HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-09-15-9:00AM-WORKSHOP SESSION
yE OF f
fty~~' F
9
a
BRAZOS COUNTY i09q SEP I I P 5: 03
,---R_ti I:icnUEER COU!ffr OIRK
BRYAN, TEXAS „ i;r:ipjln" 'ry S
~/ec Per rT(
NOTICE OF MEETING
AND AGENDA
BRAZOS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT
WORKSHOP SESSION
THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY WILL MEET IN A
WORKSHOP SESSION ON TUESDAY 15 SEPTEMBER 2009 AT 9:00 A.M., IN THE
COMMISSIONERS COURTROOM OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING, 200 SOUTH TEXAS AVENUE, SUITE 106, BRYAN, TEXAS.
1. Call to Order.
2. Review of Brazos County Order 09-012 requiring the application of the provisions of
Subchapter P, Chapter 233, Local Government Code relating to residential building code
standards, and the effects of implementing this Order.
3. Consider possible revisions to Order 09-012.
4. Adjourn.
The County Administration Building is handicap accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign
interpretive services must be made two working days before the meeting. To make arrangements, please call (979) 361-4102.
Office of the County Judge 200 South Texas Ave. Suite 332 Bryan, Texas 77803 Fax: (979) 361-4503
QA
COMMISSIONERS' COURT
WORKSHOP SESSION
SEPTEMBER 15, 2009
The Commissioners' Court of Brazos County, Texas met in a
Workshop Session in the Commissioners' Courtroom in the Brazos
County Administration Building in Bryan, Brazos County, Texas,
beginning at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, August 15, 2009 with the
following members of the Court present:
Randy Sims, County Judge, Presiding;
Lloyd Wassermann, Commissioner of Precinct 1, Absent;
Duane Peters, Commissioner of Precinct 2;
Kenny Mallard, Commissioner of Precinct 3;
Carey Cauley, Jr., Commissioner of Precinct 4;
Karen McQueen, County Clerk, Absent.
Attached is a list of the citizens and officials in
attendance.
The Commissioner's Court met to review County Order 09-
012 requiring the application of the provisions of Subchapter
F, Chapter 233, Local Government Code relating to residential
building code standards, and the effects of implementing this
Order.
Copies were handed out to the Commissioners and it was
noted that there was a typo on #3. It says building but
should be builder.
The following spoke:
Vol ~S Page I3
Commissioners Court meeting September 15, 2009 2
Commissioner Cauley-voiced concern about #2 adding the
electrical code. Inspections cost the consumer and she would
like to remove the electrical portion
Commissioner Peters-doesn't want cost to prevent us from
doing what is necessary to protect consumers.
Richard Vance, County Engineer-said BTU had an inspection
program but is not sure if they still do.
Commissioner Cauley- asked Mr. Paul Swig if we have the
authority and he says we do have it per HB 2833.
Commissioner Peters-said with this implemented, the
county just has to keep up with paperwork the independent
inspectors used.
Gary Arnold, Director of Planning and Traffic- has
reviewed the forms they drafted with Court Counsel, Tina
Snelling. He asked for guidance from the Court. We went on
to ask, other than requiring forms was there anything else?
Commissioner Cauley-responded that was it.
Commissioner Peters-said the county would probably want
to require state certified inspectors.
Gary Arnold-replied that this information is asked for on
the form.
Commissioner Mallard-asked if the county needed to keep
up with their licensing expiration?
Vol W5 Page qq
Commissioners Court meeting September 15, 2009 3
Gary Arnold-asked how the county could do this.
Tina Snelling-said that certification is an issue. The
County has to set standards. It can be referred to the County
Attorney for a Class C Injunction.
Richard Vance-said it would be difficult for the Road &
Bridge Department to police and keep up with building. They
have a hard enough time keeping up with driveways and
mailboxes. They have no way of knowing when houses are built.
Gary Arnold-said he didn't think he had the authority to
hold electricity from being turned on before a form is filled
out.
Tina Snelling said authority is implied under the Health
and Safety Code. The question is does the county want to be
pro active or reactive.
Commissioner Peters-stated that the Court didn't have to
pass anything but that they would want a minimum of standards
enforced. The County has the authority for three (3)
inspections and so long as it doesn't over load the Road &
Bridge Department.
Gary Arnold-suggested putting the forms on the website.
Commissioner Peters-said he couldn't see the builders
getting upset since these standards are less stringent than
the cities require.
Vol lay Page 95
Commissioners Court meeting September 15, 2009 4
Richard Vance- asked about reports from rural communities
on problems with their homes.
Commissioner'Cauley-asked who these would be reported to.
She said no one seems willing to step up. She suggested
placing information on the website or in the newspaper.
Count Judge-said he was not sure he wants to do this.
Commissioner Mallard-suggested inviting the builders and
developers for input from them.
Richard Vance-said that this would take some liability
off of the builders and place it on some inspectors.
County Judge-asked Commissioner Cauley about her concerns
over the expense to the consumers building in the county.
Commissioner Cauley-replied safety is important and she's
ok with this.
Megan Lott, Road & Bridge Department- asked if we should
keep up with problems with inspectors. The members of the
court responded yes.
Commissioner Mallard-suggested getting the Information
Technology Department to help by scanning the forms.
Gary Arnold-said that was what was needed, was the
process.
Tina Snelling and Gary Arnold-said they would work on
refining the forms and developing the process.
Vol P5 Page IT(O
Commissioners Court meeting September 15, 2009 5
Richard Vance-reminded the Court that they adopted a code
for mailboxes and driveways that are ignored by the builders.
Commissioner Peters- agreed but with the possibility of
filing a Class C criminal charge against the builders there is
enforcement.
Commissioner Cauley and Tina Snelling-said it can be
advertised on the website that a builder has potential
criminal charges for not following procedure.
Commissioner Cauley-asked that this item be placed on the
agenda.
Vol ~d 5 Page q~
The foregoing minutes of the Commissioners Court Workshop
held September 15, 2009, have been examined and approved in
open Court this the A4f day of 20()j_, in Bryan,
Brazos County, Texas.
Randy S' s Lloyd WAssermann
Count Judge Commissioner,
Precinct No. 1
Duane Peters Kenny MallArd
Commissioner, Commissioner,
Precinct No. 2 Precinct No. 3
I a Ca
Commissioner,
Precinct 4
Attest:
1~ E c
Karen McQueen
County Clerk
Vol I IQ 6 Page g
BRAZOS~_ COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT
Meeting on tA1j -C&&f 15 LfK)~`. 2009 (*Q Q -/k
Name/ Organization, / Department
d ,v'e ( d ~P. GE' c
o ~E
Co vk
ArJcc-
l~
PAGE of
VOL (a5
N
n
b~ NO
Op
BRAZOS COUNTY
BRYAN. TEXAS
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF BRAZOS §
ORDER NO. 09-012
REQUIRING THE APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF
SUBCHAPTER F, CHAPTER 233, LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE
RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE STANDARDS
AN ORDER requiring the Application of the Provisions of Subchapter F, Chapter 233, Local
Government Code, relating to Residential Building Code Standards, and providing a penalty.
1. The Commissioners Court of Brazos County, Texas does hereby adopt this Order requiring the
application of the provisions of Subchapter F, Chapter 233, Local Government Code, in the
unincorporated areas of this County.
2. A builder, subject to the provisions of this Order, shall provide notice to the County on a form
prescribed by the County of.
a. the location of the new residential construction;
b. the approximate date by which the new residential construction will be commenced; and
c. agree to follow the 2003 version of the International Residential Code and the 2002
version of the National Electrical Code for any new residential construction before
commencing construction.
hu ng
3. Not later than the 10`s day after the date of the final inspection, the building shall submit notice
of the inspection stating whether or not the inspection showed compliance with the building
code standards applicable to that phase of construction in a form required by the County to:
a. the following County employee, department or agency: Brazos County & Bride& Bride
De~artmene and
b. the person for whom the new residential construction is being built, if different from the
builder.
4. Failure to provide a notice required under this Order is a Class C Misdemeanor. This Order
shall be effective upon its adoption by the Commissioners Court and its publication once in a
newspaper of general circulation in the County.
ADOPTED this 1" day of September, 2009 by a vote of S ayes and (D nays.
Z7:~ D
Rand ims, County Judge
ATTEST:
wren McQueen, County C rk
,r~lad
r,_