Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-02-28 10:00AM REGULAR MEETINGBRAZOS COUNTY BRYAN,TEXAS rl�rr A11:31 NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY WILL MEET IN REGULAR SESSION ON FEBRUARY 28, 2017 AT 10:00 AM IN THE COMMISSIONERS COURTROOM OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 200 SOUTH TEXAS AVE., SUITE 106, BRYAN, TX 77803 Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance - U.S. and Texas Flag - Chaplain G.H. Jones and Commissioner Catalena 2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns 3. Presentations and/or Discussions Presentation by Rebecca Dudensing for the results of the FY2016 Economic Impact Analysis for the Brazos County Exposition Complex. Consider and take action on agenda items 4-16: 4. Resolution 17-005 authorizing the submission of a grant application for Crimes Against Women Unit by the Brazos County District Attorney's Office. 5. Request from the Information Technology Department for out-of-state travel for Eric Caldwell to attend the Knowledge 17 ServiceNow training conference in Orlando, Florida. Dates of travel are May 7-11, 2017. 6. Request from Emergency Management for out-of-state travel for Michele Meade and Jason Ware to attend the National Hurricane Conference from April 17-20, 2017 in New Orleans, Louisiana. 7. Approval of Donated/Awarded Inmate Property forms dated 2017-0219 8. Approval of the Brazos County Subdivision Regulations' attached Fees (for various services) effective as of March 1, 2017. 9. Payment Authorization to Texcon General Contractors in the amount of 9,443.94 for 1" washed limestone; Purchase Order #17000622 was obtained in advance; however, Fv- _7-�p g.�'"_ additional material was ordered without requesting a change order. 10. Payment Authorization to Hart intercivic in the amount of $1452.00 for annual software license & support; a purchase order was not obtained in advance. 11. Consider and take action on an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) between Brazos County and the College Station Independent School District. 12. Order 17-001 declaring the funding of the School Resource Deputy positions and fringe benefits per the Interlocal Agreement between Brazos County and the College Station Independent School District an emergency expenditure as an amendment to the original budget per Section 111.70 of the Local Government Code effective March 1, 2017. 13. Request from Road and Bridge for approval and payment of a claim in an amount not to exceed $5,800.00 for driveway damage on Anasazi Bluff/Indian Lakes Subdivision. Site is located in Precinct 1. 14. Budget Amendments. Budget Amendments FY 16/17 22.1 - 22.7 15. Personnel Change of Status. Personnel Action Forms 16. Payment of Claims. 17. Acknowledgement of Road and Bridge Maintenance Expenditures Report (FY17) from 10/01/2016 through 12/31/2016. 18. Sheriffs report on inmate population. 19. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics. 20. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns 21. Adjourn. ell Vol. Pg. � PUBLIC COMMENTS Public Comment during the Commission Meeting may be for all matters, both on and off the agenda, and be limited to four minutes per person. Persons are invited to submit comments in writing on the agenda items and/or attend and make comment at the Commission meeting. Members of the public are reminded that the Brazos County Commissioners Court is a Constitutional Court, with both judicial and legislative powers, created under Article V, Section 1 and Section 18 of the Texas Constitution. As a Constitutional Court, the Brams County Commissioners Court also possesses the power to issue a Contempt of Court Citation under Section 81.024 of the Texas Loral Government Code. Accordingly, members of the public in attendance at any Regular, Special and/or Emergency meeting of the Court shall conduct themselves with proper respect and decorum in speaking to, and/or addressing the Court; In participating in public discussions before the Court; and in all actions in the presence of the Court. Those members of the public who are inappropriately attired and/or who do not conduct themselves in an orderly and appropriate manner vdll be ordered to leave the meeting. Refusal to abide by the Court's Order and/or continued disruption of the meeting may result in a Contempt of Court Citation. It is not the intention of the Brams County Commissioners Court to provide a public forum for the demeaning of any individual or group. Neither is it the intention of the Court to allow a member (or members) of the public to insult the honesty and/or integrity of the Court, as a body, or any member or members of the Court, or County employees, individually or collectively. Accordingly, profane, insulting or threatening language directed toward the Court and/or any person in the Court's presence and/or racial, ethnic or gender slurs or epithets will not be tolerated. Violation of these rules may result in the following sanctions: 1. cancellation of a speaker's time; 2. removal from the Commissioners Court; 3. a Contempt Citation; and/or 4. such other and/or criminal sanctions as may be authorized under the Constitution, Statutes and Codes of the State of Texas. The County Commissioners Court can deliberate or take action only if a matter has been listed on an agenda properly posted prior to the meeting. During the public comment period, speakers may address matters not listed on the published agenda. The Open Meeting Law does not expressly prohibit responses to public comments by the Commissioners Court. Fbvsver, responses from the County Judge or Commissioners to unlisted public comment topics could become deliberation on a matter without notice to the public. To ensure the public has notice of all matters the Commissioners Court will consider, the County Judge and/or Commissioners may choose not to respond to public comments, except to correct factual inaccuracies, recite existing policy in response to an inquiry or to ask that a matter be listed on a future agenda. See Texas Open Meetings Act Section 551.042. INVOCATION Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Court meeting shall be to and for the benefit of the Court. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Court and do not necessarily represent the religious beliefs or views of the Court in part or as a whole. No member of the community is required to attend or participate in the invocation and such decision will have no impact on their right to actively participate in the business of the Court. The Commissioners Courtroom of the County Adninistration Building, 200 South Texas Ave., Suite 106, Bryan, TX 77803 is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made two working days before the meeting. To make arrangements, please call (979) 361-4102. Vol. . 11�76 pg. FEBRUARY 28, 2017 BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT REGULAR MEETING A regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court of Brazos County, Texas was held in the Brazos County Commissioners Courtroom in the Administration Building, 200 South Texas Avenue, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas, beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, February 28, 2017 with the following members of the Court present: Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding; Steve Aldrich, Commissioner of Precinct 1; Sammy Catalena, Commissioner of Precinct 2; Nancy Berry, Commissioner of Precinct 3; Irma Cauley, Commissioner of Precinct 4; Karen McQueen, County Clerk. The attached sheets contain the names of the citizens and officials that were in attendance. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance - U.S. and Texas Flag - Chaplain G.H. Jones and Commissioner Catalena 2. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns There was no citizen's input. 3. Presentations and/or Discussions Presentation by Rebecca Dudensing for the results of the FY2016 Economic Impact Analysis for the Brazos County Exposition Complex. Brazos County Expo Complex Director Tom Quarles introduced Dr. Rebekka Dudensing. Dr. Dudensing reported a total of $7,630,100 economic impact to the community along with 77.9 jobs added. Mr. Quarles stated he expects to grow each year and that an impact study should be conducted each year. Commissioner Aldrich asked about direct hotel occupancy tax and if Dr. Dudensing could add that to future reports. Dr. Dudensing stated she could include that in the future reports. She also said that there were 11,200 nights of local lodging and 1.47 million in lodging with 7% collected as county hotel tax. Commissoner Aldrich asked if they used the Industry Standard Calculator by the Convention and Visitors Bureau. Dr. Dudensing said that type of calculator does not cover the same type of events that are hosted at the Expo. Commissioner Aldrich also asked if there was a comparison between other facilities and the Brazos County Expo. Mr. Quarles said that the Expo business model is to be the best in the business. He went on to say it is hard to compare to other facilities because they all operate differently depending upon the size of the city, types of events and lodging accommodations. He said that the Brazos County Expo has a reward program but horse and livestock shows are different than conferences. The people who attend a horse or livestock show look for their own rooms and do not typically reserve from a block of rooms. Mr. Quarles also stated that hotel rates are a limiting factor, especially during football season, graduation ceremonies, parents weekend, etc. taking place at Texas ABM University. Commissioner Aldrich commented that he has been impressed by the organization and cleanliness of the facility at the many events he has attended at the Expo. He thanked Mr. Quarles for all his hard work. A copy of the Brazos County Exposition Complex FY 2016 Economic Impact Analysis is attached. Consider and take action on agenda items 4-16: 4. Resolution 17-005 authorizing the submission of a grant application for Crimes Against Women Unit by the Brazos County District Attorney's Office. The Court voted unanimously to approve the submission of the grant application for the Crimes Against Women Unit to the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division. A copy of the resolution is attached. Vol. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Irma Cauley. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. Request from the Information Technology Department for out-of-state travel for Eric Caldwell to attend the Knowledge 17 ServiceNow training conference in Orlando, Florida. Dates of travel are May 7-11, 2017. Motion:, Moved by Commissioner Irma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. Request from Emergency Management for out-of-state travel for Michele Meade and Jason Ware to attend the National Hurricane Conference from April 17-20, 2017 in New Orleans, Louisiana. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Irma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. Approval of Donated/Awarded Inmate Property forms dated 2017-0219 Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner I rma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. Approval of the Brazos County Subdivision Regulations' attached Fees (for various services) effective as of March 1, 2017. Commissioner Aldrich noted that a correction of $25.00 should be added under "Other' - Junk/Auto-Salvage/Wrecking Yard Permit to the January 1 ,2018 column. A motion was made by Commissioner Catalena to approve the Brazos County Subdivision Regulation Fees with the added correction. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cauley and passed unanimously. A copy of the services and fees is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by Commissioner Irma Cauley. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. Payment Authorization to Texcon General Contractors in the amount of 9,443.94 for 1" washed limestone; Purchase Order #17000622 was obtained in advance; however, additional material was ordered without requesting a change order. This payment authorization was requested by the Road and Bridge Department. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by Vol. pg., 76 Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 10. Payment Authorization to Hart Intercivic in the amount of $1452.00 for annual software license & support; a purchase order was not obtained in advance. This payment authorization was requested by the Elections Administrator. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 11. Consider and take action on an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) between Brazos County and the College Station Independent School District. Commissioner Cauley questioned what portion Brazos County is paying after the agreement is signed. Judge Peters explained that College Station Independent School District will be reimbursing atone hundred (100) percent. Commissioner Catalena said that they will be monitoring it closely so that Brazos County is not out any money. A copy of the agreement is attached Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 12. Order 17-001 declaring the funding of the School Resource Deputy positions and fringe benefits per the Interlocal Agreement between Brazos County and the College Station Independent School District an emergency expenditure as an amendment to the original budget per Section 111.70 of the Local Government Code effective March 1, 2017. Judge Peters stated that this is the method for funding resource officers since it was not considered at the Budget Meeting. Bill Ballard explained to the Court the events leading up to this point and the conditions for amending the budget. Mr. Ballard went on to explain the law and how this fits the rare circumstance definition. Mr. Ballard stated he believes the Court is justified in considering this motion. A copy of the order is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Nancy Berry, Seconded by Commissioner Steve Aldrich. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 13. Request from Road and Bridge for approval and payment of a claim in an amount not to exceed $5,800.00 for driveway damage on Anasazi Bluff/Indian Lakes Subdivision. Site is located in Precinct 1. Vol. I �I L. . Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Steve Aldrich, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 14. Budget Amendments. Budget Amendments FY 16/17 22.1 - 22.7 22.1 Reallocate funds for Juvenile Services. 22.2 Transfer funds from Non -Departmental to Exposition Complex. 22.3 Transfer funds from Non -Departmental to Information Technology. 22.4 Transfer funds from Non -Departmental to Capital Projects and Information Technology. 22.5 To appropriately record and recognize a donation of land that was not completed in Fiscal Year 2016. 22.6 Transfer funds from Non -Departmental to Information Technology. 22.7 Transfer funds from Contingency Fund to Non -Departmental. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Irma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 15. Personnel Change of Status. Personnel Action Forms A copy of the Personnel Change of Status requests is attached. Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Irma Cauley, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 16. Payment of Claims. Claims 7153119-7153316 Motion: Approve, Moved by Commissioner Sammy Catalena, Seconded by Commissioner Nancy Berry. Passed. 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 17. Acknowledgement of Road and Bridge Maintenance Expenditures Report (FY17) from 10/01/2016 through 12/31/2016. The Court acknowledged receipt of of the FY 2017 Road and Bridge Maintenance Expenditures Report from 10/01/2016 through 12/31/2016. 18. Sheriffs report on inmate population. Wayne Dicky, Jail Administrator stated there were 616 inmates in jail, 543 inmates are male and 73 are female, 52 have electronic monitors and 23 are pending for monitors. Vol. S? __ Pg. 19. Announcement of interest items and possible future agenda topics. Commissioner Berry said that she has been working on the strategic plan and has some outlines of plans that may be of some interest to the Court. 20. Call for Citizen input and/or concerns Chief Deputy, Jim Stewart thanked the Court for their support while working on the Interlocal Agreement with College Station ISD to provide school resource officers. He also thanked the following for their input: Bill Ballard, Katie Conner, Charles Wendt and Irene Jett. Chief Stewart introduced the following deputies to the Court: Sean McCarroll, Garrett House, and Jacob Yarter. Deputy Yarter will be supervising the school resource officers. Motion: , Moved by, Seconded by. . 5-0. Ayes: Aldrich, Berry, Catalena, Cauley, Peters. 21. Adjourn. vol. pg. %J The foregoing minutes of the Commissioners Court meeting held February 28, 2017 have been examined and are approved in open Court this 101 day of Ma rck , 2017, in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas. Duane Peters County Judge Irma Cauley L� Commissioner, Precinct 4 Attest: Steve Aldrich Commissioner, Precinct 1 Nancy Berry Commissioner, Precinct 3 County Clerk vol. pg. _%� Name (PLEASE PRINT) BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT DAY OF F 6,-a&t.y , 20 17 . cook AM/, Organization (PLEASE PRINT) n. Pg / of S- /3GSJ �C. J 1S o 446 &'J6 C 11,7i5n 6�k� BRAZOSCOUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT Name (PLEASE PRINT) 1) f) A(Z Imp [.alis Organization (PLEASE PRINT) �7'r rdcli>c° �L� CJs 62, 5 P9 Au 13 Vol Pg.�' /' IME Ilk O Lfi �--L:fY N N Mi ri NLf) M ( 110 M (N r -I L1 Lf)r-�] MI � Mt M O N: I� I Ln I I L _� Lrnl 00 Ln, T m O' M N I r -I I I I I O! O ..0 N Y U 0 N J 0 N l0 [Lr), o0 Y N �__Oo N, Lf) 00 Itt O �O I ch j, 011 00 -ii I i r M i r -i 4* t I I R*-rn ch w ;' "ko Ln o0 Ol N O r.4:: V4 to R1 M 00I ri O N ; N (D r�4cn (0r -I' M I i rH I I , lfl -�o l O oo I N cn-t N FLn r -I PD- I i ! I O� 1 _J r i I L_ -J `I t J .N h .:.__II ^ -^ -i -Il .r -I !✓ I ri " I ry t t I I I U_ tl N , fB Vf I U L '^ fII : Q) N•V Lu I I LL I, v C: O -C vi on O > Lu %I a� O �I `L L V) C: 4Z w : I ,• 3 3� v v M) u41 -op �, 4-a O �I �, O t 'tel Q p. U H W I_n , J I F FVot 2&_571— po- < 0) \ \» E � 0 .v o o R R % \ _ 4-1 k % CU \ - \ $ ® d E ƒ % $ 0) � -C_ \ 2 D 0 ■ w »� W U U O S O 2 2 2 O O c O � Vol. � �.7y \ \» .v O - c » 0 ■ w »� � : � � Vol. � �.7y a L %i YY .pE M N M It U') (0 K t $ 9 --� L- It- r r r r C) C) CD CD C) C) >1 N N N N N M ® ■ ® m ® 0 %i YY .pE we may"' n 4 3 K t $ 9 --� x XP \ 4 • • _ _ • _ • h e VolPg. �� 0 \\\` \\\/� ` ���� � � \�\ � 2%./ . . .�`/ \\^\�� �§<\ \� � � \, ?� 2�2� ®� ^� � \�� /�. \ � ..������\:����\�} \ \� » . .� � \� <y «< � � � � � � � \ . %� Z� �0� i U O s� .U) O Q _O cn i DU) O C: cnC O cn o � � w � i � lV � �O 0.70 O O Q,.!Z II II Q C: 70V '0 O C -0[O��] � © C:V / C r� O IA OO U W U) _(D m U) 0. 0 co U) L O Q O L O E O a) E .e 4- 70 LL 4-0 O E _O E ui Va. x,57 Pg. _ �1 0 U) Z D U) 00 00 00 qt ma O N N (D Q N N O O O O ® E O ti � N ® com CN m qt m LN Nt Ir -I 619- co CD 0 CD CD O O O O m O O O � ti co co 00 T- r N 64 6c)- 6c> O O O O �r O O O O (D C'7 CA I` rwL ti 00 N C)O I` C17 co q� ® N R� C +- +- +J 4-0EL) N -0 Co in W .S� W .S W - w INDIA 1 Ch m LO CF) O r- M ® r' O O O CD ® E ® m N V) LO O O co m N m m � O .� O O O Co LO O M- CL O I` N O (D 00 I` CO O to Ug 61)- 1)-0 CL 4-0 � U � E tt-. 7;5 tt.- Vol. .3�� ?g. _ ,�✓� V rU U) O ti M (c) Ja O N Cc) Q N N n O CD 0 CD It O UD 00 N r O Nt- r- O r N — LO r r P.-- O O O O O O O C) LO ti O M r r N Ln r 69- 6F} r ff� 69} O O O O •�+ O O O O tt r O Iq N O dr N r LO Cc) m r M M 00 ® ' bg 1 V r.LU +� 0 +� E U 4-0+� �� --o ®WE W lel w Vol. SG Pg. IN AN INS U J (n N ti O (D ma 4 O O 6 O n Lm (D O O O O O E N O �- M O O UD N 00 N LO r 69- 69- T- O O O O O CN CY) NO � a� ti it Iq UD O O O O � 00 O� � T-7 M O Ln N 00 00 00 {f} b9} LO V ._ O ®W S W S W W U) r N C`7 O ma r o6 C6 I` ® (D n OO C) 00 OO O E O M r r � LO O 0 O CO CD O O O O Co r co UD C6 � co co� UD UD 07 i � � � ff- A.+ O O O O 0 N O M lir- COL COL C'7 L r O �•+ ti C'7 N M LO O O C4 ® L r r ff} Ef} 6F} ff� 0 F- N N N ® W W E WFo- W Vof. SZ� Pg. �5' Is Boa. — 1 G�._ Pg. r�� (N Ln O) (O 00 O O 0) o r --- C) 0 0 O co O O O ® E �- ® m m UD 000 IN co 6q co 09- ® Eft e9- O O O O O CD CD � O N co 000 CO O co co N i M eq. Ln o O�I O O _ o qqt V � CL ti M N M }' (` M N M t` M M d" ® c0 r rn b9 ff} 60— AMA c.i4-0 3 a) cu N 0W .S�w ELTJI- w Boa. — 1 G�._ Pg. r�� 10 0 v- N M O ma r M M ti O CD O O 0 O O LM 0 00 O E 07 co � ®M O UD O O r o co N O O O O O O co (D UD 70 � ti 0 CIO UD UD (M Q N M O O O O O O O O N CO M r M Lei r O }' f` M N M UD O O (C) O 6q U E Fm N W w W W 0 F- F ol.�� Pg. --Z_ a INS, Vol. __ Pg. �� O O O N CL3 000. CN UD w ti o CD 0 0 0 0 M d7 N M CO N T- v- I,-- M to O L U (6 ti L M LO to o O O o N N N IN Vol. __ Pg. �� r �1 O .E LO ti W, u w U N 0 U E ■❑ C O .E N 70 N c O E CO N I I N O C .Q co J w �w z z LU Fm Col. �2_ Pg. 7u_ OD cm V ME J Vol. — Pg O O O LM O O O ® E O r O I` ® � 60- 6q 60- O C O Q O O O O O O ,0 M C. O M M I` �+ N 6F-} 6F} N O 4-0 EF- N111-5 N a) co a) 0 W .S� W E W - W Vol. — Pg Lin d 0 M (Y) CY) 00 no N O O N G� O O O O o E UD C4 m m UD m m® Il- 6c> 64> co 69- 9-O CD O O O CD CD CD Cfl O { « 601-O O O O O �+ O O O O O r N N c'7 C( T- Ef} N ® bg 6cy V M CL U �, +� U +J +a •—�� p ®W-LVJ-WE-W Vol. �� _ Pg. EL- 0 U CG D (1) 00 N N M Ja T� O O N n L O O O E O 0 00 I` f` N ® m co co co {f} 60!) -LO O O O O LO ti Iq UD L6 � O 00 O O O O .�+ OO O O T- LO N 00 cr O O6 I` � Cfl N N N V 4-0 � U +� �...• U 4-0 4-j���' 2 N m N .e in W ® W .S w � LTJ Vol. Economic Impact of the Brazos County Expo Complex Fiscal Year 2016 Rebekka Dudensing, PhD February 2017 Vol. a5y pg. - 7 7 TE7cAs A&M LGRILIFE EXTENSION Expo Events The Brazos County Expo hosted 176 events over 322 days in Fiscal Year 2016, compared with 159 events over 305 days in FY2015. Annual attendance was estimated at 92,216, up from 72,405 in FY2015. Additionally, the Brazos Valley Fair hosted 16,000 participants and attendees, bringing facility attendance to 108,216. Person -days totaled 147,971 in FY2016 as compared to 132,084 last year. Person -days totaled 163,971 including the fair. Table 1 shows the number of events, event days, attendance, and person -days by event type. Table 1. Expo events by type, event count, days, attendance and bill, FY 2016. Type Count Type Count Type Days Type Attendees Type person - Days Florse Shows 20 65 7,335 25,120 Livestock Shows 13 38 5,075 16,225 Do* Shows 3 5 235 395 Rodeos, Ropings, and Barrel Races 17 48 12,050 31,360 Misc. Spectator Event 9 14 10,020 10,720 Conferences and Career Fairs 10 16 6,654 8,654 Trade Shows 14 26 12,485 14,885 Meetings, Seminars, and Educational Events 1 17 30 4,394 6,244 Private Events 71 78 33,848 34,248 Local Service 2 2 120 120 Tota[ w/o Fair 176 322 92,216 147,971 Fair 1 3 16,000 16,000 Total w Fair 177 325 108,216 163,971 The table above includes partnership events. Partnership events held at the Expo likely would have been held in Brazos County even if the Expo did not exist. Partnerships reflect the availability of the Expo for local events such as the fundraisers, weddings, meetings, educational events, and corporate parties. These partnership events are not included in the analysis of spending and economic impacts although they provide an important service to local residents and businesses. Local service events include services for county residents, including health screening and livestock validation. Again, there is no visitor impact, but the services are important to local residents. Revenue -generation is a priority for Expo management and staff, but Expo visitors generate more economic activity in Brazos County outside the complex than within it. Crompton and Culpepper note that publically owned facilities are often important palls of the economy because they attract visitors and non -local spending.2 Indeed, such facilities are often built with a goal of garnering such outside spending as well as providing a venue for local events and fostering pride in the community through hosting a variety of events. The spending component of the facility's purpose suggests the appropriateness of an economic impact study. Vol. `z — P9• 5�� While attendance counts people, people attended. For example, a Quarter horse show with 500 attendees competing over four days would result in in 2,000 person -days. However, a career fair with 200 non -local vendors who attended two days (400 person days) and 550 attendees spread over three days would result in 950 person -days. 2 Crompton, John, and Juddson Culpepper. 2006. The Economic Contribution of "Texas State Parks in FY 2006. Texas A&M University, Department of Recreation, Parks, and 'Tourism Sciences, College Station, TX, December. Visitor Spending by Event Category Expo staff survey event participants throughout the year to determine how much they are spending at hotels, restaurants, etc. Each event, and each individual participant, has a different expenditure pattern, although similar types of events tend to produce similar spending patterns. A different sample of events is surveyed each year in order to capture the spending patterns of a broad array of events. In addition to 2016 spending, an inflation- adjusted three -year -average of spending is used to improve the reliability of expenditure data as the survey captures these different events. Only responses from visitors to the county are used to calculate spending impacts, and only the non -local portion of event participants is included in the economic analysis. Spending averages are weighted by person -days for each of the surveyed events in each event category. The 2014-2016 average and the 2016 calculation are presented in Tables 2 and 3 to provide a range of expenditures and impacts. Only the three -year -average is discussed in the text. Overall spending in 2016 was higher relative to the three-year average of $5.6 million, although spending was lower in 2016 for the trade shows and rodeos after accounting for non -local access fees. Horse show and conference/career fair spending were up sharply in 2016. Again, this variation is largely a function of events surveyed from year to year and highlights the importance of focusing on the average spending, which includes a broader and thus more representative range of spending patterns. Table 2. 2014-2016 Non -local Person -Day Expenditures by Event Category. Table 3. 2016 Non -local Person -Day Expenditures by Event Category. Event Type ]Lodging Food Gas Retail Recreation Access Other Total Horse Shows $588,902 $370,632 $205,056 $167,109 $12,072 $333,177 $80,638 $1,757,587 Livestock Shows $361,697 $198,515 $122,146 $68,338 $14,583 $98,356 $36,951 $900,586 Dog Shows $7,754 $3,964 $5,663 $2,658 $18 $0 $43 $20,100 Rodeos $303,973 $338,323 $286,956 $117,350 $35,096 $908,532 $122,216 $2,112,447 Spectator Events $48,491 $53,971 $45,776 $18,720 $5,599 $0 $19,496 $192,053 Conferences, Career Fairs $112,989 $51,526 $19,530 $4,471 $732 $227,853 $4,271 $421,372 Trade Shows $45,003 $30,782 1 $25,659 $21,039 $682 $28,740 $17,181 $169,086 Total $1,468,809 $1,047,713 $710,787 $399,686 $68,782 $1,59h,658 $280,797 $5,573,231 Table 3. 2016 Non -local Person -Day Expenditures by Event Category. Event Type Lodging Food Gas Retail Recreation Access Other Total hIorse Shows $815,726 $566,350 $178,620 $231,574 $13,868 $762,164 $65,949 $2,634,251 Livestock Shows 5468,176 $218,870 $46,386 $74,507 $3,614 $206,668 $6,268 $1,024,488 Dog Shows $7,754 $3,964 $5,663 $2,658 $18 $0 $43 $20,100 Rodeos $236,034 $376,703 $240,134 $68,848 $48,662 $879,851 $17,771 $1,868,002 Spectator Events $37,653 $60,093 $38,307 $10,983 $7,763 $0 $2,835 $157,634 Conferences, Career Fairs $216,640 $108,960 $26,080 $1,280 $0 $642,703 $800 $996,463 Trade Shows $13,693 $16,110 $7,478 $13,088 $0 $10,665 $15,465 $76,498 Total $1,795,676 $1,351,050 $542,666 $402,937 $73,924 $2,502,050 $109,131 $6,777,435 It should be noted that only access fees that remain in the Brazos County economy are included in spending. For example, if an event is hosted by local organizers, fees are included in the analysis. If an event is hosted by an association headquartered outside the county, fees for that event are not included the spending totals reported above and used in the impact analysis. This is accomplished by only applying person -day access fees to non -local person -days for events organized within Brazos County. All other access fees are excluded from the analysis. Economic Impacts of Expo Events in the Brazos County Economy The direct spending by visitors to the Expo Complex is not the only benefit to the local econonry. Economic contribution analysis is based on the idea that a dollar spent in a region stimulates additional economic activity, or multiplies as it circulates through the economy. This multiplier effect recognizes that the total effect on output, employment, personal income, and government revenue in the region is greater than the initial dollar spent. A visitor's expenditure at a local restaurant or store contributes not only to that business, but to its suppliers and its suppliers' suppliers (the indirect effect), the incomes of each of their employees who then spend their earnings (the induced effect), and tax revenues. Of course, some of the original expenditure leaks out of the regional economy, for example as inventory is imported from other regions, employees commute from other regions, and businesses and households pay state and federal taxes. Multipliers are calculated based on the purchasing patterns of industries and institutions in the regional economy. The total effects are the sum of direct, indirect and induced for each of the outcomes: employment, labor income, total value added (contribution to gross regional project) and output (gross sales). Only expenditures by visitors are included in the economic impact analysis because their spending represents new money in the county economy. It is assumed that local county residents might have spent their money elsewhere in the county if they had not attended an Expo event; thus, there is no economic impact. Access fees are excluded from the impact analysis because the fee is often paid to an event sponsor located outside Brazos County, and much of the fee is likely an immediate leakage from the local economy. Four types of multiplier effects are reported in the impact analyses. The Output or sales multiplier measures the effect of external spending on overall economic activity in the region. 'I he output multiplier provides the largest economic impact value and therefore is reported in many studies; however, the output multiplier says nothing about how the event affects the welfare of households or the profitability of businesses. The value-added multiplier is a more appropriate measure of regional welfare. The value-added multiplier measures Expo visitors' contribution to regional gross domestic product (GDP). It is the value added to the regional economy or the return to local resources used in the production of goods and services in Brazos County. The labor income multiplier is part of the value-added multiplier but is often reported alone. The wage and proprietor's income multiplier measures the effect of final demand spending on the incomes of households in the region and is appropriate for disceming the benefit of an event to a region's residents. The employment multiplier measures the effect of the event on regional employment. Calculation of the employment multiplier assumes that existing employees are fully occupied and docs not distinguish between full - fine and part -lime workers. Horse Shows Horse shows made up 20 of 176 events at the Expo. Using 2014-2016 average spending, an estimated $1.8 million was spent by out -of -county participants and attendees at the 20 Expo horse shows in FY 2016, resulting in an economic impact of $2.4 million in output and 26.4 jobs (Tables 4 and 5). Table 4. Economic impact of visitor's at all horse shows, FY 2016 (2014-2016 average spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $1,757,600 $870,100 $449,000 20.8 Indirect Effect $348,300 $172,900 $103,700 2.8 Induced Effect $332,900 $187,000 $99,400 2.8 Total Effect $2,438,700 $1,230,000 $652,200 26.4 fable 5. Economic impact of visitors at all horse shows, FY 2016 (2016 reported spending Impact Type Output Value Labor Added Income Employment Direct Effect $2,634,300 $1,450,200 $708,400 31.9 Indirect Effect $535,600 $265,700 $159,000 4.3 Induced Effect $522,400 $293,400 $156,100 4.3 Total Effect $3,692,200 beJ200 " $1,023 40.5 Vol. ,2 50 pg. lo U Livestock Shows Livestock shows made up 13 events. An estimated $900,600 was spent by out -of -county livestock show participants and attendees at those 13 events (using 2014-2016 average spending), resulting in an economic impact of $1.3 million in output and 13.9 jobs (Tables 6 and 7). Table 6. Economic impact of visitors at all livestock shows, FY 2016 (2014-2016 average spending Table 7. Economic impact of visitors at all livestock shows, FY 2016 (2016 reported spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $1,024,500 $566,400 $282,100 13.2 Indirect Effect $235,700 $116,700 $71,200 1.9 Induced Effect $212,800 Total Effect $1,473.000 Dog Shows $119,500 $63,600 $802,600 $416,900 1.8 16.8 The Expo hosted its first major dog show in FY2015 and hosted diree much smatter dog events in FY2016. 'Chose events were not surveyed so impacts are estimated based on inflated 2015 spending. An estimated $20,100 was spent by nonlocal dog show, participants and attendees, resulting in an economic impact of $27,300 in output (Table 8). Table S. Economic impact of visitors at all dog shows, FY 2016 (based on inflated 2015 spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $20,100 $7,700 $4,600 0.2 Indirect Effect $3,700 $1,900 $1,100 Induced Effect $3,400 $1,900 $1,000 Total Effect $27,300 $11,400 $6,700 0.3 Vol..,... c;Z i 0` Pg. /G% Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $900,600 $427,300 $229,300 10.9 Indirect Effect $187,500 $93,100 $56,300 1.5 Induced Effect $172,000 $96,600 $51,400 1.4 Total Effect $1,260.100 $616,900 $336.900 13.9 Table 7. Economic impact of visitors at all livestock shows, FY 2016 (2016 reported spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $1,024,500 $566,400 $282,100 13.2 Indirect Effect $235,700 $116,700 $71,200 1.9 Induced Effect $212,800 Total Effect $1,473.000 Dog Shows $119,500 $63,600 $802,600 $416,900 1.8 16.8 The Expo hosted its first major dog show in FY2015 and hosted diree much smatter dog events in FY2016. 'Chose events were not surveyed so impacts are estimated based on inflated 2015 spending. An estimated $20,100 was spent by nonlocal dog show, participants and attendees, resulting in an economic impact of $27,300 in output (Table 8). Table S. Economic impact of visitors at all dog shows, FY 2016 (based on inflated 2015 spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $20,100 $7,700 $4,600 0.2 Indirect Effect $3,700 $1,900 $1,100 Induced Effect $3,400 $1,900 $1,000 Total Effect $27,300 $11,400 $6,700 0.3 Vol..,... c;Z i 0` Pg. /G% Rodeos and Otlier Equine Events The expo hosted 17 rodeos, ropings, and barrel races in 2016. An estimated $2.1 million was spent by out -of - county rodeo and other equine event participants and attendees at those 17 events, resulting in an economic impact of $2.8 million in output and 26.6 jobs (Tables 9 and 10). Table 9. Economic impact of visitors at all rodeos and other equine events, FY 2016 (2014-2016 average 'Cable 10. Economic impact of visitors at all rodeos and other equine events, FY 2016 (2016 reported spending). Output Value Labor Employment Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $2,112,400 $1,156,100 $512,400 20.9 Indirect Effect $350,100 $174,000 $101,900 2.7 Induced Effect $369,900 $207,700 $110,500 3 Total Effect $2,832,400 $1,537,700 $724,800 26.6 'Cable 10. Economic impact of visitors at all rodeos and other equine events, FY 2016 (2016 reported spending). Miscellaneous Spectator Events The Expo hosted nine miscellaneous spectator events in 2016, including sporting events and car shows. This category, while not new, is a growing share of Expo business. Spectator events were not surveyed in 2016, but these events have a profile similar to rodeos so the rodeo spending pattern was used to estimate the impact of these miscellaneous spectator events. Future efforts will focus on surveying spectator evens. Spending by nonlocal participants was estimated at $192,100, resulting in an economic impact of $258,100 in output and 2.8 jobs (fables I I and 12). Table 11. Economic impact of visitors at all miscellaneous sporting events, FY 2016 (2014-2016 average Value Labor Impact Type Output Value Labor Employment Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $1,868,000 $1,086,700 $484,700 20 Indirect Effect $324,200 $161,100 $93,800 2.5 Induced Effect $348,300 $195,600 $104,100 2.9 Total Effect .^,52,540,500 $1,443,400 $682,500 25.4 Miscellaneous Spectator Events The Expo hosted nine miscellaneous spectator events in 2016, including sporting events and car shows. This category, while not new, is a growing share of Expo business. Spectator events were not surveyed in 2016, but these events have a profile similar to rodeos so the rodeo spending pattern was used to estimate the impact of these miscellaneous spectator events. Future efforts will focus on surveying spectator evens. Spending by nonlocal participants was estimated at $192,100, resulting in an economic impact of $258,100 in output and 2.8 jobs (fables I I and 12). Table 11. Economic impact of visitors at all miscellaneous sporting events, FY 2016 (2014-2016 average Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $192,100 $70,900 $45,500 2.3 Indirect Effect $32,900 $16,400 $9,600 0.3 Induced Effect $33,100 $18,600 $9,900 0.3 'Total Effect $258,100 $106,000 $64,900 2.8 Table 12. Economic impact of visitors at all miscellaneous sporting events, FY 2016 (2016 reported spending). Impact Type Output Value Added Labor Income Employment Direct Effect $157,600 $63,500 $42,200 2.2 Indirect Effect $29,500 $14,700 $8,500 0.2 Induced Effect $30,500 $17,100 $9,100 0.3 Total Effect $217,600 $95,300 $59,800 2.7 Vol. C2 `� pg. m,2 Conferences and Career Fairs Ten conferences and career fairs were held in 2016. Aggregate average spending of $421,400 by nonlocal attendees at those six career fairs and four con lerences was associated with an economic impact of $585,700 in output and 5.6jobs (Table 13). Differences between the figures in Tables 13 and 14 reflect 2016 spending that was sharply higher than in the previous two years, although 2016 spending levels remained well below 2013 conference spending. The results show the variation in spending between events and highlight the importance of focusing on the three -year - average. Table 13. Economic impact of visitors at all conferences and career fairs, FY 2016 (2014-2016 average spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $421,400 $272,200 $109,200 4.2 Indirect Effect $83,600 $41,300 $25,000 0.7 Induced Effect $80,800 $45,400 $24,100 0.6 Total Effect $585,700 $358,900 $158,300 5.6 'fable 14. Economic impact of visitors at all conferences and career fairs, FY 2016 (2016 reported spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $996,500 $683,100 $261,500 9.8 Indirect Effect $193,200 $95,400 $57,500 1.5 Induced Effect $192,000 $107,800 $57,400 1.5 Total Effect $1,381,600 $886,300 $376,300 12.9 Trade Shows The Expo hosted 14 trade shows in 2016. An estimated $169,100 was spent by out -of -county participants (primarily vendors) at those events, resulting in an economic impact of $227,800 in output and 2.3 jobs (Table 15). No trade shows were surveyed in 2016, so 2016 impacts are calculated using inflated 2015 spending (Table 16). The 2015 spending levels were much lower than the 2014 spending included in the three -year -average. Table 15. Economic impact of visitors at all trade shows, FY 2016 (2014-2016 average spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $169,100 $75,500 $39,800 1.8 Indirect Effect $29,500 $14,700 $8,700 0.2 Induced Effect $29,200 $16,400 $8,700 0.2 Total Effect $227,800 $106,500 $57,200 2.3 Table 16. Economic impact of visitors at all trade shows, FY 2016 (based on inflated 2015 spending). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $76,500 $31,700 $18,000 0.9 Indirect Effect $12,100 $6,000 $3,500 0.1 Induced Effect $12,900 $7,300 $3,900 0.1 Total Effect $101,500 $45,000 $25,300 1.0 Vol. " .S0 pg. /c� Summary Across the seven types of events studied, nonlocal visitors to the Expo spent an estimated $5.5 million, calculated by average FY 2014-2016 spending. This figure is the direct output effect in Table 17 and excludes access fees paid to entities outside the region. These visitors contributed approximately $7.6 million in total sales, $4.0 million in value added (GDP), $2.0 million in labor income, and 77.9 full and part-time jobs across the county economy. Value added and labor income are subsets of GDP, so these figures cannot be summed. Table 17. Economic impact of Expo visitors extrapolated across five event types, FY 2016 (2014-2016 average Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $5,573,200 $2,879,800 $1,389,700 61.1 Indirect Effect $1,035,600 $514,100 $306,300 Induced Effect 51,021,300 $573,600 $305,100 8.2 8.3 Total Effect $7,630,100 $3,967,500 $2,001,100 77.9 When relying solely on 2016 reported spending, overall impact was higher due to higher spending per person -day was higher at horse shows and at conferences and careers fairs surveyed in 2016 (liable 18). Conversely, the latest reported spending was lower than average at rodeos after accounting for non -local access fees and at trade shows. Relative to 2015, larger impacts also reflect a 12% increase in person -days at the Expo. Table 18. Economic impact of Expo visitors extrapolated across seven event types, FY 2016 (2016 reported spending, except where noted for dog shows and trade shows). Value Labor Impact Type Output Added Income Employment Direct Effect $6,777,400 $3,889,100 $1,801,300 78.2 Indirect Effect $1,333,900 $661,400 $394,600 10.5 Induced Effect $1,322,400 $742,700 $395,100 10.9 Total Effect $9,433,700 $5,293,200 $2,591,000 99.6 The above estimate does not include the contribution of the Brazos Valley Fair & Expo. Furthermore, it does not reflect the expenditures of people attending wedding receptions and other private events at the Expo. Nor does it reflect the value of expenditures by locals attending Expo events or the value of having a venue where locals can host and attend community events. The growth in total economic output attributable to the Expo has been at least 10% annually since 2013, when the first full study was completed. Output growth topped 20" in 2016, driven by higher spending and a larger number of person -days. Outputs reported in Table 19 are based on two- or three-year average spending (only two years of data were availabe in 2013). These figures are presented as shown in previous reports and are not further adjusted for inflation. Employment has been more stable and is dependent upon the purchasing patterns by surveyed participants as well as relationships between employees and industries in the economy. Table 19. Reported economic impact of Expo visitors extrapolated across event types, FY 2014 — FY 2016. Impact Type Output Employment Output Growth 2013 $5,132,300 66.5 2014 $5,729,900 67.8 11.6% 2015 $6,316,200 67.7 10.2% 2016 $7,630,100 77.9 20.80% Vol. ZJ Pg G �! Resolution Crimes Against Women Unit WHEREAS, The Brazos County Commissioners Court finds it in the best interest of the citizens of Brazos County that the Crimes Against Women Unit be operated for the 2018 year; and WHEREAS, The Brazos County Commissioners Court agrees to provide applicable matching funds for the said project as required by the Criminal Justice Division grant application; and WHEREAS, The Brazos County Commissioners Court agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of the Criminal Justice Division funds, The Brazos County Commissioners Court assures that the funds will be returned be to the Criminal Justice Division in full. WHEREAS, The Brazos County Commissioners Court designates Duane Peters as the grantee's authorized official. The authorized official is given the power to apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant on behalf the applicant agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that The Brazos County Commissioners Court approves the submission of the grant application for the Crimes Against Women Unit to the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division. RESOLVED THIS C><O DAY OF Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct 1 F01-� ✓`_� Pg. BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS ACCEPTANCE OF DONATED/AWARDED PROPERTY 0 DONATION OF COUNTY PROPERTY Date: 02119/17 Acceptance of Donated/Awarded Property []Donation of County Property (Awarded property requires signed court documentation) MX Acceptance of Donated Inmate Property (Requires signed inmate documentation—NO VALUE ASSESSED) Item Description: Unclaimed Inmate Property Please provide all information requested below as applicable to the property being accepted or donated. Forms containing nay blank fields will be returned for completion. Make: Model: Year. SN/VIN #: ❑ Functional ❑ Non -Functional. Explain if Non -Functional Additional Description/information; Unclaimed Clothing and other Items left by Inmates leaving BCDC In the month of January 2016. Estimated Value: Check box for Capital Asset (value/initial cost is over $5000) Check the appropriate account based on Check the appropriate entity property being estimated value of property being accepted: donated to: ❑ 61115000 (Donation -Other)* Government Entity: Brazos County Sheriffs Office ❑ 60010WO(No Asset Tag - Under $500) Organization Name ❑ 67010000(Minor Property -$5W-$4999) Other (Due to Statuatory ❑ 8001WW(Capital Pmpery-Over $5000) requhements prior approval Brazos County Sheriffs Office is required by purchasing: Organization Nano *Donation =Other to be usedforfundi donated to Brazos County for use of o non -county expenditure I certify that the above mentioned item has been donated or awarded to Brazos County. This item has been received in good faith and upon approval by Commissioner's Court will become a part of the General Fixed Asset Account of Brazos County. The determination to accept or reject the donation will be made at the sole discretions of Commissioners Court based upon such things as usefulness, projected operating, maintenance and insurance costs. Requesting Department: Brazos County Sheriffs Office (�(�.MI Department Name , Authorized Signature Organization Receiving Donated Property: 9_ ,, Q LGri`^- Authorized Signature Ilk Zby Co missionCou on thisO day of Commissioners Court Approval Fvol. _ BRAZOSCOUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COURT ACTION FORM DEPARTMENT Road and Bridge DEPT. NUMBER 56001000 DATE OF COURT MEETING: February 28, 2017 ITEM: Consider and take action on approval of the Brazos County Subdivision Regulations' attached Fees ((g various services) effective as of Marcfi 1, 2017. SOURCE OF FUNDS: N/A NOTES/REQUIREMENTS: SUB D BY: u� R. Alan Munger, P.E. County Engineer ACKN�GED BY: Steve Aldrich Conn Comt issio r, Preci t M 1 y -6taXna Co�mmissi er, Precinct 2 YaG.a-X Z� Nancy Berry Con. 'ss• c ct S Irma Cauley Commissioner, Precinct 4 This Request is [IdAPPROVED / DENIED [ ] by Commissioners' Court Date: v2 ii E. Duane Peters, County Judge Vol. _ ; Pg, /G % March 1, 2017 January 1, 2018 PLATTING SERVICES (Plus Public Notice Fees) Preliminary Plan $150+$5 per lot $150+$10 per lot Final Plat $150+$10 per lot $200+$20 per lot Amending Plat $100 $100 Simplified Final Plat $100 $100 Replat $150 $200 Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements $100 $100 Variance Request $0 $0 DFVFLOPMFNT AND INSPECTION SERVICES Driveway Culvert Permit New Residential Private Install $100 Private Install $100 Existing Residential (includes modifications, i.e. extra pipe, etc.) Private Install $50 Private Install $50 New Commercial $100 $100 Existing Commercial (includes modifications, i.e. extra pipe, etc.) $50 $50 Subdivision Construction Inspections 0.5% of Infrastructure Cost 1% of Infrastructure Cost Re -Inspection Fee $50-$100 $50-$100 nM-CITF CFDTIr FArll IN DFRMIT CFRVIrFG Residential See Brazos County Health District See Brazos County Health District Commercial See Brazos County Health District See Brazos County Health District Modification See Brazos County Health District See Brazos County Health District Re -Inspection See Brazos County Health District See Brazos County Health District nTUFR Floodplain Permit Single -Family Lot outside of Floodplain $20 $20 Single -Family Lot within Floodplain $100+Bond $100+Bond Non-Single-Family/Commercial $500+ Bond $500+ Bond Manufactured Home Park in Floodplain $100 $100 All other Developments in Floodplain (paving, storage sheds, pools etc.) $100 $100 Junk/Auto-Salvage/Wrecking Yards Permit $25a -S Pipeline Crossing Permit $500+ Bond $500+Bond Plan Review for Commercial Development $300.00 $300.00 Infrastructure Development Plan (For Manufactured Home and RV Parks) $200+$10 per lot $200+$10 per lot Copy of Plat (24x36) $20 per page $2D per page County Roll Map (2436) $15 per page $15 per page County Roll Map (3608) $20 per page $20 per page Cost of Public Notifications Varies Varies Tax Certificates for Platting See Tax Office Rates See Tax Office Rates Vol. P9• _ZLLI RESOLUTION A. WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, also known as the INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT, authorizes all local government entities to contract with each other to provide a governmental function or service that each party to the contract Is authorized to perform individually and in which the contracting parties are mutually interested; and B. WHEREAS, College Station Independent School District ("CSISD"), and Brazos County, Texas ("County) are local government entities, each acting by and through their duly authorized agents (collectively, the "Parties"); and C. WHEREAS, CSISD, pursuant to the authority granted under Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, desires to enter the School Resource Deputy Interlocal Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A ('ILA"), for the purpose of participating with the County in the placement of a School Resource Deputy in certain CSISD facilities; and D. WHEREAS, CSISD agrees that the ILA will mutually benefit each Party and will further each Party's governmental purpose; and E. WHEREAS, the Board desires to authorize the execution of the ILA by CSISD, and to authorize the Board President, the Superintendent or their appointed designees, to do any and all things necessary to carry out the terms of the ILA, and take all other action contemplated thereby. NOW, THEREFORE, on motion made and seconded, it is hereby resolved that: 1. The terms and conditions of the ILA, and any other documents necessary to effectuate the ILA, are found to be acceptable and In the best interest of CSISD and its citizens, and are hereby in all things approved. 2. The Board further resolves that the ILA as approved by this resolution Is Inconformity with the Texas Government Code. 3. The Board further authorizes the Board President to execute the ILA on behalf of CSISD, and further authorizes the Board President, the Superintendent or their appointed designees, to do any and all things necessary to carry out the terms of the ILA, and take all other action contemplated thereby. Valens Jochen, Presidebt, Board of Trustees of the College Station Independent School District Date: 2-2-1- j 1 28629:Resau.moN lLA_SCHOOL RESOURCE DEPUTY W. 12.,5Z Pg. /617 PACE I EXHIBIT A School Resource Deputy Interlocal Agreement Between Brazos County and the College Station Independent School District [attached] 28629:REsO.UTION ILA_$CMOOL RESOURCE DEPUTY E-, 2-: . zPg. // a This Interlocal Governmental Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between the County of Brazos, ("County") a political subdivision of the State of Texas, acting by and through its County Commissioner's Court and the College Station Independent School District ("CSISD" or "the District"), a political subdivision of the State of Texas, acting by and through its Board of Trustees, collectively ("Parties"). Both Parties acknowledge the continuing need for a School Resource Deputy ("SRD") Program for CSISD. The Parties agree to establish a SRD Program in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, also known as the INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT, authorizes all local governments to contract with each other to provide a governmental function or service that each party to the contract is authorized to perform individually and in which the contracting Parties are mutually interested; and WHEREAS, the Parties have sufficient funds available from current revenues to perform the functions contemplated by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the County has, prior to this Agreement, established a SRD Program with law enforcement deputies from the Brazos County Sheriffs Office ("BCSO"); and WHEREAS, the Parties recognize the outstanding benefits of the SRD Program to the citizens of Brazos County and to the students of CSISD; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Parties, the citizens of Brazos County, and the students of CSISD to establish the SRD Program; and WHEREAS, County is willing to participate in .the Agreement with the understanding that the financial burden to Brazos County tax payers is a net zero; and NOW, THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION of the recitals and mutual covenants made herein by the County and CSISD to be respectively kept and performed, the Parties hereby mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS The following terms shall have the following meanings when used in this Agreement: 1.1 The Sheriff means the elected Brazos County Sheriff and shall also apply to any person designated by the Sheriff to act on their behalf in regards to this Agreement. BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. Page 1 28629: eCSOCSISD SRO IIA 1-30-17 final [Vol. Pg. ��� 1.2 School Superintendent means the CSISD School Superintendent and shall also apply to any person designated by the Superintendent to act on their behalf in regards to this Agreement. 1.3 Law Enforcement Deputy means any BCSO Deputy who is commissioned under Texas law. 1.4 Law Enforcement Duties means any duties performed by any Law Enforcement Deputy. 1.5 School Resource Deputy (SRD) means any Law Enforcement Deputy assigned to and aiding the administration and student bodies of selected CSISD campuses and facilities. The SRD's general responsibilities are to provide security and crime prevention services in schools. The SRD's role may be divided into three areas: Educator, Informal Counselor, and Law Enforcement Deputy. ARTICLE II MISSION AND PURPOSE 2.1 The mission of the SRD program is the reduction and prevention of school - related violence and crime committed by juveniles and young adults, the reduction of the fear of crime on school campuses, and building effective partnerships with the faculty and staff of CSISD. This is accomplished by assigning Law Enforcement Deputies to school facilities. The SRD Program accomplishes this mission by creating and maintaining safe, secure and orderly learning environments for students, teachers, and staff. 2.2 The SRDs will establish a trusting channel of communication with students, parents, and teachers. SRDs will serve as a positive role model to instill in students good moral standards, good judgment and discretion, respect for other students, and a sincere concern for the school community. SRDs will promote citizen awareness of the law to enable students to become better informed and effective citizens, while empowering students with the knowledge of law enforcement efforts and obligations regarding enforcement as well as consequences for violations of the law. 2.3 SRDs will serve as a confidential source of counseling for students and parents concerning problems they face as well as providing information on community resources available to them. Goals and objectives are designed to develop and enhance rapport between youth, police Deputies, and school administrators. ARTICLE 111 TERM AND TERMINATION 3.1 This Agreement begins on March 1, 2017, and shall end, unless extended, on February 28, 2022, at midnight (5) years. BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. Page Z 28629: BCSOCSISD SRO ILA 1-30-17 final Vol. 57� P //� 3.2 Any Party may terminate its participation in this agreement by providing one hundred eighty (180) days written notice. In the event of termination of this agreement, compensation shall be made to the County for all SRD services performed to the date of termination. ARTICLE IV SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS 4.1 The Sheriff shall assign SRDs to the following school campuses on a full time basis during the Fall and Spring Semesters of the school year. During the Summer Session, SRDs will periodically patrol the schools on a part time basis during the Summer months when school is not in regular session. The Parties shall review SRD needs for any upcoming school year in as timely a fashion as possible. a. One (1) SRD at A&M Consolidated High School to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police -student relations, b. One (1) SRD at College Station High School to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police -student relations. C. One (1) SRD at College Station Middle School, to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police -student relations, d. One (1) SRD at A&M Consolidated Middle School, to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police -student relations. e. One (1) SRD Sergeant, supervisor of SRDs, to split time between College View High School and the Center for Alternative Learning, to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police -student relations. The Sergeant shall be provided an office separate and apart from school administrative offices. 4.2 In the sole discretion of the Sheriff but after consultation with the CSISD, the Sheriff may adjust the amount of time spent by each SRD at each campus. 4.3 Any SRD assignments to other CSISD schools will be negotiated in advance of the school year and shall be governed under the same terms set forth in this Agreement. ARTICLE V SRD DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. Page 3 28629: BCSOCSISD SRO ILA 1-30-17 final FVol. L pg. Generally The services to be provided by County to CSISD are law enforcement activities to be performed primarily on the designated campuses by SRDs. During the term of this contract, each SRD will work a total of 2080 hours during each twelve (12) month period inclusive of Permissible Leave as described below. Each SRD shall perform their duties in accordance with three general areas: Administrative, Law Enforcement, and Educational and Counseling. 5.1 Administrative Duties a. SRDs will check in with designated school staff upon arriving on campus and will report with school staff prior to leaving campus, unless circumstances prevent the SRD from checking in or out. b. The day-to-day operation and administrative control of the SRD Program will be the responsibility of the BCSO. Responsibility for the conduct of SRD personnel, both personally and professionally, shall remain with the BCSO... SRDs shall remain employees of the BCSO and shall not be employees of the CSISD. C. All acts of commission shall conform to the guidelines of the BCSO's Policy and Procedure Manual. d. SRDs will not enforce school or house rules, SRDs are not school disciplinarians and will not assume that role. However, if the principal or other staff believes an incident involves a violation of the law, the principal or staff member may contact the SRD and the SRD will determine whether law enforcement action is appropriate. 5.2 Law Enforcement Duties a. Enforce the laws of the State of Texas. b. Assist CSISD in maintaining lawful order on school property while in full BCSO uniform at all times or other apparel approved by the BCSO. C. Protect the students, teachers, staff, and public against criminal activity d. Take enforcement action on criminal matters according to BCSO policy. As soon as practical, the SRD shall make the principal of the school aware of such action. At the principal's request, the SRD shall take appropriate law enforcement action against intruders and unwanted guests who may appear at BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017- Contract No. Page 4 28629: BCSOCSISD SRD ILA 1-30-17 final Vol. SZ Pg. the school and school functions, to the extent that the SRD may do so under the authority of law. e. Gather information regarding potential problems such as gang activity, criminal activity, and student unrest and handle initial reports of crimes committed on campus during school hours f. Coordinate investigative procedures between law enforcement and school administrators that follow BCsO Policy. g. Conduct investigations of criminal violations (with the exception of major criminal violations such as murder or sexual assault in which instance the Deputies will assist the law enforcement agency with primary jurisdiction) occurring on CSISD property or at CSISD-sponsored or school -related activities. 5.3 Educational and Counseling Duties a. Provide information about law enforcement topics to students and staff. b. Provide informational programs for CSISD staff, students, and parents on a variety of topics including, but not limited to issues related to alcohol and other drugs, criminal law, violence, gangs, safety and security. C. Refer students and their families to the appropriate agencies for assistance when the need is determined. d. Maintain good communication between BCSO and CSISD administration, principals, and staff. e. SRDs will not replace any school counselor nor are they to conduct or offer any formal psychological testing or counseling. f. SRDs will give advice to help resolve issues between students that involve matters that may result in a criminal violation, disturbances, and disruptions. g. SRDs should not go to the home of a student without another deputy or school administrator. When a visit is warranted, it should be reported to the SRD supervisor as soon as practical. In. Student confidentiality should be maintained, unless the gravity of the situation dictates otherwise to the extent permitted under law. 5.4 Regular Hours, Vacation, Personal Leave, Overtime, and Training Responsibilities BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. Page 5 20629; BCSOCSISD SRO ILA 1-3017 final a. Each SRD shall be assigned on a full-time basis for eight (8) hours, on those days and during those hours that the school is in regular session b. The SRD hours and days of work are to be considered flexible and may be changed to meet the needs of the BCSO or at the direction of the Sheriff. C. Before taking any personal leave time, the school principal must be made aware of the SRDs absence. Each SRD will follow the BCSO leave policy; however, no deputy may take personal leave/vacation time during the school year without prior approval from their BCSO supervisor. d. When a SRD is temporarily absent from their assigned campus for training or other reasons on a day that the school is in session, the BCSO will make reasonable efforts to provide a police presence for that campus by assigning other SRDs or deputies. When a deputy is needed on campus at times when the SRD or other deputy is not on campus, school personnel should call the BCSO dispatch at the non -emergency number 979-361-3888/4980 or dial 9-1-1 in case of an emergency. e. SRDs are subject to current policy and procedures that are in effect for all BCSO Deputies, including attendance at all mandated training and testing to maintain state peace officer licensing and certification. This training and certification takes place throughout the year and may necessitate the temporary absence of the SRD from his or her assigned campus. f. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Extracurricular Assignments" means law enforcement services provided by law enforcement personnel at CSISD events that occur outside of their regularly scheduled duty day. Extracurricular Assignments are expressly excluded from the purview of this Agreement. CSISD shall establish and operate its own program for appointment of law enforcement personnel from various law enforcement jurisdictions located in Brazos County to Extracurricular Assignments, as further described in Exhibit "A", separate and apart from this Agreement and independent of their employment with the County. To the extent that any Deputy performing services under this Agreement voluntarily participates in the CSISD Extracurricular Assignment Program, such Extracurricular Assignment shall be compensated under the terms of that Program and shall not be considered service under the terms of this Agreement for any purpose. No Deputy shall be expected to, required or instructed by any CSISD official or the SRD supervisor or any other County employee to participate in the Extracurricular Assignment Program. Though the County and CSISD believe that the Extracurricular Assignments Program is subject to the "Special detail work" exception to overtime requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act pursuant to 29 USC § 207(P), if the performance of Extracurricular Assignment work results in any Deputy(s) working overtime hours legally compensable by the County, and the Deputy is classified as non-exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, then CSISD shall BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. Page 6 28629: BCSOCSISD SRO ILA 1-30-17 final Vol. _ Py. ��� be responsible for the appropriate overtime rates for the compensable overtime hours worked in that work period, as set forth below in Consideration. ARTICLE VI SELECTION TRANSFER AND REMOVAL OF SRD 6.1 Notice of SRD job openings will be made to all Law Enforcement Deputies at BCSO through regular postings. BCSO policy at the time of the opening will be followed during the selection process for SRDs. The Deputy(s) will be interviewed by a board consisting of BCSO representatives as determined by the Sheriff and representatives of the school for which the SRD will be assigned as determined by the school principal. The Sheriff or his appointed designee will make the final decision on all appointments or assignments related to the SRD program. 6.2 Reserved 6.3 An SRD may request to transfer to another school if the request meets the approval of the principals of each affected school and the Sheriff or his appointed designee. 6A If the CSISD is dissatisfied with the performance of a SRD, the district will notify the SRD supervisor who will attempt to resolve the issue to the satisfaction of both the school district and the police department. If the SRD supervisor cannot resolve the issue, he/she will refer the issue with a recommended course of action to the Sheriff or his appointed designee. 6.5 The BCSO may take appropriate corrective or disciplinary action regarding any allegation of misconduct on the part of a SRD in accordance with BCSO policy and procedures. 6.6 The Sheriff or his appointed designee may dismiss or reassign a SRD when it is in the best interest of the County or CSISD. 6.7 In the event of a resignation, retirement, dismissal, or reassignment of a SRD, or in case of long-term absences by a SRD, BCSO will provide a temporary replacement for the SRD within thirty (30) school days of receiving notice of such absence, dismissal, resignation, retirement, reassignment. As soon as practical, an interview board shall convene and recommend a permanent replacement for the SRD position. ARTICLE VII SCHOOL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES 7.1 CSISD will provide the SRD with a portable two-way radio or program an existing radio to enable SRDs to communicate directly with the school administration. BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. Page 7 28629: BCSOCSISO SRO ILA 1-30.17 final Vol. .2.�2 pg. // 7 7.2 CSISD will provide the SRDs with access to an office that allows for security and privacy, with the exception of AMCMS. The office must include, but is not limited to, a telephone, desk with lockable drawers, chair, office supplies, filing cabinet, which can be properly locked and secured, and computer. 7.3 CSISD will provide opportunities for SRDs to address teachers and school administrators about the SRD program's goals and objectives and provide SRDs the opportunity to address teachers and school administrators about criminal justice problems relating to students during in-service workdays. 7.4 Reserved. 7.6 CSISD will seek input from SRDs regarding criminal justice problems relating to students. 7.6 Patrol Vehicles a. CSISD will provide a BCSO Patrol Vehicle for each SRD for their use in their duties and for emergency calls as needed. This vehicle will be used by SRDs for the safety and security of the faculty and students of the school. In accordance with the BCSO policy and procedures, these vehicles will be considered a take home vehicle. CSISD will pay 100% of the purchase price and equipping cost of each vehicle. b. Patrol Vehicle(s), will at all times be the property of CSISD. CSISD will Pay all of the expenses related to fuel, repairs, maintenance, insurance, and any associated costs for Patrol Vehicle(s). C. CSISD will pay for all repairs, upkeep and other associated costs for the life of the Patrol Vehicle(s). ARTICLE VIII SALARY AND BENEFITS OF SRD 8.1 CSISD agrees to reimburse the County for 100% of the SRD salaries (and any earned overtime) and fringe benefits (e.g. Total Wages, Certification Pay/Work, Longevity Pay, Cost of Living Adjustments, Training Specialist Pay, Accidental Death & Dismemberment, Group Insurance — Employer Paid, Group Life Insurance (WB), Long Tenn Disability, Medicare Portion/Social Security, Social Security - Employer Paid, TCDRS, Unemployment Compensation, and Worker's Compensation Insurance). 8,2 Parties agree to meet annually, prior to the beginning of the next school year, to negotiate increases in salaries due to merit raises earned by SRDs. BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. 20629: BCSOCSISo SRO ILA 1.30-17 nuat Page 8 Vol. Pg.: . 8.3 CSISD shall pay all expenses related to off-duty security performed by BCSO Personnel including those off-duty securities voluntarily performed by SRDs on a contractual basis at an agreed upon off-duty rate. 8.4 CSISD will pay 100% of the cost of all SRD specific and law enforcement related training and any associated travel costs. 8.5 The County will invoice CSISD quarterly. ARTICLE IX MISCELLANEOUS TERMS 9.1 Interlocal Cooperation Act The Parties expressly acknowledge that each Party to this agreement is a local government as that term is defined in the Interlocal Cooperation Act. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed as a waiver or relinquished by either Party of its right to claim such exemptions, privileges and immunities as may be provided by law. 9.2 Amendment. The terms and conditions of this agreement may be amended upon mutual consent of all Parties. Mutual consent will be demonstrated by approval of each governing body of each Party hereto. No amendment to this agreement shall be effective and binding unless and until it is reduced to writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of all Parties. 9.3 Effective. This agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution by all Parties and shall continue in effect until terminated as provided herein. 9.4 Indemnification. Subject to the limitations as to damages and liability under the Texas Tort Claims Act, and without waiving its governmental immunity, each Deputies, agents, andagreement to this employees foagrees to r harmless any 1 ability,hloss, damages, clother, its aims, or causes of action caused, or asserted to be caused, directly or indirectly by any other Party to this agreement, or any of its Deputies, agents or employees as a result of its performance under this agreement. However any increase in County's liability insurance premium that results from an act by a SRD or CSISD shall be recovered from CSISD. 9.5 Consent to Suit. Nothing in this agreement will be construed as a waiver or relinquishment by any Party of its right to claim such exemptions, privileges and immunities as may be provided by law. 9.6 Invalidity. If any provision of this agreement shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or ov, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. 28629: 8CSOCSISD SRO ILA 1.30-17 final Page 9 va. _ P9. impaired thereby. The Parties shall use their best efforts to replace the respective Provision or provisions of the agreement with legal terms and conditions approximating the original intent of the Parties. 9.7 Notices. Any notices, approval, consent, or communications by one Party to another must be in writing and be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified United States Mail, properly addressed to the respective Parties as follows: Brazos County: County Sheriff 1700 West SH 21 Bryan, Texas 77803 Tel:(979) 361-4900 Fax:(979) 361-4999 CSISD: Superintendent 1812 Welsh Street College Station, Texas 77840 Tel: (979) 764-5455 Fax:(979) 764-5492 9.8 Entire Agreement. It is understood that this agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all prior agreements, arrangements, or understandings between the Parties relating to the subject matter. No oral understandings, statements, promises, or inducements contrary to the terms of this agreement exist. This agreement cannot be changed or terminated orally. No verbal agreement efore or after the exec ton oftlthiswag eementp shaleuty,lll affect gent, orormmodify nyno eployee of ayf the artyterms or obligations hereunder. 9.9 Texas Law. This agreement has been made under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. 9.10 Venue. Performance and all matters related thereto shall be in Brazos County, Texas, United States of America. 9.11 Authority to Contract. Each Party has the full power and authority to enter into and perform this agreement and the person signing this agreement on be of each Party has been properly authorized and empowered to enter into this agreement. The persons executing this agreement hereby represent that they have authorizationto sign on behalf of their respective Governmental Bodies. 9.12 Waiver. Failure of any Party, at any time, to enforce the provision of this agreement, shall in no way constitute a waiver of that provision, nor in any way affect the validity of this agreement, any part hereof, or the right of either Party thereafter to enforce each and every provision hereof, No term of this agreement shall be deemed waived or breach excused unless the waiver shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived. Furthermore, any consent to or waiver of a breach will not constitute consent to or waiver of or excuse of any other different or subsequent breach. BCSO, CSiSO SRO Agreement 2017_ Contract No. 28629: BCSOCSISD SRO ILA 1-30-17 final Page 10 Vol. ot�� _ pg. / G 9.13 Agreement Read. The Parties acknowledge that they have read, understand, and intend to be bound by the terms and conditions of this agreement. 9.14 Assignment. This agreement and the rights and obligations contained herein may not be assigned by any Party without prior written approval of the other Party to this agreement. 9.15 Multiple Originals. It is understood and agreed that this agreement may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. [Signatures to follow on the next page] BCSO, CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No. Page 11 29629: BCSOCSISD SAO ILA 1.39-17 final Vol._ Pg /� COLLEGE STATION INDEPENDENT BRAZOS SCHOOL DISTRICT By, �04A (� By'� School Board President County Date: Z - 21- I n Date: 9CSO. CSISD SRO Agreement 2017. Contract No, Page 12 28629: BCSOCSISO SRO ILA 1 -JO -17 final Val. ��— p�J• ���� IZ ORDER FOR EMERGENCY AMENDMENT FISCAL YEAR 2017 This Order for Emergency Amendment to the Brazos County Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2017 ("Amendment") is entered into by the County of Brazos, ("County") a political subdivision of the State of Texas, acting by and through its County Commissioner's Court ("Court'). The County acknowledges the continuing need for a School Resource Deputy ("SRD") Program for the College Station Independent School District ("CSISD"). The County has agreed to establish a SRD Program in accordance with the terms and conditions of an interlocal agreement. Following the adoption of the Brazos County Budget for Fiscal Year 2017 ("Budget"), CSISD notified the County that the College Station Police Department ("CSPD") would terminate its agreement to provide school resource officers ("SRO") to CSISD. The County recognizes the outstanding benefits of the SRO program to the citizens of Brazos County and to the students of CSISD. A SRO or SRD is a career law enforcement officer with sworn authority, who is deployed by an employing agency in a community -oriented policing assignment to work in collaboration with one or more schools. SRO or SRD programs provide safe learning environments in our schools, provide valuable resources to school staff members, foster positive relationships with youth, develop strategies to resolve problems affecting youth and protect all students, so they can reach theirfullest potentials. It is in the best interest of the citizens of Brazos County, and the students of CSISD to continue to provide for the safety of the communitys students and citizens by the establishment of a school resource deputy ("SRD") Program. In order to establish the SRD program, the County finds that it is necessary to amend its Budget to add the following new positions: a. One (1) SRD at A&M Consolidated High School to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police -student relations. b. One (1) SRD at College Station High School to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police - student relations. C. One (1) SRD at College Station Middle School, to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police - student relations. d. One (1) SRD at A&M Consolidated Middle School, to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police -student relations. Vol. Pg. / 2 i e. One (1) SRD Sergeant, supervisor of SRDs, to split time between College View High School and the Center for Alternative Learning, to primarily act as a law enforcement presence, mentor, problem -solver, and provide positive police -student relations. The County understands that CSISD will reimburse the County for all costs to administer the SRD program. Texas Local Government Code §111.010(c) provides that: 'The commissioners court may authorize an emergency expenditure as an amendment to the original budget only in a case of grave public necessity to meet an unusual and unforeseen condition that could not have been included in the original budget through the use of reasonably diligent thought and attention. If the court amends the original budget to meet an emergency, the court shall file a copy of its order amending the budget with the county clerk, and the clerk shall attach the copy to the original budget.' The Court finds that the emergency expenditure as an amendment to the original budget is authorized because the County is the only reasonable agency authorized to administer the SRD program and the discontinuation of any SRO or SRD program would constitute a grave public threat to the safety of CSISD students and the citizens of Brazos County. The Court further finds that the untimely termination of the CSPD SRO program was an unforeseen condition that could not have been included in the original budget through the use of reasonably diligent thought and attention. PASSED A APP this 28th a February, 2017. Duane Peters County Jus Commissioner Steve Aldrich Precinct 1 Commis oner Nancy Berry Precinct 3 ATTEST: e� a en McQuee�n�ty C� k BRAZOSCOUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COURT ACTION FORM DEPARTMENT ROAD & BRIDGE DEPT. NUMBER 56002000 DATE OF COURT MEETING: February 28, 2017 ITEM: Consider and take action on approval and payment of a claim in an amount not to exceed $5,800.00 for driveway damaee on Anasazi Bluff/Indian Lakes Subdivision. Site is located in Precinct 1. SOURCE OF FUNDS: N/A NOTESIEXCEPTIONS: SUBMITTED BY: - �e�4 X, x - R. Alan Munger, P.E. County Engineer CC2017 This Request i ApprovedX(or) Denied Date: -)'IonL /(,I Peters, County Judge ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Steve Aldrich Commissioner, Precinct 1 by Commissioners' Court 13 BRAZOS COUNTY ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT R. Alan Munger, PE, CFM, County Engineer Memorandum Date: February 7, 2017 To: Purchasing; Legal; County Judge, From: R. Alan Munger, P.E. The Road & Bridge Department is seeking approval for Claim on Driveway Damage. Brazos County Road & Bridge entered into a Road Improvement Contract in Summer 2016 for work on portions of Indian Lakes Drive and Anasazi Bluff Drive. The work generally consisted of reclaiming existing road materials for use as an improved subgrade; construction of new base course and surfacing. Incidental work included cutting and removal of portions of driveway so that they would better intersect with the new profile grades of the reconstructed roadways. The driveway incidental work was successful except for one address. The driveway at 18402 Anasazi Bluff is circular with a "washed gravel" finish. It was sawcut by the Road & Bridge Department cleanly, however during the concrete removal portion of the operation a large crack developed (traversing the sawcut). The damage was noted at the time and Commissioner Wasserman met with the property owners to inform them that we would "make it right". The Tate's have obtained cost information from their original homebuilder (memo and estimate attached) and are seeking to settle a claim with Brazos County for the repair of the driveway. I have discussed the issue with both Tracy and Lea Ann Tate extensively. The area identified in the letter is accurate. The cost of these services is not to exceed $5800 as itemized below. 1 have reviewed the proposed scope and the proposed rates. • Removal and replacement of 328 sq. ft.....................$5300.00 • Check/Repair Lawn Irrigation upon completion ............ $250.00 • Replace Landscape Rocks, sod, grading as needed ......... $250.00 1 find the costs of services shown to be fair and recommend approval of claim and issuance of a Purchase Order to the Tate's for the repairs of damages. If culvert is damaged upon removal, this department will replace at our cost. Please let me know if there are any further questions or concerns regarding this matter. Thank you for your consideration and approval of this request! 2617 Highway 21 West Bryan, Texas 77803 Office (979)822-2127 /Fax (9 )775-0453 1 VO Morgan Custom Homes LLC 2606 Chillingham Court, College Station, Tx., 77845 979-777-8191 kmchlic@gmail.com January 25, 2017 Mr. & Mrs. Tracy Tate 18402 Anasazi Bluff Drive College Station, Tx., 77845 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Tracy Tate, Z We hereby propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor and supervision necessary for the completion of: 1. Jackhammer and remove cracked/damaged driveway and rebar in the first 3 sections on the right side of the circular driveway. 328 sq. ft. 2. Remove existing culvert and replace with new culvert and new stabilizing sand. When I met the concrete contractor at your residence, he explained that it would be likely he would damage the culvert when jack hammering the concrete. I can take this fee out, but if the culvert needs to be replaced, it will be an additional cost. 3. Reset moss rock boulders on each ends of culvert, The reason this is included in the bid is the rocks will be disturbed when the jack hammering of the concrete starts and the culvert vibrates. The rocks are positioned directly on top the culvert. $125.00 4. Replace the 3 damaged driveway sections with same washed aggregate. $5,300.00 See bid from contractor. 5. Have licensed, certified irrigation company check system after concrete work is done. $250:00 .6. Regrade and relevel areas around and along new driveway sections. Also, replace sod as needed. $125.00 Vol. 2 S -F-) pg. 477 Total price is $5,800.00 Payment is due in full when job is complete. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL: The above price, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Keith Morgan Date: January 25, 2017 Your Name Vol. _ Pg. 1 i n rWanKW 4E PEll Pa11ME0AT ' , rel : „ u � -• A, .err t' s"� r -• 1 I •a ': t h 'i , _h , � : I (�t S, t .(1 We h{re6y;propose to-fumisN lha materials and perrarm the leuor necesaory lartt{a campIa 5 y • 1 Are'"below(d%Vonaldesa{Ipgoandlaidrawinga I14 d ilii Af .T II tF tf r �•-.> ray ° t� ti. r t�! ¢ .� ) � � `� r ' ?,- �ix, 1�J��� n ;j� t t= �,,�s ,;<•+� `, ':InG ev` � t x w f �r I -s ;,i ,`; I it H it%. l KA; i !h4 tpdi�� AfQfTA�"M m al.la�gl% a '6Te'sserpe6�eG�agB`tfieabovawaik lugperfarmmetlilnacgadencewJ�,the'draw.11"ingsendspecl ,. a' capagssuhmflted,torabovewoSkand 11 "f� F�O II i l Wit-' 'kyr a menu`neer, r of ,1 ',�IF^ >, r�ytlwr• st Oollerer($ x) as { wlgjiDpymenv':beimada follows TM - ,�Yn�pt`Z �knr y5 •.r err it �% ;. r_ �.t31.�.� �Y,` yLd, 5k}r�` 1'1'+' �� ,✓< F t ° •, )'�'�J,i t�l,,..'r Tin se 1 k'� i��{ a s" r tea. n.t ::.� i 1 a:.,.. -h,.: v...yt'�^x+w', 1 qp#'•S �•Y•. '4^ !�+' n i?'� r •` �• �-rr t ti � �.`-w Sig f .3.�y'"at'F .c�«.ti s T j p 1 !�rN° k, c xr^t ..t: >E; , . x r . ` ,. "+% bs •. �ii R,� h?!+y 'FYI? y Y011 .Pylk -Maar W Vol. J pg, %�� Vol.. Pp. D /�� 6d QS� .I°n BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENT(S) FOR THE 2016-2017 BUDGET YEAR NO. 16/17 22.1-22.7 On this the 28th day of February 2017 at a regular meeting of the Commissioners' Court, the following members were present: A. Duane Peters, County Judge, Presiding B. Steve Aldrich, Commissioner, Precinct 1 C. Sammy Catalena, Commissioner, Precinct 2 D. Nancy Berry, Commissioner, Precinct 3 E. Irma Cauley, Commissioner, Precinct 4 F. Karen McQueen, County Clerk The following proceedings were held: THAT WHEREAS, on 28th day of February 2017 the Court heard and approved a budget amendment for the 2016-2017 budget year for Brazos County, Texas; and WIIEREAS, expenditure is necessary due to the necessity to meet unusual andunforeseen conditions which could not be reasonably included in the original budget adopted 6 September 2016, the following amendment(s) to the original budget are hereby authorized, as described on the attached page(s). ADOPTED AND APPROVED this the 28th day of February 2017. THE CONMSSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. By:_ Duane Peters, Coun Judge Original: County Clerk's Office and Attached to the original budget Vd. pg, /may BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 16117.22.1 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISIONCATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase I Decrease General Fond Juvenile Department TYC Contractual Services I 1,20D.5 General Fund Juvenile Department Administration I Minor Acquisitions 1.200.531 FUND DIV ACCT DRICR ACCOUNTNAME Increase Decrease 0100 31010000 71500000 CR Rental E ui meat 1 00.53 0100 31000100 67281000 Juvenile Department l 00.53 Reallocation of funds to the appronriatc accounts to p=hme a m lacement TV far the training room. v...e. .— ., .. F .y., •.ry -fl F tiY .14 1 q YA J'�{^`: .ri SS r�a�.rt>�i'YCyY S'I : FUND DIV ACCT DRICR ACCOUNTNAME Increase Decrease 0100 31010000 71500000 CR Rental E ui meat 1 00.53 0100 31000100 67281000 DR Equipment - Electronic l 00.53 r 04. BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 16117.22.2 2/28/2017 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase Decrease General Fund Commissioners Court Non -De areneutal Minor Acquisition 1189.62 General Fund Exposition Center Minor Acquisition 1189.62 Commissioners Court and Exposition Center RcaBocalion offunds to the appropriateaccm.0 to purchase a three tom amnenl sink, faucet and a hand sink to put in a concession stand. _.....�. ..._.:.m W" JTJ. y. For.Ae6oimhn P.nr oSes Onf rs i fM q1 I-IXi: ,>M'+1 ., ...lvi t414,,,. .V. 11t FUND DIV ACCT DR/CR ACCOUNT NAME Increase Decrease 0100 11000500 67286000 CR Equipment - Other 1.189.62 0100 36000100 67101000 DR Minor Structure Improvements 1,189.62 F04. --21E BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 16117 - 22.3 2I2arrnI7 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase I Decrease Geneml Fund Commissioners Court Non-Departinenmi Minor Acquisition 2,591.53 General Fund hrforwalion Technoloey LT. Services Minor Acquisition 2591.53 FUND DIV ACCT DRICR ACCOUNTNAME Increase Decrease 0100 Commissioners Court and Information Tcchnolow 67203000 Reallocation of funds to the appropriate accounts to p=hase a scanner and imprinter that is an the aaed rollout fist for the District Clerk. FUND DIV ACCT DRICR ACCOUNTNAME Increase Decrease 0100 11000500 67203000 CR Minor Computer Hardware 2591.53 0100 14000200 67203000 DR Minor Computer Hardware 2,591.53 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 16117.22.4 212812017 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase Decrease General Fund Commissioners Court Non -De anmental Minor Acquisition 48,521.02 General Fund Information Technology LT. Services Departmental Support 1,736.68 General Fund Information Technology I.T. Services Minor Acquisition 41574.22 General Fund CR Transfer to Capitol Ira r. Fund 5 10.12 Gen. Permment Improvement Fund 14000200 Transfer from General Fwd 5 10.12 Gen. Permanent Improvement Fund Capital Projects Ca ital Outlay 5210.12 67203000 DR Minor -Computer Hardware 41574.22 0100 91110000 DR Tramsfer to Capital Imp. Fund 5 10.12 4500 Commissioners Court Information Technology, and Capital Pro'ects CR Reallocation of funds to the appropriate accounts to purchase 44 computers and 20 scanners Orat are on the rollout replacement l st for FY 17. 5,210.12 Fol:'Acco`mfiu tP i66sei'Onls I"" :'l�,r.'/ «`? ,4.. `y*.+ „^!.'i-, I iH'-TM'r.=, .. h,.`nr<?Ss t.. ri: u=�"� FUND DIV ACCT DRICR ACCOUNT NAME Increase Decrease 0100 11000500 67203000 CR Minor Computer hardware 43521.02 0100 14000200 60500000 DR Equipment & IT Enhancement 1,736.68 0100 14000200 67203000 DR Minor -Computer Hardware 41574.22 0100 91110000 DR Tramsfer to Capital Imp. Fund 5 10.12 4500 49028000 CR Transfer From General Fund 5,210.12 4500 63000500 80203000 DR Computer Hardware 5210.12 Vol. o�.�!_ P9• �,�%_ BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 16117 - 22.5 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase Decrease General Fund Donated Property - Capital 300000.00 General Fund Road and Bride Administration Capital Outlay 300 000.00 DRJCR ACCOUNT NAME I Increase Decrease 46024000 CR Donations - Capital Asset 300000.00 0100 56001000 80010000 DR Donated Property - Ca ital 300000.00 Road and Bridge To recognize a donation of 6.599 acres for new roadway. Donation was approved by Commissioners' Court on July 20, 2016. donation was not com feted in Fiscal Year2016. This budget amendments is to appropriately record the land donation. However, a budget amendment for the land F\JC � v — FCi.l - .. ..�7",.. '{ vtti"- x.ry, 3:.V.. ,. ,'t 1. 6' x.. ., .,..t..:, ,.. �"sr., FUND DIV ACCT DRJCR ACCOUNT NAME I Increase Decrease 46024000 CR Donations - Capital Asset 300000.00 0100 56001000 80010000 DR Donated Property - Ca ital 300000.00 F\JC � v — FCi.l BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGET AMENDMENTS No. 16/17-22.6 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION 1 CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase Decrease General Fund Commissioners Court Non -Departmental Minor Acquisition 10901.32 Geneml Fund Information Technoic—EV I.T. Services De anmenml Support 572.80 Geneml Fund Information Technolo I.T. Services Minor Acquisition 10,328.52 I DIV ACCT DR/CR ACCOUNT NAME III nereaso Decrease 0100 11000500 67203000 CR Minor Com uterHardwarc 10901.32 0100 14000200 60211000 DR Software -No Ta Commissioners Court and Information Technology 0100 Reallocationof ftmdsto thea propriate accounts forthe Production Server Refresh Project. 67203000 F'orvAc"irountih�Pu ..., .. fd f.$'iwli$r' osesAnl ..a�. �.a:e lc�«qq __fM�S �+ ,s-. �.q t'„x�F!'.{Y e< , x• �c aI r. .. �.4,� s � ,�; C:.�} � .o- y1 ' ,1.��Vin�. ,T4`Ji } '`4°i FUND I DIV ACCT DR/CR ACCOUNT NAME III nereaso Decrease 0100 11000500 67203000 CR Minor Com uterHardwarc 10901.32 0100 14000200 60211000 DR Software -No Ta 572.80 0100 14000200 67203000 DR Minor Com mer Hardware 10,328.52 Vol. '�:)P9• _-i_ BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS BUDGETAMENDMENTS No.16117 - 22.7 FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION CATEGORY DESCRIPTION Increase Decrease Geneml Fund Commissioners Cou Contingency De artmental Su or[ 517.84 Genemt Fuad Commissioners Court Nan -De arunental Departmental Su ort ;517.84 FUND DIV ACCT DRICR ACCOUNT NAME Increase Decrease 0100 1100li00 61130000 CR Contin enc 517.84 0100 11000500 60500000 DR E ui ment & IT Enbanccment 517.84 Commissioners Court Reallocation of funds to the aDuropriate accounts to purchase an additional reel of 1,000 foot Cat 6 cable ten IM surveillance cameras. 34. a n ?i.t...-st€. FUND DIV ACCT DRICR ACCOUNT NAME Increase Decrease 0100 1100li00 61130000 CR Contin enc 517.84 0100 11000500 60500000 DR E ui ment & IT Enbanccment 517.84 PERSONNEL 15 CHANGE OF STATUS REQUESTS Commissioner Court Date: February 28, 2017 Department Submitting Information: Human Resources Purpose of Submissions: Consider and Take Action on Change Requests Department Submitting Employee Request Action Requested Request(s) Applies To Elections Administration Velasquez, Paul Change of Status Exposition Complex Waters, Ron Separation Juvenile Services — Detention DeJesus, Joanna Separation Desir, Raymond Change of Status Robinson, Leonard Change of Status Taylor, Ashley Change of Status Sheriffs Office— Detention Bellew, Sam Employment Edwards, Shawn Employment Harrison, William Employment Sandie, Vincent Employment Approved in Commissioners' Court: Februat2181.2017 County Judge's or Commissioner's Signatur (This Copy to be attached to minutes) i SOP nnN xxw xxw nuuuwu wwnnnnnnn x xN xx xxx 3 n ox nxNxnnx u wn nnn nnn nnu n nn Nnnnnnwn n SM N M n wwwwnww wnwww wwwuww wwwwwww i SOP nnN xxw xxw nuuuwu wwnnnnnnn x xN xx xxx 3 n ox nxNxnnx u wn nnn nnn nnu n nn Nnnnnnwn n N NN nNnxNx nu x NNNNNN nnnnNwwww N M n nnnnxn M NNNxN NNNNN wNwNNMx ^ M1 nQ nNNNnnwNn nwwnnwx nxnxxxxw wwnwnnwnn N. 9 . wwww ww w n nnnnnn w NNNwn xxN w nj w NR wwww xxNxNn � ���n�N �N 3i gq�xnn n� �xN -- LJ.aa��xa� Ryxnq�nxFg a m u 3 Fvol. A