
CITY OF KURTEN
once Vitu i, President
Vol. 2.i� pg,
i
Brazos County
Job Description
Last Updated:
On 1 P
Class Number: 2355 Title:
..............
Pay Group: 08 Department:
FLSA Status: Non Exempt Reports To:
Approved Date: 1 0101 /201 7 EEOC Category:
.
Position End Temporary.
Date: 09/30/2018 Employee
Signature:
General Summary:
Perfonns a variety of clerical and cashier duties for the Tax/Assessor Collector's Office.
Clerk, Temp -Tax Office
Tax Assessor/ Collector
Tax Assessor/ Collector
Office and Clerical
Ng
Template Recision 12 00,192012 I I
Essential Duties:
Other dudes maybe assigned. NOTE: All Tax Office Employees report to the Tax Assessor/Collector through the Chief Deputy. Please refer to Tax
Office Organizational Chan. Assists the public in person, by telephone, and by mail concerning department information, researching records, filing
out forms, and resolving relevant problems; Performs general clerical dudes as required. Including filing, scanning, indexing, recording information.
and making copies.
Property Tax Clerk
Receives and processes property tax payments in person, and through mail. Assists taxpayers with questions and general information on payment
of taxes, homestead eligibility, trustlpayment agreements and processes requests for tax certificates. Must assist with refund/overpayment
documentation. Assists with beer and liquor license renewals by verifying tax Information. Assists bookkeeping department with cash balancing
duties. Balances cash drawer with work on a daily basis. Assists supervisors with balancing and reporting duties for various taxing jurisdictions. Must
maintain a current knowledge or Texas Property Tax Code. _
Motor Vehicle Clerk
Processes vehicle registration applications, Including receiving payments and issuing sticker/receipts. Processes vehicle tide transfers. including
assisting customers with required documentation and examination of tide paperwork for accuracy and completion. Processes various permit
applications. Assists with processing beer and liquor license renewals, including receiving payments and issuing receipts. Assists bookkeeping
department with cash balancing dudes. Must maintain current knowledge of Texas Transportatlon Code as It affects registration and fide processes.
Other Duties as assigned. 0%)
Supervision
Received:
Given: This is a non-supervisoryposition.
Education
Experience
Required: High school graduation or its equivalent, plus at least six months of office experience, or any equivalent
combination of education and experience which provides the required knowledge. skills, and abilities,
Preferred:
Required: To perform this job successfully, and individual must be able to perform each essential duty satisfactorily. The
requirements listed beloware representative of the knowledge, skid, and/or ability required. Reasonable
accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
Preferred:
Certificates, Licenses,
Registrations
Required: None
Preferred:
Physical Demands
Typical:
The Physical demands described here are representative of those that must be mat by an employee to
successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable
individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. While performing the duties of this job, the
employee is regularly required to sit; use hands to finger, handle, or feel; reach with hands and arms: bend and
kneel; and talk and hear. The employee frequently Is required to stand and walk. The employee must
frequently lift andlor move objects weighing up to 20 pounds, such as books and stacks of records. Specific
vision abilities required by this job Include close vision, distance vision, and ability to adjust focus.
Knowledge, Skills, &
Abilities
Typical:
Standard office practices and procedures. Including handling cash and making change. Operate computers
and standard office equipment; read and understand manuals, Journals, policies and procedures, and office
memos; write forth letters, memos, and accurate telephone messages: perform basic mathematical
calculations, including making change; communicate effectively, both orally and in writing; and maintain
effective working relationships with co-workers and the general public.
Work k&ffonment
Typical:
The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an employee encounters
while performing the essential functions of thisjob. Reasonable accommodations maybe made to enable
individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. The noise level in the work environment is usually
moderate. The employee is constantly required to work dosely with others as a part of a team; to perform
tedious, exacting work. and to switch from one task to another. The employee is.frequently required to perform
multiple tasks simultaneously, and to work under time pressures to meet deadlines.
Z
VE
a�h7
Duane Peters Date
County Judge
Vol, . `� ' PO, �_
<F SEP 15 ZG17
Brazos County
•J e Job Description
r Last Updated: September 2017
mF
lc:: qoo I
Template aevlrlan 1,2 09115CO12
Class Number:
2668 — _
Title:
Tech Temporary (1040 hrs)—_..__..
Pay Group:
NIA
Department:
Road & Bridge
FLSA Status:
Non Exempt
Reports To:
General Superintendent
Approved Date:
10/01/17
EEOC Category:
Skilled Craft Workers
Position End
09/30/2018
Temporary
Employee
High school graduation or its equivalent; or any combination of equivalent education and experience that
reddes.thBlee�red knaWladae_SklltS.and2hillnna
Date:
Signature:
General Summa :
supervises seal coat work, crack seal and Trot mix work of subcontractors.
Essential Duties:
Other dudes maybe assigned. Drives county roods to assess and determine roads to be crack sealed or seal coaled; coordinates ectiv'lly with each
area supervisor, assists other county employees In completing a set of plans and specifications for the subject work.
Other Duties as assi nod. 1
p/c
Supervision
Received•
General supedntendant
Given:
ThIsTs a non -supervisory poshlon; however can direct sdbcon acicrs with Itwk u' a; Inspects contractor seal
..coat hot mix and crack seal appliaatrona.
Education
Required:
High school graduation or its equivalent; or any combination of equivalent education and experience that
reddes.thBlee�red knaWladae_SklltS.and2hillnna
Preferred:
Experience
Required:
_
At least fire years of experience. To perform this job successfully, an Individual rant be able to perform each
essential duty satisfactorily as noted above.
Preferred:
Cedf£ycates, Licenses,
Registrations
Required:
Nand/ claw c ortvere ucemse.
Preferred:
Ph_sloaI Demands
_
Typicalc
The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met Ey an employee to
successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations maybe made to enable
Individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. While performing the duties of this job, the
employee Is regularly required to stand; use hands to finger, handle, or feel; reach with hands and arms; and
talk and hear. The employee must frequently bend, sloop, squat and walk. The employee must frequently lift
and/or move objects weighing up to 30 pounds, such as tools and equipment. Specific vision abilities required
by this job Include close vision, distance vision, peripheral vision, and ability to adjust focus.
��
Knowledge, Skills, 8
Abilities
Typical-
Assess need for end condkion of drainage systems; design drainage systems; work effectively and
cooperativelywith co-workers. Assess need forcorective or preventative maintenance and recommend
proper comective measures for the assessed needs. Communicate effectively to General Superintendent and
County Engineer.
while performing the essential functions of this Job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable
Individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. The noise level In the work environment is
frequently loud. The employee Is constantly required to work closely with others as a part of a team, and is
frequently exposed to danger. The employee is occasionally required to perform tedious, exacting work, to
awitch from one task to another, and towork under time pressures to meet deadlines.
AppROVED
2'tt�l?
Date
Duane peters
County judge
Vol. e;2 p0,
Consultant Services Agreement
Between Brazos County, Texas
And MFE, LLC.
This Consultant Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into and effective on the
1st day of September, 2017, by and between the Brazos County, Texas, a local government,
("COUNTY"), and MFE, LLC., a Texas limited liability company, ("Consultant"), whereby
Consultant agrees to provide COUNTY with certain professional consulting services as
described herein and COUNTY agrees to pay the Consultant for those services.
1. Scope of Services
In consideration of the compensation stated in paragraph 2, the Consultant agrees to
provide COUNTY with the professional consulting services as described in the Statement of
Work, attached hereto as Attachment "A", incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, and
which services may be more generally described as follows:
Provide professional Real Estate/Business Development consulting and Project Management
services.
2. Payment
In consideration of the Consultant's provision of the professional services in compliance
with all terns and conditions of this Agreement, COUNTY shall pay the Consultant according to
the terms set forth in Attachment "A". This Agreement has a not -to -exceed amount of Forty Nine
Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($49,900.00).
3. Time of Performance
A. All work and other professional services provided under this Agreement must be
completed by the following date: September 30, 2018.
B. The Consultant shall be prepared to provide the professional services in an
expedient and efficient manner in order to complete the work by the times specified.
4. Performance Standards, Indemnification's, & Release.
A. As an experienced and qualified consulting professional, the Consultant shall
provide information which reflects normal professional and industry standards, procedures, and
performances. The Consultant shall perform the services as set forth in the Statement of Work
(Attachment "A"), the selection and supervision of personnel, and the performance of other
services under this Agreement, pursuant to the standard of performance in the profession. The
Consultant will exercise diligence and due care and perform in a good and workmanlike manner
all of the services pursuant to this Agreement. Approval of COUNTY shall not constitute, or be
vol. W W Pg. 8S
deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant, its employees, agents, or
associates for the exercise of skill and diligence to promote the accuracy and competency of their
designs, information, plans, specifications or any other document, nor shall COUNTY's approval
be deemed to be the assumption of responsibility by COUNTY for any defect or error in the
aforesaid documents prepared by the Consultant, its employees, or subcontractors.
B. Within 60 days from the date of providing any service or item hereunder, should
such service or item provided by Consultant be found to be defective by COUNTY, COUNTY
shall identify the nature of such deficiency in writing and Consultant shall, within 30 days from
the date of receipt of such notice attempt to correct, re -perform or replace the defective services
or item.
THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND
CONDITIONS EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.
C. The Consultant is an independent Contractor. The Consultant shall be responsible
for the professional services and the final work product contemplated under this Agreement.
Except for materials furnished by COUNTY, the Consultant shall supply all materials,
equipment, and labor required for the professional services to be provided under this Agreement.
The Consultant shall have ultimate control over the execution of the professional services. The
Consultant shall have the sole obligation to employ, direct, control, supervise, manage,
discharge, and compensate all of its employees or subcontractors, and COUNTY shall have no
control of or supervision over the employees of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's
subcontractors.
D. Both parties shall employ reasonable standards for promoting safety, health and
environmental protection and for ensuring safe working environments for their personnel.
Whenever Consultant's performance of the work involves visits to or work on COUNTY
controlled facilities or sites, COUNTY is responsible for the adequacy, stability, safety, and legal
compliance of the working environment, including reasonable measures to mitigate or control
relevant risks. The Consultant must at all times exercise reasonable safety precautions and
comply with all existing safety rules, regulations and procedures for site safety. The Consultant
shall, likewise, be responsible to see that its agents, employees and subcontractors exercise
reasonable safety precautions and are in compliance with all existing safety rules, regulations and
procedures for site safety. It is expressly understood and agreed that COUNTY shall not be liable
or responsible for the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, employees, agents,
subcontractors, invitees, licensees, and other persons. COUNTY shall inform Consultant without
undue delay of. (i) any actual or potential health, safety and environmental risk of which
COUNTY is aware and which is reasonably relevant to the performance of the work; and (ii) any
of COUNTY's implemented or planned measures against such risks that COUNTY requires
Vol, Pp, �G
Consultant's personnel to adhere to. Consultant or its personnel may refuse to carry out any
activity, or visit any area or site, if Consultant or its personnel in their sole discretion consider
that relevant risks are unacceptable or not adequately addressed, contained, or otherwise
mitigated. Any such decision shall suspend both parties' obligations under this Agreement
without any liability or penalties until the parties have agreed on how to proceed.
E. Responsibility for damage claims (indemnification): Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and save harmless COUNTY and all its officers, agents, and employees from third
party suits, actions, or claims brought for or on account of any death, bodily injury or direct
property damage to the extent caused by the Consultant's negligent performance of the work, or
by or on account of claims or amounts recovered under the Worker's Compensation Law or
other law, ordinance, order or decree. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and save harmless
COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees in accordance with this indemnification clause
regardless of whether the injury or damage is caused in part by COUNTY, its officers, agents or
employees; however such indemnification shall extend only to that portion of the damage caused
by Consultant's negligence. COUNTY agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to defend,
indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from any suits, actions, or claims arising out of
COUNTY's negligent performance of its obligations hereunder.
In no event shall either party be liable to the other for any indirect, consequential,
exemplary, special, incidental or punitive damages including, without limitation, lost profits or
revenues even if such damages are foreseeable or the damaged party has been advised of the
possibility of such damages. The liability of Consultant for any claim whatsoever related to or
arising under this Agreement, including any cause of action in Agreement, tort or strict liability,
shall not exceed the total amount of payments made to Consultant hereunder or $100,000,
whichever is less.
F. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, due to the
advisory nature of the work being performed under the Scope of Work in this
Agreement, COUNTY agrees that Consultant is operating in an advisory position only.
2. Consultant's Insurance.
The Consultant agrees to maintain the minimum insurance coverage and comply with each
condition set forth below during the duration of this Agreement with the COUNTY. All parties
to this Agreement hereby agree that the Consultant's coverage will be primary in the event of a
loss, regardless of the application of any other insurance or self-insurance.
A. Consultant must deliver to COUNTY a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing such
policies are in full force and effect within ten (10) business days of notification of the
COUNTY's intent to award an Agreement. Failure to meet the insurance requirements and
provide the required certificate(s) and any necessary endorsements within ten (10) business days
may cause the Agreement to be rejected. The COUNTY reserves the right to review these
PO,
requirements and to modify insurance coverage and their limits when deemed necessary and
prudent; however no modification in insurance shall be enforceable unless agreed to in writing
by the Consultant.
1. Workers' Compensation Insurance & Employers' Liability Insurance — In
consideration of the COUNTY'S waiver of the requirement of providing evidence of
Workers' Compensation Insurance & Employers' Liability Insurance, Consultant agrees
that only Steven J. Manchester shall perform the work pursuant to this Agreement.
2. Business Automobile Liability Insurance - Consultant shall maintain Business
Automobile Liability insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident.
Business Auto Liability shall be written on a standard ISO version Business Automobile
Liability, or its equivalent, providing coverage for all owned, non -owned and hired
automobiles. Consultant shall provide Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the COUNTY
and its agents, officers, officials, and employees.
B. Policy Limits - Required limits may be satisfied by a combination of primary and
umbrella or excess liability policies. Consultant agrees to endorse COUNTY and its agents,
officers, officials, and employees as an additional insured, unless the Certificate states the
Umbrella or Excess Liability provides coverage on a pure "True Follow Form" basis.
C. Deductibles, Coinsurance Penalties & Self -Insured Retention - Consultant may
maintain reasonable and customary deductibles. Consultant shall agree to be fully and solely
responsible for any costs or expenses as a result of a coverage deductible, coinsurance penalty, or
self-insured retention.
D. Acceptability of Insurers - Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies
admitted to do business in Texas and rated A-: VI or better by AM Best Insurance Rating or
equivalent.
E. Evidence of Insurance — A valid certificate of insurance verifying each of the
coverages required shall be issued directly to the COUNTY within 10 business days by the
successful Consultant's insurance agent or insurance company after Agreement award.
Endorsements must be submitted with the certificate. No Agreement shall be effective until the
required certificates have been received and approved by the COUNTY. Renewal certificates
shall be sent a within thirty (3 0) days of renewal to coverage expiration.
The certificate of insurance and all notices shall be sent to
BRAZOS COUNTY
200 S. Texas. Ave., Ste. 320
Bryan, TX 77803
Failure of the COUNTY to demand evidence of full compliance with these insurance
requirements or failure of the COUNTY to identify a deficiency shall not be construed as a
waiver of Consultant's obligation to maintain such insurance.
F. Notice of Cancellation, Non -renewal, Material Change, and Exhaustion of Limits
— Consultant must provide minimum thirty (30) days prior written notice to the COUNTY of
policy cancellation, material change, exhaustion of aggregate limits, or intent not to renew
insurance coverage. If COUNTY is notified a required insurance coverage will cancel or non -
renew during the Agreement period, the Consultant shall agree to furnish prior to the expiration
of such insurance, a new or revised certificate(s) as proof that equal and like coverage is in
effect. The COUNTY reserves the right to withhold payment to Consultant until coverage is
reinstated.
G. Consultant's Failure to Maintain Insurance — If the Consultant fails to maintain
the required insurance, the COUNTY shall have the right, but not the obligation, to withhold
payment to Consultant until coverage is reinstated or to terminate the Agreement.
H. No Representation of Coverage Adequacy - The requirements as to types and
limits, as well as the COUNTY's review or acceptance of insurance coverage to be maintained
by Consultant, is not intended to nor shall in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and
obligations assumed by the Consultant under the Agreement.
3. Termination
A. COUNTY may terminate this Agreement at any time upon thirty (30) calendar
day's written notice. Upon the Consultant's receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall cease
work immediately. The Consultant shall be compensated for the services satisfactorily performed
prior to the termination date.
B. If, through any cause, the Consultant fails to fulfill its obligations under this
Agreement, or if the Consultant violates any of the terms of this Agreement, and fails to cure
same within ten (10) days of COUNTY's written notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement,
COUNTY has the right to terminate this Agreement. The Consultant will be compensated for the
services performed in accordance with Attachment "A" before the termination date.
C. No term or provision of this Agreement shall be construed to relieve the
Consultant of liability to COUNTY for damages sustained by COUNTY because of any breach
of Agreement by the Consultant. COUNTY may withhold payments to the Consultant for the
purpose of setoff until the exact amount of damages due COUNTY from the Consultant is
determined and paid.
4. Miscellaneous Terms.
Vol. _ ,� s� Pg. X %'
A. This Agreement has been made under and shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Texas. Jurisdiction and venue for any matter arising out of this Agreement shall be a
court of competent jurisdiction located in Brazos County, Texas.
B. Notices shall be mailed to the addresses designated herein or as may be
designated in writing by the parties from time to time and shall be deemed received when sent
postage prepaid U.S. Mail to the following addresses:
If intended for BRAZOS COUNTY, to:
Name: Duane Peters
Title: County Judge
Address: 200 S. Texas. Ave., Ste. 320, Bryan, Texas 77803
If intended for the Consultant, to:
Name: Steven J. Manchester
Title: President
Address: 1980 Post Oak Blvd., St. 1500, Houston, Texas 77056
C. No waiver by either party hereto of any term or condition of this Agreement shall
be deemed or construed to be a waiver of any other term or condition or subsequent waiver of the
same term or condition.
D. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between
COUNTY and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or
agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may only be amended by written instrument
approved and executed by the parties.
E. This Agreement and all rights and obligations contained herein may not be
assigned by the Consultant without the prior written approval of COUNTY.
F. The Consultant, its agents, employees, and subcontractors must comply with all
applicable federal and state laws and ordinances of Brazos County, Texas, and with all
applicable rules and regulations promulgated by local, state, and national boards, bureaus, and
agencies. The Consultant must obtain all necessary permits and licenses required in completing
the work and providing the services required by this Agreement.
G. Consultant will notify COUNTY immediately in writing if Consultant becomes
aware of a possible conflict between Consultant and COUNTY, Inc., and one or more of
Consultant's governmental or private clients.
H. The parties acknowledge that they have read, understood, and intend to be bound
by the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Vol. Pg.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed by their
respective duly authorized representatives.
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS MFE, LLC.
L os� —
E. Duane Peters Steven J. Manchester
County Judge President
Date: 1I g(o ( 1-1 Date: /0-1-0
V
L
Z0
14..E
0
MFE LLC
1980 Post Oak Blvd St 1500
Houston, TX 77056
SOW 09122017 Agreement to Perform Consulting Services: Brazos County
Date
September 12, 2017
Services Performed By:
MFE LLC
1980 Post Oak Blvd St 1500
Houston, TX 77056
Services Performed For:
Brazos County
This Statement of Work (SOW) is issued pursuant to the Consultant Services Master Agreement between Brazos
County("Chent') and MFE LLC ("Contractor"), effective September 12, 2017 (the "Agreement"). This SOW is
subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Agreement between the parties and is made a part thereof. Any
term not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning specified in the Agreement. In the event of any confect or
inconsistency between the terms of this SOW and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this SOW shall govern
and prevail.
This SOW # 09122017 (hereinafter called the "SOW"), effective as of September 12, 2017, is entered into by and
between Contractor and Client, and is subject to the terms and conditions specified below. The Exhibit(s) to this
SOW, if any, shall be deemed to be a part hereof. In the event of any inconsistencies between the terms of the body
of this SOW and the terms of the Exhibit(s) hereto, the terms of the body of this SOW shall prevail.
Period of Performance
The Services shall commence on September 12, 2017, and shall continue through September 12, 2018.
Engagement Resources
Scope of Work
Consultant shall provide the Services and Deliverable(s) as follows:
MFE will provide overall leadership and Project Management for Economic Development and other projects or
duties as assigned. MFE will report directly to the County Judge or County Attorney on all matters.
Statement of Nark farBraVx Carney •Sephmbcr 12, 2017
E01.
Deliverable Materials
Contractor Responsibilities
MM will be responsible for all its own associated costs
Client Responsibilities
Client will be responsible fat all costs associated with the project, travel, permits, etc.
Fee Schedule
This engagement will be conducted on a fee basis. The total value for the Services pursuant to this SOW shall not
exceed $49,999.00 unless otherwise agreed to by both parties via the project change control procedure, as outlined
within. A PCR will be issued specifying the amended value.
Upon completion of this Performance Period, Consultant and Client will have the option to renew this agreement
for an additional then -stated number of hours at the then -current hourly rate for those resources identified.
Statement ofWorkforBmtiar CwetV • September 12, 2017
F -.=
Pg. -
Out -of -Pocket Expenses / Invoice Procedures
If MFE LLC is asked to travel outside of the Houston, Texas area, the client will be invoiced all costs associated
with out-of-pocket expenses (including, without limitation, costs and expenses associated with meals, lodging, local
transportation and any other applicable business expenses) listed on the invoice as a separate line item.
Invoices shall be submitted monthly in arrears, referencing this Chenes SOW Number to the address indicated
above. Each invoice will reflect charges for the time period being billed and cumulative figures for previous periods.
Terms of payment for each invoice are due upon receipt by Client of a proper invoice. Contractor shall provide
Client with sufficient details to support its invoices, including time sheets for services performed and expense
receipts and justifications for authorized expenses, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. payments for services
invoiced that are not received within 10 -days from date of invoice will be subject to a 5% penalty per calendar
month and services will stop.
Upon signing this SOW depending on the length of the contract a retainer will be required upon signing.
Retainer
Upon agreement of the scope and terns NTE will invoice the Client for a retainer hued on the anticipated amount
of expenses and work to be performed before beginning the work. This will be based on an anticipated one month's
work or one billing cycle. This retainer will be held till the end of project and billed against on the last invoice. The
retainer for this project will be 20.00 and due upon signing an agreement.
Completion Criteria
Contractor shall have fulfilled its obligations when any one of the following fust occurs:
• Contractor and/or Client has the right to cancel services or deliverables not yet provided with 30 business days
advance written notice to the other party.
Assumptions
Project Change Control Procedure
The following process will be followed if a change to this SOW is required:
Star -41 of 1vork forB_V$ C-401 • Sv"ivr 12,
va. pg_
• A Project Change Request (PCR) will be the vehicle for communicating change. The PCR must describe the
change, the rationale for the change, and the effect the change will have on the project.
• The County Judge or County Attorney (Contractor or Client) will review the proposed change and determine
whether to submit the request to the other party.
• A written Change Authorization and/or PCR must be signed by both parties to authorize implementation of
the changes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this SOW to be effective as of the day, month and
year first written above.
Brazos County
By: _
Name: ^1. ^ Name:
Title: vl/l3M Title:
Sraremear ofWorkfor BmVr Commry • Sejmember 12, 2017
MFE LLC
:
;r
Steven anchester
President
13
FIFTH RENEWAL TO LEASE AGREEMENT
MILLICAN FIRE STATION
This Fifth Renewal to Lease Agreement ("Fifth Renewal") is made and executed by and between
BRAZOS COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT #1, P.O. Box 244, Wellborn, Texas 77881, as "Lessor',
and BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, 200 S. Texas Ave., Suite 332, Bryan, Texas, 77803, as "Lessee".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Lessor and Lessee entered into the original Lease ("Lease") on October 16, 2012;
and
WHEREAS, the Lease further provides a fixed monthly rental for the initial term of the Lease and
the subsequent renewal term in the amount of $100.00, payable in monthly installments on the first day
of each month for the term of the Lease, and any subsequent renewal terms; and
WHEREAS, the Lessor and Lessee have agreed to renew the Lease for one (1) additional year
beginning October 1, 2017 and terminating on September 30,2018;
NOW, THEREFORE, for the consideration stated herein, the Lessor and Lessee agree to the
following amendments to the Lease.
AGREEMENT
1. Renewal Term. This fifth renewal term ("Fifth Renewal Term") shall be effective October 1,
2017 and will terminate September 30, 2018. Additional subsequent renewal terms will be
subject to the terms and conditions of the Lease and this Fifth Renewal. If there are any
conflicts between this Fifth Renewal and the Lease, the terms of this Fifth Renewal will control.
This Fifth Renewal Term shall be conditioned on the same terms set forth in the Lease, save and
except those terms that are amended herein.
2. Rent. The fixed monthly rental for the Fifth Renewal Term of the Lease is $100.00 per month,
payable on the first day of each month for the Fifth Renewal Term of the Lease.
3. No Amendments. Except as expressly modified herein, the Lease is not amended.
4. Signatures. This Fifth Renewal and all other copies of this Fifth Renewal, insofar as they relate to
the rights, duties, and remedies of the parties, shall be deemed to be one agreement. This Fifth
Renewal may be executed concurrently in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The
parties expressly agree that a copy of this Fifth Renewal transmitted by facsimile or email that
contains the signature of one of the parties, shall for all purposes be treated as an original and
shall be binding against the parties hereto.
5. This Renewal shall be effective for all purposes as of the date set forth below.
6. Miscellaneous Provisions.
a. Notices. Any notice required by or permitted under the Lease or this Fifth Renewal
must be in writing. Any notice required by this Fifth Renewal or Lease will be deemed to
be delivered (whether actually received or not) when deposited with the United States
Postal Service, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed
to the intended recipient at the address shown in the Lease. Notice may also be given by
regular mail, personal delivery, courier delivery, facsimile transmission, or other
commercially reasonable means and will be effective when actually received. Any
address for notice may be changed by written notice delivered as provided herein.
Copies of each notice must be given by one of these methods to the attorney of the
party to whom notice is given.
b. Entire Agreement. The Lease and this Fifth Renewal, constitute the entire agreement of
the Lessor and Lessee. There are no oral representations, warranties, agreements, or
promises pertaining to the Lease or Fifth Renewal by Lessor or Lessee.
c. Severability. In the event that any provisions or portion of this Agreement is held to be
unenforceable or invalid, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions or
portions shall not be affected.
Dated this _ AA1 . ofy-,p7Bm 1mg 201Z.
Attest:
Lessor:
BRAZOS COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICE
DISTRICT#1
By:
Name:',019' GN
Title: Zeglogcyveroe
Lessee:
Vol. ')— 57 Pp.g% 7
iq
YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS, INC.
SERVICE AGREEMENT
PARTIES
This agreement is made between Youth Advocate Programs, Inc. (YAP, Inc.) 2007 North
Third Street, Harrisburg, PA 17102 (Tax ID# 23-1977514) and Brazos County, 1904
HWY 21 W, Bryan, Texas, 77803.
PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT
It is agreed upon by both parties that YAP, Inc. will provide Reintegration Services for
Brazos County youth and families. Both parties agree to hold regularly scheduled
meetings (at minimum monthly or as often as needed) to asses and evaluate the program.
Services to be provided are further described in the "SCOPE OF SERVICES" section of
this agreement.
TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this agreement shall begin September 1, 2017 and end no later than August
31, 2018. The agreement shall be eligible for automatic renewal annually upon mutual
agreement of both parties as long as sufficient funding is available for the program
services.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
YAP will meet any and all reporting or documentation requirements from the Texas
Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) and Brazos County. YAP, Inc. will provide youth's
names, PID # (juvenile number), age, race, date assigned to YAP, name of advocate
assigned, list of all activities advocate performs with youth, and each day /time they
meet; with the date, time, and activity listed and hours for each activity closely
calculated, using the 15 minute increment time system. YAP activities will meet Brazos
County Juvenile Probation Officers' needs and wishes per the youths' case plans and
YAP will communicate with the assigned Juvenile Probation Officer on a regular basis.
YAP agrees to fulfill the grant proposal as submitted to TJJD and as was approved for
funding using only programs and services that are research driven or evidence -based as
described in the grant proposal and as approved by the Brazos County Juvenile Services
Department. Verification of services will come from monthly invoices, probation officer
meetings with youth and families, as well as ongoing meetings with the YAP Program
Director. A Brazos County Juvenile Services Department Deputy Director will provide
oversight for this program and will also verify services.
Youth will receive an average of 10 hours a week (depending on individual needs) of
face to face services within their home, school, and community at times most needed by
the youth and family (such as evenings and weekends). Services may be delivered in
BCJS & YAP Contract 2017-2018 Page 1
vol. asp P9,
individual, group, or family settings based on their individual plan. YAP staff will be
available on 24 hours, 7 days a week.
The complete Program Description for Brazos County is outlined in the attached
Proposal to Provide Reintegration Services for Brazos County. (Attachment A)
COMPENSATION. HOURLY RATES AND BII.LING
Upon referral, Brazos County Juvenile Services Department agrees to pay YAP, Inc.
$36.00 per hour per youth, not to exceed $187,160.00.
YAP, Inc. will bill Brazos County Juvenile Services Department on a monthly basis for
all services provided. The invoice will contain the hours of service and the number of
days billed. Payments shall be mailed to:
Youth Advocate Programs, Inc.
P. O. Box 950
Harrisburg, PA 17108
INSURANCE
YAP, Inc. agrees to maintain all appropriate and sufficient liability insurance. Proof of
coverage will be provided to Brazos County Juvenile Services Department upon request.
A copy of YAP's Certificate of Insurance has been reviewed and is attached.
CONFIDENTIALITY
Service Provider shall maintain strict confidentiality of all information and records
relating to children involved in Juvenile Probation, and shall not re -disclose the
information except as required to perform the services to be provided pursuant to this
Agreement, or as may be required by law.
ASSIGNMENT
The parties may not assign or delegate to third parties any rights or duties under this
agreement without the express written consent of both parties.
CANCELLATION
Either party may terminate this agreement before the expiration date of the agreement
upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party, when deemed necessary by either
party.
NOTICES
Any notice under this agreement may be given to either party in person or by mail at the
address given in paragraph A.
Youth Advocate Programs, Inc. (YAP, Inc) efforts on behalf of troubled young people
are community-based, meaning that YAP Inc offers family -focused programming and
strives to help young people take advantage of beneficial resources that are available near
their homes. Although some of these resources may be connected in some way to a
religious or political group, YAP Inc. employees will not independently encourage YAP
BCJS & YAP Contract 2017-2018 Page 2
Inc. clients to follow the teachings of a specific religious group or to join a specific
political party.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This document contains the entire agreement between the parties. No amendment to this
agreement shall be valid unless it is in writing and signed by both parties.
DUTY TO REPORT
As required by §§261.101 and 261.405 of the Texas Family Code, Service Provider shall
report any allegation or incident of abuse, exploitation or neglect of any child (including
but not limited to a juvenile that has been placed by Juvenile Probation) within twenty-
four (24) hours from the time the allegation is made, to all of the following:
A. Local Law enforcement agency.
B. Texas Juvenile Justice Department by submitting a TJJD Incident
Report Form via email to abusene lg ectaa tied.texas.sov (or if unable to complete
the form within 24 hours, then by call toll-free 1.877.786.7263
(1.877.STOP.ANE), followed by submitting the report within 24 hours of said
call); and
C. Brazos County Juvenile Probation Department to facsimile number
(979) 823-4211 (ATTN: Chief Probation Officer).
CRIMINAL HISTORY SEARCHES
Criminal history searches shall be conducted by Service Provider, at the expense of the
Service Provider, for any and all of its employees, interns, volunteers or
contractors providing services in a juvenile justice facility or juvenile justice
program that may have direct unsupervised access to children in the facility or
program.
Criminal history searches shall include the following:
A. Texas criminal history fingerprint -based criminal history background search
through the Texas Department of Public Safety.
B. Local law enforcement sex offender registration records check through the
Public Sex Offender Registry on the Texas Department of Public Safety
website.
C. Federal Bureau of Investigation fingerprint -based criminal history background
search at the National Crime Information Center; intemet-based searches shall
not be used to conduct this background search.
A copy of the initial criminal history report required by this Agreement and any reports
reflecting subsequent criminal activity shall be maintained for monitoring
purposes for whichever of the following occurs later: duration of the individual's
BCJS & YAP Contract 2017-2018 Page 3
Vol. P9. i ��
employment or period of service; minimum of three (3) years; or until any
pending litigation, claim, audit or review and all questions arising there from have
been resolved.
As used within this Agreement, a disqualifying criminal history is a history that includes
any one of the following:
A. A felony conviction against the laws of this state, another state, or the United
States within the past ten (10) years;
B. A deferred adjudication for a felony against the laws of this state, another
state, or the United States within the past ten (10) years;
C. A current felony deferred adjudication, probation or parole;
D. Ajailable misdemeanor conviction against the laws of this state, another state,
or the United States within the past five (5) years;
E. A deferred adjudication for a jailable misdemeanor against the laws of this
state, another state, or the United States within the past five (5) years;
F. A current jailable misdemeanor deferred adjudication, probation or parole; or
G. The requirement to register as a sex offender under Chapter 62 of the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure.
In addition to the criteria and time frames set forth in the above definition of
disqualifying criminal history, an individual must not have direct unsupervised
access to children in a facility or program until at least one year has elapsed since
the completion of any period of incarceration, community supervision, or parole.
Any of Service Provider's employees, intems, volunteers or contractors with a
disqualifying criminal history shall be prohibited from having direct unsupervised
access to children in a juvenile justice facility or a juvenile justice program.
Juvenile Probation reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to prohibit any
individual with a prior criminal history from being placed in a position that
involves direct unsupervised contact with children.
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
Service Provider warrants that, prior to entering this contract, it has verified and disclosed
the following information to Juvenile Probation, and agrees that it shall have an ongoing
affirmative duty under this Agreement to promptly ascertain and disclose in sufficient
detail this same information to Juvenile Probation:
BCJS & YAP Contract 2017-2018 Page 4
Vol. Pg. c' i
A. Any and all corrective action required by any of Service provider's
licensing authorities;
B. Any and all litigation filed against the Service Provider, or against its
employees, interns, volunteers, subcontractors, agents and/or consultants
that have direct contract with juveniles.
C. Any arrest of any employee, intem, volunteer, subcontractor, agent
and/or consultant of the Service Provider that has direct contact with
juveniles.
D. Any finding of "Reason to Believe" by a state regulatory agency in a
child abuse, neglect and exploitation investigation where an employee,
intern, volunteer, subcontractor, agent and/or consultant of Service
Provider that has direct contact with juveniles was the alleged or
designated perpetrator.
E. The identity of any of State Provider's employees, interns, volunteers,
subcontractors, agents and/or consultants that have direct contact with
juveniles that are registered sex offenders; and
F. The identity of any of State Provider's employees, interns, volunteers,
subcontractors, agents and/or consultants that have director contact with
juveniles that have a criminal history. For the purpose of this Agreement,
the term "criminal history" shall include: (1) current felony or
misdemeanor probation or parole; (2) a felony conviction or deferred
adjudication within the past 10 years; or (3) a jailable misdemeanor
conviction or deferred adjudication within the past five years.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
Service Provider agrees to respect and protect the civil and legal rights of all children and
their parents. It will not unlawfully discriminate against any employee, prospective
employee, child, childcare provider, or parent on the basis of age, race, sex, religion,
disability or national origin. Service Provider shall abide by all applicable federal, state
and local laws and regulations.
ASSIGNMENT & SUBCONTRACT
No officer, employee or agent of Juvenile Probation and no member of its governing
body and no other public officials of the governing body of the locality or localities in
which the project is situated or being carried who exercise any functions or
responsibilities in the project, shall participate in any decision relating to this Agreement
which affects or conflicts with his/her personal interest or have any personal or pecuniary
interest, direct or indirect, in his Agreement or the proceeds thereof.
DEFAULT
Juvenile Probation may issue written notice of default to Service provider, terminate the
whole or any part of this agreement, as it deems appropriate, in any one of the following
circumstances:
A. If Service Provider fails to perform the work called for by this Agreement
within the time specified herein or any extension thereof, or
BCJS & YAP Contract 2017-2018 Page 5
Vol. pg.
B. If Service Provider fails to perform any of the other material provisions of
this Agreement, including failure to achieve the defined goals, outcomes,
and outputs, or so fails to prosecute the work as to endanger the
performance of this Agreement in accordance with its terns, and
C. In either of these two circumstances after receiving notice of default,
Service Provider, does not cure such failure within a period of ten (10)
days.
YAP will immediately (within 24 hours) notify the chief or designee of any problems or
failures by YAP with meeting contract obligations or in providing required
services to youth in a timely manner.
WAIVER OF SUBROGATION
Service Provider expressly waives any and all rights it may have to subrogation to any
claims or rights of its employees, agents, owners, officers, or subcontractors against
Juvenile Probation. Service Provider also waives any rights it may have to
indemnification from Juvenile Probation.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, YAP, Inc. shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless Brazos county, its elected officials, appointed officials, officers, directors,
employees, agents and representatives (collectively referred to as the "indemnitees")
from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, losses, costs, and expenses,
including, but not limited to, attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or occurring
in connection with the performance of the work, provided that such claim, liability,
damages, loss, costs or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, or
death or to injury to, or destruction of, tangible property, including the loss of use
thereof in any way occurring, incident to, arising out of or in connection with: (a) a
breach of the warranties provided by YAP, Inc.; (b) the work performed or to be
performed by YAP, Inc., employees and agents; (c) any negligent action and/or omission
of the indemnitees related in any way to the project whether the indemnitees are
negligent in whole or in part, and even when the loss is caused by the sole fault or
negligence (including acts or omissions that are characterized as negligence per se,
negligence premised on strict liability, or any other type of negligence) of the
indemnitees; or (d) any fines, penalties, damages (including punitive), liabilities, costs
and expenses in connection with: (1) a violation of any law, statute, Wile, ordinance,
code or other requirement of public authorities; (2) means, methods, procedures or
sequences of execution or performance of the work; and (3) failure to secure and pay for
permits, fees, approvals, licenses and inspections for which YAP, Inc. is responsible
under the agreement documents. Yap, Inc.'s indemnity obligation herein shall not be
construed to negate, abridge or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that
would otherwise exist as to a party or person described in this section. The scope and
extent of this indemnity shall not be limited by the availability of coverage under YAP,
Inc.'s insurance and shall not limit indemnitees' other legal remedies against contractor
BCJS & YAP Contract 2017-2018 Page 6
Vol. Pg. 103
or any other person or entity. This indemnification provision shall survive termination
of the agreement.
This Agreement is expressly made subject to Brazos County's Sovereign Immunity, Title
5 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code, and all applicable federal and state
law. The parties expressly agree that no provision of this Agreement is in any way
intended to constitute a waiver or any immunities from suit or from liability that the
Brazos County has by operation of law. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to benefit
any third party beneficiary.
REPRESENTATIONS & WARRANTIES
Service Provider hereby represents and warrants the following:
A. That it has all necessary right, title, license and authority to enter into this
Agreement;
B. That it is qualified to do business in the State of Texas; that it holds all
necessary licenses and staff certifications to provide the type(s) of services
being contracted for, that it is in compliance with all statutory and
regulatory requirements for the operation of its business; and that there are
no taxes due and owing of the State of Texas, any County in the State of
Texas, or any political subdivision thereof:
C. That it carries sufficient insurance to provide protection to Juvenile
Probation under the indemnity provisions, as well as for any potential
liabilities that arise from or related to this Agreement; and
D. That all of its employees, interns, volunteers, subcontractors, agents and/or
consultants will be properly trained to report allegations or incidents of
abuse, exploitation or neglect of a juvenile in accordance with the
requirements of Texas Family Code Chapter 261 and any applicable Texas
Juvenile Justice Department's administrative rules regarding abuse,
neglect and exploitation allegations.
TEXAS LAW TO APPLY
This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of
Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Brazos
County, Texas.
PREA
Service Provider shall comply with all federal, state, county, and city laws, ordinances,
regulations and standards applicable to the provision of services described herein and the
performance of all obligations undertaken pursuant to this Contract, including the Prison
Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA) which establishes a zero -tolerance standard
against sexual assault of incarcerated persons, including juveniles, and addresses the
detection, elimination, prevention, and reporting of sexual assault in facilities housing
adult and juvenile offenders.
BCIS & YAP Contract 2017-2018 Page 7
va. � S'9 P9. A/ y
VENUE
Exclusive venue for any litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in Brazos County,
Texas.
LEGAL CONSTRUCTION
In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any
reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality, or unenforceable provision shall not affect any other provision thereof and this
Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or enforceable provision has
never been contained therein.
PRIOR AGREEMENTS SUPERSEDED
This Agreement constitutes the sole and only Agreement for the parties hereto and
supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral Agreement between the parties
respecting the within subject matter
ON , 20 FULLY EXECUTED IN
DUPLICATE, EACH OF WHICH SHALL HAVE THE FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
OF AN ORIGINAL.
ZS CO TY MISSIONERS C
Duane Peters, County Judge
Brazos County Juvenile Board Chairman
Doug Vance, PhD, Executive Director
Brazos County Juvenile Services Department
Youth Advocate Programs, Inc.
Richard Stottlemyer II, CFO
Ci/acplr-I
Date
Date
Date
BCJS &YAP Contract 2017-2018 Page 8
Vol. —SA� Pg. ��
IG
BRAZOS COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS' COURT
ACTION FORM
DEPARTMENT: Road & Bridge
MEETING DATE: September 26, 2017
SUBJECT: Donation of Public Utility Easement
Acceptance of Public Utility Easement from Brent Mullins and Leisha S. Mullins for
0.049 acre of land to replace part of public utility easement acquired for roadway right of
way on Cherokee Drive located in Precinct 1.
SUBMITTED BY:
<�Q'wj.-���
Darrell W. Kolwes
Right of Way Agent
ACKNOWLEDGED BY:
Steve Aldrich
Commissioner Precinct 1
This request is VAPPROVED / ❑ DENIED by Commissioners' Court
U snt��
Duane Peters, County Judge
DATE: 9 f o2(d 11
vol. Pp.--
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: IF YOU ARE A NATURAL PERSON,
YOU MAY REMOVE OR STRIKE ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION FROM ANY INSTRUMENT THAT TRANSFERS AN INTEREST IN
REAL PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS:
YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
Cherokee Drive
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN
BY THESE PRESENTS:
GRANTOR(S): Brent Mullins a/k/a Edward B. Mullins and Leisha S. Mullins
Grantor's Mailing Address:
P. O. Box 9599
College Station, Texas 77842-9599
GRANTEE: BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
Grantee's Mailing Address:
300 East 26th Street
Bryan, Texas •7780?
CONSIDERATION:
Ten and No/100 dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged.
PROPERTY:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land being 0.049 of one acre situated in the J. M.
BARRERA SURVEY, Abstract No. 68, Brazos County, Texas and being a part of
Lots 4 and 5, Indian Oaks Subdivision of record in Volume 361, Page 593, Deed
Records of Brazos County, Texas and being further described as Lot 4 being 5.00
acres in Assignment of Contract of Veterans Land Board Contract of Sale and
Purchase from Ronald R. Green to Edward B. Mullins of record in Volume 922, Page
797, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and Lot 5 being 5.00 acres described
in Deed from J. T. Gidley, et ux, to Brent Mullins of record in Volume 2567, Page
109, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas; said 0.049 of one acre being more
particularly described by metes and bounds description as shown in Exhibit "A
attached hereto and made a part hereof for all intents and purposes.
Vt�l. pg.
This conveyance shall grant the rights herein specified only as to that portion of the above described
Property more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A, known as the `Basement Area", and
any additional area outside the Easement Area necessary to install and attach equipment, guy wires,
and anchors necessary and incident to the uses of the Easement Area to erect, construct, install, and
thereafter use, operate, inspect, repair, maintain, reconstruct, modify and remove the following:
Electric transmission and distribution lines;
Water lines and sanitary sewer lines, connecting lines,
access facilities, and related equipment;
Stone sewers and collection facilities;
Television, telephone, and communication lines;
Drainage ditches, drainage pipes and all other
Drainage structures, surface and subsurface;
Upon, over and across the said Property as described and any ways, streets, roads or alleys
abutting same; and to cut, trim and control the growth of trees and other vegetation on and in the
Easement area or on adjoining property of GRANTOR, which might interfere with or threaten
the operation and maintenance of any public utility equipment, accessories, or operations. It
being understood and agreed that any and all equipment and facilities placed upon said Property
shall remain the property of GRANTEE.
GRANTOR hereby expressly acknowledges that it is the owner of this Property.
GRANTOR expressly subordinates all rights of surface use, incident to the mineral estate owned
by GRANTOR, to the above-described uses of said surface by GRANTEE.
Reservations and Restrictions: None
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the rights and interests herein described unto GRANTEE and its
successors and assigns, forever, and GRANTOR does hereby bind itself and its successors and
assigns to warrant and forever defend, all and singular, these rights and interests unto GRANTEE
and its successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming, or to claim
same, or any part thereof.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
Executed this oZO—^FIS
day of e" @v 12017.
Brent Mullins a/k/a Edward B. Mullins
Leisha S. Mullins
Vol. Pfl. C'f
Acknowledgment
STATE OF TEXAS �7 §
COUNTY OF Ar -a -z -of' §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on 9 — d0—a6 I '7 by Brent Mullins a/k/a
Edward B. Mullins and Leisha S. Mullins
DARRELC W KOLWE3
Myly23,20
'1l�Irf s
JuNotary Public, State ofrexas
a..Mq M1✓
Jul
y23,2018
pg. ` `�
EXHIBIT" A"
SHEET 1 OF 3
FIELD NOTES
BRAZOS COUNTY
CHEROKEE DRIVE
RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDENING
0.049 OF ONE ACRE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
OUT OF THE
BRENT MULLINS
REMAINDER OF LOT 4 AND LOT 5
INDIAN OAKS SUBDIVISION
VOLUME 361, PAGE 593
LOT 4 — 5.00 ACRES
VOLUME 922, PAGE 797
LOT 5 — 5.00 ACRES
VOLUME 2567, PAGE 109
J. M. BARRERA SURVEY, A — 68
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SEPTEMBER 11, 2017
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land being 0.049 of one acre situated in the J. M. BARRERA
SURVEY, Abstract No. 68, Brazos County, Texas and being a part of Lot 4 and Lot 5, Indian Oaks
Subdivision of record in Volume 361, Page 593, Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas and being
further described as Lot 4 being 5.00 acres in Assignment of Contract of Veterans Land Board
Contract of Sale and Purchase from Ronald R. Green to Edward B. Mullins of record in Volume 922,
Page 797, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and Lot 5 being 5.00 acres described in deed
from J. T. Gidley et ux to Brent Mullins of record in Volume 2557, Page 109, Official Records of
Brazos County, Texas said 0.049 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds
as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in an existing 20' Utility Easement, 20' from and parallel to the east right-of-
way line of Cherokee Drive over and across said Lot 5 as described in Plat of record in Volume 361,
Page 593 for the most southerly corner, a 3/8" Iron Rod found for the southwest corner of said Lot 5
bears S 1 " 13' 17 " E a distance of 261.68 feet;
THENCE N 5 ° 36' 17 " W, along the existing 20' wide Utility Easement a distance of 127.16 feet to a
point in the recently acquired right-of-way line of said Cherokee Drive as described in Volume 14216,
Page 63 for angle point, a 1/2" Iron Rod with Cap found for angle point of said right-of-way line bears
S 17 " 00 ' 12 " W a distance of 16.52 feet;
THENCE N 17 " 00 ' 12 " E, along the easterly right-of-way line of said Cherokee Drive a distance of
32.27 feet to a point for angle point, said point being located in the existing 20' wide Utility Easement,
20' from and parallel to the southeasterly right-of-way line of said Cherokee Drive, a 1/2" Iron Rod with
Cap found for angle point in said right-of-way line bears N 17 " 00 ' 12 " E a distance of 53.43 feet;
THENCE N 38 " 59' 14 " E, along the existing 20' wide Utility Easement a distance of 53.43 feet to a
point for the most northerly corner, a 3/8" Iron Rod found for the most northerly corner of said Lot 4
bears N 35 ° 34' 16' E a distance of 335.64 feet;
Vd.
THENCE S 17 ° 00' 12 "W, 20' from and parallel to the recently acquired right-of-way of said
Cherokee Drive a distance of 93.43 feet to a point for angle point;
THENCE S 1 ° 43 '43 " W, 20' from and parallel to the recently acquired right-of-way of said
Cherokee Drive a distance of 109.64 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING AN
AREA OF 0.049 OF ONE ACRE OF LAND MORE OR LESS, according to a survey prepared during
the month of September, 2017 under the supervision of H. Curtis Strong, Registered Professional
Land Surveyor No. 4961 and doing business under FIRM Number 10093500. North Orientation is
based on rotating the west line of said Lot 5 to Grid North, NAD83(CORS2011) epoch 2010.00 State
Plane Central Zone. _
CHEROKEE OmVE 130/5935
.,R- Non Rod
UTILnr Ewt T!a 59L_— — — ———
SMILING MALLARD DEVELOPMENT, LTD. Fnd. 1/2- Iran Roe
(TRACT II Called 106.98 Ac. Interior Corner of—�i—�
8765/176 /� Called 106.98 Ac. Trocl
Fnd V2' I.R.e/Cap
BRENT MULLINS
Remainder of LOT 5 - 5.00 AC.
2567/109
LOT 5
INDIAN OAKS SUBDIVISION
REF. 361/593
I. K C-11. Strong. Re91.1ved Pml..abnol Land Surveyor
No. 496L do h ... b, certily (hot this 1111 I. the re.Wl.
or an on In. around survey lertormed ends a, .aporlclan
d.,Wg Sepl.rab.r, 2017 end I. true and c9necl to the b.cl
01 ray hnowl.d9e.
cS!`
0
BRENT MULLINS ♦�
winder of LOT 4 - 5.00 AC.
922/797
LOT 4
INDIAN OAKS SUBDIVISION
REF. 361/593
EXHIBIT'A'
BRAZOS COUNTY
CHEROKEE DRIVE
RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDENING
0.049 OF ONE ACRE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
OUT OF THE
BRENT MULLINS
REMAINDER OF LOT 4 AND LOT 5
` _ INDIAN OAKS SUBDIVISION
ycEFERENCE PLAT VOLUME 361, PAGE 593
LOT 4 - 5.00 ACRES
VOLUME 922, PAGE 797
LOT 5 • 5.00 ACRES
VOLUME 2567, PAGE 109
J. M. BARRERA SURVEY, A • 68
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SCALE: T = SD ' SEPTEMBER 11, 2017
SHEET 3 OF 3
Fnd. 3/8- Iron F
Norlh Corner Lol
TRONG 'm
URVEYING, LLC P1 anFeai979in D'o 6
am n 10093500 erre@.wfso.trm8daa'dYIrtB<orn
rn
NOTES.
\
No'lh Oria.latton ie baled as 1olaliny the Wec1 fl., of cold Lot
to &to Nortb, NADW ICORS 20111 epoch 2010.00, Store %one
Central Zane.
I. K C-11. Strong. Re91.1ved Pml..abnol Land Surveyor
No. 496L do h ... b, certily (hot this 1111 I. the re.Wl.
or an on In. around survey lertormed ends a, .aporlclan
d.,Wg Sepl.rab.r, 2017 end I. true and c9necl to the b.cl
01 ray hnowl.d9e.
cS!`
0
BRENT MULLINS ♦�
winder of LOT 4 - 5.00 AC.
922/797
LOT 4
INDIAN OAKS SUBDIVISION
REF. 361/593
EXHIBIT'A'
BRAZOS COUNTY
CHEROKEE DRIVE
RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDENING
0.049 OF ONE ACRE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
OUT OF THE
BRENT MULLINS
REMAINDER OF LOT 4 AND LOT 5
` _ INDIAN OAKS SUBDIVISION
ycEFERENCE PLAT VOLUME 361, PAGE 593
LOT 4 - 5.00 ACRES
VOLUME 922, PAGE 797
LOT 5 • 5.00 ACRES
VOLUME 2567, PAGE 109
J. M. BARRERA SURVEY, A • 68
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SCALE: T = SD ' SEPTEMBER 11, 2017
SHEET 3 OF 3
Fnd. 3/8- Iron F
Norlh Corner Lol
TRONG 'm
URVEYING, LLC P1 anFeai979in D'o 6
am n 10093500 erre@.wfso.trm8daa'dYIrtB<orn
BRAZOS COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS' COURT
ACTION FORM
DEPARTMENT: Road & Bridge
MEETING DATE: September 26, 2017
SUBJECT: Utility Permit — Frontier Communications
Consider and take action on the Frontier Communications utility permit to conduct a
285' bore within the right of way of Smetana Road. Work will include placing a 4"
PVC conduit a depth of 4 feet below the proposed drainage ditch. Cables will be
pulled through this conduit. Line is being adjusted to accommodate the widening of
Smetana Road. Site is located in Precinct 4.
SUBMITTED BY:
,gL.
Darrell W. Kolwes
Right of Way Agent
ACKNOWLEDGED BY:
Commissioner
This request i APPROVED / 11 DENIED by Commissioners' Court
Duane Peters, County Judge
DATE: A Ig'(z I I 1
Vol. _ r� J—y Pg. /lam
NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED INSTALLATION AND/OR REPAIRS
OF TELEPHONE FACILITIES AND DESIGNATING
PLACEMENT OF UTILITY IN COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY
TO: THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
Comes now FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS [company name], herein after referred to as
"Company" a TEXAS [state] Corporation, with authority to transact business in Texas, acting by and
through its duly authorized representative, and hereby notifies the County Engineer of its intent to lay, construct,
maintain, repair and/or operate a telephone facility under, over, across and/or along certain County Roads as
shown on drawings and diagrams attached hereto and said location described as follows:
Beginning at Frontier Communications manhole 211. Frontier will make a 285ft 4" bore in the R.O. W to
pedestal 7686 at the corner of HWY 21 and Smetana Rd. Bore will be 4" PVC, depth will be 4ft below
the proposed new grade for the county's road project. Buried cable and subduct. will be pulled thru
PVC.
The location and description of the proposed installation and appurtenances must be fully shown on
detailed drawings attached to this Notification.
The Company shall commence actual construction/work in good faith within 60 days from the date of
said permit and shall complete said construction /work within 30 working days..(COMPANY MIDST
FILL IN). If such construction is not begun by the 60th day, Company will be required to provide a new
notice.
Company declares that prior to filing this application, it has ascertained the location of all existing
utilities, both aerial and underground, and the filing of this application is prima facie evidence that the
proposed installation will not conflict with any existing utility.
A copy of this notice shall be kept at the job site any time work is being performed.
In the event of deviation from this notice, the Brazos County Engineer's Office or its designated
representative will be notified as soon as practicable.
Approval of County Engineer's Office may take as long as two weeks after complete application is
received.
Failure to notify the County Engineer's Office within 24 hours of beginning construction shall constitute
grounds for job shutdown.
Vol. P9• ��
By signing below, I certify that I am authorized to represent the Company listed below, and that the
Company agrees to the conditions/provisions included in this notification.
Frontier Communications
Company Name
Brenda Vaidak
By:
&,�)T(10�
Signature
Supervisor -Network Engineer
Title
301 Industrial Blvd., Bryan. Texas 77803
Address
979-821-4770
Phone Number
Brenda.vai dak(olverizon.com
Email
F
c�� P9 //
M
ACCEPTANCE OF NOTIFICATION
Brazos County offers no objection to the proposed location of the utility in the County right of way as
shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated except as noted
below: (Month/Day/Year)
EXCEPTIONS:
Brazos County Engineer
Vol. c9J-!? ?g. / l
I
*LOCATE ALL UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRL
*PLACE 4' BORE WITH PIPE FROM MANHOL
AT CORNER OF SMETANA RD AND HWY 2 -
*DEPTH OF BORE WILL BE 4FT BELOW THE
COUNTY'S ROAD PROJECT
*PULL 360FT OF 300x24 COPPER CABLE AL
*BOND AND GROUND CABLE ACCORDING'
*COUNTY PERMIT REQUIRED
*COUNTY CONTACT DARRELL KOLWES, (9'
*LESLIE CARROLL (979)821-4761
1986)
4+
6+
-5�-7f
WMA
G I �iVllll [f LIV �,/�� PROJECT C.O. AREA:
SNUMBER: EXCH. CODE:
/' DRAWN DATE: PHO E: FILE'
SCALE: TAX DISTRICT: DWG OF
SEC
Vol. �5�� Py. //�h
BRAZOS COUNTY ROADWAY SAFETY AND ROAD
PRESERVATION STANDARDS FOR WORK CONDUCTED IN
BRAZOS COUNTY RIGHTS OF WAY
A. General Requirements
1. Adequate drainage shall be maintained in ditches at all times.
2. Permittee will use best management practices ("BMP") (EPA and TCEQ both provide lists of examples of
BMPs) to minimize erosion and sedimentation resulting from the proposed installation.
3. The permittee shall take precautions to avoid damage to property. All County Right of Way and property
shall be restored to its original condition, as far as practical, in the opinion of the County Engineer or
appointed representative.
4. The construction and maintenance of such utility shall not interfere with the property or rights of a prior
occupant.
5. Permittee shall not interfere with other utilities located in the right of way. In the event damages occur,
permittee will be liable to the County or other utilities running through the right of way.
6. County Engineer shall determine whether or not permittee's plans shall inconvenience the public. If it is
determined that inconvenience to the public exists, then the County Engineer will decide whether such
project will be allowed or if an alternative exists so as not to inconvenience the public.
B. Safety Requirements
1. Proper traffic control measures must be put in place prior to beginning work and remain in place during
the duration of the job. All traffic control measures must follow the Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (TMUTCD). See Traffic Control Requirements below.
2. During construction, all safety regulations of the Texas Department of Transportation shall be observed.
3. Permittee must take such precautions and measures, including placing and displaying safety devices, as
may be necessary, in order to safely conduct the public through the project area. Company shall provide
flagmen, signs, signals or devices necessary to provide complete safety to the public.
4. Adequate provisions must be made to cause minimum inconveniences to traffic and adjacent property
owners.
5. No cable, conduit and/or pole line shall be laid, constructed, maintained and/or repaired so as to constitute
a danger or hazard of any kind to persons or vehicles using such road. Any poles placed in the Right of
Way for future installation shall be placed at the back of the Right of Way. Exceptions may be approved
by the County Engineer.
C Traffrc Control Plan
1. A traffic control plan, pursuant to the TMUTCD or Engineered Traffic Control Plan must be provided
for the following:
a. Any construction (i.e. pit, excavation, hole) left open overnight, requires ,specific nighttime traffic
control measures pursuant to the TMUTCD;
i Vol.l. pg %//�
b. If construction is within ten (10) feet of the roadway; or
c. Any work performed in the road right-of-way;
2. Plan must be attached to the permit and kept at the job site anytime work is being performed.
3. Plan must set forth the time of completion for the job.
D. Desien Standards
1. All overhead installations shall conform to clearance standards of the Texas Department of Transportation
and the pole be placed in the designated area for power specified as set forth in the Texas Utilities Code,
Section 181.045.
2. All pole installation (including lighting) shall be placed at the backside of the Right of Way to ensure
safety to the public. Any pole placed in violation of this requirement will be required to be moved to the
appropriate location at the company's expense. Exceptions may be approved by the County Engineer.
3. All underground installations shall (these are minimum depths — utility may place deeper):
a. be placed at a minimum depth of forty-eight (48) inches below the top of the pavement;
b. be at least thirty-six (36) inches below ditch flow line when installation is within the area measured
from top of bank to top of bank;
c. be at least forty-eight (48) inches below ditch flow line if low pressure gas or petroleum lines. For
high pressure gas and petroleum lines, see High Pressure Pipelines requirements listed below;
d. not be closer than ten (10) feet from the edge of pavement. Exceptions may apply in rights of way of
less than 60 feet.
4. Water Lines: All water lines must be a minimum 36 -inches below the ditch flow line and cased.
Waterlines shall be cased if crossing under the roadway.
5. Utilities in all new developments that have 60 feet or greater of right of way shall be installed within
designated locations based upon the type of utility. The locations shall be as follows: (measured from
back of right-of-way).
Power -0 to 2 feet, nominally 1'
Phone — 2 to 4 feet, nominally 3'
Gas — 4 to 6 feet, nominally 5'
Cable —6 to 8 feet, nominally 7'
6. Utilities with less than 60 feet right-of-way in all new developments shall install the utility in a similar
manner as referenced in No. 3 above; however, the County Engineer or its designated representative will
provide final approval of each utility location.
7. The length of any trench to be opened in advance of the pipe, conduit or ducts may not be longer than 400'
if left open over night or unattended.
Crossings under a county road shall:
a. be bored or jacked. ABSOLUTELY NO OPEN CUTS WITHIN COUNTY ROAD PAVEMENT;
b. be pressure grouted for the full length of the crossing if the annular space between pipe and casing and
soil exceeds one (1) inch. Brazos County must be given 24 hours notice of pressure grouting
operations and have the opportunity to have an inspector on site to observe pressure grouting
operations;
Vol, :,-2 Pq /
c. TxDOT Standard Specification Item 476 shall be followed for all boring, jacking, tunneling and joints.
9. Bore Pits:
a. no pits shall remain open longer than 2 days;
b. all pits shall have proper traffic control measures in place. See Traffic Control Plan listed above.
c. pits shall NOT be located within ten (10) feet from the edge of pavement without prior approval from
the County Engineer or his representative;
d. when pits are to remain open for more than 8 hours, due diligence will be used in protecting the spoil
pile to prevent drainage problems;
e. based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require shoring to protect
pavement integrity;
f. based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require pits be placed
further from the edge of road.
10. Any installation within ten (10) feet of edge of pavement shall meet the following:
a. location must be approved by the County Engineer or his representative
b. backfilled with cement stabilized material.
c. based upon soil conditions, the County Engineer or his representative may require shoring to
protect pavement integrity.
d. all excess water and mud shall be removed from the trench prior to backfilling. Any backfill placed
during a rainy period or at other times where excess water cannot be prevented from entering the
trench will be considered TEMPORARY and shall be replaced with PERMANENT cement stabilized
material as soon as weather permits;
e. all disturbed base and pavement materials shall be removed and restored to the satisfaction of the
County Engineer or his representatives.
f. no side or lateral tamping to fill voids under the base and pavement materials is allowed.
11. Company must be careful to not jeopardize the slope or integrity of the shoulder of the road. In the event
Company damages the slope, shoulder or any other portion of the right-of-way, Company will be
responsible for repairing the damage and replacing the right-of-way to the condition it was prior to
commencing construction.
12. Operation of construction and/or maintenance equipment on the traveled surface of any improved County
road will not be permitted, except in an instance whereby the laying, construction, maintenance and/or
repair of cables, conduits and/or pole lines cannot be accomplished by any other method and in this event
all such equipment shall be of the rubber tire variety. Appropriate traffic control shall be provided
meeting TMUTCD requirements.
13. In the event said construction and/or maintenance and/or repair requires Company to remove, cut or
jeopardize any section of the road (asphalt, cement, road base, etc.), Company will be required to provide
a performance bond or letter of credit securing necessary repairs. Said bond amount will be determined by
the County Engineer.
14. The applicant shall submit a letter of "No Objection" from the Army Corps of Engineers for all
designated wetlands and environmentally sensitive lands.
E. Emerkencv work
1. In the event Company is required to perform emergency services, that requires excavation in a County
Right of Way, and unable to notify the County Engineer prior to conducting emergency repairs, Company
va.� Pg. /�zi
shall notify County Engineer within 24 hours of beginning construction/repairs. This will allow the
County Engineer's Office an opportunity to inspect the site to ensure the integrity of the County Right of
Way and traffic safety controls used.
F. Repairs to existine facilities
1. Maintenance and/or repair to existing cables, conduits, and/or pole lines which require disturbance of the
soil, shall not be performed until plans describing such maintenance and/or repair have been approved by
the County Engineer or its designated representative and a permit has been obtained.
G. Relocation of utilities
1. When and if the County Engineer determines that it is necessary for the construction, repair, improvement,
alteration or relocation of all or any portion of said road, any or all poles, wires, pipes, cables or other
facilities and appurtenances authorized hereunder, shall be removed from said road, or reset or relocated
thereon, as required by the County Engineer within a reasonable time as determined by the County
Engineer and Utility Company, and at the expense of the Utility Company.
H. Hieh Pressure Pipelines
1. All utility Permits for high pressure pipelines (generally 60 PSI or greater), whether pertaining to
controlled access or non -controlled access installations, should contain the following additional
information in the description of the permit.
-diameter
-wall thickness
-material specification
-minimum yield strength
-maximum operation pressure of the pipeline
2. With the exception of the maximum operation pressure of the pipeline, this information is to be supplied
for both the carrier pipe and the casing.
3. Assurance must also be given that the installation material and design meet the minimum Federal Safety
Standards for Liquid and Gas Pipe Lines. Assurance must be provided on company letterhead and signed
by an authorized representative of the company.
4. Petroleum Pipelines:
Depth
Type of Pipeline (below deepest ditch grade) Special Requirements
Encased Pipe Less than 10' Must be covered with concrete pad at least 36" deep
Encased Pipe Greater than 10' No concrete pad required
Non -Cased Pipe Less than 10' Must be covered with concrete pad at least 48" deep
Non -Cased Pipe Greater than 10' No concrete pad required
Concrete pad shall be minimum of 3" thick and width shall be pipe diameter plus 18" minimum
5. Under no circumstances will a pipeline be installed parallel to a County Road within the Right -of -
Way. Transmission lines have been determined to be petroleum pipelines (which includes natural
gas lines) and shall not be parallel to a County Road.
6. Natural Gas Distribution is a line that serves the final customer.
vol. P9.
i
g43
a3.
Le
4.
r -
iaaeei ircriim Yro- I
Y
6
I
IYe rota 1 \ SI
e
TCP (2-10)
WORK SPACE NEAR SHOULDER
Conventional Roads
TCP (2-1b)
WORK SPACE ON SHOULDER
Conventionol Roads
NORK
LEGEND
_ __ .iiM. x emrLpaas _....
.. Ovnel_IZIry,M{c®
M -w o"ini121e
® TlfemnM/Tlmrwl
u•
aM u m oloesl°�p'0�p'�°c'i
IQ
0 Tmfflp Fm
END
y Flwaer
R
40
L•-
W
m5' 335' 315
GAD WORK
160•
Im'
MS• as, Sm' W' 00' 390'
ISS'
f5
50
W
55
TO
L•Y9
EO' 1115' SW'
I
3m'
195'
o5 yy
Fe e
5$' 110•
6T' 680' Tm' 60' Im'
hh �p
650' i15• noe RS' IN
I
T00' n0' \f0' t0' Ifo•i5
1
T50' M.. 900' TS' 150'
i
leen apYlm ncT Oe Tenlpua N. IT fnr Incl m
Ip.
I
M�vMm 1111maBr.pn1 ftpf " eM rNeTm
plmq 1y 3 Bemlmb. ..'N' Ne 11.1, ammo my M
eW . fm 1M 314Ya' W... wl l
S M611I.1 4Wm vMlelm Vlm . w M pMlflmea ptt tlw Tm0
msfea, m101e lroea eOom 1n Iw s 1".1 p Vlbe .vk emm.
I
FYe MIS -111m /WIOV m'4 maIr16N lllypge, mVmsnyaW
LEGEND
_ __ .iiM. x emrLpaas _....
.. Ovnel_IZIry,M{c®
M -w o"ini121e
® TlfemnM/Tlmrwl
i°min0 ems. opera
aM u m oloesl°�p'0�p'�°c'i
J. SIT
0 Tmfflp Fm
Os- nag
y Flwaer
Slme
*
fgmM
YNlye
>pinOle
Ipmf lvNlM
iV.i
Ip / /M
Lm.afm YS Lun Ylnba
pgrp1liN SIT
NVku �("a
TPS TYPa OIMw
ANI/m�e1�Ml
W sem
9•
3G
a
150' 155' IBO'
3E• iN
IN'
w
R
40
L•-
W
m5' 335' 315
35' m•
160•
Im'
MS• as, Sm' W' 00' 390'
ISS'
f5
50
W
55
TO
L•Y9
EO' 1115' SW'
45' 90'
3m'
195'
500' 550• Soo' S0' IN•M
5$' 110•
6T' 680' Tm' 60' Im'
i
650' i15• noe RS' IN
T00' n0' \f0' t0' Ifo•i5
T50' M.. 900' TS' 150'
i
Vql{ Vd1I010
ISap Ibfe [,
p5
iF CTVTfIpr°I Rm6S CYIIY
I
ifiF IeryIN Imp r orf.
fWR
n dm
L•Lm°111 m Tmmpn Ywlaln m wfmfrm s-roe/ea spapaapu
L -L
1
,p91tF
I
srRimm6. liml nYnwm
f�
71
i
GENERAL NOTES
1. nm. mleam m elw. o -p Y9wum.
5u
1 wv
z ul fMris m,Irm enlom Nlvahafm av Plmum. woof Wx
- �
al
•neree elm 1M Mlemle eyabl m ee minm ,Rn ermea In
t
plmR mrpr rtVflm V VaaY lW Wl,eer.
IIn.dital cWnl=d
x s19tlp1Im minim mwle M mmm a mme. m x rpm r/T
i
roo.mr frmelm mi.
f..111 WNmw v1m m I in mm�lm.
TMify 014
I mmo.YSNLm YImNt 1A a 11Y pw16M
amlllmlI W A
i
leen apYlm ncT Oe Tenlpua N. IT fnr Incl m
Ip.
BM ma0 m mgr •Omme rimmt mif a°mina fm
M�vMm 1111maBr.pn1 ftpf " eM rNeTm
plmq 1y 3 Bemlmb. ..'N' Ne 11.1, ammo my M
eW . fm 1M 314Ya' W... wl l
S M611I.1 4Wm vMlelm Vlm . w M pMlflmea ptt tlw Tm0
msfea, m101e lroea eOom 1n Iw s 1".1 p Vlbe .vk emm.
I
FYe MIS -111m /WIOV m'4 maIr16N lllypge, mVmsnyaW
/nm0c
F I
T. M. Nllm.em aYa pllpm!Yw1em pmkd Mo- fm
rWIf Iim •n mf pcnpa T fae ppm5 .1
IN" -+m
M& —
efp eq M wm in plw pl
0. [RAI)
i
.1-m
.1
P018 pss NpID' Alpe fm mwlar ,m9 T aarmllaml meapye.
M
N amelrvef len e' nlnMve <m4/ae1 VNK WoiNl
val�Ole5e0Smn T ru.1e
Ole°i11�.
1
oel 6�°u wJiss
�
Bmrlpebe, nTe am Trema Ilmgltlp
AD
gyp+ Tow D*a hwd a/ TrwepYk m
b' rrorngmrwapnw
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
CONVENTIONAL ROAD
SHOULDER WORK
TCP (2-1c) TCP(2-1)-12
WORK VEHICLES ON SHOULDER
Conventional Roads a °°
TYPICAL USAGE
fWR
SIMt TOm IRIW6DYlf
l°°iflM
,p91tF
gW4Tme
srRimm6. liml nYnwm
smnom9r
f f
i
TCP (2-1c) TCP(2-1)-12
WORK VEHICLES ON SHOULDER
Conventional Roads a °°
19
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
BUDGET AMENDMENT(S) FOR THE 2016-2017 BUDGET YEAR
NO.16/17 52.1-52.4
On this the 26th day of September 2017 at a regular meeting of the Commissioners` Court, the
following members were present:
A. Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding
B. Steve Aldrich, Commissioner, Precinct 1
C. Sammy Catalena, Commissioner, Precinct 2
D. Nancy Berry, Commissioner, Precinct 3
E. Irma Cauley, Commissioner, Precinct 4
F. Karen McQueen, County Clerk
The following proceedings were held:
THAT WHEREAS, on 26th day of September 2017 the Court heard and approved a budget
amendment for the 2016-2017 budget year for Brazos County, Texas; and
WHEREAS, expenditure is necessary due to the necessity to meet unusual and unforeseen conditions
which could not be reasonably included in the original budget adopted 6 September 2016, the following
amendment(s) to the original budget are hereby authorized, as described on the attached page(s).
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this the 26th day of September 2017.
THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.
By:
Duane Peters, County Judge
Original: County Clerk's Office and
Attached to the original budget
Vol. pg. � �
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
BUDGET AMENDMENTS
No. 16117.52.1
et7mo17
FUNDDEPARTMENT
DIVISION CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Incaase Decrease
Gaml Ford 85th District Court
Departmental Support 721.00
Genml Fund 85th District Court
Salary Was" 591.00
General Fund 85thDismct Coun
BaeSu 130.00
ACCT __..
_ _. DRICR
ACCOUNt NAME
Increase Decrease
0100
61900000_
CR
Vision -Court Re omen
721.00
0100
_22000100 _
22000100
_
51630000 i
DR
Hourly Part Time
591.00
0100
22000100
95th District Court
DR
Reallocation of funds to the appropriate accounts or pay
for a sub coon reporeff an ember 11-12,2017.
Department Approval Date 12
nnm'
Date: 9;192011"
Count edge Approval Date
Vol. �--r- Pg.
..._
r+
FUND
DIV
ACCT __..
_ _. DRICR
ACCOUNt NAME
Increase Decrease
0100
61900000_
CR
Vision -Court Re omen
721.00
0100
_22000100 _
22000100
_
51630000 i
DR
Hourly Part Time
591.00
0100
22000100
53100000
DR
Social Securi
45.00
0100
22000100
53200000
DR
Retirement
83.O0
0100
22000100
53800000 1
DR
Workers Comp
2.00
Vol. �--r- Pg.
BRAIOS COUNTY, TEXAS
BUDGET AMENDMENTS
No. 10117.52.2
FUND DEPARTMENT
,ZDSheriHAdminuhatior
Geoml Fund SheriHAdministtation
DIVISION
Jail
Jail
CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase Decrease
Benefits 100000.00
Sal Wa es 100000.00
FUND
DIV
ACCT
DRICR
I ACCOUNT NAME Increase Decrease
0100
18001000
53300000
CR
I Em lovee Health Insurance 100000.00
0100
28002000
516200DO
DR
lHowly - Overtime 100,000.00
li
Sheriff Adminlstratlon - Jail
Reallocation offends to the appropriate accounts to cover farovertime p2yout
for the remainder ofFY 17.
s..
Department Ap.. I Date
nnm
Date: 9'1412017
County Budge Approval Cate
For Account"" Pur
ccs Oak
FUND
DIV
ACCT
DRICR
I ACCOUNT NAME Increase Decrease
0100
18001000
53300000
CR
I Em lovee Health Insurance 100000.00
0100
28002000
516200DO
DR
lHowly - Overtime 100,000.00
VOL �% Py. ��G
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
BUDGET AMENDMENTS
No.16117 - 52.3
FUND DEPARTMENT
DMISION CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase Decrees*
Gmeral Fund Commissioners' Court
Contin enrol Support 13 000.00
General Fund Brame Cm er
Departmental Sumn 13 000.00
FUND I
DIY
ACCT
ORICR
ACCOUNT NAME
I Increase
Decease
0100
1/001500
61130000
CR
Cos en
li000A0
0100
36500100
61880000
DR
Utilities
Commissioners' Court and Brame Center
Reallocation of funds to the appropriate accounts to cover for utilities for the remainder of FY 17.
Dopo tmenl Approval Date
nn
Date: 9;14,201
ounty Judge Approval Date
eenuntiX — na Purposes Onl ti: 5.
FV -0-1.
P$
FUND I
DIY
ACCT
ORICR
ACCOUNT NAME
I Increase
Decease
0100
1/001500
61130000
CR
Cos en
li000A0
0100
36500100
61880000
DR
Utilities
13 000.00
FV -0-1.
P$
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SUDGETAMENDMENTS
No. 16117 -52.4
012612017
FUND DEPARTMENT
DIVISION CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase Decrease
General Fund R & B
Fleet Sh - Hw ui & Maint. 125.00
Genml Fund R&B
FIwSbop-HnvyEguip.Contractual Services 125.00
Decrease
0100
56002000
65050000
CR
-B�ildimt Nlalnt.
125.00
0100
56002000
71512000
DR
Rental . Uniforms
-; 125.00
R&B - Fleet Shop - Heavy Equipment
Reallmfion of funds to the appropriate accounts to cover for =M1 uniforms.
Department Approval Date
nim
Date: 9'2012017
9 a� rte.
County Judge Approval Date
FUND
DIV
ACCT
DRICR
ACCOUNT NAME
:_ Increase
Decrease
0100
56002000
65050000
CR
-B�ildimt Nlalnt.
125.00
0100
56002000
71512000
DR
Rental . Uniforms
-; 125.00
PERSONNEL
CHANGE OF STATUS REQUESTS
Commissioner Court Date: September 26, 2017
Department Submitting Information: Human Resources
Purpose of Submissions: Consider and Take Action on Change Requests
Department Submitting Employee Request Action Requested
Request(s) Applies To
Brazos Center
Pistler, Jodi L.
Change of Status
Constable, Precinct 2 McDermott, Christopher Employment
McDermott, Christopher Change of Status
Piccolo Jr., Tony Employment
Fleet Services Carroll, Shelvin Separation
Juvenile Services — Detention Vega, Perla B. Change of Status
Zuniga, Irma Separation
Road & Bridge Martinez, Christopher Employment
Munger, Robert A. Separation
Sheriffs Office— Detention Hawkins, I'Terrika D.
Kirk, Robert C.
Approved in Commissioners' Court: Se teml 2077
County Judge's or Commissioner's Signature:
(This Copy to be attached to minutes)
Vol. pq %Z 1�
Change of Status
Change of Status
PERSONNEL
CHANGE OF STATUS REQUESTS
Commissioner Court Date: September 26, 2017
Department Submitting Information: Human Resources
Purpose of Submissions: Consider and Take Action on Change Requests
Department Submitting Employee Request Action Requested
Request(s) Applies To
272nd District Court Montoya, Ernest J. Change of Status
Parker, Lisa L. Change of Status
Rodriguez, Connie Change of Status
Constable, Precinct 4
Butler Jr., Isaac
Harris, Kimberly
Licon, Victor
Reyes, Melissa
Smith, Glenda
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
County Clerk Baker, Debbie
Change of Status
Barcelona, Cathy
Change of Status
Cohen, Susie
Change of Status
Davenport, Winstonia
Change of Status
Garcia, Mary
Change of Status
Green, Kim
Change of Status
McQueen, Karen
Change of Status
Moehlman, Amber
Change of Status
Montalbano, Patsy
Change of Status
Ocon, Rebecca
Change of Status
Oliver, Michele
Change of Status
Peters -Bowman, Ashlie
Change of Status
Ramirez, Teresa
Change of Status
Taplin, Pauline
Change of Status
Waskow, Debbie
Change of Status
Workman, Flo
Change of Status
Vol. Pg. �� d
1
County Judge Gott, Myra Change of Status
Elections Administration Alston, Patricia R.
Separation
Alston, Patricia R.
Employment
Elliott, Victoria
Change of Status
Hancock, Trudy
Change of Status
Ocon, Krystal
Change of Status
Schuetze, Kathy
Change of Status
Tijerina, Norma
Change of Status
Velasquez, Paul
Change of Status
White, Regina
Change of Status
Exposition Complex Cammack, Lonnie
Change of Status
Chappel, Donny
Change of Status
Kolbe, Clarence Carl
Change of Status
Daily, Abraham
Change of Status
Jackson, Angelia A.
Change of Status
Lambert, Joshua M.
Change of Status
Monarres, Gerardo
Change of Status
Fleet Services
Heavy Fleet
Human Resources
Chadwick, Ken
Luther, Greg
Phallan, Shawn D.
Flores, Antonia
Garica, Deyanira
Mendez, Mary
Salazar, Jennifer
Sauseda, Monica
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
Juvenile — Academy Galls, Gregory Change of Status
2
Vol, -'2-
Juvenile - Administration Hein, Joel
Change of Status
Hendricks, LaTonya
Change of Status
Johnson, Christena
Change of Status
Kasberg, Stacey
Change of Status
McDaniel, Demetris
Change of Status
Magyar, Melissa
Change of Status
Mendiola-Washington, Guadalupe
Change of Status
Piccolo, Barbara
Change of Status
Roberts, Bobbie
Change of Status
Taylor, Jannifer
Change of Status
White, Melissa
Change of Status
Wood, J G
Change of Status
Vance, Charles D.
Change of Status
Juvenile - Detention
Bass, Darius
Change of Status
Burns, Pamela J.
Change of Status
Coffey, Christopher
Change of Status
Gooden, Shatner
Change of Status
Mable-Bazy, Kami
Change of Status
Taylor, Sarai
Change of Status
Juvenile - JJAEP
Farris, Kari
Change of Status
Truelove, Sharla
Change of Status
Juvenile - State Aid
Brown, Dexter
Change of Status
Gray, Cornelius
Change of Status
Norrid, Jeanie
Change of Status
Juvenile - TYC Parole
Calzada-Sanchez, Sandra
Change of Status
Kuder, Nancy Jo
Change of Status
Road & Bridge Alvarado, Manuel Change of Status
Arnold, Gary Change of Status
3
Vol, ��! _- Pg•-�,--�-
Arredondo, Guadalupe
Change of Status
Bass, Anthony
Change of Status
Curtis, Alfred
Change of Status
Eldridge, Shawn
Change of Status
Greer, Kenny
Change of Status
Grisso, Johnathon
Change of Status
Hinton, Kimberlyn
Change of Status
Jones, Jon
Change of Status
Kolwes, Darrell
Change of Status
Lott, Megan
Change of Status
Matejka, Steven
Change of Status
Meadors, Ronnie
Change of Status
Reyna, Pedro
Change of Status
Talley, John
Change of Status
Telg, Darwin D.
Separation
Telg, Darwin D.
Employment
Telg, Darwin D.
Change of Status
Tyler, Karen
Change of Status
Villalpando, Roland
Change of Status
Villeda, Gregorio
Change of Status
Wade, Steven
Change of Status
White, Kenneth
Change of Status
Wilhelm, Wayne
Change of Status
Woods, Bobby
Change of Status
Sheriffs Office —Administration Hernandez, Salomon
Change of Status
Kirk, Christopher
Change of Status
Wilcox, David
Change of Status
Sheriffs Office — Commissary Townsend, Christopher
Change of Status
Sheriffs Office — Detention Alford, Christian
Allen, Michael
Arjon, Jesse
Vol. Pg.�J7�
Change of Status
Change of Status
Change of Status
4
Barratt, Jerry
Change of Status
Bartolomei, Anna -Marie
Change of Status
Belangeri, Abigail
Change of Status
Bennatt, James
Change of Status
Blasienz, Andrew
Change of Status
Booker, Daryl
Change of Status
Boone, Brian
Change of Status
Bowser, Melvin
Change of Status
Boxley, Ahnjayla
Change of Status
Bradley, Lawonder
Change of Status
Brinson, Dustin
Change of Status
Brown, Christopher
Change of Status
Brune, Karl
Change of Status
Bustos-Lozano, Juan
Change of Status
Butler, Patricia
Change of Status
Calhoun, Michael
Change of Status
Camper, Aaron
Change of Status
Castro, Joel
Change of Status
Chambers, Doug
Change of Status
Charles, Jarred A.
Change of Status
Conover, Ryan
Change of Status
Contreras, Joseluis
Change of Status
Cook, Laura
Change of Status
Currie, Michael
Change of Status
Daily, Bethany
Change of Status
Day, Michael
Change of Status
DeJesus, Servando
Change of Status
Dicky, Wayne
Change of Status
Donaldson, Dillon
Change of Status
Dozier, Kelly
Change of Status
Ellsworth, Tucker
Change of Status
Felder, LaTonya
Change of Status
Felix -Rodriguez, Monica
Change of Status
Figueroa, Jose
Change of Status
G
Vol. Pg.
Frodge, Celia
Change of Status
Gibbs, Myrtle
Change of Status
Grawl, Edward
Change of Status
Greiner, Christopher
Change of Status
Gunn, Zachary
Change of Status
Hamilton, Tracy
Change of Status
Harrison, William
Change of Status
Harvey, Terri
Change of Status
Henley, Damon
Change of Status
Henry, Clarence
Change of Status
Hernandez, Joshua
Change of Status
Hinton, Blake
Change of Status
Hodge, Melrita
Change of Status
Ivey, Zachary
Change of Status
Jackson, Adrian
Change of Status
Jackson, Belinda
Change of Status
James, Robert
Change of Status
Jones, Charles V.
Change of Status
Jurk, Elizabeth
Change of Status
Kmiec, Kennan
Change of Status
Ledyard, Holt
Change of Status
Lyle, Sidney
Change of Status
McClure, William
Change of Status
Marinari, Justin
Change of Status
Matott, Michael
Change of Status
Miles, An'Tanisha
Change of Status
Mitchell, James
Change of Status
Moore, Wayne
Change of Status
Nance, Ricky
Change of Status
Neveu, Albert
Change of Status
O'Brien, Austin
Change of Status
Osburn, Macy
Change of Status
Pace, Lonnie
Change of Status
Pena, Corando
Change of Status
3
P9.
Plagens, Daryl
Change of Status
Preston, Mary
Change of Status
Reyes, Daniel
Change of Status
Riordan, Marc
Change of Status
Rodriguez, Javier
Change of Status
Roop, Amanda
Change of Status
Rosser, Carolyn
Change of Status
Sanders, Richard
Change of Status
Schmidt, Jeremiah
Change of Status
Schott, Michael R.
Change of Status
Scott, Jeff
Change of Status
Seegers, Robert
Change of Status
Shannon, Tammy
Change of Status
Silva, Daniel
Change of Status
Slang, Sandra
Change of Status
Smith, Sheldon
Change of Status
Sparks, Telecia
Change of Status
Stuart, Kevin
Change of Status
Stubblefield, Nicholas
Change of Status
Sullivan, Carl
Change of Status
Sweatt, Robert
Change of Status
Thomas, Elizabeth
Change of Status
Thomas, Mary Ann
Change of Status
Tomas, Cynthia
Change of Status
Vaughn, Christopher
Change of Status
Velasquez, Dennis
Change of Status
Walker, Reginald
Change of Status
Waller, Courtney
Change of Status
Walley, Catherine
Change of Status
Weichert, Jonathon
Change of Status
Williams, DeElla
Change of Status
Wilson, Kenneth
Change of Status
Winn, Jim
Change of Status
Wooley, Wanda
Change of Status
7
Y
Ui _C s7, P, .3>G
Sheriffs Office— Jail Medical Coleman, Kyle L.
Change of Status
Croucher, Rebecca L.
Change of Status
Hail, Glenda S.
Change of Status
Hudson, Lane C.
Change of Status
McGovern, Ronald
Change of Status
Mobley, Mathew E.
Change of Status
Wright, Kathryn
Change of Status
Ziegelmann, Michelle
Change of Status
Tax Office Alejandro, Jodi
Change of Status
Barrington, Jeanette M.
Change of Status
Bevers, Thomas A.
Change of Status
Brunson, Kristina
Change of Status
Chavez-Valdovinos, Berenice
Change of Status
Emerson, Laura J.
Change of Status
French, Connie M.
Change of Status
Golson, Patricia
Change of Status
Harris, Sireesha T.
Change of Status
Hartman, Victoria L.
Change of Status
Hines, Angela
Change of Status
Hitchcock, Karlis R.
Change of Status
Johnson, Linda
Change of Status
Leonard, Melissa
Change of Status
Lopez, Ana Arriola
Change of Status
McAdam, Niki
Change of Status
Mauricio, Veronica
Change of Status
Mejias, Michelle R.
Change of Status
Moncivais, Cindy
Change of Status
Moore, Tommie
Change of Status
Oglesby, Stacie
Change of Status
Ontiveros, Devin
Change of Status
Radke, Tracy
Change of Status
Rios, Desiree
Change of Status
Vol. 5 9 Pg. 1�7
Rivera -Palma, Vanesa
Change of Status
Robles, Josephina
Change of Status
Rodriguez, Maria
Change of Status
Roe, Dorye K.
Change of Status
Smith, Shelley R.
Change of Status
Taplin-Sweed, Yolanda
Change of Status
Taylor, Reta M.
Separation
Taylor, Reta M.
Employment
Westbrook, Roger
Change of Status
Williams, Jakeith
Change of Status
Williams, Lequnia
Change of Status
Williamson, Pamela Sue
Change of Status
Approved in Commissioners' Court: Set be 6 201
County Judge's or Commissioner's Signature:
�3L��21t_���
(This Copy to be attached to minutes)
9
i
i